Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 62 references

HI observations of IC 10 with the DRAO synthesis telescope

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Using about 1,000 hours of H I observations, this paper finds that the inner disk of the starburst dwarf IC 10 can be modeled by stars and gas alone, and that M31 is unlikely to explain the galaxy's outer H I streams.

desk verdict Solid new HI data on IC 10, but the no-dark-matter claim rests on a free M/L fit and the M31 'rule out' overstates what nine simulations can do. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02198 v1 pith:445U3VXF submitted 2019-08-06 astro-ph.GA

Brenda Namumba , Claude Carignan , Tyler Foster , Nathan Deg This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords IC10bluecompactdwarfHI21cmlinerotationcurvedarkmattergalaxydynamicstidalinteractionLocalGroup
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

IC 10, the only blue compact dwarf in the Local Group, is in the middle of a starburst and wears a chaotic, far-flung neutral-hydrogen disk. With roughly 1,000 hours of DRAO synthesis observations, the paper confirms a faint H I cloud first seen with GBT, measures the total H I mass as $7.8\times10^{7}\,M_{\odot}$, and derives a rotation curve that rises steeply (inner slope about $65$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$) before flattening near $30$ km s$^{-1}$. Mass models of the inner disk out to $0.81$ kpc show that stars and gas alone can reproduce the rotation with a physically reasonable stellar mass-to-light ratio of $0.17$; a dark halo is not required inside that radius, though dark matter on larger scales is not excluded. The same data confirm the faint NW feature at $4.7\times10^{5}\,M_{\odot}$ ($\sim0.6\%$ of the H I mass) and reveal a low-column-density bridge to the galaxy. Orbit simulations argue that a past encounter with M31 would leave streams too large and too faint to match the observed southern plume, pointing instead to ongoing cold accretion as the source of the counter-rotating outer H I.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is the tilted-ring rotation-curve fit (ROTCUR) applied to the central velocity field, which yields rotation velocity, position angle, inclination, and systemic velocity for each ring; the resulting curve is corrected for asymmetric drift before mass modeling. Mass decomposition (ROTMAS) combines the gas, stellar, and optional halo contributions in quadrature via $V_{\rm rot}^2 = V_g^2 + V_d^2 + V_h^2$, using the H I surface density scaled by $1.4$ for helium and a stellar profile from WISE $3.4\,\mu$m light with a free mass-to-light ratio. For the interaction question, the machinery is a set of nine GalactICS equilibrium models of IC 10 and M31 that differ only in IC 10's proper motion within the VLBA uncertainties, evolved for $6$ Gyr with the Gadget-2 code and rendered as mock observations at DRAO and GBT resolutions to compare against the observed streams.

What would settle it

Measure the rotation curve beyond $0.8$ kpc with deeper, higher-resolution H I or CO observations: if $V_{\rm rot}$ rises above $\sim30$ km s$^{-1}$ while the baryonic mass profile stays flat, the no-dark-matter model would be falsified, whereas a continuing flat rotation would support it. An independent resolved-stellar-population estimate of the stellar mass-to-light ratio would test the same claim from the mass side.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the inner disk of IC 10 is baryon-dominated. Fitting the DRAO rotation curve out to $0.81$ kpc, the authors find that a model with no dark matter reproduces the steep rise and flattened branch with a reduced $\chi^2$ of $2.2$ and a stellar mass-to-light ratio of $0.17\pm0.08$, close to what is expected for dwarf galaxies. In contrast, an isothermal-halo fit requires an implausibly small stellar mass-to-light ratio of $0.04$, and an NFW fit returns a concentration parameter near $c\sim0.03$ that the authors regard as unphysical in the $\Lambda$CDM context. They therefore conclude that dark matter is not needed to describe the kinematics of the inner disk, while explicitly leaving open the possibility that a halo exists beyond the measured radius. On the interaction question, the nine simulated IC 10--M31 orbits produce, at best, tidal streams that are larger and fainter than the observed southern plume and outer features, so the authors conclude that M31 is unlikely to be their source and that the velocity-dispersion peaks where the features meet the disk indicate ongoing accretion.

