Review of Yau's conjecture on zero sets of Laplace eigenfunctions

Alexander Logunov; Eugenia Malinnikova

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 96 references

Review of Yau's conjecture on zero sets of Laplace eigenfunctions

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The review reports that in the smooth case the zero set of a Laplace eigenfunction has size at least $c\sqrt{\lambda}$ and at most $C\lambda^{Cn}$, with the sharp upper bound still open in dimension 2.

desk verdict Useful survey of Yau's conjecture by the authors who proved the smooth case; main body is reliable, but Section 11's uncited optimal Dirichlet bound needs a citation or a caveat. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01639 v1 pith:3HEDDDIK submitted 2019-08-05 math.AP math.CAmath.CVmath.DGmath.SP

Alexander Logunov , Eugenia Malinnikova This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.APmath.CAmath.CVmath.DGmath.SP MSC 35B6035J0558J50

keywords LaplaceeigenfunctionsnodalsetsYau'sconjectureHausdorffmeasuredoublingindexNadirashvili'suniquecontinuationRiemannianmanifolds

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review lays out the proof of Yau's conjecture, which predicts that the zero set of a Laplace eigenfunction $\phi_\lambda$ on a smooth closed $n$-manifold has $(n-1)$-dimensional Hausdorff measure comparable to $\sqrt{\lambda}$. The central news is that in the smooth case the lower bound is now a theorem, $H^{n-1}(\{\phi_\lambda=0\})\ge c\sqrt{\lambda}$, obtained by solving Nadirashvili's conjecture about harmonic functions in $\mathbb{R}^3$. The upper bound is proved in the weaker polynomial form $H^{n-1}(\{\phi_\lambda=0\})\le C\lambda^{Cn}$, while the original sharp upper bound $C\sqrt{\lambda}$ remains open even for surfaces. For real-analytic metrics the conjecture is fully proved, and the review explains the machinery (doubling index, frequency function, harmonic extension, multiscale iteration) that carries the arguments. The result ties nodal geometry quantitatively to eigenfunction growth: the size of the nodal set is controlled by how fast the eigenfunction doubles across concentric balls.

What carries the argument

The central object is the doubling index $N_f(B)=\log_2(\sup_{2B}|f|/\sup_B|f|)$, a single number that measures how fast a solution grows from a ball to a concentric ball of twice the radius; locally it controls the vanishing order, and it is nearly interchangeable with Almgren's frequency function, whose monotonicity in the radius is the main analytic engine. The harmonic extension $u(x,t)=\phi_\lambda(x)e^{\sqrt{\lambda}t}$ converts an eigenfunction on $M$ into a harmonic function on $M\times\mathbb{R}$ whose zero set is the cylinder over the nodal set, so every estimate can be made for solutions of a fixed divergence-form elliptic equation with smooth or Lipschitz coefficients. The proofs then run on two multiscale devices: the lemma on the distribution of doubling index, which says that a cube of high index can be subdivided so that almost all small subcubes have index at most half the original; and the key lemma on stable growth, which says that a harmonic function with high stable growth contains many disjoint balls of radius $r/\sqrt{N}$ where it vanishes at the centre. These feed a recursion $F(N)\le 2KF(N/2)$ for the upper bound and a contradiction $F(N)>2F(N)$ for the lower bound, the latter needing the simplex lemma, the hyperplane lemma, and quantitative Cauchy uniqueness to control how high-index points can be arranged.

What would settle it

One concrete check is to take the simplified key lemma from Section 10.2 (Proposition 6.1 of [56]) at face value: a harmonic function with stable growth of order $N$ in a ball $B_r(x)$ is claimed to contain at least $c[\sqrt{N}]^{2c\log N/\log\log N}$ disjoint balls of radius $r/\sqrt{N}$ with zeros at their centres. A numerical search among high-degree harmonic polynomials (for instance $\Re(x_1+ix_2)^N$ or zonal harmonics) at large $N$ could confirm or contradict that multiplicity. If a single harmonic function in the unit ball with $u(0)=0$ had zero-set area tending to zero along a sequence, the harmonic-function conjecture and the lower bound in Yau's conjecture would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The review's central claim is that Yau's conjecture is now largely resolved in the smooth case. Papers [55] and [56] are credited with the polynomial upper bound $H^{n-1}(\{\phi_\lambda=0\})\le C\lambda^{Cn}$ for Laplace eigenfunctions on closed $C^\infty$ Riemannian $n$-manifolds, and with the sharp lower bound $H^{n-1}(\{\phi_\lambda=0\})\ge c\sqrt{\lambda}$, the latter obtained by proving a conjecture about harmonic functions: any solution of a uniformly elliptic equation with Lipschitz coefficients in the unit ball, vanishing at the centre, has zero-set $(n-1)$-measure at least a constant times $r^{n-1}$ on every ball $B_r$. The review presents the lower-bound proof as a multiscale contradiction argument built on a key lemma about stable growth, and the upper-bound proof as a recursion from a lemma on the distribution of doubling indices. It credits [29] with the full sharp bound in the real-analytic case and reports that in dimension two the best known upper bound is $C\lambda^{3/4-\varepsilon}$, leaving the original upper bound open. It also asserts, as a theorem stated without proof or citation, that for a bounded domain with smooth boundary the Dirichlet eigenfunction's nodal set satisfies $H^{n-1}(Z_{\phi_\lambda})\le C_\Omega\sqrt{\lambda}$ once the boundary is included, with a matching lower bound.

