Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 8 minor 1 cited by

Restoring Missing Modes of 21cm Intensity Mapping with Deep Learning: Impact on BAO Reconstruction

T0 review · 4 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that a U-Net trained on simulated 21cm intensity maps can restore Fourier modes lost to foreground contamination, reaching about 0.9 cross-correlation with the true field at $k \sim 1\,h/\mathrm{Mpc}$, and that this…

desk verdict Useful U-Net mode-restoration study, but the abstract's BAO claim lacks the no-AI baseline needed to support it. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04021 v2 pith:3Q5MR2IC submitted 2024-12-05 astro-ph.CO

Qian Li , Xin Wang , Xiaodong Li , Jiacheng Ding , Tiancheng Luan , Xiaolin Luo This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords 21cmintensitymappingforegroundwedgemoderecoverydeeplearningU-NetbaryonacousticoscillationsBAOreconstructionscaleinvariance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper addresses a practical obstacle in 21cm intensity mapping: foreground contamination removes a wedge-shaped region of Fourier modes, and those missing modes degrade the BAO reconstruction algorithms that would 'linearize' the acoustic signal. It proposes training a U-Net deep-learning model on simulated 21cm temperature cubes to regenerate the missing modes from the surviving modes, exploiting the non-linear mode coupling of structure formation. The paper reports that the AI-restored maps reach a cross-correlation ratio of roughly 0.9 with the true signal at $k \sim 1\,h/\mathrm{Mpc}$, and that running BAO reconstruction on these restored maps yields a linearized BAO signal very close to that obtained with all modes present. It also finds that a model trained on coarse $128^3$ grids transfers successfully to finer $256^3$ and $320^3$ maps, with even higher correlation, a behavior the authors attribute to the scale invariance of non-linear mode coupling and U-Net's hierarchical architecture. A sympathetic reader would care because the method offers a way to salvage the information lost to the foreground wedge before performing precision cosmology with BAO.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is non-linear gravitational mode coupling: structure formation mixes Fourier modes, so the observed modes outside the foreground wedge contain information about the modes that are missing. The U-Net, a fully convolutional encoder-decoder with skip connections, is trained in configuration space, where the coupling is more local than in Fourier space, to map the masked temperature cube to the full temperature cube using a mean-squared-error loss; it is the instrument that learns that coupling. The BAO reconstruction is a particle-based iterative solver of the continuity equation that estimates the displacement field by successive Zel'dovich steps and produces a reconstructed density field whose BAO signal is closer to linear theory. The diagnostics are the cross-correlation ratio $r(k)$ between restored and true fields and the fitted smearing parameter $\Sigma$, which measures how much of the BAO signal remains damped.

What would settle it

Feed an observed or hydrodynamically simulated 21cm datacube that includes beam, thermal noise, and residual foregrounds through the trained U-Net, mask the same wedge, and compare the restored modes against independently measured modes from a cross-correlation tracer; if the cross-correlation ratio in the wedge falls well below 0.9 or the recovered BAO peak shifts by more than the statistical error, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that missing Fourier modes caused by the intrinsic foreground and the foreground wedge in 21cm intensity mapping can be recovered by a U-Net trained in configuration space, and that the recovered field is faithful enough for BAO reconstruction to perform essentially as well as if no modes were missing. Quantitatively, the cross-correlation ratio between the AI-restored temperature field and the true field is about 0.9 at $k \sim 1\,h/\mathrm{Mpc}$, exceeding the scale range where the BAO reconstruction algorithm is effective. After applying a particle-based iterative BAO reconstruction, the BAO signal extracted from the AI-restored map closely tracks the signal from the full-mode map, and the fitted nonlinear-smearing parameter $\Sigma$ is reduced from about 8.33 without reconstruction to about 3.20 with it, showing that reconstruction still sharpens the BAO. A further claim is scale transfer: a U-Net trained on coarser grids generalizes to finer grids, with correlation improving at higher resolution, consistent with the scale invariance of the mode-coupling kernels of perturbation theory.

