On 3-manifolds with pointwise pinched nonnegative Ricci curvature

John Lott

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 28 references

On 3-manifolds with pointwise pinched nonnegative Ricci curvature

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A complete 3-manifold with bounded nonnegative pointwise c-pinched Ricci curvature is flat or compact when negative sectional curvature decays quadratically.

desk verdict Genuine progress on Hamilton's pinching conjecture, but the headline theorem's proof depends on an unpublished local extension of Lebedeva–Petrunin, so the paper is conditional as it stands. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04715 v3 pith:3IMXTPPB submitted 2019-08-13 math.DG

John Lott This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DG MSC 53C2053C2153C2353E20

keywords 3-manifoldspointwisepinchedRiccicurvaturenonnegativeflowcubicvolumegrowthAlexandrovspacesweakconvergenceofoperatorstangentconeatinfinity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper addresses a standing conjecture in three-dimensional Riemannian geometry: a complete 3-manifold with bounded sectional curvature, nonnegative Ricci curvature, and pointwise pinching of the Ricci eigenvalues should be either flat or compact. The paper proves this under an additional decay condition: from any basepoint $m_0$, the negative part of the sectional curvature may not drop below $-A/d(m,m_0)^2$. If the theorem is right, the only noncompact manifolds in this class are flat, and the whole conjecture is reduced to the case where negative curvature decays slower than quadratically. The proof is carried by the Ricci flow, which is shown to exist forever and to be type-III, and the noncompact alternative is eliminated by showing that the tangent cone at infinity must be flat $\mathbb{R}^3$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism for Theorem 1.4 is the weak convergence of curvature operators for smoothable Alexandrov spaces, taken from unpublished research announcement [17]. On the rescaled pointed manifolds satisfying only a lower sectional-curvature bound, this machinery provides intrinsic measures $r_{X_\infty}$ and $R_{X_\infty}$ on the limiting cone $X_\infty$, together with the formulas $r_{X_\infty}(f)=(\partial_r f)^2\, dr\wedge(d\omega_Y-d\operatorname{vol}_Y)$ and $R_{X_\infty}=2\,dr\wedge(d\omega_Y-d\operatorname{vol}_Y)$, where $d\omega_Y$ is the curvature measure of the link surface $Y$. The $c$-Ricci pinching inequality, applied through these measures, forces $R_{X_\infty}=0$; then the link equation $d\omega_Y=d\operatorname{vol}_Y$ implies $Y$ is a round $S^2$, so $X_\infty$ is flat $\mathbb{R}^3$.

What would settle it

Exhibit one complete noncompact 3-manifold with bounded sectional curvature, nonnegative and $c$-pinched Ricci curvature, and $K(m)\ge -A/d(m,m_0)^2$ that is not flat; the theorem says none exists. A practical place to look is the warped-product family $ds^2=dr^2+f(r)^2d\theta^2+g(r)^2d\phi^2$ on $\mathbb{R}^3$ with exactly quadratic negative curvature at infinity, where the paper's prediction is that every such metric either is flat or violates the pinching.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, Theorem 1.4, is that Conjecture 1.1 holds whenever there is $A<\infty$ with sectional curvatures satisfying $K(m)\ge -A/d(m,m_0)^2$. In the positive-Ricci, noncompact case the paper derives a contradiction: rescaling the metric around $m_0$ produces a pointed Gromov-Hausdorff limit that is a three-dimensional Alexandrov cone $X_\infty=\operatorname{cone}(Y)$, whose link $Y$ is an Alexandrov surface. Using weak convergence of curvature operators on the rescaled metrics, the paper computes the limiting scalar-curvature measure on the cone and shows that the $c$-Ricci pinching forces it to vanish; this gives $d\omega_Y=d\operatorname{vol}_Y$ on the link, which forces $Y$ to be a round $S^2$ and $X_\infty$ to be flat $\mathbb{R}^3$. A volume-convergence rigidity result then implies the original metric is flat, contradicting positive Ricci curvature. Thus, under the stated decay assumption, flatness and compactness exhaust the possibilities.

Load-bearing premise

The proof of Theorem 1.4 leans on the unpublished research announcement [17], which must supply a valid and locally applicable theory of weak limits of curvature operators on smoothable Alexandrov spaces; if that theory is incomplete or does not apply to the cone $X_\infty$, the contradiction in Proposition 6.4 collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Under the hypotheses of Theorem 1.4, a noncompact example with positive Ricci curvature cannot exist; the noncompact case is flat, so the dichotomy is really "flat or closed."
For any manifold satisfying the conjecture hypotheses, the Ricci flow $(M,g(t))$ exists for all $t\ge 0$ and has the type-III bound $\|\operatorname{Rm}(g(t))\|_\infty\le C/t$.
The initial metric has cubic volume growth, and in the nonnegative sectional curvature case the blowdown limit is an expanding gradient soliton, which is then shown to be flat $\mathbb{R}^3$.
If the conjecture fails, it must fail through a metric whose negative sectional curvature decays more slowly than $1/d(m,m_0)^2$.
The blowdown limit is a three-dimensional manifold rather than a collapsed one-dimensional or two-dimensional space, so collapsing is ruled out at large time.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the weak-convergence results in [17] become fully available, the same cone computation is a natural template for attacking the full conjecture; the current proof would upgrade from a conditional theorem to the unconditional dichotomy.
The argument suggests a higher-dimensional analog would conclude "Ricci-flat or compact" rather than "flat or compact," because on a cone the radial Ricci curvature vanishes and $c$-pinching would force the link to be Einstein but not necessarily round; this is an extension the paper does not make.
A direct test of the mechanism is to search within warped-product metrics $ds^2=dr^2+f(r)^2d\theta^2+g(r)^2d\phi^2$ on $\mathbb{R}^3$ for a nonflat example with $c$-pinched Ricci and $K(m)\ge -A/d(m,m_0)^2$; the theorem predicts none exists, so finding one would pinpoint the breakdown of the curvature-measure step.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear colleague,

Quick take: this is a real advance on Hamilton's pointwise pinching conjecture, and the main new theorem is probably true—but as written it is conditional on an unpublished research announcement, and the referee should scrutinize that dependency.

What is genuinely new: Theorem 1.3(b), the conjecture under quadratic curvature decay, is proved using published tools and does not rely on [17]. That alone is worth having. Proposition 1.5 (long-time type-III existence), Proposition 1.6 (three-dimensional blowdown), Corollary 1.7 (cubic volume growth), and the Alexandrov-space analysis are substantial. The paper is careful to attribute Theorem 1.3(a) to Chen–Zhu and flags its use of [17] in the introduction. No circularity; the self-citations are to established techniques.

The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test points. The proof of Theorem 1.4 needs [17]'s weak convergence of curvature operators for a pointed noncompact sequence converging to a noncompact cone, with curvature bounded below only on compact sets. The text says the constructions 'can also be carried out locally,' but that extension is not proved, and it is load-bearing: the measures r_X∞, R_X∞, and identities (6.6)–(6.7) depend on it. I would also ask the referee to check the step from weak convergence to (6.18); the paper presents it as immediate from (6.11), but it is terse enough that I want confirmation that the local machinery really gives that limit. These are not fatal objections, but they are unstated dependencies. If [17] appears or the author supplies a proof of the needed extension, the theorem should stand.

The topological lemmas in Section 3 are imported from published work with sketches. I did not find a gap, but a referee should check Lemma 3.2 and Lemma 3.4 closely.

Bottom line: send it to a serious referee. The weaker Theorem 1.3(b) may be acceptable even if Theorem 1.4 must wait for the [17] issue to be resolved. This is honest, expert work—not a case for desk rejection.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies Hamilton's conjecture that a complete connected 3-manifold with bounded sectional curvature, nonnegative Ricci curvature, and pointwise c-Ricci pinching must be flat or compact. The main result, Theorem 1.4, proves the conjecture under the additional hypothesis that the sectional curvature satisfies K(m) ≥ -A/d(m,m0)^2 for some basepoint m0. The proof uses Ricci flow: long-time existence and a type-III curvature bound (Propositions 1.5 and 2.13), a noncollapsing blowdown limit (Proposition 3.1), cubic volume growth (Corollary 1.7), and finally a spatial rescaling argument that employs weak convergence of curvature operators from the unpublished research announcement [17] by Lebedeva and Petrunin. The paper also proves the conjecture when the manifold has nonnegative sectional curvature or quadratic curvature decay (Theorem 1.3), using a different argument.

