Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Are Bias Evaluation Methods Biased ?

As of 22 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 14 of 14 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2506.17111.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2506.17111 v1

Coverage vector

measured 14 of 14 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-15T19:14:19.869371Z

measured 15 of 15 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00

measured 1 of 1 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-03T17:21:32.954400Z

measured 1 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Reference resolution

14 of 14 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy4
unresolved10
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

0
pith, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Outbound references

Observation b37ef874-2d76-44ed-bc4a-1ae02c818d89 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are Bias Evaluation Methods Biased ? Unresolved cited work

Reference 1

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T19:14:20.103787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation b4e7cad5-812a-4962-af16-fa679fdf5a9b · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are Bias Evaluation Methods Biased ? Unresolved cited work

Reference 2

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T19:14:20.089611Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation 1f0f22b0-417c-4f38-b42b-e596edb7f870 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are Bias Evaluation Methods Biased ? Unresolved cited work

Reference 3

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T19:14:20.075387Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation 93f72be4-a85b-4d16-b541-b50bad38d7c7 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are Bias Evaluation Methods Biased ? Unresolved cited work

Reference 4

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T19:14:20.060750Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation c95160e6-4bc7-4a30-9dd0-cedb2b07ff9e · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are Bias Evaluation Methods Biased ? Unresolved cited work

Reference 5

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T19:14:20.046703Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation e73bac0b-3161-41f3-9724-986530a56249 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are Bias Evaluation Methods Biased ? Unresolved cited work

Reference 6

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T19:14:19.953472Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation 7a4a12a5-b6a8-4e11-81b2-30212f5860a0 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Are Bias Evaluation Methods Biased ? Unresolved cited work

Reference 9

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T19:14:20.031785Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation f7ecd6d4-5bd0-41c3-97d7-62acb50d30be · outbound

This paper cites If not, write"None".

Are Bias Evaluation Methods Biased ? If not, write"None"

Reference 10

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T19:14:20.015103Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation 49dcce5d-788b-4fbf-8625-05593c641efb · outbound

This paper cites If not, write"None".

Are Bias Evaluation Methods Biased ? If not, write"None"

Reference 11

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T19:14:20.000294Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation 4dac23be-d87c-4f25-83f8-10a50b52c3d3 · outbound

This paper cites If not, write"None".

Are Bias Evaluation Methods Biased ? If not, write"None"

Reference 12

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T19:14:19.984989Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation ba3c8430-db59-4bd9-9952-54cd8dffb866 · outbound

This paper cites Focus only on whether bias is present, and if so, why.

Are Bias Evaluation Methods Biased ? Focus only on whether bias is present, and if so, why

Reference 13

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T19:14:19.969281Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.

Observation bbc1596f-dd9b-45ad-9750-fe327c3bb696 · outbound

This paper cites GPTBIAS: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Bias in Large Language Models.

Are Bias Evaluation Methods Biased ? GPTBIAS: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Bias in Large Language Models

Reference 2018

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T19:14:19.816141Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a5f6f840-7d9d-4c91-9c2b-e5589bf9f200 · outbound

This paper cites Reducing Sentiment Bias in Language Models via Counterfactual Evaluation.

Are Bias Evaluation Methods Biased ? Reducing Sentiment Bias in Language Models via Counterfactual Evaluation

Reference 2021

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T19:14:19.810578Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 78e7071f-6899-4726-8d4d-245f880fdbe3 · outbound

This paper cites Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey.

Are Bias Evaluation Methods Biased ? Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey

Reference 2024

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T19:14:19.804344Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Pith citing papers

Observation 7f0e60d6-99df-47a2-b403-69f4a8987242 · inbound

Rethinking Query Optimization for Multi-Agent Systems [Vision] cites this paper.

Rethinking Query Optimization for Multi-Agent Systems [Vision] Are Bias Evaluation Methods Biased ?

Reference 80

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-03T17:23:24.063374Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.