Load-bearing premise

The whole result rests on the assumption that the simulated 21cm maps produced by COLA simulations plus the empirical HI prescription reproduce the real non-linear mode coupling of the 21cm field closely enough that the values learned on them transfer to observations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Foreground avoidance plus U-Net restoration recovers the Fourier modes inside the wedge well enough that subsequent BAO reconstruction behaves like a full-mode map.
  • A U-Net trained at one resolution transfers to finer grids, so low-resolution simulations can serve higher-resolution observations, reducing the computational cost of training data.
  • The restored-field correlation ratio reaches about 0.9 at $k \sim 1\,h/\mathrm{Mpc}$, beyond the roughly $0.6\,h/\mathrm{Mpc}$ range where BAO reconstruction is effective, so the restored modes are usable for BAO analysis.
  • AI restoration introduces only mild shape distortions, which the polynomial transfer function in the BAO template absorbs; BAO reconstruction itself introduces larger shape distortion.
  • Training on noiseless maps with a perfectly known mask means that applying the method to real observations will require retraining with beam, noise, and residual foregrounds included.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the observed scale invariance holds more broadly, the same network could be applied across surveys with different pixel scales or at even finer resolution without retraining, potentially easing the demand for very large high-resolution simulations.
  • The same mode-restoration logic could be transferred to other Fourier-space data-loss problems in 21cm cosmology, such as the Epoch of Reionization window or radio frequency interference excision, where non-linear mode coupling also entangles lost and observed modes.
  • A direct observational test would be to compare the network's restored wedge modes with modes measured by an overlapping galaxy redshift survey; a high cross-correlation would validate phase recovery on real data rather than simulated data.
  • One could go beyond the paper's diagonal-covariance fit and use the restored maps to estimate a sound-horizon distance error bar, quantifying how much the AI restoration tightens BAO constraints relative to foreground avoidance alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper presents a U-Net-based method to restore Fourier modes of 21cm intensity mapping maps that are lost to foreground avoidance (intrinsic foreground k_parallel < 0.1 h/Mpc and the foreground wedge). The training data are COLA simulations with an empirical HI prescription and subgrid modeling, augmented by rotations, with an 80/10/10 train/validation/test split. The authors evaluate the restored maps by visual inspection, power spectra, and the cross-correlation ratio r(k), reporting r ~ 0.9 at k ~ 1 h/Mpc for the finest grids, and they further study the impact on particle-based BAO reconstruction by comparing BAO signatures and fitting the smearing parameter Sigma from an MCMC analysis. The paper also claims that a model trained at 256^3 can be applied to 320^3 with improved correlation, attributing this to scale invariance of nonlinear mode coupling.

Significance. The potential significance is real: if the method robustly recovers the information needed for BAO reconstruction, it would offer a practical way to use foreground-avoided 21cm data without discarding the wedge. The paper has several strengths: it uses a held-out test set, presents quantitative 2D and 1D correlation metrics, applies a realistic BAO reconstruction pipeline, and explicitly discusses limitations of the HI modeling and the absence of beam/noise/residual foregrounds in the training. However, the central claim regarding 'mitigating the impact of foreground contamination' on BAO reconstruction is not supported by the current analysis because the BAO pipeline is never applied to the foreground-masked map without AI restoration. The scale-transfer claim is also partially confounded by the two-stage retraining. These issues are addressable in revision, so the paper warrants major revision rather than rejection.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.2, Figure 6] The central claim that AI restoration 'mitigates the impact of foreground contamination' on BAO reconstruction requires a comparison between BAO reconstruction applied to the foreground-masked map (Observed Tb) and the AI-restored map. None of the panels in Figure 6 shows the observed mode-missing field entering the BAO pipeline; dashed 'Observed Tb' curves appear only in the correlation-ratio plots of Figure 5. Without this no-AI baseline, the result cannot distinguish 'the missing modes never mattered' from 'AI restoration helps' or even 'AI restoration hurts.' Please run the same particle-based BAO reconstruction and Sigma-fitting on the mode-missing observed map and present it alongside the true and AI-restored results.
  2. [Section 4.2, Figure 6(d) and Appendix A] The fitted smearing parameter is quoted as Sigma = 8.33 without BAO reconstruction and Sigma = 3.20 with BAO reconstruction, but the text states that the one-sigma error on Sigma is quite large, and the corner plots show non-Gaussianity. The claim that BAO reconstruction reduces nonlinear smearing and that AI restoration has minimal impact needs quantitative error bars on Sigma, ideally from the MCMC chains, so the reader can judge whether the differences are significant.
  3. [Section 3.4, covariance estimate] The chi-squared fitting is said to use 'the diagonal components of the covariance matrix ... computed using our original 37 simulated training samples.' If the field used for the BAO analysis (e.g., the 256^3 field in Figure 6) is part of the same 37 realizations, the covariance is not independent of the data being fit. Please clarify whether the covariance is computed from the training split only, and if not, recompute it excluding the test field.
  4. [Sections 3.2 and 4.1, Figures 2 and 5] The abstract's claim that a model trained on coarser fields can be effectively applied to finer fields is partially confounded by the two-stage training procedure. The 256^3 and 320^3 results are obtained with the stage-two model retrained at 256^3, not with the original stage-one model trained at 128^3, and the text notes that the stage-one model showed amplitude deviations on higher-resolution maps. Please show explicitly which model is applied to each resolution, and if possible include the stage-one model's performance at 256^3 to separate retraining gains from genuine scale transfer.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Abstract and Section 5] 'Proving the effectiveness' is too strong for an idealized simulation with no beam, noise, or residual foregrounds; consider 'demonstrating' or 'indicating'.
  2. [Section 2, Eq. (2.3)] The choice theta_FOV = pi/2 covers an extremely wide primary beam; please justify this value or discuss its effect on the size of the wedge and the difficulty of the restoration task.
  3. [Section 3.1, Eq. (3.2)] 'Viralized' should be 'virialized'.
  4. [Section 3.3] 'Cloud-in-Cloud algorithm' is likely a typo for 'Cloud-in-Cell' (CIC) mass assignment.
  5. [Section 4.2, Figure 6(c) caption] The red solid line is described as showing that BAO reconstruction alone introduces significantly greater shape deviations; the text also says the sky-blue line in panel (c) is identical to panel (b), which is not immediately clear from the figure. Please make the repeated curves explicit in the caption.
  6. [References [39] and [73]] References [39] and [73] are the same paper (Schmittfull, Baldauf, Zaldarriaga 2017); please merge or cite once.
  7. [Figure 5 legend] The 'Observed Tb(mode missing)' entries are repeated four times; simplify the legend to avoid clutter.
  8. [Section 5] 'There are many systematic effects could potential affect' should be '...could potentially affect'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor self-referential baseline in Figure 6(a), but the central BAO evaluation uses an unprocessed template; no significant circularity.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.4, Eq. (3.9); Figure 6, panel (a)]
    "To examine the performance of our AI model under the most idealized conditions, we first process both P_BAO and its corresponding P_nwig through our AI restoration and BAO reconstruction pipeline. This allows us to establish a baseline for evaluating the performance of the combined AI restoration and BAO reconstruction procedure."

    Equation (3.9) defines S_BAO as (P_BAO - P_nwig)/P_nwig. When both the BAO spectrum and its seed-matched no-wiggle spectrum are passed through the same AI-restoration and BAO-reconstruction operators, any smooth multiplicative or shape distortion introduced by those operators cancels in the ratio. The panel-(a) agreement between the AI-restored and true BAO signals is therefore partly a consequence of this common normalization, not an independent measurement of how much AI restoration changes the BAO signal.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is not circular. The U-Net is an empirical regression trained on simulated 21cm maps with a proper train/validation/test split, and its correlation with the true field is measured on held-out realizations. The BAO analysis that supports the abstract's 'minimal impact' claim is ultimately based on the template fit of Eq. (3.10)-(3.12), where the no-wiggle template has not undergone AI restoration or BAO reconstruction, so the fitted smearing parameter Sigma is not defined in terms of the AI output. The self-referential panel (a) is explicitly labeled a baseline and is acknowledged by the authors as not sufficient on its own. The missing no-AI 'observed/mode-missing' curve through the BAO pipeline is a control/completeness gap rather than a circular reduction, and the acknowledged COLA/HI modeling limitations concern transferability, not circularity. Self-citations to the authors' earlier reconstruction papers are descriptive and not load-bearing; the reconstruction code adopted is from an external reference. Accordingly, the circularity score is low: one self-referential normalization that is not central to the paper's main quantitative conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on a set of domain assumptions about the fidelity of the simulated 21cm field and the known shape of the foreground mask, plus several fitted nuisance parameters used in the BAO evaluation. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • k_int (intrinsic foreground cut) = 0.1 h/Mpc
    Chosen as 'reasonable' in Section 2; sets the size of the missing-mode region the U-Net must restore.
  • theta_FOV (field of view) = pi/2
    Adopted in Section 2 to define the foreground wedge boundary; larger or smaller values change the mask.
  • Tbar_HI b_T de-bias factor = measured from simulations, averaged up to k_bcut = 0.035 h/Mpc
    Needed in Equation (3.8) to convert temperature maps into dark matter density for BAO reconstruction; estimated from the same simulations.
  • Sigma (BAO smearing parameter) = 8.33 (AI-restored, no BAO rec); 3.20 (AI-restored, with BAO rec)
    Fitted via MCMC in Section 4.2 and Appendix A; the paper uses it as the quantitative measure of BAO reconstruction effectiveness.
  • BAO template polynomial coefficients a0-a4 = e.g., a0=1.01, a1=0.25, a2=-1.41, a3=1.50, a4=3.44 for the no-BAO-rec case
    Fourth-order polynomial in Equation (3.11) fitted to absorb shape distortions.
  • U-Net training hyperparameters = learning rate 1e-3; batch size, epochs not stated
    Chosen by testing; not tied to data but affect restoration quality.
  • R_ini, iteration schedule for BAO reconstruction = R_ini=15 Mpc/h, factor sqrt(2)/2, about 9 iterations
    Smoothing scales chosen in Section 3.3; affect the reconstructed displacement field.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The foreground wedge boundary is given by Eq. (2.3) with theta_FOV=pi/2 and k_int=0.1 h/Mpc, and all modes inside are completely lost.
    Used to build the missing-mode mask in Section 2. Real wedge boundaries and residual foregrounds differ.
  • domain assumption COLA simulations at z=1 with the HI halo-mass recipe of Villaescusa-Navarro et al. reproduce the non-linear mode coupling of the real 21cm field.
    The U-Net can only learn coupling present in training data; Section 5 acknowledges COLA and HI modeling deviations.
  • domain assumption Redshift-space distortions can be modeled by shifting halos and subgrid particles with Eq. (3.1).
    Used in Section 3.1; the paper notes HI velocity bias for large halos.
  • domain assumption The BAO reconstruction algorithm solves the continuity equation Eq. (2.4) and the particle-based iterative Zel'dovich implementation is adequate.
    Section 3.3; reconstruction performance depends on this algorithm.
  • standard math The linear BAO template from CAMB and the fitted no-wiggle spectrum are valid references.
    Used in Equations (3.10)-(3.12) for BAO extraction.
  • ad hoc to paper Scale invariance of non-linear mode coupling allows a network trained at one resolution to transfer to finer grids.
    Section 4.1 and Eq. (4.1); offered as explanation for the coarse-to-fine transfer result, not independently tested.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Restoring Missing Modes of 21cm Intensity Mapping with Deep Learning: Impact on BAO Reconstruction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3Q5MR2IC

