Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 49 references

High-Performance Green and Blue Light-Emitting Diodes Enabled by CdZnSe/ZnS Core/Shell Colloidal Quantum Wells

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports that CdZnSe/ZnS core/shell colloidal quantum wells, made by direct Cd-to-Zn cation exchange and hot-injection shell growth, produce green and blue LEDs with record peak external quantum efficiencies of 20.4% and 10.6%…

desk verdict Genuine experimental advance in green/blue CQW-LEDs with record EQE, but the headline lifetimes are extrapolated from short tests and need error bars before being quoted. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18925 v1 pith:4CQT3N5V submitted 2024-11-28 physics.optics

Yunke Zhu , Xiuyuan Lu , Jingjing Qiu , Peng Bai , An Hu , Yige Yao , Qinyun Liu , Yang Li
show 12 more authors
Wenjin Yu Yaolong Li Wangxiao Jin Xitong Zhu Yunzhou Deng Zhetong Liu Peng Gao XiaoFei Zhao Youqin Zhu Li Zhou Yizheng Jin Yunan Gao
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords colloidalquantumwellscationexchangeCdZnSe/ZnScore/shellgreenandblueLEDsexternalefficiencynanoplateletshot-injectionshellgrowthdisplaycolorgamut
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that green and blue colloidal-quantum-well LEDs can finally compete with their red counterparts if the emitter cores are made as homogeneous CdZnSe alloys by direct cadmium-to-zinc cation exchange and then capped with a ZnS shell by hot injection. It reports record peak external quantum efficiencies of 20.4% for green and 10.6% for blue, maximum luminances of 347,683 cd/m² and 38,063 cd/m², and T50@100 lifetimes of roughly 14,000 h and 195 h. Previous green and blue CQW-LEDs typically stayed below 10% EQE with lifetimes under an hour, so these numbers are the first to put the full CQW family in reach of display applications. The paper also shows the emission wavelength can be dialed from 465 nm to 540 nm by exchange time and shell growth, with linewidths of 18–24 nm.

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is direct cation exchange governed by hard-soft acid-base selectivity: tributylphosphine solvates the softer Cd²⁺ ions while zinc halides supply Zn²⁺, and oleylamine keeps the nanoplatelet surface stable, so the exchange proceeds inside the thin crystal without destroying its sheet-like morphology. At the ~240 °C reaction temperature, Frenkel pairs (cation vacancies paired with self-interstitials) form readily, letting the exchange run through the full thickness and produce homogeneous Cd1−xZnxSe alloy cores rather than surface-only substitution; the paper supports this assignment with an effective-mass bandgap calculation that tracks the high-temperature data. The second half of the machinery is hot-injection shell growth, where 305 °C decomposes 1-octanethiol to release sulfur and grow a ZnS shell that confines excitons, suppresses trap channels, and shifts emission only moderately. Together these two steps give continuous composition tuning, high PLQY, and the anisotropic emission profile needed for efficient green and blue devices.

What would settle it

An element-resolved STEM-EDS line scan across individual exchanged CQWs would settle the central claim: a flat Zn profile through the thickness supports homogeneous alloying, while Zn concentrated at the surfaces or edges would indicate a graded or phase-separated core and require rewriting the synthesis-mechanism section.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a synthesis route that preserves the two-dimensional character of thin colloidal quantum wells while changing their chemistry: 4.5-monolayer CdSe nanoplatelets are converted by direct Cd-to-Zn cation exchange using tributylphosphine as a soft base to extract Cd and zinc halides to insert Zn, yielding alloyed Cd1−xZnxSe cores whose Zn fraction rises from about 53% to 82% with exchange time. Hot-injection growth of a ZnS shell at 305 °C then passivates the core, raises the photoluminescence quantum yield, lengthens PL decay, and shifts emission to green (524 nm) and blue (474 nm) with narrow FWHM, while the particles keep their anisotropic transition-dipole distribution. Built into a standard ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PVK/CQW/ZnMgO/Ag stack, these emitters give the record efficiency, luminance, and lifetime figures, with a Lambertian profile and stable CIE coordinates. In short, the paper's claim is that direct cation exchange plus a wide-gap ZnS shell removes the two historical barriers—excessive shell-induced redshift and trap-mediated losses—that kept green and blue CQW-LEDs inefficient.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that direct Cd-to-Zn exchange yields homogeneous CdZnSe alloy cores rather than zinc-rich surface layers or separated phases, since the composition-tuning and bandgap claims depend on that homogeneity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Green and blue CQW-LEDs move from sub-10% EQE and sub-hour lifetimes to about 20% and 10% EQE with T50@100 of roughly 14,000 h and 195 h, making the full red-green-blue CQW family display-relevant.
  • Exchange time and shell thickness provide a continuous wavelength dial from 465 to 540 nm with FWHM of 18–24 nm, covering the green and blue display primaries.
  • Because the devices keep a Lambertian emission profile and, together with red CQW-LEDs, cover 151% of sRGB and over 82% of Rec.2020, the three-color CQW gamut is now wide enough for high-end displays.
  • The direct exchange route avoids the copper residues left by indirect cation exchange, so the alloy cores are cleaner and the subsequent ZnS shell can passivate rather than fight internal defects.
  • Blue lifetime remains the weakest point: 195 h at 100 cd/m² is far below quantum-dot LED values, so blue stability is the next bottleneck even after this efficiency gain.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • I infer the same direct-exchange-plus-shell sequence should transfer to other thin II-VI nanoplatelets, since the mechanism needs only a softer lattice cation and a matching soft-base ligand; testing it on CdS or CdTe cores would broaden the palette beyond green and blue.
  • I infer the measured transition-dipole anisotropy (~77% green, ~76% blue) means oriented or patterned emissive layers could push EQE higher through better outcoupling, an optimization the paper does not attempt.
  • I infer the near-monotonic exchange-time-to-Zn-content relation could serve as a calibration curve for bandgap engineering, and pushing exchange beyond ~82% Zn would test whether low-cadmium or cadmium-free CQWs can keep the same narrow emission and stability.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a synthesis route for CdZnSe alloy cores via direct Cd-to-Zn cation exchange in thin CdSe colloidal quantum wells, followed by hot-injection ZnS shell growth. The resulting CdZnSe/ZnS core/shell CQWs are used to fabricate green and blue LEDs, with claimed peak EQEs of 20.4% (green) and 10.6% (blue) in the abstract (20.6% and 10.4% in the body), maximum luminances of 347,683 cd/m2 (green) and 38,063 cd/m2 (blue), and extrapolated T50@100 lifetimes of about 14,000 h (green) and 195 h (blue). The authors claim that these devices surpass previously reported solution-processed CQW-LEDs in both efficiency and operational stability.

Significance. If the reported metrics and the synthesis mechanism hold, this is a substantial advance: it provides a direct cation-exchange route to thin alloyed CQWs, extends the spectral coverage of CQW-LEDs into the green and blue, and demonstrates EQEs exceeding 20% and 10% with high brightness, along with an extended color gamut (151% sRGB). The directly measured device histograms over 20 devices with low relative standard deviation and the spectral stability with voltage are commendable and support the efficiency claims. The paper's broader significance, however, depends on the operational-lifetime extrapolation and on the benchmark comparison being fully documented; as submitted, the lifetime claim rests on an unvalidated power-law fit and the comparison table is not present in the manuscript.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2 (Device fabrication and performance), Figure 5] The headline T50@100 values of ~14,000 h (green) and ~195 h (blue) are extrapolated from short tests at high initial luminance (28 min at 51,990 cd/m2 for green; 17 min at 4,670 cd/m2 for blue) via the empirical law (L0)^n T = constant, with the Figure 5 caption inconsistently writing T95 instead of T50. The fitted acceleration factor n is reported without uncertainty, and no intermediate- or low-luminance control is shown to validate the power law. Since the extrapolation spans a factor of ~520 in L0 for the green device, the uncertainty in n propagates exponentially: for n around 1.7, a ±0.1 change in n alters the extrapolated green T50@100 by roughly a factor of 1.9, and n values between ~1.3 and ~2.1 span nearly two orders of magnitude. Because the 'orders of magnitude' improvement claim in Section 3 depends on these extrapolated lifetimes, please provide the uncertainty on n, correct the T95/T50 notation, and either validate the acceleration law with at least one lower-L0 measurement or explicitly relabel the lifetimes as extrapolations with appropriate confidence intervals.
  2. [Abstract vs. Section 2 and Figure 4] The abstract reports peak EQE values of 20.4% (green) and 10.6% (blue), whereas the body text in Section 2 (Device fabrication and performance) and Figure 4b report 20.6% and 10.4%. The manuscript should reconcile these values and state which corresponds to the champion device; the device histograms in Figure 4c should be tied to the same batch.
  3. [Section 2 (Synthesis of CdZnSe core CQWs), Figure 2] The conclusion that direct Cd-to-Zn exchange yields homogeneous Cd1-xZnxSe alloy cores, as opposed to Zn-rich surface layers or core/shell heterostructures, is inferred from uniform HAADF-STEM contrast and from an effective-mass bandgap calculation that matches high-temperature reactions. No element-resolved compositional mapping (e.g., STEM-EDS line scan) is provided. Since the title and composition-tuning mechanism rely on the alloyed-core structure, please supply direct compositional evidence or explicitly qualify the structural assignment.
  4. [Section 1, Section 2, Section 3 (Table S2)] All benchmark comparisons supporting the 'superior performance' and 'record' claims are located in Table S2, which is not present in the submitted manuscript. Because these comparisons are load-bearing for the paper's central claim, please include the table in the main text or in the available supporting information, or report the relevant prior-art values directly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 1c caption] 'HADDF-STEM' should be 'HAADF-STEM'.
  2. [Section 2 (Synthesis of CdZnSe core CQWs)] The text refers to 'HASB theory'; the standard abbreviation is 'HSAB' (hard and soft acids and bases).
  3. [Section 2 (Synthesis of CdZnSe core CQWs)] There are several typographical errors, including 'varrying' for 'varying' and 'hightemperature' for 'high temperature'; please proofread the text.
  4. [Figure 2c] The effective-mass approximation calculation is not described; please provide the band parameters and confinement model used, and add error bars or uncertainty ranges to the ICP-OES composition data.
  5. [Section 2 (Device fabrication and performance)] The statement that the EL spectrum 'hardly changed until the voltage rises to 9 V' would benefit from a quantitative measure, such as the peak wavelength or FWHM as a function of voltage, rather than relying on the representative spectra in Figure 4e.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: device EQE and luminance are measured, the alloy inference is a consistency check, and lifetime extrapolation is an empirical fit rather than a definitionally forced prediction.

