Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 1 minor 103 references

Where Do the Returns to Schooling Come From? Educational Transitions and Labor Market Payoffs

T0 review · 4 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The payoff to high school completion in the NLSY97 cohort is overwhelmingly the direct labor-market value of the degree, not the college attendance, completion, or graduate schooling it enables.

desk verdict Abstract announces an interesting causal mediation framework for schooling returns, but the full text is an unrelated physics paper by a different author, so the submission is unreviewable as is. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.13366 v3 pith:3EDKSG7N submitted 2025-08-18 stat.AP econ.GNq-fin.ECstat.ME

Aleksei Opacic This is my paper
classification stat.APecon.GNq-fin.ECstat.ME
keywords causalmediationeducationaltransitionsdecompositionofaveragetreatmenteffectdirectandindirecteffectsreturnstoschoolinghighschoolcompletionNLSY97sequentialignorability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to change how education's effect on earnings is measured: instead of treating education as a single point-in-time treatment, it models education as a sequence of transitions, such as high school completion, college attendance, college completion, and graduate school. It proves that the average treatment effect of any one transition can be split into additive, mutually exclusive parts: a direct part that operates net of later transitions, and indirect parts that run through each later transition. Applied to high school completion in the NLSY97 cohort, the decomposition reports that the degree's earnings payoff is overwhelmingly direct. The indirect part is small not because college has no effect, but because the counterfactual progression rates through college among high school completers are low. The framework is offered as one that needs less restrictive identification assumptions than standard mediation decompositions.

What carries the argument

The central object is a causal mediation decomposition defined over an ordered sequence of educational transitions. Rather than a single treatment indicator, the treatment is the first transition; the mediators are the subsequent transitions, each of which can itself be a treatment. The decomposition writes the ATE as a sum of path-specific effects, one direct path and one per downstream transition, with special properties that distinguish it from conventional mediation decompositions and, the paper argues, allow less restrictive identification assumptions and identification of all causal paths.

What would settle it

One could test the claim by re-estimating the decomposition on data where a compulsory-schooling reform exogenously raises high school completion while leaving college plans unchanged; if the estimated direct component diverges sharply from the paper's NLSY97 decomposition, the framework's identifying assumptions fail, and if the indirect component becomes large, the 'direct dominates' conclusion does not generalize.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the average treatment effect (ATE) of a given educational transition is additively decomposable into mutually exclusive components corresponding to the direct effect (net of all downstream transitions) and the indirect effects that operate through each subsequent transition, namely college attendance, college completion, and graduate school attendance. For the specific case of high school completion in the NLSY97 cohort, the paper finds that the direct component 'overwhelmingly' accounts for the return: the degree itself, rather than the further education it sets in motion, is where the earnings payoff lies. The smallness of the indirect components reflects low coun

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, after conditioning on observed covariates and the individual's earlier educational transitions, each subsequent transition is as good as randomly assigned with respect to both the outcome and the mediator-outcome relationship—that nothing unmeasured jointly drives the later schooling choice and later earnings.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the direct effect dominates, policy that raises high school completion itself should be the primary lever for earnings gains; inducing more college attendance among completers would capture only a small share of the degree's return.
  • The decomposition gives an interpretable quantity—the credential's market value net of further schooling—that can be compared across degrees, cohorts, and settings.
  • The framework reframes the years-of-schooling estimate: a one-year increase actually mixes a set of transition effects, and the new decomposition separates them.
  • The result implies that the signaling or human-capital content of the high school credential itself, not the college pipeline, carries the earnings return in this cohort.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the direct component really is dominant, the likely mechanisms are credential signaling or the basic skills acquired by high school completion itself; the paper does not separate these.
  • The indirect share could be larger in cohorts or countries where counterfactual college progression rates are higher; the NLSY97 result may be specific to that cohort's educational environment.
  • The same sequential decomposition could be applied to postsecondary degrees, where the downstream transitions differ, or to non-educational sequences such as job training followed by occupational mobility.
  • A natural test is to apply the framework to data with a plausibly exogenous source of variation in high school completion, such as a compulsory schooling reform, and compare the estimated direct component with a standard instrumental-variable estimate of the degree effect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper's abstract announces a causal mediation framework for educational transitions, an additive decomposition of the average treatment effect (ATE) of schooling into direct and indirect components, 'less restrictive identification assumptions', and an NLSY97 application showing that the return to a high school degree is overwhelmingly direct. The full text supplied for review, however, is an unrelated physics manuscript, 'Long-lived quasinormal modes in the Euler-Heisenberg electrodynamics' (arXiv:2508.13361v2). It contains no equations for the claimed decomposition, no identification assumptions, no NLSY97 data analysis, and no results on returns to schooling. The only link to the abstracted topic is the arXiv identifier in the header, which itself differs from the abstract's identifier (13366 vs 13361).

