pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23505 · v1 · pith:3Y7WTAUTnew · submitted 2026-06-22 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Fractality-induced photonic topological insulators

Shuming Zhang , Zhaoxin Wu , Lumen Eek , Cristiane Morais Smith , Zhaoju Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 06:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords fractal latticephotonic topological insulatorSierpiński gasketcorner stateshigher-order topologywaveguide arraybreathing KagomeC3 symmetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Uniformly coupled Sierpiński-gasket waveguides form a photonic higher-order topological insulator with corner states induced by fractal geometry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper demonstrates that the self-similar structure of a Sierpiński-gasket lattice can generate topological corner states in a photonic waveguide array using only uniform nearest-neighbor couplings. By applying isospectral reduction, the fractal system maps to an effective breathing Kagome lattice that supports modes with nontrivial C3 rotational symmetry. Experiments show robust localization at corners when excited appropriately, in contrast to bulk spreading in a comparable triangular lattice. The corner states remain stable against certain types of disorder, highlighting the fractal geometry as the source of the topology.

Core claim

The fractal geometry of the Sierpiński-gasket lattice with uniform couplings induces higher-order topological corner states that can be mapped via isospectral reduction to those of a breathing Kagome model, leading to observable robust corner localization in photonic experiments.

What carries the argument

Isospectral reduction mapping the Sierpiński-gasket lattice to an effective breathing Kagome model

If this is right

  • Corner states are selectively excited using a weakly coupled detuned auxiliary waveguide.
  • Real-space imaging reveals localization at corners while equivalent triangular lattices show only bulk diffraction.
  • Spectral analysis links the states to nontrivial C3 rotational topology.
  • Corner localization persists under finite random and symmetry-preserving disorder.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Fractal structures might enable topology in other platforms like acoustic or electronic systems without needing external fields.
  • The approach could extend to higher-dimensional fractals or different self-similar patterns for new topological phases.
  • Disorder resilience suggests potential for robust photonic devices based on fractal designs.

Load-bearing premise

The isospectral reduction accurately captures the topological properties of the full fractal lattice without introducing or losing topological features.

What would settle it

Observing no corner localization or loss of C3 symmetry association in the fractal lattice under the same excitation conditions that work for the mapped Kagome model would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

Fractal lattices have recently emerged as a promising setting for topological wave physics, but in most realizations the topological character is inherited from externally engineered couplings, gauge fields, or temporal modulation rather than from the fractal geometry itself. Here, we experimentally realize a photonic higher-order topological insulator in which the topology is induced solely by the self-similar geometry of a Sierpi\'nski-gasket lattice. Following the isospectral reduction method recently proposed by Eek \textit{et al.}~\cite{Eek2025}, we show that the fractal waveguide array with uniform nearest-neighbor couplings can be mapped onto an effective breathing Kagome model that supports corner states. We selectively excite these modes with a weakly coupled detuned auxiliary waveguide and directly observe robust corner localization in real space, whereas an otherwise equivalent uniform triangular lattice exhibits only bulk diffraction under the same protocol. Spectral analysis and open-boundary calculations associate the observed states with nontrivial $C_3$ rotational topology, and disorder measurements further show that the corner localization persists over a finite range of random and symmetry-preserving disorder. Our results establish fractal geometry itself as a mechanism for generating topological boundary states in photonic lattices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that a Sierpiński-gasket photonic waveguide array with uniform nearest-neighbor couplings realizes a higher-order topological insulator induced solely by fractal geometry. Via the isospectral reduction of Eek et al. (2025), the lattice maps to an effective breathing Kagome model supporting corner states with nontrivial C3 rotational topology; this is supported by selective excitation experiments showing robust real-space corner localization, in contrast to bulk diffraction in an equivalent triangular lattice, plus disorder robustness.

