Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Radio Loud / Radio Quiet dichotomy: news from the 2dF QSO Redshift Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0301526 v2 pith:3MLIBVBL submitted 2003-01-27 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords radioredshiftsourcesdichotomyquasarsampleanalysisdistribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a detailed analysis of a sample of radio-detected quasars, obtained by matching together objects from the FIRST and 2dF Quasar Redshift Surveys. The dataset consists of 113 sources, spanning a redshift range 0.3 < z < 2.2, with optical magnitudes 18.25 < b_J < 20.85 and radio fluxes S_{1.4 GHz} < 1 mJy. These objects exhibit properties such as redshift and colour distribution in full agreement with those derived for the whole quasar population, suggestive of an independence of the mechanism(s) controlling the birth and life-time of quasars of their level of radio emission. The long debated question of radio-loud (RL)/radio-quiet (RQ) dichotomy is then investigated for the combined FIRST-2dF and FIRST-LBQS sample, since they present similar selection criteria. We find the fraction of radio detections to increase with magnitude from < 3% at the faintest levels up to 20% for the brightest sources. The classical RL/RQ dichotomy, in which the distribution of radio-to-optical ratios and/or radio luminosities shows a lack of sources, is ruled out by our analysis. We also find no tight relationship between optical and radio luminosities for sources in the considered sample, result that tends to exclude the mass of the quasar black hole as the physical quantity associated to the level of radio emission.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools