Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Overionized plasma in the supernova remnant Sagittarius A East anchored by XRISM observations

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Sgr A East, the supernova remnant beside the Milky Way's supermassive black hole, is pinned down: its X-ray emission is overionized, with a forbidden-to-resonance Fe XXV ratio of 1.39 ± 0.12 and an initial ionization temperature above 4…

desk verdict First XRISM look at Sgr A East resolves the Fe XXV triplet and makes a solid case for overionized plasma, though the headline kTinit and tau numbers are softer than the quoted systematics imply. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00676 v2 pith:436RU4RZ submitted 2024-12-01 astro-ph.HE

XRISM Collaboration This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords overionizedplasmasupernovaremnantSagittariusAEastGalacticcenterXRISMFeXXVK-shelllinesrecombinationtimescaleX-rayspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using the first high-resolution X-ray spectrum of the supernova remnant Sagittarius A East, the paper resolves the Fe XXV K-shell triplet into its forbidden, intercombination, and resonance lines and measures the forbidden-to-resonance ratio at 1.39 ± 0.12, with a Lyα/Heα-w ratio of 0.36 ± 0.07. The paper argues that these ratios cannot be produced by a plasma in collisional ionization equilibrium or by an ionizing plasma, but are naturally reproduced by an overionized (recombining) plasma model. The implied initial ionization temperature just before the transition to recombining is > 4 keV, and the recombination timescale is < 8 × $10^{11}$ $cm^{-3}$ s. Because the remnant sits next to the supermassive black hole Sgr A*, the result sharpens the question of whether the overionization came from rapid adiabatic cooling of dense circumstellar material or from a past luminous outburst of Sgr A*.

What carries the argument

The central diagnostic is the Fe XXV Heα triplet, the forbidden (z), intercombination (x/y), and resonance (w) lines, whose relative intensities depend on how the plasma was ionized and how it is recombining. In a recombining plasma the forbidden line is enhanced relative to the resonance line; comparing the observed z/w and Lyα/Heα-w ratios against AtomDB collisional-radiative models, via the bvvrnei overionized model with Lorentzians for the six bright lines, directly maps out the allowed electron temperature, present ionization temperature, initial ionization temperature, and recombination timescale.

What would settle it

The overionized model predicts an He-like Fe radiative recombination continuum at ~8.83 keV; a deeper XRISM observation with better control of the power-law and transient contamination that found no such edge at the predicted strength, or an independent density-age estimate forcing τ > 8 × $10^{11}$ $cm^{-3}$ s, would refute the single-component overionized interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the discovery is that the Fe K-shell emitting plasma in Sgr A East is overionized: the observed line ratios select a narrow corner of parameter space in which the electron temperature is 1.6 ± 0.2 keV while the ionization state corresponds to a present ionization temperature of 4.7 ± 0.4 keV, requiring kT_init > 4 keV and τ < 8 × $10^{11}$ $cm^{-3}$ s. The paper also reports a velocity dispersion of 109 ± 6 km $s^{-1}$, implying an Fe ion temperature < 8 keV and an expansion velocity < 200 km $s^{-1}$, and rules out resonance scattering (< 5% effect) and charge exchange (< 10%) as alternative explanations for the enhanced forbidden line.