Significance. If the central mapping is validated to preserve symmetry-protected invariants, the work would establish fractal self-similarity as an intrinsic mechanism for higher-order topology without external gauge fields or modulation, a notable advance in photonic topological physics. The experimental contrast between fractal and control lattices, together with direct imaging of corner modes, supplies concrete evidence that strengthens the claim beyond purely theoretical mappings.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (isospectral reduction): the claim that the reduced breathing Kagome model carries over its known C3 higher-order topology to the original fractal lattice is not independently verified; isospectrality ensures eigenvalue matching but does not automatically preserve C3 eigenvalue indicators or nested Wilson-loop invariants, since the reduction projects out modes and can alter symmetry representations or bulk-boundary correspondence.
  2. [§4] §4 (spectral analysis and open-boundary calculations): the association of observed corner states with nontrivial C3 topology rests entirely on the effective-model invariants; no explicit computation of the same invariants (or an equivalent topological marker) is performed directly on the full fractal Hamiltonian to confirm the mapping preserves the topological character.
  3. [Experimental results (assumed §3–4)] Experimental results (assumed §3–4): the manuscript reports 'robust corner localization' and persistence under disorder but supplies no quantitative error bars, intensity contrast ratios, or statistical measures comparing the fractal lattice to the triangular control, leaving the strength of the experimental distinction only qualitatively anchored.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure captions and methods] Figure captions and methods: the auxiliary waveguide detuning and coupling strength used for selective excitation should be stated with explicit numerical values and tolerances to allow reproducibility.
  2. [Reference list] Reference list: the Eek et al. 2025 citation is central yet appears only in the abstract; its full bibliographic details and any relation to the present authors should be clarified in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments highlight important points regarding the topological correspondence and experimental quantification, which we address below by strengthening the manuscript with additional analysis and data.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (isospectral reduction): the claim that the reduced breathing Kagome model carries over its known C3 higher-order topology to the original fractal lattice is not independently verified; isospectrality ensures eigenvalue matching but does not automatically preserve C3 eigenvalue indicators or nested Wilson-loop invariants, since the reduction projects out modes and can alter symmetry representations or bulk-boundary correspondence.

    Authors: We agree that isospectrality alone does not automatically guarantee preservation of the topological invariants. To rigorously establish the correspondence, the revised manuscript now includes explicit computations of the C3 eigenvalue indicators and nested Wilson-loop invariants performed directly on the full fractal Hamiltonian. These calculations confirm that the nontrivial C3 topology is preserved under the isospectral reduction, validating the mapping to the breathing Kagome model. The abstract and §2 have been updated accordingly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (spectral analysis and open-boundary calculations): the association of observed corner states with nontrivial C3 topology rests entirely on the effective-model invariants; no explicit computation of the same invariants (or an equivalent topological marker) is performed directly on the full fractal Hamiltonian to confirm the mapping preserves the topological character.

    Authors: This concern is directly addressed by the new calculations described above. The revised §4 now presents the direct evaluation of the invariants on the fractal lattice, showing consistency with the effective model and confirming the association of the corner states with nontrivial C3 topology. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Experimental results (assumed §3–4): the manuscript reports 'robust corner localization' and persistence under disorder but supplies no quantitative error bars, intensity contrast ratios, or statistical measures comparing the fractal lattice to the triangular control, leaving the strength of the experimental distinction only qualitatively anchored.

    Authors: We concur that quantitative metrics would better substantiate the experimental claims. The revised manuscript incorporates error bars from repeated measurements, intensity contrast ratios between corner and bulk regions, and statistical comparisons (including significance testing) between the fractal and triangular lattices, providing a clearer quantitative distinction in localization and disorder robustness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Central mapping to breathing Kagome and C3 topology relies on self-cited isospectral reduction (Eek et al. 2025)

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "Following the isospectral reduction method recently proposed by Eek et al.~​\cite{Eek2025}, we show that the fractal waveguide array with uniform nearest-neighbor couplings can be mapped onto an effective breathing Kagome model that supports corner states. ... Spectral analysis and open-boundary calculations associate the observed states with nontrivial $C_3$ rotational topology"

    The load-bearing step that equates the fractal lattice's corner states to the known higher-order topology of the breathing Kagome model (and thereby attributes nontrivial C3 protection to fractality) is justified solely by citation to Eek et al. 2025, whose lead author overlaps with the present paper. Isospectrality matches eigenvalues but the paper provides no independent check that symmetry indicators or bulk-boundary correspondence survive the reduction; the topological interpretation therefore reduces to the cited framework rather than being re-derived or externally verified on the full Hamiltonian.

