Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 131 references

SmoothTurn: Learning to Turn Smoothly for Agile Navigation with Quadrupedal Robots

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A learning framework that makes quadrupedal robots turn smoothly at high speed by training on sequences of goals, not single targets.

desk verdict We only have the SmoothTurn abstract; the supplied full text is a different paper, so the real-robot and emergent-behavior claims cannot be audited. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.12842 v2 pith:3T2FRJG4 submitted 2026-03-13 cs.RO

Zunzhi You , Yunke Wang , Haolan Guo , Chang Xu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.RO
keywords quadrupedalrobotsagilenavigationsequentiallocalsmoothturningreinforcementlearninggoalcurriculumlocomotioncontrolsim-to-real
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

High-speed rescue and inspection missions need robots that can change direction without losing momentum. Most learned controllers only train for one goal at a time and then sit still once they arrive, so they cannot plan the next turn or keep running through a series of waypoints. This paper reframes the job as sequential local navigation and introduces SmoothTurn: a reward that scores progress across a chain of goals, observations that include a short window of upcoming goals, and a curriculum that hardens the goal sequences only as the robot gets better. The resulting policy is claimed to run and turn fluidly, with spontaneous behaviors such as bleeding speed into a turn, aiming the body at the next goal early, and taking efficient paths—and it is said to transfer straight onto real quadrupeds using only onboard sensing and compute.

What carries the argument

SmoothTurn: a learning-based control stack whose three parts—a sequential goal-reaching reward, an observation space expanded by a future-goal lookahead window, and an automatic goal curriculum that grows sequence difficulty with performance—together force the policy to anticipate turns instead of treating each target as a stop.

What would settle it

Run the same robot and hardware stack with a single-goal baseline versus SmoothTurn on matched high-speed multi-waypoint courses; if SmoothTurn does not show measurably smoother turns, higher sustained speed through goal switches, or reliable onboard real-robot success, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

When a quadruped is trained with a sequential goal-reaching reward, a lookahead over future goals, and an automatic curriculum on goal-sequence difficulty, it learns an agile high-speed turning policy for sequential local navigation that maintains momentum across goal switches and can be deployed on real robots with onboard sensors and computation.

Load-bearing premise

The main reason single-goal policies fail at fast sequential turns is that they cannot see the next goals or keep momentum, and adding those three training ingredients is enough to unlock smooth high-speed turning and real-robot transfer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sequential local navigation becomes a practical training objective for agile quadrupeds instead of stitching single-goal policies.
  • Policies can learn to bleed momentum, pre-orient the body, and cut efficient paths without hand-scripted turn controllers.
  • Trained controllers can be dropped onto real quadrupeds with only onboard sensing and compute for multi-waypoint missions.
  • Urgency-driven tasks such as fire rescue and industrial inspection gain a concrete path to high-speed direction changes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sequential-goal plus curriculum recipe may transfer to other platforms that suffer stop-and-turn behavior, such as bipeds or wheeled robots with tight turning constraints.
  • If lookahead length is a first-order knob, short horizons may still fail in cluttered or partially observed maps where the next goals are uncertain.
  • Real deployments will likely need the curriculum and reward to stay robust when goal sequences are generated online by a higher-level planner rather than sampled offline.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The submission is presented as SmoothTurn, a learning-based control framework for agile sequential local navigation on quadrupedal robots. The abstract claims that a sequential goal-reaching reward, a future-goal lookahead observation, and an automatic goal curriculum yield smooth high-speed turning with emergent momentum control, advance facing, and efficient paths, with direct real-robot deployment and supporting simulation and hardware results. The body supplied under this title and arXiv id is instead an unrelated condensed-matter manuscript on a Floquet–Keldysh functional renormalization group for the driven single-impurity Anderson model (frequency-dependent two-particle vertex, benchmarks vs 2PT/GW, Kondo resonance and photo-induced transport). No robotics methods, rewards, curricula, baselines, metrics, or robot experiments appear in the manuscript body.

Significance. If the SmoothTurn claims were substantiated, the work would be of clear interest for high-speed legged navigation under sequential goals. As submitted, those claims cannot be assessed: the manuscript body does not contain the stated framework, experiments, or results. The Floquet-FRG content that is present may be significant in its own field, but it is not the paper under review and cannot support the robotics claims.