Load-bearing premise

The baryon-only result stands on the assumption that the infrared starlight profile and the H I surface density, at the adopted distance and inclination, trace all the baryonic mass of the inner disk; if an unseen stellar component or a very different mass-to-light ratio changes that balance, a dark halo could be needed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The inner disk of IC 10 out to $0.81$ kpc is baryon-dominated, so any dark matter in the galaxy must set in beyond that radius at column densities below current sensitivity.
  • The steep inner rotation slope of roughly $65$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ indicates a very concentrated baryonic mass distribution in the starburst core, about three times steeper than typical dwarf galaxies.
  • The faint NW H I cloud is real at $4.7\times10^{5}\,M_{\odot}$ and connects to IC 10 by a low-column-density bridge, making it a target for deeper, higher-resolution H I follow-up to decide between a bound companion and tidal debris.
  • The DRAO mosaic recovers the full single-dish H I mass of IC 10 ($7.8\times10^{7}\,M_{\odot}$), about 36% more than the VLA-based measurement, so large-scale faint structure is no longer being missed by interferometers.
  • If M31 did not create the outer H I spurs and the southern plume, the counter-rotation and elevated velocity dispersions at the interfaces support ongoing cold accretion as the driver of the starburst.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the baryon-dominated inner disk is typical of blue compact dwarfs, starburst-triggering galaxies may assemble their central baryons before building an extended dark halo; a survey of a dozen BCDs with the same mass-model treatment could test that.
  • The simulations fix IC 10's dark halo as a double-power-law profile with inner slope $\alpha=1$ and sample only nine proper-motion vectors, so the M31 rule-out is provisional: adding M33 or adopting a different IC 10 halo could change the predicted stream size and surface density.
  • The NW cloud and its bridge are consistent with a dwarf-dwarf accretion event; high-resolution H I or CO observations of the cloud's internal velocity gradient could distinguish cold accretion from tidal debris.
  • Because the no-DM fit has the lowest reduced-$\chi^2$ among physically plausible models, IC 10 is a clean test case for baryonic scaling relations: if it lies on the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation using stars and gas only, the baryon-dominated inner disk is dynamically consistent.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents approximately 1000 hours of DRAO synthesis telescope observations of the 21 cm HI line in the blue compact dwarf galaxy IC 10, with EBHIS single-dish data added to recover short spacings. The authors confirm the faint NW HI feature previously detected with the GBT, measure its mass as 4.7e5 Msun, and recover a total HI mass of 7.8e7 Msun that matches the GBT value, demonstrating that the interferometric data have not lost extended flux. They derive an inner-disk rotation curve out to 0.81 kpc using tilted-ring fits, find a steep inner rise followed by a flattening with Vmax about 30 km/s, and agree well with the earlier LITTLE THINGS rotation curve of Oh et al. (2015). The paper then fits ISO, NFW, and no-dark-matter mass models, concluding that the inner disk can be described without a dark matter halo, while not excluding dark matter on larger scales. Finally, a suite of nine Gadget-2 simulations of possible IC 10-M31 interactions is used to argue that the outer HI features are unlikely to be produced by M31 and that the observed velocity dispersions at the contact of the HI extensions with the main disk indicate ongoing accretion.

