Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Robust and Efficient Parametric Spectral Estimation in Atomic Force Microscopy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1706.08938 v1 pith:3KLOOPW2 submitted 2017-06-27 stat.AP

classification stat.AP
keywords estimationparameterspectralatomicdataefficiencyelectronicestimates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

An atomic force microscope (AFM) is capable of producing ultra-high resolution measurements of nanoscopic objects and forces. It is an indispensable tool for various scientific disciplines such as molecular engineering, solid-state physics, and cell biology. Prior to a given experiment, the AFM must be calibrated by fitting a spectral density model to baseline recordings. However, since AFM experiments typically collect large amounts of data, parameter estimation by maximum likelihood can be prohibitively expensive. Thus, practitioners routinely employ a much faster least-squares estimation method, at the cost of substantially reduced statistical efficiency. Additionally, AFM data is often contaminated by periodic electronic noise, to which parameter estimates are highly sensitive. This article proposes a two-stage estimator to address these issues. Preliminary parameter estimates are first obtained by a variance-stabilizing procedure, by which the simplicity of least-squares combines with the efficiency of maximum likelihood. A test for spectral periodicities then eliminates high-impact outliers, considerably and robustly protecting the second-stage estimator from the effects of electronic noise. Simulation and experimental results indicate that a two- to ten-fold reduction in mean squared error can be expected by applying our methodology.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools