Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 90 references

Mind Games! Exploring the Impact of Dark Patterns in Mixed Reality Scenarios

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that dark patterns—deceptive overlays in mixed reality—significantly reduce user comfort and intention to use MR glasses while increasing reactance and perceived system darkness, across all four patterns and all three…

desk verdict Solid first quantitative study of dark patterns in MR, but the one-stimulus-per-cell design means the category-level claims are weaker than the abstract suggests. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06774 v1 pith:3QW4MANF submitted 2025-06-07 cs.HC

Luca-Maxim Meinhardt , Simon Demharter , Michael Rietzler , Mark Colley , Thomas E{ss}meyer , Enrico Rukzio This is my paper
classification cs.HC
keywords darkpatternsdeceptivedesignmixedrealityuserstudyreactancesystemdarknessintentiontouseethical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Dark patterns—deceptive interface techniques that push people into actions they did not intend—are usually studied in websites and apps; this paper asks whether they do measurable harm when transplanted into mixed reality. The authors try to establish that they do: in a two-factorial video study with 74 participants, four dark patterns applied to three real-world targets (a place, a product, a person) all significantly lowered comfort and intention to use MR glasses while raising reactance and perceived system darkness relative to a dark-pattern-free baseline. The most disruptive combinations involved personal interference (obscuring a person's face behind a paywall) and monetary manipulation (sneaking a product into the shopping cart). If the claim holds, deceptive design is not just a web problem but an emerging MR problem that designers and regulators should address before the hardware becomes widespread.

What carries the argument

The study's engine is a two-factorial within-subject video study: 13 two-minute videos shot as a first-person city walk, structured as 4 dark patterns (Emotional or Sensory Manipulation, Forced Registration, Hiding Information, Urgency) times 3 augmentation targets (place, product, person), plus one dark-pattern-free baseline. Each pattern was adapted from the meso-level of a published dark-pattern ontology, chosen because that level is context-agnostic and can be interpreted for a specific application type. Participants rated every video on four instruments: a reactance questionnaire, the System Darkness Scale (a validated measure of how manipulative a system feels), a single comfort item, and a two-item intention-to-use scale, allowing the authors to separate the effect of the pattern, the effect of the target, and their interaction against the same baseline of ordinary MR aids such as navigation and weather overlays.

What would settle it

Re-run the study with several independently produced designs per dark-pattern-target pair; if the within-pattern variance in comfort and reactance is as large as the between-pattern differences, the claim that dark patterns themselves—rather than their specific renderings—drive the effects is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that all four dark patterns it tested—Emotional or Sensory Manipulation, Forced Registration, Hiding Information, and Urgency—significantly harm the mixed-reality user experience no matter what real-world object they are attached to. Across 74 participants who each watched 13 videos of a simulated city walk through MR glasses, every pattern scored worse than the baseline on all four measures: higher reactance, higher system darkness, lower comfort, and lower intention to use the glasses. The authors further claim that the impact is most severe when the pattern touches personal identity or money, and that two patterns from different high-level families, Emotional or Sensory Manipulation and Hiding Information, produced similar effects, suggesting that dark-pattern taxonomies should incorporate measured user impact rather than only design technique.

Load-bearing premise

The results are interpreted as effects of the dark pattern category, but each category was shown through one concrete visual design, so a different design might have produced different ratings.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Designers of MR applications now have quantitative evidence that these four manipulative tactics reduce users' comfort and willingness to adopt the product, so deploying them is likely to backfire commercially.
  • The severe reactions to face-obscuring registration and cart-sneaking suggest that applications targeting personal identity or direct monetary loss will encounter the strongest user resistance.
  • The similar user impact of Emotional or Sensory Manipulation and Hiding Information supports moving toward classifications that group dark patterns by how they affect people, not only by how they are built.
  • Regulation and automated detection tools for dark patterns, already debated for websites, can now be extended to MR on the basis of measurable user responses rather than speculation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: the 'She likes you' overlay produced relatively low reactance, so a dark pattern that flatters may slip past users' defenses more easily than an openly obstructive one; an impact-based measure built only on felt resistance could therefore underrate the most effective manipulations.
  • My inference: because the effect clusters track the consequence the user experiences (losing money, losing control of personal appearance) rather than the UI tactic, a consequence-based taxonomy would likely generalize to augmented-reality advertising and diminished-reality interfaces, not just the four scenarios tested.
  • My inference: the video method probably understates or shifts attention effects compared with a worn headset, so a headset-based replication using the same stimulus designs would be a direct test of whether the reported effect sizes transfer to real MR use.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an online within-subject video study (N=74) in which four dark patterns taken from Gray et al.'s meso-level taxonomy were adapted to Mixed Reality and applied to three augmentation targets (place, product, person), plus a baseline condition. The authors measured reactance, System Darkness Scale, comfort, and intention to use, and report that all dark patterns significantly worsen these measures relative to baseline, with Forced Registration on a person and Hiding Information on a product being the most disruptive. They further argue that Emotional or Sensory Manipulation and Hiding Information produce similar user effects and that dark-pattern classifications should be reconsidered on the basis of user impact rather than design technique alone.

Significance. If the pattern-level claims are valid, this is a useful quantitative contribution to a literature that has so far largely relied on qualitative or speculative methods for dark patterns in Mixed Reality. The study uses a clear within-subject design, an a-priori power analysis, appropriate non-parametric repeated-measures analyses (Friedman test with Durbin-Conover post-hoc and Holm correction, ART ANOVA), and reports effect sizes. The inclusion of a baseline condition and attention checks is methodologically sound. The main weakness is that each Dark Pattern × Target cell contains exactly one video, which makes the dark-pattern category inseparable from the concrete visual design; this limits the central generalization to specific stimuli rather than dark-pattern types.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.1 and Table 1 / Section 3.1.1] The design assigns exactly one video to each Dark Pattern × Augmentation Target cell, so the dark-pattern factor is perfectly confounded with the concrete stimulus design (e.g., Hiding Information on Product is an "added to cart" banner, Urgency is a countdown timer, and Forced Registration on Person is a heart-and-lock occlusion). Consequently, the statement in Section 4.1 that "all dark patterns significantly impact our quantitative measures negatively, regardless of whether they target a place, product, or person" cannot be attributed to the dark-pattern categories. The data support only that these particular 12 video stimuli differ from the baseline. The Section 4.4 caveat that "we explored only one scenario per dark pattern" understates the issue: exemplar-level variance is unidentifiable, so no statistical analysis of the present data can separate pattern effects from exemplar effects. This is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Section 4.2 and Figures 3a/4b] The claim that Emotional or Sensory Manipulation and Hiding Information have similar impacts and that current classifications should be re-evaluated is based on visual inspection of the interaction plots rather than a statistical equivalence test or a targeted interaction contrast. Furthermore, the exemplars of these two patterns share surface features that the other two patterns' exemplars do not (non-occluding text-based overlays), so the observed similarity is also confounded with the concrete designs. The conclusion that these two categories should be reconsidered is therefore not yet established by the reported analyses.
  3. [Section 3.4.5 / Section 4.1] For intention to use, only a significant main effect of Dark Pattern is reported; no interaction effect or target-specific post-hoc contrasts are given. The Section 4.1 claim that effects hold "regardless of whether they target a place, product, or person" is thus stronger than the reported evidence for this dependent variable. The authors should either report the missing factorial results or soften the generalization to the measures for which target-level effects were actually examined.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.4.1] The text says "we recruited 79 participants but excluded five due to incorrect attention checks" and then refers to "These seven nonsensical attention checks"; the relationship between the seven checks and five excluded participants should be clarified.
  2. [Reference [49]] The Matsuda Hyper-Reality reference is dated "2026", which appears to be a typo; the correct access/publication date should be verified.
  3. [Section 3.1.1 / Table 1 / Table 3] The pattern name is inconsistently written as "Emotional or Sensory Manipulation", "Emotional Manipulation", and "Emotional Manipulation or Sensory" across the text and tables; the terminology should be standardized.
  4. [Section 4.1] The phrase "clearly recognized by users" overstates what the System Darkness Scale measures: the SDS captures perceived system darkness, not recognition or correct identification of dark patterns as in Mildner et al.'s recognition task.
  5. [Section 3 / Abstract] The design is described as a "4 × 3 + 1 baseline factorial design" and later as a "two-factorial" analysis; it would be clearer to state explicitly that the baseline is not a factor level in the ART analysis but was used only for the separate baseline comparisons.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; this is an empirical measurement study whose conclusions are statistical summaries of participant ratings, not quantities derived by definition or by fitted inputs.

full rationale

This paper is an empirical within-subject video study, not a derivation, so the standard circularity patterns do not apply. The dark-pattern stimuli are adapted from the external Gray et al. ontology [29]; the outcome measures (reactance scale [19], SDS [83], TAM intention-to-use [84], comfort item [73]) are established instruments, not quantities fitted to the data being 'predicted'. The central claims (Section 4.1: 'all dark patterns significantly impact our quantitative measures negatively') are direct statistical summaries of the collected ratings compared against a baseline, so the conclusion is not equivalent to any input definition: baseline, stimuli, and measures were fixed before data collection. The authors' own acknowledgment (Section 4.4: 'we explored only one scenario per dark pattern ... the observed effects may partly result from the specific design rather than the inherent impact of the dark pattern') concerns stimulus-sampling validity, not circularity. Self-citations such as the comfort item inspired by Rixen et al. [73] and the baseline-augmentation design from Rixen et al. [70] are methodological borrowings that do not carry the central claim; the taxonomy defining the independent variable is Gray et al. [29], outside the author group. Therefore no load-bearing circular step is exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's conclusions rest on three domain assumptions: video-based immersion approximates MR, the Gray et al. taxonomy maps cleanly to MR, and the SDS measures dark pattern perception outside web contexts. No new entities or free parameters are introduced. The single-scenario design is a design choice, not a free parameter, but it limits construct validity.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Video simulation of MR elicits psychological responses comparable to actual MR experiences.
    The study used online videos instead of physical MR headsets; the authors acknowledge this in Section 4.4 and report medium-to-high immersion (M=16.28, SD=6.58), but external validity to real MR remains an assumption.
  • domain assumption The meso-level dark patterns from Gray et al.'s ontology are transferable to MR contexts.
    The four patterns were adapted from Gray et al. [29] without an established mapping to MR; the authors interpret them contextually themselves (Section 3.1.1).
  • domain assumption The System Darkness Scale (SDS), originally designed for web shops, remains valid for MR.
    Section 3.3 states the SDS is used despite its origin in web shops; the authors note in the discussion (Section 4.2) that its applicability to MR is not established.
  • standard math Friedman test and aligned rank transform ANOVA are appropriate for the repeated-measures non-normal data.
    Shapiro-Wilk tests indicated non-normal distributions, so the authors used non-parametric procedures, which is a standard statistical approach.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mind Games! Exploring the Impact of Dark Patterns in Mixed Reality Scenarios." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3QW4MANF

@misc{pith2026250606774,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mind Games! Exploring the Impact of Dark Patterns in Mixed Reality Scenarios},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3QW4MANF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06774}
}
read the original abstract

Mixed Reality (MR) integrates virtual objects with the real world, offering potential but raising concerns about misuse through dark patterns. This study explored the effects of four dark patterns, adapted from prior research, and applied to MR across three targets: places, products, and people. In a two-factorial within-subject study with 74 participants, we analyzed 13 videos simulating MR experiences during a city walk. Results show that all dark patterns significantly reduced user comfort, increased reactance, and decreased the intention to use MR glasses, with the most disruptive effects linked to personal or monetary manipulation. Additionally, the dark patterns of Emotional and Sensory Manipulation and Hiding Information produced similar impacts on the user in MR, suggesting a re-evaluation of current classifications to go beyond deceptive design techniques. Our findings highlight the importance of developing ethical design guidelines and tools to detect and prevent dark patterns as immersive technologies continue to evolve.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.06774 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the four dark patterns adopted to MR and the target that they were applied to. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Baseline augmentations included navigation aids, weather forecasts, and contextual information about [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Interaction effects on reactance and System darkness scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Interaction effects on Comfort and main effect on intention to use [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2024.Apple Vision Pro

    Apple. 2024.Apple Vision Pro. Retrieved Aug 16, 2024 from https://www.apple.com/apple-vision-pro/

    2024

  2. [2]

    March, 2022

    European Data Protection Board. March, 2022. Guidelines 3/2022 on Dark patterns in social media platform in- terfaces: How to recognise and avoid them | European Data Protection Board. https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work- tools/documents/public-consultations/2022/guidelines-32022-dark-patterns-social-media_en Accessed7 09/03/2024

    2022

  3. [3]

    Elise Bonnail, Wen-Jie Tseng, Mark Mcgill, Eric Lecolinet, Samuel Huron, and Jan Gugenheimer. 2023. Memory Manipulations in Extended Reality. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–20. doi:10.1145/3544548.3580988

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Jolie Bonner, Florian Mathis, Joseph O’Hagan, and Mark Mcgill. 2023. When Filters Escape the Smartphone: Exploring Acceptance and Concerns Regarding Augmented Expression of Social Identity for Everyday AR. In29th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM, Christchurch New Zealand, 1–14. doi:10.1145/3611659.3615707

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    H Brignull, M Leiser, C Santos, and K Doshi. 2010. Deceptive patterns – user interfaces designed to trick you. https://www.deceptive.design/

    2010

  6. [6]

    Dimitrios Buhalis, Daniel Leung, and Michael Lin. 2023. Metaverse as a disruptive technology revolutionising tourism management and marketing.Tourism Management97 (Aug. 2023), 104724. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104724