Significance. The observational contribution is solid and valuable: the DRAO data, after careful flux calibration and short-spacing correction, recover the total HI mass measured by the GBT, confirm the faint NW feature, and extend the detected HI disk beyond previous interferometric work. The rotation curve agreement with Oh et al. (2015) gives independent confidence in the kinematics. If the no-dark-matter interpretation is accepted, IC 10 becomes another example of a blue compact dwarf whose inner disk can be baryon-dominated, a useful counterpoint to standard dwarf-galaxy dark matter scaling relations. The simulations also make a concrete, falsifiable statement: M31-induced tidal streams should be more extended and at lower column density than current observations reach, so deeper HI observations can test this scenario. The main limitations are the mass-model degeneracy, which depends on a freely fitted stellar mass-to-light ratio, and the limited sampling of orbital and galaxy-model parameter space in the interaction simulations; these limit the strength of the headline conclusions but not the archival value of the data.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4.3.3, Table 5 and Figure 11] The claim that the inner disk of IC 10 can be described without a dark matter halo rests on a free fit of the stellar mass-to-light ratio, M/L = 0.17 +/- 0.08, which is about 3.5 times lower than the WISE-color value of 0.6 derived from Eq. (9), and no independent stellar-population or SED constraint is provided. At the same time, the no-DM model has the worst reduced chi-squared (2.2) of the three models; the preference for it is obtained only after rejecting the ISO fit because its M/L = 0.04 is unphysical and the NFW fit because its concentration parameter is unphysical. The conclusion would be considerably strengthened by a robustness test with M/L fixed to a physically motivated value, such as 0.2, or by a quantitative discussion of the inclination, distance, and non-circular-motion systematics that would be needed to reconcile M/L = 0.6 with the observed rotation curve. As written, the abstract's 'without the need of a dark matter halo' goes beyond what this fit alone demonstrates.
  2. [Section 5.3 and Table 6] The sentence 'The simulations do rule out M31 as a source for the Southern stream' is stronger than the simulation campaign supports. Only nine proper-motion orbits are sampled, and only a single GalactICS model of IC 10 is used, with a double-power-law dark halo of inner slope alpha = 1 and scale radius 2 kpc; the paper itself acknowledges a large unexplored parameter space, including the possible influence of M33 and variations in the galaxy models. The robust statement from Figures 12-14 is that, for the tested orbits, the simulated M31-induced features are larger and at lower surface density than the observed features, making an M31 origin less plausible. The word 'rule out' should either be softened to 'strongly disfavoured' or supported by additional model variations and a more systematic orbit sampling.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table 1] The entries for Galactic latitude and Galactic longitude appear to be swapped (the text gives l = 118.95 deg and b = -3.33 deg), and the proper-motion units are printed as 'kms 2'; both should be corrected.
  2. [Section 4] The task name 'MOMNT' appears to be a typo and should read 'MOMENT'.
  3. [Section 5.3] The text refers to 'Fig. 4.12' in the discussion of the tidal stream; this should be Fig. 12.
  4. [Sections 3.1 and 6] The paper states in Section 3.1 that the DRAO HI mass is larger than the VLA value by about 36%, but Section 6(ii) says about 33%; these numbers should be reconciled.
  5. [Section 4.3.1] Equation (9) mixes W1/W2 notation with 3.4/4.6 micron notation; the band definitions should be stated once and used consistently.
  6. [References] The Deg et al. (2018) reference is listed as 'in prep'; if it has since appeared, the citation should be updated, otherwise a version or access date for the GalactICS code should be provided.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the rotation-curve mass models are straightforward fits with free parameters, and no prediction reduces to a fitted value by construction.

full rationale

This paper is an observational study. The central claim that the inner disk of IC 10 can be described without a dark matter halo is the outcome of fitting mass models to the DRAO rotation curve in Section 4.3, not a prediction from a previously fitted parameter. The stellar M/L is a free parameter in the no-DM fit (Table 5 gives M/L = 0.17 ± 0.08), and the paper explicitly notes that the WISE-color M/L of 0.6 was too large and that Equation 9 may not be usable for blue dwarf galaxies; this is an admitted model choice, not a circular reduction. The ISO and NFW halo fits also have free parameters, and the rejection of those models on grounds of unphysical fitted values (M/L = 0.04, c ≈ 0.03) is a model-selection statement, not a self-referential derivation. The M31-interaction simulations rest on the GalactICS IC 10 model and the Deg et al. (2018) code, but the paper itself flags the unexplored parameter space and the omission of M33, distance, and radial-velocity uncertainties in Section 5.3; this is a limitation in the strength of an exclusion claim, not circularity. No equation in the paper is equivalent by construction to its own input, and the externally anchored WISE-color estimate and Lelli et al. (2016) comparison provide independent reference points rather than load-bearing self-citations. The only self-citations (Namumba et al. 2017, 2018 for inner slopes; Deg et al. 2018 for the code) are contextual or instrumental and do not carry the central argument.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rely on standard mass-modeling assumptions and on a simulation IC 10 model whose dark halo is ad hoc. The free parameters are dominated by fitted mass-model parameters; the no-dark-matter conclusion depends on the fitted stellar M/L.