major comments (3)
  1. Title/abstract vs body mismatch: the abstract and paper_id describe SmoothTurn (sequential local navigation, sequential goal-reaching reward, lookahead goals, automatic goal curriculum, real quadruped deployment). The full text is a Floquet-Keldysh FRG study of the driven SIAM (Secs. I–V, Eqs. (1)–(79), Appendices A–C). There is no methods section, reward definition, observation design, curriculum, simulation protocol, baseline comparison, or real-robot experiment for SmoothTurn. The central empirical claim is therefore uncheckable from the submitted manuscript.
  2. Load-bearing claim of sim and real-world success: the abstract asserts that SmoothTurn learns smooth turning with emergent momentum control, advance facing, and efficient paths, and deploys with onboard sensing/compute. No figures, tables, metrics, ablations of sequential reward / lookahead / curriculum, or hardware protocol exist in the provided body. Without that evidence the claim cannot be verified or revised within this document.
  3. Weakest methodological assumption cannot be tested: the abstract frames single-goal policies as failing on sequential direction changes for lack of anticipation and momentum, and presents the three SmoothTurn ingredients as the remedy. The manuscript contains no sequential-navigation task definition, no comparison to single-goal policies, and no ablation of those ingredients, so the assumption remains unexamined.
minor comments (2)
  1. arXiv identifiers conflict: the cache labels paper_id 2603.12842 (SmoothTurn) while the body header cites arXiv:2603.12844 (Floquet FRG). The submission package appears corrupted or misassembled.
  2. If the intended robotics manuscript is resubmitted, it should include explicit reward equations, lookahead window length, curriculum schedule, quantitative baselines/ablations, and a real-robot protocol with sensors and compute stack.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation; SmoothTurn is an empirical RL framework whose claims rest on training outcomes, not a self-referential math reduction.

full rationale

The supplied manuscript body is the unrelated Floquet-Keldysh FRG paper (arXiv:2603.12844), so SmoothTurn's methods, equations, ablations, and real-robot protocol cannot be inspected. From the abstract alone the work formulates sequential local navigation, defines a sequential goal-reaching reward, expands the observation with a future-goal lookahead, and uses an automatic goal curriculum; the trained policy is then claimed to exhibit smooth turning and emergent behaviors on the basis of simulation and real-world experiments. None of these steps is a mathematical derivation that reduces a 'prediction' to a fitted constant or to a self-citation by construction. Ordinary ML risks (reward shaping or curriculum tuned until demos look good) exist but are not circularity under the stated criteria, which require an explicit quoteable reduction. Score 0 with empty steps is therefore the honest finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 2 invented entities

Abstract-only review of a learning-based robotics paper. Load-bearing content is empirical: RL training assumptions, reward/curriculum design choices, and sim-to-real transfer. Free parameters (reward weights, lookahead length, curriculum thresholds) are implied but not quantified in the abstract. No new physical entities are postulated; the invented pieces are algorithmic constructs.

free parameters (3)
  • sequential goal-reaching reward weights / shaping terms
    Abstract introduces a novel sequential goal-reaching reward; coefficients and shaping details are free design choices that typically determine whether smooth turning emerges.
  • lookahead window length for future goals
    Expanded observation space with a lookahead window; horizon length is a free hyperparameter affecting anticipation and partial observability.
  • automatic goal curriculum difficulty schedule / performance thresholds
    Curriculum expands difficulty based on goal-reaching performance; thresholds and sampling rules are free parameters that control training success.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Single-goal policies that encourage staying at the target after arrival cannot anticipate sequential maneuvers or maintain momentum across goal switches.
    Stated as the failure mode of prior work in the abstract; this diagnosis motivates the whole method.
  • domain assumption A policy trained in simulation with the proposed reward, observations, and curriculum transfers to real quadrupeds with onboard sensors and compute.
    Direct real-robot deployment is claimed; sim-to-real transfer is an unproven premise from the abstract alone.
  • domain assumption Standard model-free RL optimization of a goal-conditioned locomotion policy is a valid route to agile sequential navigation.
    Implicit methodological background for learning-based control frameworks of this type.
invented entities (2)
  • SmoothTurn control framework
    purpose: Package sequential reward, future-goal lookahead, and automatic goal curriculum into a deployable agile turning policy.
    Named contribution of the paper; algorithmic construct rather than a physical entity.
  • sequential goal-reaching reward
    purpose: Score multi-goal progress so the policy maintains momentum and turns smoothly across goal switches.
    Described as novel in the abstract; form not given beyond purpose.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SmoothTurn: Learning to Turn Smoothly for Agile Navigation with Quadrupedal Robots." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3T2FRJG4

@misc{pith2026260312842,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SmoothTurn: Learning to Turn Smoothly for Agile Navigation with Quadrupedal Robots},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3T2FRJG4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.12842}
}
read the original abstract

Quadrupedal robots show great potential for valuable real-world applications such as fire rescue and industrial inspection. Such applications often require urgency and the ability to navigate agilely, which in turn demands the capability to change directions smoothly while running in high speed. Existing approaches for agile navigation typically learn a single-goal reaching policy by encouraging the robot to stay at the target position after reaching there. As a result, when the policy is used to reach sequential goals that require changing directions, it cannot anticipate upcoming maneuvers or maintain momentum across the switch of goals, thereby preventing the robot from fully exploiting its agility potential. In this work, we formulate the task as sequential local navigation, extending the single-goal-conditioned local navigation formulation in prior work. We then introduce SmoothTurn, a learning-based control framework that learns to turn smoothly while running rapidly for agile sequential local navigation. The framework adopts a novel sequential goal-reaching reward, an expanded observation space with a lookahead window for future goals, and an automatic goal curriculum that progressively expands the difficulty of sampled goal sequences based on the goal-reaching performance. The trained policy can be directly deployed on real quadrupedal robots with onboard sensors and computation. Both simulation and real-world empirical results show that SmoothTurn learns an agile locomotion policy that performs smooth turning across goals, with emergent behaviors such as controlling momentum when switching goals, facing towards the future goal in advance, and planning efficient paths.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    channel-native

