Extending Xenakis: From Architectural Geometry to Sonification of the Philips Pavilion

Alexandria Smith; Canting Zhu; Changda Ma; Sunshiyu Wang

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 27 references

Extending Xenakis: From Architectural Geometry to Sonification of the Philips Pavilion

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The completed Philips Pavilion can be turned into a temporal score by mapping its ruled-surface lines and sample points into string glissandi, density-based energy blocks, and sparse brass events—inverting the historical music-to-architectu

desk verdict A coherent, reproducible inversion of the Metastaseis–Pavilion lineage into MIDI + synced 3D viz; free parameters and uniform sampling limit how far the “extends Xenakis” claim can go. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06589 v1 pith:3JDTCJTZ submitted 2026-07-06 cs.SD

Changda Ma , Sunshiyu Wang , Canting Zhu , Alexandria Smith This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.SD

keywords architecturalsonificationPhilipsPavilionruledsurfacesstringglissandigenerativeMIDImusicandarchitectureenergyblocksreal-timevisualization

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that finished architectural geometry can generate music, not only house it. The authors reverse the classic route that took continuous string glissandi and built the Philips Pavilion’s ruled surfaces: they reconstruct the Pavilion as nine ruled surfaces, extract the governing lines, subdivide each surface into structural lines and spatial samples, and feed that geometry into a multi-layer composition. Four evenly spaced lines per surface become continuous string glissandi; vertical point density becomes five synchronized energy blocks of relative stasis; a thinned subset of points becomes sparse brass and woodwind events. The pipeline is deterministic Python-to-MIDI, paired with a real-time 3D visualization that lights the same lines and points as they sound. A sympathetic reader cares because the work reframes architecture as a performable control structure—motion, hold, and structural contrast made audible—rather than a static endpoint of musical thinking.

What carries the argument

The inverted ruled-surface pipeline: recover the two governing ruling curves of each surface, subdivide into structural lines and evenly sampled points, then map line length and vertical displacement to glissando duration and continuous pitch bend, vertical point counts to block durations, and a reduced point subset to quantized discrete onsets—keeping line continuity and point discreteness as distinct musical layers.

What would settle it

Re-run the same Pavilion geometry with curvature-adaptive sampling or different numbers of glissando lines and density bins, then test whether listeners and designers still identify the large-scale motion, stasis, and structural contrast as coming from the building; if that recognition collapses, the inversion claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By reconstructing the Philips Pavilion as nine ruled surfaces, recovering their governing ruling lines, subdividing into structural lines and 3,357 spatial samples, and mapping four evenly spaced lines per surface to continuous string glissandi while organizing point density into five vertical energy blocks and a sparse brass/woodwind layer, the completed architecture can be sonified as a temporal composition that inverts the original music-to-architecture workflow and renders architectural motion, stasis, and contrast as performable MIDI with synchronized visualization.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on uniform line and point sampling, fixed vertical density bins, and hand-chosen duration bounds still carrying enough of the Pavilion’s geometric structure for the score to count as a true inversion rather than an arbitrary aesthetic mapping.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Finished architectural form can be treated as a structured generative dataset for music, not only as a container for sound.
Ruled-line continuity and point discreteness can be preserved as separate musical layers—sustained motion versus event articulation.
The same extraction supports synchronized audiovisual performance that makes architectural structure legible through time.
Designers can inspect structural logic and rhythmic relationships at the auditory level, beyond purely visual inspection.
The method points toward interactive and immersive systems in which navigating the space also drives the sonification.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same line-and-point pipeline could be applied to other ruled or freeform buildings to test whether the inversion remains musically legible outside this one Pavilion.
Adaptive sampling that densifies near high curvature would be a direct experiment to restore local geometric features that uniform grids flatten.
Exposing temporal bounds and density bins as live controls would turn the deterministic MIDI render into a performance instrument rather than a fixed playback.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a clean creative-systems paper that actually ships the thing it claims: reconstruct the Philips Pavilion as nine ruled surfaces, pull governing lines and 3,357 points, map four evenly spaced lines per surface to continuous string glissandi, density strata to five energy blocks, and a thinned point set to sparse brass/woodwind events, then render MIDI in Ableton with a synchronized matplotlib visualization. Code and video are linked. That end-to-end inversion of the documented Metastaseis→Pavilion workflow is the real new result; prior cited work (Parthenios facades, Torresan vibration data) does not do this specific lineage or dual continuous/discrete layering.

