pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.08008 · v1 · pith:3LBYKBZ3new · submitted 2019-06-19 · ⚛️ physics.hist-ph

How "Facts" Shaped Modern Disciplines: The Fluid Concept of Fact and the Common Origins of German Physics and Historiography

Sjang L. Ten Hagen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 20:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.hist-ph
keywords concept of factGerman physicshistoriographydiscipline formationGöttingenSchlözerLichtenberghistorical knowledge tradition
0
0 comments X

The pith

German physics and historiography share origins in a late-18th-century fluid concept of fact from a shared historical knowledge tradition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that the practices emphasizing facts in German physics and historiography came from a shared historical knowledge tradition rather than arising separately. The concept of fact entered German usage late in the eighteenth century and was integrated into emerging disciplines at the University of Göttingen by figures like Schlözer and Lichtenberg, who viewed facts as eternal knowledge distinct from theories. During discipline formation the concept stayed fluid, acquiring different roles only after 1800 when facts gained self-contained value in each field. A sympathetic reader would care because this reveals the common roots of empirical approaches in science and history, challenging assumptions of independent disciplinary development.

Core claim

The fact-oriented practices of German physicists and historians derived from common origins in a historical knowledge tradition around 1800, with the concept of fact remaining fluid during discipline formation at institutions such as Göttingen. Schlözer and Lichtenberg construed facts as the basis of Wissenschaft but not as Wissenschaft itself, contrasting them with short-lived theories and speculations. Only after 1800 did empirically minded German physicists and historians grant facts self-contained value, leading to specialized practices such as precision measurement in physics and source criticism in historiography.

What carries the argument

The fluid concept of fact within the historical knowledge tradition that included both human and natural empirical study, adopted and reinterpreted during discipline formation at Göttingen around 1800.

If this is right

  • Physics and historiography did not develop their fact-oriented practices independently but inherited them from a common historical knowledge tradition.
  • At Göttingen around 1800 facts were treated as eternal knowledge in contrast to transient theories and speculations in both fields.
  • After 1800 the concept of fact acquired distinct interpretations tied to specific research practices as each discipline became institutionalized.
  • The shared tradition implies that early empirical study bridged what later became separated natural and human sciences.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar shared origins could exist in the formation of other fields that later emphasized empirical facts, such as certain social sciences.
  • The historical account of fact fluidity might clarify ongoing tensions between empirical claims and interpretive methods across disciplines today.
  • Comparing Göttingen with other contemporary German universities could test whether the pattern of common origins was local or more general.

Load-bearing premise

The specific views of facts held by Schlözer and Lichtenberg can be taken as representative of wider epistemological changes and directly shaped later disciplinary practices in physics and historiography.

What would settle it

Archival evidence showing that fact-oriented practices in German physics originated from an independent source, such as direct British experimental influences, without connection to the historical knowledge tradition at Göttingen.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.08008 by Sjang L. Ten Hagen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This history of the concept of fact reveals that the fact-oriented practices of German physicists and historians derived from common origins. The concept of fact became part of the German language remarkably late. It gained momentum only toward the end of the eighteenth century. I show that the concept of fact emerged as part of a historical knowledge tradition, which comprised both human and natural empirical study. Around 1800, parts of this tradition, including the concept of fact, were integrated into the epistemological basis of several emerging disciplines, including physics and historiography. During this process of discipline formation, the concept of fact remained fluid. I reveal this fluidity by unearthing different interpretations and roles of facts in different German contexts around 1800. I demonstrate how a fact-based epistemology emerged at the University of G\"ottingen in the late eighteenth century, by focusing on universal historian August Ludwig Schl\"ozer and the experimentalist Georg Christoph Lichtenberg. In a time of scientific and political revolutions, they regarded facts as eternal knowledge, contrasting them with short-lived theories and speculations. Remarkably, Schl\"ozer and Lichtenberg construed facts as the basis of Wissenschaft, but not as Wissenschaft itself. Only after 1800, empirically minded German physicists and historians granted facts self-contained value. As physics and historiography became institutionalized at German universities, the concept of fact acquired different interpretations in different disciplinary settings. These related to fact-oriented research practices, such as precision measurement in physics and source criticism in historiography.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper traces the late emergence of the German concept of 'fact' (Tatsache) within a shared historical knowledge tradition that encompassed both human and natural empirical inquiry. It argues that around 1800 this concept was integrated into the epistemological foundations of emerging disciplines at institutions such as Göttingen, where universal historian August Ludwig Schlözer and experimentalist Georg Christoph Lichtenberg treated facts as eternal, stable knowledge that grounded Wissenschaft without constituting Wissenschaft itself. The manuscript shows that, during subsequent disciplinary institutionalization, the concept remained fluid and acquired distinct roles—precision measurement in physics and source criticism in historiography—while facts gained self-contained epistemic value only after 1800.

