Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 36 references

Asymptotic limit of a vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation for phase transition dynamics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that, as ε→0, the two-sphere vector Allen-Cahn equation converges to mean curvature flow, harmonic map heat flow, and the weighted jump b²∂ν ω+ = a²∂ν ω−.

desk verdict Real new theorem for the KRS problem in general dimension, but the approximate-solution construction has a load-bearing regularity gap. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.18754 v1 pith:3CPQ7UP6 submitted 2025-08-26 math.AP

Huan Dong , Wei Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35B2535K5735K55
keywords vector-valuedAllen-CahnsharpinterfacelimitmeancurvatureflowharmonicmapheatmatchedasymptoticexpansionsspectrallowerboundKeller-Rubinstein-Sternbergproblemtwo-wellpotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes the sharp-interface limit of the vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation whose potential vanishes on two concentric spheres of radii a and b in $\mathbb{R}^n$. Its main theorem says that, as the interface thickness $\varepsilon \to 0$, the interface itself moves by mean curvature flow, the vector field in the two bulk regions evolves by harmonic map heat flow into $S^{n-1}$, and across the interface the unit directions satisfy $\omega_+ = \omega_-$ together with the weighted normal-derivative jump $b^2 \partial_\nu \omega_+ = a^2 \partial_\nu \omega_-$. The proof constructs approximate solutions to arbitrarily high order in $\varepsilon$ by matched asymptotic expansions, then proves a uniform spectral lower bound for the linearized operator at the approximate solution, which yields the quantitative error estimate $E(u_\varepsilon(t) - u_K(t)) \leq C_1 \varepsilon^{2k}$. This removes the radial-symmetry assumption of the $n=2$ result of Bronsard-Stoth and provides the first rigorous derivation of the full system for general n, identifying the mixed boundary condition as a consequence of the compatibility conditions rather than an imposed ansatz.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the inner profile $u_0(z,x,t) = \rho_0(z)\bar{\omega}(\eta_1(z),x,t)$, where $\rho_0$ is the heteroclinic solution of $\rho'' = f(\rho)$ connecting $a$ to $b$, and $\bar{\omega}$ runs along a geodesic of $S^{n-1}$ from $\omega_-$ to $\omega_+$. The interpolation function $\eta_1(z) = \frac{b^2 - a^2 b^2 F(z)}{b^2 - a^2}$, with $F(z) = z^{-1} \int_0^z \rho_0(s)^{-2} \, ds$, is chosen so that $B_\nu \bar{\omega} = \left[ \frac{a^2 b^2 F}{b^2 - a^2} \right] (B_\nu \omega_- - B_\nu \omega_+) + \ldots$ ; combined with the jump condition $b^2 B_\nu \omega_+ = a^2 B_\nu \omega_-$ it makes $B_r(\rho_0^2 B_r E_0) = O(1)$ at the interface. This reduces the spectral estimate for the linearized operator to two scalar one-dimensional quadratic forms $Q_0$ and $Q_1$ with potentials $\rho_0^3 / \rho_0'$ and $\rho_0^2 / \rho_0$, which are then estimated by integration by parts against the heteroclinic profil

What would settle it

Solve the first-order system (4.1)–(4.4) for a smooth non-planar limit solution, e.g., a shrinking sphere in $\mathbb{R}^3$ with $n=3$; if $d_1|_\Gamma$ and $\sigma_{\pm 1,\beta}$ are not determined (or require additional compatibility data) by the asserted trace and parabolic-existence step, the arbitrary-order approximate solution of Theorem 1.1 does not exist and the convergence proof collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Dong and Wang claim that for any smooth solution ($\Gamma_t, \omega_\pm$) of the sharp-interface system (1.8) on $[0,T]$, and for well-prepared initial data satisfying $E(u_\varepsilon(0) - u_K(0)) \leq C_0 \varepsilon^{2k}$, the solution $u_\varepsilon$ of (1.5) satisfies $E(u_\varepsilon(t) - u_K(t)) \leq C_1 \varepsilon^{2k}$ for all $t \in [0,T]$ (Theorem 1.3). The approximate solution $u_K$ is built in Theorem 1.1 by gluing outer expansions $u_{\pm 0} = b\omega_+$ in $\Omega_+$ and $a\omega_-$ in $\Omega_-$ with inner expansions in the fast variable $z = d_\varepsilon/\varepsilon$; the leading inner state is $u_0 = \rho_0(z)\bar{\omega}(\eta_1(z),x,t)$, where $\rho_0$ solves the heteroclinic ODE $\rho'' = f(\rho)$ with limits a and b. The key new point is that the first compatibility condition forces the interface speed to be mean curvature and the second forces the mi