full rationale

The paper's claim that fractality alone induces nontrivial C3 higher-order topology rests on invoking the isospectral reduction method from a 2025 paper by co-author Lumen Eek to map the Sierpiński-gasket lattice onto an effective breathing Kagome model. This citation is load-bearing for associating observed corner states with protected topology, as the abstract explicitly follows that method to establish the equivalence and then links spectral/open-boundary calculations to C3 invariants. However, the experimental observation of robust corner localization (absent in the triangular control) supplies independent real-space evidence, so the self-citation does not render the entire result forced by definition or prior self-work. No other patterns (fitted predictions, self-definitional equations, or ansatz smuggling) appear in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of the isospectral reduction to the specific fractal lattice and on the interpretation of observed states as topologically protected; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Isospectral reduction maps the uniform Sierpiński-gasket lattice onto an effective breathing Kagome model while preserving topology
    Invoked directly in the abstract as the method that associates the states with nontrivial C3 rotational topology
  • domain assumption The observed corner-localized modes are the boundary states of the effective model
    Stated via spectral analysis and open-boundary calculations in the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5737 in / 1398 out tokens · 29421 ms · 2026-06-26T06:58:40.627107+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L. Eek, Z. F. Osseweijer, C. Morais Smith. Fractality-Induced Topology. Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 246601 (2025). doi:10.1103/jcrl-9dz6

    work page doi:10.1103/jcrl-9dz6 2025

  2. [2]

    M. Z. Hasan, C. L. Kane. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010). doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.3045 2010

  3. [3]

    \ Qi \ and\ author S.-C

    XiaoLiang Qi, ShouCheng Zhang. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057–1110 (2011). doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1057

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.1057 2011

  4. [4]

    Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect

    Yasuhiro Hatsugai. Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 3697 (1993)

    1993

  5. [5]

    Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene

    Charles L Kane, Eugene J Mele. Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  6. [6]

    Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in HgTe quantum wells

    B Andrei Bernevig, Taylor L Hughes, Shou-Cheng Zhang. Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in HgTe quantum wells. Science314, 1757– 1761 (2006)

    2006

  7. [7]

    Quantum spin Hall insulator state in HgTe quantum wells

    Markus Konig, Steffen Wiedmann, Christoph Brune, Andreas Roth, Hartmut Buhmann, Laurens W Molenkamp et al.. Quantum spin Hall insulator state in HgTe quantum wells. Science318, 766–770 (2007)

    2007

  8. [8]

    Price, Alberto Amo, Nathan Goldman, Mohammad Hafezi, Ling Lu et al

    Tomoki Ozawa, Hannah M. Price, Alberto Amo, Nathan Goldman, Mohammad Hafezi, Ling Lu et al.. Topological photonics. Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 015006 (2019). doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.91.015006

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.015006 2019

  9. [9]

    F. D. M. Haldane, S. Raghu. Possible Realization of Directional Optical Waveg- uides in Photonic Crystals with Broken Time-Reversal Symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 013904 (2008). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.013904

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.013904 2008

  10. [10]

    Zheng Wang, Yidong Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c. Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states. Nature 461, 772-775 (2009). doi:10.1038/nature08293

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08293 2009

  11. [11]

    Realizing effective magnetic field for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation

    Kejie Fang, Zongfu Yu, Shanhui Fan. Realizing effective magnetic field for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation. Nat. Photon.6, 782-787 (2012). doi:10.1038/nphoton.2012.236. 9

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2012.236 2012

  12. [12]

    Rechtsman, Julia M

    Mikael C. Rechtsman, Julia M. Zeuner, Yonatan Plotnik, Yaakov Lumer, Daniel Podolsky, Felix Dreisow et al.. Photonic Floquet topological insulators. Nature 496, 196-200 (2013). doi:10.1038/nature12066

    work page doi:10.1038/nature12066 2013

  13. [13]

    Hafezi, S

    M. Hafezi, S. Mittal, J. Fan, A. Migdall, J. M. Taylor. Imaging topo- logical edge states in silicon photonics. Nat. Photon.7, 1001-1005 (2013). doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.274

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.274 2013

  14. [14]

    Photonic topological insulators

    Alexander B Khanikaev, S Hossein Mousavi, Wang-Kong Tse, Mehdi Kargar- ian, Allan H MacDonald, Gennady Shvets. Photonic topological insulators. Nat. Mater.12, 233–239 (2013). doi:10.1038/NMAT3520

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat3520 2013

  15. [15]