    Channel decomposition Following Ref. [60], we approximate the two-particle vertex as a frequency decomposition into the three “channel-native” components and only keep the depen- dency on the respective bosonic frequencies Γ1′2′|12 Λ (ωP , ωC, ωD)≈Γ 1′2′|12 0 +P 1′2′|12 Λ (ωP ) +C 1′2′|12 Λ (ωC) +D 1′2′|12 Λ (ωD), (48) whereΓ 0 = ΓΛ→∞ is the initial value...

  2. [2]

    Benchmarking these cheaper approxi- mations will give a good estimate of whether one can expect good results using them on extended systems, as well

    Additional approximations As we develop this framework with the goal in mind to eventually simulate extended systems and real quantum materials under Floquet driving, we also test additional approximations. Benchmarking these cheaper approxi- mations will give a good estimate of whether one can expect good results using them on extended systems, as well. ...

  3. [3]

    The extensive discussion in Ref

    Hybridization flow The truncation of the flow equations causes the choice of the regulator, which should in principle be arbi- trary, to become relevant. The extensive discussion in Ref. [59] showed that causality and grand-canonical en- semble statistics might be altered in unphysical ways if one considers, for example, sharp cutoff schemes, as it is fre...

  4. [4]

    Then, the Green’s functions reduce to a single number per Keldysh component, frequency point, and Floquet index

    Spin summation for theSU(2)-symmetric SIAM In the case of the SIAM with no external magnetic field and metallic leads, we can also solve the sum- mation over spin indices explicitly to further simplify the flow equations. Then, the Green’s functions reduce to a single number per Keldysh component, frequency point, and Floquet index. For the vertices, we k...

  5. [5]

    The SCHF approximation aims at a self-consistent solution of only the Hartree and Fock diagrams, which leads to a frequency-independent self- energy

    Self-consistent Hartree-Fock Both the 2PT and the FRG require a self-consistent Hartree-Fock (SCHF) computation as the initial value for the self-energy. The SCHF approximation aims at a self-consistent solution of only the Hartree and Fock diagrams, which leads to a frequency-independent self- energy. In Ref. [50] a Floquet FRG scheme was intro- duced th...

  6. [6]

    (55) to obtain the particle-hole susceptibility

    Bare second order perturbation theory We implement the bare 2PT by starting with a SCHF computation and subsequently dress the Green’s func- tions withΣ H to compute the non-differentiated version of Eq. (55) to obtain the particle-hole susceptibility. The vertex in 2PT is given by Eq. (59) (plugging in the full susceptibility) and setting ˆX= 0, i.e., on...

  7. [7]

    (59)-(62) without channel-mixing

    Random-phase approximation It is possible to relate the FRG flow equations to the RPA by keeping the self-energy fixed at the Hartree level and only flowing Eqs. (59)-(62) without channel-mixing. One can then solve the integral overΛanalytically to obtain the geometric series known from the ladder ap- proximation. In the particle-hole channel, this yields...

  8. [8]

    GW approximation Within the GW approximation, we enforce both self- consistency of the full frequency-dependent self-energy and incorporate screening effects by writing diagrams in- cluding the 2PT vertex instead of the bare vertex. Al- though the GW approximation as implemented here is derived from Hedin’s equations [55, 106] as a conserv- ing approximat...

Show all 131 references
  1. [9]

    stitching

    Representation of Floquet Green’s functions To obtain the Floquet Green’s function in single index form, one needs to first generate them in double index formfromEqs.(36), whichonlyrequiresknowledgeofthe Fourier coefficients of the time-dependent system Hamil- tonian. As the F...

  2. [10]

    Efficient integration of Floquet susceptibilities To compute the susceptibilities in Eqs. (55)-(58) in a memory- and compute-efficient way, we utilize the previously introduced frequency grids and extrapolation schemes to set up an adaptive quadrature routine that linearly int...

  3. [11]

    FRG” denotes the frequency-dependent FRG without inter-channel mixing that is used for the main text results. “mFRG

    Numerical parameters In order to adequately resolve all features on the real frequency axis, we set the frequency grid resolution to Nω = 201with the scale factorB= 15. In the FRG scheme, we initialize the flow atΛ ini = 10.0with the SCHF dressed RPA solution and then flow toΛ...

