Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Schurification of polynomial quantum wreath products

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves a double centralizer theorem—laurel Schur duality—for every polynomial quantum wreath product satisfying three coefficient-ring conditions, and gives explicit bases for the resulting Schur algebras.

desk verdict A real advance in Schurification for quantum wreath products, but the main theorem is conditional on an unproven (C1) and several key computations are left to the reader. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02108 v3 pith:3AZCSUYX submitted 2025-02-04 math.RT math.QA

Chun-Ju Lai , Alexandre Minets This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.RTmath.QA MSC 20C0816G9917B37
keywords SchuralgebrasquantumwreathproductsdoublecentralizertwistedconvolutionHeckeDemazureoperatorstensorspacedividedpowers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a uniform Schurification for a broad family of quantum wreath products: algebras generated by a polynomial ring $A=\Bbbk[x]$ or $\Bbbk[x^{\pm1}]$ over a finite-dimensional algebra together with Hecke-like generators, subject to three conditions (C1)-(C3). It builds two new Schur algebras from twisted convolution algebras—the coil algebra and the larger laurel algebra—and proves a double centralizer theorem: on the natural tensor module, each algebra is the full centralizer of the other. The laurel version removes an invertibility obstruction, so Schur duality survives for nil-Hecke algebras and small-characteristic cases where the coil version fails. The same machinery yields an explicit basis for the Schur algebras and a Dipper-James-style wreath Schur algebra on tensor space. If correct, this gives the first convolution-algebra realization for algebras presented via Bernstein-Lusztig generators and unifies Schur duality results for affine Hecke, degenerate affine Hecke, pro-$p$ Iwahori, affine zigzag, and affine Frobenius Hecke algebras.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a twisted convolution algebra: functions on a finite $G$-set $X\times X$ valued in the coefficient ring, with product $(f*g)(x,y)=\sum_z f(x,z)\psi(z)^{-1}g(z,y)$ for a twist $\psi$. The paper embeds $A\rtimes H(n)$ into such an algebra using a twist built from $\tilde C$, $\tilde\delta$, and the differences $x_i-x_j$, where $\tilde C$ is a weak Frobenius element solving $\tilde C(\mathrm{flip}(\tilde C)+\tilde\delta)=\tilde s$. The other engine is a family of twisted Demazure operators, which act as flip-twisted left derivations and generate the wreath relations, together with the quasi-idempotents $E_\lambda$, weighted sums of Hecke generators over Young subgroups, which play the role of divided powers. The laurel Schur algebra is the subalgebra generated by partial splits and merges—maps that coarsen or refine the composition labels—together with scalar idempotents, and the double centralizer theorem follows from cyclicity of the tensor module over this subalgebra.