Significance. If correct, Theorem 1.4 establishes a long-standing conjecture in a nontrivial special case, and the paper's technical machinery, including the long-time existence and blowdown results, is likely to be useful for the full conjecture. The proofs of Propositions 1.5, 2.13, and 3.1 are detailed and appear to be sound, and the use of collapsing theory and Ricci flow compactness is appropriate. However, the proof of Theorem 1.4 depends on an unpublished result that, as stated, does not cover the noncompact, non-uniformly-curvature-bounded situation needed here, making the paper's headline theorem conditional.

major comments (2)

[Section 6, Proposition 6.4] The proof applies the weak convergence result of [17] to the noncompact pointed sequence (M, α_i^{-2} g_0, m_0) converging to a noncompact cone X∞, whose curvature lower bound is -A/d(x,x∞)^2 and hence not uniform globally. The recalled statement of [17] in Section 6 requires compact manifolds with uniformly bounded sectional curvature below converging to a compact Alexandrov space. The sentence 'The preceding constructions can also be carried out locally' is asserted without proof, but the subsequent identities (6.6), (6.7), and the limit in (6.18) all rely on this local extension. If the local extension is not part of [17], then the measures r_X∞ and R_X∞ are not known to exist, and the contradiction argument in Proposition 6.4 is unsupported. This is a load-bearing gap for the main theorem.
[Introduction and Abstract] Theorem 1.4 is stated unconditionally, but its proof depends on the unpublished research announcement [17] and, further, on an unproved local/noncompact extension of [17]'s main theorem. The introduction honestly notes the use of [17], but the abstract and theorem statement should explicitly state that the result is conditional on [17] and on the local extension, or the author should supply the missing proof.

minor comments (3)

[Section 6, after (6.10)] There is a minor typo in the display after (6.10): the second equality uses 'K' instead of 'K_s'.
[References] The reference [17] is given only by a URL and is described as a research announcement; it is not a published paper. The text should clarify its status and, ideally, provide a more permanent reference or a statement of which parts of the announcement are being used.
[Section 3.2, end of proof of Proposition 3.1] The argument that the iterated fibrations yield a Seifert fibration of R3, leading to a contradiction by citing [28, p. 216-217], is terse; a brief explanation of why the cited result applies would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the derivation is self-contained relative to cited external results, and the unpublished dependency on [17] is a completeness risk, not a circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Theorem 1.4, is derived from prior quantitative results rather than assumed. The proof chain is: Proposition 1.5 establishes long-time existence and type-III curvature decay using Hamilton-style maximum-principle arguments; Proposition 3.1 rules out collapse using external collapse-theory results [2, 10, 18]; Corollary 1.7 gives cubic volume growth from distance-distortion estimates in [15, 16]; Proposition 6.4 then rescales the metric and invokes the weak convergence machinery of [17] to identify the limiting measures r_Xinfinity and R_Xinfinity. None of these steps assumes Conjecture 1.1 or redefines the conclusion as an input. The self-citations [15, 16, 18] are technical tools with independent published content: [18] supplies the etale groupoid limit construction in Proposition 2.1, and [15, 16] supply distance-distortion and collapsed 3-manifold facts. They do not import the target theorem. The main weakness flagged in the paper is that Theorem 1.4 relies on the unpublished research announcement [17], specifically on a local/noncompact extension of its weak convergence theorem that the paper asserts without proof in Section 6. This makes the proof conditional and a verification risk, but it is not circular in the sense of a fitted quantity being renamed a prediction or a stated input being equivalent to the output. The equations (6.6) and (6.7) are computed from the cone model, not imposed as the desired conclusion, and the contradiction argument uses independent rigidity results [8, 22, 23]. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity, with the caveat that the theorem's validity as a fully established result depends on the correctness and applicability of [17].