  4. [12]

    D. N. Basov, R. D. Averitt, and D. Hsieh, Towards prop- erties on demand in quantum materials, Nature Mate- rials16, 1077 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonther- mal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    C. Bao, P. Tang, D. Sun, and S. Zhou, Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2d materials and topological materials, Nature Reviews Physics4, 33 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Oka and H

    T. Oka and H. Aoki, Photovoltaic hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B79, 081406 (2009)

    2009

  8. [16]

    J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F.-U. Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced anomalous hall effect in graphene, Nature Physics16, 38 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quan- tum materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics10, 387 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    S. A. Sato, J. W. McIver, M. Nuske, P. Tang, G. Jotzu, B. Schulte, H. Hübener, U. De Giovannini, L. Mathey, M. A. Sentef, A. Cavalleri, and A. Rubio, Microscopic theory for the light-induced anomalous hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B99, 214302 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    G. E. Topp, G. Jotzu, J. W. McIver, L. Xian, A. Ru- bio, and M. A. Sentef, Topological floquet engineering of twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 023031 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Y. H. Wang, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N.Gedik,Observationoffloquet-blochstatesonthesur- face of a topological insulator, Science342, 453 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    G. Usaj, P. M. Perez-Piskunow, L. E. F. Foa Torres, and C. A. Balseiro, Irradiated graphene as a tunable floquet topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B90, 115423 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Rodriguez-Vega, M

    M. Rodriguez-Vega, M. Vogl, and G. A. Fiete, Low- frequency and moiré–floquet engineering: A review, An- nals of Physics435, 168434 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    M. W. Day, K. Kusyak, F. Sturm, J. I. Aranzadi, H. M. Bretscher, M. Fechner, T. Matsuyama, M. H. Michael, B. F. Schulte, X. Li, J. Hagelstein, D. Her- rmann, G. Kipp, A. M. Potts, J. M. DeStefano, C. Hu, Y. Huang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, G. Meier, D. Shin, A. Rubio, J.-H. C...

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Merboldt, M

    M. Merboldt, M. Schüler, D. Schmitt, J. P. Bange, W. Bennecke, K. Gadge, K. Pierz, H. W. Schumacher, D. Momeni, D. Steil, S. R. Manmana, M. A. Sentef, M. Reutzel, and S. Mathias, Observation of floquet states in graphene, Nature Physics21, 1093 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Boschini, M

    F. Boschini, M. Zonno, and A. Damascelli, Time- resolved ARPES studies of quantum materials, Reviews of Modern Physics96, 015003 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    J. H. Mentink, K. Balzer, and M. Eckstein, Ultrafast and reversible control of the exchange interaction in mott insulators, Nature Communications6(2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Claassen, H.-C

    M. Claassen, H.-C. Jiang, B. Moritz, and T. P. De- vereaux, Dynamical time-reversal symmetry breaking and photo-induced chiral spin liquids in frustrated Mott insulators, Nature Communications8, 1192 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    Golez, M

    D. Golez, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, Multiband nonequilibriumgw+EDMFT formalism for correlated insulators, Phys. Rev. B100, 235117 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Sarkar, Z

    M. Sarkar, Z. Lenarcic, and D. Golez, Floquet engineer- ing of binding in doped and photo-doped mott insula- tors, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033331 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    V. L. Quito and R. Flint, Polarization as a tuning pa- rameter for floquet engineering: Magnetism in the hon- eycomb, square, and triangular mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B103, 134435 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Stojchevska, I

    L. Stojchevska, I. Vaskivskyi, T. Mertelj, P. Kusar, D. Svetin, S. Brazovskii, and D. Mihailovic, Ultrafast SwitchingtoaStableHiddenQuantumStateinanElec- tronic Crystal, Science344, 177 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    Maklar, J

    J. Maklar, J. Sarkar, S. Dong, Y. A. Gerasimenko, T. Pincelli, S. Beaulieu, P. S. Kirchmann, J. A. Sob- ota, S. Yang, D. Leuenberger, R. G. Moore, Z.-X. Shen, M. Wolf, D. Mihailovic, R. Ernstorfer, and L. Rettig, Coherent light control of a metastable hidden state, Sci- ence A...

    2023

  25. [33]

    D. R. Baykusheva, D. P. Carmichael, C. S. Weber, I.-T. Lu, F. Glerean, T. Meng, P. B. M. D. Oliveira, C. C. Homes, I. A. Zaliznyak, G. D. Gu, M. P. M. Dean, A. Rubio, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, and M. Mi- trano, Quantum control of Hubbard excitons (2026), arXiv:2601.20695 [cond-mat]

    2026

  26. [34]

    Fausti, R

    D. Fausti, R. I. Tobey, N. Dean, S. Kaiser, A. Dienst, M. C. Hoffmann, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, and A. Cavalleri, Light-Induced Superconductivity in a Stripe-Ordered Cuprate, Science331, 189 (2011)

    2011

  27. [35]

    B. Liu, M. Först, M. Fechner, D. Nicoletti, J. Porras, T. Loew, B. Keimer, and A. Cavalleri, Pump Frequency Resonances for Light-Induced Incipient Superconduc- tivity inYBa 2Cu3O6.5, Physical Review X10, 011053 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    M. A. Sentef, A. F. Kemper, A. Georges, and C. Kol- lath, Theory of light-enhanced phonon-mediated super- conductivity, Phys. Rev. B93, 144506 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    D. M. Kennes, E. Y. Wilner, D. R. Reichman, and A. J. Millis, Transient superconductivity from electronic squeezing of optically pumped phonons, Nature Physics 13, 479 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    D.Kennes, A.delaTorre, A.Ron, D.Hsieh,andA.Mil- lis, Floquet engineering in quantum chains, Physical Re- view Letters120, 127601 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, M. A. Sentef, and C. Kar- rasch, Light-inducedd-wave superconductivity through floquet-engineered fermi surfaces in cuprates, Phys. Rev. B100, 075115 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Decker, C