Significance. If the interpretive claims hold, the work contributes a concrete case study to the history of concepts and the co-formation of scientific and humanistic disciplines in the German university context. It supplies historically grounded evidence for the fluidity of epistemological categories during discipline formation and links specific Göttingen practices to later fact-oriented research norms. The manuscript's strength lies in its focused comparison of two contemporaneous figures and its attention to the distinction between facts as basis versus facts as Wissenschaft.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and sections on Schlözer/Lichtenberg] The central claim that Schlözer’s and Lichtenberg’s views of facts as eternal knowledge directly informed later disciplinary practices (precision measurement and source criticism) rests on the representativeness of these two cases. The manuscript should supply additional contemporary sources or explicit discussion of selection criteria to substantiate that these interpretations were not idiosyncratic but shaped the wider epistemological shift described in the abstract.
minor comments (3)
  1. Clarify the precise meaning and range of 'Wissenschaft' in the late-eighteenth-century German context when contrasting it with 'facts'; the current usage risks anachronism for readers outside German intellectual history.
  2. The transition from 'fluid' pre-1800 usages to post-1800 disciplinary differentiation would benefit from a short table or timeline listing key textual passages and their differing roles for 'fact'.
  3. Add references to recent secondary literature on the history of the fact concept (e.g., works by Lorraine Daston or other historians of epistemology) to situate the Göttingen case within existing scholarship.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful report and positive recommendation for minor revision. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the argument.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and sections on Schlözer/Lichtenberg] The central claim that Schlözer’s and Lichtenberg’s views of facts as eternal knowledge directly informed later disciplinary practices (precision measurement and source criticism) rests on the representativeness of these two cases. The manuscript should supply additional contemporary sources or explicit discussion of selection criteria to substantiate that these interpretations were not idiosyncratic but shaped the wider epistemological shift described in the abstract.

    Authors: The manuscript does not assert a direct causal influence from Schlözer’s and Lichtenberg’s specific views onto later disciplinary norms; instead, it uses these two Göttingen figures as contemporaneous case studies to illustrate the late-18th-century integration of the fact concept into an emerging fact-based epistemology shared across human and natural inquiry. Their selection rests on their prominence at the same institution during the critical period around 1800, which permits a focused comparison of how facts were positioned as stable but non-Wissenschaft. To address the concern about representativeness, we will add an explicit paragraph on selection criteria (in the introduction) and cite two or three additional contemporary sources (e.g., other Göttingen scholars and parallel statements in contemporary journals) that echo the same contrast between eternal facts and transient theories. This revision will clarify the scope of the claim without altering the paper’s core argument about common origins and subsequent fluidity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; argument rests on external historical sources

full rationale

The paper presents an interpretive historical analysis tracing the concept of 'fact' through primary sources from figures such as Schlözer and Lichtenberg at Göttingen around 1800. No mathematical derivations, equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-referential definitions appear. The central claim—that fact-oriented practices in physics and historiography shared origins in a historical knowledge tradition—is advanced via case-based examination of external texts and contexts rather than by reducing to the paper's own inputs or self-citations. The argument explicitly notes fluidity and disciplinary differentiation, drawing on independent historical evidence without load-bearing self-citation chains or ansatz smuggling. This is a standard non-circular outcome for interpretive scholarship grounded in primary sources.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a qualitative historical study with no mathematical derivations, data fitting, or quantitative models. No free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented physical entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5804 in / 1022 out tokens · 26129 ms · 2026-05-25T20:09:17.674637+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Shapiro, Culture of Fact (ref

    The theological-historical origins of the concept of fact in Germany thus interlinked with the English context. Shapiro, Culture of Fact (ref. 3), 168– 88

    work page

  2. [2]