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 10 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is pure mathematics and contains no fitted parameters and no invented physical entities. The constants c, A, and C are hypotheses or bounds. The load-bearing external inputs are standard Ricci flow, Alexandrov-geometry, and collapsing results, plus the unpublished weak-convergence announcement [17]. The main risk to the ledger is the last item.

assumptions (10)

standard math Ricci flow short-time existence and uniqueness for complete metrics with bounded curvature.
Invoked at the start of Section 2 to define the maximal flow g(t) from g0.
standard math The weak maximum principle preserves nonnegative Ricci curvature and c-Ricci pinching along Ricci flow; the strong maximum principle upgrades to positive Ricci for t>0 if the initial metric is nonflat.
Used in Section 2 to reduce Conjecture 1.1 to Conjecture 1.2 and to justify the pinching estimates (2.2) through (2.9).
standard math Hamilton's type-I blowup analysis and the Cheeger-Hamilton compactness theorem for Ricci flows with bounded curvature.
Used in Propositions 2.1 and 2.13 to rule out curvature blowup and prove the type-III bound.
standard math Cheeger-Fukaya-Gromov theory of collapsed manifolds with bounded sectional curvature, including nilpotent Killing structures and singular fibrations.
Used in Lemmas 3.4 and 3.7 to describe one- and two-dimensional Gromov-Hausdorff limits and prove noncollapsing of the blowdown.
standard math Perelman stability theorem for Alexandrov spaces with curvature bounded below.
Used in Section 6 to conclude that the link Y of the cone is a 2-sphere after showing its Euler characteristic is positive.
standard math Colding's stability theorem: a complete manifold with Ric>=0 whose tangent cone at infinity is Euclidean R^3 is isometric to R^3.
Used in Propositions 5.1, 5.3 and 6.4 to contradict nonflatness once the tangent cone at infinity is identified with R^3.
standard math Schoen-Yau theorem: a complete noncompact 3-manifold with positive Ricci curvature is diffeomorphic to R^3.
Cited in Section 2 to justify M is diffeomorphic to R^3 and hence orientable, which is used in Lemma 3.4 and Lemma 4.6.
domain assumption The rescaled sequence (M, alpha_i^{-2} g0, m0) admits a pointed Gromov-Hausdorff limit that is a metric cone X_infinity over a connected Alexandrov surface with curvature bounded below by -A.
Assumed in Section 6; it follows from the quadratic lower curvature bound and noncollapsing, but the compactness and regularity of the limit are not proved in the paper.
standard math The link of the cone is a connected Alexandrov surface whose underlying topological space is a 2-manifold without boundary admitting a smooth structure, with a canonical smoothing by Richard [23].
Used in Section 6 to set up the computation of curvature measures on the link.
domain assumption The weak convergence of curvature operators for smoothable Alexandrov spaces from the unpublished research announcement [17], including formulas (6.6) and (6.7) for r_X_infinity and R_X_infinity.
This is the main external black box for Theorem 1.4; the paper explicitly relies on it but does not prove or provide a verifiable version.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On 3-manifolds with pointwise pinched nonnegative Ricci curvature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3IMXTPPB

@misc{pith2026190804715,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On 3-manifolds with pointwise pinched nonnegative Ricci curvature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3IMXTPPB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04715}
}

read the original abstract

There is a conjecture that a complete Riemannian 3-manifold with bounded sectional curvature, and pointwise pinched nonnegative Ricci curvature, must be flat or compact. We show that this is true when the negative part (if any) of the sectional curvature decays quadratically.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

[17]

Curvature tensor of smootha ble Alexandrov spaces

N. Lebedeva and A. Petrunin, “Curvature tensor of smootha ble Alexandrov spaces”, Research announcement, https://www.researchgate.net/project/Curv ature-tensor-of-smoothable-Alexandrov- spaces (2019)

work page 2019
[1]

Ancient solutions to th e Ricci ﬂow with pinched curvature

S. Brendle, G. Huisken and C. Sinestrari, “Ancient solutions to th e Ricci ﬂow with pinched curvature”, Duke Math. J. 158, p. 537-551 (2011)

work page 2011
[2]

Nilpotent structures a nd invariant metrics on collapsed manifolds

J. Cheeger, K. Fukaya and M. Gromov, “Nilpotent structures a nd invariant metrics on collapsed manifolds”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 5, p. 327-372 (1992) (1992)

work page 1992
[3]