    K. Decker, C. Karrasch, J. Eisert, and D. Kennes, Flo- quet engineering topological many-body localized sys- tems, Physical Review Letters124, 190601 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Buzzi, D

    M. Buzzi, D. Nicoletti, M. Fechner, N. Tancogne- Dejean, M. A. Sentef, A. Georges, T. Biesner, E. Uykur, M. Dressel, A. Henderson, T. Siegrist, J. A. Schlueter, K. Miyagawa, K. Kanoda, M.-S. Nam, A. Ardavan, J. Coulthard, J. Tindall, F. Schlawin, D. Jaksch, and A. Cavalleri, P...

    2020

  34. [42]

    Takahashi, H

    Y. Takahashi, H. Miyamoto, K. Kuroki, and T. Kaneko, Floquet engineering of effective pairing interactions in a doped band insulator, Phys. Rev. B111, 125104 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Sheikhan and C

    A. Sheikhan and C. Kollath, Dynamically enhanced un- conventional superconducting correlations in a hubbard ladder, Phys. Rev. B102, 035163 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    O. Hart, G. Goldstein, C. Chamon, and C. Castelnovo, Steady-state superconductivity in electronic materials with repulsive interactions, Phys. Rev. B100, 060508 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Y. Wang, T. Shi, and C.-C. Chen, Fluctuating nature of light-enhancedd-wave superconductivity: A time- dependent variational non-gaussian exact diagonaliza- tion study, Phys. Rev. X11, 041028 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    B103,064508(2021)

    U.KumarandS.-Z.Lin,Inducingandcontrollingsuper- conductivity in the hubbard honeycomb model using an electromagneticdrive,Phys.Rev. B103,064508(2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Dehghani, M

    H. Dehghani, M. Hafezi, and P. Ghaemi, Light-induced topological superconductivity via floquet interaction en- gineering, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023039 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Li, C.-H

    Z.-Z. Li, C.-H. Lam, and J. Q. You, Floquet engineer- ing of long-rangep-wave superconductivity: Beyond the high-frequency limit, Phys. Rev. B96, 155438 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Ning, D.-S

    Z. Ning, D.-S. Ma, J. Zeng, D.-H. Xu, and R. Wang, Flexible control of chiral superconductivity in optically driven nodal point superconductors with antiferromag- netism, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 246606 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Sheikhan and C

    A. Sheikhan and C. Kollath, Floquet topological super- conductivity induced by chiral many-body interaction, Communications Physics5, 174 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Tsuji and H

    N. Tsuji and H. Aoki, Theory of anderson pseudospin resonance with higgs mode in superconductors, Phys. Rev. B92, 064508 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    Dasari and M

    N. Dasari and M. Eckstein, Transient floquet engi- neering of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B98, 235149 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    M. A. Sentef, Light-enhanced electron-phonon coupling from nonlinear electron-phonon coupling, Phys. Rev. B 95, 205111 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    M. Knap, M. Babadi, G. Refael, I. Martin, and E. Demler, Dynamical cooper pairing in nonequilib- rium electron-phonon systems, Phys. Rev. B94, 214504 (2016)

    2016

  47. [55]

    Murakami, N

    Y. Murakami, N. Tsuji, M. Eckstein, and P. Werner, Nonequilibrium steady states and transient dynamics of conventional superconductors under phonon driving, Phys. Rev. B96, 045125 (2017)

    2017

  48. [56]

    H. P. Ojeda Collado, G. Usaj, C. A. Balseiro, D. H. Zanette, and J. Lorenzana, Emergent parametric res- onances and time-crystal phases in driven bardeen- cooper-schrieffer systems, Phys. Rev. Res.3, L042023 (2021). 18

    2021

  49. [57]

    T. Kuhn, B. Sothmann, and J. Cayao, Floquet engineer- ing higgs dynamics in time-periodic superconductors, Phys. Rev. B109, 134517 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Hanson, L

    R. Hanson, L. P. Kouwenhoven, J. R. Petta, S. Tarucha, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Spins in few-electron quan- tum dots, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 1217 (2007)

    2007

  51. [59]

    M. F. Ludovico, L. Arrachea, M. Moskalets, and D. Sánchez, Periodic energy transport and entropy production in quantum electronics, Entropy18, 10.3390/e18110419 (2016)

    2016 doi

  52. [60]

    Haughian, H

    P. Haughian, H. H. Yap, J. Gong, and T. L. Schmidt, Chargepumpinginstronglycoupledmolecularquantum dots, Phys. Rev. B96, 195432 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    A. K. Eissing, V. Meden, and D. M. Kennes, Functional renormalization group in floquet space, Phys. Rev. B 94, 245116 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    A. K. Eissing, V. Meden, and D. M. Kennes, Renormal- ization in Periodically Driven Quantum Dots, Physical Review Letters116, 026801 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Physical Review Letters69, 2863 (1992)