Load-bearing premise

The line-ratio diagnostic assumes that all Fe K emission from the region can be attributed to a single overionized plasma component, with the foreground transient AX J1745.6-2901 and the Galactic center X-ray background correctly subtracted; if the emission is actually a spatial mixture of separate ionizing and recombining regions, or if the transient's variable Fe absorption distorts the forbidden and resonance lines differently, the inferred kT_init and τ would not be unique.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sgr A East becomes a firmly established member of the small class of overionized supernova remnants, ending the dispute between earlier claims of overionization and counter-claims of an ionizing plasma.
  • The measured kT_init > 4 keV and τ < 8 × 10^11 cm^-3 s narrow the plausible triggers to rapid cooling from a dense circumstellar medium or past photoionization by Sgr A*, and disfavor thermal conduction.
  • The small velocity dispersion (< 200 km s^-1) and Fe ion temperature (< 8 keV) require a dense environment that suppresses expansion, consistent with a high-density CSM or strong reverse shock.
  • The recombination timescale combined with the plasma density implies that the overionization started ≲ 2500 yr (n_e / 10 cm^-3)^-1 ago, linking the plasma state to a recent event at the Galactic center.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the photoionization scenario holds, Sgr A East acts as a fossil X-ray echo of a Sgr A* outburst within the past few thousand years; a separate test would look for overionization signatures in other elements (Si, S, Ar) in the swept-up interstellar medium, which the paper notes should also be overionized in that case.
  • The absolute charge-exchange contribution is only bounded (< 10% at Heα-w); a direct measurement of CX lines in a longer exposure could tighten the overionized parameter constraints further.
  • XRISM's resolving power makes the z/w plus Lyα/Heα-w pair a reusable diagnostic: the same two-ratio analysis could be applied to other mixed-morphology remnants to test whether Sgr A East's overionized state is typical or exceptional.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents the first XRISM/Resolve observation of the supernova remnant Sgr A East. After modeling the Fe K band with six Lorentzian lines plus a two-temperature bvvrnei plasma, a power-law, the Galactic center X-ray emission, and the transient AX J1745.6-2901, the authors measure Fe Heα-z/Heα-w = 1.39 ± 0.12 and Lyα/Heα-w = 0.36 ± 0.07. Comparing these ratios with AtomDB grids, they find that CIE models cannot reproduce the large forbidden-to-resonance ratio, while an overionized NEI model with kTe = 1.6 ± 0.2 keV, present ionization temperature kTz = 4.7 ± 0.4 keV, initial ionization temperature kTinit > 4 keV, and recombination timescale tau < 8e11 cm^-3 s can. The high initial temperature and short recombination timescale are interpreted as evidence for rapid adiabatic cooling from dense CSM or for past photoionization by Sgr A*. Checks on resonance scattering, charge exchange, GCXE spatial variation, and AX J1745.6-2901 absorption are included.

Significance. If correct, this is an important result: it provides the first fine-structure-resolved Fe XXV diagnostics of Sgr A East, appears to settle the conflict between Ono et al. (2019) and Zhou et al. (2021), and yields quantitative constraints that bear on the past activity of Sgr A*. The paper's strengths are the clean spectral separation, the simultaneous source/background fit with C-stat/d.o.f. = 2975.1/2589, and the explicit treatment of resonance scattering, charge exchange, GCXE normalization, and AX J1745.6-2901 absorption. The overionized character of at least part of the Fe-K emitting plasma is well supported; the main uncertainty is whether the quantitative single-zone values are unique.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.2 / Fig. 3] The derivation of kTinit > 4 keV and tau < 8e11 cm^-3 s assumes that the Fe Heα and Lyα fluxes originate in a single overionized NEI zone. The two-temperature model in Section 3.1 does not test this assumption because its low-temperature component is fixed to Ono et al. (2019) and contributes less than 5% at the Fe lines; it cannot represent an independent hotter CIE admixture. A two-component model with a recombining component plus a kTe ~ 3-5 keV CIE component can in principle reproduce both measured ratios: the CIE component adds resonance and Lyα flux without adding forbidden-line flux, which would change the kTinit and tau values required to match z/w = 1.39 and Lyα/w = 0.36. The systematic checks in Section 3.1 (GCXE +40% scaling and AX J1745.6-2901 absorption) rescale components within the same single-zone framework and therefore do not bound this model ambiguity. I request an explicit fit or upper limit for such an admixture, or a revision of the abstract and Section 4 so that kTinit > 4 keV and tau < 8e11 cm^-3 s are presented as single-zone NEI values rather than as robust constraints.
  2. [Abstract and Section 3.2] The phrase "reliable constraint on the ionization temperature just before the transition into the overionization state" is stronger than the model comparison supports. The constraint kTinit > 4 keV is read off a one-zone AtomDB grid in Fig. 3(d) and is only as secure as the one-zone assumption. Because the abstract and the Discussion use this number to argue against thermal conduction and in favor of adiabatic expansion or photoionization, the model-dependence should be stated wherever the number is used.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 1] In the last paragraph, "hearafter" should be "hereafter".
  2. [Table 1] The power-law flux row is labeled "Absorbed photon flux in 6.5-7.1 keV (erg s^-1 cm^-2)"; please clarify whether this is a photon flux or an energy flux and make the units consistent.
  3. [Figure 3(d)] The background color scale shows the Heα-z/Heα-w ratio while the red region marks the intersection of the two observed ratio constraints; drawing explicit 1σ contour lines would make the allowed region easier to read.
  4. [Section 3.1] The statement that kTinit is fixed to 10 keV because the model is insensitive to it could be cross-referenced to Section 3.2, where kTinit is treated as a diagnostic parameter, to avoid an apparent contradiction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the overionized-plasma claim is anchored to measured Fe line ratios compared against AtomDB grids, not to assumed plasma parameters.