full rationale

The central claims are direct measured device metrics: peak EQE (20.6%/10.4%), maximum luminance, EL spectra, and PLQY values are experimentally reported, not derived from a fitted parameter. The alloy-core interpretation is supported by XRD shifts, ICP-OES composition data, and an effective-mass bandgap calculation used as a consistency check against high-temperature reaction results; it is not defined in terms of the conclusion it supports. The T50@100 lifetime values are extrapolated from short high-luminance tests using the empirical relation (L0)^n T95 = constant, with the acceleration factor n fitted from device data. This is a legitimate accelerated-lifetime extrapolation, and while it is statistically fragile (no uncertainty on n, T95/T50 notation mismatch, no intermediate validation), it is not circular: the fitted n is not the predicted lifetime, and T50@100 is not equal to the input by construction. The only self-citation, reference [3] used for color-gamut comparison, is incidental and not load-bearing for the synthesis, material characterization, or efficiency claims. No derivation chain in the paper reduces to its own inputs, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no invented entities. The main free parameter is the empirically fitted lifetime acceleration factor n. The axioms are standard domain models used to interpret the synthesis and device physics; none is obviously ad hoc, but they are assumptions from the literature rather than proven within this manuscript.

free parameters (1)
  • Lifetime acceleration factor n = Not reported (fitted to L0 vs T50 data)
    Used to extrapolate T50 at 100 cd/m2 from high-luminance decay measurements via (L0)^n T95 = constant; no uncertainty given.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Hard-soft acid-base (HSAB) theory governs cation exchange selectivity and ligand binding.
    Used in Section 2 to justify TBP solubilizing Cd2+ and zinc halides releasing Zn2+; if incorrect, the proposed direct CE mechanism fails.
  • domain assumption Frenkel pair formation enables internal cation exchange at about 240 degrees Celsius in thin CQWs.
    In Section 2 the authors invoke temperature-dependent Frenkel pair formation to explain alloy formation versus surface-only exchange; this is a literature-based model, not directly verified here.
  • domain assumption Effective mass approximation accurately describes the composition-dependent bandgap of alloy CdZnSe CQWs.
    Used in Figure 2c to substantiate alloy formation; if the model is not accurate for strongly confined 4.5 ML CQWs, the alloy inference is weakened.
  • domain assumption Type-I CdZnSe/ZnS heterostructure with a wide-gap ZnS shell passivates defects and confines excitons.
    Assumed in the shell growth section to explain enhanced PLQY and red-shift; central to the emissive properties but not directly proven beyond lifetime and PLQY trends.
  • domain assumption Empirical lifetime power law (L0)^n T95 = constant holds for these devices.
    Used in Figure 5 to convert measured T50 at high luminance to T50@100 cd/m2; the exponent n is fitted, and extrapolation validity is assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-Performance Green and Blue Light-Emitting Diodes Enabled by CdZnSe/ZnS Core/Shell Colloidal Quantum Wells." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4CQT3N5V

