Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 183 references

Fast Wave-optics Rendering of Multiplane Images for 3D Holographic Displays

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A new rendering pipeline converts multiplane images into random-phase holograms, matching primitive-based CGH quality while running up to 250,000× faster.

desk verdict A plausible and useful pipeline paper: MPI-to-hologram via random-phase wave compositing, with a credible speedup claim and decent validation, but the load-bearing compositing law is adopted without derivation or error bounds and the headline speedup excludes upstream costs. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.19731 v1 pith:3EH7UPDO submitted 2026-07-22 cs.GR cs.ETcs.MMeess.IVeess.SP

Brian Chao , Dario Seyb , Nathan Matsuda , Oliver Cossairt , Yang Zhou , Douglas Lanman , Gordon Wetzstein , Grace Kuo
show 1 more author
Changwon Jang
This is my paper
classification cs.GRcs.ETcs.MMeess.IVeess.SP
keywords multiplaneimagescomputer-generatedholographyrandom-phasehologramswave-opticsrenderingangularspectrummethodtimemultiplexinglightfieldfocalstack
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Multiplane images (MPIs) are a layered 3D representation—a stack of RGBA images at discrete depths—that neural rendering has made easy to acquire, yet until now they have been viewed as 2D pictures. This paper proposes a wave-optics rendering pipeline that treats each MPI layer as a random-phase amplitude mask and sequentially propagates and composites the layers into a complex hologram at the display plane. The central claim is that this MPI-based CGH achieves the image quality of primitive-based computer-generated holography (which must composite millions of individual Gaussian or polygon wavefronts) while running up to 250,000× faster, and that it avoids the defocus and occlusion artifacts of RGBD-based layer CGH. This matters because holographic near-eye displays need an efficient path from casually captured or neural-rendered scene content to the patterns on a spatial light modulator, and MPIs are a compact, readily available intermediate format for front-facing scenes. The paper supports the claim with simulated focal stacks and light fields, benchtop captures on a phase-only SLM, and a demonstration with neural-network-predicted MPIs.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the sequential wavefront compositing rule in Eq. 2, adopted from the authors' earlier random-phase wave-splatting work. It defines how the accumulated field from deeper layers is attenuated by the current layer's transmittance √(1−α_i) and amplitude-weighted by √α_i with a random phase e^{iφ_i} before both are propagated by the angular spectrum method across the inter-layer gap. The rule is what turns an RGBA stack into a complex hologram in a single forward pass, and its correctness is what makes the natural-defocus, occlusion, and RPWS-parity results follow. The accompanying time-multiplexing rule (Eq. 3) averages intensities over T independent random-phase rende

What would settle it

Render a scene with a sharp occlusion boundary as both an MPI hologram and a primitive-based reference hologram, then capture focal slices at several depths on a benchtop display and compare the intensity profile across the edge; visible ringing or light leakage in the MPI case but not in the reference would refute the compositing law.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At the paper's core is the recursive compositing equation u_{i-1} = P( √(1−α_i) u_i + √c_i √α_i e^{iφ_i}; Δz ), which takes the accumulated complex field from the far side of the stack, propagates it across the inter-layer gap with the angular spectrum method, and blends in the current layer's color weighted by the square root of its opacity and multiplied by a layer-specific random phase. Iterating from the backmost to the frontmost layer produces the full complex wavefront at the SLM plane. Repeated with different random phase maps and time-averaged, the pipeline reconstructs 3D focal stacks and 4D light fields with natural defocus, parallax, and occlusion. The paper's discovery is that a

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on Eq. 2: that a partially transparent MPI layer behaves in wave optics as an amplitude mask with transmittance √α carrying a random phase—a law taken from earlier work without derivation or direct physical measurement in this paper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Scenes already represented as MPIs—whether from optimized splats, stereo networks, or single-image predictors—can be turned into holograms without per-scene optimization.
  • Runtime scales about linearly with the number of depth planes, and perceptual quality saturates near 30 layers, making a ~30-layer MPI a practical operating point for interactive displays.
  • Time multiplexing of independent random-phase renders reduces speckle contrast and expands the eyebox, improving space–bandwidth product utilization.
  • MPI holograms eliminate the halo, light-leakage, and dark-border occlusion artifacts that RGBD-based layer CGH exhibits at depth transitions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's quantitative MPI evaluations are built mostly from binning optimized Gaussian splats (Eq. 4), so the claim that the pipeline is agnostic to MPI acquisition rests on a single qualitative neural-network demo; a systematic benchmark with predicted MPIs would directly test the motivating use case.
  • If Eq. 2 holds as a physical model, the same compositing scheme should transfer to other layered representations—layered depth images, alpha-matted RGBD, or learned layered radiance fields—with the same cost model, but the paper does not test these extensions.
  • Because the per-layer cost is essentially two Fourier transforms (propagation and composite), pairing the pipeline with a neural MPI predictor that emits 16–30 planes is the most direct route to real-time CGH; the paper identifies this direction but does not demonstrate it.
  • The paper inherits a known weakness of random-phase holograms—reduced image contrast—and mentions learning-based calibration as a remedy, but offers no quantitative measurement of the contrast cost or eyebox gain as T varies; a characterization experiment would help system designers choose T.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a wave-optics CGH pipeline that converts multiplane images (MPIs) into random-phase complex holograms via recursive back-to-front propagation and compositing (Eq. 2), with optional time multiplexing (Eq. 3). The claimed contributions are (1) an efficient direct CGH algorithm for MPIs that achieves up to 250,000× speedup over the primitive-based RPWS baseline while maintaining comparable reconstructed focal-stack and light-field quality, and (2) a detailed evaluation against RGBD layer-based and Gaussian-based methods. The method is validated on synthetic and captured benchtop results, including a demonstration with a neural-network MPI predictor (Stereo Magnification). The central claim is that MPI-based CGH offers the speed of RGBD methods and the quality of Gaussian primitive methods.