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the coupled parabolic system (4.1)–(4.4) for the first-order corrections $d_1$ and $\sigma_{\pm 1,\beta}$ has a solution with enough regularity, asserted in Section 4.2.2 without proof; every higher-order inductive step inherits the same unstated regularity requirement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any smooth solution of (1.8), the constructed uK approximates the true Allen-Cahn solution in the energy E to order ε^{2k}; the convergence rate is limited only by how many expansion terms one is willing to compute.
  • The radial-symmetry restriction of Bronsard-Stoth is removed and the result holds for all n≥2 with the two-sphere potential, so the same sharp-interface system is available for vector order parameters in higher codimension.
  • The mixed boundary condition b²∂ν ω+ = a²∂ν ω− is derived rather than assumed; it shows that the ratio of the well radii controls how the S^{n-1}-valued field transmits normal derivatives across the interface.
  • The uniform spectral lower bound, once established at the approximate solution, gives the coercivity needed to run an energy method for the full nonlinear error, so the result transfers to perturbations of well-prepared initial data by standard continuation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same construction should work for potentials vanishing on two concentric spheres with any dimensions and without the explicit quartic form, as long as the heteroclinic profile ρ0 and the geodesic \bar ω exist; the key identity Br(ρ0² Br E0)=O(1) depends only on the ratio b²/a² entering the jump condition.
  • A direct testable extension: take the potential with unequal concentric sphere radii a≠b and n=2; the jump condition predicts the tangential component of ∂ν ω at the interface is weighted by b²/a², a quantitative signature that could be observed numerically in a shrinking sphere simulation.
  • The unproved regularity step in Section 4.2.2 suggests the full theorem may require a smallness or compatibility condition on the limit solution (Γt, ω±) for the coupled parabolic system to be solvable; supplying that existence proof would make the arbitrary-order construction unconditional.
  • If the spectral reduction to two scalar 1D operators is generic, the stability of the diffuse interface is governed by the heteroclinic profile alone; this might allow the same lower bound to be proved for non-smooth approximate profiles via a limiting argument, opening a route to the Keller-Rubinstein-Sternberg problem for general manifolds M1, M2.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the sharp-interface limit, as ε→0, of the vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation (1.5) for a radial potential F vanishing on two spheres |u|=a and |u|=b. The claimed limit is the system (1.8): harmonic map heat flow into S^{n-1} in the two bulk phases, mean curvature flow of the interface, and the mixed boundary condition b²∂_ν ω_+ = a²∂_ν ω_- across the interface. The proof is by matched asymptotic expansions: outer expansions in Ω±, an inner expansion with fast variable z=d/ε, an inductive construction of an arbitrary-order approximate solution u_K (Theorem 1.1), a spectral lower bound for the linearized operator around u_K via a reduction to scalar one-dimensional quadratic forms and cross-term/correction estimates (Theorem 1.2), and finally an energy estimate for u^ε - u_K (Theorem 1.3). The paper also records the formal derivation of the jump condition at (3.42).

