Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Vestigial Order Melting of a Chiral Atomic Superfluid in a Double-Valley Optical Lattice

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read In a shaken optical lattice, a chiral superfluid melts in two stages—time-reversal symmetry is restored at a lower temperature than the superfluid order—and the vestigial paramagnetic-superfluid window widens as the valley separation…

desk verdict Credible first experiment on vestigial order melting in a chiral atomic superfluid, but the Ising transition temperature is confounded by a density-normalized order parameter and needs a reanalysis. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07494 v2 pith:3MNIQEMM submitted 2025-07-10 cond-mat.quant-gas

classification cond-mat.quant-gas PACS 67.85.Hj03.75.Lm
keywords chiralsuperfluidvestigialordershakenopticallatticeorbitalFloquetbandtime-reversalsymmetrybreakingIsingtransitionquantumgas
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports an experimental observation of vestigial order melting in a quantum gas. In a shaken one-dimensional optical lattice, rubidium atoms form a chiral superfluid that condenses into one of two degenerate valleys, breaking both the $U(1)$ phase symmetry and a time-reversal $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry. The authors show that heating does not destroy both orders at once: the time-reversal symmetry is restored first, at an Ising transition temperature $T_m$, leaving a vestigial paramagnetic superfluid that still has phase coherence; only at a higher temperature $T_c$ does the superfluid itself disappear. Across every shaking frequency they explored, $T_m$ stays below $T_c$, and the intermediate paramagnetic-superfluid window widens as the valley separation is increased by driving closer to resonance. This is evidence that thermal fluctuations can produce a sequential, rather than simultaneous, melting of intertwined orders, with a vestigial phase surviving between the two transitions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Floquet-engineered double-valley band: lattice shaking superposes $s$- and $p$-orbital states so that the effective ground band has two degenerate minima at $\pm k_0$, whose separation grows as the driving frequency approaches the $s$–$p$ gap. Low-energy physics is described by a two-component field theory for fluctuations at the two valleys, with intravalley and intervalley couplings whose ground state minimizes interaction energy by condensing into one valley. The Ising transition is diagnosed by the momentum-space valley asymmetry $m$ (Eq. 4) and its run-to-run variance $O$ (Eq. 5), fit to a power-law form (Eq. 8) to locate $T_m$; the superfluid transition is located by extrapolating the condensate fraction $f_c$ to zero (Eq. 9).