Significance. If validated, this is a significant advance: it links readily available neural-rendering representations (MPIs) to holographic displays, potentially enabling interactive CGH from casually captured scenes. The paper is clearly written and contains reproducible elements (source code/to-be-released datasets, PyTorch implementations, benchtop captures). The experimental captures in Fig. 8 are noteworthy, and the inclusion of a neural-MPI predictor in Fig. 6 strengthens the claim of representation agnosticism. However, the quantitative support for the headline speed/quality tradeoff is not fully rigorous, and the physical model underlying the recursion is imported from prior work without derivation or error analysis in this manuscript.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3 and Sec. 4.2.1] The recursive compositing law u_{i-1} = P( sqrt(1−α_i) u_i + sqrt(c_i) sqrt(α_i) e^{i φ_i}; Δz ) is the physical core of the paper, yet it is adopted from “recently proposed” work [Chao et al. 2025] with no derivation, no statement of the domain of validity for semi-transparent MPI planes, and no error bound. The paper itself acknowledges in Sec. 5 that “random phase leads to lower contrast” but does not quantify this or provide a contrast/speckle analysis vs. T or α. Since the claims of natural defocus, occlusion, and parity with RPWS all rest on this law, the paper should either derive it directly from wave optics or provide a quantitative validation (e.g., comparing against brute-force wave-propagation through a discretized volume for representative scenes, or bounding the interference error for finite T). As written, the physical correctness of the central quality claim is not self-c
  2. [Fig. 3 and Sec. 4.2.1] The headline 250,000× speedup is computed from the CGH propagation/compositing runtime only. The time to extract MPIs from Gaussian splats using Eq. 4, and the SGD-based phase-only encoding step (Sec. 4.1.4), are excluded. If the comparison is intended to reflect end-to-end hologram synthesis from a scene representation, the preprocessing costs should be included or explicitly excluded with a clear statement. The paper should report total pipeline times for a representative scene for all methods, so the reader can assess the practical speedup.
  3. [Sec. 4.1.2] Quantitative metrics (PSNR, SSIM) are reported only as averages over “selected scenes,” without per-scene values, standard deviations, or statistical significance tests. The claim that MPI “matches RPWS in SSIM” is not supported if the difference is within measurement noise. Please provide a per-scene breakdown (e.g., table or box plot) and state the number of scenes and selection criteria. This is essential to substantiate the core quality parity claim.
  4. [Sec. 4.1.2] The evaluation uses MPIs extracted from pre-optimized Gaussian splats via Eq. 4, not MPIs produced by the neural predictors that motivate the work. Fig. 6 shows only a qualitative example with Stereo Magnification. The paper should either provide quantitative results on neural-network MPIs (even a few scenes) or discuss explicitly how the Gaussian-splat-derived MPIs may differ in opacity/color statistics and therefore limit the generalization of the quality claims.
minor comments (5)
  1. [General] Typo: “addtionally” should be “additially” or “additionally.”
  2. [Abstract and Fig. 3] The 250,000× speedup corresponds to the lowest layer count (4) and should be reported together with the scaling: at 512 layers the speedup is far smaller. Please clarify in the abstract or the figure caption that this is a best-case value.
  3. [Sec. 4.1.4] The phase-only encoding step (SGD with complex loss) is an additional cost that is common to all compared methods. Please state explicitly that the reported speedup applies to complex-valued hologram generation, not to the phase-encoding step.
  4. [Sec. 4.2.1] The paper fixes T=24 for time multiplexing without an ablation. Since the random-phase compositing law converges to the target intensity only in expectation, please provide a brief study of the effect of T on image quality and runtime, or at least a sentence justifying the choice.
  5. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption states “matching RPWS in SSIM,” but the plotted MPI SSIM appears slightly lower than RPWS. Clarify whether “matching” is meant perceptually or statistically, and adjust the wording accordingly.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Core wave-compositing law is adopted via a load-bearing self-citation, but the pipeline is otherwise externally validated.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3.2, Eq. (2)]
    "we propagate the resulting wavefront across the inter-layer gap Δz=z_{i−1}−z_i to the subsequent plane i−1 using the angular spectrum method [Goodman 2005] and composite them using a recently proposed wave optics alpha blending formulation for random-phase wavefronts [Chao et al. 2025]: u^{(t)}_{i−1}(x)=P( sqrt(1−α_i(x)) u_i(x)+ sqrt(c_i) sqrt(α_i(x)) e^{iφ^{(t)}_i(x)}; Δz )"

    Eq. (2) is the only mechanism converting MPI alpha/color into holograms, so the paper's central claims of natural defocus, occlusion, and parity with RPWS stand or fall on this law. The paper gives no derivation, contrast bound, or speckle analysis for the sqrt(1−α)/sqrt(α) split; the only justification offered is a citation to the authors' own RPWS paper (Chao et al. 2025). The law is constructed so that time-averaged intensity reproduces standard alpha compositing, so the quality comparison is partly inherited from the same compositing target used to build the inputs; in any case, the physical validity is imported from a same-group reference rather than derived or independently verified here.

full rationale

The paper contains no parameter fitted to the target result: layer counts, random phase masks, and T=24 are fixed, and the experimental focal stacks/light fields are captured, not solved for. The speedup claim is structural (a handful of plane propagations vs millions of primitives) and credible. The pipeline is also shown to work with an off-the-shelf neural MPI predictor (Stereo Magnification, Zhou et al. 2018) and on public Mip-NeRF 360 and NeRF Blender scenes, which is external grounding. The main circularity concern is Eq. (2): it is adopted from the authors' prior RPWS work via self-citation and is load-bearing for every physical-quality claim, with no derivation or error bound in the present text. That justifies a moderate score, but not a higher one because the central contribution (MPI-to-hologram pipeline plus time multiplexing/evaluation) has independent empirical content and the comparison baselines are externally defined.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard wave propagation, a borrowed random-phase compositing law, an assumption that T-frame averaging suppresses speckle, and an ad-hoc validation proxy (MPIs extracted by binning Gaussian splats). No new physical entities are introduced; the main free parameters are algorithmic choices (layer count, frame count, propagation distance, depth binning).