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Christoph Bösch, Benjamin Erb, Frank Kargl, Henning Kopp, and Stefan Pfattheicher. 2016. Tales from the Dark Side: Privacy Dark Strategies and Privacy Dark Patterns.Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies2016, 4 (Oct. 2016), Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 9, No. 5, Article pn5758. Publication date: September 2025. pn5758:18 Meinhardt et al. ...

    doi:10.1515/popets-2016-0038 2016

  8. [8]

    Stephane Champely, Claus Ekstrom, Peter Dalgaard, Jeffrey Gill, Stephan Weibelzahl, Aditya Anandkumar, Clay Ford, Robert Volcic, and Helios De Rosario. [n. d.].Package ‘pwr’. https://cran.r-project.org/package=pwr

Show all 90 references
  1. [10]

    Shruthi Sai Chivukula, Ike Obi, Thomas V Carlock, and Colin M. Gray. 2023. Wrangling Ethical Design Complexity: Dilemmas, Tensions, and Situations. InDesigning Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, Pittsburgh PA USA, 179–183. doi:10.1145/3563703.3596632

    2023

  2. [11]

    Minjoo Cho and Daniel Saakes. 2017. Calm Automaton. InProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Gloria Mark, Susan Fussell, Cliff Lampe, m.c. schraefel, Juan Pablo Hourcade, Caroline Appert, and Daniel Wigdor (Eds.). ACM, ...

    2017

  3. [12]

    Jacob Cohen. 1992. A power primer.Psychological Bulletin112, 1 (1992), 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

    1992 doi

  4. [13]

    Mark Colley, Julian Britten, Simon Demharter, Tolga Hisir, and Enrico Rukzio. 2022. Feedback Strategies for Crowded Intersections in Automated Traffic — A Desirable Future?. InProceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicu...

    2022

  5. [14]

    1982.The social control of technology

    David Collingridge. 1982.The social control of technology. Frances Pinter St. Martin’s press, London New York

    1982

  6. [15]

    2022.Bringing Dark Patterns to Light Staff Report

    Federal Trade Commission. 2022.Bringing Dark Patterns to Light Staff Report. Technical Report. Federal Trade Commission. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/P214800%20Dark%20Patterns%20Report%209.14.2022%20- %20FINAL.pdf Accessed7 09/03/2024

    2022

  7. [16]

    James Price Dillard and Lijiang Shen. 2005. On the Nature of Reactance and its Role in Persuasive Health Communication. Communication Monographs72, 2 (2005), 144–168. doi:10.1080/03637750500111815

    2005 doi

  8. [17]

    Tobias Drey, Patrick Albus, Simon Der Kinderen, Maximilian Milo, Thilo Segschneider, Linda Chanzab, Michael Rietzler, Tina Seufert, and Enrico Rukzio. 2022. Towards Collaborative Learning in Virtual Reality: A Comparison of Co-Located Symmetric and Asymmetric Pair-Learning. In...

    2022

  9. [18]

    Chloe Eghtebas, Gudrun Klinker, Susanne Boll, and Marion Koelle. 2023. Co-Speculating on Dark Scenarios and Unintended Consequences of a Ubiquitous(ly) Augmented Reality. InProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, Pittsburgh PA USA, 2392–2407....

    2023

  10. [19]

    Patrick Ehrenbrink and Sebastian Möller. 2018. Development of a reactance scale for human–computer interaction. Quality and User Experience3, 1 (Dec. 2018), 2. doi:10.1007/s41233-018-0016-y

    2018 doi

  11. [20]

    European Commission. 2022. Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (Text with EEA relevance). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj

    2022

  12. [21]

    Federal Trade Commission. 2022. Bringing Dark Patterns to Light. https://www.ftc.gov/reports/bringing-dark- patterns-light

    2022

  13. [22]

    Guo Freeman, Samaneh Zamanifard, Divine Maloney, and Dane Acena. 2022. Disturbing the Peace: Experiencing and Mitigating Emerging Harassment in Social Virtual Reality.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction6, CSCW1 (March 2022), 1–30. doi:10.1145/3512932

    2022 doi

  14. [23]

    Kahn, Alan Borning, and Alina Huldtgren

    Batya Friedman, Peter H. Kahn, Alan Borning, and Alina Huldtgren. 2013. Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems. InEarly engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory, Neelke Doorn, Daan Schuurbiers, Ibo van de Poel, and Michael E. Gorman (Eds.). Vol. 16. S...

    2013 doi

  15. [24]

    Grand View Research. 2024.Smart Glasses Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Type (Binocular, Audio), By Operating System (Android, Linux), By Glass Tinting Technology, By Application, By Connectivity, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2025 - 2030. Technical Report. ...

