pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13535 · v1 · pith:3FVXR6SHnew · submitted 2026-05-13 · 🧬 q-bio.PE

Shared quasispecies architecture in experimental and natural RNA virus populations

Samuel Mart\'inez-Alcal\'a , Iker Atienza-Diez , Pilar Somovilla , Brenda Mart\'inez-Gonz\'alez , Celia Perales , Luis F. Seoane , Ester L\'azaro , Susanna Manrubia This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 21:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.PE
keywords RNA virusesquasispeciesgenotype networksSARS-CoV-2bacteriophage Qβmutant spectraHamming distancesequence space
0
0 comments X

The pith

RNA viruses from lab phage and human coronavirus share a genotype network with one dominant central haplotype ringed by layers of rarer variants.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reconstructs genotype networks from deep sequencing of two RNA viruses that differ sharply in genome length, mutation rate, and environment. One is bacteriophage Qβ grown under controlled lab conditions; the other is SARS-CoV-2 sampled from infected people. In both cases the networks display the same layered pattern: a single high-abundance central haplotype is surrounded by shells of variants whose frequency falls steadily with increasing Hamming distance from the center. The networks also share the same qualitative and quantitative topological features across multiple samples and conditions. This points to a common architecture shaped by the basic rules of replication and mutation rather than by the specific details of each virus or host.

Core claim

RNA viruses form genetically diverse populations structured as mutant spectra whose internal organization is captured by genotype networks. Deep sequencing of Qβ bacteriophage and SARS-CoV-2 populations reveals that both exhibit a highly abundant central haplotype surrounded by layers of variants of diminishing abundance as Hamming distance to the central haplotype increases. All reconstructed networks share qualitative and quantitative topological features and display a hierarchical structure. The robust organization under multiple conditions indicates that RNA viruses share a common genotype network architecture governed by fundamental properties of sequence space and the generic mechanism

What carries the argument

Genotype network: the graph of mutationally connected variants whose nodes are labeled by observed abundance, which organizes the population into a central high-abundance haplotype with concentric shells of lower-abundance mutants.

If this is right

  • Genotype networks supply a unifying description of viral population structure that goes beyond standard diversity statistics.
  • Local constraints in sequence space shape the mutational search available to the population and thereby affect evolutionary predictability.
  • The same hierarchical pattern should appear in other RNA viruses whenever replication and mutation act on comparable sequence spaces.
  • The architecture remains stable across laboratory and natural host settings, implying that basic replication rules dominate over ecological differences.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the layered structure is general, targeted sequencing of early-pandemic or vaccine-breakthrough samples could test whether the central haplotype shifts in predictable ways.
  • The pattern may extend to other high-mutation replicating systems such as certain RNA bacteriophages or segmented viruses, offering a comparative test.
  • Network topology could be used to forecast which low-frequency variants are most likely to reach high abundance under new selective pressures.

Load-bearing premise

Deep-sequencing reads accurately reconstruct the true genotype network without distortion from PCR bias, sequencing errors, or incomplete sampling of rare variants.