free parameters (4)
  • MPI layer count L = 4, 64, 512 (ablations); 4 layers used for the 250,000x speedup claim
    The number of depth planes is user-chosen; it controls the speed/quality tradeoff and directly determines the headline speedup magnitude.
  • Time-multiplex frame count T = 24
    Chosen for all experiments; affects speckle suppression and runtime, but no T sweep is reported.
  • Phase-only encoding propagation distance = 4 cm
    Fixed SGD target distance in the experimental setup; display-dependent choice.
  • Uniform depth partitioning (z_min, z_max) = scene-dependent
    MPIs are extracted by binding Gaussian splats to uniformly spaced depth planes within the scene's depth range; this binning choice affects the resulting MPI quality.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Angular spectrum method (Goodman 2005) correctly models propagation between parallel planes in the MPI stack.
    Invoked in Eq. 2 via the P operator; a standard optics result that the paper does not re-derive.
  • domain assumption The random-phase wave-optics alpha compositing rule in Eq. 2 is a valid model of semi-transparent layers in coherent CGH.
    Adopted from the authors' own RPWS paper via citation; it is the load-bearing physical model for all quality claims.
  • domain assumption T-frame intensity averaging of fully random-phase holograms approximates the perceived image and suppresses speckle in the eyebox.
    Used in Eq. 3; the paper notes contrast loss from random phase but gives no quantitative bound.
  • ad hoc to paper MPIs extracted from Gaussian splats via Eq. 4 are representative of MPIs produced by neural predictors.
    Most validation uses Gaussian-binned MPIs, while the motivation relies on fast neural MPI generation; only one qualitative demo uses a neural MPI predictor.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fast Wave-optics Rendering of Multiplane Images for 3D Holographic Displays." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3EH7UPDO

@misc{pith2026260719731,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fast Wave-optics Rendering of Multiplane Images for 3D Holographic Displays},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3EH7UPDO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.19731}
}
read the original abstract

Recent advances in neural rendering have unlocked unprecedented capabilities in 3D reconstruction and novel view synthesis, giving rise to applications such as virtual fly-throughs of a 3D scene reconstructed from a set of sparse, casually captured images. However, these renderings are viewed on a computer screen or conventional VR headsets as 2D images, greatly limiting the perceptual realism and immersiveness of such experiences. The rapid development in novel 3D scene representations calls for dedicated rendering algorithms that convert these readily-available 3D contents into formats that are compatible with emerging 3D display technologies, such as holographic displays. In this paper, we propose a wave-optics rendering pipeline that works with multiplane images (MPIs) for efficient and high-quality hologram synthesis. Our MPI-based computer-generated holography algorithm greatly outperforms state-of-the-art primitive-based CGH algorithms in terms of runtime, achieving speedups up to 250,000x while achieving comparable image quality, and significantly outperforms conventional layer-based CGH algorithms in terms of image quality. We validate our method extensively on a wide variety of 3D scene datasets both in simulation and through experimentally captured results, showing exceptional 3D focal stack and 4D light field reconstruction performance without sacrificing efficiency.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19731 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. We propose a wave-optics rendering pipeline for multiplane images (MPIs) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The MPI CGH pipeline. Our MPI-based CGH pipeline consists of 4 steps. We start with a set of (a) camera frustum-aligned multiplane images defined by Eq. 1, and (b) transform them into complex wavefronts aligned with the SLM plane by applying a random phase map to each RGBA image slice. The complex MPI wavefronts are (c) sequentially propagated and composited at each MPI depth plane using our novel wave compositing p… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Runtime and image quality analysis of different CGH algorithms. We compare runtime and light field reconstruction quality across CGH algorithms with varying numbers of depth planes for RGBD- and MPI-based methods. We report average metrics on holograms generated from selected scenes of the Mip-NeRF 360 [Barron et al. 2022] dataset. RPWS achieves the highest image fidelity but is computationally expensive, being more… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Defocus and occlusion behaviours of different CGH algorithms at depth transitions. We show zoom-in crops of 3D focal stacks and 4D light fields reconstructed using different CGH algorithms. RPWS, a state-of-the-art primitives-based CGH method, produces the most natural…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Experimentally captured light field parallax at different focused depths. We capture light field parallax at different depth planes by translating both the pupil horizontally at the Fourier plane and the camera along the optical axis. As expected, the parallax shift of…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: MPI-based CGH works with MPIs produced by off-the-shelf neural networks. We use MPIs generated by Stereo Magnification [Zhou et al. 2018], a representative neural-network–based MPI predictor, for holo￾gram synthesis. Our MPI-based CGH algorithm is agnostic to the MPI g…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Simulated 3D focal stacks and 4D light fields of holograms generated using different CGH algorithms. RPWS achieves state-the-of-art focal stack and light field reconstruction quality among primitive-based CGH methods. RGBD holograms, despite being efficient to render, …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Experimentally captured 3D focal stacks and 4D light fields of holograms generated using different CGH algorithms. We capture 3D focal stacks and horizontal parallax results of holograms generated using different CGH algorithms on our benchtop holographic display setup…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

183 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Conference Proceedings , pages=

    Nerfstudio: A modular framework for neural radiance field development , author=. ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Conference Proceedings , pages=

    2023

  2. [2]

    2023 , publisher=

    Physically based rendering: From theory to implementation , author=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  3. [3]

    ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers , pages=

    2d gaussian splatting for geometrically accurate radiance fields , author=. ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers , pages=

    2024

  4. [4]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Computer generated hologram from point cloud using graphics processor , author=. Applied optics , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  5. [5]

    Applied Optics , volume=

    Fast occlusion processing for a polygon-based computer-generated hologram using the slice-by-slice silhouette method , author=. Applied Optics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  6. [6]

    Optics Express , volume=

    Occlusion handling using angular spectrum convolution in fully analytical mesh based computer generated hologram , author=. Optics Express , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  7. [7]

    Photonics Research , volume=

    High-speed rendering pipeline for polygon-based holograms , author=. Photonics Research , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  8. [8]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Fast polygon-based method for calculating computer-generated holograms in three-dimensional display , author=. Applied optics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

Show all 183 references
  1. [9]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Rendering of specular curved objects in polygon-based computer holography , author=. Applied optics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  2. [10]

    Light: Science & Applications , volume=

    Review of computer-generated hologram algorithms for color dynamic holographic three-dimensional display , author=. Light: Science & Applications , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  3. [11]

    Applied Optics , volume=

    Polygon-based computer-generated holography: a review of fundamentals and recent progress , author=. Applied Optics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  4. [12]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Extremely high-definition full-parallax computer-generated hologram created by the polygon-based method , author=. Applied optics , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  5. [13]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Plenoxels: Radiance fields without neural networks , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  6. [14]

    Optics express , volume=

    Computer-generated holograms by multiple wavefront recording plane method with occlusion culling , author=. Optics express , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  7. [15]

    Optics Express , volume=

    GPU-accelerated calculation of computer-generated holograms for line-drawn objects , author=. Optics Express , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  8. [16]

    ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Conference Proceedings , pages=

    Time-multiplexed neural holography: a flexible framework for holographic near-eye displays with fast heavily-quantized spatial light modulators , author=. ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Conference Proceedings , pages=

    2022

  9. [17]

    Optics Express , volume=

    Modern hardware accelerated point based holography , author=. Optics Express , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  10. [18]

    Optics express , volume=

    Silhouette method for hidden surface removal in computer holography and its acceleration using the switch-back technique , author=. Optics express , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  11. [19]

    Optics Express , volume=

    Accelerated synthesis algorithm of polygon computer-generated holograms , author=. Optics Express , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  12. [20]

    Optics Letters , volume=

    Point-polygon hybrid method for generating holograms , author=. Optics Letters , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  13. [21]

    JOSA A , volume=

    Fast calculation method for optical diffraction on tilted planes by use of the angular spectrum of plane waves , author=. JOSA A , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  14. [22]

    Journal of Information Display , volume=

    Recent progress in computer-generated holography for three-dimensional scenes , author=. Journal of Information Display , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  15. [23]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Computer-generated holograms for three-dimensional surface objects with shade and texture , author=. Applied optics , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  16. [24]

    Applied Optics , volume=

    Full-color digitized holography for large-scale holographic 3D imaging of physical and nonphysical objects , author=. Applied Optics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  17. [25]

    Optics express , volume=

    Occlusion culling for computer generated hologram based on ray-wavefront conversion , author=. Optics express , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  18. [26]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Chen, Rick H-Y and Wilkinson, Timothy D , title=. Applied optics , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  19. [27]

    Practical Holography XI and Holographic Materials III , volume=

    Occlusion processing and smooth surface shading for fully computed synthetic holography , author=. Practical Holography XI and Holographic Materials III , volume=. 1997 , organization=

    1997

  20. [28]

    The Visual Computer , volume=

    Detail-driven digital hologram generation , author=. The Visual Computer , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  21. [29]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Hybrid approach for fast occlusion processing in computer-generated hologram calculation , author=. Applied optics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  22. [30]

    2020 , publisher=

    Introduction to Computer Holography: Creating Computer-Generated Holograms as the Ultimate 3D Image , author=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  23. [31]

    Optics Express , volume=

    Fast shadow casting algorithm in analytical polygon-based computer-generated holography , author=. Optics Express , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  24. [32]

    Optics Express , volume=

    Calculation of reflectance distribution using angular spectrum convolution in mesh-based computer generated hologram , author=. Optics Express , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  25. [33]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Mathematical modeling of triangle-mesh-modeled three-dimensional surface objects for digital holography , author=. Applied optics , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  26. [34]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Computer generated holograms from three dimensional meshes using an analytic light transport model , author=. Applied optics , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  27. [35]

    2005 , publisher=

    Introduction to Fourier optics , author=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  28. [36]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=

    Neural point catacaustics for novel-view synthesis of reflections , author=. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  29. [37]

    and Mildenhall, Ben and Verbin, Dor and Srinivasan, Pratul P

    Barron, Jonathan T. and Mildenhall, Ben and Verbin, Dor and Srinivasan, Pratul P. and Hedman, Peter , booktitle=

  30. [38]

    NeurIPS , year =

    3D Gaussian Splatting as Markov Chain Monte Carlo , author =. NeurIPS , year =

  31. [39]

    gsplat: An Open-Source Library for

    Vickie Ye and Ruilong Li and Justin Kerr and Matias Turkulainen and Brent Yi and Zhuoyang Pan and Otto Seiskari and Jianbo Ye and Jeffrey Hu and Matthew Tancik and Angjoo Kanazawa , year=. gsplat: An Open-Source Library for. arXiv , primaryClass=:2409.06765 , journal=

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=

    Neural holography with camera-in-the-loop training , author=. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  33. [41]

    JOSA A , volume=

    Hologram synthesis for photorealistic reconstruction , author=. JOSA A , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  34. [42]