What works: the geometry pipeline is coherent (Eqs. 1–2, Rhino/Grasshopper reconstruction, 20 interpolants then 4 selected lines), the continuous-vs-discrete distinction is musically sensible, instrumentation is historically motivated, and the system is deterministic and implementable. Circularity is low—mappings are design rules, not fitted predictions. For computational music, digital heritage, and interactive architecture, this is a usable design pattern, not vapor.

Soft spots, in proportion: free parameters (γ, Tmin/Tmax, exactly four lines, five equal-width bins, G-major grid, one-second rest, probabilistic thinning) dominate the musical outcome, and there is no perceptual evaluation or comparison against Metastaseis. The authors themselves note that fixed-density sampling weakens local curvature; that undercuts the stronger claim that the score “extends Xenakis’s structural thinking” rather than sonifies the form with historically flavored instruments. The stress-test is right that structural fidelity is asserted more than demonstrated, but wrong if it implies the paper is empty—the implementable pipeline and historical specificity still stand as a concrete contribution.

Who it’s for: people who build or teach architecture–music systems, not theorists looking for a new formal framework. Math and citations look solid for the genre; no invented theory, just standard ruled-surface math plus a clear system. I would send it to peer review as a systems/demo paper with the expectation that referees will demand fuller parameter disclosure, less uniform sampling discussion, and tempered claims. Worth engaging if you care about this niche; not a field-reorganizing result.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper inverts Xenakis’s historical Metastaseis-to-Philips-Pavilion workflow by treating the completed Pavilion as a generative musical source. The authors reconstruct the Pavilion as nine ruled surfaces (Eqs. 1–2), extract governing ruling lines, interpolate 20 structural lines per surface, and map four evenly spaced lines per surface (36 total) to continuous string glissandi via length-to-duration shaping (Eqs. 3–4) and vertical displacement to pitch bend. From 3,357 spatial samples they form five vertical density-based “energy blocks” for string tremolo stasis and a thinned brass/woodwind event layer (G-major quantization, x-to-onset, y-modulated density). A deterministic Python pipeline emits MIDI for Ableton Live, synchronized with a matplotlib 3D visualization of glissandi, blocks, and discrete events. The claim is that this renders architectural motion, stasis, and contrast as a performable inversion that extends Xenakis’s architectural–musical thinking into sonification and interactive practice.

Significance. If the inversion is accepted as structurally meaningful rather than merely aesthetic, the work offers a concrete, reproducible bridge from parametric architectural geometry to multi-layer MIDI and synchronized visualization—an under-explored direction relative to facade or vibration sonification. Strengths that should be credited include: a fully deterministic, documented mapping pipeline; public code; a public real-time visualization video; and an explicit historical framing that reuses Metastaseis-associated instrumentation and ruled-surface logic rather than an ad-hoc instrument set. The contribution is primarily systems/design: it demonstrates implementability of architecture-as-score. Its lasting value for the field depends on whether the geometric choices preserve enough of the Pavilion’s ruled-surface structure to justify the “extending Xenakis” claim, and on whether the resulting piece can be evaluated as music or as structural sonification rather than only as a demo.

major comments (3)

