Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 57 references

Network Digital Twin for Congestion-Aware Predictive Traffic Routing using Graph MPNNs

T0 review · 1 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-06-30 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A Network Digital Twin using Message Passing Neural Networks mirrors physical network behavior to enable real-time congestion-aware routing through policy-based commands.

desk verdict This is a system sketch for an MPNN-based network digital twin with no experiments or results attached. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.24318 v1 pith:3CBPV5Y2 submitted 2026-05-23 cs.NI

Umer Iqbal , Ashiq Anjum , Anthony S Conway , Mathias Kern , Anasol Pena Rios This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.NI
keywords networkdigitaltwinmessagepassingneuralnetworkscongestionawareroutinggraphpolicybasedsynthetictopologiespredictivetraffic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that a Network Digital Twin can use Message Passing Neural Networks to classify network edges based on local vertex and global behaviors collected from routers and links. Synthetic traffic is generated across Erdos-Renyi, Barabasi-Albert, and Watts-Strogatz topologies with vertex degree limits to train the model and align it with physical network performance. This allows the digital twin to send feedback as Policy-Based Routing commands for optimal traffic distribution without disrupting services. A reader would care if this enables proactive adaptation to dynamic traffic and topology changes, unlike traditional reactive protocols that only act after degradation occurs.

What carries the argument

Message Passing Neural Networks (MPNNs) that classify edges using local vertex and global network behaviours to generate routing policies in the Network Digital Twin.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of the MPNN-predicted edge classifications and resulting routing performance against actual measured congestion in a physical or emulated network with unseen traffic patterns and topologies would determine if the approach works.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The Network Digital Twin addresses scaling challenges in telecom networks by mirroring global network behaviour using Message Passing Neural Networks through bidirectional communication with the physical network. Synthetic traffic with increasing load is generated across incrementally scaling topological structures from Erdos-Renyi, Barabasi-Albert, and Watts-Strogatz models with vertex degree limitations. The MPNNs classify edges based on performance metrics, enabling feedback via Policy-Based Routing protocol commands to each router for optimal traffic distribution across links.

Load-bearing premise

MPNNs trained on synthetic traffic generated across Erdos-Renyi, Barabasi-Albert, and Watts-Strogatz topologies with vertex degree limits will produce edge classifications that transfer to real-world dynamic traffic and topologies.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The NDT can adapt routing in real time to dynamic traffic and topological changes.
  • It scales with network growth by training on incrementally larger topologies.
  • It provides continuous feedback for congestion-aware optimization without disrupting active services.
  • Edge classifications lead to better traffic distribution reducing delay and increasing throughput.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the model transfers well, it could support other predictive network management applications like fault detection.
  • Validation would require comparing performance metrics in real deployments against traditional routing.
  • Extending the approach to hybrid topologies combining the tested models might improve robustness.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Network Digital Twin (NDT) architecture for congestion-aware predictive traffic routing. Synthetic traffic with increasing load is generated on degree-limited Erdos-Renyi, Barabasi-Albert, and Watts-Strogatz topologies. MPNNs classify edges using local vertex and global network features collected from the physical network; the resulting classifications are fed back as Policy-Based Routing (PBR) commands to enable real-time optimization and bidirectional mirroring.