Load-bearing premise

The review's account of the smooth-case theorems rests on a chain of technical lemmas about the distribution of doubling indices and about stable growth, whose complete proofs are not included here; the optimal Dirichlet-domain upper bound in Section 11 is additionally presented without proof or citation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

On every smooth closed manifold, the $(n-1)$-dimensional measure of a nodal hypersurface is at least $c\sqrt{\lambda}$, so nodal sets cannot become sparse as the eigenvalue grows.
The same measure is at most $C\lambda^{Cn}$, so nodal sets cannot explode faster than a fixed power of the eigenvalue; no exponentially large nodal sets occur.
For real-analytic metrics the full Yau bound $c\sqrt{\lambda}\le H^{n-1}(\{\phi_\lambda=0\})\le C\sqrt{\lambda}$ holds, covering the spherical harmonics and other analytic examples.
For Dirichlet eigenfunctions in smooth bounded domains, with the boundary included in the nodal set, the review asserts the optimal bound $H^{n-1}(Z_{\phi_\lambda})\le C_\Omega\sqrt{\lambda}$ along with a matching lower bound.
In dimension two the sharp upper bound remains open; the current record for general surfaces is $C\lambda^{3/4-\varepsilon}$, leaving a gap to the conjectured $C\sqrt{\lambda}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Extension: if the optimal Dirichlet-domain bound asserted in Section 11 were supplied with a complete proof, it would immediately improve the state of the art for manifolds with boundary and would test whether the sharp upper bound transfers to all smooth settings.
Extension: the multiscale recursion in the upper-bound proof suggests a general template for bounding other geometric measures attached to solutions of elliptic equations, such as critical sets; the known singular-set bound $H^{n-2}(S(u)\cap B)\le CN^2$ sits in that same family.
Extension: the lower-bound proof's dependence on stable growth suggests that the constant $c$ in Yau's lower bound should be effectively computable from the metric and dimension once the distribution of doubling indices is understood.
Extension: one could test the key lemma numerically on high-degree harmonic polynomials, checking whether the predicted number of disjoint zero-centred balls at scale $r/\sqrt{N}$ actually appears; this would give independent evidence for the lower-bound theorem.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The short version: this is a useful review of the Yau conjecture by the two people who proved the main smooth-case theorems. It contains no new results, but it does something valuable: it lays out the history from Brüning to Donnelly–Fefferman to the recent polynomial upper bound and matching lower bound, with enough detail that a nonspecialist can see the shape of the arguments. The proof sketches in Sections 9 and 10 are honest about what they omit, and the key lemmas they assert (distribution of doubling index, simplex and hyperplane lemmas, stable growth) are backed by the authors' Annals papers [55] and [56]. For a survey, that is enough.

The one thing I would press on is Section 11. It states, as a theorem, that for a bounded domain with smooth boundary the Dirichlet eigenfunction nodal set satisfies H^{n-1}(Z_{φλ}) ≤ C_Ω √λ, with the matching lower bound, and attributes the sharp upper bound to an oral comment by Nazarov during a 2017 IAS talk. No citation, no proof, no reference to a written source. That is an optimal, load-bearing claim in that section. If the result is in the literature, the review needs to say where; if it is not, the review is presenting folklore as established fact. The main closed-manifold survey is unaffected, but this undermines the review's reliability as a reference.

Minor point: the proof sketches rely on a chain of lemmas that are asserted rather than demonstrated. That is acceptable in a review because the full proofs are cited, but a reader who wants to verify the survey's account has to go to the original papers. There are also a handful of typos ("Remannian", "wtih") that a copyeditor would catch.

I would send this to peer review. The survey is written by the right people, covers the area responsibly, and will be a standard reference. The referee should ask for the Section 11 statement to be either cited or toned down.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This survey reviews Yau's conjecture on the Hausdorff measure of zero sets of Laplace eigenfunctions. It covers the classical real-analytic results of Donnelly and Fefferman, the recent polynomial upper bound and the lower bound for smooth closed manifolds obtained by the first author, and two-dimensional methods. The paper includes proof sketches of the new results and discusses related open problems, including a section on Dirichlet eigenfunctions in bounded domains.