Significance. If the main results were fully established, this would be a substantial contribution: it extends the Bronsard--Stoth analysis beyond n=2 and removes the radial symmetry assumption, and it gives a mechanism, based on the explicit construction of η_1(z), for handling unequal radii a≠b in the interfacial condition. The reduction of the vector-valued spectral problem to two scalar one-dimensional quadratic forms is an interesting and potentially reusable idea. However, the current manuscript has a load-bearing gap in the inductive construction of the approximate solutions, and the closing arguments of both the spectral proof and the error estimate are incomplete. The significance of the paper is therefore conditional on resolving these issues.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.6, Eqs. (5.18)–(5.19)] The induction for Theorem 1.1 hinges on solving the coupled parabolic system for (d_1, σ±_{1,β}) in §4.2.2 and then the analogous system (4.7) at every order. The text says only: “by trace theorem and basic parabolic estimate of existence, one can then determine d_1|Γ and σ±_{1,β}|Ω±.” This is not a routine step. As the authors themselves note, the d_1 equation (4.1) is nonlinear (see (3.50) and the discussion before (3.51)): L_{1,0} depends on d_1 linearly and the term L_{1,0}∫(d_1−z)η_1 ρ^1_0 dz is quadratic in d_1. The σ± equations (4.2)–(4.3) form a transmission problem with nonlocal mixed Robin-type boundary conditions and contain H(u_1,d_1). No existence theorem, fixed-point argument, smallness condition, or Lopatinski/regularity analysis is supplied, and the required regularity of the traces is not stated. Without a proof of solvability of (4.1)–(4.4) and of each step in (4.7), th
  2. [§6, Eqs. (6.1), (6.6)] The proof of Theorem 1.2 ends with the sentence: “It is enough to estimate (5.18) and (5.19). Theorem 1.2 is derived directly.” The inequalities (5.18)–(5.19) are the claimed reductions, but the paper never carries out the final assembly. One must explicitly combine Lemma 5.7 (or its analogue for every j), Lemma 5.8, Lemma 5.9, and Lemmas 5.4–5.5, and choose the small parameter ν_0 strictly smaller than the coefficient 1/8 in the left-hand sides. The boundary-term estimate at the end of §5.6 also needs to be incorporated. As written, the proof verifies the ingredients but not the claimed scalar inequalities, so the spectral lower bound is not closed. This appears fixable by a careful bookkeeping argument, but it must be written out.
  3. In the error estimate, after defining u_R=(u^ε−u_K)/ε^k, the remainder term is bounded as R=O(ε^{K−1−k}) and then B^i R=O(ε^{K−1−k−i}) is stated after (6.1). With the stated choice K=k+1 this gives no positive power even for i=0 and negative powers for i≥1. The subsequent estimates (6.2)–(6.5) concern only the nonlinear terms ε^{k−2}B^i \hat H; the term ∫ B^i R B^i u_R is not estimated and is absent from (6.6). Thus the differential inequality for E(u_R) is not justified. To close the continuation argument, either the approximate solution must be constructed with enough derivative estimates so that B^i R has a positive power of ε for all i≤⌊m/2⌋+1, or K must be chosen much larger than k plus the number of derivatives. This is a load-bearing issue for Theorem 1.3.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Lemma 5.7] The displayed formula f_B(ρ_0)=ρ_0²/ρ_0 should presumably be ρ_0''/ρ_0. Please correct the notation and verify the subsequent identities.
  2. [Theorem 1.1] Lemma 5.7 is stated only for i=0, j=1, but inequality (5.18) is needed for every j=1,…,n−1. The proof must state that the same estimate holds for all j with E_j replacing E_1, or provide the frame-independent argument.
  3. [Introduction] Theorem 1.1 only states R=O(ε^{K−1}) without specifying the norm or derivative bounds. Section 6 requires estimates on B^i R, so the construction should state explicitly what C^k/H^s controls are obtained for the remainder.