What would settle it

Recompute the asymmetry order parameter from the raw valley populations without normalizing by total density, or restrict the analysis to atoms inside the condensate peaks; if its fluctuations vanish at the same temperature where the condensate fraction extrapolates to zero, then the reported $T_m < T_c$ ordering and the intermediate paramagnetic superfluid are artifacts of the normalization rather than a real vestigial phase.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using $^{87}$Rb atoms in a shaken one-dimensional optical lattice, the experiment creates a Floquet band whose lowest dispersion has two degenerate minima at $\pm k_0$, formed by hybridizing $s$- and $p$-orbital states. At low temperature, condensation into a single valley produces a chiral superfluid with a real-space phase winding, breaking the $U(1)$ phase symmetry and the time-reversal $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry. The central claim is that heating melts this state in two clearly separated steps, not one: at $T_m = 165(40)$ nK for the main driving frequency, the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry is restored—atoms populate both valleys equally—while condensate coherence persists; the condensate fraction only vanishes at the higher $T_c = 315(11)$ nK. The authors find $T_m < T_c$ throughout the investigated range of shaking frequencies, with $T_m$ suppressed near resonance while $T_c$ remains almost unchanged, so the paramagnetic-superfluid window grows with $k_0$. Far from resonance the two transitions merge within error, consistent with a vestigial-order melting scenario rather than a single first-order simultaneous transition.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the run-to-run variance of the valley-asymmetry parameter is governed by the time-reversal symmetry-restoring transition, even though that parameter is normalized by total density and therefore also shrinks as the condensate fraction drops with temperature.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the explored regime, heating always restores time-reversal symmetry before superfluidity, so a paramagnetic superfluid with equal valley populations exists between $T_m$ and $T_c$.
  • Tuning the shaking frequency toward resonance (larger $k_0$) suppresses $T_m$ while leaving $T_c$ nearly constant, systematically widening the vestigial-order window; far from resonance the two transitions merge within error.
  • The shaken-lattice superfluid transition temperature is lower than in the static lattice, consistent with the effective halving of phase-space density when the condensate is distributed over two minima.
  • The dependence of $T_m$ on valley separation is attributed to a reduction of the effective local interaction as the $p$-orbital fraction of the Floquet band increases.
  • The observed two-step melting provides a finite-temperature realization of vestigial order in a multi-orbital superfluid, offering a controlled setting for studying intertwined symmetry breaking.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper lists a chiral thermal state as an alternative melting route but does not observe it; the same Floquet platform might reach that route by tuning parameters in the opposite direction, which would constitute a separate test of the vestigial scenario.
  • A direct measurement of first-order coherence inside the intermediate window—not just the condensate fraction—would confirm that the paramagnetic superfluid truly carries phase coherence after the valley choice has been erased.
  • The systematic widening of the window with $k_0$ suggests that larger valley separation generically stabilizes partial symmetry breaking; a quantitative prediction of $T_m(k_0)$ from the two-valley field theory would be a natural theoretical follow-up.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental study of a Floquet-engineered double-valley band structure realized with 87Rb bosons in a shaken one-dimensional optical lattice. The authors measure two transition temperatures: an Ising-like transition T_m associated with the restoration of time-reversal (Z2) symmetry, extracted from the variance O of a momentum-space asymmetry m defined in Eq. (4), and the superfluid transition T_c extracted from the condensate fraction f_c. They report T_m ≈ 165 nK and T_c ≈ 315 nK at a shaking frequency of 12.55 kHz, and, by varying the frequency, they find that T_m decreases as the valley separation k0 increases while T_c remains roughly constant, which they interpret as a two-step melting of the chiral superfluid into a paramagnetic superfluid and then into a normal phase. The paper includes supplementary fits and a discussion of the effective field theory, and the data are available on Zenodo.

