REVIEW 1 cited by
Polynomial histopolation on mock-Chebyshev segments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In computational practice, we often encounter situations where only measurements at equally spaced points are available. Using standard polynomial interpolation in such cases can lead to highly inaccurate results due to numerical ill-conditioning of the problem. Several techniques have been developed to mitigate this issue, such as the mock-Chebyshev subset interpolation and the constrained mock-Chebyshev least-squares approximation. The high accuracy and the numerical stability achieved by these techniques motivate us to extend these methods to histopolation, a polynomial interpolation method based on segmental function averages. While classical polynomial interpolation relies on function evaluations at specific nodes, histopolation leverages averages of the function over subintervals. In this work, we introduce three types of mock-Chebyshev approaches for segmental interpolation and theoretically analyse the stability of their Lebesgue constants, which measure the numerical conditioning of the histopolation problem under small perturbations of the segments. We demonstrate that these segmental mock-Chebyshev approaches yield a quasi-optimal logarithmic growth of the Lebesgue constant in relevant scenarios. Additionally, we compare the performance of these new approximation techniques through various numerical experiments.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bivariate polynomial histopolation techniques on Padua, Fekete and Leja triangles
Introduces triangular histopolation and histopolation-regression schemes using Padua, approximate Fekete, and discrete Leja triangle selections, with theory and numerical comparisons.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.