  4. The abstract and introduction invoke the “quasi-minimal connecting orbits” framework from [12], but the actual construction in §3.2 is explicit, using the heteroclinic ρ_0 and a geodesic interpolation. The relation to [12] should be clarified to avoid the impression that a black box is being used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the sharp-interface system is extracted from compatibility conditions, and the spectral bound is proved from the constructed profile; no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's main Theorems 1.1-1.3 are conditional convergence results, not derivations from assumed conclusions. The limit system (1.8) is not an input: the mean curvature equation (3.40) and the mixed boundary condition (3.42) are obtained as solvability (Fredholm) conditions for the inner equations (3.35)-(3.36) via the compatibility conditions in Lemma 3.2, after explicit construction of u0 = \bar\omega(\eta_1(z))\rho_0(z). The special weight \eta_1 is introduced to make the spectral estimate work, and Lemma 5.6 uses the already-derived boundary condition (3.42); this is a proof step, not an assumption of the conclusion. No parameter is fitted to data and then called a prediction; the approximate solution is constructed to satisfy the PDE to O(\varepsilon^{K-1}) by matched expansions. The only self-citation is to Fei-Lin-Wang-Zhang [12] for the 'quasi-minimal connecting orbits' idea; the paper does not rely on a theorem from [12] for the construction—it gives explicit formulas (3.23), (3.27), (3.43)-(3.46) and proves the needed lemmas. Therefore no circular step is present. The noted weakness (Section 4.2.2: 'by trace theorem and basic parabolic estimate of existence...') is an unproved regularity/existence assertion for the coupled parabolic system, which would be a correctness or completeness gap, but it is not circular: it does not identify an output with an input or rename a fit as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new fitted numerical constants, no new fields, and no new entities. The constants a and b are inputs defining the potential; α is a decay-rate threshold chosen from the linearized problem, not fitted. The functions L_{k,0} and L_{k,α} are functional degrees of freedom chosen to satisfy solvability conditions, not empirical parameters.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption There exists a smooth solution (Γt, ω±) of the limit system (1.8) on [0,T] with periodic boundary conditions.
    Theorem 1.1 begins with 'Given a smooth solution...'; without this, no approximate solution or error estimate is defined.
  • domain assumption The one-dimensional heteroclinic problem (3.10) has a solution ρ0 with exponential decay estimates (3.14).
    Invoked in Section 3.1 and Lemma 3.1; existence is cited to [17,28,33,36].
  • domain assumption The coupled parabolic system (4.1)-(4.4) for d1 and σ±_{1,β}, and its induction analogues, is solvable with sufficient regularity.
    Section 4.2.2 asserts this 'by trace theorem and basic parabolic estimate of existence' without proof or reference.
  • domain assumption A smooth orthonormal moving frame {ωbar, ξα} exists on Γ(δ) and satisfies (3.16)-(3.17).
    Used throughout Sections 3 and 5; no construction or existence proof is given beyond smoothness of ω±.
  • domain assumption The first-order variation of the sphere geodesic ωbar at the interface is the linear interpolation of endpoint variations, as used in Lemma 5.6.
    The proof of Lemma 5.6 needs Bν ωbar = η1 Bν ω+ + (1-η1)Bν ω- + O(|dK|²); this is plausible from normal coordinates but is not proved explicitly.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Asymptotic limit of a vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation for phase transition dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3CPQ7UP6