    1992

  56. [64]

    S. R. White and A. E. Feiguin, Real-time evolution using the density matrix renormalization group, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 076401 (2004)

    2004

  57. [65]

    Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics326, 96 (2011)

    U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics326, 96 (2011)

    2011

  58. [66]

    Schlünzen, S

    N. Schlünzen, S. Hermanns, M. Scharnke, and M. Bonitz, Ultrafast dynamics of strongly correlated fermions—nonequilibrium green functions and selfen- ergy approximations, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter32, 103001 (2019)

    2019

  59. [67]

    Schüler, D

    M. Schüler, D. Golez, Y. Murakami, N. Bittner, A. Her- rmann, H.U.Strand, P.Werner,andM.Eckstein,Nessi: The non-equilibrium systems simulation package, Com- puter Physics Communications257, 107484 (2020)

    2020

  60. [68]

    H. Aoki, N. Tsuji, M. Eckstein, M. Kollar, T. Oka, and P. Werner, Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory and its applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 779 (2014)

    2014

  61. [69]

    Karrasch, R

    C. Karrasch, R. Hedden, R. Peters, T. Pruschke, K. Schönhammer, and V. Meden, A finite-frequency functional renormalization group approach to the sin- gle impurity anderson model, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter20, 345205 (2008)

    2008

  62. [70]

    Jakobs, Functional renormalization group studies of quantum transport through mesoscopic systems, PhD thesis, RWTH Aachen University (2010)

    S. Jakobs, Functional renormalization group studies of quantum transport through mesoscopic systems, PhD thesis, RWTH Aachen University (2010)

    2010

  63. [71]

    S. G. Jakobs, M. Pletyukhov, and H. Schoeller, Nonequilibrium functional renormalization group with frequency-dependent vertex function: A study of the single-impurity anderson model, Phys. Rev. B81, 195109 (2010)

    2010

  64. [72]

    D. M. Kennes, S. G. Jakobs, C. Karrasch, and V. Meden, Renormalization group approach to time- dependent transport through correlated quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B85, 085113 (2012)

    2012

  65. [73]

    Ono and S

    A. Ono and S. Ishihara, Photocontrol of magnetic struc- ture in an itinerant magnet, Phys. Rev. B98, 214408 (2018)

    2018

  66. [74]

    A.OnoandS.Ishihara,Nonequilibriumsusceptibilityin photoinduced floquet states, Phys. Rev. B100, 075127 (2019)

    2019

  67. [75]

    Klebl, D

    L. Klebl, D. M. Kennes, and C. Honerkamp, Functional renormalization group for a large moiré unit cell, Phys. Rev. B102, 085109 (2020)

    2020

  68. [76]

    J. B. Profe and D. M. Kennes, Tu2frg: a scalable ap- proach for truncated unity functional renormalization group in generic fermionic models, The European Phys- ical Journal B95(2022)

    2022

  69. [77]

    Hille, F

    C. Hille, F. B. Kugler, C. J. Eckhardt, Y.-Y. He, A. Kauch, C. Honerkamp, A. Toschi, and S. Ander- gassen, Quantitative functional renormalization group description of the two-dimensional hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033372 (2020)

    2020

  70. [78]

    A. C. Hewson,The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions, Cambridge Studies in Magnetism (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 1993)

    1993

  71. [79]

    Pustilnik and L

    M. Pustilnik and L. Glazman, Kondo effect in quantum dots, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter16, R513 (2004)

    2004

  72. [80]

    Kaminski, Yu

    A. Kaminski, Yu. V. Nazarov, and L. I. Glazman, Sup- pression of the Kondo Effect in a Quantum Dot by External Irradiation, Physical Review Letters83, 384 (1999)

    1999

  73. [81]

    Kaminski, Yu

    A. Kaminski, Yu. V. Nazarov, and L. I. Glazman, Uni- versality of the Kondo effect in a quantum dot out of equilibrium, Physical Review B62, 8154 (2000)

    2000

  74. [82]

    Latta, F

    C. Latta, F. Haupt, M. Hanl, A. Weichselbaum, M. Claassen, W. Wuester, P. Fallahi, S. Faelt, L. Glaz- man, J. von Delft, H. E. Türeci, and A. Imamoglu, Quantum quench of Kondo correlations in optical ab- sorption, Nature474, 627 (2011)

    2011

  75. [83]

    H. T. M. Nghiem and T. A. Costi, Time Evolution of theKondoResonanceinResponsetoaQuench,Physical Review Letters119, 156601 (2017)

    2017

  76. [84]

    Kanász-Nagy, Y

    M. Kanász-Nagy, Y. Ashida, T. Shi, C. P. Moca, T. N. Ikeda, S. Fölling, J. I. Cirac, G. Zaránd, and E. A. Dem- ler,ExploringtheanisotropicKondomodelinandoutof equilibrium with alkaline-earth atoms, Physical Review B97, 155156 (2018)