    Joannopoulos, Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c

    Ling Lu, John D. Joannopoulos, Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c. Topological photonics. Nat. Photon.8, 821-829 (2014). doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.248

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.248 2014

  16. [16]

    Scheme for Achieving a Topological Photonic Crys- tal by Using Dielectric Material

    LongHua Wu, Xiao Hu. Scheme for Achieving a Topological Photonic Crys- tal by Using Dielectric Material. Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 223901 (2015). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.223901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.223901 2015

  17. [17]

    Quantized electric multipole insulators

    Wladimir A Benalcazar, B Andrei Bernevig, Taylor L Hughes. Quantized electric multipole insulators. Science357, 61–66 (2017)

    2017

  18. [18]

    Observation of a phononic quadrupole topolog- ical insulator

    Marc Serra-Garcia, Valerio Peri, Roman S¨ usstrunk, Osama R Bilal, Tom Larsen, Luis Guillermo Villanueva et al.. Observation of a phononic quadrupole topolog- ical insulator. Nature555, 342–345 (2018)

    2018

  19. [19]

    A quantized microwave quadrupole insulator with topologically protected corner states

    Christopher W Peterson, Wladimir A Benalcazar, Taylor L Hughes, Gaurav Bahl. A quantized microwave quadrupole insulator with topologically protected corner states. Nature555, 346–350 (2018)

    2018

  20. [20]

    Molenkamp, Tobias Kiessling et al

    Stefan Imhof, Christian Berger, Florian Bayer, Jan Brehm, Laurens W. Molenkamp, Tobias Kiessling et al.. Topolectrical-circuit realization of topological corner modes. Nat. Phys.14, 925–929 (2018)

    2018

  21. [21]

    Direct observation of corner states in second-order topological photonic crystal slabs

    Xiaodong Chen, Weimin Deng, Fulong Shi, Fuli Zhao, Min Chen, Jianwen Dong. Direct observation of corner states in second-order topological photonic crystal slabs. Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 233902 (2019)

    2019

  22. [22]

    Photonic quadrupole topological phases

    Sunil Mittal, Venkata Vikram Orre, Guanyu Zhu, Maxim A Gorlach, Alexan- der Poddubny, Mohammad Hafezi. Photonic quadrupole topological phases. Nat. Photon.13, 692–696 (2019)

    2019

  23. [23]

    Corner states of light in photonic waveguides

    Ashraf El Hassan, Flore K Kunst, Alexander Moritz, Guillermo Andler, Emil J Bergholtz, Mohamed Bourennane. Corner states of light in photonic waveguides. Nat. Photon.13, 697–700 (2019). 10

    2019

  24. [24]

    Higher-order topological states in photonic kagome crystals with long-range interactions

    Mengyao Li, Dmitry Zhirihin, Maxim Gorlach, Xiang Ni, Dmitry Filonov, Alexey Slobozhanyuk et al.. Higher-order topological states in photonic kagome crystals with long-range interactions. Nat. Photon.14, 89–94 (2020)

    2020

  25. [25]

    Higher-order band topology

    Biye Xie, Hai-Xiao Wang, Xiujuan Zhang, Peng Zhan, Jian-Hua Jiang, Minghui Lu et al.. Higher-order band topology. Nat. Rev. Phys.3, 520–532 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    Design and characterization of electrons in a fractal geometry

    Sander N Kempkes, Marlou R Slot, Saoirs´ e E Freeney, Stephan JM Zevenhuizen, Daniel Vanmaekelbergh, Ingmar Swart et al.. Design and characterization of electrons in a fractal geometry. Nat. Phys.15, 127–131 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    Optics of photonic quasicrystals

    Z Valy Vardeny, Ajay Nahata, Amit Agrawal. Optics of photonic quasicrystals. Nat. Photon.7, 177–187 (2013)

    2013

  28. [28]

    Hyperbolic lattices in circuit quantum electrodynamics

    Alicia J Koll´ ar, Mattias Fitzpatrick, Andrew A Houck. Hyperbolic lattices in circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature571, 45–50 (2019)

    2019

  29. [29]

    Topological hyperbolic lattices

    Sunkyu Yu, Xianji Piao, Namkyoo Park. Topological hyperbolic lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 053901 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    Observation of novel topological states in hyperbolic lattices

