pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24684 · v1 · pith:3QHD5GLZnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Only obscured yet luminous active galactic nuclei are closely associated with galaxy mergers: Direct observational evidence from type 2 active galactic nuclei

Yongmin Yoon , Yongjung Kim , Dohyeong Kim , Jaejun Cho , Woowon Byun This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 23:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxy mergersactive galactic nucleitype 2 AGNstidal featuresdust obscuration[O III] luminositymerger triggeringAGN evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Only active galactic nuclei that are both luminous and heavily dust-obscured show strong association with galaxy mergers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the fraction of type 2 AGN host galaxies that display tidal features, taken as direct signs of recent mergers. It separates the effects of AGN luminosity, measured by extinction-corrected [O III] line luminosity, from dust obscuration measured by the Balmer decrement E(B-V). The key result is that the merger fraction rises sharply only when both luminosity and obscuration are high. This matters because it clarifies which AGNs are triggered by mergers rather than other processes, supporting an evolutionary picture where mergers drive a brief obscured luminous phase.

Core claim

AGNs with log L_[O III] ≳41.5 and E(B-V)≳0.7 exhibit a high fraction of tidal features f_T of ∼0.7. In contrast, AGNs with either low luminosity (log L_[O III]≲41.0) or low dust obscuration (E(B-V)≲0.3) show a low f_T of ≲0.2. This indicates that galaxy mergers preferentially trigger AGNs that are simultaneously luminous and dust-obscured.

What carries the argument

The tidal feature fraction f_T, derived from deep imaging as direct evidence of mergers, examined as a function of internal-extinction-corrected [O III] luminosity and Balmer-decrement E(B-V).

If this is right

  • AGNs that are luminous but not obscured do not show elevated merger rates.
  • Obscured but low-luminosity AGNs also lack strong merger association.
  • The result supports interpreting luminous obscured AGNs as temporally closer to merger events in an evolutionary sequence.
  • Merger-driven triggering applies specifically to the combination of high luminosity and high obscuration.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the trend holds, it implies that the merger-AGN connection is phase-specific rather than general.
  • Future observations could check whether this pattern persists at higher redshifts where merger rates differ.
  • Models of AGN feedback might need to account for why only the obscured luminous stage correlates with tidal features.

Load-bearing premise

The corrected [O III] luminosity reliably indicates the intrinsic AGN power and the E(B-V) from Balmer lines measures the dust relevant to the triggering process.

What would settle it

A large sample of either high-luminosity low-obscuration AGNs or low-luminosity high-obscuration AGNs with tidal feature fractions near 0.7 would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24684 by Dohyeong Kim, Jaejun Cho, Woowon Byun, Yongjung Kim, Yongmin Yoon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Distribution of galaxies at z < 0.063 in the BPT diagram, which classifies galaxies based on the emission-line flux ratios [O III] λ5007/Hβ and [N II] λ6584/Hα, is shown as a number￾density plot in which darker regions indicate a higher density of data points. The dashed line indicates the demarcation defined by Equation (1) in Kauffmann et al. (2003), below which galax￾ies are classified as star-forming. … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Examples of type 2 AGN hosts with tidal features, which have low [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Examples of type 2 AGN hosts with tidal features, which have intermediate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Examples of type 2 AGN hosts with tidal features, which have high [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Examples of type 2 AGN hosts that do not have tidal features. The two left columns show AGN hosts with low [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distribution of type 2 AGNs in the plane of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distributions of log L[O III] (log Lbol) and E(B−V) (AV) for AGN hosts with and without tidal features. The vertical dashed lines mark the median value of each parameter for the two AGN categories. AV for our sample is 1.3, which is consistent with the median value of 1.1 reported for AGN hosts studied in Zhuang & Ho (2020). The top panels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: First and second panels: Fraction of type 2 AGN hosts with tidal features ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Fraction of type 2 AGN hosts with tidal features ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Same as Figure 10, but with AGNs in all the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Fraction of type 2 AGN hosts with bar structures ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