Significance. If the claimed framework and empirical findings were actually present and correct, the paper would be a potentially substantive contribution to the causal mediation literature in education: an additive decomposition of the ATE into direct and indirect effects with weaker identification requirements than standard sequential-ignorability approaches, plus a substantive application to the NLSY97. These results could inform debates about the channels through which educational credentials affect earnings. However, because the submitted body text is a completely different paper on black-hole quasinormal modes, there is no evidence in the manuscript to support any of these claims. The potential significance is therefore entirely unassessed and, based on the supplied text, unsupported.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full text (all sections)] The full text is a physics paper on quasinormal modes in Euler-Heisenberg electrodynamics, not the causal mediation paper promised in the abstract. There are no equations, derivations, proofs, identification assumptions, or data analyses related to educational transitions and earnings. The central claims of the abstract are therefore unsupported by the manuscript body. This is a load-bearing problem, not a presentation issue: the entire substance of the claimed contribution is absent.
  2. [Abstract / expected 'decomposition'] The abstract states that the ATE 'can be additively decomposed into mutually exclusive components' containing direct and indirect effects, and that the decomposition has 'special properties' facilitating less restrictive identification. No theorem, proof, or formal statement of the decomposition is provided anywhere in the supplied text. Without this, the central methodological claim cannot be evaluated or reproduced.
  3. [Abstract / expected 'identification assumptions'] The abstract claims 'less restrictive identification assumptions' and identification of 'all causal paths in the decomposition,' but no identification conditions are stated. In particular, there is no discussion of sequential ignorability, mediator confounding, or the conditions under which the direct and indirect components are identified from observational data such as the NLSY97. The manuscript therefore provides no basis for assessing the validity of the reported empirical decomposition.
  4. [Abstract / reported NLSY97 finding] The abstract reports that 'the payoff to a high school degree stems overwhelmingly from its direct labor market returns' and that mediation through subsequent transitions is small 'because of individuals' low counterfactual progression rates.' No NLSY97 analysis, estimation procedure, sample description, or results tables appear anywhere in the manuscript. The empirical claim is entirely unverifiable from the submitted materials.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Header / identifier mismatch] The header of the full text shows arXiv:2508.13361v2 [gr-qc], while the manuscript under review is listed as arXiv:2508.13366 (stat.AP). This identifier mismatch reinforces that the body text is a different paper, and should be corrected or the correct manuscript resubmitted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; the claimed mediation derivation is absent from the supplied full text, not circular.

full rationale

The abstract promises a causal mediation decomposition of the average treatment effect of education and an NLSY97 application. The full text supplied, however, is arXiv:2508.13361, a physics paper on quasinormal modes in Euler-Heisenberg electrodynamics. It contains no definition of educational transitions, no mediation decomposition, no identification assumptions, and no NLSY97 analysis. Circularity requires exhibiting a specific reduction such as Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. No such reduction can be identified because the claimed derivation chain is entirely absent from the submitted body. The mismatch means the abstract's central claims are unsupported by the provided manuscript, but unsupported is not circular. Under the rule that circularity must be demonstrated by quotation and explicit reduction, the honest finding is no circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger is nearly empty because the supplied text does not provide the framework's equations, parameters, or assumptions. The only identifiable load-bearing premise is the unconfoundedness assumption for educational transitions, which is stated only in the abstract's framing.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Sequential ignorability: conditional on observed covariates and prior educational transitions, subsequent transitions and earnings are unconfounded.
    The abstract's causal mediation decomposition requires some version of no unmeasured confounding for mediator and outcome pathways; the abstract claims 'less restrictive identification assumptions' but does not specify them. This is the load-bearing premise for causal interpretation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Where Do the Returns to Schooling Come From? Educational Transitions and Labor Market Payoffs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3EDKSG7N

@misc{pith2026250813366,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Where Do the Returns to Schooling Come From? Educational Transitions and Labor Market Payoffs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3EDKSG7N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.13366}
}
read the original abstract

