Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 37 references

Regularities in the spectrum of chaotic p-modes in rapidly rotating stars

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that chaotic pressure modes in rapidly rotating stars are organized into series with a nearly regular frequency spacing—a pseudo large separation—set by the mean acoustic travel time between surface rebounds.

desk verdict The paper mostly makes its case that chaotic p-modes in rapid rotators show a real pseudo large separation close to the island-mode spacing, but the semiclassical derivation leans on an unvalidated chord-to-periodic-orbit proxy and the main-peak position is quoted inconsistently. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05143 v2 pith:4AW6G6YD submitted 2019-08-14 astro-ph.SR nlin.CD

Benjamin Evano , François Lignières , Bertrand Georgeot This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRnlin.CD
keywords asteroseismologywavechaoschaoticp-modesrapidrotationfrequencyautocorrelationlargeseparationacousticraysperiodicorbittheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

In rapidly rotating stars, pressure modes that follow chaotic ray paths have been treated as spectrally irregular, describable only by statistical laws. This paper argues that high-frequency chaotic p-modes are instead organized into series of modes separated by an almost constant frequency interval, a 'pseudo large separation' $\Delta_c$. Its value is close to the large separation of the regular island modes and is set by the mean acoustic travel time $T_0$ between two rebounds of a ray at the stellar surface, roughly $\Delta_c\approx 2\pi/T_0$. The paper derives this from a semiclassical periodic-orbit analysis of the frequency autocorrelation and supports it with two-dimensional oscillation computations at six rotation rates. If correct, chaotic modes—which reach the stellar core—become usable seismic diagnostics, and observed regular spacings in fast rotators may include a chaotic contribution.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the distribution of acoustic travel times of surface-to-surface chords, modelled as a sum of Gaussian packets $P_{n,\Omega}(T)=\frac{T_0}{\sqrt{2\pi n}\,\sigma_0}\exp\left(-\frac{(T-nT_0)^2}{2(\sqrt{n}\sigma_0)^2}\right)$, with $T_0$ the mean one-chord travel time and $\sigma_0$ its standard deviation. Inserted into the semiclassical form factor $K(T)\approx \sum_j A_j^2\,\delta(T-T_j)$—the diagonal approximation of periodic-orbit theory—this distribution makes the Fourier-transformed autocorrelation develop a peak at $2\pi/T_0$. The machinery also includes the meridional estimate $T_{\mathrm{av}}=2\left(\frac{2}{\pi}\int_0^{\pi/2}\tau(\theta)\,d\theta\right)$, which gives $\Delta_c$ without ray tracing.

What would settle it

Compute chaotic p-mode spectra in a rotating polytropic model with homogeneous (non-stratified) sound speed: the chord travel-time distribution then has $\sigma_0\approx 0.32\,T_0$, so the semiclassical theory predicts no autocorrelation peak, and a strong residual peak would falsify the proposed mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that chaotic p-mode spectra in rapidly rotating stars contain reproducible order rather than being featureless. Frequency autocorrelations of numerically computed chaotic spectra show a main peak at a spacing $\Delta_c$, and échelle diagrams show frequencies falling into series whose consecutive members are separated by roughly $\Delta_c$ and share similar amplitude patterns. The semiclassical explanation is that the strong decrease of sound speed near the stellar surface makes the acoustic travel time of a surface-to-surface chord nearly path-independent: chord travel times cluster in narrow packets with mean $nT_0$ and width $\sqrt{n}\,\sigma_0$, with $\sigma_0\ll T_0$. In periodic-orbit theory this packet structure produces an autocorrelation peak at $\Delta_c\approx 2\pi/T_0$, whose height and width are controlled by $\sigma_0/T_0$. The same small spread explains why $\Delta_c$ nearly equals the island-mode large separation $\Delta_i$, while secondary autocorrelation peaks are attributed to partial barriers that trap chaotic rays near stable island chains.