@misc{pith2026241204021,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Restoring Missing Modes of 21cm Intensity Mapping with Deep Learning: Impact on BAO Reconstruction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3Q5MR2IC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04021}
}
abstract

In 21cm intensity mapping of the large-scale structure (LSS), regions in Fourier space could be compromised by foreground contamination. In interferometric observations, this contamination, known as the foreground wedge, is exacerbated by the chromatic response of antennas, leading to substantial data loss. Meanwhile, the baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) reconstruction, which operates in configuration space to "linearize" the BAO signature, offers improved constraints on the sound horizon scale. However, missing modes within these contaminated regions can negatively impact the BAO reconstruction algorithm. To address this challenge, we employ the deep learning model U-Net to recover the lost modes before applying the BAO reconstruction algorithm. Despite hardware limitations, such as GPU memory, our results demonstrate that the AI-restored 21cm temperature map achieves a high correlation with the original signal, with a correlation ratio of approximately $0.9$ at $k \sim 1 h/Mpc$. Furthermore, subsequent BAO reconstruction indicates that the AI restoration has minimal impact on the performance of the `linearized' BAO signal, proving the effectiveness of the machine learning approach to mitigate the impact of foreground contamination. Interestingly, we demonstrate that the AI model trained on coarser fields can be effectively applied to finer fields, achieving even higher correlation. This success is likely attributable to the scale-invariance properties of non-linear mode coupling in large-scale structure and the hierarchical structure of the U-Net architecture.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Seeing Wiggles without Seeing Wiggles: BAO Recovery in 21 cm Intensity Mapping with Deep Learning

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 3D U-Net trained only on BAO-free 21 cm simulations recovers BAO wiggles from small-scale modes outside the foreground wedge, indicating physical mode coupling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Colless, G

    M. Colless, G. Dalton, S. Maddox, W. Sutherland, P. Norberg, S. Cole et al.,The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: spectra and redshifts,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society328(2001) – 17 – 1039–1063

    work page 2001

  2. [2]

    Jones, W

    D.H. Jones, W. Saunders, M. Colless, M.A. Read, Q.A. Parker, F.G. Watson et al.,The 6dF Galaxy Survey: samples, observational techniques and the first data release, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society355 (2004) 747–763

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    Drinkwater, R.J

    M.J. Drinkwater, R.J. Jurek, C. Blake, D. Woods, K.A. Pimbblet, K. Glazebrook et al.,The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: survey design and first data release, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 401(2010) 1429–1452

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Anderson, É

    L. Anderson, É. Aubourg, S. Bailey, F. Beutler, V. Bhardwaj, M. Blanton et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the Data Releases 10 and 11 Galaxy samples, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society441 (2014) 24–62

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Collaboration:, T

    D.E.S. Collaboration:, T. Abbott, F. Abdalla, J. Aleksić, S. Allam, A. Amara et al.,The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy–an overview,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society460 (2016) 1270–1299

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Collaboration, A.G

    D. Collaboration, A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, G. Aldering et al.,The Early Data Release of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, The Astronomical Journal168(2024) 58

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Ivezić, S.M

    Ž. Ivezić, S.M. Kahn, J.A. Tyson, B. Abel, E. Acosta, R. Allsman et al.,LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products,The Astrophysical Journal873(2019) 111

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Bharadwaj, B.B

    S. Bharadwaj, B.B. Nath and S.K. Sethi,Using HI to probe large scale structures at z ~ 3,Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy22(2001) 21

    work page 2001

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Battye, R.D

    R.A. Battye, R.D. Davies and J. Weller,Neutral hydrogen surveys for high redshift galaxy clusters and proto-clusters,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society355 (2004) 1339

    2004

  2. [10]

    Furlanetto, S.P

    S. Furlanetto, S.P. Oh and F. Briggs,Cosmology at Low Frequencies: The 21 cm Transition and the High-Redshift Universe,Physics Reports433 (2006) 181

    2006

  3. [11]

    Chang, U.-L

    T.-C. Chang, U.-L. Pen, K. Bandura and J.B. Peterson,An intensity map of hydrogen 21-cm emission at redshift z≈ 0.8, Nature 466(2010) 463

    2010

  4. [12]

    Morales and J.S.B

    M.F. Morales and J.S.B. Wyithe,Reionization and Cosmology with 21 cm Fluctuations,Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics48 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    Masui, E.R

    K.W. Masui, E.R. Switzer, N. Banavar, K. Bandura, C. Blake, L.-M. Calin et al.,MEASUREMENT OF 21 cm BRIGHTNESS FLUCTUATIONS AT z∼ 0.8 IN CROSS-CORRELATION, The Astrophysical Journal 763 (2013) L20

    2013

  6. [14]

    Bull, P.G

    P. Bull, P.G. Ferreira, P. Patel and M.G. Santos,Late-time cosmology with 21cm intensity mapping experiments,The Astrophysical Journal803(2015) 21

    2015

  7. [15]

    Santos, P

    M. Santos, P. Bull, D. Alonso, S. Camera, P. Ferreira, G. Bernardi et al.,Cosmology with a SKA HI intensity mapping survey, Proceedings of Science9-13-June-2014(2014)

    2014

  8. [16]

    Villaescusa-Navarro, S

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro, S. Genel, E. Castorina, A. Obuljen, D.N. Spergel, L. Hernquist et al., Ingredients for 21cm intensity mapping, The Astrophysical Journal866 (2018) 135

    2018

  9. [17]

    A.Lidz,S.R.Furlanetto,S.P.Oh,J.Aguirre,T.-C.Chang,O.Doréetal., IntensityMappingwithCarbon Monoxide Emission Lines and the Redshifted 21 cm Line, The Astrophysical Journal741 (2011) 70

    2011

  10. [18]

    Camera, M.G

    S. Camera, M.G. Santos, P.G. Ferreira and L. Ferramacho,Cosmology on Ultralarge Scales with Intensity Mapping of the Neutral Hydrogen 21 cm Emission: Limits on Primordial Non-Gaussianity, Physical Review Letters111(2013) 171302

    2013

  11. [19]

    Group, D.J

    S.K.A.C.S.W. Group, D.J. Bacon, R.A. Battye, P. Bull, S. Camera, P.G. Ferreira et al.,Cosmology with Phase 1 of the Square Kilometre Array; Red Book 2018: Technical specifications and performance forecasts,Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia37 (2020) e007. – 18 –

    2020

  12. [20]

    Wang, M.G

    J. Wang, M.G. Santos, P. Bull, K. Grainge, S. Cunnington, J. Fonseca et al.,HI intensity mapping with MeerKAT: Calibration pipeline for multi-dish autocorrelation observations,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society505(2021) 3698

    2021

  13. [21]

    Schlegel, S

    D.J. Schlegel, S. Ferraro, G. Aldering, C. Baltay, S. BenZvi, R. Besuner et al.,A Spectroscopic Road Map for Cosmic Frontier: DESI, DESI-II, Stage-5, arXiv e-prints(2022) [arXiv:2209.03585]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Collaboration, Y

    E. Collaboration, Y. Mellier, Abdurro’uf, J.A.A. Barroso, A. Achúcarro, J. Adamek et al.,Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission,arXiv e-prints(2024) [arXiv:2405.13491]

    2024

  15. [23]

    Liu and J.R

    A. Liu and J.R. Shaw,Data Analysis for Precision 21 cm Cosmology, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific132 (2020) 062001

    2020

  16. [24]

    de Oliveira-Costa, M

    A. de Oliveira-Costa, M. Tegmark, B.M. Gaensler, J. Jonas, T.L. Landecker and P. Reich,A model of diffuse Galactic radio emission from 10 MHz to 100 GHz, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 388(2008) 247 [arXiv:0802.1525]

    2008 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Zheng, M

    H. Zheng, M. Tegmark, J.S. Dillon, D.A. Kim, A. Liu, A.R. Neben et al.,An improved model of diffuse galactic radio emission from 10 MHz to 5 THz,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society464 (2017) 3486 [arXiv:1605.04920]

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Ekers and J

    R. Ekers and J. Bell,Radio Frequency Interference,Symposium - International Astronomical Union199 (2002) 498–505

    2002

  19. [27]

    J. Ding, X. Wang, U.-L. Pen and X.-D. Li,Correlation-based Beam Calibration of 21 cm Intensity Mapping, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series274 (2024) 44 [arXiv:2408.06682]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Santos, A

    M.G. Santos, A. Cooray and L. Knox,Multifrequency Analysis of 21 Centimeter Fluctuations from the Era of Reionization, The Astrophysical Journal625 (2005) 575 [astro-ph/0408515]

    2005 arXiv

  21. [29]

    A. Liu, M. Tegmark, J. Bowman, J. Hewitt and M. Zaldarriaga,An improved method for 21-cm foreground removal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society398 (2009) 401 [arXiv:0903.4890]

    2009 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Switzer, K.W

    E.R. Switzer, K.W. Masui, K. Bandura, L.-M. Calin, T.-C. Chang, X.-L. Chen et al.,Determination of z ∼ 0.8 neutral hydrogen fluctuations using the 21cm intensity mapping autocorrelation,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters434 (2013) L46–L50

    2013

  23. [31]

    Switzer, T.-C

    E.R. Switzer, T.-C. Chang, K.W. Masui, U.-L. Pen and T.C. Voytek,INTERPRETING THE UNRESOLVED INTENSITY OF COSMOLOGICALLY REDSHIFTED LINE RADIATION,The Astrophysical Journal815 (2015) 51

    2015

  24. [32]

    Bigot-Sazy, C

    M.-A. Bigot-Sazy, C. Dickinson, R.A. Battye, I.W.A. Browne, Y.-Z. Ma, B. Maffei et al.,Simulations for single-dish intensity mapping experiments,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society454 (2015) 3240

    2015

  25. [33]

    Chapman, F.B

    E. Chapman, F.B. Abdalla, G. Harker, V. Jelić, P. Labropoulos, S. Zaroubi et al.,Foreground Removal using FastICA: A Showcase of LOFAR-EoR,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society423 (2012) 2518–2532

    2012

  26. [34]

    Wolz, F.B

    L. Wolz, F.B. Abdalla, C. Blake, J.R. Shaw, E. Chapman and S. Rawlings,The effect of foreground subtraction on cosmological measurements from intensity mapping, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society441 (2014) 3271–3283

    2014

  27. [35]

    Eisenstein, H

    D.J. Eisenstein, H. Seo, E. Sirko and D.N. Spergel,Improving Cosmological Distance Measurements by Reconstruction of the Baryon Acoustic Peak,The Astrophysical Journal664(2007) 675

    2007

  28. [36]

    H.-M. Zhu, Y. Yu, U.-L. Pen, X. Chen and H.-R. Yu,Nonlinear reconstruction, Physical Review D96 (2017) 123502 [arXiv:1611.09638]

    2017 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Yu, H.-M

    Y. Yu, H.-M. Zhu and U.-L. Pen,Halo Nonlinear Reconstruction,The Astrophysical Journal847(2017) 110 [arXiv:1703.08301]. – 19 –

    2017 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Wang, H.-R

    X. Wang, H.-R. Yu, H.-M. Zhu, Y. Yu, Q. Pan and U.-L. Pen,Isobaric Reconstruction of the Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation,The Astrophysical Journall841 (2017) L29 [arXiv:1703.09742]

    2017 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Obuljen, F

    A. Obuljen, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, E. Castorina and M. Viel,Baryon Acoustic Oscillations reconstruction with pixels,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2017 (2017) 012

    2017

  32. [41]

    Wang and U.-L

    X. Wang and U.-L. Pen,Understanding the Reconstruction of the Biased Tracer,The Astrophysical Journal 870 (2019) 116

    2019

  33. [42]

    Birkin, B

    J. Birkin, B. Li, M. Cautun and Y. Shi,Reconstructing the baryon acoustic oscillations using biased tracers, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society483 (2019) 5267 [arXiv:1809.08135]

    2019 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Seo and C.M

    H.-J. Seo and C.M. Hirata,The foreground wedge and 21 cm BAO surveys,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society456 (2016) 3142

    2016

  35. [44]

    J.D. Cohn, M. White, T.-C. Chang, G. Holder, N. Padmanabhan and O. Doré,Combining galaxy and 21cm surveys,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society457 (2016) 2068

    2016

  36. [45]

    Zhu, U.-L

    H.-M. Zhu, U.-L. Pen, Y. Yu, X. Er and X. Chen,Cosmic Tidal Reconstruction,Physical Review D93 (2016) 103504

    2016

  37. [46]

    Villaescusa-Navarro, P

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro, P. Bull and M. Viel,Weighing neutrinos with cosmic neutral hydrogen, The Astrophysical Journal814(2015) 146

    2015

  38. [47]

    Sadeh, F.B

    I. Sadeh, F.B. Abdalla and O. Lahav,ANNz2: Photometric Redshift and Probability Distribution Function Estimation using Machine Learning, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 128(2016) 104502

    2016

  39. [48]

    M. Ho, M.M. Rau, M. Ntampaka, A. Farahi, H. Trac and B. Poczos,A Robust and Efficient Deep Learning Method for Dynamical Mass Measurements of Galaxy Clusters,The Astrophysical Journal 887(2019) 25

    2019

  40. [49]

    Agarap,Deep learning using rectified linear units (relu),arXiv e-prints(2018) [arXiv:1803.08375]

    A.F. Agarap,Deep learning using rectified linear units (relu),arXiv e-prints(2018) [arXiv:1803.08375]

    2018 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Z. Wu, Z. Zhang, S. Pan, H. Miao, X. Luo, X. Wang et al.,Cosmic Velocity Field Reconstruction Using AI, The Astrophysical Journal913 (2021) 2

    2021

  42. [51]

    Villanueva-Domingo, F

    P. Villanueva-Domingo, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, D. Anglés-Alcázar, S. Genel, F. Marinacci, D.N. Spergel et al.,Inferring Halo Masses with Graph Neural Networks, The Astrophysical Journal935 (2022) 30

    2022

  43. [52]

    Schaurecker, Y

    D. Schaurecker, Y. Li, J. Tinker, S. Ho and A. Refregier,Super-resolving Dark Matter Halos using Generative Deep Learning,arXiv e-prints(2022) [arXiv:2111.06393]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [53]

    F. Shi, H. Chang, L. Zhang, H. Shan, J. Zhang, S. Zhou et al.,21-cm foreground removal using ai and the frequency-difference technique,Physical Review D109(2024)

    2024

  45. [54]

    Masipa, S

    M.P. Masipa, S. Hassan, M.G. Santos, G. Contardo and K. Cho,Emulating radiation transport on cosmological scale using a denoising Unet,arXiv e-prints(2023) [arXiv:2303.12065]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [55]

    T.-X. Mao, J. Wang, B. Li, Y.-C. Cai, B. Falck, M. Neyrinck et al.,Baryon acoustic oscillations reconstruction using convolutional neural networks,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 501(2020) 1499

    2020

  47. [56]

    W. Li, H. Xu, Z. Ma, R. Zhu, D. Hu, Z. Zhu et al.,Separating the EoR signal with a convolutional denoising autoencoder: a deep-learning-based method,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 485 (2019) 2628

    2019

  48. [57]

    Gagnon-Hartman, Y

    S. Gagnon-Hartman, Y. Cui, J. Kennedy, A. Liu and S. Ravanbakhsh,Recovering the Wedge Modes Lost to 21-cm Foregrounds,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society504(2021) 4716. – 20 –

    2021

  49. [58]

    Bianco, S.K

    M. Bianco, S.K. Giri, I.T. Iliev and G. Mellema,Deep learning approach for identification of HII regions during reionization in 21-cm observations,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 505 (2021) 3982

    2021

  50. [59]

    Datta, J.D

    A. Datta, J.D. Bowman and C.L. Carilli,BRIGHT SOURCE SUBTRACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR REDSHIFTED 21 cm MEASUREMENTS,The Astrophysical Journal724 (2010) 526

    2010

  51. [60]

    Morales, B

    M.F. Morales, B. Hazelton, I. Sullivan and A. Beardsley,FOUR FUNDAMENTAL FOREGROUND POWERSPECTRUMSHAPESFOR21cmCOSMOLOGYOBSERVATIONS ,TheAstrophysicalJournal 752 (2012) 137

    2012

  52. [61]

    Parsons, J.C

    A.R. Parsons, J.C. Pober, J.E. Aguirre, C.L. Carilli, D.C. Jacobs and D.F. Moore,A Per-Baseline, Delay-Spectrum Technique for Accessing the 21cm Cosmic Reionization Signature,The Astrophysical Journal 756 (2012) 165

    2012

  53. [62]

    Eisenstein, H.-J

    D.J. Eisenstein, H.-J. Seo and M. White,On the Robustness of the Acoustic Scale in the Low-Redshift Clustering of Matter,The Astrophysical Journal664(2007) 660 [astro-ph/0604361]

    2007 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Mehta, A.J

    K.T. Mehta, A.J. Cuesta, X. Xu, D.J. Eisenstein and N. Padmanabhan,A 2 per cent distance to z = 0.35 by reconstructing baryon acoustic oscillations - III. Cosmological measurements and interpretation, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society427 (2012) 2168 [arXiv:1202.0092]

    2012 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Gil-Marín, W.J

    H. Gil-Marín, W.J. Percival, A.J. Cuesta, J.R. Brownstein, C.-H. Chuang, S. Ho et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: BAO measurement from the LOS-dependent power spectrum of DR12 BOSS galaxies,Monthly Notices of the Royal As...

    2016 arXiv

  56. [65]

    Bautista, M

    J.E. Bautista, M. Vargas-Magaña, K.S. Dawson, W.J. Percival, J. Brinkmann, J. Brownstein et al.,The SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations at Redshift of 0.72 with the DR14 Luminous Red Galaxy Sample,The Astrophysical Journal863(...

    2018 arXiv

  57. [66]

    Adame, J

    DESI Collaboration, A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander et al.,DESI 2024 III: BaryonAcousticOscillationsfromGalaxiesandQuasars ,arXive-prints (2024) [arXiv:2404.03000]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [67]

    S.Tassev, M.ZaldarriagaandD.J.Eisenstein, SolvinglargescalestructureinteneasystepswithCOLA , JCAP 2013 (2013) 036 [arXiv:1301.0322]

    2013 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Behroozi, R.H

    P.S. Behroozi, R.H. Wechsler and H.-Y. Wu,The Rockstar Phase-Space Temporal Halo Finder and the Velocity Offsets of Cluster Cores,The Astrophysical Journal762(2013) 109

    2013

  60. [69]

    Cooray and R

    A. Cooray and R. Sheth,Halo models of large scale structure,Physics Reports372(2002) 1

    2002

  61. [70]

    Ronneberger, P

    O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer and T. Brox,U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation, inMICCAI 2015, (Cham), pp. 234–241, Springer International Publishing, 2015 [arXiv:1505.04597]

    2015 arXiv

  62. [71]

    Shelhamer, J

    E. Shelhamer, J. Long and T. Darrell,Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation,IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence39(2017) 640

    2017

  63. [72]

    Kingma and J

    D.P. Kingma and J. Ba,Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, [arXiv:1412.6980]

    arXiv

  64. [73]

    Schmittfull, T

    M. Schmittfull, T. Baldauf and M. Zaldarriaga,Iterative initial condition reconstruction,Physical Review D96 (2017) 023505 [arXiv:1704.06634]

    2017 arXiv

  65. [74]

    Anderson, E

    L. Anderson, E. Aubourg, S. Bailey, D. Bizyaev, M. Blanton, A.S. Bolton et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the Data Release 9 spectroscopic galaxy sample,MNRAS 427 (2012) 3435 [arXiv1203.6594]

    2012 arXiv

  66. [75]

    CAMB: Code for Anisotropies in the Microwave Background

    A. Lewis and A. Challinor, “CAMB: Code for Anisotropies in the Microwave Background.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1102.026, Feb., 2011

    2011

  67. [76]

    Bernardeau, S

    F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gaztañaga and R. Scoccimarro,Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory,Physics Reports367 (2002) 1 [astro-ph/0112551]. – 21 –

    2002 arXiv

  68. [77]

    Paul, M.G

    S. Paul, M.G. Santos, Z. Chen and L. Wolz,A first detection of neutral hydrogen intensity mapping on Mpc scales at𝑧≈ 0.32and𝑧≈ 0.44, arXiv e-prints(2023) [arXiv:2301.11943]. – 22 –

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.