[Abstract, §1, §3.4, §4] The central claim that the system “extends Xenakis’s architectural and musical thinking” (Abstract, §1, §4) is under-supported by evaluation. Sections 3.3–3.5 describe a coherent deterministic pipeline and audiovisual demo, but the manuscript provides no comparison of the resulting form to Metastaseis (e.g., glissando density, convergence patterns, sectional proportions), no ablation of the free mapping choices, and no listening or expert evaluation of whether motion/stasis/contrast are perceptually recovered. Without at least one of these, the work shows that the Pavilion can be sonified with Xenakis-associated instruments, not that the sonification is a structural inversion of his generative logic. A major revision should either add such evidence or substantially soften the interpretive claim to a systems demonstration of architecture-to-MIDI mapping.
[§3.3–3.4, Eqs. 3–4, §4] Uniform fixed-density sampling and several free parameters are load-bearing for the fidelity claim, yet are only weakly justified. §3.3 chooses 20 interpolated lines, four evenly spaced glissando lines, 20 points per line, and five equal-width vertical bins; Eqs. 3–4 introduce γ>1 and free T_min/T_max; brass/woodwind use G-major quantization, a fixed rhythmic grid, and probabilistic thinning. The authors themselves state in §4 that fixed-density lines and points “struggle to capture local curvature variations, which can weaken and simplify certain geometric features.” Those curvature features are precisely the hyperbolic-paraboloid trajectories Xenakis treated as shared structural units. The manuscript should either (i) motivate or sensitivity-test these choices against geometric or historical criteria, or (ii) reframe the result as an aesthetic, reproducible mapping rather than a preser
[§3.4.1] The “five density-based energy blocks” (§3.4.1) are presented as the architectural counterpart of post-glissando stasis, with local point count as a proxy for block duration. This construct is not derived from Metastaseis or from the ruled-surface formula (Eq. 1); it is an invented organizational layer. That is legitimate as design, but the paper repeatedly treats density→energy/stasis as if it inherits Xenakis’s logic. Clarify that this is an authorial mapping axiom, justify why equal-width vertical strata (rather than surface-wise, curvature-weighted, or historically motivated partitions) are appropriate, and state how block durations would change under alternative binning so readers can assess robustness.

minor comments (6)

[§3.1] §3.1: “family of geriatrics sweeping along a directrix” is almost certainly a mistranslation/typo for “generatrices.” Correct throughout.
[§3.3] Point count consistency: 9 surfaces × 20 structural lines × 20 points = 3,600, but the text reports 3,357 sampled points (§3.3, Abstract). Briefly explain the discrepancy (shared edges, culled duplicates, incomplete surfaces, etc.).
[§3.4.2, Eq. 5] Eq. 5 uses y_norm for onset beats, while the prose in §3.4.2 assigns onset primarily to x_i and density/distribution to y_i. Align equation and text so the spatial-to-time mapping is unambiguous.
[§3.5, Figs. 5–7] Figure references: the brass/woodwind discrete triggers are said to appear in both Figure 7 and Figure 5; ensure captions distinguish glissando phase, block phase, and event layer clearly for readers who cannot access the video.
[§3.4] Report the concrete numerical values used for γ, T_min, T_max, rest duration, grid size, and brass downsampling probability (even if only in a short parameter table or appendix) so the MIDI is fully reproducible from the paper alone, not only from the repository.
[Abstract] Minor wording: Abstract “3357” vs body “3,357”; “In general, this work paves the way” is vague for a closing abstract sentence—prefer a concrete contribution statement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: geometry-to-MIDI mappings are explicit design rules, not fitted predictions or self-referential derivations.

full rationale

The paper describes a constructive sonification pipeline (ruled-surface extraction via the standard parametric formula and its boundary recovery, uniform line/point sampling, length-to-duration shaping with free γ and T bounds, z-to-pitch, density-to-block duration, x-to-onset) that produces MIDI and a synchronized visualization by construction. These steps are stipulated algorithmic choices that invert Xenakis’s historical workflow by design; they do not claim an independent first-principles prediction, uniqueness theorem, or empirical fit that is then re-presented as a result. There are no self-citations, no parameters fitted to a target musical outcome and then “predicted,” and no renaming of a known result. Free parameters and uniform sampling are acknowledged limitations of fidelity (Section 4), not circular reductions. The work is therefore self-contained as a system description; score 0 is the correct non-finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

This is a design/system paper. Load-bearing content is mostly standard ruled-surface geometry plus author-chosen sonification mappings and free temporal/density parameters. No new physical entities are postulated. The scientific weight of the central claim rests on whether those design axioms are accepted as a faithful inversion of Xenakis rather than on fitted empirical constants.

free parameters (7)

gamma (nonlinear length shaper)
Eq. 3 uses γ>1 to bias glissando durations toward shorter values; value is author-chosen, not derived from geometry or listening tests.
T_min and T_max glissando duration bounds
Eq. 4 maps normalized lengths into a hand-set temporal range that directly controls musical pacing.
lines_per_surface = 4 (from 20 interpolated lines)
Choice of four evenly spaced structural lines per surface sets ensemble size (36 voices) and which geometric trajectories are heard.
sampling density (20 points per structural line; 3357 total)
Fixed sampling density determines energy-block statistics and brass event pool; authors note it under-resolves local curvature.
five equal-width vertical energy blocks
Number and equal-width binning of stasis blocks is a free organizational choice mapped linearly to durations.
brass/woodwind pitch set and rhythmic grid (G major; fixed grid quantization)
Discretization to G major and beat grid, plus probabilistic rest-period downsampling, are aesthetic controls not forced by the Pavilion geometry.
one-second rest between glissando and block sections
Manually defined rest that structures the two-phase form.

assumptions (4)

standard math A ruled surface is generated by linear interpolation between two ruling curves (Eq. 1), and the Pavilion envelope can be reconstructed as nine such surfaces from archival drawings.
Standard kinematic surface definition plus a domain reconstruction assumption used throughout §3.3.
domain assumption Vertical geometric displacement is a valid directional control for continuous pitch glissandi; horizontal position is a valid control for event onset time.
Core sonification mapping in §3.4.1–3.4.2; not mathematically forced by Xenakis’s original 2D time–pitch graphs.
ad hoc to paper Local point density along vertical strata is a meaningful proxy for musical “energy” / block duration and stasis after glissandi.
Introduced in §3.4.1 as the organizational principle for the five blocks; central to the motion/stasis narrative.
ad hoc to paper Reusing Metastaseis-associated string/brass/woodwind instrumentation makes the sonification an inversion of Xenakis’s historical process rather than an unrelated mapping.
Stated in §3.2 and §3.4; historical continuity is asserted by instrumentation and form analogy, not by a uniqueness theorem.

invented entities (1)

density-based energy blocks (five vertical strata as musical stasis units)
purpose: Convert spatial point distributions into timed blocks of coordinated string tremolo after glissandi complete.
Not a physical entity but a paper-specific musical construct; independent musical or architectural evidence for exactly five equal-width blocks is not provided.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Extending Xenakis: From Architectural Geometry to Sonification of the Philips Pavilion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3JDTCJTZ

@misc{pith2026260706589,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Extending Xenakis: From Architectural Geometry to Sonification of the Philips Pavilion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3JDTCJTZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06589}
}

read the original abstract

Architecture and music have been linked through proportion and temporal structure, yet architectural geometry is rarely viewed as a source of generative music. Revisiting Xenakis' one-directional transformation from string glissandi in Metastaseis to the ruled surfaces of the Philips Pavilion, we invert this workflow and sonify the completed Pavilion as a temporal composition. We reconstruct the Pavilion as nine ruled surfaces, extract their governing ruling lines, and subdivide each surface into structural lines and spatial sampling points. Four evenly spaced ruling lines per surface generate continuous string glissandi, while 3357 sampled points develop five density-based energy blocks and a sparse brass and woodwind subsequence. Implemented in Python, the system produces MIDI rendered in Ableton Live, accompanied by a real-time 3D visualization that reveals architectural motion, stasis, and structural contrast through sound and image. In general, this work paves the way for the transfer of architectural geometry as a performable musical structure, extending Xenakis's architectural and musical thinking to sonification and interactive music practice.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

[1]

Music is liquid architecture; architecture is frozen music

INTRODUCTION “Music is liquid architecture; architecture is frozen music.” This famous phrase, attributed to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, describes a structural analogy between architec- ture and music [1]. However, contemporary architectural practice reflects architecture as a medium for transmitting music, rather than as a generator of musical structure....