    2018

  77. [85]

    L. E. Bruhat, J. J. Viennot, M. C. Dartiailh, M. M. Desjardins, A. Cottet, and T. Kontos, Scaling laws of the Kondo problem at finite frequency, Physical Review B98, 075121 (2018)

    2018

  78. [86]

    Krivenko, J

    I. Krivenko, J. Kleinhenz, G. Cohen, and E. Gull, Dynamics of Kondo voltage splitting after a quantum quench, Physical Review B100, 201104 (2019)

    2019

  79. [87]

    Bruch, M

    V. Bruch, M. Pletyukhov, H. Schoeller, and D. M. Kennes, Floquet renormalization group approach to the periodically driven kondo model, Phys. Rev. B106, 115440 (2022)

    2022

  80. [88]

    P. W. Anderson, Localized magnetic states in metals, Phys. Rev.124, 41 (1961)

    1961

  81. [89]

    H. R. Krishna-murthy, J. W. Wilkins, and K. G. Wil- son, Renormalization-group approach to the anderson model of dilute magnetic alloys. i. static properties for the symmetric case, Phys. Rev. B21, 1003 (1980)

    1980

  82. [90]

    H.R.Krishna-murthy, J.W.Wilkins,andK.G.Wilson, Renormalization-group approach to the anderson model of dilute magnetic alloys. ii. static properties for the asymmetric case, Phys. Rev. B21, 1044 (1980)

    1980

  83. [91]

    Peters, T

    R. Peters, T. Pruschke, and F. B. Anders, Numerical renormalization group approach to green’s functions for quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. B74, 245114 (2006). 19

    2006

  84. [92]

    Heidrich-Meisner, A

    F. Heidrich-Meisner, A. E. Feiguin, and E. Dagotto, Real-time simulations of nonequilibrium transport in the single-impurity anderson model, Phys. Rev. B79, 235336 (2009)

    2009

  85. [93]

    A. Ge, N. Ritz, E. Walter, S. Aguirre, J. von Delft, and F. B. Kugler, Real-frequency quantum field theory applied to the single-impurity anderson model, Phys. Rev. B109, 115128 (2024)

    2024

  86. [94]

    L. V. Keldysh, Diagram Technique for Nonequilibrium Processes, Sov. Phys. JETP20, 1018 (1965)

    1965

  87. [95]

    Rammer and H

    J. Rammer and H. Smith, Quantum field-theoretical methods in transport theory of metals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 323 (1986)

    1986

  88. [96]

    S. G. Jakobs, M. Pletyukhov, and H. Schoeller, Proper- ties of multi-particle green’s and vertex functions within keldysh formalism, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical43, 103001 (2010)

    2010

  89. [97]

    Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    A. Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  90. [98]

    J. F. Rentrop, S. G. Jakobs, and V. Meden, Nonequilib- rium transport through a josephson quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B89, 235110 (2014)

    2014

  91. [99]

    T. D. Honeychurch and D. S. Kosov, Floquet nonequi- librium green’s functions with fluctuation-exchange ap- proximation: Application to periodically driven capaci- tively coupled quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B110, 165420 (2024)

    2024

  92. [100]

    Metzner, M

    W. Metzner, M. Salmhofer, C. Honerkamp, V. Meden, and K. Schönhammer, Functional renormalization group approach to correlated fermion systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 299 (2012)

    2012

  93. [101]

    Kopiez, L

    P. Kopiez, L. Bartosch, and F. Schütz,Introduction to the Functional Renormalization Group(Springer Berlin, 2012)

    2012

  94. [102]

    Honerkamp, D

    C. Honerkamp, D. Rohe, S. Andergassen, and T. Enss, Interaction flow method for many-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B70, 235115 (2004)

    2004

  95. [103]

    K. G. Wilson and J. Kogut, The renormalization group and theϵexpansion, Physics Reports12, 75 (1974)

    1974

  96. [104]

    Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Physics Letters B301, 90 (1993)

    C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Physics Letters B301, 90 (1993)

    1993

  97. [105]

    Salmhofer and C

    M. Salmhofer and C. Honerkamp, Fermionic renormal- ization group flows: Technique and theory, Progress of Theoretical Physics105, 1 (2001)

    2001

  98. [106]

    A. A. Katanin, Fulfillment of ward identities in the func- tional renormalization group approach, Phys. Rev. B 70, 115109 (2004)

    2004

  99. [107]

    E. E. Salpeter and H. A. Bethe, A relativistic equation for bound-state problems, Phys. Rev.84, 1232 (1951)

    1951

  100. [108]

    R. M. Martin, L. Reining, and D. M. Ceperley, RPA and beyond: the Bethe–Salpeter equation, inInteract- ing Electrons: Theory and Computational Approaches (Cambridge University Press, 2016) p. 345–388

    2016

  101. [109]

    J. A. White, Self-consistent green functions for the an- derson impurity model, Phys. Rev. B45, 1100 (1992)

    1992

  102. [110]