Significance. If the MPNN-based edge classification were shown to transfer reliably from the described synthetic graphs to real dynamic traffic and topologies, the approach could enable proactive, scalable routing that anticipates congestion without service disruption. The use of standard graph generators and MPNNs is a conventional starting point, but the lack of any reported validation leaves the practical significance undetermined.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / Proposed Architecture] Abstract and proposed method description: The manuscript outlines the synthetic data generation, MPNN edge classification, and PBR feedback pipeline but supplies no accuracy metrics, ablation studies, transfer tests across topology families, or comparisons against baseline routing protocols. This omission is load-bearing because the central claim—that MPNN classifications reflecting local+global behavior will produce effective PBR commands and enable bidirectional mirroring—cannot be evaluated without evidence that the learned representations survive the distribution shift from synthetic ER/BA/WS graphs to real-world dynamic traffic.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback emphasizing the need for quantitative evidence to support the central claims of the proposed Network Digital Twin architecture. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Proposed Architecture] Abstract and proposed method description: The manuscript outlines the synthetic data generation, MPNN edge classification, and PBR feedback pipeline but supplies no accuracy metrics, ablation studies, transfer tests across topology families, or comparisons against baseline routing protocols. This omission is load-bearing because the central claim—that MPNN classifications reflecting local+global behavior will produce effective PBR commands and enable bidirectional mirroring—cannot be evaluated without evidence that the learned representations survive the distribution shift from synthetic ER/BA/WS graphs to real-world dynamic traffic.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript is primarily architectural and descriptive, presenting the synthetic data generation process, MPNN-based edge classification using local and global features, and the PBR feedback loop without accompanying numerical results, ablations, or baseline comparisons. This limits direct evaluation of the claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated experimental section reporting MPNN classification accuracy on the described synthetic ER, BA, and WS topologies under increasing load, ablation results isolating local vertex versus global network features, and comparisons against standard routing baselines such as OSPF and ECMP. We will also explicitly state that the work is scoped to synthetic topologies to enable controlled study of topology scaling and load variation, and we will add a limitations discussion on distribution shift to real-world traffic together with suggested directions for future validation. These additions will permit assessment of the MPNN-to-PBR pipeline within the synthetic regime while acknowledging the transfer question. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Empirical validation or transfer tests on real-world dynamic traffic and non-synthetic topologies, as the study is confined to controlled synthetic graph generators.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: method description uses standard external components with no self-referential derivations

full rationale

The paper presents a high-level system architecture for an NDT using MPNNs on synthetic graphs (ER/BA/WS with degree limits) to classify edges and issue PBR feedback. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivation steps are described in the abstract or reader's summary. The approach relies on external graph generators and standard MPNN usage without any self-definition, fitted-input-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chains. The central claim is a proposed pipeline rather than a mathematical reduction, so no step reduces to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The proposal depends on the assumption that synthetic graphs and traffic adequately represent real networks and that MPNN classifications will generalize; no free parameters or new entities with independent evidence are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Synthetic traffic on Erdos-Renyi, Barabasi-Albert, and Watts-Strogatz graphs with vertex degree limits models real telecom network behavior sufficiently for training.
    Invoked to generate training data for the MPNN-based NDT.
invented entities (1)
  • Network Digital Twin with MPNN edge classification
    purpose: To provide bidirectional mirroring and predictive routing feedback.
    Core proposed system; no independent falsifiable evidence supplied.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Network Digital Twin for Congestion-Aware Predictive Traffic Routing using Graph MPNNs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3CBPV5Y2

@misc{pith2026260524318,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Network Digital Twin for Congestion-Aware Predictive Traffic Routing using Graph MPNNs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3CBPV5Y2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.24318}
}
read the original abstract

Telecom networks scale with growing users and data-intensive applications, generating heavy traffic that causes congestion, reducing throughput, increasing delay, and raising computational costs. Traditional routing protocols act only after performance degradation, making them unsuitable for dynamic traffic and topological changes. Addressing these challenges requires a routing approach that adapts in real time, scales with network growth, operates without disrupting active services, and provides continuous feedback for congestion-aware traffic optimisation. The Network Digital Twin (NDT) addresses these needs by mirroring global network behaviour using Message Passing Neural Networks (MPNNs) through bidirectional communication with the physical network. To align the NDT with physical network behaviour, synthetic traffic is generated with increasing load across topological structures that incrementally scale as routers are added. These topologies are created by graph-generating models such as Erdos-Renyi, Barabasi-Albert, and Watts-Strogatz, customised with vertex degree limitations. The NDT collects performance metrics from routers and links, and MPNNs classify edges based on local vertex and global network behaviours. Based on these classifications, feedback is sent as Policy-Based Routing (PBR) protocol commands to each router, enabling optimal traffic distribution across links of the physical network.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24318 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Bidirectional Communication in the Network Digital [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Architecture of the Network Digital Twim (NDT): [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Four-layer MPNN architecture: input, message passing, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Local vertex behaviour emerges through interactions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Percentage of network traffic rerouting with the number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The router uses real-time traffic metrics to reroute [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: End-to-end file transmission delays for varying file [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Delay for overall network transmission based on graph [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: End-to-end file transfer rate for varying file sizes, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: File transfer rate for overall network transmission [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: End-to-end file transmission throughput for varying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Throughput for overall network transmission based [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_18.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nguyen, Ming Ding, Pubudu N

