pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.01386 · v2 · pith:43IURC7Xnew · submitted 2025-12-01 · 📡 eess.SP

Joint CFO-Channel Estimation under Strong Inter-Cell Interference for Low-Altitude Radio Mapping

Bowen Li , Haotian Zhang , Mu Jia , Junting Chen , Nikolaos Pappas This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 07:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords 5G NR synchronization signalsjoint CFO-channel estimationsuccessive interference cancellationlow-altitude radio mappingUAVinter-cell interferenceper-beam coverage
0
0 comments X

The pith

A successive waveform reconstruction and cancellation framework with joint CFO-channel estimation detects 5G synchronization signals at SINR levels down to -30 dB.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a method to extract per-cell per-beam radio maps from 5G NR synchronization signal bursts observed at low altitudes amid strong overlapping interference. It defines CFO-coherent blocks to support a joint CFO-channel estimator that aggregates multiple SSBs coherently, then applies iterative estimation, reconstruction, and subtraction to peel away stronger base station signals. Simulations confirm detection and parameter recovery at SINR down to -30 dB. Field flights at 150 m altitude produce coverage maps for more than ten BSs and show that measured SINR rarely exceeds 10 dB. Closed-form scaling laws tie estimation accuracy to UAV speed, geometry, burst periodicity, and coherent-block length.

Core claim

The paper claims that successive waveform reconstruction and cancellation, supported by a CFO-coherent block model and joint CFO-channel estimation, permits reliable detection and estimation of ultra-weak synchronization signals from multiple base stations at SINR levels down to -30 dB, with the approach validated through both simulation and 150 m altitude field tests that also reveal typical SINR below 10 dB despite strong received power.

What carries the argument

The successive waveform reconstruction and cancellation framework that iteratively estimates, reconstructs, and subtracts SSs of stronger BSs, enabled by the CFO-coherent block and joint CFO-channel estimator.

If this is right

  • Per-beam coverage maps become feasible for more than ten overlapping base stations in dense low-altitude scenarios.
  • Measured SINR rarely exceeds 10 dB, indicating that interference management is required for reliable aerial operation.
  • Estimation accuracy follows explicit scaling laws with UAV speed, motion geometry, burst periodicity, and CFO-coherent block length.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could be adapted to map other downlink signals or frequency bands where similar burst structures exist.
  • The consistently low observed SINR implies that aerial receivers may need dedicated interference mitigation beyond what terrestrial users require.
  • Relaxing or adapting the CFO-coherent block definition might extend applicability to higher UAV speeds or different mobility patterns.

Load-bearing premise

A CFO-coherent block must exist within which a common-CFO and per-SSB-channel model holds, enabling coherent aggregation of multiple SSBs.

What would settle it

A simulation or field experiment in which the method cannot detect or estimate synchronization signals at -30 dB SINR when multiple SSBs are present and the CFO-coherent block assumption is satisfied would falsify the central performance claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.01386 by Bowen Li, Haotian Zhang, Junting Chen, Mu Jia, Nikolaos Pappas.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The challenge of low-altitude measurement: the decorrelation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Illustration of the 5G NR SS burst structure. (a) Periodic transmission of an SS-burst set with a default periodicity of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Impact of interference on PSS-based timing synchronization and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: SS-burst-set model under multi-cell interference: the per-SSB [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Proposed cross-burst detection and estimation framework. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: SSB index identification via temporal clustering of SS bursts. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Aerial sampling campaign over the CUHK-Shenzhen campus. A DJI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The detection rate, CFO estimation MAE, and Channel estimation NMSE over SINR. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: CFO fluctuation over time during the low-altitude radio-map mea [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Per-beam low-altitude radio maps for all beams 0-7 of the cell with PCI 45, where the red rectangle marks the base-station location. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Per-cell low-altitude radio maps. (a) Power radio maps for representative cells. (b) Integrated SINR radio map combining all detectable cells. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Extending terrestrial networks into low-altitude airspace is a practical way to support aerial services, and accurate low-altitude radio maps are essential for characterizing terrestrial base station (BS) coverage and guiding system design. This work targets per-cell per-beam radio mapping from 5G new radio (NR) synchronization signal (SS) burst sets. Conventional processing treats interference as noise and focuses on the strongest link, which is insufficient to comprehensive awareness of the radio environment and ineffective in dense multi-cell low-altitude scenarios. We propose a successive waveform reconstruction and cancellation framework that iteratively estimates, reconstructs, and subtracts the SSs of stronger BSs, thereby enabling reliable detection and estimation of ultra-weak signals. To support this, we introduce the notion of a carrier frequency offset (CFO)-coherent block within which a common-CFO/per-synchronization signal block (SSB)-channel model holds and design a joint CFO-channel estimator that coherently aggregates multiple SSBs within each CFO-coherent block. We further derive closed-form scaling laws that relate estimation accuracy to unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) speed, motion geometry, burst periodicity, and the length of the CFO-coherent block. Simulations show that the proposed framework can detect and estimate SSs at signal-to-interference-and-noise ratio (SINR) levels down to -30 dB. Field tests at 150 m altitude demonstrate per-beam coverage maps for more than ten overlapping BSs and reveal that, despite strong received power, the measured SINR rarely exceeds 10 dB, underscoring the need for careful interference management in low-altitude airspace.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a successive waveform reconstruction and cancellation framework for joint CFO-channel estimation from 5G NR synchronization signal bursts in strong inter-cell interference. It introduces the concept of a CFO-coherent block in which a common-CFO and per-SSB channel model is assumed to hold, enabling coherent aggregation of multiple SSBs in a joint estimator. Closed-form scaling laws are derived relating estimation accuracy to UAV speed, motion geometry, burst periodicity, and block length. Simulations claim reliable detection and estimation down to -30 dB SINR, while field tests at 150 m altitude produce per-beam coverage maps for more than ten overlapping base stations and show that measured SINR rarely exceeds 10 dB.