free parameters (8)
  • Stellar mass-to-light ratio (no-DM fit) = 0.17 +/- 0.08
    Fitted to the rotation curve in Section 4.3.3; lower than the WISE color-based estimate of 0.6, it allows the baryon-only model to reproduce the observed velocities.
  • Stellar mass-to-light ratio (ISO fit) = 0.04 +/- 0.04
    Best-fit M/L in the pseudo-isothermal halo model; the authors deem it too small to make physical sense.
  • ISO halo core radius rc = 0.21 +/- 0.03 kpc
    Fitted halo parameter in the ISO model in Section 4.3.3.
  • ISO central density rho0 = 476.33 +/- 230.02 (10^-3 Msun pc^-3)
    Fitted halo parameter in the ISO model in Section 4.3.3.
  • NFW concentration c = 0.03 +/- 186.95
    Fitted NFW concentration, unphysical in LambdaCDM (c<1), used by the authors to reject this model.
  • NFW R200 = 852.42 +/- 205987.91 kpc
    Fitted NFW virial radius; the large uncertainty reflects the poor fit to the inner rotation curve.
  • Inclination = 47 +/- 6 degrees
    Adopted from the tilted-ring fit (Section 4.2); the rotation curve amplitude scales as 1/sin(i).
  • Position angle = 65 +/- 4 degrees
    Adopted from the tilted-ring fit (Section 4.2); affects the projection of the velocity field.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Distance to IC 10 is 0.7 Mpc (Hunter et al. 2012).
    Used in Eq. 1 to convert total flux to HI mass and to convert angular radii to kpc throughout Section 4.
  • domain assumption HI gas is a thin disk, with surface density multiplied by 1.4 for helium and metals.
    Section 4.3.1: 'The H i surface distribution was then multiplied by a factor of 1.4 to account for helium and other metals.'
  • domain assumption Stellar mass distribution follows the WISE 3.4 micron surface brightness with a single, constant mass-to-light ratio.
    Section 4.3.1, Eq. 8 converts brightness to mass density; the M/L is fitted in Section 4.3.3.
  • ad hoc to paper The GalactICS IC 10 model with a double-power-law dark halo (alpha=1, rh=2 kpc, sigma_h=31 km/s) is a valid representation of IC 10 for the M31 encounter simulations.
    Section 5.1 and Table 6; these halo parameters are not constrained by the inner-disk mass model and are chosen to give the same rotation curve, gas mass, and scale lengths as observed.
  • domain assumption The proper motions from Brunthaler et al. (2007) correctly specify IC 10's tangential velocity.
    Section 5.2 uses these values to define the nine simulation orbits spanning the proper-motion uncertainties.
  • standard math The tilted-ring model (Eq. 2) describes the inner disk kinematics with circular orbits and a constant inclination and position angle per ring.
    Section 4.1 assumes this model; the velocity field residual map shows a 6.2 km/s rms scatter, indicating some non-circular motions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of HI observations of IC 10 with the DRAO synthesis telescope." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/445U3VXF

@misc{pith2026190802198,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: HI observations of IC 10 with the DRAO synthesis telescope},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/445U3VXF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02198}
}
abstract