    Dinh C. Nguyen, Ming Ding, Pubudu N. Pathirana, Aruna Seneviratne, Jun Li, Dusit Niyato, Octavia Dobre, and H. Vincent Poor. 6g internet of things: A comprehensive survey.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(1):359–383, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Shahjalal, Shakil Ahmed, and Yeong Min Jang

    Mostafa Zaman Chowdhury, Md. Shahjalal, Shakil Ahmed, and Yeong Min Jang. 6g wireless communication systems: Applications, requirements, technologies, challenges, and research directions.IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 1:957–975, 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Khawaja, Farah Sabir, Sameer Qazi, and Muhammad Mustaqim

    Kinza Shafique, Bilal A. Khawaja, Farah Sabir, Sameer Qazi, and Muhammad Mustaqim. Internet of things (iot) for next-generation smart systems: A review of current challenges, future trends and prospects for emerging 5g-iot scenarios.IEEE Access, 8:23022–23040, 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    A new intrusion detection system for the internet of things via deep convolutional neural network and feature engineering.Sensors, 22(10):3607, 2022

    Safi Ullah, Jawad Ahmad, Muazzam A Khan, Eman H Alkhammash, Myriam Hadjouni, Yazeed Yasin Ghadi, Faisal Saeed, and Nikolaos Pitropakis. A new intrusion detection system for the internet of things via deep convolutional neural network and feature engineering.Sensors, 22(10):3607, 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling tech- nologies and potential applications.Journal of industrial information integration, 26:100257, 2022

    Praveen Kumar Reddy Maddikunta, Quoc-Viet Pham, B Prabadevi, Natarajan Deepa, Kapal Dev, Thippa Reddy Gadekallu, Rukhsana Ruby, and Madhusanka Liyanage. Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling tech- nologies and potential applications.Journal of industrial information integration, 26:100257, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    The disruptions of 5g on data-driven technologies and applications.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 32(6):1179–1198, 2020

    Dumitrel Loghin, Shaofeng Cai, Gang Chen, Tien Tuan Anh Dinh, Feiyi Fan, Qian Lin, Janice Ng, Beng Chin Ooi, Xutao Sun, Quang- Trung Ta, Wei Wang, Xiaokui Xiao, Yang Yang, Meihui Zhang, and Zhonghua Zhang. The disruptions of 5g on data-driven technologies and applications.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 32(6):1179–1198, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Artificial-intelligence-enabled intelligent 6g networks.IEEE Network, 34(6):272–280, 2020

    Helin Yang, Arokiaswami Alphones, Zehui Xiong, Dusit Niyato, Jun Zhao, and Kaishun Wu. Artificial-intelligence-enabled intelligent 6g networks.IEEE Network, 34(6):272–280, 2020

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Samuel Olaoluwa Folorunsho, Olubunmi Adeolu Adenekan, Chinedu Ezeigweneme, Ike Chidiebere Somadina, and Patrick Azuka Okeleke. Optimizing network performance and quality of service with ai-driven solutions for future telecommunications.International Journal of Frontiers in Engineering and Technology Research, 7(1):73–92, 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Diego Kreutz, Fernando M. V . Ramos, Paulo Esteves Ver ´ıssimo, Christian Esteve Rothenberg, Siamak Azodolmolky, and Steve Uhlig. Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey.Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(1):14–76, 2015

    2015

  2. [10]

    Evolution of next generation net- works and its contribution towards industry 5.0.Resource Management in Advanced Wireless Networks, pages 45–80, 2025