    2024

  16. [25]

    Gray and Shruthi Sai Chivukula

    Colin M. Gray and Shruthi Sai Chivukula. 2019. Ethical Mediation in UX Practice. InProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–11. doi:10.1145/3290605.3300408

    2019

  17. [26]

    Gray, Shruthi Sai Chivukula, Thomas V Carlock, Ziqing Li, and Ja-Nae Duane

    Colin M. Gray, Shruthi Sai Chivukula, Thomas V Carlock, Ziqing Li, and Ja-Nae Duane. 2023. Scaffolding Ethics- Focused Methods for Practice Resonance. InProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, Pittsburgh PA USA, 2375–2391. doi:10.1145/3563657.3596111

    2023

  18. [27]

    Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, and Austin L

    Colin M. Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, and Austin L. Toombs. 2018. The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX Design. InProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Regan Mandryk, Mark Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 9, No. 5, Artic...

    2018

  19. [28]

    Gray, Cristiana Santos, Nataliia Bielova, Michael Toth, and Damian Clifford

    Colin M. Gray, Cristiana Santos, Nataliia Bielova, Michael Toth, and Damian Clifford. 2021. Dark Patterns and the Legal Requirements of Consent Banners: An Interaction Criticism Perspective. InProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Y...

    2021

  20. [29]

    Gray, Cristiana Teixeira Santos, Nataliia Bielova, and Thomas Mildner

    Colin M. Gray, Cristiana Teixeira Santos, Nataliia Bielova, and Thomas Mildner. 2024. An Ontology of Dark Patterns Knowledge: Foundations, Definitions, and a Pathway for Shared Knowledge-Building. InProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(, Hono...

    2024

  21. [30]

    Saul Greenberg, Sebastian Boring, Jo Vermeulen, and Jakub Dostal. 2014. Dark patterns in proxemic interactions: a critical perspective. InProceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 523–532. doi:10.1145/2598510.2598541

    2014

  22. [31]

    Johanna Gunawan, Amogh Pradeep, David Choffnes, Woodrow Hartzog, and Christo Wilson. 2021. A Comparative Study of Dark Patterns Across Web and Mobile Modalities.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction5, CSCW2 (Oct. 2021), 1–29. doi:10.1145/3479521

    2021 doi

  23. [32]

    Hilda Hadan, Lydia Choong, Leah Zhang-Kennedy, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2024. Deceived by Immersion: A Systematic Analysis of Deceptive Design in Extended Reality.Comput. Surveys(April 2024), 3659945. doi:10.1145/3659945

    2024 doi

  24. [33]

    Carter Jernigan and Behram F.T. Mistree. 2009. Gaydar: Facebook friendships expose sexual orientation.First Monday (Sept. 2009). doi:10.5210/fm.v14i10.2611

    2009 doi

  25. [34]

    Qiao Jin, Yu Liu, Svetlana Yarosh, Bo Han, and Feng Qian. 2022. How Will VR Enter University Classrooms? Multi- stakeholders Investigation of VR in Higher Education. InProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(<conf-loc>, <city>New Orleans</c...

    2022 doi

  26. [35]

    Williamson

    Ross Johnstone, Neil McDonnell, and Julie R. Williamson. 2022. When Virtuality Surpasses Reality: Possible Futures of Ubiquitous XR. InCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–8. doi:10.1145/3491101.3516396

    2022

  27. [36]

    Hanseob Kim, TaeHyung Kim, Myungho Lee, Gerard Jounghyun Kim, and Jae-In Hwang. 2020. Don’t Bother Me: How to Handle Content-Irrelevant Objects in Handheld Augmented Reality. InProceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST ’20). ACM, 1–...

    2020

  28. [37]

    Jooyoung Kim. 2021. Advertising in the Metaverse: Research Agenda.Journal of Interactive Advertising21, 3 (Sept. 2021), 141–144. doi:10.1080/15252019.2021.2001273

    2021

  29. [38]

    Minsam Ko, Subin Yang, Joonwon Lee, Christian Heizmann, Jinyoung Jeong, Uichin Lee, Daehee Shin, Koji Yatani, Junehwa Song, and Kyong-Mee Chung. 2015. NUGU: A Group-based Intervention App for Improving Self-Regulation of Limiting Smartphone Use. (2015), 1235–1245. doi:10.1145/...

    2015

  30. [39]

    Oswald Kothgassner, A Felnhofer, N Hauk, E Kastenhofer, J Gomm, and I Krysprin-Exner. 2013. Technology Usage Inven- tory. https://www.ffg.at/sites/default/files/allgemeine_downloads/thematische%20programme/programmdokumente/ tui_manual.pdf.Manual. Wien: ICARUS17, 04 (2013), 90...