Significance. The main theorems surveyed, the lower bound H^{n-1}(Z_{\phi_\lambda}) \ge c\sqrt{\lambda} and the polynomial upper bound H^{n-1}(Z_{\phi_\lambda}) \le C\lambda^{Cn} for smooth closed manifolds, are published in Annals of Mathematics [55],[56], and the survey accurately conveys their statements and the structure of the proofs. The proof sketches in Sections 9 and 10 rely on asserted lemmas, but the authors label these as sketches and the underlying results are independently checkable in the cited publications, so this is not a serious weakness. The principal caveat is Section 11, which states an optimal upper bound for Dirichlet domains without proof or citation; this is the main reason the manuscript needs revision.

major comments (2)

[11] The Theorem in Section 11 and the paragraph that follows state that for any bounded smooth domain \Omega, Dirichlet eigenfunctions satisfy H^{n-1}(Z_{\phi_\lambda}) \le C_\Omega \sqrt{\lambda}, with the improvement over the displayed log bound attributed to an oral remark by Nazarov. No proof or reference is given for this optimal bound, for the preceding log bound, or for the accompanying lower bound. Since this section is part of a survey of the state of the art, an unverifiable claim of an optimal result is load-bearing for the paper's factual reliability. Please supply a citation to a published or preprint source, or explicitly label these statements as unpublished announcements and state the precise hypotheses.
[11] The lower-bound assertion 'H^{n-1}(Z_{\phi_\lambda}) \ge c_\Omega \sqrt{\lambda} (if we include the boundary of \Omega)' is ambiguous because H^{n-1}(\partial\Omega) is a fixed constant; as stated, the lower bound cannot be read as a single inequality valid for all \lambda unless the intended meaning is that the interior nodal set plus the boundary has measure growing like \sqrt{\lambda}. Please clarify the statement and provide references for the two proofs attributed to Donnelly and Fefferman and to Nadirashvili's conjecture.

minor comments (4)

[8.3] The text states that the bound H^{n-2}(S(u) \cap B) \le C N^2 was obtained by Naber and Valtorta [68] and then immediately states that it is not known whether this estimate holds even for harmonic functions in R^3. These statements cannot both be correct; please reconcile the wording, indicating which bound is known and which is conjectural.
[3.7] The composition 'h = g \circ u' is not well-defined as written because u is real-valued and g is a self-map of the disk; presumably the intended statement is that a solution of the transformed divergence-form equation is a harmonic function composed with a quasiconformal map (for instance u = h \circ g or u \circ g is harmonic). Please correct the direction of composition.
[10.2] In the statement of the key lemma, the factor 'c[\sqrt{N}]n-1' should be typeset as c(\sqrt{N})^{n-1}. Since the section is restricted to harmonic functions in R^3, the dimension n should either be fixed to 3 or the statement should explicitly allow general dimension.
[Global] The manuscript contains numerous typographical errors, including 'Remannian' and 'Reimannian' for 'Riemannian', 'functons', 'extesnion', 'propogation', and inconsistent spacing around citations. A careful proofreading pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review reports published, independently checkable results, and its proof sketches do not reduce to their own inputs.

full rationale

This is a survey article describing the authors' own published theorems [55] and [56], together with earlier work by Donnelly and Fefferman and others. The main claims—the polynomial upper bound and the linear lower bound for nodal sets on closed smooth manifolds—are presented as results established in those Annals papers, which are peer-reviewed, parameter-free, and do not assume the target theorem. The proof sketches in Sections 9 and 10 cite specific lemmas (the distribution of doubling index, the simplex and hyperplane lemmas, the key lemma, and the stable-growth lemma) to published sources [55] and [56]; even though those sources are authored by the same researchers, they are external, checkable arguments rather than assumptions built into the review. No parameter is fitted to data and then renamed a prediction, and no quantity is defined in terms of the quantity it is supposed to derive. The only notable weakness is Section 11, where the optimal Dirichlet-domain bound H^{n-1}(Z_{\phi_\lambda}) ≤ C_Ω √λ is stated with an informal anecdote about Fedor Nazarov and without a citation or proof. That is a missing-reference or reliability concern, not a circularity concern, because the assertion is not derived from, nor equivalent to, any input of the review. The heavy self-citation is expected for a review written by the authors of the results being surveyed and does not by itself constitute circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review contributes no fitted parameters and no invented entities. Its central survey rests on standard results in elliptic PDE, unique continuation and spectral geometry, all of which are cited in the text.

assumptions (5)

standard math Unique continuation principle for elliptic equations with Lipschitz coefficients
Invoked in Sections 7 and 9 as the basis for quantitative propagation of smallness and the proof of the polynomial upper bound.
standard math Monotonicity of the frequency function (Almgren; Garofalo-Lin for variable coefficients)
Used to control doubling indices and to prove the simplex lemma and the lemma on stable growth in Sections 6.2, 9 and 10.2.
standard math Harnack inequality for solutions of uniformly elliptic equations
Used in Section 10.2 to bound multiplicative growth of solutions across cubes in a tunnel.
standard math Real-analyticity of solutions to elliptic equations with real-analytic coefficients, including holomorphic extension with e^{C√λ} growth
Used in Section 4 to reproduce the Donnelly-Fefferman solution of the real-analytic case.
standard math Weyl asymptotic law for the eigenvalue counting function
Used in Section 5.1 to estimate the number of eigenvalues in a dyadic spectral window.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Review of Yau's conjecture on zero sets of Laplace eigenfunctions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3HEDDDIK