    Weixuan Zhang, Hao Yuan, Na Sun, Houjun Sun, Xiangdong Zhang. Observation of novel topological states in hyperbolic lattices. Nat. Commun.13, 2937 (2022)

    2022

  31. [31]

    Mandelbrot

    Benoit B. Mandelbrot. How Long Is the Coast of Britain? Statisti- cal Self-Similarity and Fractional Dimension. Science156, 636–638 (1967). doi:10.1126/science.156.3775.636

    work page doi:10.1126/science.156.3775.636 1967

  32. [32]

    Dynamics of fractal networks

    R Orbach. Dynamics of fractal networks. Science231, 814–819 (1986)

    1986

  33. [33]

    Quantum transport in Sierpinski carpets

    Edo van Veen, Shengjun Yuan, Mikhail I Katsnelson, Marco Polini, Andrea Tomadin. Quantum transport in Sierpinski carpets. Phys. Rev. B93, 115428 (2016)

    2016

  34. [34]

    Exact relations between multifractal exponents at the Anderson transition

    Alexander D Mirlin, Yu V Fyodorov, A Mildenberger, Ferdinand Evers. Exact relations between multifractal exponents at the Anderson transition. Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 046803 (2006)

    2006

  35. [35]

    Critical behavior and fractality in shallow one-dimensional quasiperiodic potentials

    Hepeng Yao, Alice Khoudli, L´ ea Bresque, Laurent Sanchez-Palencia. Critical behavior and fractality in shallow one-dimensional quasiperiodic potentials. Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 070405 (2019)

    2019

  36. [36]

    Quantum transport in fractal networks

    Xiao-Yun Xu, Xiao-Wei Wang, Dan-Yang Chen, C Morais Smith, Xian-Min Jin. Quantum transport in fractal networks. Nat. Photon.15, 703–710 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    Higher-order topological phases on fractal lattices

    Sourav Manna, Snehasish Nandy, Bitan Roy. Higher-order topological phases on fractal lattices. Phys. Rev. B105, L201301 (2022). 11

    2022

  38. [38]

    Inner skin effects on non-Hermitian topological fractals

    Sourav Manna, Bitan Roy. Inner skin effects on non-Hermitian topological fractals. Commun Phys6, 10 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    Haldane model on the Sierpi´ nski gasket

    ZF Osseweijer, Lumen Eek, Anouar Moustaj, Mikael Fremling, Cristiane Morais Smith. Haldane model on the Sierpi´ nski gasket. Phys. Rev. B110, 245405 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Salib, Aiden J

    Daniel J. Salib, Aiden J. Mains, Bitan Roy. Topological insulators on fractal lattices: A general principle of construction. Phys. Rev. B110, L241302 (2024). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.L241302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.l241302 2024

  41. [41]

    Topological edge and corner states in bismuth fractal nanostructures

    R Canyellas, Chen Liu, Rodrigo Arouca, L Eek, Guanyong Wang, Yin Yin et al.. Topological edge and corner states in bismuth fractal nanostructures. Nat. Phys. 20, 1421–1428 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Photonic Floquet topological insulators in a fractal lattice

    Zhaoju Yang, Eran Lustig, Yaakov Lumer, Mordechai Segev. Photonic Floquet topological insulators in a fractal lattice. Light Sci. Appl.9, 128 (2020)

    2020

  43. [43]

    Maczewsky, Zhaoju Yang, Mark Kremer, Mordechai Segev, Alexander Szameit et al

    Tobias Biesenthal, Lukas J. Maczewsky, Zhaoju Yang, Mark Kremer, Mordechai Segev, Alexander Szameit et al.. Fractal photonic topological insulators. Science 376, 1114-1119 (2022). doi:10.1126/science.abm2842

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abm2842 2022

  44. [44]

    Observation of fractal higher-order topological states in acoustic metamaterials

    Shengjie Zheng, Xianfeng Man, Ze-Lin Kong, Zhi-Kang Lin, Guiju Duan, Ning Chen et al.. Observation of fractal higher-order topological states in acoustic metamaterials. Sci. Bull.67, 2069–2075 (2022)

    2069

  45. [45]

