REVIEW 2 cited by
Analytic Methods for Cosmological Likelihoods
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present general, analytic methods for Cosmological likelihood analysis and solve the "many-parameters" problem in Cosmology. Maxima are found by Newton's Method, while marginalization over nuisance parameters, and parameter errors and covariances are estimated by analytic marginalization of an arbitrary likelihood function with flat or Gaussian priors. We show that information about remaining parameters is preserved by marginalization. Marginalizing over all parameters, we find an analytic expression for the Bayesian evidence for model selection. We apply these methods to data described by Gaussian likelihoods with parameters in the mean and covariance. This method can speed up conventional likelihood analysis by orders of magnitude when combined with Monte-Carlo Markov Chain methods, while Bayesian model selection becomes effectively instantaneous.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Debiasing inference in large-scale structure with non-flat volume measures
A curvature-weighted, non-flat volume measure removes the leading-order marginalization bias in posterior means, recovering cosmological parameters in mocks to below 0.1 sigma.
-
Anomaly detection with spiking neural networks for LHC physics
Claims spiking neural network autoencoders are competitive with conventional autoencoders for LHC anomaly detection across all signal models tested.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.