To establish a more comprehensive understanding of the connection between galaxy mergers and active galactic nuclei (AGNs), it is essential to disentangle the contributions of intrinsic AGN luminosity and dust extinction to the merger-AGN connection. Since tidal features identified in deep images serve as direct evidence of recent mergers, we studied the fraction of AGN hosts with tidal features ($f_T$) for a large sample of 748 type 2 AGNs at $z<0.063$. Specifically, we examined $f_T$ as a function of $E(B-V)$, derived from the Balmer decrement, and the internal-extinction-corrected luminosity of the [O III] $\lambda$5007 emission line ($L_{\text{[O III]}}$), which is a proxy for bolometric AGN luminosity. Our main finding is that $f_T$ is only significantly higher for AGNs that are simultaneously luminous and heavily dust-obscured. Specifically, AGNs with $\log L_{\text{[O III]}}\gtrsim41.5$ and $E(B-V)\gtrsim0.7$ exhibit a high $f_T$ of $\sim0.7$. In contrast, AGNs with either low luminosity ($\log L_{\text{[O III]}}\lesssim41.0$) or low dust obscuration ($E(B-V)\lesssim0.3$) show a low $f_T$ of $\lesssim0.2$. This trend suggests that galaxy mergers preferentially trigger AGNs that are simultaneously luminous and dust-obscured, whereas AGNs that are either luminous but unobscured or dust-obscured but less luminous are not strongly associated with merger-driven triggering. Based on several assumptions, our result can also be interpreted, despite certain caveats, within the framework of a merger-initiated evolution model for AGNs, suggesting that AGNs that are both obscured and luminous are temporally closer to merger events than those with lower luminosities and less dust obscuration.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports an observational analysis of 748 type-2 AGNs at z<0.063, showing that the tidal-feature fraction f_T reaches ~0.7 only in the joint high-luminosity (log L_[O III] ≳41.5) and high-obscuration (E(B-V)≳0.7) bin, while AGNs with either low luminosity (log L_[O III]≲41.0) or low obscuration (E(B-V)≲0.3) exhibit f_T ≲0.2. The result is interpreted as evidence that galaxy mergers preferentially trigger AGNs that are simultaneously luminous and dust-obscured, consistent with a merger-driven evolutionary sequence.

Significance. If the central trend is robust, the work supplies direct morphological evidence (tidal features) that isolates the merger-AGN link to a specific region of the luminosity-obscuration plane, strengthening the case for merger-triggered fueling in the obscured luminous phase. The sample size of 748 objects and the explicit separation of luminosity and extinction effects are positive features; the result is falsifiable with independent merger indicators or alternative luminosity proxies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and main results paragraph: the reported f_T values (~0.7 vs ≲0.2) are stated without accompanying uncertainties, binomial errors, or any statistical test (e.g., Fisher exact or Kolmogorov-Smirnov) comparing the high-high bin to the other three quadrants. Because the exclusivity of the high-high corner is the central claim, the absence of these quantities prevents verification that the difference is significant rather than a binning artifact.
  2. [Abstract / interpretation] The interpretation paragraph (final sentence of abstract and discussion): the claim that the Balmer-decrement E(B-V) and internal-extinction-corrected L_[O III] jointly trace the merger-relevant dust column and bolometric power rests on the assumptions that (i) the Balmer lines and [O III] arise from the same NLR gas with uniform covering factor and (ii) a foreground-screen geometry applies. No test against luminosity-dependent ionization or clumpy-torus geometries is presented; if either mapping varies systematically with L or E(B-V), the apparent exclusivity of the high-high bin could be an observational selection effect rather than a physical preference.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract does not specify the parent catalog, selection cuts, or redshift completeness for the 748-object sample; these details are required to assess whether the low-luminosity or low-E(B-V) bins are affected by Malmquist-type biases.
  2. [Methods] Notation for the corrected [O III] luminosity is introduced as L_[O III] without an explicit equation showing the extinction correction formula or the adopted intrinsic Balmer ratio; a short methods equation would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly where possible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and main results paragraph: the reported f_T values (~0.7 vs ≲0.2) are stated without accompanying uncertainties, binomial errors, or any statistical test (e.g., Fisher exact or Kolmogorov-Smirnov) comparing the high-high bin to the other three quadrants. Because the exclusivity of the high-high corner is the central claim, the absence of these quantities prevents verification that the difference is significant rather than a binning artifact.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of uncertainties and statistical tests weakens the presentation of the central result. In the revised manuscript we have added binomial uncertainties to all quoted f_T values and included the outcome of a Fisher exact test comparing the high-luminosity/high-obscuration bin against the other three quadrants. These additions appear in both the abstract and the results section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract / interpretation] The interpretation paragraph (final sentence of abstract and discussion): the claim that the Balmer-decrement E(B-V) and internal-extinction-corrected L_[O III] jointly trace the merger-relevant dust column and bolometric power rests on the assumptions that (i) the Balmer lines and [O III] arise from the same NLR gas with uniform covering factor and (ii) a foreground-screen geometry applies. No test against luminosity-dependent ionization or clumpy-torus geometries is presented; if either mapping varies systematically with L or E(B-V), the apparent exclusivity of the high-high bin could be an observational selection effect rather than a physical preference.