Conventional research on educational effects typically either employs a "years of schooling" measure of education, or dichotomizes attainment as a point-in-time treatment. Yet, such a conceptualization of education is misaligned with the sequential process by which individuals make educational transitions. In this paper, I propose a causal mediation framework for the study of educational effects on outcomes such as earnings. The framework considers the effect of a given educational transition as operating indirectly, via progression through subsequent transitions, as well as directly, net of these transitions. I demonstrate that the average treatment effect (ATE) of education can be additively decomposed into mutually exclusive components that capture these direct and indirect effects. The decomposition has several special properties which distinguish it from conventional mediation decompositions of the ATE, properties which facilitate less restrictive identification assumptions as well as identification of all causal paths in the decomposition. An analysis of the returns to high school completion in the NLSY97 cohort suggests that the payoff to a high school degree stems overwhelmingly from its direct labor market returns. Mediation via college attendance, completion and graduate school attendance is small because of individuals' low counterfactual progression rates through these subsequent transitions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Heisenberg and H

    W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Z. Phys.98, 714 (1936), arXiv:physics/0605038

    arXiv 1936

  2. [2]

    Karplus and M

    R. Karplus and M. Neuman, Phys. Rev.83, 776 (1951)

    1951

  3. [3]

    d’Enterria and G

    D. d’Enterria and G. G. da Silveira, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 080405 (2013), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 116, 129901 (2016)], arXiv:1305.7142 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2013

  4. [4]

    Tumasyanet al.(TOTEM, CMS), Phys

    A. Tumasyanet al.(TOTEM, CMS), Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 011801 (2022), arXiv:2110.05916 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    S. V. Bolokhov, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 634 (2024), arXiv:2404.09364 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Nomura and D

    K. Nomura and D. Yoshida, Phys. Rev. D105, 044006 (2022), arXiv:2111.06273 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Bretón and L

    N. Bretón and L. A. López, Phys. Rev. D104, 024064 (2021), arXiv:2105.12283 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Breton and L

    N. Breton and L. A. Lopez, Phys. Rev. D94, 104008 (2016), arXiv:1607.02476 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2016

Show all 103 references
  1. [9]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 793 (2011), arXiv:1102.4014 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  2. [10]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Living Rev. Rel.2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058

    1999 arXiv

  3. [11]

    S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, (2025), arXiv:2504.05014 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. V. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B609, 377 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0411059

    2005 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Ohashi and M.-a

    A. Ohashi and M.-a. Sakagami, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 3973 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407009

    2004 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Ponglertsakul and B

    S. Ponglertsakul and B. Gwak, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 1023 (2020), arXiv:2007.16108 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D73, 124040 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0605013

    2006 arXiv

  8. [16]

    P. A. González, E. Papantonopoulos, J. Saavedra, and Y. Vásquez, JHEP06, 150 (2022), arXiv:2204.01570 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Burikham, S

    P. Burikham, S. Ponglertsakul, and L. Tannukij, Phys. Rev. D96, 124001 (2017), arXiv:1709.02716 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Malik, Int

    Z. Malik, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39, 2450024 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlík, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D98, 104033 (2018), arXiv:1808.03346 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [20]

    W. Deng, W. Liu, F. Long, K. Xiao, and J. Jing, (2025), arXiv:2507.13978 [gr-qc]. 14

    2025

  13. [21]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D97, 084034 (2018), arXiv:1712.06667 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Bécar, P

    R. Bécar, P. A. González, E. Papantonopoulos, and Y. Vásquez, Phys. Rev. D111, 124013 (2025), arXiv:2505.17161 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  15. [23]

    C. Chen, J. Jing, Z. Cao, and M. Wang, (2025), arXiv:2506.14635 [gr-qc]

    2025

  16. [24]

    Zhidenko, Phys

    A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D74, 064017 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0607133

    2006 arXiv

  17. [25]

    R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Rev. D73, 024009 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0509026

    2006 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Zhang, J

    M. Zhang, J. Jiang, and Z. Zhong, Phys. Lett. B789, 13 (2019), arXiv:1811.04183 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Aragón, R

    A. Aragón, R. Bécar, P. A. González, and Y. Vásquez, Phys. Rev. D103, 064006 (2021), arXiv:2009.09436 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    S. S. Seahra, C. Clarkson, and R. Maartens, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 121302 (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0408032

    2005

  21. [29]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B853, 138685 (2024), arXiv:2307.01110 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys

    A. Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L11 (2023), arXiv:2306.16219 [astro- ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    T. V. Fernandes, D. Hilditch, J. P. S. Lemos, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D105, 044017 (2022), arXiv:2112.03282 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Percival and S

    J. Percival and S. R. Dolan, Phys. Rev. D102, 104055 (2020), arXiv:2008.10621 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D88, 024054 (2013), arXiv:1307.1812 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  26. [34]