HI observations of the nearby blue compact dwarf galaxy IC 10 obtained with the Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory synthesis telescope (DRAO), for a total integration of $\sim$1000 hours, are presented. We confirm the NW faint 21 cm HI emission feature discovered in GBT observations. The HI feature has an HI mass of 4.7 $\times 10^{5}$ M$_{\odot}$, which is only $\sim$ 0.6$\%$ of the total HI mass of the galaxy (7.8 $\times 10^{7}$ M$_{\odot}$). In the inner disk, the rotation curve of IC 10 rises steeply, then flattens until the last point where it rises again, with a maximum velocity of 30 km s$^{-1}$. Based on our mass models, the kinematics of the inner disk of IC 10 can be described without the need of a dark matter halo. However, this does not exclude the possible presence of dark matter on a larger scale. It is unlikely that the disturbed features seen in the outer HI disk of IC 10 are caused by an interaction with M 31. Features seen from our simulations are larger and at lower surface density than can be reached by current observations. The higher velocity dispersions seen in regions where several distinct HI features meet with the main core of IC 10 suggests that there is ongoing accretion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.02198 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of the Hi global profile of IC 10 from the DRAO map (solid line, this work), from the VLA LITTLE THINGS (dash-dotted line, Hunter et al. (2012)), and from the GBT map (dotted line, Nidever et al. (2013). calculated as MHi = 2.36 × 105  D Mpc2 Z FdV (1) where R FdV is the source total flux in units of Jy km s−1 and D is the distance in Mpc. Adopting a distance of 0.7 Mpc (Hunter et al. 2012), a total Hi … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Moment maps of IC 10 created using the SoFiA software [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Integrated Hi column density contours of IC 10 from the DRAO data overlaid on a WISE 3.4 µm map. The Hi column density contours are at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 × 1020 cm−2 . The synthesized beam is shown in the bottom left corner. 196.2 ± 2.3 Jy km s−1 is measured from the intensity map, corresponding to an Hi mass of (2.300 ± 0.026) × 107 M adopting a distance of 0.7 Mpc. This corresponds to ∼ 33% of the total Hi… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Integrated column density map of the Hi feature at 30 resolution for the velocity range -412 km s−1 ≤ -388 km s−1 . The 3σ column density limit at 3 arcmin is 4 × 1018 cm−2 . At this column density, the Hi cloud is clearly detected. (b) and (c) integrated column de…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of the Hi global profile of IC 10 central region (solid line) and the outer region of IC 10 (dash-dotted line). 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 i n c l : ( o ) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 Radius (kpc) 0 20 40 60 80 100 P : A : ( o ) 0 50 100 150 200 250 Ra…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Results of the tilted ring fit of IC 10. The top panel shows the inclination, the middle panel the major axis position angle, and the bottom panel shows the final rotation curves. Red upward triangles are the results of the receding side, blue down￾wards triangles for …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Maps of the central disk of IC 10: Observed velocity field 7(a), model velocity field map 7(b), residual map 7(c), intensity map 7(d), and velocity dispersion map 7(e). The observed and model velocity field contours run from -370 to -330 km s−1 in steps of 5 km s−1 . T…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Hi surface density profile of IC 10 derived from gipsy task ELLINT. theory. The density ρNFW is given by ρNFW(r) = ρs  r/rs 1 + r/rs 2 , (10) where ρs and rs are the characteristic density and scale ra￾dius of the NFW halo. The NFW halo rotation curve is given by …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of the IC 10 DRAO rotation curve (red circles) with the analysis by Oh et al. (2015) (green circles). The black arrow indicates the region used in the Oh et al. (2015) analysis. constant used for conversion from mag arcsec−2 to L pc−2 and is calculated as C3…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Mass distribution models of IC 10 with ISO (top panel), NFW (middle panel) and no dark matter halo (bottom panel). The blue filled circles present the observed rotation curve, the black dotted lines the model rotation curve, the darkgreen dotted lines indicate the dar…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Mock images of the final state of the IC 10 gas disk in the nine simulations. The labels indicate the proper motions used to determine the initial conditions. The maps use a logarithmic surface density. The axes are in units of degrees. tures are unlikely to be caused…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: A mock observation of the (µα + ∆α, µδ + ∆δ) snap￾shot using 18 arcmin pixels and truncated the surface density below 6.9 × 1018 cm−2 . The axes are in units of degrees [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: A mock observation of the (µα + ∆α, µδ + ∆δ) snap￾shot using 4 arcmin pixels and truncated the surface density below 7 × 1017 cm−2 . The axes are in units of degrees. is important to use the stream simulations rather than the impressive suite of orbits used in Nidever…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G., Johnson M., Nidever D