What would settle it

Compute both sides of Theorem 6.7 for the nil-Hecke algebra at $n=3$, where $\tilde C=0$ and the relevant coefficients $A_\lambda$ are not invertible: if the centralizer of the tensor module inside the laurel Schur algebra is strictly larger than $A\rtimes H(3)$, the theorem is false, and if it matches, the theorem survives its hardest small-characteristic test. A complementary check is to exhibit any PQWP that has a PBW basis but admits no solution $\tilde C$ to $\tilde C(\mathrm{flip}(\tilde C)+\tilde\delta)=\tilde s$, which would mark the exact boundary of the theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result, Theorem 6.7, is a Schur duality for the laurel Schur algebra $S^{\mathrm{laurel}}$ of a polynomial quantum wreath product $A\rtimes H(n)$ satisfying (C1)-(C3): with $V^T$ the direct sum of right modules generated by the quasi-idempotents $E_\lambda$, one has $\mathrm{End}_{S^{\mathrm{laurel}}}(V^T) = A\rtimes H(n)$ and $S^{\mathrm{laurel}} = \mathrm{End}_{A\rtimes H(n)}(V^T)$. The proof realizes $A\rtimes H(n)$ inside a twisted convolution algebra whose twist records the factors $\tilde C(x_i-x_j)+\tilde\delta$, sending PBW monomials to a triangular family of characteristic functions. The centralizer computation then identifies $\mathrm{End}_{A\rtimes H(n)}(V^T)$ with the subalgebra generated by partial splits, partial merges, and function idempotents cut down to symmetric polynomials. The smaller coil Schur algebra is the special case where the elements $A_\lambda$ are invertible; the laurel algebra is the divided-power version that still works when they are zero divisors, and the two are Morita equivalent to the wreath Schur algebra for $b\ge n$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing hypothesis is that the coefficient ring contains an element $\tilde C$ satisfying $\tilde C(\mathrm{flip}(\tilde C)+\tilde\delta)=\tilde s$; the paper states this is crucial and not guaranteed, and if no such element exists the twisted-convolution embedding and the resulting Schur duality do not apply.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every PQWP satisfying (C1)-(C3), Schur duality holds with an explicit basis of the Schur algebra indexed by matrices in $\Theta_{b,n}$ with polynomial coefficients, so the representation theory is amenable to combinatorial computation.
  • The laurel Schur algebra keeps the double centralizer property in characteristics or specializations where factorial-like coefficients $A_\lambda$ vanish, making it the natural divided-power form for modular representations.
  • The coil, laurel, and wreath Schur algebras are identified up to Morita equivalence for $b\ge n$, so results proved on the geometric convolution side transfer to the algebraic permutation-module side.
  • The paper's examples supply new Schur dualities for degenerate affine Hecke algebras in arbitrary characteristic, for generic pro-$p$ Iwahori (Yokonuma) Hecke algebras, and for affine zigzag and affine Frobenius Hecke algebras.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The coil-versus-laurel distinction suggests a general integral-form principle: whenever a Schurification is built from idempotent sums, the divided-power version should be the one that survives over rings where factorials are not invertible; this could be tested on other wreath-product-like families.
  • The twisted convolution realization is geometric in spirit, so one can ask whether the basis elements $\theta_{A,f}$ are classes of explicit subvarieties under equivariant localization; a positive answer would bring positivity or canonical-basis phenomena to these Schur algebras.
  • Because the tensor-space action specializes the Kashiwara-Miwa-Stern construction, the wreath Schur algebra may carry a higher-level Fock-space or categorification structure; a concrete next step would be to search for a surjection from an appropriate Yangian onto the degenerate affine wreath Schur algebra.
  • The stark dependence on solving $\tilde C(\mathrm{flip}(\tilde C)+\tilde\delta)=\tilde s$ suggests that failure cases should be handled by localization or completion in $\tilde\delta$; if such an extension works, it would cover affine Frobenius Hecke algebras whose coefficients are not invertible.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Schurification theory for a class of quantum wreath products A⋊H(n) of polynomial type (PQWP), where the base algebra is a polynomial or Laurent polynomial ring over a finite-dimensional algebra. The main tool is a new family of twisted convolution algebras with S_n-equivariant R-valued functions and a twist built from an element \tilde C and a weak Frobenius element \tilde\delta. Under three conditions (C1)–(C3), the paper embeds A⋊H(n) into a twisted convolution algebra, defines two Schur-type algebras—the coil algebra S^BLM and the larger laurel algebra \tilde{S}^BLM—and proves double centralizer theorems, with explicit bases indexed by matrices in \Theta_{b,n} and partially symmetric polynomials. It also constructs a Dipper–James style wreath Schur algebra via a Kashiwara–Miwa–Stern type tensor action and proves Morita equivalence between the wreath and laurel constructions. Applications are claimed to affine Hecke algebras, degenerate affine Hecke algebras, pro-p Iwahori Hecke algebras, affine zigzag algebras, and Rosso–Savage affine Frobenius Hecke algebras.