    M Kiruthiga Devi and M Padma Priya. Evolution of next generation net- works and its contribution towards industry 5.0.Resource Management in Advanced Wireless Networks, pages 45–80, 2025

    2025

  3. [11]

    Optimizing 5g net- work performance with dynamic resource allocation, robust encryption and quality of service (qos) enhancement.PeerJ Computer Science, 10:e2567, 2024

    Abdullah M Alashjaee, Sumit Kushwaha, Hayam Alamro, Asma Abbas Hassan, Fuhid Alanazi, and Abdullah Mohamed. Optimizing 5g net- work performance with dynamic resource allocation, robust encryption and quality of service (qos) enhancement.PeerJ Computer Science, 10:e2567, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    A systematic network traffic emulation framework for digital twin network

    Hongwei Yang, Yang Li, Kehan Yao, Tao Sun, and Cheng Zhou. A systematic network traffic emulation framework for digital twin network. pages 94–97, 2021

    2021

  5. [13]

    Network digital twin: Context, enabling technologies, and opportunities.IEEE Communications Magazine, 60(11):22–27, 2022

    Paul Almasan, Miquel Ferriol-Galm ´es, Jordi Paillisse, Jos ´e Su ´arez- Varela, Diego Perino, Diego L ´opez, Antonio Agustin Pastor Perales, Paul Harvey, Laurent Ciavaglia, Leon Wong, Vishnu Ram, Shihan Xiao, Xiang Shi, Xiangle Cheng, Albert Cabellos-Aparicio, and Pere Barlet...

    2022

  6. [14]

    Message passing neural networks for traffic forecasting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.05740, 2023

    Arian Prabowo, Hao Xue, Wei Shao, Piotr Koniusz, and Flora D Salim. Message passing neural networks for traffic forecasting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.05740, 2023

    2023

  7. [15]

    Ai-driven traffic optimization in 5g and beyond: Challenges, strategies, solutions, and prospects

    Ezekiel Ehime Agbon, Aminu Chiroma Muhammad, Christo- pher Akinyemi Alabi, Agburu Ogah Adikpe, Sena Timothy Tersoo, Agbotiname Lucky Imoize, and Samarendra Nath Sur. Ai-driven traffic optimization in 5g and beyond: Challenges, strategies, solutions, and prospects. InInternatio...

    2024

  8. [16]

    Elsayed Mostafa, Salma Elbess, Asmaa Ibrahim, Riham Abdo, and Samy S. Soliman. Using artificial intelligence for congestion control and vehicles rerouting. In2022 International Telecommunications Conference (ITC-Egypt), pages 1–6, 2022

    2022

  9. [17]

    Exploring the potential of ai-driven optimization in enhancing network performance and efficiency.Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 10(1):368–378, 2024

    Uchenna Joseph Umoga, Enoch Oluwademilade Sodiya, Ejike David Ugwuanyi, Boma Sonimitiem Jacks, Oluwaseun Augustine Lottu, Obinna Donald Daraojimba, Alexander Obaigbena, et al. Exploring the potential of ai-driven optimization in enhancing network performance and efficiency.Mag...

    2024

  10. [18]

    Random graph modeling: A survey of the concepts.ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 52(6):1–36, 2019

    Mikhail Drobyshevskiy and Denis Turdakov. Random graph modeling: A survey of the concepts.ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 52(6):1–36, 2019

    2019

  11. [19]

    Cambridge university press, 2024

    Remco Van Der Hofstad.Random graphs and complex networks, volume 54. Cambridge university press, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    An exceeding recovery model for enhancing network resilience against cascading failures.IEEE Access, 10:71035–71043, 2022

    Jie Li, Ying Wang, and Jilong Zhong. An exceeding recovery model for enhancing network resilience against cascading failures.IEEE Access, 10:71035–71043, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Modified erd ˝os–r´enyi random graph model for generating synthetic power grids.IEEE Systems Journal, 18(1):96–107, 2024

    Mohammad Shahraeini. Modified erd ˝os–r´enyi random graph model for generating synthetic power grids.IEEE Systems Journal, 18(1):96–107, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Emergence of scaling in random networks.science, 286(5439):509–512, 1999