    Authors: The abstract already states that the interpretation rests on several assumptions and notes the presence of caveats. We have expanded the discussion section to address possible luminosity-dependent ionization effects and clumpy-torus geometries, citing supporting literature that indicates these factors are unlikely to produce the observed exclusivity of the high-high bin. A definitive test against all alternative geometries would require multi-wavelength data beyond the current optical sample; we therefore regard the revision as partial. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational binning of empirical fractions

full rationale

The paper reports an empirical correlation: f_T is measured directly from imaging for 748 type-2 AGNs and partitioned by observed Balmer-decrement E(B-V) and extinction-corrected [O III] luminosity. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivations are present that reduce a claimed prediction back to the input quantities by construction. The result is a set of binned fractions; the mapping from observables to physical interpretation is stated as an assumption rather than derived. No self-citation load-bearing steps or ansatz smuggling appear in the provided text. This is a standard observational correlation study whose central claim stands or falls on the data and the validity of the chosen tracers, not on internal definitional closure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on three standard domain assumptions about proxies and indicators; no free parameters or new entities introduced in the abstract.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Tidal features identified in deep images serve as direct evidence of recent mergers.
    Explicitly stated in abstract as the basis for f_T.
  • domain assumption Internal-extinction-corrected L_[O III] is a proxy for bolometric AGN luminosity.
    Used directly to bin the sample.
  • domain assumption E(B-V) derived from the Balmer decrement measures the relevant dust obscuration.
    Used to bin the sample by obscuration.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5915 in / 1320 out tokens · 26463 ms · 2026-06-25T23:34:43.464793+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    2011, ApJS, 193, 2,

    Aihara, H., Allende Prieto, C., An, D., et al. 2011, ApJS, 193, 2,

    2011

  2. [2]

    2018, A&A, 618, A149

    Alonso, S., Coldwell, G., Duplancic, F., et al. 2018, A&A, 618, A149. Alonso, M. S., Lambas, D. G., Tissera, P., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 3,

    2018

  3. [3]

    Araujo, B. L. C., Storchi-Bergmann, T., Rembold, S. B., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 4,

    2023

  4. [4]

    Arjona-Gálvez, E., Di Cintio, A., & Grand, R. J. J. 2024, A&A, 690, A286. Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93,

    2024

  5. [5]

    G., Hewett, P

    Banerji, M., McMahon, R. G., Hewett, P. C., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 3,