    A. F. Zinhailo, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 992 (2018), arXiv:1809.03913 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  27. [35]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. F. Zinhailo, and Z. Stuchlík, Phys. Rev. D99, 124042 (2019), arXiv:1903.03483 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [36]

    M. S. Churilova, Phys. Rev. D102, 024076 (2020), arXiv:2002.03450 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  29. [37]

    S. V. Bolokhov, Phys. Rev. D110, 024010 (2024), arXiv:2311.05503 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    M. S. Churilova, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B802, 135207 (2020), arXiv:1911.05246 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Jing, Phys

    J. Jing, Phys. Rev. D72, 027501 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0408090

    2005 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Koyama and A

    H. Koyama and A. Tomimatsu, Phys. Rev. D65, 084031 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0112075

    2002 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Moderski and M

    R. Moderski and M. Rogatko, Phys. Rev. D64, 044024 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0105056

    2001 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Rogatko and A

    M. Rogatko and A. Szyplowska, Phys. Rev. D76, 044010 (2007)

    2007

  35. [43]

    Koyama and A

    H. Koyama and A. Tomimatsu, Phys. Rev. D64, 044014 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0103086

    2001 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Koyama and A

    H. Koyama and A. Tomimatsu, Phys. Rev. D63, 064032 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0012022. 15

    2001 arXiv

  37. [45]

    G. W. Gibbons, M. Rogatko, and A. Szyplowska, Phys. Rev. D77, 064024 (2008), arXiv:0802.3259 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  38. [46]

    G. W. Gibbons and M. Rogatko, Phys. Rev. D77, 044034 (2008), arXiv:0801.3130 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  39. [47]

    R. A. Konoplya and R. D. B. Fontana, Phys. Lett. B659, 375 (2008), arXiv:0707.1156 [hep- th]

    2008 arXiv

  40. [48]

    R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Lett. B666, 283 (2008), arXiv:0801.0846 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Wu and R

    C. Wu and R. Xu, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 391 (2015), arXiv:1507.04911 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  42. [50]

    K. D. Kokkotas, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D83, 024031 (2011), arXiv:1011.1843 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  43. [51]

    A. F. Zinhailo, Phys. Lett. B853, 138682 (2024), arXiv:2403.06867 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Richartz and D

    M. Richartz and D. Giugno, Phys. Rev. D90, 124011 (2014), arXiv:1409.7440 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  45. [53]

    L. M. Burko and G. Khanna, Phys. Rev. D70, 044018 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0403018

    2004 arXiv

  46. [54]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, and C. Molina, Phys. Rev. D75, 084004 (2007), arXiv:gr- qc/0602047

    2007

  47. [55]

    Magos and N

    D. Magos and N. Bretón, Phys. Rev. D102, 084011 (2020), arXiv:2009.05904 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Patrick, A

    S. Patrick, A. Coutant, M. Richartz, and S. Weinfurtner, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 061101 (2018), arXiv:1801.08473 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  49. [57]

    E. W. Leaver, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A402, 285 (1985)

    1985

  50. [58]

    Nollert, Phys

    H.-P. Nollert, Phys. Rev. D47, 5253 (1993)

    1993

  51. [59]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, JHEP06, 037 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0402080

    2004 arXiv

  52. [60]

    O. J. C. Dias, M. Godazgar, and J. E. Santos, JHEP07, 076 (2022), arXiv:2205.13072 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Stuchlík and A

    Z. Stuchlík and A. Zhidenko, (2025), arXiv:2506.09829 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Xiong and P.-C

    W. Xiong and P.-C. Li, Phys. Rev. D108, 044064 (2023), arXiv:2305.04040 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Kanti, R

    P. Kanti, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D74, 064008 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0607048

    2006

  56. [64]

    A. F. Zinhailo, (2024), 10.13140/RG.2.2.26785.01124

    2024

  57. [65]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D76, 084018 (2007), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 029901 (2014)], arXiv:0707.1890 [hep-th]

    2007 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Stuchlík and A

    Z. Stuchlík and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D112, 024064 (2025), arXiv:2503.06775 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Zhu, S.-J

    Z. Zhu, S.-J. Zhang, C. E. Pellicer, B. Wang, and E. Abdalla, Phys. Rev. D90, 044042 (2014), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 049904 (2014)], arXiv:1405.4931 [hep-th]. 16

    2014 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Aneesh, S

    S. Aneesh, S. Bose, and S. Kar, Phys. Rev. D97, 124004 (2018), arXiv:1803.10204 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  61. [69]