    2013

  31. [40]

    Gergely Kotyuk and Levente Buttyan. 2012. A machine learning based approach for predicting undisclosed attributes in social networks. In2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops. IEEE, Lugano, Switzerland, 361–366. doi:10.1109/PerCo...

    2012

  32. [41]

    Gunawan, David Choffnes, Daniel J Dubois, Woodrow Hartzog, and Christo Wilson

    Monica Kowalczyk, Johanna T. Gunawan, David Choffnes, Daniel J Dubois, Woodrow Hartzog, and Christo Wilson

  33. [42]

    Veronika Krauss, Pejman Saeghe, Alexander Boden, Mohamed Khamis, Mark McGill, Jan Gugenheimer, and Michael Nebeling. 2024. What Makes XR Dark? Examining Emerging Dark Patterns in Augmented and Virtual Reality through Expert Co-Design.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interact...

    2024 doi

  34. [43]

    Eun-Ju Lee. 2008. Flattery may get computers somewhere, sometimes: The moderating role of output modality, computer gender, and user gender.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies66, 11 (Nov. 2008), 789–800. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.07.009

    2008 doi

  35. [44]

    Jamie Luguri and Lior Jacob Strahilevitz. 2021. Shining a Light on Dark Patterns.Journal of Legal Analysis13, 1 (March 2021), 43–109. doi:10.1093/jla/laaa006

    2021 doi

  36. [45]

    Gray, Arunesh Mathur, and Shruthi Sai Chivukula

    Kai Lukoff, Alexis Hiniker, Colin M. Gray, Arunesh Mathur, and Shruthi Sai Chivukula. 2021. What Can CHI Do About Dark Patterns?. InExtended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–6. doi:10.1145/3411763.3441360

    2021

  37. [46]

    Adaptable Commitment Interfaces

    Kai Lukoff, Ulrik Lyngs, Karina Shirokova, Raveena Rao, Larry Tian, Himanshu Zade, Sean A. Munson, and Alexis Hiniker. 2023. SwitchTube: A Proof-of-Concept System Introducing “Adaptable Commitment Interfaces” as a Tool for Digital Wellbeing. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Confe...

    2023

  38. [47]

    Friedman, Eli Lucherini, Jonathan Mayer, Marshini Chetty, and Arvind Narayanan

    Arunesh Mathur, Gunes Acar, Michael J. Friedman, Eli Lucherini, Jonathan Mayer, Marshini Chetty, and Arvind Narayanan. 2019. Dark Patterns at Scale: Findings from a Crawl of 11K Shopping Websites.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1–32. do...

    2019 doi

  39. [48]

    Arunesh Mathur, Mihir Kshirsagar, and Jonathan Mayer. 2021. What Makes a Dark Pattern... Dark?: Design Attributes, Normative Considerations, and Measurement Methods. InProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–18. doi:...

    2021

  40. [49]

    2026.Hyper-Reality

    Keiichi Matsuda. 2026.Hyper-Reality. Retrieved Jul 8, 2024 from http://hyper-reality.co/

    2026

  41. [50]

    Luca-Maxim Meinhardt, Jan-Henry Belz, Michael Rietzler, and Enrico Rukzio. 2023. Balancing the Digital and the Physical: Discussing Push and Pull Factors for Digital Well-being. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2305.12513 Version Number: 1

    2023 doi arXiv

  42. [51]

    2025.Orion AI Glasses

    Meta. 2025.Orion AI Glasses. Retrieved April 16, 2025 from https://about.meta.com/realitylabs/orion/

    2025

  43. [52]

    Abraham Hani Mhaidli and Florian Schaub. 2021. Identifying Manipulative Advertising Techniques in XR Through Scenario Construction. InProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–18. doi:10.1145/3411764.3445253

    2021

  44. [53]

    Thomas Mildner, Orla Cooney, Anna-Maria Meck, Marion Bartl, Gian-Luca Savino, Philip R Doyle, Diego Garaialde, Leigh Clark, John Sloan, Nina Wenig, Rainer Malaka, and Jasmin Niess. 2024. Listening to the Voices: Describing Ethical Caveats of Conversational User Interfaces Acco...

    2024

  45. [54]

    Doyle, Benjamin R

    Thomas Mildner, Merle Freye, Gian-Luca Savino, Philip R. Doyle, Benjamin R. Cowan, and Rainer Malaka. 2023. Defending Against the Dark Arts: Recognising Dark Patterns in Social Media. InProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, Pittsburgh PA US...

    2023

  46. [55]

    Thomas Mildner and Gian-Luca Savino. 2021. Ethical User Interfaces: Exploring the Effects of Dark Patterns on Facebook. InExtended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yoshifumi Kitamura, Aaron Quigley, Katherine Isbister, and Takeo Igara...

