pith. sign in

arxiv: 1003.4865 · v4 · pith:3HFF2KZ6new · submitted 2010-03-25 · 🧮 math.CO · cs.CC· cs.LO· math.LO

Logical complexity of graphs: a survey

classification 🧮 math.CO cs.CCcs.LOmath.LO
keywords graphlogicalsentencecomplexitydefiningdepthdiscussgraphs
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:3HFF2KZ6 Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{3HFF2KZ6}

Prints a linked pith:3HFF2KZ6 badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

We discuss the definability of finite graphs in first-order logic with two relation symbols for adjacency and equality of vertices. The logical depth $D(G)$ of a graph $G$ is equal to the minimum quantifier depth of a sentence defining $G$ up to isomorphism. The logical width $W(G)$ is the minimum number of variables occurring in such a sentence. The logical length $L(G)$ is the length of a shortest defining sentence. We survey known estimates for these graph parameters and discuss their relations to other topics (such as the efficiency of the Weisfeiler-Lehman algorithm in isomorphism testing, the evolution of a random graph, quantitative characteristics of the zero-one law, or the contribution of Frank Ramsey to the research on Hilbert's Entscheidungsproblem). Also, we trace the behavior of the descriptive complexity of a graph as the logic becomes more restrictive (for example, only definitions with a bounded number of variables or quantifier alternations are allowed) or more expressible (after powering with counting quantifiers).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.