    2012

  6. [6]

    Barnes, J. E. 1988, ApJ, 331,

    1988

  7. [7]

    Barnes, J. E. & Hernquist, L. 1992, ARA&A, 30,

    1992

  8. [8]

    H., et al

    Berentzen, I., Athanassoula, E., Heller, C. H., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 347, 1,

    2004

  9. [9]

    2020, MNRAS, 498, 2,

    Bílek, M., Duc, P.-A., Cuillandre, J.-C., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 2,

    2020

  10. [10]

    2023, A&A, 672, A27

    Bílek, M., Duc, P.-A., & Sola, E. 2023, A&A, 672, A27. Blandford, R., Meier, D., & Readhead, A. 2019, ARA&A, 57,

    2023

  11. [11]

    G., Benson, A

    Bower, R. G., Benson, A. J., Malbon, R., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 2,

    2006

  12. [12]

    H., Ellison, S

    Byrne-Mamahit, S., Hani, M. H., Ellison, S. L., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 4,

    2023

  13. [13]

    R., V olonteri, M., Dotti, M., et al

    Capelo, P. R., V olonteri, M., Dotti, M., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 3,

    2015

  14. [14]

    N., Urry, C

    Cardamone, C. N., Urry, C. M., Damen, M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 680, 1,

    2008

  15. [15]

    2012, MNRAS, 420, 3,

    Carpineti, A., Kaviraj, S., Darg, D., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 3,

    2012

  16. [16]

    Casteels, K. R. V ., Bamford, S. P., Skibba, R. A., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 2,

    2013

  17. [17]

    2005, MNRAS, 359, 4,

    Cattaneo, A., Combes, F., Colombi, S., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 4,

    2005

  18. [18]

    & Safarzadeh, M

    Cen, R. & Safarzadeh, M. 2015, ApJ, 798, 2, L38. Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 809,

    2015

  19. [19]

    R., Athanassoula, E., et al

    Cheung, E., Trump, J. R., Athanassoula, E., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 1,

    2015

  20. [20]

    S., Ostriker, J

    Choi, E., Somerville, R. S., Ostriker, J. P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 1,

    2024

  21. [21]

    2023, A&A, 680, A82

    Christensen, L., Jakobsen, P., Willott, C., et al. 2023, A&A, 680, A82. Cisternas, M., Jahnke, K., Inskip, K. J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 726, 2,

    2023

  22. [22]

    2015, ApJ, 802, 2,

    Cisternas, M., Sheth, K., Salvato, M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 802, 2,

    2015

  23. [23]

    M., Nevin, R., Negus, J., et al

    Comerford, J. M., Nevin, R., Negus, J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 1,

    2024

  24. [24]

    2017, , arXiv:1711.06575

    Comparat, J., Maraston, C., Goddard, D., et al. 2017, , arXiv:1711.06575. Conroy, C. & White, M. 2013, ApJ, 762, 2,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  25. [25]

    Conselice, C. J. 2003, ApJS, 147, 1,

    2003

  26. [26]

    2013, MNRAS, 431, 3,

    Cotini, S., Ripamonti, E., Caccianiga, A., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 3,

    2013

  27. [27]

    M., Kraemer, S

    Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., & Gabel, J. R. 2003, AJ, 126, 4,

    2003

  28. [28]

    J., Springel, V ., White, S

    Croton, D. J., Springel, V ., White, S. D. M., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 1,

    2006

  29. [29]

    L., Fumagalli, M., et al

    Dalton, T., Morris, S. L., Fumagalli, M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 1,

    2022

  30. [30]

    W., Kaviraj, S., Lintott, C

    Darg, D. W., Kaviraj, S., Lintott, C. J., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 3,

    2010

  31. [31]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 5,

    2019

  32. [32]

    2005, Nature, 433, 7026,

    Di Matteo, T., Springel, V ., & Hernquist, L. 2005, Nature, 433, 7026,

    2005

  33. [33]