    2021

  47. [56]

    Doyle, Benjamin R

    Thomas Mildner, Gian-Luca Savino, Philip R. Doyle, Benjamin R. Cowan, and Rainer Malaka. 2023. About Engaging and Governing Strategies: A Thematic Analysis of Dark Patterns in Social Networking Services. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Sy...

    2023

  48. [57]

    Paul Milgram, Haruo Takemura, Akira Utsumi, and Fumio Kishino. 1995. Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. InTelemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, Hari Das (Ed.), Vol. 2351. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 28...

    1995 doi

  49. [58]

    Xin Min and Yueyue Qi. 2023. VPModel Pro: New Home Entertainment Experiences for Next-Generation Spatial Computing Platforms. InProceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering. ACM, Xiamen China, 1135–1140. doi...

    2023

  50. [59]

    Alberto Monge Roffarello and Luigi de Russis. 2022. Towards Understanding the Dark Patterns That Steal Our Attention. InExtended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. doi...

    2022

  51. [60]

    Shohei Mori, Sei Ikeda, and Hideo Saito. 2017. A survey of diminished reality: Techniques for visually concealing, eliminating, and seeing through real objects. 9, 1 (2017), 17. doi:10.1186/s41074-017-0028-1

    2017 doi

  52. [61]

    Nguyen, Duyen T

    Tien T. Nguyen, Duyen T. Nguyen, Shamsi T. Iqbal, and Eyal Ofek. 2015. The Known Stranger: Supporting Conversations between Strangers with Personalized Topic Suggestions. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Seoul Republic...

    2015

  53. [62]

    Midas Nouwens, Ilaria Liccardi, Michael Veale, David Karger, and Lalana Kagal. 2020. Dark Patterns after the GDPR: Scraping Consent Pop-ups and Demonstrating their Influence. InProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, ...

    2020

  54. [63]

    Kentrell Owens, Johanna Gunawan, David Choffnes, Pardis Emami-Naeini, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Franziska Roesner

  55. [64]

    Peck, Laura E

    Tabitha C. Peck, Laura E. Sockol, and S. Hancock. 2020. Mind the Gap: The Underrepresentation of Female Participants and Authors in Virtual Reality Research.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics26 (2020), 1945–1954. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2020.2973498

    2020

  56. [65]

    Stephen A. Rains. 2013. The Nature of Psychological Reactance Revisited: A Meta-Analytic Review.Human Communi- cation Research39, 1 (2013), 47–73. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.x

    2013

  57. [66]

    Rauschnabel, Reto Felix, Chris Hinsch, Hamza Shahab, and Florian Alt

    Philipp A. Rauschnabel, Reto Felix, Chris Hinsch, Hamza Shahab, and Florian Alt. 2022. What is XR? Towards a Framework for Augmented and Virtual Reality.Computers in Human Behavior133 (Aug. 2022), 107289. doi:10.1016/j. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 9, No. 5, Article ...

    2022

  58. [67]

    2021.Dating in the metaverse? Tinder’s CEO expresses interest in entering the virtual reality world

    Reuters. 2021.Dating in the metaverse? Tinder’s CEO expresses interest in entering the virtual reality world. Retrieved Jul 9, 2024 from https://www.euronews.com/next/2021/12/03/dating-in-the-metaverse-tinder-s-ceo-expresses-interest- in-entering-the-virtual-reality-wo

    2021

  59. [68]

    Michael Rietzler, Florian Geiselhart, Jan Gugenheimer, and Enrico Rukzio. 2018. Breaking the Tracking: Enabling Weight Perception using Perceivable Tracking Offsets. InProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1–12. ...

    2018

  60. [69]

    Michael Rietzler, Jan Gugenheimer, Teresa Hirzle, Martin Deubzer, Eike Langbehn, and Enrico Rukzio. 2018. Rethinking Redirected Walking: On the Use of Curvature Gains Beyond Perceptual Limitations and Revisiting Bending Gains. In2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and A...

    2018

  61. [70]

    Jan Ole Rixen, Jan Henry Belz, Luca-Maxim Meinhardt, Jan Gugenheimer, and Enrico Rukzio. 2023. Exploring the Effects of Head-Mounted Augmented Reality on Helping Behaviour. InProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM, Vienna Aust...

    2023

  62. [71]

    Jan Ole Rixen, Mark Colley, Ali Askari, Jan Gugenheimer, and Enrico Rukzio. 2022. Consent in the Age of AR: Investigating The Comfort With Displaying Personal Information in Augmented Reality. InProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(New O...

    2022

  63. [72]

    Jan Ole Rixen, Christian Funk, Enrico Rukzio, and Jan Gugenheimer. 2023. May I Still Define Myself? Exploring How Dissonance in Displaying Personal Information Through Head-Mounted Augmented Reality Can Affect Personal Information Sovereignty. InExtended Abstracts of the 2023 ...