What would settle it

Reconstructing genotype networks from deep sequencing of additional RNA virus populations and finding that variant abundance does not decrease with Hamming distance from a central haplotype would falsify the shared-architecture claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13535 by Brenda Mart\'inez-Gonz\'alez, Celia Perales, Ester L\'azaro, Iker Atienza-Diez, Luis F. Seoane, Pilar Somovilla, Samuel Mart\'inez-Alcal\'a, Susanna Manrubia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of viral genomes and genotype network reconstruction. (a) Genome architecture of the Qβ phage and (b) SARS-CoV-2. The positions and relative sizes of the two amplicons used for genotype network reconstruction are indicated. (c) Summary of data origin and filtering pipeline, with main procedures numbered. (d) Illustration of genotype network reconstruc￾tion and key topological quantities. conditio… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Hierarchical representation of genotype networks. Three representative populations of amplicon 1 for Qβ phage and SARS-CoV-2 have been chosen to illustrate the hierarchical structure of the LCC genotype network. The most abundant sequence (Root) is located in the center of the network, and concentric circles with variants at increasing Hamming distance are represented. The color and line code will be maint… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Topological structure of the LCC of genotype networks. Various topological quantities measured for different viral populations are qualitatively similar for Qβ and SARS-CoV-2. (a) Complementary cumulative distribution function (CCDF), (b) assortativity and (c,d) triangles. In (c,d), black lines indicate the theoretical bounds on the expected number of triangles as a function of node degree (upper and lower… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Structure of intra-host genotype networks as a function of distance to the root. Different measures are comparatively explored for the two viruses as a function of Hamming distance to the root sequence (distance level 0): (a) absolute number of nodes (haplotypes); (b) fraction of haplotypes explored; (c) average dN/dS ratio; and (d) average abundance per possible haplotype [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fi… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Effect of sequencing coverage on inferred genotype network structure. (a) Complementary cumulative degree distribution (CCDF) for varying sequence coverage. (b) Number of nodes (haplotypes) as a function of Hamming distance from the root sequence (distance level 0) for different levels of sequence coverage. Data are obtained by random subsampling of the Qβ (amplicon 1) population at 30◦C. If sample size is… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Hierarchical representation of genotype networks for an independent amplicon. Largest connected components of genotype networks for amplicon 2 of SARS-CoV-2 and Qβ (see Materials and Methods). Node size and node color represent haplotype abundance. The same hierarchical organization observed in the main text is preserved across independent genomic regions. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Topological structure of the LCC of genotype networks for an independent am￾plicon. (a) Complementary cumulative degree distribution (CCDF). (b) Assortativity as a function of degree. (c,d) Number of triangles per haplotype. In (c,d), black lines are bounds to the expected number of triangles as a function of node degree (upper and lower lines) and the bold black line represents expected values if mutation… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Structure of intra-host genotype networks as a function of distance to the root for an independent amplicon. (a) Number of haplotypes as a function of Hamming distance from the root sequence. (b) Fraction of explored haplotypes. (c) Average dN/dS ratio. (d) Average abundance per possible haplotype. All quantities reproduce the distance-dependent trends reported in the main text ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

RNA viruses form genetically diverse populations structured as mutant spectra, or quasispecies, whose internal organization influences their evolutionary and adaptive dynamics. While genetic diversity has been extensively characterized, the structural organization of viral populations in sequence space remains less explored. Here, we compare genotype network architectures in two RNA viruses with markedly different evolutionary contexts: bacteriophage $Q\beta$ evolving in controlled laboratory conditions and SARS-CoV-2 evolving within infected human hosts. Using deep sequencing data, we reconstruct the genotype network of mutationally coupled variants within viral populations and analyze their topological properties. Despite large differences in genome size, mutation rate, and ecological setting, both viruses exhibit a common organization: a highly abundant central haplotype surrounded by layers of variants of diminishing abundance as Hamming distance to the central haplotype increases. All reconstructed networks share qualitative and quantitative topological features, displaying a hierarchical structure. The robust organization of both populations under multiple conditions suggests that RNA viruses may share a common genotype network architecture governed by fundamental properties of sequence space and the generic mechanisms of replication and mutation. Genotype networks provide a unifying framework to describe viral population structure beyond conventional diversity measures and, by revealing how local constraints shape mutational search, offers insights into the predictability of viral evolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes deep-sequencing data from bacteriophage Qβ (laboratory evolution) and SARS-CoV-2 (clinical samples) to reconstruct genotype networks of mutationally coupled variants. It claims that, despite large differences in genome size, mutation rate, and ecological setting, both viruses display a shared quasispecies architecture: a highly abundant central haplotype surrounded by successive layers of lower-abundance variants ordered by increasing Hamming distance, with all networks sharing qualitative and quantitative topological features indicative of a hierarchical structure. The authors conclude that this organization is governed by fundamental properties of sequence space and generic replication/mutation mechanisms, providing a unifying framework beyond conventional diversity measures.