    Der Theologiegeschichtliche Hintergrund des Begriffes ‘Tatsache’,

    Reinhart Staats, “Der Theologiegeschichtliche Hintergrund des Begriffes ‘Tatsache’,” Zeitschrift fu¨ r Theologie und Kirche 70, no. 3 (1973): 316– 45

    work page 1973

  3. [3]

    U¨ ber das Wo¨ rtlein Thatsache,

    Gotthold E. Lessing, “U¨ ber das Wo¨ rtlein Thatsache,” in Sa¨ mmtliche Schriften, vol. 11, ed. Karl Lachmann (Berlin: Voß, 1839), 645. Translation of German quotes into English are mine, unless stated otherwise. HOW “ FACTS” SHAPED MODERN DISCIPLINES | 307 Latin words datum and data came into wider circulation. 32 These and other German terms, such as Be...

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    A ¨ lteres kritisches Wa¨ ldchen,

    In 1768, Herder used factum and datum interchangeably with Begebenheit. Johann G. Herder, “A ¨ lteres kritisches Wa¨ ldchen,” in Schriften zur A¨ sthetik und Literatur 1767– 1781, ed. Gunter E. Grimm (Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Klassiker Verlag, 1993), 11– 56,o n 11– 12

    work page 1993

  5. [5]

    ‘Ho ¨ herer’ Empirismus: Passive Wissenschaft, Letzte Tatsachen und Experimentelle Philosophie bei FWJ Schelling,

    On the emergence of the concept of fact in late eighteenth-century German philosophy and literature: Paul Ziche, “‘Ho ¨ herer’ Empirismus: Passive Wissenschaft, Letzte Tatsachen und Experimentelle Philosophie bei FWJ Schelling,” in Philosophie und Wissenschaft / Philosophy and Science, ed. Ju¨ rgen Stolzenberg and Fred Rush (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011), 165...

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Structuring the History of Knowledge in an Age of Transition: The Go¨ ttingen Geschichte between Historia Literaria and the Rise of the Disciplines,

    Dirk van Miert, “Structuring the History of Knowledge in an Age of Transition: The Go¨ ttingen Geschichte between Historia Literaria and the Rise of the Disciplines,” History of Humanities 2, no. 2 (2017): 389– 416,o n 392

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    The Sociology of Scientific Disciplines: On the Genesis and Stability of the Disciplinary Structure of Modern Science,

    Rudolf Stichweh, “The Sociology of Scientific Disciplines: On the Genesis and Stability of the Disciplinary Structure of Modern Science,” Science in Context 5, no. 1 (1992): 3– 15,o n 9. HOW “ FACTS” SHAPED MODERN DISCIPLINES | 309 development of modern historiography.” 36 In the following, I discuss the role and importance of facts in the so-called Go ¨ t...

    work page 1992

  8. [8]

    Change of Paradigm as a Squabble between Institutions,

    Martin Gierl, “Change of Paradigm as a Squabble between Institutions,” in Scholars in Action: The Practice of Knowledge and the Figure of the Savant in the 18th Century , ed. Andr ´e Holenstein, Hubert Steinke, and Martin Stuber (Leiden: Brill, 2013), 286– 87

    work page 2013

  9. [10]

    data-driven

    Schlo¨ zer’s use of tables has been identified as “data-driven” practice in the context of his work as a statistician, which illustrates his multilateral profile as a researcher. David Sepkoski and Marco Tamborini, “‘An Image of Science’: Cameralism, Statistics, and the Visual Language of Natural History in the Nineteenth Century,” Historical Studies in the...

    work page 2018

  10. [11]

    Peter H. Reill,The German Enlightenment and the Rise of Historicism(Berkeley: University of California Press,1975); Martin Peters,Altes Reich und Europa: der Historiker, Statistiker und Publizist August Ludwig (v.) Schlo¨ zer (1735– 1809) (Mu¨ nster: LIT Verlag, 2003); Martin Gierl, Geschichte als pra¨ zisierte Wissenschaft: Johann Christoph Gatterer und ...

    work page 1975

  11. [12]

    Justin Stagl, A History of Curiosity (Chur: Harwood, 1995), 246

    Schlo¨ zer’s lectures at the University of Go ¨ ttingen attracted hundreds of students, and his periodic journals were read by thousands. Justin Stagl, A History of Curiosity (Chur: Harwood, 1995), 246

    work page 1995

  12. [13]