Significance. If the CFO-coherent block model and associated scaling laws are valid, the work would provide a practical method for comprehensive low-altitude radio mapping under realistic interference conditions, with direct relevance to UAV network planning and interference management in 5G/6G aerial extensions. The combination of analytical scaling laws with both simulation and field-test results would represent a useful contribution to signal processing for wireless systems in high-mobility, multi-cell environments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and model definition section] The CFO-coherent block assumption (common-CFO/per-SSB-channel constancy enabling coherent aggregation) is load-bearing for the claimed -30 dB detection performance and the validity of the closed-form scaling laws. The manuscript provides no quantitative bound or sensitivity analysis showing that Doppler variation induced by 150 m UAV motion remains negligible over the chosen block length, nor does it demonstrate that residual interference after successive cancellation preserves the model.
  2. [Scaling laws derivation] The closed-form scaling laws relating estimation accuracy to UAV speed, geometry, burst periodicity, and block length are presented as derived quantities, yet no explicit equations or derivation steps are referenced that would allow verification they are independent of any fitted parameters within the paper.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Simulations and field tests] Simulations and field-test descriptions lack error bars, number of Monte Carlo trials, or explicit exclusion criteria for data points, which weakens assessment of statistical reliability for the -30 dB claim and coverage-map results.
  2. [Results] The abstract and results sections would benefit from a direct comparison table showing performance metrics (detection probability, estimation MSE) of the proposed joint estimator versus conventional per-SSB processing at the same low SINR levels.
  3. [Estimator derivation] Notation for the joint estimator (e.g., definitions of the aggregated observation model inside the CFO-coherent block) should be introduced with an equation reference for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of the CFO-coherent block model and the presentation of the scaling laws. We address each major comment below and commit to revisions that strengthen the paper without altering its core contributions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and model definition section] The CFO-coherent block assumption (common-CFO/per-SSB-channel constancy enabling coherent aggregation) is load-bearing for the claimed -30 dB detection performance and the validity of the closed-form scaling laws. The manuscript provides no quantitative bound or sensitivity analysis showing that Doppler variation induced by 150 m UAV motion remains negligible over the chosen block length, nor does it demonstrate that residual interference after successive cancellation preserves the model.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the CFO-coherent block assumption strengthens the claims. The model is justified in the manuscript by the short block duration relative to UAV motion at 150 m altitude, with performance confirmed via simulation at -30 dB SINR and field measurements. However, we acknowledge the absence of a dedicated quantitative sensitivity analysis. In the revision we will add a new subsection deriving an upper bound on residual phase drift over the block length, using the UAV velocity vector, geometry, and SSB periodicity. We will also include analysis and simulation results showing that, after successive cancellation reduces dominant interferers below the noise floor, the common-CFO/per-SSB-channel model continues to hold for the remaining signals. These additions will be placed in the model-definition section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Scaling laws derivation] The closed-form scaling laws relating estimation accuracy to UAV speed, geometry, burst periodicity, and block length are presented as derived quantities, yet no explicit equations or derivation steps are referenced that would allow verification they are independent of any fitted parameters within the paper.