2026
[2]

BACKGROUND AND LITERATURE REVIEW In the eighteenth century, Gotthold Ephraim Lessing dis- tinguished architecture as a spatial art and music as a tem- poral art [10]. While early twentieth-century movements and Le Corbusier’s concepts challenged this separation by introducing narrative or perceptual time [11–13], architec- tural space remained fundamental...

arXiv 2026
[3]

Extending Xenakis

SYSTEM DESIGN 3.1 History-based System Overview Drawing inspiration from Xenakis’s compositional approach inMetastaseisand its architectural realization in thePhilips Pavilion, our system revisits this historical transformation between sound and space. InMetastaseis, Xenakis used the distinctive glissando notation system to extract the con- trol points an...
[4]

Through parametric geometric analysis, we revis- ited the generative logic behind Xenakis’s transition from glissando structures to ruled surfaces inMetastaseis

CONCLUSION This study proposes an architectural sonification system focused on thePhilips Pavilioncreated by Xenakis’sMetas- taseis. Through parametric geometric analysis, we revis- ited the generative logic behind Xenakis’s transition from glissando structures to ruled surfaces inMetastaseis. We then reversed this process to sonify thePhilips Pavilion’s ...
[5]

Debussy, Ravel and Bart´ok: Towards some new concepts of form,

R. Howat, “Debussy, Ravel and Bart´ok: Towards some new concepts of form,”Music & Letters, pp. 285–293, 1977

1977
[6]

Metastaseis: 1953/54,

I. Xenakis, “Metastaseis: 1953/54,” London, 1967, facsimile score

1953
[7]

Mathematics and Design in the Mu- sic of Iannis Xenakis,

R. Wannamaker, “Mathematics and Design in the Mu- sic of Iannis Xenakis,”Xenakis Matters, pp. 127–41, 2012

2012
[8]

The Architectures of Iannis Xenakis,

E. Sikiaridi, “The Architectures of Iannis Xenakis,” Technoetic Arts, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 201–207, 2003

2003

Show all 27 references

[9]

The Philips Pavilion at the 1958 Brus- sels World Fair,

I. Xenakis, C. Vreedenburgh, A. Bouma, F. Ligtenberg, and H. Duyster, “The Philips Pavilion at the 1958 Brus- sels World Fair,”Philips Technical Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–36, 1958

1958
[10]

Strategies for parametric design in archi- tecture,

R. Hudson, “Strategies for parametric design in archi- tecture,”Civ. Eng, vol. 274, pp. 77–81, 2010

2010
[11]

Jabi,Parametric design for architecture

W. Jabi,Parametric design for architecture. Laurence King Publishing, 2013

2013
[12]

Geometry as interface: parametric and combinatorial topological interlocking assemblies,

O. Tessmann and A. Rossi, “Geometry as interface: parametric and combinatorial topological interlocking assemblies,”Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 86, no. 11, p. 111002, 2019

2019
[13]

Theory of sonification,

B. N. Walker and M. A. Nees, “Theory of sonification,” The sonification handbook, vol. 1, pp. 9–39, 2011

2011
[14]

“Telling in Time

K. Speidel, ““Telling in Time” Extended: Temporal- ity in the “Spatial” Arts; How Single Pictures Convey Stories Suspensefully,”Poetics Today, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 669–704, 2020

2020
[15]

H. R. Brown,Physical relativity: Space-time struc- ture from a dynamical perspective. Oxford University Press, 2005

2005
[16]

Representing motion in a static image: constraints and parallels in art, science, and popular culture,

J. E. Cutting, “Representing motion in a static image: constraints and parallels in art, science, and popular culture,”Perception, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1165–1193, 2002

2002
[17]

Giedion,Space, time and architecture: the growth of a new tradition

S. Giedion,Space, time and architecture: the growth of a new tradition. Harvard University Press, 2009

2009
[18]

Liberating sounds: philosophical per- spectives on the music and writings of Helmut Lachen- mann,

A. Heathcote, “Liberating sounds: philosophical per- spectives on the music and writings of Helmut Lachen- mann,” Ph.D. dissertation, Durham University, 2003

2003
[19]

Music as an art of space: interactions be- tween music and architecture in the work of Iannis Xe- nakis,

S. Sterken, “Music as an art of space: interactions be- tween music and architecture in the work of Iannis Xe- nakis,”Resonance: Essays on the intersection of music and architecture, pp. 21–51, 2007

2007
[20]

Iannis Xenakis and the Philips Pavilion,

J. Clarke, “Iannis Xenakis and the Philips Pavilion,” The journal of architecture, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 213– 229, 2012

2012
[21]

S ´everine Bridoux-Michel, Le Corbus- ier, Iannis Xenakis: un dialogue architecture/musique,