Significance. If the main theorems are correct, the paper provides a uniform Schur duality for a broad class of quantum wreath products with infinite-dimensional base algebras, going beyond prior work that required finite-dimensional base or Coxeter presentations. The twisted convolution algebra construction is novel, and the explicit bases generalize the Dipper–James basis and are related to recent web/chicken-foot bases. The paper is also honest about its hypotheses: Theorem 6.7 is explicitly conditional on (C1)–(C3), and Example 5.1 states that (C1) may fail for some affine Frobenius Hecke algebras. However, the abstract and introduction present results for Rosso–Savage and Rees affine Frobenius Hecke algebras without flagging that for those families the required element \tilde C is only known to exist under additional assumptions such as nilpotence of \Delta. Because the central duality theorem is solid conditional mathematics but several named applications are not yet unconditional, the contribution is significant but not complete as advertised.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.1, Example 5.1, Table 1] Condition (C1) is load-bearing for the main duality theorem: it is used in Proposition 5.2 for the quadratic relation, in Section 6.4 for the existence of the polynomial representation, and hence in Lemma A.2 and Proposition 5.3. For Rosso–Savage affine Frobenius Hecke algebras the paper itself states that the required equation \tilde C(flip(\tilde C)+\Delta)=1 may have no solution in A⊗A, and Table 1 marks this entry 'may not exist'. Therefore Theorem 6.7 and Corollary 7.8 do not currently establish Schur duality for this named family; the abstract's claim of 'new results for ... Rosso–Savage's affine Frobenius Hecke algebras' is overbroad. The authors should either prove existence of \tilde C in the relevant cases or explicitly restrict the advertised applications to cases where (C1) is known to hold.
  2. [Proposition 3.10] The proof that a PQWP has a PBW basis is incomplete as written. After reducing (P6)–(P7) to monomials in three variables, the text states that checking all three variables 'would take too much space' and only treats multiplication by x1, leaving x2 and x3 to the reader. Since the PBW basis is used throughout the paper—for the image computation in Proposition 5.2(b), for the spanning sets in Propositions 5.9 and 6.3, and for the wreath Schur basis—this omitted verification is a genuine gap. A complete proof, or a clearly identified supplementary computation for x2 and x3, is needed.
  3. [Proposition 5.9] The linear independence of the proposed basis of the coil Schur algebra is delegated to a 'lengthy computation completely analogous to the proof of [MM, Theorem 4.10]', with only the highest term displayed. This is a central structural claim: without linear independence, the explicit basis in (5.11) and the subsequently derived basis of the wreath Schur algebra in Proposition 7.5 are not established. The authors should provide the triangularity argument in detail or give a precise reference that covers the noncommutative coefficient setting needed here.
  4. [Lemma 6.5] Lemma 6.5 is stated with 'Proof. Left to the reader', but it includes the key identity \tilde E^{(n)}_{(\lambda)} \tilde F^{(\lambda)}_{(n)} equal to the (\tilde C,\delta)-multinomial coefficient. This identity is used in Proposition 6.6 and in the proof of Theorem 6.7 to express partial merges and splits. An omitted proof of a load-bearing identity is not appropriate for a journal submission; a proof or a reduction to an explicit computation should be supplied.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Theorem 7.7] The statement of Theorem 7.7 says only 'Assume that b ≥ n', but the proof invokes Theorem 6.7, which requires conditions (C1)–(C3). The hypotheses should be stated explicitly in the theorem, and Corollary 7.8 should also be checked against these hypotheses.
  2. [Section 5.4] There is a typo: 'followiong' should be 'following' in the sentence defining the multinomial coefficients.
  3. [Example 3.9(d)] The text reads 'Let A be a Frobenuis algebra'; this should be 'Frobenius algebra'.
  4. [Lemmas 4.8, 4.9] These lemmas are said to be left to the reader. They are elementary, but for self-containedness a brief indication of proof would be helpful, especially since Lemma 4.9 is used in the proof of Theorem 4.11.
  5. [Corollary 5.6] The corollary assumes invertibility of A(i) for all i but does not explicitly define A(i) in its own statement; the notation is introduced in Corollary 5.4 and Example 5.7. Please add a cross-reference to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Schur dualities are proved from explicit bases and verified hypotheses, with conditional limitations stated rather than disguised.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Proposition 3.10 establishes the PBW basis for polynomial quantum wreath products by directly verifying the conditions (P1)-(P9) of the cited PBW criterion [LNX24], rather than assuming any Schur duality. Proposition 5.2 constructs the twisted-convolution embedding from the stated conditions (C1)-(C3) and proves injectivity using the PBW basis and the non-zero-divisor condition (C3). The double centralizer statements in Theorem 4.11, Corollary 5.6, and Theorem 6.7 are proven by explicit endomorphism computations on the bimodule V^T, with bases given in Propositions 5.9, 6.10, and 7.5. The one self-citation that is load-bearing, the PBW criterion of Lai-Nakano-Xiang, is used as an external theorem whose hypotheses are checked in the paper, so it is independent support rather than circular reliance. The conditions (C1)-(C3) are honestly stated as assumptions, and Section 5.1 plus Table 1 explicitly note that tilde C may fail to exist for affine Frobenius Hecke algebras; this makes the main theorem conditional in scope but does not reduce the conclusion to an input. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, and no known result is merely renamed. Therefore no circular step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 3 invented entities