Significance. The platform and measurement are interesting: a shaken-lattice double-valley system with an s-p hybridized band is a clean setting to look for vestigial order in a bosonic superfluid, and the paper provides a full phase diagram with bootstrap error bars, publicly archived data, and several cross-checks of the fits (Supplementary Fig. S5). If the two-step melting scenario is confirmed, it would be a notable demonstration of fluctuation-driven vestigial order in an ultracold atomic gas, relevant to multi-orbital superconductivity. The effective field theory is used only for motivation, and the experimental measurement of T_c is independent of the specific form of g2≈4g1, so there is no circularity in the determination of the transition temperatures.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2, Eqs. (4)-(5) and Methods Eq. (8)] The order parameter m defined in Eq. (4) is normalized by the total momentum-space density. If the momentum distribution is decomposed as n(kx)=n_th(kx)+n_cond(kx) with a symmetric thermal background and condensate peaks at ±k0, then m ≈ (N_+ - N_-)/N_tot = f_c z, where f_c is the condensate fraction and z=(N_+ - N_-)/(N_+ + N_-) is the valley imbalance of the condensed fraction. Consequently the variance O = Var(m) ≈ f_c^2 Var(z) up to subleading thermal terms. Since f_c(T) decreases monotonically and vanishes at T_c≈315 nK, the measured O carries a temperature-dependent prefactor f_c^2 that is unrelated to Z2 restoration. The fitted T_m=165(40) nK (Eq. (8)) therefore cannot be interpreted as the Z2 transition temperature without first removing this prefactor; the same confound affects the polynomial, exponential, and power-law fits in Supplementary Fig. S5. I request a valley-resolved reanalysis: define z from the populations of the two condensate peaks and extract the transition from Var(z) directly, or fit O(T) with an explicit f_c(T)^2 factor. Without this, the central claim that T_m < T_c and that the intermediate paramagnetic superfluid window widens with k0 is not supported by the presented data.
  2. [§2 (TOF data analysis)] The text states that the data analysis applies a 3σ rule to remove outliers before computing O. Near a spontaneous Z2 symmetry-breaking transition, the shot-to-shot distribution of m is bimodal, and the very shots with large fluctuations of m are the ones that carry the symmetry-breaking signal. If the outlier criterion is applied to quantities correlated with m (e.g., total density or peak visibility), it risks removing the bimodal tails that dominate the variance O, thereby suppressing the measured O and biasing T_m downward. Please demonstrate that the reported T_m is stable with respect to the outlier threshold, for example by repeating the fits without the 3σ cut or with 2σ and 4σ thresholds.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2] There is a typo in the main text: 'More detials' should be 'More details'.
  2. [Abstract and Discussion] The symmetry group is stated inconsistently: the abstract says 'U(1) and time-reversal Z2', while the Discussion says 'U(1)×U(1) and time-reversal Z2'. Please clarify which symmetry group is actually broken and restored at each transition.
  3. [Fig. 3(b)] The left and right axes for the shaken and static condensate fractions are easy to confuse; consider using two panels or placing the curves on the same axis with clear labels.
  4. [Methods, Eq. (4)] In the definition of m, please specify that the integral is over the first Brillouin zone and that n(kx) is the momentum distribution integrated over transverse momenta; also state the value of sgn(kx) at kx=0.
  5. [Data availability] The data are deposited on Zenodo, which is good; adding the analysis code would further support reproducibility and allow the requested reanalysis to be performed by the community.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the transition temperatures are obtained by direct fits to experimental observables, and the cited effective-field theory is used only for interpretation, not as the source of the measured values.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental observation: the chiral superfluid melts in two steps, with the Ising transition temperature Tm below the superfluid transition temperature Tc. Tm is extracted by fitting the measured variance O of the asymmetry order parameter m to a truncated power law (Eq. 8), and Tc is extracted by fitting the measured condensate fraction fc and extrapolating to fc = 0 (Eq. 9). These are empirical fits to experimental data, not quantities derived from the effective field theory. The theory in Eqs. (1)-(2), attributed to Ref. [13], and the relation g2≈4g1 from Ref. [25] only frame possible scenarios; Ref. [13] explicitly allows either melting order, so the experiment decides between them. The explanation of the Tm(k0) trend via a reduced local interaction U in Supplementary Section S-4 is a post hoc interpretation, not a prediction that feeds back into the measured temperatures. Self-citations (e.g., Ref. [13] includes corresponding author X. Li) are present but not load-bearing: the data and fits are contained in the paper and deposited on Zenodo. The skeptic's concern that the density-normalized order parameter O contains a condensate-fraction factor is a potential measurement-validity issue, but it is not a circularity in the derivation chain, because the paper does not use the theory to compute O or to force Tm < Tc. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained with respect to the central experimental claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on measured transition temperatures, not a parameter-free derivation. The modeling relies on the effective field theory (Eqs. 1-2) and phenomenological fits (Eqs. 8-9), with free exponents and a hand-chosen outlier threshold. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • β_Ising = not reported
    Free exponent in the power-law fit of the Ising order parameter O (Eq. 8); not fixed to the 3D Ising value.
  • β_fc = not reported
    Free exponent in the condensate fraction fit (Eq. 9); not fixed to the ideal-gas value of 3.
  • α_fc = not reported
    Prefactor in the condensate fraction fit (Eq. 9).
  • 3σ outlier threshold = 3
    Outlier removal threshold for TOF data, chosen without pre-registration; affects the analyzed data set.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Effective low-energy theory with contact interactions and g2≈4g1 (Eq. 2)
    Adopted from prior work (Refs. [13,25]); used to argue the ground state is a single-valley chiral condensate.
  • domain assumption Thermal equilibrium reached after ramp and hold (T_rise=80 ms, T_hold=20 ms)
    No direct check of equilibration is provided; the analysis assumes the sample is in a thermal state.
  • ad hoc to paper Condensate fraction follows the phenomenological form of Eq. (9) with free α and β
    The fit function is used to extrapolate to f_c=0 to define T_c; the exponent is not derived from theory.
  • ad hoc to paper Order parameter O follows a truncated power-law (Eq. 8)
    The fit assumes a power-law approach to zero with free exponent; S5 shows other functions give similar T_m, but the normalization issue is not addressed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Vestigial Order Melting of a Chiral Atomic Superfluid in a Double-Valley Optical Lattice." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3MNIQEMM