    As quoted by Claudia Schrapel, Johann Dominicus Fiorillo (Zu¨ rich: Hildesheim, 2004), 175

    work page 2004

  13. [14]

    the best world history is the one that contains the most expediently selected [ Facta]

    August L. Schlo ¨ zer, Vorstellung seiner Universal-Historie ,v o l . 2 (Go¨ ttingen/Gotha, 1773), 253. HOW “ FACTS” SHAPED MODERN DISCIPLINES | 311 In the first edition of Schlo ¨ zer’s Vorstellung seiner Universal-Historie (1772), he argued that the aim of universal history, or world history ( Weltgeschichte), was to present as many facts as possible and...

    work page

  14. [15]

    Schlo¨ zer, Vorstellung seiner Universal-Historie,v o l .1 (Go¨ ttingen/Gotha, 1772), 45

    August L. Schlo¨ zer, Vorstellung seiner Universal-Historie,v o l .1 (Go¨ ttingen/Gotha, 1772), 45

    work page

  15. [16]

    synchronistic

    Schlo¨ zer’s work contained “synchronistic” tables (ibid., 89– 93) and “ethnographic” tables (ibid. 109– 10). He argued that such tables form the basis of universal history: Schlo ¨ zer, Vor- stellung, vol. 2 (ref. 42), 248. On the use of tables in early modern historiography and their relation to facts: Benjamin Steiner, Die Ordnung der Geschichte: Histo...

    work page 2008

  16. [17]

    Schlo¨ zer, Vorstellung, vol. 2 (ref. 42), 254

    work page

  17. [18]

    factual proposition

    Ibid., 235 (footnote). 312 |T E NH A G E N the term (which may be translated as “factual proposition”) to justify that the basic units of his universal history were often generalizations rather than indi- vidual events. Nonetheless, Schlo¨ zer’s introduction of the novel term Thatsatz, which was never broadly adopted, underlines the ambiguities surroundin...

    work page

  18. [19]

    critical method digs up the [ Facta] from annals and monuments one by one (the Voltaires make them themselves, or at least color them)

    In 1785,S c h l o¨ zer distinguished between three different roles in historical practice, using Faktum, Tatsatz,a n d Tatsache interchangeably: the GeschichtSammler collects as many facts as HOW “ FACTS” SHAPED MODERN DISCIPLINES | 313 that Schlo¨ zer eventually considered these terms as synonyms, but it is difficult to determine at what point Schlo ¨ zer...

    work page 1990

  19. [20]

    William Clark, Academic Charisma and the Origins of the Research University (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2006), 141– 82

    work page 2006

  20. [21]

    Reill, Rise of Historicism (ref. 39), 84

    work page

  21. [22]

    Michaelis, Einleitung in die go¨ ttlichen Schriften des Neuen Bundes, 4th ed., vol

    Johann D. Michaelis, Einleitung in die go¨ ttlichen Schriften des Neuen Bundes, 4th ed., vol. 1, (Go¨ ttingen: Vandenhoek, 1788), 574 and 794

    work page

  22. [23]

    a book that develops and presents its merits from [Thatsachen]

    Schlo¨ zer, Vorstellung, vol. 1 (ref. 43), 45. On Gatterer and Schlo¨ zer’s distaste for French historiography, see Reill, Rise of Historicism (ref. 39), 36– 37. 314 |T E NH A G E N Schlo¨ zer’s polemic rhetoric was not only aimed at the French, but also at a prominent, German-speaking contemporary: Johann Gottfried Herder (1744– 1803). In the beginning o...

    work page

  23. [24]

    Rationalism and Irrationalism in Early German Ethnology: The Controversy between Schlo¨ zer and Herder, 1772/73,

    The review was published on 28 July: Johann G. Herder, review of Vorstellung seiner Universal Historie , by August L. Schlo¨ zer, Frankfurter gelehrte Anzeigen 60 (1772): 473– 78. For more context, see: Justin Stagl, “Rationalism and Irrationalism in Early German Ethnology: The Controversy between Schlo¨ zer and Herder, 1772/73,” Anthropos, 93, no. 4 (199...

    work page 1998

  24. [25]

    Schlo¨ zer, Vorstellung, vol. 2 (ref. 42), 384

    work page

  25. [26]

    13), 98– 166

    Beiser, Historicist Tradition (ref. 13), 98– 166

    work page

  26. [27]

    39), 404

    As quoted by Peters, Schlo¨ zer (ref. 39), 404

    work page

  27. [28]

    a blend of history and natural science

    Historian of science John Heilbron has typified the prevalent spirit at the university as “a blend of history and natural science.” John L. Heilbron, “Physics and Its History at Go ¨ ttingen around 1800,” in Go¨ ttingen and the Development of the Natural Sciences , ed. Nicolaas A. Rupke (Go¨ ttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2002), 50– 71,o n 67. HOW “ FACTS” SHA...

    work page 2002

  28. [29]

    The Controversy between Schlo¨ zer and Herder

    On Schlo¨ zer’s intellectual and personal relation with Linneaus: Stagl, “The Controversy between Schlo¨ zer and Herder” (ref. 55), 528. On Gatterer’s inclinations toward natural history: Martin Gierl, “Das Alphabet der Natur und das Alphabet der Kultur im 18. Jahrhundert,” NTM Zeitschrift fu¨ r Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 18, no. 1...

    work page 2010

  29. [30]

    41), 184– 99

    Schrapel, Johann Dominicus Fiorillo (ref. 41), 184– 99

    work page

  30. [31]

    The Go ¨ ttingen Geschichte

    Van Miert, “The Go ¨ ttingen Geschichte” (ref. 34), 400, presents a table with a full overview of the volumes published under the banner of Eichhorn’s project. On J. C. Fischer’s career and contribution, see Heilbron, “Physics and Its History” (ref. 59), 55– 59

    work page

  31. [32]

    Eichhorn, Allgemeine Geschichte der Cultur und Litteratur des neueren Europas (Go¨ ttingen: 1796– 1799), lxxxii

    Johann G. Eichhorn, Allgemeine Geschichte der Cultur und Litteratur des neueren Europas (Go¨ ttingen: 1796– 1799), lxxxii

    work page

  32. [33]

    The Go ¨ ttingen Geschichte

    Van Miert, “The Go ¨ ttingen Geschichte” (ref. 34), 397. 316 |T E NH A G E N came to be considered as the basic units of proper, empirical historiography. Still, the ultimate goal of the new fact-oriented empiricism among the members of the Go ¨ ttingen School remained to construct a system of facts, analogous to that of Linnaeus. FACTS IN LICHTENBERG’S E...

    work page

  33. [34]

    From Enlightenment to Romanticism: Lichtenberg and Go ¨ ttingen Physics,

    William Clark, “From Enlightenment to Romanticism: Lichtenberg and Go ¨ ttingen Physics,” in Rupke, Go¨ ttingen Natural Science (ref. 59), 72– 85,o n 74– 75

    work page

  34. [35]

    Performance and Play: Lichtenberg’s Lectures on Experimental Physics,

    Claire Baldwin, “Performance and Play: Lichtenberg’s Lectures on Experimental Physics,” in Performing Knowledge, 1750– 1850, ed. Mary Helen Dupree and Sean B. Franzel (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2015), 193– 220,o n 210– 11

    work page 2015

  35. [36]

    Nature, Knowledge, and Scientific Theories in GC Lichtenberg’s Re- flections on Physics,

    Steven Tester, “Nature, Knowledge, and Scientific Theories in GC Lichtenberg’s Re- flections on Physics,” HOPOS 6, no. 2 (2016): 185– 211,o n 194. HOW “ FACTS” SHAPED MODERN DISCIPLINES | 317 direction that my course of thought took under your guidance. Truth is valuable in itself, but more valuable still is the skill to find it.” 68 On the one hand, Lichten...

    work page 2016

  36. [37]

    Lichtenberg’s Lectures

    As quoted by Baldwin, “Lichtenberg’s Lectures” (ref. 66), 209

    work page

  37. [38]

    humanist-scientist

    This has enticed some to portray Lichtenberg, somewhat anachronistically, as a “humanist-scientist”: Franz H. Mautner and Franklin Miller Jr., “Remarks on GC Lichtenberg, Humanist-Scientist,” Isis 43, no. 3 (1952): 223– 31

    work page 1952

  38. [39]