    Nature , volume=

    Towards real-time photorealistic 3D holography with deep neural networks , author=. Nature , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  35. [43]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (Tog) , volume=

    Holographic near-eye displays for virtual and augmented reality , author=. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Tog) , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  36. [44]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Accurate phase-added stereogram to improve the coherent stereogram , author=. Applied optics , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  37. [45]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Computer-generated hologram with occlusion effect using layer-based processing , author=. Applied optics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  38. [46]

    Practical Holography XIX: Materials and Applications , volume=

    Exact hidden-surface removal in digitally synthetic full-parallax holograms , author=. Practical Holography XIX: Materials and Applications , volume=. 2005 , organization=

    2005

  39. [47]

    JOSA A , volume=

    Diffusers in digital holography , author=. JOSA A , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

    1991

  40. [48]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=

    Neural 3d holography: Learning accurate wave propagation models for 3d holographic virtual and augmented reality displays , author=. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  41. [49]

    Light: Science & Applications , volume=

    End-to-end learning of 3d phase-only holograms for holographic display , author=. Light: Science & Applications , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  42. [50]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=

    Holographic near-eye displays based on overlap-add stereograms , author=. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  43. [51]

    2022 , isbn =

    Kim, Jonghyun and Gopakumar, Manu and Choi, Suyeon and Peng, Yifan and Lopes, Ward and Wetzstein, Gordon , title =. 2022 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/3528233.3530739 , booktitle =

    2022

  44. [52]

    Nature , pages=

    Full-colour 3D holographic augmented-reality displays with metasurface waveguides , author=. Nature , pages=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  45. [53]

    Nature Communications , volume=

    Waveguide holography for 3D augmented reality glasses , author=. Nature Communications , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  46. [54]

    Optica , volume=

    Toward the next-generation VR/AR optics: a review of holographic near-eye displays from a human-centric perspective , author=. Optica , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  47. [55]

    Computer Graphics Forum , volume=

    Advances in neural rendering , author=. Computer Graphics Forum , volume=. 2022 , organization=

    2022

  48. [56]

    Computer Graphics Forum , volume=

    State of the art on neural rendering , author=. Computer Graphics Forum , volume=. 2020 , organization=

    2020

  49. [57]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03890 , year=

    A survey on 3d gaussian splatting , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03890 , year=

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    Journal of display technology , volume=

    State of the art in holographic displays: a survey , author=. Journal of display technology , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  51. [59]

    Optics Express , volume=

    Roadmap on digital holography , author=. Optics Express , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  52. [60]

    Xu, Qiangeng and Xu, Zexiang and Philip, Julien and Bi, Sai and Shu, Zhixin and Sunkavalli, Kalyan and Neumann, Ulrich , booktitle=

  53. [61]

    and Sevastopolsky, A

    Aliev, K. and Sevastopolsky, A. and Kolos, M. and Ulyanov, D. and Lempitsky, V. , title =. 2019 , eprint=

    2019

  54. [62]

    Kopanas, Georgios and Philip, Julien and Leimk \"u hler, Thomas and Drettakis, George. CGF. 2021

    2021

  55. [63]

    Sara Fridovich-Keil and Alex Yu and Matthew Tancik and Qinhong Chen and Benjamin Recht and Angjoo Kanazawa , year=

  56. [64]

    Alex Yu and Ruilong Li and Matthew Tancik and Hao Li and Ren Ng and Angjoo Kanazawa , year=

  57. [65]

    and Zhang, Z

    Hu, D. and Zhang, Z. and Hou, T. and Liu, T. and Fu, H. and Gong, M. , title =. ICCV , year =

  58. [66]

    and Pathak, Deepak , booktitle=

    Hu, Ronghang and Ravi, Nikhila and Berg, Alexander C. and Pathak, Deepak , booktitle=

  59. [67]

    SIGGRAPH Asia , year =

    Guo, Yuan-Chen and Cao, Yan-Pei and Wang, Chen and He, Yu and Shan, Ying and Zhang, Song-Hai , title =. SIGGRAPH Asia , year =

  60. [68]

    ACM TOG , volume =

    Lombardi, Stephen and Saragih, Jason and Simon, Tomas and Sheikh, Yaser , title =. ACM TOG , volume =

  61. [69]

    Chong Bao and Bangbang Yang and Zeng Junyi and Bao Hujun and Zhang Yinda and Cui Zhaopeng and Zhang Guofeng , booktitle=

  62. [70]

    and Ushiku, Y

    Kato, H. and Ushiku, Y. and Harada, T. , title =. CVPR , year =

  63. [71]

    and Tancik, Matthew and Barron, Jonathan T

    Mildenhall, Ben and Srinivasan, Pratul P. and Tancik, Matthew and Barron, Jonathan T. and Ramamoorthi, Ravi and Ng, Ren , booktitle=

  64. [72]

    ACM TOG , volume =

    M\"uller, Thomas and Evans, Alex and Schied, Christoph and Keller, Alexander , title =. ACM TOG , volume =

  65. [73]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Implicit neural representations with periodic activation functions , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  66. [74]

    NeurIPS , year=

    Sitzmann, Vincent and Zollh. NeurIPS , year=

  67. [75]

    ACM TOG , volume =

    Kerbl, Bernhard and Kopanas, Georgios and Leimk. ACM TOG , volume =

  68. [76]

    ICCV , year=

    Delicate Textured Mesh Recovery from NeRF via Adaptive Surface Refinement , author=. ICCV , year=

  69. [77]

    NeurIPS , year=

    NeuS: Learning Neural Implicit Surfaces by Volume Rendering for Multi-view Reconstruction , author=. NeurIPS , year=

  70. [78]

    ACM TOG , month =

    Hanocka, Rana and Metzer, Gal and Giryes, Raja and Cohen-Or, Daniel , title =. ACM TOG , month =. 2020 , volume =