N. Boulouch, “S ´everine Bridoux-Michel, Le Corbus- ier, Iannis Xenakis: un dialogue architecture/musique,” Critique d’art. Actualit´e internationale de la litt´erature critique sur l’art contemporain, 2020

2020
[22]

Le Diatope et La L ´egende d’Eer de Ian- nis Xenakis,

M. Solomos, “Le Diatope et La L ´egende d’Eer de Ian- nis Xenakis,”Musique, instruments, machines. Autour des musiques ´electroacoustiques, pp. p–161, 2006

2006
[23]

Reciprocal transformations between mu- sic and architecture as a real-time supporting mecha- nism in urban design,

P. Parthenios, S. Petrovski, N. Chatzopoulou, and K. Mania, “Reciprocal transformations between mu- sic and architecture as a real-time supporting mecha- nism in urban design,”International Journal of Archi- tectural Computing, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 349–357, 2016

2016
[24]

The singing bridge: sonification of a stress-ribbon footbridge,

C. Torresan, G. Bernardes, E. Caetano, and T. Restivo, “The singing bridge: sonification of a stress-ribbon footbridge,” inInternational Conference on ArtsIT, In- teractivity and Game Creation. Springer, 2022, pp. 359–373

2022
[25]

Kinematic surfaces with congru- ent generatrix curves,

S. N. Krivoshapko, “Kinematic surfaces with congru- ent generatrix curves,”RUDN Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 166–176, 2023

2023
[26]

Extending the tonal resources of wind instru- ments: Some contemporary techniques,

G. Read, “Extending the tonal resources of wind instru- ments: Some contemporary techniques,”Music Educa- tors Journal, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 50–55, 1976

1976
[27]

The matplotlib user’s guide,

J. Hunter and D. Dale, “The matplotlib user’s guide,” Matplotlib 0.90. 0 user’s guide, vol. 487, 2007

2007

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Music is liquid architecture; architecture is frozen music

INTRODUCTION “Music is liquid architecture; architecture is frozen music.” This famous phrase, attributed to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, describes a structural analogy between architec- ture and music [1]. However, contemporary architectural practice reflects architecture as a medium for transmitting music, rather than as a generator of musical structure....

2026

[2] [2]

BACKGROUND AND LITERATURE REVIEW In the eighteenth century, Gotthold Ephraim Lessing dis- tinguished architecture as a spatial art and music as a tem- poral art [10]. While early twentieth-century movements and Le Corbusier’s concepts challenged this separation by introducing narrative or perceptual time [11–13], architec- tural space remained fundamental...

arXiv 2026

[3] [3]

Extending Xenakis

SYSTEM DESIGN 3.1 History-based System Overview Drawing inspiration from Xenakis’s compositional approach inMetastaseisand its architectural realization in thePhilips Pavilion, our system revisits this historical transformation between sound and space. InMetastaseis, Xenakis used the distinctive glissando notation system to extract the con- trol points an...

[4] [4]

Through parametric geometric analysis, we revis- ited the generative logic behind Xenakis’s transition from glissando structures to ruled surfaces inMetastaseis

CONCLUSION This study proposes an architectural sonification system focused on thePhilips Pavilioncreated by Xenakis’sMetas- taseis. Through parametric geometric analysis, we revis- ited the generative logic behind Xenakis’s transition from glissando structures to ruled surfaces inMetastaseis. We then reversed this process to sonify thePhilips Pavilion’s ...

[5] [5]

Debussy, Ravel and Bart´ok: Towards some new concepts of form,

R. Howat, “Debussy, Ravel and Bart´ok: Towards some new concepts of form,”Music & Letters, pp. 285–293, 1977

1977

[6] [6]

Metastaseis: 1953/54,

I. Xenakis, “Metastaseis: 1953/54,” London, 1967, facsimile score

1953

[7] [7]

Mathematics and Design in the Mu- sic of Iannis Xenakis,

R. Wannamaker, “Mathematics and Design in the Mu- sic of Iannis Xenakis,”Xenakis Matters, pp. 127–41, 2012

2012

[8] [8]

The Architectures of Iannis Xenakis,

E. Sikiaridi, “The Architectures of Iannis Xenakis,” Technoetic Arts, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 201–207, 2003

2003