@misc{pith2026190801639,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Review of Yau's conjecture on zero sets of Laplace eigenfunctions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3HEDDDIK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01639}
}

read the original abstract

This is a review of old and new results and methods related to the Yau conjecture on the zero set of Laplace eigenfunctions. The review accompanies two lectures given at the conference CDM 2018. We discuss the works of Donnelly and Fefferman including their solution of the conjecture in the case of real-analytic Riemannian manifolds. The review exposes the new results for Yau's conjecture in the smooth setting. We try to avoid technical details and emphasize the main ideas of the proof of Nadirashvili's conjecture. We also discuss two-dimensional methods to study zero sets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

[55]

A. Logunov. Nodal sets of Laplace eigenfunctions: polynomial upper estimates of the Hausdorﬀ measure. Ann. of Math. (2) , 187(1):221–239, 2018

work page 2018
[56]

A. Logunov. Nodal sets of Laplace eigenfunctions: proof of N adirashvili’s conjecture and of the lower bound in Yau’s conjecture. Ann. of Math. (2) , 187(1):241–262, 2018

work page 2018
[1]

https://www.math.ias.edu/ﬁles/report.pdf

Report on Workshop on Emerging Topics: Nodal sets of Eigenfun ctions, IAS, 2017. https://www.math.ias.edu/ﬁles/report.pdf. Accessed:2018-10-3 0

2017
[2]

Unicit´ e et convexit´ e dans les probl` emes diﬀ´ erentiels

Shmuel Agmon. Unicit´ e et convexit´ e dans les probl` emes diﬀ´ erentiels. S´ eminaire de Math´ ematiques Sup´ erieures, No. 13 (´Et´ e, 1965). Les Presses de l’Universit´ e de Montr´ eal, Montreal,Que., 1966

1965
[3]

The stability for the Cauchy problem for elliptic equations

Giovanni Alessandrini, Luca Rondi, Edi Rosset, and Sergio Vesse lla. The stability for the Cauchy problem for elliptic equations. Inverse Problems , 25(12):123004, 47, 2009

2009
[4]

J. F. Almgren Jr. Dirichlet’s problem for multiple valued functions an d the regularity of mass min- imizing integral currents. In Minimal submanifolds and geodesics (Proc. Japan-United St ates Sem., Tokyo, 1977) , pages 1–6. North-Holland, Amsterdam-New York, 1979

1977
[5]

Aronszajn

N. Aronszajn. A unique continuation theorem for solutions of ellip tic partial diﬀerential equations or inequalities of second order. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) , 36:235–249, 1957

1957
[6]

Elliptic Partial Diﬀerential Equations and Qua- siconformal Mappings in the Plane (PMS-48)

Kari Astala, Tadeusz Iwaniec, and Gaven Martin. Elliptic Partial Diﬀerential Equations and Qua- siconformal Mappings in the Plane (PMS-48) . Princeton University Press, 2009

2009

Show all 96 references

[7]

B´ erard and B

P. B´ erard and B. Helﬀer. A. Stern’s analysis of the nodal sets o f some families of spherical harmonics revisited. Monatsh. Math. , 180(3):435–468, 2016

2016
[8]

Courant-sharp eigenvalue s for the equilateral torus, and for the equilateral triangle

Pierre B´ erard and Bernard Helﬀer. Courant-sharp eigenvalue s for the equilateral torus, and for the equilateral triangle. Lett. Math. Phys. , 106(12):1729–1789, 2016

2016
[9]

Local behavior of solutions of general linear elliptic e quations

Lipman Bers. Local behavior of solutions of general linear elliptic e quations. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 8(4):473–496, 1955

1955
[10]

B. Bojanov. Elementary proof of the Remez inequality. Amer. Math. Monthly , 100(5):483–485, 1993

1993
[11]

Bourgain and T

J. Bourgain and T. Wolﬀ. A remark on gradients of harmonic func tions in dimension ≥ 3. Colloq. Math., 60/61(1):253–260, 1990. 35

1990
[12]

Spectral gaps without the pressure condition

Jean Bourgain and Semyon Dyatlov. Spectral gaps without the pressure condition. Ann. of Math. (2), 187(3):825–867, 2018

2018
[13]

On the geometry of the noda l lines of eigenfunctions of the two- dimensional torus

Jean Bourgain and Ze´ ev Rudnick. On the geometry of the noda l lines of eigenfunctions of the two- dimensional torus. Ann. Henri Poincar´ e, 12(6):1027–1053, 2011

2011
[14]

On the nodal sets of toral e igenfunctions

Jean Bourgain and Ze´ ev Rudnick. On the nodal sets of toral e igenfunctions. Invent. Math. , 185(1):199–237, 2011

2011
[15]

Restriction of toral eigenfu nctions to hypersurfaces and nodal sets

Jean Bourgain and Ze´ ev Rudnick. Restriction of toral eigenfu nctions to hypersurfaces and nodal sets. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 22(4):878–937, 2012

2012
[16]

¨Uber Knoten von Eigenfunktionen des Laplace-Beltrami-Operator s

Jochen Br¨ uning. ¨Uber Knoten von Eigenfunktionen des Laplace-Beltrami-Operator s. Math. Z. , 158(1):15–21, 1978

1978
[17]