@misc{pith2026250707494,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Vestigial Order Melting of a Chiral Atomic Superfluid in a Double-Valley Optical Lattice},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3MNIQEMM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07494}
}
abstract

The interplay of multiple symmetry-breaking channels plays an important role in shaping complex phase diagrams in many-body systems. In multicomponent superfluids, this interplay can generate fluctuation-driven vestigial order relevant to unconventional superconductivity. Here we investigate thermal phase transitions in a Floquet-engineered double-valley band structure realized with ultracold bosons in a shaken optical lattice. The system possesses U(1) and time-reversal $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetries, and forms, at low temperature, a chiral superfluid in which Bose-Einstein condensation occurs in a single valley, and the condensate wavefunction develops a real space phase winding. Upon heating, the chiral superfluid melts in two steps: first into a time-reversal-symmetric superfluid and then into a normal phase. By measuring the superfluid and Ising transition temperatures across a range of driving frequencies, we find that the superfluid transition temperature remains higher than the Ising transition temperature throughout the explored regime. Near resonance, the Ising transition temperature is suppressed, whereas the superfluid transition temperature is nearly unchanged; far from resonance, the two transitions merge. These results reveal how thermal and quantum fluctuations govern symmetry breaking in periodically driven quantum many-body systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Magnetic Field Induced Band Deformation in a Lieb Lattice:Aharonov-Bohm Caging and Zeeman Splitting

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2025-08 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    Spin-resolved flat bands in a magnetized Lieb lattice are simply the zero-field bands shifted by ±Bz, because the Hamiltonian is block diagonal in spin.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Hobbs, J., Gibb, C.J., Mandle, R.J.: Ferri- and ferro-electric switching in spon- taneously chiral polar liquid crystals. Nat. Commun.16(1), 7510 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62684-z 7

  2. [2]

    Liu, K., Nissinen, J., Slager, R.-J., Wu, K., Zaanen, J.: Generalized liquid crystals: Giant fluctuations and the vestigial chiral order ofi,o, andtmatter. Phys. Rev. X6, 041025 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041025

  3. [3]

    Science368(6491), 642–648 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz7949 https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aaz7949

    Jiang, W., Qu, Z.-b., Kumar, P., Vecchio, D., Wang, Y., Ma, Y., Bahng, J.H., Bernardino, K., Gomes, W.R., Colombari, F.M., Lozada-Blanco, A., Veksler, M., Marino, E., Simon, A., Murray, C., Muniz, S.R., Moura, A.F., Kotov, N.A.: Emergence of complexity in hierarchically organized chiral parti- cles. Science368(6491), 642–648 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1126...