@misc{pith2026241118925,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-Performance Green and Blue Light-Emitting Diodes Enabled by CdZnSe/ZnS Core/Shell Colloidal Quantum Wells},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4CQT3N5V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18925}
}
read the original abstract

The unique anisotropic properties of colloidal quantum wells (CQWs) make them highly promising as components in nanocrystal-based devices. However, the limited performance of green and blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs) based on CQWs has impeded their practical applications. In this study, we tailored alloy CdZnSe core CQWs with precise compositions via direct cation exchange (CE) from CdSe CQWs with specific size, shape, and crystal structure and utilized hot-injection shell (HIS) growth to synthesize CdZnSe/ZnS core/shell CQWs exhibiting exceptional optoelectronic characteristics. This approach enabled us to successfully fabricate green and blue LEDs manifesting superior performance compared to previously reported solution-processed CQW-LEDs. Our devices demonstrated a remarkable peak external quantum efficiency (20.4% for green and 10.6% for blue), accompanied by a maximum brightness 347,683 cd m-2 for green and 38,063 cd m-2 for blue. The high-performance represents a significant advancement for nanocrystal-based light-emitting diodes (Nc-LEDs) incorporating anisotropic nanocrystals. This work provides a comprehensive synthesis strategy for enhancing the efficiency of Nc-LEDs utilizing anisotropic nanocrystals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18925 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a) A schematic of the synthesis pathway from CdSe to CdZnSe CQWs. (b) Solutions of CQWs after different CE reaction times (10 min to 60 min) under 365 nm UV light. (c) HADDF-STEM images of CQWs after CE reaction with 40 min. The inset shows the high￾resolution image of the CQW (scale bar, 5 nm). (d) Normalized absorption and PL spectra of CdZnSe CQWs with respect to the CE reaction time. (e) Size distribution histog… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a) Schematic illustrations of the synthesis of CdZnSe/ZnS core/shell CQWs (upper panel). TEM images of green and blue CQWs (lower panel), (scale bar, 100 nm). Insets, corresponding size distribution histogram. b) Absorption and photoluminescence spectra of CQWs solution. Insets show photographs of the sample of core/shell CQWs under UV light. b) TEM images of green (above) and blue (below) CdZnSe/ZnS core/shell CQWs… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Luminance as a function of operational time for green (a) and blue (b) CQW-LED. Device lifetime is evaluated by measuring luminance over time at constant current density. The lifetimes (T50) at various initial luminance (L0) values are shown in the insets. The acceleration factors (n) are fitted according to the empirical relationship of (L0) n T95 = constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kelestemur, Y

    Y. Kelestemur, Y. Shynkarenko, M. Anni, S. Yakunin, M. L. De Giorgi, M. V. Kovalenko, ACS Nano 2019, 13, 13899

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    B. Liu, Y. Altintas, L. Wang, S. Shendre, M. Sharma, H. Sun, E. Mutlugun, H. V. Demir, Adv Mater 2020, 32, e1905824

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Y. Zhu, Y. Deng, P. Bai, X. Wu, Y. Yao, Q. Liu, J. Qiu, A. Hu, Z. Tang, W. Yu, Y. Li, P. Jiang, Z. Liu, P. Gao, Y. Hao, W. Jin, D. Chen, X. Zhu, Y. Jin, Y. Gao, Advanced Materials 2023, 2305382

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Delikanli, F

    S. Delikanli, F. Isik, F. Shabani, H. D. Baruj, N. Taghipour, H. V. Demir, Adv. Optical Mater. 2021, 9, 2002220

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Z. Wen, P. Liu, J. Ma, S. Jia, X. Xiao, S. Ding, H. Tang, H. Yang, C. Zhang, X. Qu, B. Xu, K. Wang, K. L. Teo, X. W. Sun, Advanced Electronic Materials 2021, 7, DOI 10.1002/aelm.202000965

    work page doi:10.1002/aelm.202000965 2021

  6. [6]

    Shabani, H

    F. Shabani, H. Dehghanpour Baruj, I. Yurdakul, S. Delikanli, N. Gheshlaghi, F. Isik, B. Liu, Y. Altintas, B. Canımkurbey, H. V. Demir, Small 2022, 18, 2106115