    Ashley T., Elmegreen B. G., Johnson M., Nidever D. L., Simpson C. E., Pokhrel N. R., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/148/6/130 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AJ....148..130A 148, 130

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/148/6/130 2014

  2. [2]

    G., 1989, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989A

    Begeman K. G., 1989, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989A

    1989

  3. [3]

    G., Broeils A

    Begeman K. G., Broeils A. H., Sanders R. H., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/249.3.523 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991MNRAS.249..523B 249, 523

    doi:10.1093/mnras/249.3.523 1991

  4. [4]

    Bekki K., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00489.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.388L..10B 388, L10

    arXiv 2008

  5. [5]

    J., Falcke H., Henkel C., Menten K

    Brunthaler A., Reid M. J., Falcke H., Henkel C., Menten K. M., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066430 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066430 2007

  6. [6]

    Chemin L., Carignan C., Foster T., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1395 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...705.1395C 705, 1395

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/705/2/1395 2009

  7. [7]

    Cloet-Osselaer A., De Rijcke S., Vandenbroucke B., Schroyen J., Koleva M., Verbeke R., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1071 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.442.2909C 442, 2909

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1071 2014

  8. [8]

    E., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/90 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...782...90C 782, 90

    Cluver M. E., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/90 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...782...90C 782, 90

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/782/2/90 2014

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    C., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/316883 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....120.3027C 120, 3027

    C \^o t \'e S., Carignan C., Freeman K. C., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/316883 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....120.3027C 120, 3027

    2000 doi

  2. [10]

    M., Randriamampandry T

    Deg N., Widrow L. M., Randriamampandry T. H., Carignan C., 2018, in prep

    2018

  3. [11]

    C., 1970, @doi [ ] 10.1086/150474 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1970ApJ...160..811F 160, 811

    Freeman K. C., 1970, @doi [ ] 10.1086/150474 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1970ApJ...160..811F 160, 811

    1970 doi

  4. [12]

    Gerbrandt S. A. N., McConnachie A. W., Irwin M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2029 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.1000G 454, 1000

    2015 doi

  5. [13]

    F., Pevunova O., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/374737 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2003ApJS..147...29G 147, 29

    Gil de Paz A., Madore B. F., Pevunova O., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/374737 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2003ApJS..147...29G 147, 29

    2003 doi

  6. [14]

    K., 1999, in Whitelock P., Cannon R., eds, IAU Symposium Vol

    Grebel E. K., 1999, in Whitelock P., Cannon R., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 192, The Stellar Content of Local Group Galaxies. p. 17 ( @eprint astro-ph/9812443 )

    1999 arXiv

  7. [15]

    K., 1979, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979A

    Huchtmeier W. K., 1979, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979A

    1979

  8. [16]

    A., Elmegreen B

    Hunter D. A., Elmegreen B. G., 2006, @doi [ ], 162, 49

    2006

  9. [17]

    A., Elmegreen B

    Hunter D. A., Elmegreen B. G., Baker A. L., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305158 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...493..595H 493, 595

    1998 doi

  10. [18]

    A., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/134 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144..134H 144, 134

    Hunter D. A., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/134 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144..134H 144, 134

    2012 doi

  11. [19]

    Kennicutt Jr. R. C., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167834 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...344..685K 344, 685

    1989 doi

  12. [20]