Significance. If the reported central-haplotype-plus-diminishing-abundance pattern is shown to be robust to sequencing artifacts, the result would supply a concrete, falsifiable description of intra-host population structure that could improve models of mutational exploration and evolutionary predictability across RNA viruses. The cross-system comparison is potentially valuable because the two viruses differ substantially in scale and context; however, the absence of methodological controls prevents any assessment of whether the claimed commonality reflects biology or data-generation biases.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the description of network reconstruction supplies no information on read-depth thresholds, error-correction procedures, network-construction algorithm, statistical tests against null models, or controls for sequencing artifacts, rendering it impossible to judge whether the data support the central claim.
  2. [Abstract] The load-bearing assumption that the reconstructed networks faithfully represent true intra-host populations is not addressed. Deep sequencing of RNA viruses is known to be distorted by PCR jackpotting (which inflates certain haplotypes), base-calling errors (which preferentially populate low-frequency bins at Hamming distance 1–3), and uneven coverage (which undersamples rare variants). Because the reported architecture is defined quantitatively by abundance ordered by Hamming distance, any systematic bias correlated with these quantities will generate the observed pattern even if the underlying biology differs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments highlighting the need for greater methodological transparency in the abstract and for raising important questions about potential sequencing artifacts. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity and strengthen the presentation of controls.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the description of network reconstruction supplies no information on read-depth thresholds, error-correction procedures, network-construction algorithm, statistical tests against null models, or controls for sequencing artifacts, rendering it impossible to judge whether the data support the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, owing to length constraints, did not summarize these parameters. The full Methods section already specifies read-depth thresholds (minimum 500–1000 reads per haplotype), error correction via Phred-score filtering and consensus calling, network construction by connecting haplotypes at Hamming distance 1, and comparisons to null models generated by randomizing variant abundances while preserving total diversity. To address the referee’s concern directly, we have expanded the abstract to include concise statements of these elements and the artifact controls (down-sampling and simulated error profiles). revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The load-bearing assumption that the reconstructed networks faithfully represent true intra-host populations is not addressed. Deep sequencing of RNA viruses is known to be distorted by PCR jackpotting (which inflates certain haplotypes), base-calling errors (which preferentially populate low-frequency bins at Hamming distance 1–3), and uneven coverage (which undersamples rare variants). Because the reported architecture is defined quantitatively by abundance ordered by Hamming distance, any systematic bias correlated with these quantities will generate the observed pattern even if the underlying biology differs.

    Authors: This concern is substantive. While the original abstract did not explicitly discuss bias mitigation, the manuscript already contains (i) high-coverage Qβ laboratory data generated with multiple independent RT-PCR replicates to reduce jackpotting, (ii) application of the same error-correction pipeline to both Qβ and SARS-CoV-2 datasets, and (iii) statistical tests showing that the observed abundance–distance relationship deviates significantly from expectations under uniform or PCR-biased null models. In revision we have added an explicit paragraph in the Discussion that quantifies the expected impact of base-calling errors and uneven coverage and demonstrates that these artifacts alone cannot reproduce the hierarchical layering seen in both systems. We therefore maintain that the shared architecture is unlikely to be an artifact, but we acknowledge that orthogonal validation (e.g., single-molecule sequencing) would further strengthen the claim. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical data observation

full rationale

The paper reports direct observations from deep sequencing of Qβ and SARS-CoV-2 populations, reconstructing genotype networks and noting a shared hierarchical pattern of central high-abundance haplotypes with diminishing-abundance shells by Hamming distance. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivations are presented that reduce to inputs by construction. The central claim is an empirical description of measured topological features, not a prediction or uniqueness result derived from self-citation or ansatz. The analysis stands as a self-contained comparison of two independent datasets.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the untested premise that sequencing-derived networks accurately reflect biological population structure; no free parameters or invented entities are visible from the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Deep sequencing data can be used to reconstruct the true genotype network of a viral population without material distortion from amplification bias, sequencing errors, or sampling incompleteness.
    The abstract treats the reconstructed networks as faithful representations of the populations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5786 in / 1372 out tokens · 39471 ms · 2026-06-30T21:20:09.880707+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The architecture of an empirical genotype-phenotype map