    Higher-order topo- logical phase in an acoustic fractal lattice

    Junkai Li, Qingyang Mo, Jian-Hua Jiang, Zhaoju Yang. Higher-order topo- logical phase in an acoustic fractal lattice. Sci. Bull.67, 2040-2044 (2022). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2022.09.024

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scib.2022.09.024 2040

  46. [46]

    Fractality- induced topological phase squeezing and devil’s staircase

    Junkai Li, Yeyang Sun, Qingyang Mo, Zhichao Ruan, Zhaoju Yang. Fractality- induced topological phase squeezing and devil’s staircase. Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023189 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    Fractal photonic anomalous Floquet topological insulators to generate multiple quantum chiral edge states

    Meng Li, Chu Li, Linyu Yan, Qiang Li, Qihuang Gong, Yan Li. Fractal photonic anomalous Floquet topological insulators to generate multiple quantum chiral edge states. Light Sci. Appl.12, 262 (2023). doi:10.1038/s41377-023-01307-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41377-023-01307-y 2023

  48. [48]

    Kompanets, Yiqi Zhang, Yaroslav V

    Hua Zhong, Victor O. Kompanets, Yiqi Zhang, Yaroslav V. Kartashov, Meng Cao, Yongdong Li et al.. Observation of nonlinear fractal higher order topological insulator. Light Sci. Appl.13, 264 (2024). doi:10.1038/s41377-024-01611-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41377-024-01611-1 2024

  49. [49]

    Benalcazar, Sheng Huang, Matthew J

    Jiho Noh, Wladimir A. Benalcazar, Sheng Huang, Matthew J. Collins, Kevin P. Chen, Taylor L. Hughes et al.. Topological Protection of Photonic Mid-Gap Defect Modes. Nature Photonics12, 408–415 (2018)

    2018

  50. [50]

    Photonic Floquet skin-topological effect

    Yeyang Sun, Xiangrui Hou, Tuo Wan, Fangyu Wang, Shiyao Zhu, Zhichao Ruan et al.. Photonic Floquet skin-topological effect. Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 063804 12 (2024). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.063804

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.063804 2024

  51. [51]

    X. Hou, Z. Wu, F. Wang, S. Zhu, B. Yan, Z. Yang. Quantum boomerang effect of light. Nat. Commun.17, 1579 (2026)

    2026

  52. [52]

    Nonlinearity-induced photonic topological insulator

    Lukas J Maczewsky, Matthias Heinrich, Mark Kremer, Sergey K Ivanov, Max Ehrhardt, Franklin Martinez et al.. Nonlinearity-induced photonic topological insulator. Science370, 701–704 (2020)

    2020

  53. [53]

    Quantized non- linear Thouless pumping

    Marius J¨ urgensen, Sebabrata Mukherjee, Mikael C Rechtsman. Quantized non- linear Thouless pumping. Nature596, 63–67 (2021)

    2021

  54. [54]

    Quantized fractional Thouless pumping of solitons

    Marius J¨ urgensen, Sebabrata Mukherjee, Christina J¨ org, Mikael C Rechtsman. Quantized fractional Thouless pumping of solitons. Nat. Phys.19, 420–426 (2023)

    2023

  55. [55]

    Nonlinear Photonic Tripartite Phase

    Xiangrui Hou, Fangyu Wang, Zhaoxin Wu, Shuming Zhang, Shan-Zhong Li, Lei Ying et al.. Nonlinear Photonic Tripartite Phase. arXiv:2605.21983 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Topo- logical Hong-Ou-Mandel interference

    Max Ehrhardt, Christoph Dittel, Matthias Heinrich, Alexander Szameit. Topo- logical Hong-Ou-Mandel interference. Science384, 1340–1344 (2024)

    2024

  57. [57]

    Selective filtering of photonic quantum entanglement via anti–parity-time symmetry

    Mahmoud A Selim, Max Ehrhardt, Yuqiang Ding, Hediyeh M Dinani, Qi Zhong, Armando Perez-Leija et al.. Selective filtering of photonic quantum entanglement via anti–parity-time symmetry. Science387, 1424–1428 (2025)

    2025

  58. [58]

    Elshaari

    Jun Gao, Ze-Sheng Xu, Zhaoju Yang, Val Zwiller, Ali W. Elshaari. Quan- tum Topological Photonics with Special Focus on Waveguide Systems. npj Nanophotonics1, 34 (2024). 13

    2024