    G., Im M., Karoji H., Noumaru J., Tanaka I., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/816 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2009ApJ...703..816K 703, 816

    Kim M., Kim E., Hwang N., Lee M. G., Im M., Karoji H., Noumaru J., Tanaka I., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/816 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2009ApJ...703..816K 703, 816

    2009 doi

  13. [21]

    T., ed., IAU Symposium Vol

    Kormendy J., 1987, in de Zeeuw P. T., ed., IAU Symposium Vol. 127, Structure and Dynamics of Elliptical Galaxies. pp 17--34

    1987

  14. [22]

    L., Gray A

    Kothes R., Landecker T. L., Gray A. D., 2010, in Kothes R., Landecker T. L., Willis A. G., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 438, The Dynamic Interstellar Medium: A Celebration of the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey. p. 415 ( @eprint arXiv 1010.6109 )

    2010 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Kuijken K., Dubinski J., 1995, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995MNRAS.277.1341K 277, 1341

    1995

  16. [24]

    L., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:2000257 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A

    Landecker T. L., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:2000257 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A

    2000 doi

  17. [25]

    C., Salzer J

    Lee J. C., Salzer J. J., Melbourne J., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/425156 , http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/2004ApJ...616..752L 616, 752

    2004 doi

  18. [26]

    Lelli F., Verheijen M., Fraternali F., Sancisi R., 2012a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117867 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    doi

  19. [27]

    Lelli F., Verheijen M., Fraternali F., Sancisi R., 2012b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219457 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    doi

  20. [28]

    S., Schombert J

    Lelli F., McGaugh S. S., Schombert J. M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/157 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152..157L 152, 157

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    K., Walter F., Brinks E., Bigiel F., de Blok W

    Leroy A. K., Walter F., Brinks E., Bigiel F., de Blok W. J. G., Madore B., Thornley M. D., 2008, @doi [ ], 136, 2782

    2008

  22. [30]

    1035 of American Institute of Physics Conference Series, IC 10-a cosmic bluebottle

    Manthey E., Oosterloo T., 2008, in Minchin R., Momjian E., eds, The Evolution of Galaxies Through the Neutral Hydrogen Window Vol. 1035 of American Institute of Physics Conference Series, IC 10-a cosmic bluebottle . pp 156--158

    2008

  23. [31]

    L., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.435 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ARA

    Mateo M. L., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.435 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ARA

    1998 doi

  24. [32]

    R., Mackie G., Carignan C., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/117013 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994AJ....107.2021M 107, 2021

    Meurer G. R., Mackie G., Carignan C., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/117013 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994AJ....107.2021M 107, 2021

    1994 doi

  25. [33]

    R., Carignan C., Beaulieu S

    Meurer G. R., Carignan C., Beaulieu S. F., Freeman K. C., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/117895 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1996AJ....111.1551M 111, 1551

    1996 doi

  26. [34]

    R., Staveley-Smith L., Killeen N

    Meurer G. R., Staveley-Smith L., Killeen N. E. B., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01905.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1998MNRAS.300..705M 300, 705

    1998

  27. [35]

    Namumba B., Carignan C., de Blok W. J. G., Passmoor S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2256 , 472, 3761

    2017 doi

  28. [36]

    Namumba B., Carignan C., Passmoor S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1056 , 478, 487

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    F., Frenk C

    Navarro J. F., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/304888 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...490..493N 490, 493

    1997 doi

  30. [38]

    L., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/779/2/L15 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...779L..15N 779, L15

    Nidever D. L., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/779/2/L15 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...779L..15N 779, L15

    2013 doi

  31. [39]

    G., Iglesias-P \'a ramo J., V \' lchez J

    Noeske K. G., Iglesias-P \'a ramo J., V \' lchez J. M., Papaderos P., Fricke K. J., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010446 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A

    2001 doi

  32. [40]

    Oh S.-H., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/149/6/180 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....149..180O 149, 180