No fitted numerical parameters appear; the construction is symbolic over arbitrary fields. The main assumptions are the polynomial-type conditions on the quantum wreath product. The new algebras are introduced as defined objects with explicit bases, so they carry their own falsifiable checks.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math The PBW basis criterion for quantum wreath products, taken from Lai-Nakano-Xiang Theorem 3.3.1
    Used as a black box in Proposition 2.4 and again in Proposition 3.10 to conclude that PQWP algebras have PBW bases; the paper verifies the hypotheses (P1)-(P9).
  • domain assumption Z is a unital finite-dimensional algebra over k and A is k[x] or k[x±1] over Z
    Definition 3.7 restricts to this polynomial setting; the polynomial representation and the twist construction rely on it.
  • domain assumption Conditions (C1)-(C3): existence of tilde C with tilde C(flip(tilde C)+tilde delta)=tilde s, centrality of tilde C and tilde delta, and non-zero-divisor property of tilde d = tilde C(x1-x2)+tilde delta
    Section 5.1 imposes these; the paper states (C2) is an artifact of the approach and gives a conjecture for removing it, while (C1) is 'crucial' and not guaranteed for all PQWP.
invented entities (3)
  • Coil Schur algebra S^BLM independent evidence
    purpose: Endomorphism algebra acting on the twisted convolution bimodule; standard integral form of the Schurification.
    Explicitly constructed in Section 5.2 with a basis in Proposition 5.9; its duality with A⋊H(n) is stated in Corollary 5.6 under invertibility.
  • Laurel Schur algebra S^BLM^tilde independent evidence
    purpose: Divided-power version that removes the invertibility assumption on A(σ).
    Constructed in Section 6.2 with basis in Corollary 6.10 and full Schur duality in Theorem 6.7.
  • Wreath Schur algebra S^DJ_{b,n} independent evidence
    purpose: Dipper-James style centralizer on the tensor space V_b^{⊗n}.
    Constructed in Section 7.2 with a basis in Proposition 7.5 and Schur duality in Theorem 7.7 for b≥n.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Schurification of polynomial quantum wreath products." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3AZCSUYX

@misc{pith2026250202108,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Schurification of polynomial quantum wreath products},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3AZCSUYX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02108}
}
abstract

We study the Schur algebra counterpart of a vast class of quantum wreath products. This is achieved by developing a theory of twisted convolution algebras, inspired by geometric intuition. In parallel, we provide an algebraic Schurification via a Kashiwara-Miwa-Stern-type action on a tensor space. We give a uniform proof of Schur duality, and construct explicit bases of the new Schur algebras. This provides new results for, among other examples, Vign\'eras' pro-$p$ Iwahori Hecke algebras of type $A$, degenerate affine Hecke algebras, Kleshchev-Muth's affine zigzag algebras, and Rosso-Savage's affine Frobenius Hecke algebras.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum wreath products and Schur--Weyl duality II

    math.RT 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    The authors define wreath modules for quantum wreath products that recover and unify simple modules over Ariki-Koike algebras, Specht modules over Hu algebras, and spherical modules over affine Hecke algebras while so...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ") INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence := #2 'after.sentence := #3 'after.block := STRINGS s t FUNCTION output.nonnull 's := output.state mid.sentence = ", " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline " " write output.state before.all = 'wri...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTIO...

  3. [3]

    N. Abe. Modulo p parabolic induction of pro- p - I wahori H ecke algebra. Journal f \"u r die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) , 2019(749):1--64, 2019

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Arakawa and T

    T. Arakawa and T. Suzuki. Duality between sl _n( C ) and the degenerate affine H ecke algebra. Journal of Algebra , 209(1):288--304, November 1998

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    C. J. Bushnell and G. Henniart. Generalized W hittaker models and the B ernstein center. American journal of mathematics , 125(3):513--547, 2003

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    Brundan and A

    J. Brundan and A. Kleshchev. Schur-- W eyl duality for higher levels. Selecta Mathematica , 14(1):1--57, 2008

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    H. Bao, J. Kujawa, Y. Li, and W. Wang. Geometric S chur duality of classical type. Transformation Groups , 23:329--389, 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Beilinson, G