  4. [4]

    Horiuchi, S., Yamaguchi, T., Tessarolo, J., Tanaka, H., Sakuda, E., Arikawa, Y., Meggers, E., Clever, G.H., Umakoshi, K.: Symmetry-breaking host–guest assem- bly in a hydrogen-bonded supramolecular system. Nat. Commun.14(1), 155 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-35850-4

  5. [5]

    Wang, Y., Wu, H., McCandless, G.T., Chan, J.Y., Ali, M.N.: Quantum states and intertwining phases in kagome materials. Nat. Rev. Phys.5(11), 635–658 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00635-7

  6. [6]

    Fernandes, R.M., Orth, P.P., Schmalian, J.: Intertwined vestigial order in quan- tum materials: Nematicity and beyond. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 133–154 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013200

  7. [7]

    Cho, C.-w., Shen, J., Lyu, J., Atanov, O., Chen, Q., Lee, S.H., Hor, Y.S., Gawry- luk, D.J., Pomjakushina, E., Bartkowiak, M., Hecker, M., Schmalian, J., Lortz, R.: Z3-vestigial nematic order due to superconducting fluctuations in the doped topological insulators nbxbi2se3 and cuxbi2se3. Nat. Commun.11(1), 3056 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16871-9

  8. [8]

    Li, X., Liu, W.V.: Physics of higher orbital bands in optical lattices: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys.79(11), 116401 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/ 11/116401

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Dutta, O., Gajda, M., Hauke, P., Lewenstein, M., L¨ uhmann, D.-S., Malomed, B.A., Sowi´ nski, T., Zakrzewski, J.: Non-standard hubbard models in optical lat- tices: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys.78(6), 066001 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0034-4885/78/6/066001

  2. [10]

    Stewart, G.R.: Superconductivity in iron compounds. Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1589– 1652 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1589

  3. [11]

    Science 288(5465), 462–468 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5465.462

    Tokura, Y., Nagaosa, N.: Orbital physics in transition-metal oxides. Science 288(5465), 462–468 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5465.462

  4. [12]

    Nie, L., Tarjus, G., Kivelson, S.A.: Quenched disorder and vestigial nematicity in the pseudogap regime of the cuprates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.111(22), 7980–7985 8 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1406019111

  5. [13]

    Li, X., Paramekanti, A., Hemmerich, A., Liu, W.V.: Proposed formation and dynamical signature of a chiral bose liquid in an optical lattice. Nat. Commun. 5(1), 3205 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4205

  6. [14]

    Fradkin, E., Kivelson, S.A., Tranquada, J.M.: Colloquium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 457–482 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.87.457

  7. [15]

    Agterberg, D.F., Davis, J.C.S., Edkins, S.D., Fradkin, E., Van Harlingen, D.J., Kivelson, S.A., Lee, P.A., Radzihovsky, L., Tranquada, J.M., Wang, Y.: The physics of pair-density waves: Cuprate superconductors and beyond. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.11, 231–270 (2020) http...

  8. [16]

    How, P.T., Yip, S.K.: Absence of ginzburg-landau mechanism for vestigial order in the normal phase above a two-component superconductor. Phys. Rev. B107, 104514 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.104514

  9. [17]

    Maccari, I., Babaev, E., Carlstr¨ om, J.: Revisiting vestigial order in nematic super- conductors: Gauge-field mechanisms and model constraints. Phys. Rev. B113, 014501 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1103/gccc-rfw4

  10. [18]

    Platt, C., Hanke, W., Thomale, R.: Functional renormalization group for multi- orbital fermi surface instabilities. Adv. Phys.62(4-6), 453–562 (2013) https:// doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2013.862020

  11. [19]

    Jin, S., Zhang, W., Guo, X., Chen, X., Zhou, X., Li, X.: Evidence of potts-nematic superfluidity in a hexagonalsp 2 optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 035301 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.035301

  12. [20]

    Nature 596(7871), 227–231 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03702-0

    Wang, X.-Q., Luo, G.-Q., Liu, J.-Y., Liu, W.V., Hemmerich, A., Xu, Z.-F.: Evidence for an atomic chiral superfluid with topological excitations. Nature 596(7871), 227–231 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03702-0