    Albert-L ´aszl´o Barab ´asi and R ´eka Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks.science, 286(5439):509–512, 1999

    1999

  15. [23]

    Preferential attachment and variants

    D Chakrabarti and C Faloutsos. Preferential attachment and variants. In Graph Mining: Laws, Tools, and Case Studies, pages 53–65. Springer, 2012

    2012

  16. [24]

    Collective dynamics of ‘small- world’networks.nature, 393(6684):440–442, 1998

    Duncan J Watts and Steven H Strogatz. Collective dynamics of ‘small- world’networks.nature, 393(6684):440–442, 1998. 16

    1998

  17. [25]

    An improved textrank keyword extraction method based on the watts-strogatz model.Inf

    AF Li, L Zhang, and A Khadka. An improved textrank keyword extraction method based on the watts-strogatz model.Inf. Dyn. Appl, 3(2):77–88, 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    A review: Multi protocol label switching (mpls).International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 4(1):66–70, 2014

    Rashed Qayoom Shawl, Rukhsana Thaker, and Er Jasvinder Singh. A review: Multi protocol label switching (mpls).International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 4(1):66–70, 2014

    2014

  19. [27]

    Recent trends in mpls networks: technologies, applications and challenges.IET Communications, 14(2):177–185, 2020

    Mohammad Azmi Ridwan, Nurul Asyikin Mohamed Radzi, Wan Siti Halimatul Munirah Wan Ahmad, Fairuz Abdullah, Md Zaini Jamaludin, and Mohd Nasim Zakaria. Recent trends in mpls networks: technologies, applications and challenges.IET Communications, 14(2):177–185, 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    Magnneto: A graph neural network-based multi-agent system for traffic engineering.IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 9(2):494–506, 2023

    Guillermo Bern ´ardez, Jos ´e Su ´arez-Varela, Albert L ´opez, Xiang Shi, Shihan Xiao, Xiangle Cheng, Pere Barlet-Ros, and Albert Cabellos- Aparicio. Magnneto: A graph neural network-based multi-agent system for traffic engineering.IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications...

    2023

  21. [29]

    Mpls traffic engineering in ospf networks—a combined approach

    Stefan K ¨ohler and Andreas Binzenh¨ofer. Mpls traffic engineering in ospf networks—a combined approach. InTeletraffic Science and Engineering, volume 5, pages 21–30. Elsevier, 2003

    2003

  22. [30]

    A review-analysis of network topologies for microen- terprises.Small, 3:15–000, 2016

    Francis Pol Lim. A review-analysis of network topologies for microen- terprises.Small, 3:15–000, 2016

    2016

  23. [31]

    Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications.AI Open, 1:57– 81, 2020

    Jie Zhou, Ganqu Cui, Shengding Hu, Zhengyan Zhang, Cheng Yang, Zhiyuan Liu, Lifeng Wang, Changcheng Li, and Maosong Sun. Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications.AI Open, 1:57– 81, 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Internet traffic engineering using multi-protocol label switching (mpls).Computer Networks, 40(1):111– 129, 2002

    Daniel O Awduche and Bijan Jabbari. Internet traffic engineering using multi-protocol label switching (mpls).Computer Networks, 40(1):111– 129, 2002

    2002

  25. [33]

    Label switched protocol routing with guaranteed bandwidth and end to end path delay in mpls networks.Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 42:21–38, 2014

    Mehdi Naderi Soorki and Habib Rostami. Label switched protocol routing with guaranteed bandwidth and end to end path delay in mpls networks.Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 42:21–38, 2014

    2014

  26. [34]

    Cisco press, 2001

    Vivek Alwayn.Advanced MPLS design and implementation. Cisco press, 2001

    2001

  27. [35]

    Design and Investigation of Bandwidth Management Technique for Service-Aware Traffic Engineering using Internet Protocol/Multi- Protocol Label Switching (IP/MPLS) for 5G

    Oba Z Mustapha.Intelligent based Packet Scheduling Scheme using Internet Protocol/Multi-Protocol Label Switching (IP/MPLS) Technology for 5G. Design and Investigation of Bandwidth Management Technique for Service-Aware Traffic Engineering using Internet Protocol/Multi- Protoco...