Load-bearing premise

The theory assumes that the travel-time distribution of the actual periodic orbits that shape the spectrum is faithfully represented by the distribution of finite samples of surface-to-surface chord trajectories, modelled as Gaussian packets with means $nT_0$ and widths $\sqrt{n}\,\sigma_0$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fast rotators should show a single large separation $\Delta\approx\Delta_i\approx\Delta_c$, so autocorrelation peaks seen in observed delta Scuti-type stars may be produced partly by chaotic modes, not only by island modes.
  • Because chaotic modes spread over the whole meridional plane, they probe the stellar core at high frequency, complementing whispering-gallery and island modes that remain confined near the surface or around particular orbits.
  • The pseudo large separation can be estimated directly from the stellar model by averaging the radial acoustic time over the meridional plane and taking $2\pi/T_{\mathrm{av}}$, without computing the full mode spectrum.
  • As rotation approaches the breakup rate, the ratio $\sigma_0/T_0$ grows, the chord travel-time packets overlap, and the chaotic spectrum becomes less regular, consistent with the decreasing peak height seen in the simulations.
  • In a combined odd-and-even parity spectrum, chaotic modes should show no peak at half the large separation, whereas island modes do, offering a practical way to separate the two families.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This extends beyond the paper: if $\Delta_c$ is governed mainly by the radial sound-speed profile, the same pseudo large separation should appear in any strongly stratified wave-bearing object, from gas-giant interiors to laboratory acoustic cavities with a sharp refractive-index gradient.
  • This extends beyond the paper: the chord-packet proxy could be checked directly by numerically searching for true periodic orbits in the ray model and comparing their travel-time histogram with the Gaussian packets; a mismatch would not remove the numerical peak but would require a revised semiclassical derivation.
  • This extends beyond the paper: if chaotic series are remnants of spherical-degree $\ell_s$ series, the pseudo large separation plus amplitude similarity may allow effective spherical degrees to be assigned to chaotic modes in observed spectra, widening the standard asteroseismic classification toolkit.
  • This extends beyond the paper: the strength and position of secondary autocorrelation peaks could act as a seismic indicator of phase-space transport barriers around island chains, since the authors tie these peaks to partial barriers whose trapping efficiency varies with rotation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies high-frequency chaotic p-modes in strongly rotating polytropic stellar models, using the 2D oscillation code TOP for mode frequencies and ray simulations for the acoustic dynamics. The authors report peaks in the frequency autocorrelation of chaotic spectra, interpret the main peak as a pseudo large separation Δc, and derive a semiclassical expression relating Δc to the mean one-chord acoustic travel time T0. They further attribute secondary peaks to phase-space partial barriers near stable islands, show that Δc is close to the island-mode large separation, and draw observational consequences for rapidly rotating δ Scuti stars. The numerical autocorrelation peaks and the agreement of the nearest-neighbor statistics with the Wigner surmise are independent, reproducible checks of the mode classification and of the spectral regularity.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper identifies a new, non-generic regularity in chaotic p-mode spectra of rotating stars and provides a physical explanation based on the strong radial variation of the sound speed. This is of clear asteroseismic interest because it suggests a unique large separation Δ ≈ Δi ≈ Δc for rapid rotators and offers a possible observational discriminator between island and chaotic modes (the half-separation peak). The paper's strengths are the use of independent numerical mode computations and ray simulations, a parameter-free prediction of the peak position from T0 rather than from a fit to the mode frequencies, and falsifiable statements about observable autocorrelation features. The main caveat is that the key semiclassical step identifies the periodic-orbit travel-time density with the n-chord Gaussian packet distribution without a direct validation, so the theoretical explanation of the numerical peak, though plausible, is not yet fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.1.2, Eq. (18)] The semiclassical prediction Δth_c ≈ 2π/T0 is derived from the form factor K(T), which in the trace formula is a sum over true periodic orbits, yet the travel-time density of periodic orbits is replaced by the n-chord Gaussian packet distribution P_n,Ω(T). The authors explicitly state that they cannot systematically find periodic orbits and only 'infer' their properties from chords. This proxy is load-bearing: if actual periodic orbits do not concentrate near nT0 with width sqrt(n)σ0, the predicted peak in the form factor can shift or disappear even though the numerical autocorrelation peak remains. The manuscript should either validate the proxy, for example by a direct search for a sample of short periodic orbits and a comparison of their travel-time distribution with Eq. (18), or clearly state that the agreement with the numerical peak is suggestive but not yet derived.
  2. [Sec. 4.1.1–4.1.2, Eqs. (9)–(10) and text after Eq. (18)] The derivation of K(T) ∝ T P_Ω(T) is internally inconsistent as written. Using Eq. (9) ρ(T) ≈ (1/T)e^{λT} and Eq. (10) A(T) ≈ (1/(πT))e^{-λT/2}, one obtains A^2(T)ρ(T) = (1/π^2 T^3) P_Ω(T), not T P_Ω(T). The stated result T P_Ω(T) follows only if the amplitude A(T) carries an additional factor proportional to T, as in Eq. (8) and in the standard Hannay–Ozorio derivation. This algebraic discrepancy needs to be corrected, since the rest of the argument relies on the functional form of the form factor.
  3. [Sec. 3.2.1 and Table 2] The main-peak position at Ω/Ωk = 0.589 is quoted as Δc = 1.0899ωp in the échelle-diagram analysis (Figs. 10 and 13), whereas Table 2 lists Δc = 1.1132ωp for the same rotation and symmetry class. This unreconciled difference of about 2% is comparable to the claimed agreement between Δc, Δth_c, and Δi, and it affects the validation of Eq. (19). The paper should report a single measurement procedure with associated uncertainties, or explain why two different values are used.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.1.2, text after Eq. (18)] The sentence 'One has to keep in mind that the dependency on Ω is not explicit but hidden in the values of T0 and σ0' leaves it unclear whether T0 and σ0 are measured from ray simulations at each rotation or fitted; the later text indicates they are measured, which is the correct and more convincing approach.
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (A.30)] The label i is used for periodic orbits in the prefactor while j is used in the phase and in the summation; this typographical inconsistency should be corrected for clarity.
  3. [Sec. 4.1.1, Eq. (17)] The transition from the discrete form factor in Eq. (16), valid for short times below the Ehrenfest time, to the long-time form in Eq. (17) with exponential growth and decay would benefit from an explicit statement of the time regime in which the diagonal approximation and the Gaussian packet model are applied.
  4. [Sec. 4.2] The predicted position of secondary peaks at approximately Δc/3 is acknowledged to be a rough estimate at most rotation rates; the authors should make clear that this is a heuristic scaling argument rather than a quantitative prediction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the predicted Δc is a parameter-free ray-model comparison, not a fit to the target frequencies.