    A. Beilinson, G. Lusztig, and R. MacPherson. A geometric setting for the quantum deformation of GL_n . Duke Math. J. , 61(1):655--677, 1990

    work page 1990

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Buciumas and M

    V. Buciumas and M. M. Patnaik. Metaplectic covers of p -adic groups and quantum groups at roots of unity. arXiv preprint , 2022. arXiv:2211.03724 https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.03724

    2022 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Bao and W

    H. Bao and W. Wang. A new approach to Kazhdan-Lusztig theory of type B via quantum symmetric pairs . Soci \'e t \'e math \'e matique de France Paris, 2018

    2018

  3. [11]

    H. Bao, W. Wang, and H. Watanabe. Multiparameter quantum S chur duality of type B . Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , 146(8):3203--3216, 2018

    2018

  4. [12]

    Chlouveraki and L

    M. Chlouveraki and L. P. d'Andecy. Markov traces on affine and cyclotomic Y okonuma-- H ecke algebras. International Mathematics Research Notices , 2016(14):4167--4228, 10 2015

    2016

  5. [13]

    Q. Chen, Z. Fan, and Q. Wang. Affine flag varieties of type D . arXiv preprint , 2024. arXiv:2403.04497 https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04497

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Chriss and V

    N. Chriss and V. Ginzburg. Representation theory and complex geometry , volume 42. Springer, 1997

    1997

  7. [15]

    Costello and I

    K. Costello and I. Grojnowski. Hilbert schemes, H ecke algebras and the C alogero-- S utherland system. arXiv preprint , 2003. arXiv:math/0310189 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0310189

    2003 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Chlouveraki and V

    M. Chlouveraki and V. S \'e cherre. The affine Y okonuma-- H ecke algebra and the pro- p - I wahori-- H ecke algebra. Mathematical Research Letters , 23(3):707--718, 2016

    2016

  9. [17]

    K. Y. Chan and G. Savin. Iwahori component of the G elfand-- G raev representation. Mathematische Zeitschrift , 288:125--133, 2018

    2018

  10. [18]

    W. Cui. Yokonuma- S chur algebras. arXiv preprint , 2014. arXiv:1405.6441 https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.6441

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    B. Deng, J. Du, B. Parshall, and J. Wang. Finite dimensional algebras and quantum groups. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs , 2008

    2008

  12. [20]

    Du and Q

    J. Du and Q. Fu. Quantum affine gl _n via H ecke algebras. Advances in Mathematics , 282:23--46, 2015

    2015

  13. [21]

    Dipper and G

    R. Dipper and G. James. The q - S chur algebra. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society , 3(1):23--50, 1989

    1989

  14. [22]

    Dipper and G

    R. Dipper and G. James. q -tensor space and q - W eyl modules. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 327(1):251--282, 1991

    1991

  15. [23]

    Davidson, J

    N. Davidson, J. Kujawa, R. Muth, and J. Zhu. Superalgebra deformations of web categories II : affine webs. In preparation

  16. [24]

    J. Du, Y. Li, and Z. Zhao. The q - S chur algebras in type D , I , fundamental multiplication formulas. arXiv preprint , 2024. arXiv:2406.09057 https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09057

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    B. Elias. A diamond lemma for H ecke-type algebras. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 375(3):1883--1915, 2022

    1915

  18. [26]

    Fan and Y

    Z. Fan and Y. Li. Geometric S chur duality of classical type, II . Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Series B , 2(2):51--92, 2015

    2015

  19. [27]

    Fan, C.-J

    Z. Fan, C.-J. Lai, Y. Li, L. Luo, and W. Wang. Affine flag varieties and quantum symmetric pairs , volume 265. American Mathematical Society, 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    Fan, C.-J

    Z. Fan, C.-J. Lai, Y. Li, L. Luo, W. Wang, and H. Watanabe. Quantum S chur duality of affine type C with three parameters. Mathematical Research Letters , 27(1):79--114, 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    Fan, C.-J

    Z. Fan, C.-J. Lai, Y. Li, L. Luo, and W. Wang. Affine H ecke algebras and quantum symmetric pairs , volume 281. American Mathematical Society, 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    F. Gao, N. Gurevich, and E. Karasiewicz. Genuine pro- p I wahori-- H ecke algebras, G elfand-- G raev representations, and some applications. Journal of the European Mathematical Society , 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    Grojnowski and G

