Motivic obstruction to rationality of a very general cubic hypersurface in mathbb P⁵
read the original abstract
Let $S$ be a smooth projective surface over a field. We introduce the notion of integral decomposability and, respectively, the opposite notion of integral indecomposability, of the transcendental motive $M^2_{\rm tr}(S)$. If the transcendental motive is indecomposable rationally, then it is indecomposable integrally. For example, $M^2_{\rm tr}(S)$ is rationally, and hence integrally indecomposable if $S$ is an algebraic $K3$-surface whose motive is known to be finite-dimensional. In the paper we prove that $M^2_{\rm tr}(S)$ is integrally indecomposable when $S$ is the self-product of a smooth projective curve having enough morphisms onto an elliptic curve with complex multiplication. This applies, for example, when $S$ is the self-product of the Fermat sextic in $\mathbb P^2$. Some refinement of the same technique yields that $M^2_{\rm tr}(S_6)$ is integrally indecomposable, where $S_6$ is the Fermat sextic in $\mathbb P^3$. This suggests a conjecture saying that the transcendental motive of any smooth projective surface is integrally indecomposable. We prove in the paper that if this motivic integral indecomposability conjecture is true, and if the motive of any smooth projective surface is finite-dimensional, then a very general cubic hypersurface in $\mathbb P^5$ is not rational.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Representability of codimension three cycles
The paper defines representability of codimension three cycles on fourfolds in terms of zero cycles modulo rational equivalence on surfaces.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.