On the characteristic numbers of c omplete manifolds of bounded curva- ture and ﬁnite volume

J. Cheeger and M. Gromov, “On the characteristic numbers of c omplete manifolds of bounded curva- ture and ﬁnite volume”, in Diﬀerential Geometry and Complex Analysis , Springer, Berlin, pp. 115-154 (1985) 18 JOHN LOTT

work page 1985
[4]

Collapsing Riemannian manifolds while ke eping their curvature bounded II

J. Cheeger and M. Gromov, “Collapsing Riemannian manifolds while ke eping their curvature bounded II” J. Diﬀ. Geom. 32, p. 269-298 (1990)

work page 1990
[5]

Curvature and injectivity radius estima tes for Einstein 4-manifolds

J. Cheeger and G. Tian, “Curvature and injectivity radius estima tes for Einstein 4-manifolds”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 19, p. 487-525 (2005)

work page 2005
[6]

Complete Riemannian manifolds with point wise pinched curvature

B.-L. Chen and X.-P. Zhu, “Complete Riemannian manifolds with point wise pinched curvature”, Inv. Math. 140, p. 423-452 (2000)

work page 2000
[7]

B. Chow, P. Lu and L. Ni, Hamilton’s Ricci ﬂow , Amer. Math. Soc., Providence (2006)

work page 2006

Show all 28 references

[8]

Ricci curvature and volume convergence

T. Colding, “Ricci curvature and volume convergence”, Ann. Ma th 145, p. 477-501 (1997)

1997
[9]

Smoothing out positively curved metric cones by Ricc i expanders

A. Deruelle, “Smoothing out positively curved metric cones by Ricc i expanders”, Geom. and Funct. Anal. 26, p. 188-249 (2016)

2016
[10]

Hausdorﬀ convergence of Riemannian manifolds an d its applications

K. Fukaya, “Hausdorﬀ convergence of Riemannian manifolds an d its applications”, in Recent Topics in Diﬀerential and Analytic Geometry , ed. T. Ochiai, Math. Soc. of Japan, Tokyo, p. 143-238 (1990)

1990
[11]

Three-manifolds with positive Ricci curvature

R. Hamilton, “Three-manifolds with positive Ricci curvature”, J . Diﬀ. Geom. 17, p. 255-306 (1982)

1982
[12]

Convex hypersurfaces with pinched second fund amental form

R. Hamilton, “Convex hypersurfaces with pinched second fund amental form”, Comm. Anal. Geom. 2, p. 167-172 (1994)

1994
[13]

The formation of singularities in the Ricci ﬂow

R. Hamilton, “The formation of singularities in the Ricci ﬂow”, in Su rveys in Diﬀerential Geometry 2, International Press, Boston, p. 7-136 (1995)

1995
[14]

Ricci ﬂow on Riemannian groupoids

C. Hilaire, “Ricci ﬂow on Riemannian groupoids”, preprint, https ://arxiv.org/abs/1411.6058 (2014)

2014 arXiv
[15]

Notes on Perelman’s papers

B. Kleiner and J. Lott, “Notes on Perelman’s papers”, Geom. To p. 12, p. 2587-2855 (2008)

2008
[16]

Locally collapsed 3-manifolds

B. Kleiner and J. Lott, “Locally collapsed 3-manifolds”, Ast´ eris que 365, p. 7-99 (2014)

2014
[18]

On the long-time behavior of type-III Ricci ﬂow solut ions

J. Lott, “On the long-time behavior of type-III Ricci ﬂow solut ions”, Math. Annalen 339, p. 627-666 (2007)

2007
[19]

Ricci ﬂow on quasiprojective manifolds I I

J. Lott and Z. Zhang, “Ricci ﬂow on quasiprojective manifolds I I”, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 18, p. 1813-1854 (2016)

2016
[20]

A local curvature bound in Ricci ﬂow

P. Lu, “A local curvature bound in Ricci ﬂow”, Geom. Top. 14, p . 1095-1110 (2010)

2010
[21]