    Baym and L

    G. Baym and L. P. Kadanoff, Conservation laws and correlation functions, Phys. Rev.124, 287 (1961)

    1961

  103. [111]

    Bickers and D

    N. Bickers and D. Scalapino, Conserving approxima- tions for strongly fluctuating electron systems. i. for- malism and calculational approach, Annals of Physics 193, 206 (1989)

    1989

  104. [112]

    N. E. Bickers and S. R. White, Conserving approxima- tions for strongly fluctuating electron systems. ii. nu- merical results and parquet extension, Phys. Rev. B43, 8044 (1991)

    1991

  105. [113]

    J. B. Profe, D. M. Kennes, and L. Klebl, divERGe im- plements various Exact Renormalization Group exam- ples, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 26 (2024)

    2024

  106. [114]

    Andergassen, T

    S. Andergassen, T. Enss, V. Meden, W. Metzner, U. Schollwöck, and K. Schönhammer, Functional renor- malization group for luttinger liquids with impurities, Phys. Rev. B70, 075102 (2004)

    2004

  107. [115]

    Meden, Correlation effects on electronic transport through dots and wires, inAdvances in Solid State Physics(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,

    V. Meden, Correlation effects on electronic transport through dots and wires, inAdvances in Solid State Physics(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,

  108. [116]

    Herre, T

    J.-N. Herre, T. Okugawa, A. Fischer, C. Karrasch, and D. M. Kennes, Floquet engineering magnetism and su- perconductivity in the square-lattice Hubbard model (2025), arXiv:2511.11798 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025

  109. [117]

    Hedin, New method for calculating the one-particle green’s function with application to the electron-gas problem, Phys

    L. Hedin, New method for calculating the one-particle green’s function with application to the electron-gas problem, Phys. Rev.139, A796 (1965)

    1965

  110. [118]

    X.Wang, C.D.Spataru, M.S.Hybertsen,andA.J.Mil- lis, Electronic correlation in nanoscale junctions: Com- parison of the gw approximation to a numerically exact solution of the single-impurity anderson model, Phys. Rev. B77, 045119 (2008)

    2008

  111. [119]

    Shinaoka, M

    H. Shinaoka, M. Wallerberger, Y. Murakami, K. No- gaki, R. Sakurai, P. Werner, and A. Kauch, Multiscale space-time ansatz for correlation functions of quantum systems based on quantics tensor trains, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021015 (2023)

    2023

  112. [120]

    M. K. Ritter, Y. Núñez Fernández, M. Wallerberger, J. von Delft, H. Shinaoka, and X. Waintal, Quantics tensor cross interpolation for high-resolution parsimo- nious representations of multivariate functions, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 056501 (2024)

    2024

  113. [121]

    Rohshap, M

    S. Rohshap, M. K. Ritter, H. Shinaoka, J. von Delft, M. Wallerberger, and A. Kauch, Two-particle calcula- tions with quantics tensor trains: Solving the parquet equations, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023087 (2025)

    2025

  114. [122]

    Zlatić and B

    V. Zlatić and B. Horvatić, Series expansion for the sym- metric anderson hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. B28, 6904 (1983)

    1983

  115. [123]

    Andergassen, T

    S. Andergassen, T. Enss, C. Karrasch, and V. Meden, A gentle introduction to the functional renormalization group: The kondo effect in quantum dots, inQuantum Magnetism,editedbyB.Barbara, Y.Imry, G.Sawatzky, and P. C. E. Stamp (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht,

  116. [124]

    Sonner, V

    M. Sonner, V. Link, and D. A. Abanin, Semigroup in- fluence matrices for nonequilibrium quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 170402 (2025)

    2025

  117. [125]

    Tsuji, T

    N. Tsuji, T. Oka, and H. Aoki, Correlated electron sys- tems periodically driven out of equilibrium: Floquet+ DMFT formalism, Phys. Rev. B78, 235124 (2008)

    2008

  118. [126]

    Affleck and P

    I. Affleck and P. Simon, Detecting the kondo screening cloud around a quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 2854 (2001)

    2001

  119. [127]

    E. S. Sørensen and I. Affleck, Kondo screening cloud around a quantum dot: Large-scale numerical results, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 086601 (2005)

    2005

  120. [128]

    Borda, Kondo screening cloud in a one-dimensional wire: Numerical renormalization group study, Phys

    L. Borda, Kondo screening cloud in a one-dimensional wire: Numerical renormalization group study, Phys. Rev. B75, 041307 (2007)

    2007

  121. [129]

    V. L. Quito and R. Flint, Floquet engineering mul- tichannel kondo physics, Phys. Rev. B108, 155120 20 (2023)

    2023

  122. [130]

    F. B. Kugler and J. von Delft, Multiloop functional renormalization group for general models, Phys. Rev. B97, 035162 (2018)

    2018

  123. [131]

    Klöckner, D

    C. Klöckner, D. M. Kennes, and C. Karrasch, Second- order functional renormalization group approach to quantum wires out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. B102, 235113 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.