    K. A. Bronnikov, R. A. Konoplya, and T. D. Pappas, Phys. Rev. D103, 124062 (2021), arXiv:2102.10679 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Dubinsky and A

    A. Dubinsky and A. Zinhailo, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 847 (2024), arXiv:2404.01834 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Dubinsky, EPL147, 19003 (2024), arXiv:2403.01883 [gr-qc]

    A. Dubinsky, EPL147, 19003 (2024), arXiv:2403.01883 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    K. A. Bronnikov and R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Rev. D101, 064004 (2020), arXiv:1912.05315 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Abdalla, O

    E. Abdalla, O. P. F. Piedra, F. S. Nuñez, and J. de Oliveira, Phys. Rev. D88, 064035 (2013), arXiv:1211.3390 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Varghese and V

    N. Varghese and V. C. Kuriakose, Gen. Rel. Grav.43, 2757 (2011), arXiv:1011.6608 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  67. [75]

    M. S. Churilova, R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlik, and A. Zhidenko, JCAP10, 010 (2021), arXiv:2107.05977 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  68. [76]

    M. A. Cuyubamba, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D93, 104053 (2016), arXiv:1604.03604 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Dubinsky, Int

    A. Dubinsky, Int. J. Theor. Phys.64, 203 (2025)

    2025

  70. [78]

    Skvortsova, Grav

    M. Skvortsova, Grav. Cosmol.30, 279 (2024), arXiv:2405.15807 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Skvortsova, Fortsch

    M. Skvortsova, Fortsch. Phys.72, 2400132 (2024), arXiv:2405.06390 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Skvortsova, EPL149, 59001 (2025), arXiv:2503.03650 [gr-qc]

    M. Skvortsova, EPL149, 59001 (2025), arXiv:2503.03650 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Skvortsova, Fortsch

    M. Skvortsova, Fortsch. Phys.72, 2400036 (2024), arXiv:2311.11650 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  74. [82]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D89, 024011 (2014), arXiv:1309.7667 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  75. [83]

    S. V. Bolokhov, Phys. Lett. B856, 138879 (2024), arXiv:2310.12326 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  76. [84]

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, (2025), arXiv:2505.06966 [gr-qc]

    2025

  77. [85]

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, JCAP06, 057 (2025), arXiv:2504.09323 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  78. [86]

    B. F. Schutz and C. M. Will, Astrophys. J. Lett.291, L33 (1985)

    1985

  79. [87]

    Iyer and C

    S. Iyer and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D35, 3621 (1987)

    1987

  80. [88]

    R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Rev. D68, 024018 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0303052

    2003 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Matyjasek and M

    J. Matyjasek and M. Opala, Phys. Rev. D96, 024011 (2017), arXiv:1704.00361 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Matyjasek, Phys

    J. Matyjasek, Phys. Rev. D104, 084066 (2021), arXiv:2107.04815 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Kodama, R

    H. Kodama, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D81, 044007 (2010), arXiv:0904.2154 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Malik, Int

    Z. Malik, Int. J. Theor. Phys.63, 199 (2024), arXiv:2308.10412 [gr-qc]. 17

    2024 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Malik, Annals Phys.479, 170046 (2025), arXiv:2409.01561 [gr-qc]

    Z. Malik, Annals Phys.479, 170046 (2025), arXiv:2409.01561 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  86. [94]

    R. A. Konoplya and E. Abdalla, Phys. Rev. D71, 084015 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0503029

    2005 arXiv

  87. [95]

    R. A. Konoplya, Gen. Rel. Grav.34, 329 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0109096

    2002 arXiv

  88. [96]

    S. V. Bolokhov, Phys. Rev. D109, 064017 (2024)

    2024

  89. [97]

    Paul, Eur

    P. Paul, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 218 (2024), arXiv:2312.16479 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  90. [98]

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 486 (2025), arXiv:2503.16087 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  91. [99]

    R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Lett. B823, 136734 (2021), arXiv:2109.01640 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Dubinsky, International Journal of Gravitation and Theoretical Physics1, 2 (2025), arXiv:2507.00256 [gr-qc]

    A. Dubinsky, International Journal of Gravitation and Theoretical Physics1, 2 (2025), arXiv:2507.00256 [gr-qc]

    2025

  93. [101]

    S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, International Journal of Gravitation and Theoretical Physics1, 3 (2025), arXiv:2507.07196 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  94. [102]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, and A. F. Zinhailo, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 155002 (2019), arXiv:1904.10333 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  95. [103]

    R. H. Price, Phys. Rev. D5, 2419 (1972). 18

    1972

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.