    2020

  71. [79]

    and Cline, Harvey E

    Lorensen, William E. and Cline, Harvey E. , title =. 1987 , booktitle =

    1987

  72. [80]

    SGP , year=

    Poisson Surface Reconstruction , author=. SGP , year=

  73. [81]

    NeurIPS , year=

    Volume Rendering of Neural Implicit Surfaces , author=. NeurIPS , year=

  74. [82]

    ACM SIGGRAPH , year =

    Dai, Pinxuan and Xu, Jiamin and Xie, Wenxiang and Liu, Xinguo and Wang, Huamin and Xu, Weiwei , title =. ACM SIGGRAPH , year =

  75. [83]

    CVPR , year=

    SuGaR: Surface-Aligned Gaussian Splatting for Efficient 3D Mesh Reconstruction and High-Quality Mesh Rendering , author=. CVPR , year=

  76. [84]

    2024 , booktitle=

    Texture-GS: Disentangling the Geometry and Texture for 3D Gaussian Splatting Editing , author=. 2024 , booktitle=

    2024

  77. [85]

    CVPR , year=

    GaussianShader: 3D Gaussian Splatting with Shading Functions for Reflective Surfaces , author=. CVPR , year=

  78. [86]

    Journal of Computer Graphics Techniques , volume=

    Weighted Blended Order-Independent transparency , author=. Journal of Computer Graphics Techniques , volume=

  79. [87]

    Nature photonics , volume=

    Breaking crosstalk limits to dynamic holography using orthogonality of high-dimensional random vectors , author=. Nature photonics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  80. [88]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=

    Wirtinger holography for near-eye displays , author=. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  81. [89]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=

    Holographic parallax improves 3D perceptual realism , author=. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  82. [90]

    2023 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP) , pages=

    Stochastic light field holography , author=. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP) , pages=. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  83. [91]

    Chao, Brian and Gopakumar, Manu and Choi, Suyeon and Kim, Jonghyun and Shi, Liang and Wetzstein, Gordon , booktitle=. Large

  84. [92]

    Nature Communications , volume=

    Diffraction-engineered holography: Beyond the depth representation limit of holographic displays , author=. Nature Communications , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  85. [93]

    Journal of Electronic Imaging , volume=

    Interactive computation of holograms using a look-up table , author=. Journal of Electronic Imaging , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

    1993

  86. [94]

    2008 , publisher=

    Holographic imaging , author=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  87. [95]

    Practical Holography V , volume=

    Ultragram: a generalized holographic stereogram , author=. Practical Holography V , volume=. 1991 , organization=

    1991

  88. [96]

    Processing and Display of Three-Dimensional Data , volume=

    Survey of holographic stereograms , author=. Processing and Display of Three-Dimensional Data , volume=. 1983 , organization=

    1983

  89. [97]

    Applied Optics , volume=

    Effective generation of digital holograms of three-dimensional objects using a novel look-up table method , author=. Applied Optics , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  90. [98]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Computer-generated double-phase holograms , author=. Applied optics , volume=. 1978 , publisher=

    1978

  91. [99]

    Optik , volume=

    A practical algorithm for the determination of plane from image and diffraction pictures , author=. Optik , volume=

  92. [100]

    Optics Express , volume=

    Acceleration of polygon-based computer-generated holograms using look-up tables and reduction of the table size via principal component analysis , author=. Optics Express , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  93. [101]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Three-dimensional deeply generated holography , author=. Applied optics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  94. [102]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Fast phase-added stereogram algorithm for generation of photorealistic 3D content , author=. Applied optics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  95. [103]

    Optics letters , volume=

    Simple and fast calculation algorithm for computer-generated hologram with wavefront recording plane , author=. Optics letters , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  96. [104]

    Optics express , volume=

    Band-limited angular spectrum method for numerical simulation of free-space propagation in far and near fields , author=. Optics express , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  97. [105]

    Optics Express , volume=

    Shifted angular spectrum method for off-axis numerical propagation , author=. Optics Express , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  98. [106]

    ACM SIGGRAPH computer graphics , volume=

    Ray tracing volume densities , author=. ACM SIGGRAPH computer graphics , volume=. 1984 , publisher=

    1984

  99. [107]

    Electronics Letters , volume=

    Affine theorem for two-dimensional Fourier transform , author=. Electronics Letters , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

    1993

  100. [108]

    Proceedings Visualization, 2001

    EWA volume splatting , author=. Proceedings Visualization, 2001. VIS'01. , pages=. 2001 , organization=

    2001

  101. [109]

    1996 , publisher=

    Computer graphics: principles and practice , author=. 1996 , publisher=

    1996

  102. [110]

    1996 , publisher=

    Jim Blinn's corner: a trip down the graphics pipeline , author=. 1996 , publisher=

    1996

  103. [111]

    2011 , publisher=

    Analysis and synthesis of three-dimensional illumination using partial coherence , author=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  104. [112]

    Optics express , volume=

    Accelerated synthesis of wide-viewing angle polygon computer-generated holograms using the interocular affine similarity of three-dimensional scenes , author=. Optics express , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  105. [113]

    2023 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) , pages=

    Realistic defocus blur for multiplane computer-generated holography , author=. 2023 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) , pages=. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  106. [114]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=

    Near-eye light field holographic rendering with spherical waves for wide field of view interactive 3D computer graphics , author=. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  107. [115]

    Optics letters , volume=

    Full-range, complex spatial light modulator for real-time holography , author=. Optics letters , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  108. [116]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=

    Pupil-aware Holography , author=. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  109. [117]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=

    Multisource holography , author=. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  110. [118]

    2020 , issue_date =

    Kuo, Grace and Waller, Laura and Ng, Ren and Maimone, Andrew , title =. 2020 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3386569.3392414 , journal =