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    A. Hu, P. Bai, Y. Zhu, Z. Tang, L. Xiao, Y. Gao, Small 2022, 2204120

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    R. Duan, Z. Zhang, L. Xiao, X. Zhao, Y. T. Thung, L. Ding, Z. Liu, J. Yang, V. D. Ta, H. Sun, Adv Mater 2022, e2108884. 7

    work page 2022

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    P. Bai, A. Hu, Y. Deng, Z. Tang, W. Yu, Y. Hao, S. Yang, Y. Zhu, L. Xiao, Y. Jin, Y. Gao, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 9051

    2022

  2. [10]

    S. Hu, F. Shabani, B. Liu, L. Zhang, M. Guo, G. Lu, Z. Zhou, J. Wang, J. C. Huang, Y. Min, Q. Xue, H. V. Demir, C. Liu, ACS Nano 2022, 16, 10840

    2022

  3. [11]

    B. T. Diroll, B. Guzelturk, H. Po, C. Dabard, N. Fu, L. Makke, E. Lhuillier, S. Ithurria, Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 3543

    2023

  4. [12]

    E. Jang, H. Jang, Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 4663

    2023

  5. [13]

    H. D. Baruj, I. Bozkaya, B. Canimkurbey, A. T. Isik, F. Shabani, S. Delikanli, S. Shendre, O. Erdem, F. Isik, H. V. Demir, Small 2023, 2206582

    2023

  6. [14]

    Zhang, Y

    Q. Zhang, Y. Zhu, P. Niu, C. Lao, Y. Yao, W. Liu, Q.-F. Yang, S. Chu, Y. Gao, ACS Photonics 2023, 10, 1397

    2023

  7. [15]

    İzmir, A

    M. İzmir, A. Sharma, S. Shendre, E. G. Durmusoglu, V. K. Sharma, F. Shabani, H. D. Baruj, S. Delikanli, M. Sharma, H. V. Demir, ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 1367

    2022

  8. [16]

    Zhang, S

    F. Zhang, S. Wang, L. Wang, Q. Lin, H. Shen, W. Cao, C. Yang, H. Wang, L. Yu, Z. Du, J. Xue, L. S. Li, Nanoscale 2016, 8, 12182

    2016

  9. [17]

    Altintas, U

    Y. Altintas, U. Quliyeva, K. Gungor, O. Erdem, Y. Kelestemur, E. Mutlugun, M. V. Kovalenko, H. V. Demir, Small 2019, 15, e1804854

    2019

  10. [18]

    Polovitsyn, Z

    A. Polovitsyn, Z. Dang, J. L. Movilla, B. Martín-García, A. H. Khan, G. H. V. Bertrand, R. Brescia, I. Moreels, Chemistry of Materials 2017, 29, 5671

    2017

  11. [19]

    Altintas, K

    Y. Altintas, K. Gungor, Y. Gao, M. Sak, U. Quliyeva, G. Bappi, E. Mutlugun, E. H. Sargent, H. V. Demir, ACS Nano 2019, 13, 10662

    2019

  12. [20]

    A. A. Rossinelli, H. Rojo, A. S. Mule, M. Aellen, A. Cocina, E. De Leo, R. Schäublin, D. J. Norris, Chemistry of Materials 2019, 31, 9567

    2019

  13. [21]

    A. Hu, P. Bai, Y. Zhu, Z. Song, R. Wang, J. Zheng, Y. Yao, Q. Zhang, Z. Ding, P. Gao, X. Sui, X. Liu, Y. Gao, Advanced Optical Materials 2022, DOI 10.1002/adom.202200469

    2022 doi

  14. [23]

    Ithurria, D

    S. Ithurria, D. V. Talapin, Journal of the American Chemical Society 2012, 134, 18585

    2012

  15. [24]

    M. D. Tessier, B. Mahler, B. Nadal, H. Heuclin, S. Pedetti, B. Dubertret, Nano Letters 2013, 13, 3321

    2013

  16. [25]

    H. Lee, H. Yang, P. H. Holloway, Journal of Luminescence 2007, 126, 314

    2007

  17. [26]

    F. Fan, P. Kanjanaboos, M. Saravanapavanantham, E. Beauregard, G. Ingram, E. Yassitepe, M. M. Adachi, O. Voznyy, A. K. Johnston, G. Walters, G.-H. Kim, Z.-H. Lu, E. H. Sargent, Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 4611