  13. [21]

    Kiefer, Y., Hachmann, M., Hemmerich, A.: Ultracold feshbach molecules in an orbital optical lattice. Nat. Phys.19(6), 794–799 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-023-01994-9

  14. [22]

    Tsuei, C.C., Kirtley, J.R.: Pairing symmetry in cuprate superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys.72, 969–1016 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.72.969

  15. [23]

    Lechermann, F.: Multiorbital processes rule the nd 1−xsrxnio2 normal state. Phys. Rev. X10, 041002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041002

  16. [24]

    Wirth, G., ¨Olschl¨ ager, M., Hemmerich, A.: Evidence for orbital superfluidity in 9 the p-band of a bipartite optical square lattice. Nat. Phys.7(2), 147–153 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1857

  17. [25]

    Parker, C.V., Ha, L.-C., Chin, C.: Direct observation of effective ferromagnetic domains of cold atoms in a shaken optical lattice. Nat. Phys.9(12), 769–774 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2789

  18. [26]

    Khamehchi, M.A., Qu, C., Mossman, M.E., Zhang, C., Engels, P.: Spin- momentum coupled bose-einstein condensates with lattice band pseudospins. Nat. Commun.7(1), 10867 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10867

  19. [27]

    M¨ uller, T., F¨ olling, S., Widera, A., Bloch, I.: State preparation and dynamics of ultracold atoms in higher lattice orbitals. Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 200405 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.200405

  20. [28]

    Minguzzi, J., Zhu, Z., Sandholzer, K., Walter, A.-S., Viebahn, K., Esslinger, T.: Topological pumping in a floquet-bloch band. Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 053201 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.053201

  21. [29]

    Zheng, W., Liu, B., Miao, J., Chin, C., Zhai, H.: Strong interaction effects and criticality of bosons in shaken optical lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 155303 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.155303

  22. [30]

    Science354(6312), 606– 610 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf9657

    Clark, L.W., Feng, L., Chin, C.: Universal space-time scaling symmetry in the dynamics of bosons across a quantum phase transition. Science354(6312), 606– 610 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf9657

  23. [31]

    Wang, X.-Q., Luo, G.-Q., Liu, J.-Y., Huang, G.-H., Li, Z.-X., Wu, C., Hemmerich, A., Xu, Z.-F.: Evidence for quantum stripe ordering in a triangular optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 226001 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131. 226001

  24. [32]

    Soltan-Panahi, P., L¨ uhmann, D.-S., Struck, J., Windpassinger, P., Sengstock, K.: Quantum phase transition to unconventional multi-orbital superfluidity in optical lattices. Nat. Phys.8(1), 71–75 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2128

  25. [33]

    Clark, L.W., Anderson, B.M., Feng, L., Gaj, A., Levin, K., Chin, C.: Observation of density-dependent gauge fields in a bose-einstein condensate based on micro- motion control in a shaken two-dimensional lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 030402 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysR...

  26. [34]

    Sun, J., Liao, R., Zhao, P., Hu, Z., Wang, Z., Liu, X.-J., Zhou, X., Chen, X.: A quantitative study of the micromotion of a p-band superfluid in a shaking lattice. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.56(9), 095302 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-6455/acc4f9

  27. [35]

    How, P.T., Yip, S.: Superfluid transition of a ferromagnetic bose gas. Phys. Rev. 10 Res.6, 022030 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L022030

  28. [36]

    Nature406(6796), 587–592 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1038/35020500

    Saxena, S.S., Agarwal, P., Ahilan, K., Grosche, F.M., Haselwimmer, R.K.W., Steiner, M.J., Pugh, E., Walker, I.R., Julian, S.R., Monthoux, P., Lonzarich, G.G., Huxley, A., Sheikin, I., Braithwaite, D., Flouquet, J.: Superconductivity on the border of itinerant-electron ferromag...