    2018, MN- RAS, 476, 3,

    Domínguez Sánchez, H., Huertas-Company, M., Bernardi, M., et al. 2018, MN- RAS, 476, 3,

    2018

  34. [34]

    L., Kartaltepe, J., Kocevski, D., et al

    Donley, J. L., Kartaltepe, J., Kocevski, D., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, 1,

    2018

  35. [35]

    2004, MNRAS, 355, 3,

    Dovˇciak, M., Karas, V ., & Matt, G. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 3,

    2004

  36. [36]

    2015, MNRAS, 446, 1,

    Duc, P.-A., Cuillandre, J.-C., Karabal, E., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 1,

    2015

  37. [37]

    L., Mendel, J

    Ellison, S. L., Mendel, J. T., Patton, D. R., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 4,

    2013

  38. [38]

    L., Viswanathan, A., Patton, D

    Ellison, S. L., Viswanathan, A., Patton, D. R., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 2,

    2019

  39. [39]

    2025, , arXiv:2503.15317

    Euclid Collaboration, La Marca, A., Wang, L., et al. 2025, , arXiv:2503.15317. Feldmann, R., Mayer, L., & Carollo, C. M. 2008, ApJ, 684, 2,

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 755,

    1999

  41. [41]

    M., Impey, C

    Gabor, J. M., Impey, C. D., Jahnke, K., et al. 2009, ApJ, 691, 1,

    2009

  42. [42]

    A., Willett, K

    Galloway, M. A., Willett, K. W., Fortson, L. F., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 4,

    2015

  43. [43]

    2021, MNRAS, 502, 2,

    Ghosh, S., Saha, K., Di Matteo, P., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 2,

    2021

  44. [44]

    2015, ApJ, 806, 2,

    Glikman, E., Simmons, B., Mailly, M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 2,

    2015

  45. [45]

    2012, ApJ, 757, 1,

    Glikman, E., Urrutia, T., Lacy, M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 757, 1,

    2012

  46. [46]

    D., Greene, J

    Goulding, A. D., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S37. Halpern, J. P. & Steiner, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 269, L37. Heckman, T. M., Kauffmann, G., Brinchmann, J., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 1,

    2018

  47. [47]

    M., Cortes-Suárez, E., Vázquez-Mata, J

    Hernández-Toledo, H. M., Cortes-Suárez, E., Vázquez-Mata, J. A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 3,

    2023

  48. [48]

    & Spergel, D

    Hernquist, L. & Spergel, D. N. 1992, ApJ, 399, L117. Hirschmann, M., Somerville, R. S., Naab, T., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1,

    1992

  49. [49]

    1971, ApJ, 168,

    Hohl, F. 1971, ApJ, 168,

    1971

  50. [50]

    2015, ApJ, 804, 1,

    Hong, J., Im, M., Kim, M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 804, 1,

    2015

  51. [51]

    F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T

    Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., et al. 2006, ApJS, 163, 1,

    2006

  52. [52]

    F., Hernquist, L., Martini, P., et al

    Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Martini, P., et al. 2005, ApJ, 625, 2, L71. Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., et al. 2008, ApJS, 175, 2,

    2005

  53. [53]

    Jaffarian, G. W. & Gaskell, C. M. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 1,

    2020

  54. [54]

    Ji, I., Peirani, S., & Yi, S. K. 2014, A&A, 566, A97. Jiang, L., McGreer, I. D., Fan, X., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 2,

    2014

  55. [55]

    D., Rix, H.-W., et al

    Jogee, S., Barazza, F. D., Rix, H.-W., et al. 2004, ApJ, 615, 2, L105. Jovanovi´c, P. & Popovi´c, L. ˇC. 2008, Fortschritte der Physik, 56, 4-5,

    2004

  56. [56]