Caﬀarelli and Avner Friedman

Luis A. Caﬀarelli and Avner Friedman. Partial regularity of the z ero-set of solutions of linear and superlinear elliptic equations. J. Diﬀerential Equations , 60(3):420–433, 1985

1985
[18]

Topology and nesting of the z ero set components of monochromatic random waves

Yaiza Canzani and Peter Sarnak. Topology and nesting of the z ero set components of monochromatic random waves. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 72(2):343–374, 2019

2019
[19]

Carleman

T. Carleman. Sur un probl` eme d’unicit´ e pur les syst` emes d’´equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles ` a deux variables ind´ ependantes.Ark. Mat., Astr. Fys. , 26(17):9, 1939

1939
[20]

Muckenhoupt

Sagun Chanillo and B. Muckenhoupt. Nodal geometry on Riemann ian manifolds. J. Diﬀerential Geom., 34(1):85–91, 1991

1991
[21]

Eigenvalues in Riemannian geometry , volume 115 of Pure and Applied Mathematics

Isaac Chavel. Eigenvalues in Riemannian geometry , volume 115 of Pure and Applied Mathematics . Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL, 1984. Including a chapter by Bu rton Randol, With an appendix by Jozef Dodziuk

1984
[22]

Riemannian geometry , volume 98 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics

Isaac Chavel. Riemannian geometry , volume 98 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 2006. A mo dern introduction

2006
[23]

Critical sets of elliptic equations

Jeﬀ Cheeger, Aaron Naber, and Daniele Valtorta. Critical sets of elliptic equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 68(2):173–209, 2015

2015
[24]

Eigenfunctions and nodal sets

Shiu Yuen Cheng. Eigenfunctions and nodal sets. Comment. Math. Helv. , 51(1):43–55, 1976

1976
[25]

Colding and William P

Tobias H. Colding and William P. Minicozzi, II. Lower bounds for noda l sets of eigenfunctions. Comm. Math. Phys. , 306(3):777–784, 2011

2011
[26]

H. O. Cordes. ¨Uber die eindeutige Bestimmtheit der L¨ osungen elliptischer Diﬀerent ialgleichungen durch Anfangsvorgaben. Nachr. Akad. Wiss. G¨ ottingen. Math.-Phys. Kl. IIa. , 1956:239–258, 1956

1956
[27]

Unique continuation for solutions to pde’s; betwe en hrmander’s theorem and holm- gren’ theorem

Tataru Daniel. Unique continuation for solutions to pde’s; betwe en hrmander’s theorem and holm- gren’ theorem. Communications in Partial Diﬀerential Equations , 20(5-6):855–884, 1995

1995
[28]

Nodal sets of eigenfunctions on Riemann surfac es

Rui-Tao Dong. Nodal sets of eigenfunctions on Riemann surfac es. J. Diﬀerential Geom. , 36(2):493– 506, 1992

1992
[29]

Donnelly and C

H. Donnelly and C. Feﬀerman. Nodal sets of eigenfunctions on R iemannian manifolds. Invent. Math., 93:161–183, 1988. 36 A. LOGUNOV AND E. MALINNIKOV A

1988
[30]

Donnelly and C

H. Donnelly and C. Feﬀerman. Growth and geometry of eigenfun ctions of the Laplacian. In Analysis and partial diﬀerential equations , volume 122 of Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math. , pages 635–
[31]

Donnelly and Ch

H. Donnelly and Ch. Feﬀerman. Nodal sets for eigenfunctions o f the Laplacian on surfaces. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 3(2):333–353, 1990

1990
[32]

Semiclassical measures on hyperb olic surfaces have full support

Semyon Dyatlov and Long Jin. Semiclassical measures on hyperb olic surfaces have full support. Acta Math., 220(2):297–339, 2018

2018
[33]

Laplac e operators with eigenfunctions whose nodal set is a knot

Alberto Enciso, David Hartley, and Daniel Peralta-Salas. Laplac e operators with eigenfunctions whose nodal set is a knot. J. Funct. Anal. , 271(1):182–200, 2016

2016
[34]

Eigenfunctions with pr escribed nodal sets

Alberto Enciso and Daniel Peralta-Salas. Eigenfunctions with pr escribed nodal sets. J. Diﬀerential Geom., 101(2):197–211, 2015

2015
[35]

On nodal sets and nodal domains on S2 and R2

Alexandre Eremenko, Dmitry Jakobson, and Nikolai Nadirashvili. On nodal sets and nodal domains on S2 and R2. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 57(7):2345–2360, 2007. Festival Yves Colin de Verdi` ere

2007
[36]

Garofalo and F

N. Garofalo and F. Lin. Monotonicity properties of variational in tegrals, Ap weights and unique continuation. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 35(2):245–268, 1986

1986
[37]

Singular sets of solutions to elliptic equations

Qing Han. Singular sets of solutions to elliptic equations. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 43(3):983–1002, 1994

1994
[38]

Nodal sets of harmonic functions

Qing Han. Nodal sets of harmonic functions. Pure Appl. Math. Q. , 3(3, Special Issue: In honor of Leon Simon. Part 2):647–688, 2007

2007
[39]