Ancient solutions to K¨ ahler-Ricci ﬂow

L. Ni, “Ancient solutions to K¨ ahler-Ricci ﬂow”, Math. Res. Let t. 12, p. 633654 (2005)

2005
[22]

Two-dimensional manifolds of bounded curva ture

Y. Reshetnyak, “Two-dimensional manifolds of bounded curva ture”, in Geometry IV , Springer-Verlag, New York (1993)

1993
[23]

Canonical smoothing of compact Alexandrov surf aces

T. Richard, “Canonical smoothing of compact Alexandrov surf aces”, Ann. Sci. ENS 51, p. 263-279 (2018)

2018
[24]

Complete three dimensional manifolds with positive Ricci curvature and scalar curvature

R. Schoen and S.-T. Yau, “Complete three dimensional manifolds with positive Ricci curvature and scalar curvature”, in Seminar on Diﬀerential Geometry , ed. S.-T. Yau, Annals of Math. Studies 102, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1982)

1982
[25]

Expanding solitons with non-negative c urvature operator coming out of cones

F. Schulze and M. Simon, “Expanding solitons with non-negative c urvature operator coming out of cones”, Math. Z. 275, p. 625639 (2013)

2013
[26]

Stability of Euclidean sp ace under Ricci-ﬂow

O. Schn¨ urer, F. Schulze and M. Simon, “Stability of Euclidean sp ace under Ricci-ﬂow”, Comm. Anal. Geom. 16, p. 127-158 (2008)

2008
[27]

The geometries of 3-manifolds

P. Scott, “The geometries of 3-manifolds”, Bull. London Math. Soc. 15, p. 401-487 (1983)

1983
[28]

A foliation of R3 and other punctured 3-manifolds by circles

E. Vogt, “A foliation of R3 and other punctured 3-manifolds by circles”, Publ. Math. IHES 69, p. 215-232 (1989) Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berk eley, Berkeley, CA 94720- 3840, USA E-mail address : lott@berkeley.edu

1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [17]

Curvature tensor of smootha ble Alexandrov spaces

N. Lebedeva and A. Petrunin, “Curvature tensor of smootha ble Alexandrov spaces”, Research announcement, https://www.researchgate.net/project/Curv ature-tensor-of-smoothable-Alexandrov- spaces (2019)

work page 2019

[2] [1]

Ancient solutions to th e Ricci ﬂow with pinched curvature

S. Brendle, G. Huisken and C. Sinestrari, “Ancient solutions to th e Ricci ﬂow with pinched curvature”, Duke Math. J. 158, p. 537-551 (2011)

work page 2011

[3] [2]

Nilpotent structures a nd invariant metrics on collapsed manifolds

J. Cheeger, K. Fukaya and M. Gromov, “Nilpotent structures a nd invariant metrics on collapsed manifolds”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 5, p. 327-372 (1992) (1992)

work page 1992

[4] [3]

On the characteristic numbers of c omplete manifolds of bounded curva- ture and ﬁnite volume

J. Cheeger and M. Gromov, “On the characteristic numbers of c omplete manifolds of bounded curva- ture and ﬁnite volume”, in Diﬀerential Geometry and Complex Analysis , Springer, Berlin, pp. 115-154 (1985) 18 JOHN LOTT

work page 1985

[5] [4]

Collapsing Riemannian manifolds while ke eping their curvature bounded II

J. Cheeger and M. Gromov, “Collapsing Riemannian manifolds while ke eping their curvature bounded II” J. Diﬀ. Geom. 32, p. 269-298 (1990)

work page 1990

[6] [5]

Curvature and injectivity radius estima tes for Einstein 4-manifolds

J. Cheeger and G. Tian, “Curvature and injectivity radius estima tes for Einstein 4-manifolds”, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 19, p. 487-525 (2005)

work page 2005

[7] [6]

Complete Riemannian manifolds with point wise pinched curvature

B.-L. Chen and X.-P. Zhu, “Complete Riemannian manifolds with point wise pinched curvature”, Inv. Math. 140, p. 423-452 (2000)

work page 2000

[8] [7]

B. Chow, P. Lu and L. Ni, Hamilton’s Ricci ﬂow , Amer. Math. Soc., Providence (2006)

work page 2006