    I. Grojnowski and G. Lusztig. On bases of irreducible representations of quantum GL_n . Kazhdan-- L usztig Theory and Related Topics, Chicago, IL, 1989 , pages 167--174, 1992

    1989

  24. [32]

    Ginzburg, N

    V. Ginzburg, N. Reshetikhin, and E. Vasserot. Quantum groups and flag varieties. Contemporary Mathematics , 175:101, 1994

    1994

  25. [33]

    Kleshchev and R

    A. Kleshchev and R. Muth. Affine zigzag algebras and imaginary strata for KLR algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 371(7):4535--4583, 2019

    2019

  26. [34]

    Kleshchev and R

    A. Kleshchev and R. Muth. Schurifying quasi-hereditary algebras. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society , 125(3):626--680, 2022

    2022

  27. [35]

    Kashiwara, T

    M. Kashiwara, T. Miwa, and E. Stern. Decomposition of q -deformed F ock spaces. Selecta Mathematica , 1:787--805, 1995

    1995

  28. [36]

    Lai and L

    C.-J. Lai and L. Luo. Schur algebras and quantum symmetric pairs with unequal parameters. International Mathematics Research Notices , 2021(13):10207--10259, 2021

    2021

  29. [37]

    C.-J. Lai, D. K. Nakano, and Z. Xiang. Quantum wreath products and S chur-- W eyl duality II . In preparation

  30. [38]

    C.-J. Lai, D. K. Nakano, and Z. Xiang. Quantum wreath products and S chur-- W eyl duality I . In Forum of Mathematics, Sigma , volume 12, page e108. Cambridge University Press, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    G. Lusztig. Aperiodicity in quantum affine gl _n . Asian Journal of Mathematics , 3:147--178, 1999

    1999

  32. [40]

    Maksimau and A

    R. Maksimau and A. Minets. Stratifying quiver S chur algebras via ersatz parity sheaves. In preparation

  33. [41]

    Maksimau and A

    R. Maksimau and A. Minets. KLR and Schur algebras for curves and semi-cuspidal representations. International Mathematics Research Notices , 2023(8):6976--7052, March 2022

    2023

  34. [42]

    Mathas and C

    A. Mathas and C. Stroppel. RAFH algebras: universal F robenius H ecke algebras and wreath products. In preparation

  35. [43]

    Miemietz and C

    V. Miemietz and C. Stroppel. Affine quiver S chur algebras and p -adic GL_n . Selecta Mathematica , 25:1--66, 2019

    2019

  36. [44]

    Ollivier

    R. Ollivier. Parabolic induction and H ecke modules in characteristic p for p -adic GL_n . Algebra & Number Theory , 4(6):701--742, 2010

    2010

  37. [45]

    G. Pouchin. A geometric Schur -- Weyl duality for quotients of affine Hecke algebras. Journal of Algebra , 321(1), January 2009

    2009

  38. [46]

    Rosso and A

    D. Rosso and A. Savage. Quantum affine wreath algebras. Documenta Mathematica , 25:425--456, 2020

    2020

  39. [47]

    A. Savage. Affine wreath product algebras. International Mathematics Research Notices , 2020(10):2977--3041, 2020

    2020

  40. [48]

    Stroppel and B

    C. Stroppel and B. Webster. Quiver S chur algebras and q - F ock space. arXiv preprint , 2011. arXiv:1110.1115 https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.1115

    2011 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Song and W

    L. Song and W. Wang. a A ffine and cyclotomic webs. arXiv preprint , 2024. arXiv:2406.13172 https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13172

    2024

  42. [50]

    Song and W

    L. Song and W. Wang. b A ffine and cyclotomic S chur categories. arXiv preprint , 2024. arXiv:2407.10119 https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10119

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Vign \'e ras

    M.-F. Vign \'e ras. Schur algebras of reductive p -adic groups, I . DUKE MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL , 116(1), 2003

    2003

  44. [52]

    Vigneras

    M.-F. Vigneras. The pro- p - I wahori H ecke algebra of a reductive p -adic group I . Compositio Mathematica , 152(4):693--753, 2016

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.