Geometric measure o f singular sets of elliptic equations

Qing Han, Robert Hardt, and Fanghua Lin. Geometric measure o f singular sets of elliptic equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 51(11-12):1425–1443, 1998

1998
[40]

A geometric covering lemma and nod al sets of eigenfunctions

Xiaolong Han and Guozhen Lu. A geometric covering lemma and nod al sets of eigenfunctions. Math. Res. Lett., 18(2):337–352, 2011

2011
[41]

Hardt, M

R. Hardt, M. Hoﬀmann-Ostenhof, T. Hoﬀmann-Ostenhof, an d N. Nadirashvili. Critical sets of solu- tions to elliptic equations. J. Diﬀerential Geom. , 51(2):359–373, 1999

1999
[42]

Hardt and L

R. Hardt and L. Simon. Nodal sets for solutions of elliptic equatio ns. J. Diﬀerential Geom. , 30(2):505– 522, 1989

1989
[43]

Applications of small-scale quantum ergodicity in nod al sets

Hamid Hezari. Applications of small-scale quantum ergodicity in nod al sets. Anal. PDE , 11(4):855– 871, 2018

2018
[44]

Hamid Hezari and Christopher D. Sogge. A natural lower bound for the size of nodal sets. Anal. PDE, 5(5):1133–1137, 2012

2012
[45]

Hoﬀmann-Ostenhof, T

M. Hoﬀmann-Ostenhof, T. Hoﬀmann-Ostenhof, and N. Nadira shvili. Critical sets of smooth solutions to elliptic equations in dimension 3. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 45(1):15–37, 1996

1996
[46]

On some proper- ties of zero sets and critical sets of solutions to elliptic equations

Maria Hoﬀmann-Ostenhof, Thomas Hoﬀmann-Ostenhof, and N ikolai Nadirashvili. On some proper- ties of zero sets and critical sets of solutions to elliptic equations. I n Partial diﬀerential equations and their applications (Toronto, ON, 1995) , volume 12 of CRM Proc. Lecture Not...

1995
[47]

Tubular neighborhoods of n odal sets and Diophantine approx- imation

Dmitry Jakobson and Dan Mangoubi. Tubular neighborhoods of n odal sets and Diophantine approx- imation. Amer. J. Math. , 131(4):1109–1135, 2009

2009
[48]

Eigenfunctions with few critical points

Dmitry Jakobson and Nikolai Nadirashvili. Eigenfunctions with few critical points. J. Diﬀerential Geom., 53(1):177–182, 1999

1999
[49]

Quasi-symmetry of Lp norms of eigenfunctions

Dmitry Jakobson and Nikolai Nadirashvili. Quasi-symmetry of Lp norms of eigenfunctions. Comm. Anal. Geom., 10(2):397–408, 2002

2002
[50]

Plane waves and spherical means applied to partial diﬀerent ial equations

Fritz John. Plane waves and spherical means applied to partial diﬀerent ial equations . Courier Cor- poration, 2004

2004
[51]

Nodal le ngth ﬂuctuations for arithmetic random waves

Manjunath Krishnapur, Pr Kurlberg, and Igor Wigman. Nodal le ngth ﬂuctuations for arithmetic random waves. Annals of Mathematics , 177(2):699–737, 2013

2013
[52]

E. M. Landis. Some questions in the qualitative theory of second -order elliptic equations (case of several independent variables). Uspehi Mat. Nauk , 18(1 (109)):3–62, 1963

1963
[53]

Nodal sets of solutions of elliptic and parabolic equ ations

Fang-Hua Lin. Nodal sets of solutions of elliptic and parabolic equ ations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 44(3):287–308, 1991

1991
[54]

On the Betti numbers of level sets of s olutions to elliptic equations

Fanghua Lin and Dan Liu. On the Betti numbers of level sets of s olutions to elliptic equations. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 36(8):4517–4529, 2016

2016
[57]

Logunov and E

A. Logunov and E. Malinnikova. Nodal sets of laplace eigenfunct ions: Estimates of the hausdorﬀ measure in dimensions two and three. In 50 Years with Hardy Spaces, A Tribute to Victor Havin , volume 261 of Operator Theory: Advances and Applications , pages 333 –344. Birkh¨ a u...

2018
[58]

Logunov and E

A. Logunov and E. Malinnikova. Quantitative propogation of sma llness for solutions of elliptic equa- tions. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicia ns—Rio de Janeiro 2018 , vol- ume 2 of ICM, pages 2357–2378. World Scientiﬁc, 2018

2018
[59]

Logunov and E

A. Logunov and E. Malinnikova. Quantitative unique continuation for second order elliptic equations. In Harmonic analysis , IAS/Park City Math. Ser. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 201 8
[60]

On ratios of harmon ic functions

Alexander Logunov and Eugenia Malinnikova. On ratios of harmon ic functions. Advances in Math- ematics, 274:241 – 262, 2015

2015
[61]

Covering lemmas and an application to nodal geomet ry on Riemannian manifolds

Guozhen Lu. Covering lemmas and an application to nodal geomet ry on Riemannian manifolds. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 117(4):971–978, 1993