    G. Ch. Lichtenberg als Geschichtsschreiber,

    Lothar Kolmer, “G. Ch. Lichtenberg als Geschichtsschreiber,” Archiv fu¨ r Kulturgeschichte 65, no. 2 (1983): 371– 416

    work page 1983

  39. [40]

    Bernard Cohen, Revolution in Science (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1985), 225 and 517– 19

    I. Bernard Cohen, Revolution in Science (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1985), 225 and 517– 19

    work page 1985

  40. [41]

    Men are for the most part such reckless observers,

    Ulrich Joost and Albrecht Scho¨ ne, eds., Lichtenberg: Briefwechsel , vol. 4 (Munich: C.H. Beck, 1992), 1025. 318 |T E NH A G E N terminological complexity so characteristic of the early history of the concept of fact in the German language. F a c t sV e r s u sT h e o r i e s Like Schlo¨ zer, Lichtenberg began to use the concept of fact in his writings f...

    work page 1992

  41. [42]

    Rather, he used the term Naturbegebenheiten (natural events)

    Lichtenberg’s predecessor, Erxleben, did not use the term “fact” to conceptualize the empirical basis of physics. Rather, he used the term Naturbegebenheiten (natural events). Johann C. P. Erxleben, Anfangsgru¨ nde der Naturlehre (Go¨ ttingen/Gotha, 1772), 4

    work page

  42. [43]

    Johann S. T. Gehler, Physikalisches Wo¨ rterbu¨ ch, oder, Versuch einer Erkla ¨ rung der vor- nehmsten Begriffe und Kunstwo¨ rter der Naturlehre , 6 vols., (Leipzig, 1787– 1796)

    work page

  43. [44]

    Lichtenberg’s Reflections on Physics

    Tester, “Lichtenberg’s Reflections on Physics” (ref. 67), 189

    work page

  44. [45]

    Anfangsgru ¨ nde der Nat- urlehre

    Wiard Hinrichs, Albert Krayer, and Horst Zehe, eds., Lichtenbergs annotiertes Handex- emplar der vierten Auflage von Johann Christian Polykarp Erxleben: “ Anfangsgru ¨ nde der Nat- urlehre” (Go¨ ttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2005), 801. HOW “ FACTS” SHAPED MODERN DISCIPLINES | 319 Lichtenberg’s ideas on the methods of Naturlehre and Schlo¨ zer’s on those of U...

    work page 2005

  45. [46]

    Notizen und Materialen zur Astronomie und Physischen Geographie (Go¨ ttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2013), 500

    Albert Krayer and Thomas Nickol, eds., Georg Christoph Lichtenberg: Vorlesungen zur Naturlehre. Notizen und Materialen zur Astronomie und Physischen Geographie (Go¨ ttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2013), 500

    work page 2013

  46. [47]

    Lichtenberg and Go ¨ ttingen Physics

    As translated and quoted by Clark, “Lichtenberg and Go ¨ ttingen Physics” (ref. 65), 77

    work page

  47. [48]

    Humanist-Scientist

    Mautner and Miller, “Humanist-Scientist” (ref. 69), 225

    work page

  48. [49]

    Lichtenberg and Go ¨ ttingen Physics

    Clark, “Lichtenberg and Go ¨ ttingen Physics” (ref. 65), 77. Lichtenberg’s “agnostic position” with regard to theory is also discussed in: Geoffrey Winthrop-Young, “Lichtenberg und die Franzo¨ sische Revolution: Zum Verha¨ ltnis von Sprache, Naturwissenschaft und Aufkla¨ rung” (PhD dissertation, The University of British Columbia, 1991), 105

    work page 1991

  49. [50]

    Physics and Its History

    Heilbron, “Physics and Its History” (ref. 59), 61

    work page

  50. [51]

    an excel- lent collection of facts

    The increasing interest in and presence of measuring instruments in Germany in the late eighteenth century cannot be seen separately from parallel technological developments. For a balanced view on this issue, see: Klein, Humboldts Preußen (ref. 15). 320 |T E NH A G E N valid facts.83 Lichtenberg praised Deluc’s work because it contained “an excel- lent c...

    work page

  51. [52]

    Notizen und Materialen zur Experimentalphysik, Teil1 (Go¨ ttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2007), 674