  29. [37]

    Nature413(6856), 613–616 (2001)

    Aoki, D., Huxley, A., Ressouche, E., Braithwaite, D., Flouquet, J., Brison, J.-P., Lhotel, E., Paulsen, C.: Coexistence of superconductivity and ferromagnetism in urhge. Nature413(6856), 613–616 (2001)

  30. [38]

    Hasenbusch, M.: Finite size scaling study of lattice models in the three- dimensional ising universality class. Phys. Rev. B82, 174433 (2010) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.174433

  31. [39]

    Ensher, J.R., Jin, D.S., Matthews, M.R., Wieman, C.E., Cornell, E.A.: Bose- einstein condensation in a dilute gas: Measurement of energy and ground-state occupation. Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 4984–4987 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.77.4984

  32. [40]

    Gerbier, F., Thywissen, J.H., Richard, S., Hugbart, M., Bouyer, P., Aspect, A.: Experimental study of the thermodynamics of an interacting trapped bose- einstein condensed gas. Phys. Rev. A70, 013607 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.70.013607

  33. [41]

    Yu, Z., Tian, J., Peng, P., Mao, D., Chen, X., Zhou, X.: Transport of ultracold atoms in superpositions ofs- andd-band states in a moving optical lattice. Phys. Rev. A107, 023303 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.023303

  34. [42]

    Yin, G., Kong, L., Yu, Z., Tian, J., Chen, X., Zhou, X.: Time bound of atomic adiabatic evolution in an accelerated optical lattice. Phys. Rev. A108, 033310 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.033310

  35. [43]

    Wintersperger, K., Braun, C., ¨Unal, F.N., Eckardt, A., Liberto, M.D., Goldman, N., Bloch, I., Aidelsburger, M.: Realization of an anomalous floquet topological system with ultracold atoms. Nat. Phys.16(10), 1058–1063 (2020) https://doi. org/10.1038/s41567-020-0949-y

  36. [44]

    Choi, D.-I., Niu, Q.: Bose-einstein condensates in an optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 2022–2025 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2022

  37. [45]

    Physica B405(17), 3766–3769 (2010) https://doi.org/10

    Hassan, A.S.: General behavior for the condensation of an interacting bose gas in an 1d optical lattice. Physica B405(17), 3766–3769 (2010) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.physb.2010.05.083 11

  38. [46]

    Griesmaier, A., Werner, J., Hensler, S., Stuhler, J., Pfau, T.: Bose-einstein con- densation of chromium. Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 160401 (2005) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.94.160401

  39. [47]

    Yu, Z., Wu, C., Zhang, C., Li, X., Zhou, X.: Vestigial order melting of a chi- ral atomic superfluid in a double-valley optical lattice https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.19562635

  40. [48]

    Giorgini, S., Pitaevskii, L.P., Stringari, S.: Thermodynamics of a trapped bose- condensed gas. J. Low Temp. Phys.109(1), 309–355 (1997) https://doi.org/10. 1007/BF02396737

  41. [49]

    Grossmann, S., Holthaus, M.: On bose-einstein condensation in harmonic traps. Phys. Lett. A208(3), 188–192 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(95) 00766-V

  42. [50]

    Giorgini, S., Pitaevskii, L.P., Stringari, S.: Condensate fraction and critical tem- perature of a trapped interacting bose gas. Phys. Rev. A54, 4633–4636 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.54.R4633 12 6 Acknowledgements We thank Cheng Chin, Xiongjun Liu, Hepeng Yao and Y...

  43. [51]

    Considering the nonlinear contributions from interactions, the theoreticalp- band ratioR p may increase [26, 29], leading to larger reduction ofU

    The theory of last section relies on the single-particle approximation. Considering the nonlinear contributions from interactions, the theoreticalp- band ratioR p may increase [26, 29], leading to larger reduction ofU. 20 Fig. S4 The variation of local interactionUwithp-band r...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.