1993
[62]

Mangoubi

D. Mangoubi. The eﬀect of curvature on convexity properties of harmonic functions and eigenfunc- tions. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) , 87(3):645–662, 2013

2013
[63]

Local asymmetry and the inner radius of nodal d omains

Dan Mangoubi. Local asymmetry and the inner radius of nodal d omains. Comm. Partial Diﬀerential Equations, 33(7-9):1611–1621, 2008

2008
[64]

The volume of a local nodal domain

Dan Mangoubi. The volume of a local nodal domain. J. Topol. Anal. , 2(2):259–275, 2010. 38 A. LOGUNOV AND E. MALINNIKOV A

2010
[65]

A remark on recent lower bounds for nodal sets

Dan Mangoubi. A remark on recent lower bounds for nodal sets . Comm. Partial Diﬀerential Equa- tions, 36(12):2208–2212, 2011

2011
[66]

Nonunique continuation for uniformly parabolic and ellip tic equations in selfadjoint divergence form with H¨ older continuous coeﬃcients

Keith Miller. Nonunique continuation for uniformly parabolic and ellip tic equations in selfadjoint divergence form with H¨ older continuous coeﬃcients. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. , 79:350–354, 1973

1973
[67]

C. B. Morrey Jr. and L. Nirenberg. On the analyticity of the solu tions of linear elliptic systems of partial diﬀerential equations. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 10(2):271–290, 1957

1957
[68]

Volume estimates on the critic al sets of solutions to elliptic PDEs

Aaron Naber and Daniele Valtorta. Volume estimates on the critic al sets of solutions to elliptic PDEs. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 70(10):1835–1897, 2017

2017
[69]

Nadirashvili, Dzh

N. Nadirashvili, Dzh. Tot, and D. Yakobson. Geometric propert ies of eigenfunctions. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 56(6(342)):67–88, 2001

2001
[70]

N. S. Nadirashvili. Uniqueness and stability of continuation from a set to the domain of solution of an elliptic equation. Mat. Zametki , 40(2):218–225, 287, 1986

1986
[71]

N. S. Nadirashvili. The length of the nodal curve of an eigenfunc tion of the Laplace operator. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk , 43(4(262)):219–220, 1988

1988
[72]

Nadirashvili

Nikolai S. Nadirashvili. Metric properties of eigenfunctions of th e Laplace operator on manifolds. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) , 41(1):259–265, 1991

1991
[73]

Nadirashvili

Nikolai S. Nadirashvili. Some topics in spectral geometry. In S´ eminaire de Th´ eorie Spectrale et G´ eom´ etrie, No. 9, Ann´ ee 1990–1991, volume 9 of S´ emin. Th´ eor. Spectr. G´ eom., pages 9–12. Univ. Grenoble I, Saint-Martin-d’H` eres, 1991

1990
[74]

Nadirashvili

Nikolai S. Nadirashvili. Geometry of nodal sets and multiplicity of e igenvalues. volume 1997 of Current Developments in Mathematics , pages 231–235. International Press, 1998

1997
[75]

N. S. Nadiraˇ svili. Estimation of the solutions of elliptic equations w ith analytic coeﬃcients which are bounded on some set. Vestnik Moskov. Univ. Ser. I Mat. Mekh. , (2):42–46, 102, 1979

1979
[76]

Sign and area in nodal geometry of Laplace eigenfunctions

F¨ edor Nazarov, Leonid Polterovich, and Mikhail Sodin. Sign and area in nodal geometry of Laplace eigenfunctions. Amer. J. Math. , 127(4):879–910, 2005

2005
[77]

Random complex zeroes and ra ndom nodal lines

Fedor Nazarov and Mikhail Sodin. Random complex zeroes and ra ndom nodal lines. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians 2010 (ICM 2 010) (In 4 Volumes) Vol. I: Plenary Lectures and Ceremonies Vols. II–IV: Invited Lectures , pages 1450–1484. World Scientiﬁc, 2010

2010
[78]

I. G. Petrowsky. Sur l’analyticit´ e des solutions des syst` emes d’´ equations diﬀ´ erentielles.Rec. Math. N. S. [Mat. Sbornik] , 5(47):3–70, 1939

1939
[79]

E.J. Remez. Sur une propri´ et´ e des polynˆ omes de Tchebyscheﬀ. Comm. Inst. Sci. Kharkow , 13:93–95, 1936

1936
[80]

Nodal sets and growth exponents of Lap lace eigenfunctions on surfaces

Guillaume Roy-Fortin. Nodal sets and growth exponents of Lap lace eigenfunctions on surfaces. Anal. PDE, 8(1):223–255, 2015

2015
[81]

On the volume of nodal sets for eigenfunctions of the Laplacian on the torus

Ze´ ev Rudnick and Igor Wigman. On the volume of nodal sets for eigenfunctions of the Laplacian on the torus. Ann. Henri Poincar´ e, 9(1):109–130, 2008. 39

2008
[82]

Christopher D. Sogge. Concerning the Lp norm of spectral clusters for second-order elliptic operators on compact manifolds. J. Funct. Anal. , 77(1):123–138, 1988