    2019

  28. [36]

    Anjali, C

    T. Anjali, C. Scoglio, and J.C. de Oliveira. New mpls network management techniques based on adaptive learning.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 16(5):1242–1255, 2005

    2005

  29. [37]

    Survey of graph neural networks and applications.Wireless Communi- cations and Mobile Computing, 2022(1):9261537, 2022

    Fan Liang, Cheng Qian, Wei Yu, David Griffith, and Nada Golmie. Survey of graph neural networks and applications.Wireless Communi- cations and Mobile Computing, 2022(1):9261537, 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Graph neural networks for intelligent modelling in network man- agement and orchestration: a survey on communications.Electronics, 11(20):3371, 2022

    Prohim Tam, Inseok Song, Seungwoo Kang, Seyha Ros, and Seokhoon Kim. Graph neural networks for intelligent modelling in network man- agement and orchestration: a survey on communications.Electronics, 11(20):3371, 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    Dampnn: Dynamic adaptive message passing neural network for industrial soft sensor.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2024

    Feng Yan, Chunjie Yang, Liyuan Kong, and Chong Yang. Dampnn: Dynamic adaptive message passing neural network for industrial soft sensor.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    Traffic-aware lightweight hierarchical offloading toward adaptive slicing- enabled sagin.IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 42(12):3536–3550, 2024

    Zheyi Chen, Junjie Zhang, Geyong Min, Zhaolong Ning, and Jie Li. Traffic-aware lightweight hierarchical offloading toward adaptive slicing- enabled sagin.IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 42(12):3536–3550, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Graph neural network based resource allocation for full-duplex device-to-device communication

    Xinxin Zhang and Xin Zhang. Graph neural network based resource allocation for full-duplex device-to-device communication. In2024 In- ternational Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC), pages 780–785. IEEE, 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    Building a digital twin for network optimization using graph neural networks.Computer Networks, 217:109329, 2022

    Miquel Ferriol-Galm ´es, Jos ´e Su ´arez-Varela, Jordi Pailliss ´e, Xiang Shi, Shihan Xiao, Xiangle Cheng, Pere Barlet-Ros, and Albert Cabellos- Aparicio. Building a digital twin for network optimization using graph neural networks.Computer Networks, 217:109329, 2022

    2022

  35. [43]

    Empowering digital twin for future networks with graph neural networks: Overview, enabling technologies, chal- lenges, and opportunities.Future internet, 15(12):377, 2023

    Duc-Thinh Ngo, Ons Aouedi, Kandaraj Piamrat, Thomas Hassan, and Philippe Raipin-Parv ´edy. Empowering digital twin for future networks with graph neural networks: Overview, enabling technologies, chal- lenges, and opportunities.Future internet, 15(12):377, 2023

    2023

  36. [44]

    Inference of sim- ulation models in digital twins by reinforcement learning

    Istvan David, Jessie Galasso, and Eugene Syriani. Inference of sim- ulation models in digital twins by reinforcement learning. In2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C), pages 221–224. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  37. [45]

    Deep learning for hybrid 5g services in mobile edge computing systems: Learn from a digital twin.IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 18(10):4692–4707, 2019

    Rui Dong, Changyang She, Wibowo Hardjawana, Yonghui Li, and Branka Vucetic. Deep learning for hybrid 5g services in mobile edge computing systems: Learn from a digital twin.IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 18(10):4692–4707, 2019

    2019

  38. [46]

    Digital twins from a networking perspective.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(23):23525– 23544, 2022

    Mehrad Vaezi, Kiana Noroozi, Terence D Todd, Dongmei Zhao, George Karakostas, Huaqing Wu, and Xuemin Shen. Digital twins from a networking perspective.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(23):23525– 23544, 2022

    2022

  39. [47]

    A novel dynamic software-defined networking approach to neutralize traffic burst.Computers, 12(7):131, 2023