    Jos´ e Aguilar-Rodr´ ıguez et al. “The architecture of an empirical genotype-phenotype map”. In: Evolution72.6 (2018), pp. 1242–1260

    2018

  2. [2]

    Topological structure of the space of phenotypes: the case of RNA neutral networks

    Jacobo Aguirre et al. “Topological structure of the space of phenotypes: the case of RNA neutral networks”. In:PLoS ONE6 (2011), e26324

    2011

  3. [3]

    Viral quasispecies

    Raul Andino and Esteban Domingo. “Viral quasispecies”. In:Virology479-480 (2015). 60th An- niversary Issue, pp. 46–51.issn: 0042-6822.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2015. 03.022.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042682215001580

    work page doi:10.1016/j.virol.2015 2015

  4. [4]

    Intra-Population Competition during Adaptation to In- creased Temperature in an RNA Bacteriophage

    Mar´ ıa Arribas and Ester L´ azaro. “Intra-Population Competition during Adaptation to In- creased Temperature in an RNA Bacteriophage”. In:International Journal of Molecular Sci- ences22 (June 2021), p. 6815.doi:10.3390/ijms22136815

    work page doi:10.3390/ijms22136815 2021

  5. [5]

    Adaptation to Fluctuating Temperatures in an RNA Virus Is Driven by the Most Stringent Selective Pressure

    Mar´ ıa Arribas et al. “Adaptation to Fluctuating Temperatures in an RNA Virus Is Driven by the Most Stringent Selective Pressure”. In:PloS one9 (June 2014), e100940.doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0100940. 16

    2014

  6. [6]

    SARS-CoV-2 biological clones are genetically heterogeneous and include clade-discordant residues

    Ana Isabel de ´Avila et al. “SARS-CoV-2 biological clones are genetically heterogeneous and include clade-discordant residues”. In:Journal of Virology99.5 (2025), e02250–24.doi:10. 1128/jvi.02250-24. eprint:https://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/jvi.02250-24. url:https://journals.asm.org/doi/abs/10.1128/jvi.02250-24

    work page doi:10.1128/jvi.02250-24 2025

  7. [7]

    The proportion of revertant and mutant phage in a growing population, as a function of mutation and growth rate

    Eduard Batschelet, Esteban Domingo, and Charles Weissmann. “The proportion of revertant and mutant phage in a growing population, as a function of mutation and growth rate”. In: Gene1.1 (1976), pp. 27–32.issn: 0378-1119.doi:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1016 / 0378 - 1119(76 ) 90004 - 4.url:https : / / www . sciencedirect . com / science / article / pii / ...

    1976

  8. [8]

    RNA virus population diver- sity: implications for inter-species transmission

    Antonio V Border´ ıa, Kenneth A Stapleford, and Marco Vignuzzi. “RNA virus population diver- sity: implications for inter-species transmission”. In:Current Opinion in Virology1.6 (2011). In- nate immunity/Antivirals and resistance/Emerging viruses, pp. 643–648.issn: 1879-6257.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2011.09.012.url:https://www.sciencedirect....

    work page doi:10.1016/j.coviro.2011.09.012.url:https://www.sciencedirect 2011

  9. [9]

    Incipient functional SARS-CoV-2 diversification identified through neural network haplotype maps

    Soledad Delgado et al. “Incipient functional SARS-CoV-2 diversification identified through neural network haplotype maps”. In:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121.10 (2024), e2317851121.doi:10.1073/pnas.2317851121. eprint:https://www.pnas.org/doi/ pdf/10.1073/pnas.2317851121.url:https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas. 2317851121

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2317851121 2024

  10. [10]

    Viral Quasispecies Evolution

    Esteban Domingo, Julie Sheldon, and Celia Perales. “Viral Quasispecies Evolution”. In:Mi- crobiology and Molecular Biology Reviews76.2 (2012), pp. 159–216