    2015 doi

  33. [41]

    Prugniel P., Simien F., 1997, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A

    1997

  34. [42]

    G., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010206 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A

    Richer M. G., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010206 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A

    2001 doi

  35. [43]

    Sanders J., L., Binney J., 2013, MNRAS, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.1813S 433, 1813

    2013

  36. [44]

    Sargent W. L. W., Searle L., 1970, @doi [ ] 10.1086/180644 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1970ApJ...162L.155S 162, L155

    1970 doi

  37. [45]

    J., Finkbeiner D

    Schlegel D. J., Finkbeiner D. P., Davis M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305772 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...500..525S 500, 525

    1998 doi

  38. [46]

    Serra P., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv079 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448.1922S 448, 1922

    2015 doi

  39. [47]

    S., Skillman E

    Shostak G. S., Skillman E. D., 1989, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989A

    1989

  40. [48]

    Springel V., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.364.1105S 364, 1105

    2005

  41. [49]

    D., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/116413 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993AJ....105..128T 105, 128

    Taylor C., Brinks E., Skillman E. D., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/116413 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993AJ....105..128T 105, 128

    1993 doi

  42. [50]

    L., Brinks E., Grashuis R

    Taylor C. L., Brinks E., Grashuis R. M., Skillman E. D., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192193 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJS...99..427T 99, 427

    1995 doi

  43. [51]

    L., Brinks E., Grashuis R

    Taylor C. L., Brinks E., Grashuis R. M., Skillman E. D., 1996a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192256 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJS..102..189T 102, 189

    doi

  44. [52]

    L., Thomas D

    Taylor C. L., Thomas D. L., Brinks E., Skillman E. D., 1996b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192358 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJS..107..143T 107, 143

    doi

  45. [53]

    R., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/375301 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....125.3145T 125, 3145

    Taylor A. R., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/375301 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....125.3145T 125, 3145

    2003 doi

  46. [54]

    Weldrake D. T. F., de Blok W. J. G., Walter F., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06170.x , http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/2003MNRAS.340...12W 340, 12

    2003

  47. [55]

    M., Pym B., Dubinski J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/587636 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...679.1239W 679, 1239

    Widrow L. M., Pym B., Dubinski J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/587636 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...679.1239W 679, 1239

    2008 doi

  48. [56]

    M., Miller B

    Wilcots E. M., Miller B. W., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300595 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....116.2363W 116, 2363

    1998 doi

  49. [57]

    Winkel B., Kerp J., Fl \"o er L., Kalberla P. M. W., Ben Bekhti N., Keller R., Lenz D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2016A&A...585A..41W 585, A41

    2016 doi

  50. [58]

    R., Bernard-Salas J., Spoon H

    Wu Y., Charmandaris V., Hao L., Brandl B. R., Bernard-Salas J., Spoon H. W. W., Houck J. R., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/499226 , http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/2006ApJ...639..157W 639, 157

    2006 doi

  51. [59]

    de Blok W. J. G., Walter F., Brinks E., Trachternach C., Oh S.-H., Kennicutt Jr. R. C., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2648 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136.2648D 136, 2648

    2008 doi

  52. [60]

    de Vaucouleurs G., de Vaucouleurs A., Corwin Jr. H. G., Buta R. J., Paturel G., Fouqu \'e P., 1991a, Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies. Volume I: Explanations and references

  53. [61]

    de Vaucouleurs G., de Vaucouleurs A., Corwin Jr. H. G., Buta R. J., Paturel G., Fouqu \'e P., 1991b, Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies. Volume I: Explanations and references. Volume II: Data for galaxies between 0 ^ h and 12 ^ h . Volume III: Data for galaxies betwe...

  54. [62]

    P., Fardal M., Besla G., Beaton R

    van der Marel R. P., Fardal M., Besla G., Beaton R. L., Sohn S. T., Anderson J., Brown T., Guhathakurta P., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/8 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...753....8V 753, 8

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.