full rationale

The central derivation is the semiclassical prediction Δth_c ≈ 2π/T0, where T0 and σ0 are the mean and width of the one-chord acoustic travel-time distribution computed from ray simulations (Eq. 18), while the numerical Δc is independently measured from the frequency autocorrelation of chaotic modes (Sec. 3.2, Fig. 9). The comparison in Fig. 17 and Table 2 is a genuine test: no parameter is fitted to the mode frequencies, and T0 is not defined in terms of Δc. The trace-formula step (Eqs. 7–17) is a standard semiclassical relation re-derived in Appendix A, and the Gaussian packet model for periodic-orbit travel times is an explicitly stated approximation rather than an assumption that already contains the target peak. Equation 19 gives an independent estimate of T0 from the mean acoustic time over the meridional plane, so the predicted peak position does not reduce to the measured autocorrelation peak. The citations to Lignières & Georgeot (2009) and Evano et al. (2019) provide the ray Hamiltonian, mode classification, and the companion observational finding of the peaks, but none of these citations assumes the pseudo-large-separation explanation. Thus no load-bearing step in the derivation reduces to its own input. A numerical inconsistency appears in the quoted Δc at Ω/Ωk = 0.589 (1.0899ωp in Sec. 3.2.1 versus 1.1132ωp in Table 2), but that is a consistency issue, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central predictive formula Delta_c near 2*pi/T0 relies on two measured ray-model parameters (T0, sigma0), a crude Gaussian-packet model for chord travel times, and the assumption that periodic-orbit statistics follow chord statistics. No new physical entities are introduced. The remaining axioms are standard physical approximations for high-frequency p-modes in polytropic models.