    2012

  11. [11]

    Nucleotide sequence heterogeneity of an RNA phage population

    Esteban Domingo et al. “Nucleotide sequence heterogeneity of an RNA phage population”. In:Cell13.4 (1978), pp. 735–744.issn: 0092-8674.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0092- 8674(78)90223-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0092- 1978

  12. [12]

    Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules

    Manfred Eigen. “Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules”. In:Naturwissenschaften58 (1971), pp. 465–523

    1971

  13. [13]

    Analysis of RNA sequence structure maps by exhaustive enumeration II. Structures of neutral networks and shape space covering

    Walter Gr¨ uner et al. “Analysis of RNA sequence structure maps by exhaustive enumeration II. Structures of neutral networks and shape space covering”. In:Monatsh. Chem.127 (1996), pp. 375–389

    1996

  14. [14]

    Clonal interference and changing selective pressures shape the escape of SARS-CoV-2 from hundreds of antibodies

    Hugh K Haddox et al. “Clonal interference and changing selective pressures shape the escape of SARS-CoV-2 from hundreds of antibodies”. In:Virus Evolution12.1 (Feb. 2026), veaf104.issn: 2057-1577.doi:10.1093/ve/veaf104. eprint:https://academic.oup.com/ve/article- pdf/12/1/veaf104/66747267/veaf104.pdf.url:https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/veaf104

    work page doi:10.1093/ve/veaf104 2026

  15. [15]

    Whole Genome Deep Sequencing of HIV-1 Reveals the Impact of Early Minor Variants Upon Immune Recognition During Acute Infection

    Matthew R. Henn et al. “Whole Genome Deep Sequencing of HIV-1 Reveals the Impact of Early Minor Variants Upon Immune Recognition During Acute Infection”. In:PLOS Pathogens8.3 (Mar. 2012), pp. 1–14.doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002529.url:https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.ppat.1002529

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002529.url:https://doi.org/10 2012

  16. [16]

    Rapid Evolution of RNA Genomes

    John Holland et al. “Rapid Evolution of RNA Genomes”. In:Science215.4540 (1982), pp. 1577– 1585.doi:10.1126/science.7041255. eprint:https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10. 1126/science.7041255.url:https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science. 7041255

    work page doi:10.1126/science.7041255 1982

  17. [17]

    Breaking records in the evolutionary race

    Joachim Krug and Kavita Jain. “Breaking records in the evolutionary race”. In:Physica A: Sta- tistical Mechanics and its Applications358.1 (2005). Condensed Matter and Statistical Physics, pp. 1–9.issn: 0378-4371.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2005.06.002.url: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437105005753

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2005.06.002.url: 2005

  18. [18]

    Quasispecies Theory and the Behavior of RNA Viruses

    Adam S. Lauring and Raul Andino. “Quasispecies Theory and the Behavior of RNA Viruses”. In:PLOS Pathogens6.7 (July 2010), pp. 1–8.doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001005.url: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001005. 17

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001005.url: 2010

  19. [19]

    SARS-CoV-2 within-host diversity and transmission

    Katrina A. Lythgoe et al. “SARS-CoV-2 within-host diversity and transmission”. In:Science 372.6539 (2021), eabg0821.doi:10.1126/science.abg0821. eprint:https://www.science. org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abg0821.url:https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10. 1126/science.abg0821

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abg0821 2021

  20. [20]

    Vortmeyer, S

    Susanna Manrubia, Luis F. Seoane, and Jos´ e A. Cuesta. “The challenge of scale in molecular adaptaton: Local searches in astronomical genotype networks”. In:Integrative Theory of Evo- lution – Aspects and Insights. Ed. by Guenther Witzany. Springer, 2026.doi:10.1007/978- 3-032-24295-2_26

    work page doi:10.1007/978- 2026

  21. [21]

    Hepatitis C virus (HCV) circulates as a population of different but closely related genomes: quasispecies nature of HCV genome distribution

