Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Comparative Analysis of the Time and Energy Demand of Versatile Video Coding and High Efficiency Video Coding Reference Decoders

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.10283 v1 pith:3CIXZCBO submitted 2022-09-21 eess.IV

classification eess.IV
keywords energycodingdemanddecoderdecodingconfigurationincreasetime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper investigates the decoding energy and decoding time demand of VTM-7.0 in relation to HM-16.20. We present the first detailed comparison of two video codecs in terms of software decoder energy consumption. The evaluation shows that the energy demand of the VTM decoder is increased significantly compared to HM and that the increase depends on the coding configuration. For the coding configuration randomaccess, we find that the decoding energy is increased by over 80% at a decoding time increase of over 70%. Furthermore, results indicate that the energy demand increases by up to 207% when Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) instructions are disabled, which corresponds to the HM implementation style. By measurements, it is revealed that the coding tools MIP, AMVR, TPM, LFNST, and MTS increase the energy efficiency of the decoder. Furthermore, we propose a new coding configuration based on our analysis, which reduces the energy demand of the VTM decoder by over 17% on average.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools