A positive answer on the existence of correlations between positive earthquake magnitude differences
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:4AFRHF5Qrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
The identification of patterns in space, time, and magnitude, which could potentially encode the subsequent earthquake magnitude, represents a significant challenge in earthquake forecasting. A pivotal aspect of this endeavor involves the search for correlations between earthquake magnitudes, a task greatly hindered by the incompleteness of instrumental catalogs. A novel strategy to address this challenge is provided by the groundbreaking observation by Van der Elst (Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2021), that positive magnitude differences, under certain conditions, remain unaffected by incompleteness. In this letter we adopt this strategy which provides a clear and unambiguous proof regarding the existence of correlations between subsequent positive magnitude differences. Our results are consistent with a time-dependent b-value in the Gutenberg-Richter law, significantly enhancing existing models for seismic forecasting.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Earthquake magnitudes depend on seismic history, as revealed by a neural network analysis
Neural network analysis of hypocenter catalogs extracts modest predictive information about future earthquake magnitudes beyond the time-independent Gutenberg-Richter distribution in three regions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.