Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Tolerant Independent Set Tester

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.21441 v1 pith:3YIW2NEO submitted 2025-03-27 cs.DS

classification cs.DS
keywords epsilongraphsindependentboundsubgraphtestingcomplexitycontainer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We give nearly optimal bounds on the sample complexity of $(\widetilde{\Omega}(\epsilon),\epsilon)$-tolerant testing the $\rho$-independent set property in the dense graph setting. In particular, we give an algorithm that inspects a random subgraph on $\widetilde{O}(\rho^3/\epsilon^2)$ vertices and, for some constant $c,$ distinguishes between graphs that have an induced subgraph of size $\rho n$ with fewer than $\frac{\epsilon}{c \log^4(1/\epsilon)} n^2$ edges from graphs for which every induced subgraph of size $\rho n$ has at least $\epsilon n^2$ edges. Our sample complexity bound matches, up to logarithmic factors, the recent upper bound by Blais and Seth (2023) for the non-tolerant testing problem, which is known to be optimal for the non-tolerant testing problem based on a lower bound by Feige, Langberg and Schechtman (2004). Our main technique is a new graph container lemma for sparse subgraphs instead of independent sets. We also show that our new lemma can be used to generalize one of the classic applications of the container method, that of counting independent sets in regular graphs, to counting sparse subgraphs in regular graphs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TCS-BENCH: Benchmarking State-of-the-Art Generative AI Theoretical Computer Science Research Ability

    cs.CL 2026-08 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper introduces TCS-Bench, a 300-task proof-generation benchmark from top TCS papers, and reports frontier LLM accuracies from 30% to 68% using an automated verifier.

Pith tools