    2015

  18. [27]

    J. M. Pietryga, Y. S. Park, J. Lim, A. F. Fidler, W. K. Bae, S. Brovelli, V. I. Klimov, Chem Rev 2016, 116, 10513

    2016

  19. [28]

    Sandrine Ithurria and Benoit Dubertret*, J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2008

    2008

  20. [29]

    Ithurria, G

    S. Ithurria, G. Bousquet, B. Dubertret, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3070

    2011

  21. [30]

    Z. Li, X. Peng, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6578

    2011

  22. [31]

    Nasilowski, B

    M. Nasilowski, B. Mahler, E. Lhuillier, S. Ithurria, B. Dubertret, Chemical Reviews 2016, 116, 10934

    2016

  23. [32]

    Bouet, D

    C. Bouet, D. Laufer, B. Mahler, B. Nadal, H. Heuclin, S. Pedetti, G. Patriarche, B. Dubertret, Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 3002

    2014

  24. [33]

    Lee, D.-E

    S. Lee, D.-E. Yoon, D. Kim, D. J. Shin, B. G. Jeong, D. Lee, J. Lim, W. K. Bae, H.-K. Lim, D. C. Lee, Nanoscale 2019, 11, 15072

    2019

  25. [34]

    D.-E. Yoon, S. Yeo, H. Lee, H. Cho, N. Wang, G.-M. Kim, W. K. Bae, Y. K. Lee, Y.-S. Park, D. C. Lee, Chem. Mater. 2022, acs.chemmater.2c02164

    2022

  26. [35]

    H. Li, M. Zanella, A. Genovese, M. Povia, A. Falqui, C. Giannini, L. Manna, Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 4964

    2011

  27. [36]

    D. H. Son, S. M. Hughes, Y. Yin, A. Paul Alivisatos, Science 2004, 306, 1009

    2004

  28. [37]

    J. Gui, M. Ji, J. Liu, M. Xu, J. Zhang, H. Zhu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 3683. 8

    2015

  29. [38]

    De Trizio, L

    L. De Trizio, L. Manna, Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 10852

    2016

  30. [39]

    R. G. Parr, R. G. Pearson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7512

    1983

  31. [40]

    C. Pu, X. Peng, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 8134

    2016

  32. [41]

    A. A. Rossinelli, A. Riedinger, P. Marqués-Gallego, P. N. Knüsel, F. V. Antolinez, D. J. Norris, Chemical Communications 2017, 53, 9938

    2017

  33. [42]

    Huang, Z

    L. Huang, Z. Ye, L. Yang, J. Li, H. Qin, X. Peng, Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 1799

    2021

  34. [43]

    Y. Yao, X. Bao, Y. Zhu, X. Sui, A. Hu, P. Bai, S. Wang, H. Yang, X. Liu, Y. Gao, Nano Res. 2023, 16, 10420

    2023

  35. [44]

    P. D. Cunningham, I. Coropceanu, K. Mulloy, W. Cho, D. V. Talapin, ACS Nano 2020, 14, 3847

    2020

  36. [45]

    Gupta, S

    S. Gupta, S. V. Kershaw, A. L. Rogach, Advanced Materials 2013, 25, 6923

    2013

  37. [46]

    Groeneveld, L

    E. Groeneveld, L. Witteman, M. Lefferts, X. Ke, S. Bals, G. Van Tendeloo, C. De Mello Donega, ACS Nano 2013, 7, 7913

    2013

  38. [47]

    K. K. Nanda, F. E. Kruis, H. Fissan, S. N. Behera, Journal of Applied Physics 2004, 95, 5035

    2004

  39. [48]

    O. Chen, J. Zhao, V. P. Chauhan, J. Cui, C. Wong, D. K. Harris, H. Wei, H. S. Han, D. Fukumura, R. K. Jain, M. G. Bawendi, Nat Mater 2013, 12, 445

    2013

  40. [49]

    Mahler, B

    B. Mahler, B. Nadal, C. Bouet, G. Patriarche, B. Dubertret, Journal of the American Chemical Society 2012, 134, 18591

    2012

  41. [50]

    P. Bai, A. Hu, Y. Liu, Y. Jin, Y. Gao, J Phys Chem Lett 2020, 11, 4524. 9 Figure 1. a) A schematic of the synthesis pathway from CdSe to CdZnSe CQWs. (b) Solutions of CQWs after different CE reaction times (10 min to 60 min) under 365 nm UV light. ( c) HADDF-STEM images of CQW...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.