free parameters (3)
  • T0 (mean 1-chord acoustic travel time) = 5.19/omega_p at Omega/Omega_k=0.481; 6.30/omega_p at Omega/Omega_k=0.706
    Defines the packet centers nT0 in Eq. 18 and hence the predicted main peak Delta_c near 2*pi/T0. Measured from ray simulations, not from mode frequencies.
  • sigma0 (standard deviation of 1-chord acoustic travel times) = sigma0/T0 = 0.049 at Omega/Omega_k=0.481; 0.097 at Omega/Omega_k=0.809
    Controls the width and height of the predicted autocorrelation peak via Eq. 18. Measured from ray simulations.
  • lmax threshold lc for chaotic/whispering-gallery separation = Numerical value not stated; read from the gap in lmax histograms (Fig. 5)
    Used to automatically remove whispering gallery modes from the chaotic-mode dataset. It is a classification parameter chosen from the data.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Cowling approximation, neglect of Coriolis force, and neglect of buoyancy are valid for high-frequency p-modes.
    Invoked in Sec. 2.1 to reduce the pulsation equations to the Helmholtz-like Eq. 1.
  • domain assumption A uniformly rotating, self-gravitating polytropic model (Gamma=5/3, mu=3) represents the oscillation physics of rapidly rotating massive and intermediate-mass stars.
    Sec. 2.2; all numerical modes are computed in this single model family, so real-star applicability is an assumption.
  • domain assumption Berry-Robnik decomposition: regular and chaotic modes form independent subspectra.
    Sec. 2.1 and Sec. 2.3; used to isolate chaotic modes and to apply random-matrix statistics.
  • ad hoc to paper The periodic-orbit travel-time density can be inferred from n-chord trajectories, modeled as Gaussian packets with means nT0 and widths sqrt(n)*sigma0 (Eq. 18).
    Sec. 4.1.2; the paper explicitly states it has no systematic way to find periodic orbits and uses this crude approximation to build the form factor.
  • standard math Diagonal approximation for the form factor is valid up to the Ehrenfest time for the relevant orbits.
    Sec. 4.1.1; standard quantum-chaos result needed to reduce the double sum in Eq. 15 to K(T) = sum A_j^2 delta(T-T_j).
  • domain assumption Partial barriers around the 2-period island chain trap chaotic trajectories long enough to isolate modes at the computed frequencies.
    Sec. 4.2; used to explain secondary peaks; the paper acknowledges the issue needs deeper analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Regularities in the spectrum of chaotic p-modes in rapidly rotating stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4AW6G6YD

@misc{pith2026190805143,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Regularities in the spectrum of chaotic p-modes in rapidly rotating stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4AW6G6YD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05143}
}
read the original abstract

Interpreting the oscillations of massive and intermediate mass stars remains a challenging task. In fast rotators, the oscillation spectrum of p-modes is a superposition of sub-spectra which correspond to different types of modes, among which island modes and chaotic modes are expected to be the most visible. In the case of island modes, a semi-analytic formula describing the asymptotic behavior of island modes has been obtained previously. We study the properties of high frequency chaotic p-modes in a polytropic model. Unexpected peaks appear in the frequency autocorrelations of the spectra. Our goal is to find a physical interpretation for these peaks and also to provide an overview of the mode properties. We use the 2D oscillation code TOP to produce the modes and acoustic ray simulations to explore the wave properties in the asymptotic regime. Using the tools developed in the field of quantum chaos (or wave chaos), we derive an expression for the frequency autocorrelation involving the travel time of acoustic rays. Chaotic mode spectra were previously thought to be irregular, i. e. described only through their statistical properties. Our analysis shows the existence, in chaotic mode spectra, of a pseudo large separation. This means that chaotic modes are organized in series, such that the modes in each series follow a nearly regular frequency spacing. The pseudo large separation of chaotic modes is very close to the large separation of island modes. Its value is related to the sound speed averaged over the meridional plane of the star. In addition to the pseudo large separation, other correlations appear in the numerically calculated spectra. We explain their origin by the trapping of acoustic rays near the stable islands.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.05143 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. We did not draw the small island structures in the domain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Chaotic zone of the PSS at increasing values of the rotation rate. The chaotic zone grows monotonically, which is not the case for the main island zone. Nj Chebyshev polynomials T j and Nl spherical harmonics Y m l , through the decomposition : Ψ(r, θ, φ) = X Nl l=0   X Nj j=0 a l,m j T j(2r − 1)   , Y m l (θ, φ), (6) where the degrees l are either odd or even integers (Reese et al. 2006). The needed… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. PSS at Ω/Ωk = 0.589 with L˜ z = 0.16/ωp, where θ is the colati￾tude and kθ the projection of the wave vector on the line tangent to the rp(θ) = rs(θ) − z curve. The phase space structures are similar to those presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Four odd axisymmetric modes at rotation Ω/Ωk = 0.589 : (a) chaotic mode, (b) whispering gallery mode, (c) 2-period island mode (` = 0), with a black line indicating the central periodic orbit, and (d) 6- period island mode. The figure shows the scaled pressure amplitud…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Three modes at Ω/Ωk = 0.589 belonging to series 1. From left to right, we see a chaotic mode, an interface mode and an island mode with ` = 4. The thick white line is the main island central orbit. The modes intensity |Ψ| 2 is represented, where Ψ is the scaled pressur…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left : nearest neighbors spacing distribution P( ˜s), with 1344 fre￾quency levels obtained from eight independent spectra : Ω/Ωk = 0.481 (206 odd levels), Ω/Ωk = 0.545 (223 odd levels, 105 even levels), Ω/Ωk = 0.589 (217 odd levels, 96 even levels), Ω/Ωk = 0.658 (207 o…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Autocorrelations R2(ξ), where ξ is a displacement in frequency, of chaotic spectra with odd parity : a) 206 levels from 28.35 ωp to 46.89 ωp, b) 223 levels from 28.15 ωp to 44.09 ωp, c) 217 levels from 26.02 ωp to 40.29 ωp, d) 283 levels from 23.57 ωp to 36.22 ωp and e…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: ). The frequency spacing between two consecutive modes is the so-called large separation and their amplitude distributions only differs by the number of nodes along a particular direction (radial for modes in a non rotating star and along the central periodic orbit fo…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Échelle diagram of chaotic modes at Ω/Ωk = 0.589 in the range 25.60ωp to 33.54ωp, with odd parity. Comparing the amplitude patterns of the chaotic modes that belong to the same track on the échelle diagram, we find out that consecutive modes are often very similar. Th…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Mode intensity |Ψ| 2 at Ω/Ωk = 0.589, where Ψ is the scaled pressure amplitude, showing the similarity between consecutive modes. Top : two consecutive modes that belong to series 8. Bottom : two con￾secutive modes that belong to series 3. 0 c    c      [P…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Top panel : Autocorrelation at Ω/ωk = 0.589 for quantum num￾ber m = 1, in the frequency domain 30.51ωp to 38.48ωp. Bottom panel : Autocorrelation at Ω/ωk = 0.589 for quantum number m = 4, in the frequency domain 30.53ωp to 38.51ωp. In both cases, the dashed line is th…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Comparison of the "stellar" autocorrelation R2(ξ) at Ω/Ωk = 0.589, represented in solid line, with the GOE autocorrelation repre￾sented by a dashed line. To compare the "stellar" and GOE autocorre￾lations, two changes have been made. First, the autocorrelation of our …
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Left panels : Number of n-chord trajectories, with n = 1, ..., 20, vs their travel time T at rotations Ω/Ωk = 0.481 (top) and Ω/Ωk = 0.809 (bottom), with 300 bins for the total distribution. The n-chord samples contain ∼ 4200 chords each. Right panel : the Ω/Ωk = 0.48…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Upper panel : Theoretical large separation ∆ th c /ωp (upward tri￾angles) compared to the numerical peak’s position (downward triangles) calculated for axisymmetric modes at six rotation rates. Middle panel : theoretical autocorrelations with quantum number m = 0, fro…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Snapshot of the evolution of a bundle of trajectories as they in￾tersect the PSS, represented by black dots, at Ω/Ωk = 0.706. The phase space zones where black dots are dense correspond to regions enclosed by partial barriers. The trajectories are initially in the nei…
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Intersection of a few tori with the PSS at Ω/Ωk = 0. Only the part of the PSS where kθ > 0 is shown because of the symmetry with respect to the kθ = 0 axis at zero rotation. The tori correspond to modes of degree `s = 1, `s = 9 or `s = 11. dominated by three main stru…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aerts, C., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., & Kurtz, D. W. 2010, Asteroseismology, Astronomy & Astrophysics Library (Springer Netherlands)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Ballot, J., Lignières, F., & Reese, D. R. 2013, Numerical Exploration of Oscilla- tion Modes in Rapidly Rotating Stars, ed. M. Goupil, K. Belkacem, C. Neiner, F. Lignières, & J. J. Green, V ol. 865, 91