    & Heckman, T

    Kauffmann, G. & Heckman, T. M. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 1,

    2009

  57. [57]

    M., Tremonti, C., et al

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 4,

    2003

  58. [58]

    2010, MNRAS, 406, 1,

    Kaviraj, S. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 1,

    2010

  59. [59]

    S., et al

    Kaviraj, S., Tan, K.-M., Ellis, R. S., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 411, 4,

    2011

  60. [60]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., et al. 2001, ApJ, 556, 1,

    2001

  61. [61]

    Kim, D. & Im, M. 2018, A&A, 610, A31. Kim, D., Im, M., Glikman, E., et al. 2015b, ApJ, 812, 1,

    2018

  62. [62]

    2015a, ApJ, 813, 2, L35

    Kim, Y ., Im, M., Jeon, Y ., et al. 2015a, ApJ, 813, 2, L35. Kim, Y ., Im, M., Jeon, Y ., et al. 2019, ApJ, 870, 2,

    2019

  63. [63]

    2020, ApJ, 904, 2,

    Kim, Y ., Im, M., Jeon, Y ., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 2,

    2020

  64. [64]

    2024b, A&A, 690, A283

    Kim, D., Kim, Y ., Im, M., et al. 2024b, A&A, 690, A283. Kocevski, D. D., Brightman, M., Nandra, K., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 2,

    2015

  65. [65]

    D., Faber, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Faber, S. M., Mozena, M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 2,

    2012

  66. [66]

    Kormendy, J. & Ho, L. C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 1,

    2013

  67. [67]

    J., Blecha, L., Bernhard, P., et al

    Koss, M. J., Blecha, L., Bernhard, P., et al. 2018, Nature, 563, 7730,

    2018

  68. [68]

    S., Reeves, J., et al

    Laha, S., Reynolds, C. S., Reeves, J., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5,

    2021

  69. [69]

    2024, A&A, 690, A326

    La Marca, A., Margalef-Bentabol, B., Wang, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A326. LaMassa, S. M., Heckman, T. M., Ptak, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 705, 1,

    2024

  70. [70]

    2003, A&A, 402,

    Le Borgne, J.-F., Bruzual, G., Pelló, R., et al. 2003, A&A, 402,

    2003

  71. [71]

    & Bryan, G

    Li, Y . & Bryan, G. L. 2014, ApJ, 789, 2,

    2014

  72. [72]

    2023, ApJ, 944, 2,

    Li, W., Nair, P., Irwin, J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 2,

    2023

  73. [73]

    M., Primack, J., & Madau, P

    Lotz, J. M., Primack, J., & Madau, P. 2004, AJ, 128, 1,

    2004

  74. [74]

    2020, MNRAS, 493, 3,

    Macconi, D., Torresi, E., Grandi, P., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 3,

    2020

  75. [75]

    2019, A&A, 632, A122

    Mancillas, B., Duc, P.-A., Combes, F., et al. 2019, A&A, 632, A122. Maraston, C. & Strömbäck, G. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 4,

    2019

  76. [76]

    2020, ApJ, 904, 1,

    Marian, V ., Jahnke, K., Andika, I., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 1,

    2020

  77. [77]

    2019, ApJ, 882, 2,

    Marian, V ., Jahnke, K., Mechtley, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 2,

    2019

  78. [78]

    McConnell, N. J. & Ma, C.-P. 2013, ApJ, 764, 2,

    2013

  79. [79]

    A., et al

    Mechtley, M., Jahnke, K., Windhorst, R. A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 830, 2,

    2016

  80. [80]

    2014, A&A, 569, A37

    Menci, N., Gatti, M., Fiore, F., et al. 2014, A&A, 569, A37. Moetazedian, R., Polyachenko, E. V ., Berczik, P., et al. 2017, A&A, 604, A75. Nair, P. B. & Abraham, R. G. 2010, ApJS, 186, 2,

    2014

Showing first 80 references.