full rationale

The central diagnostic is self-contained: the Fe Heα and Lyα line fluxes are measured with semi-phenomenological Lorentzian models, and the forbidden-to-resonance ratio z/w = 1.39 ± 0.12 is then compared directly with AtomDB CIE and overionized NEI grids (Section 3.2, Figure 3). The inferred constraints kTinit > 4 keV and τ < 8×10^11 cm^-3 s are read off those grids, not imposed by the fit. The spectral model does include a two-temperature overionized bvvrnei component with parameters fixed from Ono et al. (2019), and Ono et al. shares authors with the present paper (Uchiyama, Nobukawa, et al.). However, the paper explicitly states that the low-temperature component contributes below 5% at Fe Heα and Lyα, that kTinit is insensitive without the six major lines, and that the absorption column is unimportant at 6.5–7 keV; these fixed inputs are therefore not load-bearing for the headline result. Self-citations to Suzuki et al. (2020) for the Lorentzian-replacement methodology and to XRISM Collaboration (2024) for instrument calibration are methodological, not evidential load-bearing. The single-zone NEI interpretation is a model-choice concern rather than a circularity: a two-component recombining-plus-hot-CIE mixture could in principle shift the quantitative constraints, but the paper’s own model comparison does not define the conclusion in terms of its inputs. Overall, no equation or fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the central overionization evidence stands independently of the cited prior work.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central diagnostic is model-based but not circular: six line fluxes are measured and compared with independent AtomDB model grids. The analysis introduces several fitted parameters (kTe, tau, broadening, normalizations) and carries fixed inputs from Ono et al. (2019) that could in principle affect the inferred plasma state. No new particles, forces, or physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (9)
  • kTinit (initial ionization temperature) = 10 keV (fixed, from Ono et al. 2019)
    Fixed in the Table 1 spectral fit and in the CX evaluation; in the diagnostics it is scanned to derive kTinit > 4 keV, so the reported constraint is an inferred bound rather than a fitted value.
  • kTe (electron temperature of high-temperature component) = 1.69 ± 0.09 keV
    Free parameter of the high-temperature bvvrnei component in Table 1; it shapes the line ratios used for the overionization diagnosis.
  • tau (recombination timescale) = (7.7 ± 1.1) × 10^11 s cm^-3
    Free parameter in the Table 1 fit; the same quantity is constrained from line ratios in Section 3.2, so it is a fitted diagnostic, not an independent prediction.
  • Velocity dispersion (line broadening) = 109 ± 6 km/s
    Free broadening parameter shared by the Lorentzian lines and the bvvrnei model; converted to Fe ion temperature and expansion velocity bounds.
  • Emission measure nenHV = (5.0 ± 0.5) × 10^58 cm^-5
    Normalization of the high-temperature component; used for density and age estimates in Section 4.1.
  • Power-law flux = (1.8 ± 0.7) × 10^-13 erg/s/cm^2 (6.5-7.1 keV, absorbed)
    Free continuum component in the source model; absorbs possible non-thermal or point-source contamination.
  • GCXE surface brightness = (3.0 ± 0.1) × 10^-14 erg/s/cm^2/arcmin^2 (6.5-7.1 keV)
    Normalization of the background model; spatial dependence checked by a +40% scaling.
  • Fe abundance = 1.5 solar (fixed)
    Fixed to Ono et al. (2019); affects line emissivities and the resonance-scattering optical depth estimate.
  • NH (absorption column) = 1.5 × 10^23 cm^-2 (fixed)
    Fixed to Ono et al. (2019) and roughly consistent with Zhou et al. (2021); unimportant in the 6.5-7.1 keV band used for the central diagnostic.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Distance to Sgr A East is 8 kpc.
    Used to convert angular size to physical radius and to derive densities and age estimates in Sections 1 and 4.1; not needed for the line-ratio diagnostic itself.
  • domain assumption AtomDB v3.0.9, ACX2, and SPEX CX models provide accurate Fe line emissivities and recombination rates.
    All plasma-state conclusions are read off these model grids in Section 3.2 and Appendix 1.
  • domain assumption The Fe K-shell emission is from a single-zone overionized plasma modeled by bvvrnei plus a low-temperature component fixed from Ono et al. (2019).
    Section 3.1 describes this parameterization; if the real plasma is multi-zone, the inferred kTinit and tau bounds could change.
  • domain assumption The GCXE surface brightness is the same for source and background regions, and the AX J1745.6-2901 model is correct after allowing its normalization to vary within ±50%.
    Section 3.1 relies on this for background subtraction; the paper checks +40% GCXE scaling and absorption-line replacement, but larger spatial variations could alter line fluxes.
  • domain assumption Plasma electrons have a Maxwellian distribution and the plasma follows the non-equilibrium collisional ionization description in bvvrnei.
    Section 3.1 and 3.2 assume this; no non-Maxwellian or multi-temperature electron distribution is considered.
  • domain assumption Charge exchange emission is evaluated assuming a collision velocity of 1000 km/s and repeated electron capture until neutralization.
    Appendix 1 uses these assumptions to bound the CX contribution below 10%; different CX parameters could shift the allowed parameter space.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Overionized plasma in the supernova remnant Sagittarius A East anchored by XRISM observations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/436RU4RZ