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Berry, M. V . 1985, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 400, 229

    work page 1985

  4. [4]

    Berry, M. V . & Robnik, M. 1984, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Gen- eral, 17, 2413

    work page 1984

  5. [5]

    & Hugues, E

    Bogomolny, E. & Hugues, E. 1998, Physical Review E, 57, 5404

    work page 1998

  6. [6]

    B., Georgeot, B., Giannoni, M.-J., & Schmit, C

    Bogomolny, E. B., Georgeot, B., Giannoni, M.-J., & Schmit, C. 1992, Physical Review Letters, 69, 1477

    work page 1992

  7. [7]

    B., Georgeot, B., Giannoni, M.-J., & Schmit, C

    Bogomolny, E. B., Georgeot, B., Giannoni, M.-J., & Schmit, C. 1997, Physics Reports, 291, 219

    work page 1997

  8. [8]

    Bogomolny, E. B. & Keating, J. P. 1996, Physical Review Letters, 77, 1472

    work page 1996

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    1991, Random matrix theories and chaotic dynamics, M.-J

    Bohigas, O. 1991, Random matrix theories and chaotic dynamics, M.-J. Gian- noni, A. V oros, and J. Zinn-Justin, Proceedings of the Les Houches Summer School of Theoretical Physics, LII (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 87–199

    1991

  2. [10]

    1993, Physics Reports, 223, 43

    Bohigas, O., Tomsovic, S., & Ullmo, D. 1993, Physics Reports, 223, 43

    1993

  3. [11]

    Bowman, D. M. & Kurtz, D. W. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom- ical Society, 476, 3169

    2018

  4. [12]

    & Shi, K.-J

    Chang, S.-J. & Shi, K.-J. 1986, Physical Review A, 34, 7

    1986

  5. [13]

    1977, Mecanique quantique (293 rue Lecourbe, 75015 Paris: Hermann)

    Cohen-Tannoudji, C., Diu, B., & Laloe, F. 1977, Mecanique quantique (293 rue Lecourbe, 75015 Paris: Hermann)

    1977

  6. [14]

    2017, Chaos: Classical and Quantum (http://chaosbook.org/)

    Cvitanovic, P., Artuso, R., Mainieri, R., Tanner, G., & Vattay, G. 2017, Chaos: Classical and Quantum (http://chaosbook.org/)

    2017

  7. [15]

    2019, EPL, 125, 49002 García Hernández, A., Martín-Ruiz, S., Monteiro, M

    Evano, B., Georgeot, B., & Lignières, F. 2019, EPL, 125, 49002 García Hernández, A., Martín-Ruiz, S., Monteiro, M. J. P. F. G., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 811, L29 García Hernández, A., Moya, A., Michel, E., et al. 2009, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 506, 79...