    2020

  111. [119]

    Optics Express , volume=

    Removal of line artifacts on mesh boundary in computer generated hologram by mesh phase matching , author=. Optics Express , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  112. [120]

    Optics express , volume=

    Fast generation of full analytical polygon-based computer-generated holograms , author=. Optics express , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  113. [121]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , volume=

    Lambertian reflectance and linear subspaces , author=. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  114. [122]

    Optics letters , volume=

    Time-multiplexed light field synthesis via factored Wigner distribution function , author=. Optics letters , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  115. [123]

    Goodman , title =

    Joseph W. Goodman , title =. 2015 , edition =

    2015

  116. [124]

    ACM Trans

    Kim, Dongyeon and Nam, Seung-Woo and Lee, Byounghyo and Seo, Jong-Mo and Lee, Byoungho , title =. ACM Trans. Graph. , month = jul, articleno =. 2022 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3528223.3530147 , abstract =

    2022

  117. [125]

    Laser & Photonics Reviews , volume =

    Shi, Liang and Ryu, DongHun and Matusik, Wojciech , title =. Laser & Photonics Reviews , volume =

  118. [126]

    Scientific Reports , year =

    Byounghyo Lee and Dongyeon Kim and Seungjae Lee and Chun Chen and Byoungho Lee , title =. Scientific Reports , year =. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-06405-2 , url =

    doi

  119. [127]

    Optics express , volume=

    Random phase-free computer-generated hologram , author=. Optics express , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  120. [128]

    Optics Letters , volume=

    Optimization of computer-generated holograms featuring phase randomness control , author=. Optics Letters , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  121. [129]

    2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) , pages=

    DCGH: dynamic computer generated holography for speckle-free, high fidelity 3D displays , author=. 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) , pages=. 2021 , organization=

    2021

  122. [130]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , volume=

    Real-time computation of 3D wireframes in computer-generated holography , author=. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  123. [131]

    Optics express , volume=

    Improved layer-based method for rapid hologram generation and real-time interactive holographic display applications , author=. Optics express , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  124. [132]

    Optics express , volume=

    Three-dimensional computer-generated hologram with Fourier domain segmentation , author=. Optics express , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  125. [133]

    Optics express , volume=

    Non-hogel-based computer generated hologram from light field using complex field recovery technique from Wigner distribution function , author=. Optics express , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  126. [134]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Speckle-noise reduction on kinoform reconstruction using a phase-only spatial light modulator , author=. Applied optics , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  127. [135]

    Applied optics , volume=

    Binary Fraunhofer holograms, generated by computer , author=. Applied optics , volume=. 1967 , publisher=

    1967

  128. [136]

    Optics Letters , volume=

    Fresnel diffraction and the fractional-order Fourier transform , author=. Optics Letters , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

    1994

  129. [137]

    Optics express , volume=

    Novel method for converting digital Fresnel hologram to phase-only hologram based on bidirectional error diffusion , author=. Optics express , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  130. [138]

    Optical Engineering , volume=

    Iterative method applied to image reconstruction and to computer-generated holograms , author=. Optical Engineering , volume=. 1980 , publisher=

    1980

  131. [139]

    Optical Engineering , volume=

    Phase profiles for holographic stereograms , author=. Optical Engineering , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  132. [140]

    Optica , volume=

    3D computer-generated holography by non-convex optimization , author=. Optica , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  133. [141]

    Digital Holography and Three-Dimensional Display: Principles and Applications , pages=

    Computer-generated holograms , author=. Digital Holography and Three-Dimensional Display: Principles and Applications , pages=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  134. [142]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=

    Gaussian Wave Splatting for Computer Generated Holography , author=. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  135. [143]

    Optics express , volume=

    Speckleless holographic display by complex modulation based on double-phase method , author=. Optics express , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  136. [144]

    Sensors , VOLUME =

    Li, David and Jabbireddy, Susmija and Zhang, Yang and Metzler, Christopher and Varshney, Amitabh , TITLE =. Sensors , VOLUME =. 2024 , NUMBER =

    2024

  137. [145]

    , author=

    Fast Poisson disk sampling in arbitrary dimensions. , author=. SIGGRAPH sketches , volume=

  138. [146]

    ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Papers , pages =

    Dunbar, Daniel and Humphreys, Greg , title =. ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Papers , pages =. 2006 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/1179352.1141915 , abstract =

    2006

  139. [147]

    Optics Communications , volume=

    Influence of limited random-phase of objects on the image quality of 3D holographic display , author=. Optics Communications , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  140. [148]

    Optics Communications , volume=

    Image quality enhancement via gradient-limited random phase addition in holographic display , author=. Optics Communications , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  141. [149]

    Applied Optics , volume=

    Frequency-based optimized random phase for computer-generated holographic display , author=. Applied Optics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  142. [150]

    Optics letters , volume=

    Optimized random phase only holograms , author=. Optics letters , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  143. [151]

    Science advances , volume=

    Speckle-free holography with partially coherent light sources and camera-in-the-loop calibration , author=. Science advances , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  144. [152]

    Scientific reports , volume=

    Light source optimization for partially coherent holographic displays with consideration of speckle contrast, resolution, and depth of field , author=. Scientific reports , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  145. [153]

    2007 , publisher=

    Speckle phenomena in optics: theory and applications , author=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  146. [154]

    Multi-depth hologram generation using stochastic gradient descent algorithm with complex loss function , volume =

    Chun Chen and Byounghyo Lee and Nan-Nan Li and Minseok Chae and Di Wang and Qiong-Hua Wang and Byoungho Lee , journal =. Multi-depth hologram generation using stochastic gradient descent algorithm with complex loss function , volume =. 2021 , url =. doi:10.1364/OE.425077 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  147. [155]

    Proceedings of the 3D Image Conference , volume =

    Rendering of translucent models with alpha blending in polygon-based computer-generated holograms , author =. Proceedings of the 3D Image Conference , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  148. [156]

    International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

    Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

  149. [157]

    2005 , school=

    Light field photography with a hand-held plenoptic camera , author=. 2005 , school=

    2005

  150. [158]

    ACM Trans

    Lee, Seungjae and Jang, Changwon and Moon, Seokil and Cho, Jaebum and Lee, Byoungho , title =. ACM Trans. Graph. , month = jul, articleno =. 2016 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/2897824.2925971 , abstract =

    2016

  151. [159]

    ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Papers , articleno =

    Wetzstein, Gordon and Lanman, Douglas and Heidrich, Wolfgang and Raskar, Ramesh , title =. ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Papers , articleno =. 2011 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/1964921.1964990 , abstract =

    2011

  152. [160]

    ACM Trans

    Wetzstein, Gordon and Lanman, Douglas and Hirsch, Matthew and Raskar, Ramesh , title =. ACM Trans. Graph. , month = jul, articleno =. 2012 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/2185520.2185576 , abstract =

    2012

  153. [161]

    Compressive Light Field Displays , year=

    Wetzstein, Gordon and Lanman, Douglas and Hirsch, Matthew and Heidrich, Wolfgang and Raskar, Ramesh , journal=. Compressive Light Field Displays , year=

  154. [162]

    ACM Trans

    Heide, Felix and Wetzstein, Gordon and Raskar, Ramesh and Heidrich, Wolfgang , title =. ACM Trans. Graph. , month = jul, articleno =. 2013 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/2461912.2461925 , abstract =

    2013

  155. [163]

    ACM Trans

    Maimone, Andrew and Wetzstein, Gordon and Hirsch, Matthew and Lanman, Douglas and Raskar, Ramesh and Fuchs, Henry , title =. ACM Trans. Graph. , month = oct, articleno =. 2013 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/2503144 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  156. [164]

    ACM Trans

    Huang, Fu-Chung and Chen, Kevin and Wetzstein, Gordon , title =. ACM Trans. Graph. , month = jul, articleno =. 2015 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/2766922 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  157. [165]

    ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2010 Papers , articleno =

    Lanman, Douglas and Hirsch, Matthew and Kim, Yunhee and Raskar, Ramesh , title =. ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2010 Papers , articleno =. 2010 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/1866158.1866164 , abstract =

    2010

  158. [166]

    ACM Trans

    Zhou, Tinghui and Tucker, Richard and Flynn, John and Fyffe, Graham and Snavely, Noah , title =. ACM Trans. Graph. , month = jul, articleno =. 2018 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3197517.3201323 , abstract =

    2018

  159. [167]

    ECCV , pages=

    Generative multiplane images: Making a 2d gan 3d-aware , author=. ECCV , pages=

  160. [168]

    SIGGRAPH , pages=

    Single-view view synthesis in the wild with learned adaptive multiplane images , author=. SIGGRAPH , pages=

  161. [169]

    CVPR , pages=

    Single-view view synthesis with multiplane images , author=. CVPR , pages=

  162. [170]

    CVPR , pages=

    Pushing the boundaries of view extrapolation with multiplane images , author=. CVPR , pages=

  163. [171]

    CVPR , pages=

    Tiled multiplane images for practical 3D photography , author=. CVPR , pages=

  164. [172]

    SIGGRAPH , pages=

    Sinmpi: Novel view synthesis from a single image with expanded multiplane images , author=. SIGGRAPH , pages=

  165. [173]

    CVPR , pages=

    Adaptive multiplane image generation from a single internet picture , author=. CVPR , pages=

  166. [174]

    CVPR , pages=

    Deepview: View synthesis with learned gradient descent , author=. CVPR , pages=

  167. [175]

    Nature Photonics , year =

    Suyeon Choi and Changwon Jang and Douglas Lanman and Gordon Wetzstein , title =. Nature Photonics , year =. doi:10.1038/s41566-025-01718-w , url =

    doi

  168. [176]

    Unfiltered holography: optimizing high diffraction orders without optical filtering for compact holographic displays , volume =

    Manu Gopakumar and Jonghyun Kim and Suyeon Choi and Yifan Peng and Gordon Wetzstein , journal =. Unfiltered holography: optimizing high diffraction orders without optical filtering for compact holographic displays , volume =

  169. [177]

    2025 , eprint=

    Complex-Valued Holographic Radiance Fields , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  170. [178]

    NeurIPS , year=

    Depth Anything V2 , author=. NeurIPS , year=

  171. [179]

    2025 , issue_date =

    Chu, Victor and Pueyo-Ciutad, Oscar and Tseng, Ethan and Schiffers, Florian and Kuo, Grace and Matsuda, Nathan and Redo-Sanchez, Albert and Lanman Douglas and Cossairt, Oliver and Heide, Felix , title =. 2025 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3763361 , journal =

    2025 doi

  172. [180]

    C. K. Hsueh and A. A. Sawchuk , journal =. Computer-generated double-phase holograms , volume =. 1978 , url =. doi:10.1364/AO.17.003874 , abstract =

    1978 doi

  173. [181]

    Single-Sideband Holography , volume =

    Olof Bryngdahl and Adolf Lohmann , journal =. Single-Sideband Holography , volume =. 1968 , url =. doi:10.1364/JOSA.58.000620 , abstract =

    1968 doi

  174. [182]

    SIGGRAPH Comput

    Porter, Thomas and Duff, Tom , title =. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. , month = jan, pages =. 1984 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/964965.808606 , abstract =

    1984

  175. [183]

    2025 , eprint=

    Random-phase Wave Splatting of Translucent Primitives for Computer-generated Holography , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.