@misc{pith2026241200676,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Overionized plasma in the supernova remnant Sagittarius A East anchored by XRISM observations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/436RU4RZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00676}
}
abstract

Sagittarius A East is a supernova remnant with a unique surrounding environment, as it is located in the immediate vicinity of the supermassive black hole at the Galactic center, Sagittarius A*. The X-ray emission of the remnant is suspected to show features of overionized plasma, which would require peculiar evolutionary paths. We report on the first observation of Sagittarius A East with X-Ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission (XRISM). Equipped with a combination of high-resolution microcalorimeter spectrometer and large field-of-view CCD imager, we for the first time resolved the Fe XXV K-shell lines into fine structure lines and measured the forbidden-to-resonance intensity ratio to be $1.39\pm0.12$, which strongly suggests the presence of overionized plasma. We obtained a reliable constraint on the ionization temperature just before the transition into the overionization state, to be > 4 keV. The recombination timescale was constrained to be < $8\times10^{11}$ cm$^{-3}$ s. The small velocity dispersion of $109\pm6$ km s$^{-1}$ indicates a low Fe ion temperature < 8 keV and a small expansion velocity < 200 km s$^{-1}$. The high initial ionization temperature and small recombination timescale suggest that either rapid cooling of the plasma via adiabatic expansion from dense circumstellar material or intense photoionization by Sagittarius A* in the past may have triggered the overionization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.00676 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) 6.5–6.8 keV Xtend image of the Galactic center region with the Resolve field of views (FoVs; yellow boxes), source (green) and background (white) regions. Background subtraction and vignetting (off-axis exposure) correction is not applied. The VLA 4.8 GHz contours obtained from the NRAO archive (https://www.vla.nrao.edu/astro/archive/pipeline/position/J174535.6-285839/) are overlaid in magenta. (b) 6.5–6.8 keV R… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. X-ray spectrum of the Sgr A East region with XRISM Resolve with the best-fit spectral models. The blue solid line represents the Sgr A East model. The blue dashed lines indicate the Lorentzian models which replace the Fe-Heα and Lyα lines in the bvvrnei model (see text for methodology). The solid and dashed gray lines represent the spectral models of AX J1745.6 − 2901 without and with absorption by ionized Fe atoms,… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of the observed Fe Heα-z/Heα-w and Lyα/Heα-w intensity ratios and AtomDB plasma models. The observed intensity ratios and their 1σ uncertainty ranges are indicated with red transparent regions in the panels (a) and (b). (a) Comparison with the CIE model with various electron temperatures (kTe). The upper and lower panels show the Heα-z/Heα-w intensity ratio and ion fractions, respectively. (b) Comparison … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Constraints on the parameters of the (a) ionizing and (b) overionized plasma models with the contribution of charge exchange (CX) emission (ACX2 v2.0 in XSPEC) considered. The initial ionization temperature of 10 keV is assumed for the overionized plasma model. The red…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Revisiting the Suzaku spectrum of the Galactic SNR W 49 B: non-detection of iron K-shell charge exchange emission and refined ejecta mass ratios of iron-group elements

    astro-ph.HE 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A reanalysis of Suzaku data on W49B shows the reported Fe XXV charge exchange signal is explained by missing high-shell dielectronic recombination satellite lines, leaving no robust CX detection.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    \@bibitem \@bib@author\@prev@author \@set@biblabel \@lbibitem[#1] \@bib@parse#1()\@nil \@set@biblabel \@bib@parse#1(#2)#3\@nil \@bib@author #1 @edef\@bib@year @space#2 \@empty \@set@biblabel#1 \@bib@author\@empty \@latex@warning Author name should be given for reference entry ``#1'' \@bib@year\@empty \@latex@warning Publication year should be given for re...