@misc{pith2026250818754,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Asymptotic limit of a vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation for phase transition dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3CPQ7UP6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.18754}
}
abstract

In this paper, we study the asymptotic limit, as $\varepsilon\to 0$, of solutions to a vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation $$ \partial_t u = \Delta u - \frac{1}{\varepsilon^2} \partial_u F(u), $$ where $u: \Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}^n$ and $F(u): \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ is a nonnegative radial function which vanishes precisely on two concentric spheres. This equation, proposed and studied by Bronsard and Stoth [Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 1998] for the case $n=2$, serves as a typical example for a general reaction-diffusion equation introduced by Rubinstein, Sternberg, and Keller to model chemical reactions and diffusions as well as phase transitions. We establish that the sharp interface limit is a two-phase flow system: (i) The interface evolves by mean curvature flow; (ii) Within the bulk phase regions, the solution follows the harmonic map heat flow into $\mathbb{S}^{n-1}$; (iii) Across the interface, the $\mathbb{S}^{n-1}$-valued vectors on the two sides satisfy a mixed boundary condition. Furthermore, we rigorously justify this limit using the matched asymptotic expansion method. First, we employ the idea of ``quasi-minimal connecting orbits'' developed in Fei, Lin, Wang, and Zhang [Invent. Math. 2023] to construct approximated solutions up to arbitrary order. Second, we derive a uniform spectral lower bound for the linearized operator around the approximate solution, which relies on a novel application of the boundary condition. To achieve this, we introduce a suitable decomposition which can reduce the problem to spectral analysis of two scalar one-dimensional linear operators and some singular product estimates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.18754 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The whole procedure to solve the outer and inner expansion systems 4.4. Constructing an approximate solution. In this section, we glue together the inner expan￾sion and the outer expansion to obtain the approximate solutions in the whole region Ω. Firstly, we glue together u ` i and u ´ i by u K o “ ÿ K i“0 ε i pu ` i χΩ` ` u ´ i χΩ´ q, for px, tq P Ω ˘. where χΩ˘ “ " 1, x P Ω ˘, 0, x P other region. Then for px, tq… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [12]

    Fei, M., Lin, F., Wang, W., Zhang, Z.: Matrix-valued Allen-Cahn equation and the Keller-Rubinstein-Sternberg problem. Invent. math. 233, 1-80(2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    Abels, H., Fischer, J., Moser, M.: Approximation of classical two-phase flows of viscous incompressible fluids by a Navier-Stokes/Allen-Cahn system . Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 248, 77-127(2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [2]

    Abels, H., Liu, Y.: Sharp interface limit for a Stokes/Allen-Cahn system . Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 229, 417-502(2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [3]

    Alikakos, N.D., Bates, P.W., Chen, X.: Convergence of the Cahn-Hilliard equation to the Hele-Shaw model . Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 128, 165-205(1994)

    work page 1994

  5. [4]

    Acta Metall

    Allen, S., Cahn, J.: A microscopic theory for antiphase motion and its application to antiphase domain coars- ening. Acta Metall. 27, 1084-1095(1979)

    work page 1979

  6. [5]

    Asymptotics for two-dimensional vectorial Allen-Cahn systems

    Bethuel, F.: Asymptotics for two-dimensional vectorial Allen-Cahn systems . arXiv:2003.10189

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  7. [6]

    Bronsard, L., Kohn, R.V.: Motion by mean curvature limit of Ginzburg-Landau as the singular dynamics . J. Differ. Equ. 237, 211-237(1991)

    work page 1991

  8. [7]

    Bronsard, L., Stoth, B.: The singular limit of a vector-valued reaction-diffusion process . Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 350, 4931-4953(1998)

    work page 1998

Show all 36 references
  1. [8]

    Chen, X.: Generation and propagation of interfaces for reaction-diffusion equations . J. Differ. Equ. 96, 116- 141(1992)

    1992

  2. [9]

    Chen, X.: Spectrum for the Allen-Chan, Chan-Hillard, and phase-field equations for generic interfaces . Comm. Partial Differ. Eqs. 19, 1371-1395(1994)

    1994

  3. [10]

    de Mottoni, P., Schatzman, M.: Geometrical evolution of developed interfaces . Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 347, 1533-1589(1995)

    1995

  4. [11]

    Evans, L.C., Soner, H.M., Souganidis, P.E.: Phase transitions and generalized motion by mean curvature . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 45, 1097-1123(1992)

    1992

  5. [13]

    Fei, M., Wang, W., Zhang, P., Zhang, Z.: Dynamics of the nematic-isotropic sharp interface for the liquid crystal. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 75, 1700-1724(2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    Peking Math

    Fei, M., Wang, W., Zhang, P., Zhang, Z.: On the isotropic-nematic phase transition for the liquid crystal . Peking Math. Jour. 1, 141-219(2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Fischer, J., Laux, T., Simon, T.M.: Convergence rates of the Allen-Cahn equation to mean curvature flow: a short proof based on relative entropies , SIAM J. Math. Anal. 52(6), 6222-6233(2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Fischer, J., Marveggio, A.: Quantitative convergence of the vectorial Allen-Cahn equation towards multiphase mean curvature flow . Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire. 41(5), 1117-1178(2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Fonseca, I., Tartar, L.: The gradient theory of phase transitions for systems with two potential wells . Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A 111, 89-102(1989)

    1989

  10. [18]

    Ilmanen, T.: Convergence of the Allen-Cahn equation to Brakke motion by mean curvature . J. Differ. Geom. 38, 417-461(1993)

    1993

  11. [19]

    Laux, T., Liu, Y.: Nematic-isotropic phase transition in liquid crystals: a variational derivation of effective geometric motions. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 241, 1785-1814(2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Laux, T., Simon, T.M.: Convergence of the Allen-Cahn equation to multiphase mean curvature flow . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 71, 1597-1647(2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Lin, F.-H.: Some dynamical properties of Ginzburg-Landau vortices . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 49, 323–359(1996)

    1996

  14. [22]

    Lin, F.-H.: Complex Ginzburg-Landau equations and dynamics of vortices, filaments, and codimension-2 sub- manifolds. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 51, 385-441(1998)

    1998

  15. [23]

    Lin, F.-H., Pan, X., Wang, C.: Phase transition for potentials of high-dimensional wells . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 65, 0833-0888(2012)

    2012

  16. [24]

    Lin, F.-H., Wang, C.: Harmonic maps in connection of phase transitions with higher dimensional potential wells. Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B 40, 781-810(2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Lin, F.-H., Wang, C.: Isotropic-nematic phase transition and liquid crystal droplets . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 76, 1728-1792(2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Modica, L.: The gradient theory of phase transitions and the minimal interface criterion . Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 98, 123-142(1987)

    1987

  19. [27]

    Modica, L., Mortola, S.: Il limite nella Γ-convergenza di una famiglia di funzionali ellittici . Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. A (5) 14, 526-529(1977) 44 HUAN DONG AND WEI W ANG

    1977

  20. [28]

    Monteil, A., Santambrogio, F.: Metric methods for heteroclinic connections . Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 41, 1019-1024(2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Asymptot

    Moser, M.: Convergence of the scalar- and vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation to mean curvature flow with 90˝-contact angle in higher dimensions, part I: convergence result . Asymptot. Anal. 3-4(131), 297-383(2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Majumdar, A., Milewski, P.A., Spicer, A.: Front propagation at the nematic-isotropic transition temperature . SIAM J. Appl. Math. 76, 1296-1320(2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Rubinstein, J., Sternberg, P., Keller, J.: Fast reaction, slow diffusion, and curve shortening . SIAM J. Appl. Math. 49, 116-133(1989)

    1989

  24. [32]

    Rubinstein, J., Sternberg, P., Keller, J.: Reaction-diffusion processes and evolution to harmonic maps . SIAM J. Appl. Math. 49, 1722-1733(1989)

    1989

  25. [33]

    Sternberg, P.: The effect of a singular perturbation on nonconvex variational problems . Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 101, 209-260(1988)

    1988

  26. [34]

    Wang, W., Zhang, P., Zhang, Z.: Rigorous derivation from Landau-de Gennes theory to Ericksen-Leslie theory . SIAM J. Math. Anal. 47, 127-158(2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Wang, W., Zhang, P., Zhang, Z.: The small Deborah number limit of the Doi-Onsager equation to the Ericksen- Leslie equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 68, 1326-1398(2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    Zuniga, A., Sternberg, P.: On the heteroclinic connection problem for multi-well gradient systems . J. Differ. Equ. 261, 3987-4007(2016) Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China Email address : huandong@math.pku.edu.cn Department of Mathematics, Z...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.