    2019

  8. [16]

    1993, Linear adiabatic stellar pulsation, J-P

    Gough, D. 1993, Linear adiabatic stellar pulsation, J-P. Zahn and J. Zinn-Justin, Proceedings of the Les Houches Summer School of Theoretical Physics, XLVII (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 400–560

    1993

  9. [17]

    Gutzwiller, M. C. 1990, Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics, Interdisci- plinary Applied Mathematics (New York: Springer-Verlag)

    1990

  10. [18]

    Hannay, J. H. & Ozorio De Almeida, A. M. 1984, Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and General, 17, 3429

    1984

  11. [19]

    J., Kawaler, S

    Hansen, C. J., Kawaler, S. D., & Trimble, V . 2004, Stellar Interiors: Physical

    2004

  12. [20]

    1994, Physical Review E, 49, R11 Lignières, F

    Kudrolli, A., Sridhar, S., Pandey, A., & Ramaswamy, R. 1994, Physical Review E, 49, R11 Lignières, F. & Georgeot, B. 2008, Physical Review E, 78, 016215 Lignières, F. & Georgeot, B. 2009, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 500, 1173 Lignières, F., Rieutord, M., & Reese, D. 2006, Astron...

    1994

  13. [21]

    2004, Random Matrices (Elsevier) Article number, page 18 of 18 Benjamin Evano et al.: Regularities in the spectrum of chaotic p-modes in rapidly rotating stars

    Mehta, M. 2004, Random Matrices (Elsevier) Article number, page 18 of 18 Benjamin Evano et al.: Regularities in the spectrum of chaotic p-modes in rapidly rotating stars

    2004

  14. [22]

    2017, in European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, V ol

    Michel, E., Dupret, M.-A., Reese, D., et al. 2017, in European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, V ol. 160, 03001

    2017

  15. [23]

    M., Angelou, G

    Mirouh, G. M., Angelou, G. C., Reese, D. R., & Costa, G. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 483, L28

    2019

  16. [24]

    1993, Chaos in Dynamical Systems (Cambridge University Press)

    Ott, E. 1993, Chaos in Dynamical Systems (Cambridge University Press)

    1993

  17. [25]

    Ouazzani, R.-M., Dupret, M.-A., & Reese, D. R. 2012, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 547, A75

    2012

  18. [26]

    W., & Dupret, M.-A

    Ouazzani, R.-M., Roxburgh, I. W., & Dupret, M.-A. 2015, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 579, A116 O’Connor, P., Gehlen, J., & Heller, E. J. 1987, Physical Review Letters, 58, 1296 Paparó, M., Benkö, J. M., Hareter, M., & Guzik, J. A. 2016, Astrophysical Jour- nal Supplement Series...

    2015

  19. [27]

    Pasek, M., Georgeot, B., Lignières, F., & Reese, D. R. 2011, Physical Review Letters, 107, 121101

    2011

  20. [28]

    Pasek, M., Lignières, F., Georgeot, B., & Reese, D. R. 2012, Astronomy & As- trophysics, 546, A11

    2012

  21. [29]

    2006, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 455, 621

    Reese, D., Lignières, F., & Rieutord, M. 2006, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 455, 621

    2006

  22. [30]

    2008, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 481, 449

    Reese, D., Lignières, F., & Rieutord, M. 2008, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 481, 449

    2008

  23. [31]

    R., Lignières, F., Ballot, J., et al

    Reese, D. R., Lignières, F., Ballot, J., et al. 2017, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 601, A130

    2017

  24. [32]

    R., MacGregor, K

    Reese, D. R., MacGregor, K. B., Jackson, S., Skumanich, A., & Metcalfe, T. S. 2009, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 506, 189

    2009

  25. [33]

    R., Prat, V ., Barban, C., Veer-Menneret, C

    Reese, D. R., Prat, V ., Barban, C., Veer-Menneret, C. v., & MacGregor, K. B. 2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 550, A77

    2013

  26. [34]

    Schulman, L. S. 1996, Techniques and Applications of Path Integration (Wiley Classics Library)

    1996

  27. [35]

    2011, Physical Review E, 84, 035202

    Shim, J.-B., Wiersig, J., & Cao, H. 2011, Physical Review E, 84, 035202

    2011

  28. [36]

    & Richter, K

    Sieber, M. & Richter, K. 2001, Physica Scripta, 2001, 128

    2001

  29. [37]

    2007, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 40, 13883 Article number, page 19 of 18

    Vidmar, G., Stöckmann, H.-J., Robnik, M., et al. 2007, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 40, 13883 Article number, page 19 of 18

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.