    Horst Zehe, Albert Krayer, and Wiard Hinrichs, eds., Georg Christoph Lichtenberg: Vorle- sungen zur Naturlehre. Notizen und Materialen zur Experimentalphysik, Teil1 (Go¨ ttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2007), 674

    work page 2007

  52. [53]

    77), 384

    Krayer and Nickol, Lichtenberg: Vorlesungen zur Naturlehre (ref. 77), 384

    work page

  53. [54]

    Apter, Jacques Lezra, Steven Rendall, and Michael Wood, eds., Dictionary of untranslatables: A philosophical lexicon (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014), 1113– 17

    Barbara Cassin, Emily S. Apter, Jacques Lezra, Steven Rendall, and Michael Wood, eds., Dictionary of untranslatables: A philosophical lexicon (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014), 1113– 17

    work page 2014

  54. [55]

    Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews, eds., Critique of the Power of Judgment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 332 (footnote)

    work page 2000

  55. [56]

    FACTS” SHAPED MODERN DISCIPLINES | 321 [Lehrgeba¨ ude] has long collapsed

    Ibid. HOW “ FACTS” SHAPED MODERN DISCIPLINES | 321 [Lehrgeba¨ ude] has long collapsed.” For this reason, Humboldt, like his teacher Lichtenberg, argued for a stringent separation between fact and con- jecture: “I shall separate the [ Thatsachen] themselves from my conjectures. This way of treating natural phenomena to me seems the most fertile and sound.”...

    work page

  56. [57]

    Ueber die gereizte Muskelfaser, aus einem Briefe an Herrn Hofrath Blumenbach,

    Alexander von Humboldt, “Ueber die gereizte Muskelfaser, aus einem Briefe an Herrn Hofrath Blumenbach,” Neues Journal der Physik 2 (1795): 115– 29,o n 127

    work page

  57. [58]

    74), vol

    Gehler, Physikalisches Wo¨ rterbuch (ref. 74), vol. 2, 678

    work page

  58. [59]

    Physics and Its History

    Heilbron, “Physics and Its History” (ref. 59), 61– 65

    work page

  59. [60]

    Lichtenberg und die Revolution

    Winthrop-Young, “Lichtenberg und die Revolution” (ref. 80), ii

    work page

  60. [61]

    As quoted in ibid., 137

    work page

  61. [62]

    Physics and Its History

    Heilbron, “Physics and Its History” (ref. 59), 65. 322 |T E NH A G E N enemy of speculative systems and theories, and a prominent proponent of empirical facts.94 In Johann Fischer’s Geschichte der Physik, for example, Bacon was portrayed as “the first to show the true way,” whereas Descartes and his followers were blamed for “wander[ing] from the true path...

    work page

  62. [63]

    Lichtenberg and Go ¨ ttingen Physics

    Clark, “Lichtenberg and Go ¨ ttingen Physics” (ref. 65), 80

    work page

  63. [64]

    Physics and Its History

    As quoted by Heilbron, “Physics and Its History” (ref. 59), 59

    work page

  64. [65]

    ‘Baconianism’ in Revolutionary Germany: Humboldt’s ‘Great Instauration’,

    Michael Dettelbach, “‘Baconianism’ in Revolutionary Germany: Humboldt’s ‘Great Instauration’,” in The Skeptical Tradition Around 1800, ed. Johan van der Zande and Richard H. Popkin (Dordrecht: Springer, 1998), 175– 86,o n 178

    work page 1998

  65. [66]

    Baconsche Tatsachen

    Shapiro, Culture of Fact (ref. 3); Daston, “Baconsche Tatsachen” (ref. 23)

    work page

  66. [67]

    revolt against theory

    David Simpson has explored the links between what he calls the English “revolt against theory” and contemporary nationalist discourse in the wake of the French revolution. David Simpson, Romanticism, Nationalism, and the Revolt Against Theory (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993)

    work page 1993

  67. [68]

    The Invention of Theoretische Chemie: Forms and Uses of German Chemistry Textbooks, 1775– 1820,

    A study of German chemistry textbooks around 1800 underlines this interpretation of the of fact as eternal: Jan Frercks and Michael Markert, “The Invention of Theoretische Chemie: Forms and Uses of German Chemistry Textbooks, 1775– 1820,” Ambix 54, no. 2 (2007): 146– 71, on 155. Also Frercks, “Facticity of Facts” (ref. 3). HOW “ FACTS” SHAPED MODERN DISCI...

    work page 2007

  68. [69]

    Reill, Rise of Historicism (ref. 39), 8

    work page

  69. [70]

    Gianna Pomata and Nancy G

    Arno Seifert, Cognitio Historica: Die Geschichte als Namengeberin der fru ¨ hneuzeitlichen Empirie (Berlin: Duncker & Humboldt, 1976), 163– 78. Gianna Pomata and Nancy G. Siraisi, eds., Historia: Empiricism and Erudition in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2005)

    work page 1976

  70. [71]

    horizontal

    As quoted by Seifert, Cognitio Historica (ref. 101), 185– 86. 324 |T E NH A G E N positioned hierarchically below mathematics and philosophy.103 For a significant part of the eighteenth century, the historical and the empirical were thus under- stood equivalent. But they were not regarded as wissenschaftlich. Only philoso- phy and mathematics were consider...

    work page

  71. [72]

    11), 14– 38

    Stichweh, Zur Entstehung wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen (ref. 11), 14– 38

    work page

  72. [73]

    knowledge brought into teachable form

    This ties in with Rudolf Stichweh’s characterization of a discipline as “knowledge brought into teachable form.” Ibid., 7. HOW “ FACTS” SHAPED MODERN DISCIPLINES | 325 were established, refined, and passed on to next generations. Furthermore, the boundaries of disciplines became more clearly established by the foundation of institutes, journals, and univer...

    work page

  73. [74]

    See, e.g.: Stichweh, Sociology of Scientific Disciplines (ref

    A lot has been written on the foundation of the University of Berlin, its indebtedness to Go¨ ttingen, and the role of these universities in the formation of modern scientific and humanistic disciplines. See, e.g.: Stichweh, Sociology of Scientific Disciplines (ref. 35), 9; Chad Wellmon, Organizing Enlightenment: Information Overload and the Invention of th...

    work page 2015

  74. [75]

    A well-ordered [ Lehrgeba¨ ude] of an empirical science,

    Stichweh, Zur Entstehung wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen (ref. 11), 94– 172. 326 |T E NH A G E N Naturlehre, took more of a distinctive shape in the first two decades of the nineteenth century. In this period, physicists defined their materializing dis- cipline as a pursuit of facts. A clear-cut example of a physicist employing this demarcation strategy was ...

    work page

  75. [76]

    15), 279

    Klein, Humboldts Preußen (ref. 15), 279. On the political backgrounds of the foundation of the University of Berlin: e.g., Charles E. McClelland, State, Society, and University in Germany, 1700– 1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), 101– 50

    work page 1914

  76. [77]

    These editions of Fischer’s two-volume book were aimed to be used in physics instruction at German universities and became very influential

    References are to the third edition of Fischer’s book from 1827, which includes the preface to the second edition from 1819. These editions of Fischer’s two-volume book were aimed to be used in physics instruction at German universities and became very influential. Ernst G. Fischer, Lehrbuch der mechanischen Naturlehre , 2 vols. (Berlin/Leipzig: G.C. Nauck, 1827)

    work page

  77. [78]

    dark, unclear, and mystical concepts

    Ibid., vol. 2., 131. HOW “ FACTS” SHAPED MODERN DISCIPLINES | 327 Fischer’s emphasis on facts must be understood as a response to certain trends that he perceived as threatening his emerging discipline. 113 To begin with, Fischer criticized the “dark, unclear, and mystical concepts” of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s ( 1775– 1854) anti-Newtonian theory of co...

    work page

  78. [79]

    Sepper, Goethe Contra Newton (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 158– 73

    Dennis L. Sepper, Goethe Contra Newton (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 158– 73

    work page 1988

  79. [80]

    109), vol

    Fischer, Lehrbuch (ref. 109), vol. 1, xii

    work page

  80. [81]

    Berzelius’ und Gustav Magnus’ Briefwechsel in den Jahren1828– 1847 (Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, 1900), 63

    Edvard Hjelt, Aus Jac. Berzelius’ und Gustav Magnus’ Briefwechsel in den Jahren1828– 1847 (Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, 1900), 63

    work page 1900

Showing first 80 references.