    M Martell et al. “Hepatitis C virus (HCV) circulates as a population of different but closely related genomes: quasispecies nature of HCV genome distribution”. In:Journal of Virology 66.5 (1992), pp. 3225–3229.doi:10 . 1128 / jvi . 66 . 5 . 3225 - 3229 . 1992. eprint:https : / / journals . asm . org / doi / pdf / 10 . 1128 / jvi . 66 . 5 . 3225 - 3229 . 1...

    work page doi:10.1128/jvi.66.5.3225-3229.1992 1992

  22. [22]

    SARS-CoV-2 Mutant Spectra at Different Depth Levels Reveal an Overwhelming Abundance of Low Frequency Mutations

    Brenda Mart´ ınez-Gonz´ alez et al. “SARS-CoV-2 Mutant Spectra at Different Depth Levels Reveal an Overwhelming Abundance of Low Frequency Mutations”. In:Pathogens11.6 (2022). issn: 2076-0817.doi:10.3390/pathogens11060662.url:https://www.mdpi.com/2076- 0817/11/6/662

    work page doi:10.3390/pathogens11060662.url:https://www.mdpi.com/2076- 2022

  23. [23]

    SARS-CoV-2 mutant spectrum complexity is an epidemio- logically evolvable trait

    Brenda Mart´ ınez-Gonz´ alez et al. “SARS-CoV-2 mutant spectrum complexity is an epidemio- logically evolvable trait”. In:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122.39 (2025), e2515706122.doi:10.1073/pnas.2515706122. eprint:https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10. 1073/pnas.2515706122.url:https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2515706122

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2515706122 2025

  24. [24]

    SARS-CoV-2 Point Mutation and Deletion Spectra and Their Association with Different Disease Outcomes

    Brenda Mart´ ınez-Gonz´ alez et al. “SARS-CoV-2 Point Mutation and Deletion Spectra and Their Association with Different Disease Outcomes”. In:Microbiology Spectrum10.2 (2022), e00221– 22.doi:10.1128/spectrum.00221-22. eprint:https://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10. 1128/spectrum.00221-22.url:https://journals.asm.org/doi/abs/10.1128/spectrum. 00221-22

    work page doi:10.1128/spectrum.00221-22 2022

  25. [25]

    Increased RNA virus population diversity improves adaptability

    Florian Mattenberger, Marina Vila-Nistal, and Ron Geller. “Increased RNA virus population diversity improves adaptability”. In:Scientific Reports11.1 (Mar. 2021), p. 6824.issn: 2045- 2322.doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86375-z.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021- 86375-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86375-z.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021- 2021

  26. [26]

    Structure and dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 proofreading exoribonu- clease ExoN

    Nicholas H. Moeller et al. “Structure and dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 proofreading exoribonu- clease ExoN”. In:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119.9 (2022), e2106379119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2106379119.url:https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas. 2106379119

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2106379119.url:https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas 2022

  27. [27]

    Assortative mixing in networks

    M. E. J. Newman. “Assortative mixing in networks”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.89 (2002), p. 208701

    2002

  28. [28]

    M. E. J. Newman.Networks: An introduction. Oxford University Press, New York, 2010

    2010

  29. [29]

    High-throughput sequencing (HTS) for the analysis of viral pop- ulations

    Marcos P´ erez-Losada et al. “High-throughput sequencing (HTS) for the analysis of viral pop- ulations”. In:Infection, Genetics and Evolution80 (2020), p. 104208.issn: 1567-1348.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104208.url:https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S156713482030040X

    work page doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104208.url:https://www.sciencedirect 2020

  30. [30]

    Recent advances in inferring viral diversity from high-throughput sequ encing data

    Susana Posada-Cespedes, David Seifert, and Niko Beerenwinkel. “Recent advances in inferring viral diversity from high-throughput sequ encing data”. In:Virus Research239 (2017). Deep sequencing in virology, pp. 17–32.issn: 0168-1702.doi:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1016 / j . virusres.2016.09.016.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0168...