    Authors: The scaling laws are obtained analytically from the Cramér-Rao bound of the joint CFO-channel estimator under the CFO-coherent block model; they contain no empirically fitted parameters. The manuscript states the final closed-form expressions but does not reproduce the intermediate algebraic steps. To address the concern we will expand the derivation section to include the key steps from the signal model through the Fisher information matrix to the final variance expressions, and we will add an appendix containing the complete derivation. This will make the independence from fitted parameters explicit and allow direct verification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: scaling laws derived from geometry and periodicity; model assumptions do not reduce to fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper introduces a CFO-coherent block model and derives closed-form scaling laws relating estimation accuracy to UAV speed, motion geometry, burst periodicity, and block length. These derivations are presented as following from the motion and periodicity inputs rather than from fitted parameters or self-citation chains. No equations or claims in the provided text reduce a prediction or result to its own definition by construction, and the reader's assessment of score 2 aligns with minor or absent load-bearing self-citation. The framework is self-contained against external benchmarks such as field tests and simulations at -30 dB SINR.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central approach rests on the newly introduced CFO-coherent block concept and standard assumptions from estimation theory; one free parameter (block length) is implied by the design.

free parameters (1)
  • length of CFO-coherent block
    Selected according to UAV speed and burst periodicity to maintain the common-CFO model; value not numerically specified in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Common-CFO/per-SSB-channel model holds within each CFO-coherent block
    Invoked to justify coherent aggregation of multiple SSBs for the joint estimator.
invented entities (1)
  • CFO-coherent block no independent evidence
    purpose: Interval definition enabling joint CFO-channel estimation under motion
    New modeling construct introduced to support the estimator; no independent evidence outside the paper is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5835 in / 1274 out tokens · 42973 ms · 2026-05-25T07:10:04.183731+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Privacy-Preserving Federated Radio Map Learning for Wireless Digital Twins via Adaptive Noise Allocation

    eess.SP 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Proposes budget-constrained adaptive noise allocation for privacy-preserving federated radio map learning with RadioUNet, claiming better privacy and reconstruction quality than uniform or static baselines under match...

  2. Model Predictive Communication for Timely Status Updates in Low-Altitude Networks

    eess.SY 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The MPComm framework decomposes a bi-objective optimization into outer timing selection via graph search and inner power/channel allocation with asymptotic optimality, yielding up to 6x less terrestrial interference a...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Trustworthy intelligent networks for low-altitude economy,

    M. Song, Y . Lin, J. Wang, G. Sun, C. Dong, N. Ma, D. Niyato, and P. Zhang, “Trustworthy intelligent networks for low-altitude economy,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 72–79, 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Integrated sensing and communication for low altitude economy: Opportunities and challenges,

    Y . Jiang, X. Li, G. Zhu, H. Li, J. Deng, K. Han, C. Shen, Q. Shi, and R. Zhang, “Integrated sensing and communication for low altitude economy: Opportunities and challenges,”IEEE Commun. Mag., pp. 1–7, 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Optimal base station antenna downtilt in downlink cellular networks,

    J. Yang, M. Ding, G. Mao, Z. Lin, D.-G. Zhang, and T. H. Luan, “Optimal base station antenna downtilt in downlink cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1779–1791, 2019

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Ensuring reliable connectivity to cellular-connected UA Vs with up-tilted antennas and interference coordination,

    M. U. C. Md, G. Ismail, S. Walid, and B. Arupjyoti, “Ensuring reliable connectivity to cellular-connected UA Vs with up-tilted antennas and interference coordination,”ITU Journal on Future and Evolving Technologies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 165–185, 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    What will the future of UA V cellular communications be? a flight from 5G to 6G,

    G. Geraci, A. Garcia-Rodriguez, M. M. Azari, A. Lozano, M. Mezzav- illa, S. Chatzinotas, Y . Chen, S. Rangan, and M. D. Renzo, “What will the future of UA V cellular communications be? a flight from 5G to 6G,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1304–1335, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Predictive communications for low-altitude networks,

    J. Chen, B. Li, H. Sun, S. Cui, and N. Pappas, “Predictive communications for low-altitude networks,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01705

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Mixed-timescale request-driven user association, trajectory and radio resource control for cache-enabled multi-UA V networks,