  2. [2]

    Ser., 17

    Arnaud , K.A., 1996, volume 101 of ASP Conf. Ser., 17

    work page 1996

  3. [3]

    Cash , W., 1979, , 228, 939

    work page 1979

  4. [4]

    Chandra, P., Chevalier, R.A., Maeda, K., Ray, A.K., & J., N.A., 2024, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 963, 1, L4

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Chatzopoulos , S., Fritz , T.K., Gerhard , O., Gillessen , S., Wegg , C., Genzel , R., & Pfuhl , O., 2015, , 447, 1, 948

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    SPIE, volume 13093, 130931P

    Eckart, M.E., Brown, G.V., Chiao, M.P., et al., 2024, in Proc. SPIE, volume 13093, 130931P

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Ekers , R.D., Goss , W.M., Schwarz , U.J., Downes , D., & Rogstad , D.H., 1975, , 43, 159

    work page 1975

  8. [8]

    & Heuer, K., 2020, Atoms, 8, 3

    Foster, A.R. & Heuer, K., 2020, Atoms, 8, 3

    work page 2020

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Foster , A.R., Ji , L., Smith , R.K., & Brickhouse , N.S., 2012, , 756, 2, 128

    2012

  2. [10]

    Frail , D.A., 2011, , 82, 703

    2011

  3. [11]

    Fryer , C.L., Rockefeller , G., Hungerford , A., & Melia , F., 2006, , 638, 2, 786

    2006

  4. [12]

    Gillessen , S., Eisenhauer , F., Trippe , S., Alexander , T., Genzel , R., Martins , F., & Ott , T., 2009, , 692, 2, 1075

    2009

  5. [13]

    Gu , L., Kaastra , J., & Raassen , A.J.J., 2016, , 588, A52

    2016

  6. [14]

    HEASARC , 2014, HEAsoft: Unified Release of FTOOLS and XANADU

    2014

  7. [15]

    Hyodo , Y., Ueda , Y., Yuasa , T., Maeda , Y., Makishima , K., & Koyama , K., 2009, , 61, S99

    2009

  8. [16]

    Ishisaki , Y., Ezoe , Y., Yamada , S., et al., 2018, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 193, 5-6, 991

    2018

  9. [17]

    & Masai , K., 1989, , 236, 885

    Itoh , H. & Masai , K., 1989, , 236, 885

    1989

  10. [18]

    & Mewe , R., 1995, , 302, L13

    Kaastra , J.S. & Mewe , R., 1995, , 302, L13

    1995

  11. [19]

    Kaastra , J.S., Mewe , R., & Nieuwenhuijzen , H., 1996, in UV and X-ray Spectroscopy of Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas, eds. K. Yamashita & T. Watanabe , 411--414

    1996

  12. [20]

    & Kastner , R.E., 1990, , 44, 275

    Kastner , S.O. & Kastner , R.E., 1990, , 44, 275

    1990

  13. [21]

    Kawasaki , M.T., Ozaki , M., Nagase , F., Masai , K., Ishida , M., & Petre , R., 2002, , 572, 2, 897

    2002

  14. [22]

    Koyama , K., 2018, , 70, 1, R1

    2018

  15. [23]

    Koyama , K., Uchiyama , H., Hyodo , Y., Matsumoto , H., Tsuru , T.G., Ozaki , M., Maeda , Y., & Murakami , H., 2007, , 59, 237

    2007

  16. [24]

    SPIE, volume 11444, 114445D

    Loewenstein , M., Hill , R.S., Holland , M.P., et al., 2020, in Proc. SPIE, volume 11444, 114445D

    2020

  17. [25]

    Lugten , J.B., Genzel , R., Crawford , M.K., & Townes , C.H., 1986, , 306, 691

    1986

  18. [26]

    Maeda , Y., Baganoff , F.K., Feigelson , E.D., et al., 2002, , 570, 2, 671

    2002

  19. [27]

    Masai , K., 1994, , 437, 770

    1994

  20. [28]