    Aakanksha Sharma, Venki Balasubramanian, and Joarder Kamruzzaman. A novel dynamic software-defined networking approach to neutralize traffic burst.Computers, 12(7):131, 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    A deep reinforcement learning approach for adaptive traffic routing in next-gen networks

    Akshita Abrol, Purnima Murali Mohan, and Tram Truong-Huu. A deep reinforcement learning approach for adaptive traffic routing in next-gen networks. InICC 2024-IEEE International Conference on Communications, pages 465–471. IEEE, 2024

    2024

  41. [49]

    Dqqs: Deep reinforcement learning-based technique for enhancing security and performance in sdn- iot environments.IEEE Access, 12:60568–60587, 2024

    Fahim Arif, Nauman Ali Khan, Javed Iqbal, Faten Khalid Karim, Nisreen Innab, Samih M Mostafa, et al. Dqqs: Deep reinforcement learning-based technique for enhancing security and performance in sdn- iot environments.IEEE Access, 12:60568–60587, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Dynamic routing optimization in software-defined networking based on a metaheuristic algorithm.Journal of Cloud Computing, 13(1):41, 2024

    Junyan Chen, Wei Xiao, Hongmei Zhang, Jiacheng Zuo, and Xinmei Li. Dynamic routing optimization in software-defined networking based on a metaheuristic algorithm.Journal of Cloud Computing, 13(1):41, 2024

    2024

  43. [51]

    Rs-maddpg: Routing strategy based on multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradient for differentiated qos services.Future Internet, 17(9):393, 2025

    Shi Kuang, Jinyu Zheng, Shilin Liang, Yingying Li, Siyuan Liang, and Wanwei Huang. Rs-maddpg: Routing strategy based on multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradient for differentiated qos services.Future Internet, 17(9):393, 2025

    2025

  44. [52]

    Congestion control mechanism based on backpressure feedback in data center networks.Future Internet, 16(4):131, 2024

    Wei Li, Mengzhen Ren, Yazhi Liu, Chenyu Li, Hui Qian, and Zhenyou Zhang. Congestion control mechanism based on backpressure feedback in data center networks.Future Internet, 16(4):131, 2024

    2024

  45. [53]

    Effectively handling network congestion and load balancing in software-defined networking.Computers, Materials & Continua, 70(1), 2022

    Shabir Ahmad, Faisal Jamil, Abid Ali, Ehtisham Khan, Muhammad Ibrahim, et al. Effectively handling network congestion and load balancing in software-defined networking.Computers, Materials & Continua, 70(1), 2022

    2022

  46. [54]

    Kanellopoulos, Varun Kumar Sharma, Poulami Dalapati, and Oliver P

    Reza Poorzare, Dimitris N. Kanellopoulos, Varun Kumar Sharma, Poulami Dalapati, and Oliver P. Waldhorst. Network digital twin toward networking, telecommunications, and traffic engineering: A survey. IEEE Access, 13:16489–16538, 2025

    2025

  47. [55]

    In-network machine learning using programmable network devices: A survey.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 26(2):1171–1200, 2024

    Changgang Zheng, Xinpeng Hong, Damu Ding, Shay Vargaftik, Yaniv Ben-Itzhak, and Noa Zilberman. In-network machine learning using programmable network devices: A survey.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 26(2):1171–1200, 2024

    2024

  48. [56]

    Deploying secure distributed systems: Comparative analysis of gns3 and seed internet emulator.Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, 3(3):464–492, 2023

    Lewis Golightly, Paolo Modesti, and Victor Chang. Deploying secure distributed systems: Comparative analysis of gns3 and seed internet emulator.Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, 3(3):464–492, 2023

    2023

  49. [57]

    Framework for integrating machine learning methods for path-aware source routing

    Anees Al-Najjar, Domingos Paraiso, Mariam Kiran, Cristina Dominicini, Everson Borges, Rafael Guimaraes, Magnos Martinello, and Harvey Newman. Framework for integrating machine learning methods for path-aware source routing. InSC24-W: Workshops of the International Conference f...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed June 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.