    S. Chai and V . K. Lau, “Mixed-timescale request-driven user association, trajectory and radio resource control for cache-enabled multi-UA V networks,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 70, pp. 4997–5011, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Full-dimensional beamforming for multi-user MIMO-OFDM ISAC for low-altitude UA V with zero sensing resource allocation,

    Z. Zhou, Y . Zeng, C. Li, F. Yang, Y . Chen, and J. Joung, “Full-dimensional beamforming for multi-user MIMO-OFDM ISAC for low-altitude UA V with zero sensing resource allocation,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06428

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Radio map estimation: A data-driven approach to spectrum cartography,

    D. Romero and S.-J. Kim, “Radio map estimation: A data-driven approach to spectrum cartography,”IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 53–72, 2022

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Integrated interpolation and block-term tensor decomposition for spectrum map construction,

    H. Sun and J. Chen, “Integrated interpolation and block-term tensor decomposition for spectrum map construction,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 72, pp. 3896–3911, 2024

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Deep spectrum cartography: Com- pleting radio map tensors using learned neural models,

    S. Shrestha, X. Fu, and M. Hong, “Deep spectrum cartography: Com- pleting radio map tensors using learned neural models,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 70, pp. 1170–1184, 2022

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Digital twin channel for 6G: Concepts, architectures and potential applications,

    H. Wang, J. Zhang, G. Nie, L. Yu, Z. Yuan, T. Li, J. Wang, and G. Liu, “Digital twin channel for 6G: Concepts, architectures and potential applications,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 24–30, 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    The design and applications of high-performance ray-tracing simulation platform for 5G and beyond wireless communications: A tutorial,

    D. He, B. Ai, K. Guan, L. Wang, Z. Zhong, and T. Kürner, “The design and applications of high-performance ray-tracing simulation platform for 5G and beyond wireless communications: A tutorial,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 10–27, 2019

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    NR; Radio Resource Con- trol (RRC); Protocol specification,

    3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), “NR; Radio Resource Con- trol (RRC); Protocol specification,” 3GPP, Technical Specification (TS) 38.331, Jul 2025, release 18

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    NR; Physical layer procedures for control,

    ——, “NR; Physical layer procedures for control,” 3GPP, Technical Specification (TS) 38.213, Jul 2025, release 18

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    NR; Physical channels and modulation,

    ——, “NR; Physical channels and modulation,” 3GPP, Technical Spec- ification (TS) 38.211, Apr 2025, release 18

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    A comprehensive study on the synchronization procedure in 5G NR with 3GPP-compliant link-level simulator,

    R. Tuninato, D. G. Riviello, R. Garello, B. Melis, and R. Fantini, “A comprehensive study on the synchronization procedure in 5G NR with 3GPP-compliant link-level simulator,”EURASIP J. Wireless Com. Network, vol. 2023, no. 1, p. 111

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Indoor localization with multi-beam of 5G new radio signals,

    X. Zhou, L. Chen, Y . Ruan, and R. Chen, “Indoor localization with multi-beam of 5G new radio signals,”IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11 260–11 275, 2024

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Prach trans- mission employing carrier frequency offset pre-compensation based on measurement at UE for NR uplink,

    S. Yoneda, M. Sawahashi, S. Nagata, and S. Suyama, “Prach trans- mission employing carrier frequency offset pre-compensation based on measurement at UE for NR uplink,”IEICE Trans. on Commun., vol. E108-B, no. 3, pp. 330–338, 2025

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Beam- switching-based time-of-arrival ranging on commercial 5G NR signals for outdoor positioning,

    W. Dong, L. Chen, Z. Ju, T. Zhou, Z. Liu, and R. Chen, “Beam- switching-based time-of-arrival ranging on commercial 5G NR signals for outdoor positioning,”IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., pp. 1–1, 2025

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    NR cell search and MIB and SIB1 recovery,

    MathWorks, “NR cell search and MIB and SIB1 recovery,” https://se.mathworks.com/help/5g/ug/nr-cell-search-and-mib-and- sib1-recovery.html, 2025, accessed: 2025-11-03

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Synchronization techniques for orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA): A tutorial review,

    M. Morelli, C.-C. J. Kuo, and M.-O. Pun, “Synchronization techniques for orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA): A tutorial review,”Proc. IEEE, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 1394–1427, 2007

    work page 2007

  23. [23]

    Improved lattice reduction-aided MIMO successive interference cancellation under imperfect channel estimation,