    2023

  64. [73]

    Jan Ole Rixen, Teresa Hirzle, Mark Colley, Yannick Etzel, Enrico Rukzio, and Jan Gugenheimer. 2021. Exploring Augmented Visual Alterations in Interpersonal Communication. InProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–11....

    2021

  65. [74]

    Lingareddy, and Marshini Chetty

    Brennan Schaffner, Neha A. Lingareddy, and Marshini Chetty. 2022. Understanding Account Deletion and Relevant Dark Patterns on Social Media.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1–43. doi:10.1145/3555142

    2022 doi

  66. [75]

    Joachim Scholz and Andrew N. Smith. 2016. Augmented reality: Designing immersive experiences that maximize consumer engagement.Business Horizons59, 2 (March 2016), 149–161. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2015.10.003

    2016 doi

  67. [76]

    S. S. Shapiro and M. B. Wilk. 1965. An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples).Biometrika52, 3/4 (1965), 591–611. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2333709

    1965

  68. [77]

    Shiwangi Singh, Gurtej Singh, and Sanjay Dhir. 2024. Impact of digital marketing on the competitiveness of the restaurant industry.Journal of Foodservice Business Research27, 2 (March 2024), 109–137. doi:10.1080/15378020.2022. 2077088

    2024

  69. [78]

    Hall, and Michael Nebeling

    Maximilian Speicher, Brian D. Hall, and Michael Nebeling. 2019. What is Mixed Reality?. InProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Glasgow, Scotland Uk)(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. doi:10.1145/3290...

    2019

  70. [79]

    Haimson, and Danielle Lottridge

    Katta Spiel, Oliver L. Haimson, and Danielle Lottridge. 2019. How to do better with gender on surveys: a guide for HCI researchers.Interactions26, 4, 62–65. doi:10.1145/3338283

    2019 doi

  71. [80]

    Carolin Stellmacher, André Zenner, Oscar Javier Ariza Nunez, Ernst Kruijff, and Johannes Schöning. 2023. Continuous VR Weight Illusion by Combining Adaptive Trigger Resistance and Control-Display Ratio Manipulation. In2023 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces...

    2023

  72. [81]

    Angela Todhri and Pascal Knierim. 2024. From Immersion to Manipulation: Exploring the Prevalence of Dark Patterns in Mixed Reality.USENIX Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS)(2024)

    2024

  73. [82]

    Wen-Jie Tseng, Elise Bonnail, Mark McGill, Mohamed Khamis, Eric Lecolinet, Samuel Huron, and Jan Gugenheimer

  74. [83]

    Christof Van Nimwegen, Kristi Bergman, and Almila Akdag. 2022. Shedding light on assessing Dark Patterns: Introducing the System Darkness Scale (SDS). doi:10.14236/ewic/HCI2022.7

    2022 doi

  75. [84]

    Viswanath Venkatesh and Fred D. Davis. 2000. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.Management Science46, 2 (Feb. 2000), 186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

    2000 doi

  76. [85]

    InCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    The Dark Side of Perceptual Manipulations in Virtual Reality. InCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–15. doi:10.1145/3491102.3517728

  77. [86]

    Xian Wang, Lik-Hang Lee, Carlos Bermejo Fernandez, and Pan Hui. 2023. The Dark Side of Augmented Reality: Exploring Manipulative Designs in AR.International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction(March 2023), 1–16. doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2188799 Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Intera...

    2023

  78. [87]

    Wobbrock, Leah Findlater, Darren Gergle, and James J

    Jacob O. Wobbrock, Leah Findlater, Darren Gergle, and James J. Higgins. 2011. The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 14...

    2011

  79. [88]

    Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2015. Toward a theory of technological mediation.Technoscience and postphenomenology: The Manhattan papers189 (2015)

    2015

  80. [91]

    strongly disagree

    Jacob O. Wobbrock and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. Research Contributions in Human-Computer Interaction.Interactions23, 3 (apr 2016), 38–44. doi:10.1145/2907069 Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 9, No. 5, Article pn5758. Publication date: September 2025. Exploring the Impact of...

    2016 doi

  81. [2022]

    InProceedings of the 2022 European Symposium on Usable Security

    Exploring Deceptive Design Patterns in Voice Interfaces. InProceedings of the 2022 European Symposium on Usable Security. ACM, Karlsruhe Germany, 64–78. doi:10.1145/3549015.3554213

    2022

  82. [2023]

    InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Understanding Dark Patterns in Home IoT Devices. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–27. doi:10.1145/3544548.3581432

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.