    SPIE, volume 12181, 121811T

    Mori , K., Tomida , H., Nakajima , H., et al., 2022, in Proc. SPIE, volume 12181, 121811T

    2022

  21. [29]

    Muno , M.P., Baganoff , F.K., Bautz , M.W., et al., 2004, , 613, 1, 326

    2004

  22. [30]

    Nakashima , S., Nobukawa , M., Uchida , H., Tanaka , T., Tsuru , T.G., Koyama , K., Murakami , H., & Uchiyama , H., 2013, , 773, 1, 20

    2013

  23. [31]

    Ohshiro, Y., Suzuki, S., Okada, Y., Suzuki, H., & Yamaguchi, H., 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 976, 2, 180

    2024

  24. [32]

    Ono , A., Uchiyama , H., Yamauchi , S., Nobukawa , M., Nobukawa , K.K., & Koyama , K., 2019, , 71, 3, 52

    2019

  25. [33]

    Ozawa , M., Koyama , K., Yamaguchi , H., Masai , K., & Tamagawa , T., 2009, , 706, 1, L71

    2009

  26. [34]

    Park , S., Muno , M.P., Baganoff , F.K., et al., 2005, , 631, 2, 964

    2005

  27. [35]

    SPIE, volume 13093, 130931K

    Porter, F.S., Kilbourne, C.A., Chiao, M., et al., 2024, in Proc. SPIE, volume 13093, 130931K

    2024

  28. [36]

    & Leahy , D., 2022, , 940, 1, 63

    Ranasinghe , S. & Leahy , D., 2022, , 940, 1, 63

    2022

  29. [37]

    Reid , M.J., 1993, , 31, 345

    1993

  30. [38]

    & Petre , R., 1998, , 503, 2, L167

    Rho , J. & Petre , R., 1998, , 503, 2, L167

    1998

  31. [39]

    Ryu , S.G., Koyama , K., Nobukawa , M., Fukuoka , R., & Tsuru , T.G., 2009, , 61, 751

    2009

  32. [40]

    Ryu , S.G., Nobukawa , M., Nakashima , S., Tsuru , T.G., Koyama , K., & Uchiyama , H., 2013, , 65, 33

    2013

  33. [41]

    Sakano , M., Warwick , R.S., Decourchelle , A., & Predehl , P., 2004, , 350, 1, 129

    2004

  34. [42]

    & Hughes , J.P., 2017, , 840, 2, 112

    Sato , T. & Hughes , J.P., 2017, , 840, 2, 112

    2017

  35. [43]

    Sawada , M., Gu , L., & Yamazaki , R., 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.14937

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Su , M., Slatyer , T.R., & Finkbeiner , D.P., 2010, , 724, 2, 1044

    2010

  37. [45]

    Suzuki , H., Yamaguchi , H., Ishida , M., Uchida , H., Plucinsky , P.P., Foster , A.R., & Miller , E.D., 2020, , 900, 1, 39

    2020

  38. [46]

    SPIE, volume 10699 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 1069922

    Tashiro , M., Maejima , H., Toda , K., et al., 2018, in Proc. SPIE, volume 10699 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 1069922

    2018

  39. [47]

    SPIE, volume 11444, 1144422

    Tashiro , M., Maejima , H., Toda , K., et al., 2020, in Proc. SPIE, volume 11444, 1144422

    2020

  40. [48]

    Terada , Y., Holland , M., Loewenstein , M., et al., 2021, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 7, 037001

    2021

  41. [49]

    Trueba , N., Miller , J.M., Fabian , A.C., et al., 2022, , 925, 2, 113

    2022

  42. [50]

    Tsuboi , M., Handa , T., & Ukita , N., 1999, , 120, 1, 1

    1999

  43. [51]

    Tsuboi , M., Tadaki , K.I., Miyazaki , A., & Handa , T., 2011, , 63, 763

    2011

  44. [52]

    XRISM Collaboration , 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.14301

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Yamaguchi, H., 2020, Astronomische Nachrichten, 341, 2, 150

    2020

  46. [54]

    Yamaguchi , H., Tanaka , T., Wik , D.R., et al., 2018, , 868, 2, L35

    2018

  47. [55]

    Zhou , P., Leung , S.C., Li , Z., Nomoto , K., Vink , J., & Chen , Y., 2021, , 908, 1, 31

    2021

  48. [56]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor eid howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.senten...

  49. [57]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.