    2017

  31. [31]

    Deep sequencing in the management of hepatitis virus infections

    Josep Quer et al. “Deep sequencing in the management of hepatitis virus infections”. In:Virus Research239 (2017). Deep sequencing in virology, pp. 115–125.issn: 0168-1702.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2016.12.020.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0168170216304567. 18

    work page doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2016.12.020.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/ 2017

  32. [32]

    Growth and Structural Transformation

    Rafael Sanju´ an and Pilar Domingo-Calap. “Genetic Diversity and Evolution of Viral Popula- tions”. In:Encyclopedia of Virology (Fourth Edition). Ed. by Dennis H. Bamford and Mark Zuckerman. Fourth Edition. Oxford: Academic Press, 2021, pp. 53–61.isbn: 978-0-12-814516- 6.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978- 0- 12- 809633- 8.20958- 8.url:https://www. scienced...

    work page doi:10.1016/b978- 2021

  33. [33]

    The total number and mass of SARS-CoV-2 virions

    Ron Sender et al. “The total number and mass of SARS-CoV-2 virions”. In:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118.25 (2021), e2024815118.doi:10.1073/pnas.2024815118. eprint:https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2024815118.url:https://www. pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2024815118

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2024815118 2021

  34. [34]

    Hierarchical genotype networks and incipient ecological speciation in Qβphage quasispecies

    Lu´ ıs F. Seoane et al. “Hierarchical genotype networks and incipient ecological speciation in Qβphage quasispecies”. In:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences123.14 (2026), e2512150123.doi:10.1073/pnas.2512150123. eprint:https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10. 1073/pnas.2512150123.url:https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2512150123

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2512150123 2026

  35. [35]

    Evolutionary Dynamics in the RNA Bacteriophage QβDepends on the Pattern of Change in Selective Pressures

    Pilar Somovilla, Susanna Manrubia, and Ester L´ azaro. “Evolutionary Dynamics in the RNA Bacteriophage QβDepends on the Pattern of Change in Selective Pressures”. In:Pathogens 8.2 (2019).doi:10.3390/pathogens8020080

    work page doi:10.3390/pathogens8020080 2019

  36. [36]

    Standing Genetic Diversity and Transmission Bottleneck Size Drive Adaptation in Bacteriophage Qβ

    Pilar Somovilla et al. “Standing Genetic Diversity and Transmission Bottleneck Size Drive Adaptation in Bacteriophage Qβ”. In:International Journal of Molecular Sciences23.16 (2022). doi:10.3390/ijms23168876

    work page doi:10.3390/ijms23168876 2022

  37. [37]

    The mutational landscape of SARS-CoV-2 provides new insight into viral evolution and fitness

    Jori Symons et al. “The mutational landscape of SARS-CoV-2 provides new insight into viral evolution and fitness”. In:Nature Communications16.1 (July 2025), p. 6425.issn: 2041-1723. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61555-x.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-61555- x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61555-x.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-61555- 2025

  38. [38]

    Genotype-to-Protein Map and Collective Adaptation in a Viral Pop- ulation

    Ariadna Villanueva et al. “Genotype-to-Protein Map and Collective Adaptation in a Viral Pop- ulation”. In:Biophysica2.4 (2022), pp. 381–399.issn: 2673-4125.doi:10.3390/biophysica2040034. url:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4125/2/4/34

    work page doi:10.3390/biophysica2040034 2022

  39. [39]

    Immunity-induced criticality of the genotype network of influenza A (H3N2) hemagglutinin

    Blake J M Williams et al. “Immunity-induced criticality of the genotype network of influenza A (H3N2) hemagglutinin”. In:PNAS Nexus1.4 (Aug. 2022), pgac143.doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/ pgac143. eprint:https : / / academic . oup . com / pnasnexus / article - pdf / 1 / 4 / pgac143 / 48849248/pgac143.pdf.url:https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac143. 19 Supplement...

    work page doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/ 2022