    J. Park and J. Chun, “Improved lattice reduction-aided MIMO successive interference cancellation under imperfect channel estimation,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 3346–3351, 2012

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    ML estimation of time and frequency offset in OFDM systems,

    J. van de Beek, M. Sandell, and P. Borjesson, “ML estimation of time and frequency offset in OFDM systems,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1800–1805, 1997

    work page 1997

  25. [25]

    Joint estimation of symbol timing and carrier frequency offset of ofdm signals over fast time-varying multipath channels,

    T. Lv, H. Li, and J. Chen, “Joint estimation of symbol timing and carrier frequency offset of ofdm signals over fast time-varying multipath channels,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 4526–4535, 2005

    work page 2005

  26. [26]

    Timing and carrier synchronization with channel estimation in multi-relay cooperative networks,

    A. A. Nasir, H. Mehrpouyan, S. D. Blostein, S. Durrani, and R. A. Kennedy, “Timing and carrier synchronization with channel estimation in multi-relay cooperative networks,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 793–811, 2012

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    Multi-cell MIMO cooperative networks: A new look at inter- ference,

    D. Gesbert, S. Hanly, H. Huang, S. Shamai Shitz, O. Simeone, and W. Yu, “Multi-cell MIMO cooperative networks: A new look at inter- ference,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1380–1408, 2010

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Distributed signal processing for extremely large-scale antenna array systems: State-of-the-art and future directions,

    Y . Xu, E. G. Larsson, E. A. Jorswieck, X. Li, S. Jin, and T.-H. Chang, “Distributed signal processing for extremely large-scale antenna array systems: State-of-the-art and future directions,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 304–330, 2025

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Multiple frequency offset estimation for the downlink of coordinated MIMO systems,

    B. W. Zarikoff and J. K. Cavers, “Multiple frequency offset estimation for the downlink of coordinated MIMO systems,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 901–912, 2008

    work page 2008

  30. [30]

    Computationally efficient equalization for asynchronous cooperative communications with multiple frequency offsets,

    H. Wang, X.-G. Xia, and Q. Yin, “Computationally efficient equalization for asynchronous cooperative communications with multiple frequency offsets,”IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 648–655, 2009

    work page 2009

  31. [31]

    Simultaneous multiple carrier frequency offsets estimation for coordinated multi-point transmission in OFDM systems,

    Y .-R. Tsai, H.-Y . Huang, Y .-C. Chen, and K.-J. Yang, “Simultaneous multiple carrier frequency offsets estimation for coordinated multi-point transmission in OFDM systems,”IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 4558–4568, 2013

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Multi-relay communications in the presence of phase noise and carrier frequency offsets,

    O. H. Salim, A. A. Nasir, H. Mehrpouyan, and W. Xiang, “Multi-relay communications in the presence of phase noise and carrier frequency offsets,”IEEE Trans. on Commun., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 79–94, 2017

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Frequency synchronization for uplink massive mimo systems,

    W. Zhang, F. Gao, S. Jin, and H. Lin, “Frequency synchronization for uplink massive mimo systems,”IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 235–249, 2018

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    BeamSync: Over-the-air synchronization for distributed massive MIMO systems,

    U. Kunnath Ganesan, R. Sarvendranath, and E. G. Larsson, “BeamSync: Over-the-air synchronization for distributed massive MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 6824–6837, 2024

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Blind carrier frequency offset estimation techniques for next-generation multicarrier communication systems: Challenges, comparative analysis, and future prospects,

    S. Singh, S. Kumar, S. Majhi, U. Satija, and C. Yuen, “Blind carrier frequency offset estimation techniques for next-generation multicarrier communication systems: Challenges, comparative analysis, and future prospects,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–36, 2025

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Analysis of the frequency offset effect on Zadoff-Chu sequence timing performance,

    M. Hua, M. Wang, K. W. Yang, and K. J. Zou, “Analysis of the frequency offset effect on Zadoff-Chu sequence timing performance,”IEEE Trans. on Commun., vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 4024–4039, 2014

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    5G; NR; User Equipment (UE) conformance specification; Radio transmission and reception; Part 1: Range 1 standalone,

    3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), “5G; NR; User Equipment (UE) conformance specification; Radio transmission and reception; Part 1: Range 1 standalone,” 3GPP, Technical Specification (TS) 38.521-1, Feb 2025, 3GPP TS 38.521-1 version 18.5.0 Release 18

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    S. M. Kay,Fundamentals of statistical signal processing, Volume I: estimation theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1993

    work page 1993