1988
[83]

Christopher D. Sogge. Hangzhou lectures on eigenfunctions of the Laplacian , volume 188 of Annals of Mathematics Studies . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2014

2014
[84]

Sogge and Steve Zelditch

Christopher D. Sogge and Steve Zelditch. Lower bounds on the Hausdorﬀ measure of nodal sets. Math. Res. Lett. , 18(1):25–37, 2011

2011
[85]

Sogge and Steve Zelditch

Christopher D. Sogge and Steve Zelditch. Lower bounds on the Hausdorﬀ measure of nodal sets II. Math. Res. Lett. , 19(6):1361–1364, 2012

2012
[86]

Harmonic analysis: real-variable methods, orthogonality , and oscillatory integrals , volume 3

Elias M Stein and Timothy S Murphy. Harmonic analysis: real-variable methods, orthogonality , and oscillatory integrals , volume 3. Princeton University Press, 1993

1993
[87]

Lower bounds on nodal sets of eigenf unctions via the heat ﬂow

Stefan Steinerberger. Lower bounds on nodal sets of eigenf unctions via the heat ﬂow. Comm. Partial Diﬀerential Equations , 39(12):2240–2261, 2014

2014
[88]

Oscillatory functions vanish on a large s et

Stefan Steinerberger. Oscillatory functions vanish on a large s et. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.05373 , 2017

2017 arXiv
[89]

Vessella

S. Vessella. Quantitative continuation from a measurable set of solutions of elliptic equations. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A , 130(4):909–923, 2000

2000
[90]

A continuous dependence result in the analytic c ontinuation problem

Sergio Vessella. A continuous dependence result in the analytic c ontinuation problem. Forum Math., 11(6):695–703, 1999

1999
[91]

Thomas H. Wolﬀ. A counterexample in a unique continuation proble m. Comm. Anal. Geom., 2(1):79– 102, 1994

1994
[92]

Problem section

Shing Tung Yau. Problem section. In Seminar on Diﬀerential Geometry , volume 102 of Ann. of Math. Stud. , pages 669–706. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J., 1982

1982
[93]

Real and complex zeros of riemannian random wa ves

Steve Zelditch. Real and complex zeros of riemannian random wa ves. Contemporary Mathematics, 14:321, 2009

2009
[94]

Park City lectures on eigenfuntions

Steve Zelditch. Park City lectures on eigenfuntions. In Geometric analysis , volume 22 of IAS/Park City Math. Ser. , pages 111–193. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2016

2016
[95]

Eigenfunctions of the Laplacian on a Riemannian manifold , volume 125 of CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics

Steve Zelditch. Eigenfunctions of the Laplacian on a Riemannian manifold , volume 125 of CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics. Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC; by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2017....

2017
[655]

Dekker, New York, 1990

1990

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [55]

A. Logunov. Nodal sets of Laplace eigenfunctions: polynomial upper estimates of the Hausdorﬀ measure. Ann. of Math. (2) , 187(1):221–239, 2018

work page 2018

[2] [56]

A. Logunov. Nodal sets of Laplace eigenfunctions: proof of N adirashvili’s conjecture and of the lower bound in Yau’s conjecture. Ann. of Math. (2) , 187(1):241–262, 2018

work page 2018

[3] [1]

https://www.math.ias.edu/ﬁles/report.pdf

Report on Workshop on Emerging Topics: Nodal sets of Eigenfun ctions, IAS, 2017. https://www.math.ias.edu/ﬁles/report.pdf. Accessed:2018-10-3 0

2017

[4] [2]

Unicit´ e et convexit´ e dans les probl` emes diﬀ´ erentiels

Shmuel Agmon. Unicit´ e et convexit´ e dans les probl` emes diﬀ´ erentiels. S´ eminaire de Math´ ematiques Sup´ erieures, No. 13 (´Et´ e, 1965). Les Presses de l’Universit´ e de Montr´ eal, Montreal,Que., 1966

1965

[5] [3]

The stability for the Cauchy problem for elliptic equations

Giovanni Alessandrini, Luca Rondi, Edi Rosset, and Sergio Vesse lla. The stability for the Cauchy problem for elliptic equations. Inverse Problems , 25(12):123004, 47, 2009

2009

[6] [4]

J. F. Almgren Jr. Dirichlet’s problem for multiple valued functions an d the regularity of mass min- imizing integral currents. In Minimal submanifolds and geodesics (Proc. Japan-United St ates Sem., Tokyo, 1977) , pages 1–6. North-Holland, Amsterdam-New York, 1979

1977

[7] [5]

Aronszajn

N. Aronszajn. A unique continuation theorem for solutions of ellip tic partial diﬀerential equations or inequalities of second order. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) , 36:235–249, 1957

1957

[8] [6]

Elliptic Partial Diﬀerential Equations and Qua- siconformal Mappings in the Plane (PMS-48)

Kari Astala, Tadeusz Iwaniec, and Gaven Martin. Elliptic Partial Diﬀerential Equations and Qua- siconformal Mappings in the Plane (PMS-48) . Princeton University Press, 2009

2009