Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 99 references

A Sustainable Circular Framework for Financing Infrastructure Climate Adaptation: Integrated Carbon Markets

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes an "integrated carbon market"—a mandatory carbon tax on high-emission infrastructure sectors combined with a voluntary carbon-trading market for individuals and infrastructure operators—as a way to generate sustained…

desk verdict Conceptually coherent proposal for financing infrastructure adaptation via integrated carbon markets, but the revenue loop that sustains it is asserted rather than demonstrated and likely needs a stability mechanism as emissions fall. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.08004 v2 pith:4DI6PKJ6 submitted 2025-01-14 econ.GN cs.CEq-fin.EC

Chao Li , Xing Su , Chao Fan , Jun Wang , Xiangyu Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification econ.GNcs.CEq-fin.EC
keywords infrastructureclimateadaptationfinanceintegratedcarbonmarketstaxvoluntarymarketpersonaltradingcircularframeworkhuman-infrastructure-climatenexus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the chronic shortage of money for adapting infrastructure to climate change is a market-design problem: adaptation projects are unprofitable because their benefits are long-term, uncertain, and hard to attribute, so private capital stays away. It proposes an "integrated carbon market" that layers a mandatory carbon tax on energy, waste, and transportation infrastructure on top of a voluntary carbon-trading market open to individuals and all infrastructure operators. The tax guarantees a baseline revenue stream; the voluntary market draws in private money through transparent allowance prices; and the two are wired into a circular loop of lifestyle reformation, environmental mitigation, and infrastructure adaptation meant to keep participation and funds growing. The authors intend this as an actionable funding channel that would let private capital help close the large annual infrastructure adaptation gap rather than relying on public budgets alone. They concede that the framework is still conceptual and that the quantitative relationships among its components are not yet defined.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the "integrated carbon market," defined as the fusion of a mandatory carbon tax with a voluntary carbon-trading market, and the fusion of lifestyle reformation, environmental mitigation, and infrastructure adaptation into one circular system. On the financial side, the machinery is a price-and-incentive stack: carbon taxes fix a floor and a transparent cost for energy, waste, and transportation infrastructure; allowance trading sets a real-time price that makes returns legible; and a personal decision tree orders allowance purchases from cheapest to most expensive, with government allowances as the costly last resort. On the behavioral side, the machinery is a positive feedback loop that the paper claims connects individual lifestyle change to lower consumption-based emissions, connects those emissions reductions to adaptation baseline scenarios, and connects funded adaptation outcomes back to greater public engagement and market participation. The paper also relies on a seven-category infrastructure typology and on advances in real-time carbon accounting, life-cycle assessment, and human-infrastructure-climate nexus research to make the prices and allowances credible.

What would settle it

Take any jurisdiction with an operating carbon tax or emissions-trading system, compute its annual revenue from energy, waste, and transportation infrastructure plus personal carbon-trading revenue, and compare it with that jurisdiction's documented annual cost of climate adaptation for infrastructure. If after several years of mature participation the revenue covers only a small fraction of the gap—say, under 10 percent—the framework's core claim that integrated carbon markets can bridge the financial shortfall fails for that case.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that an "integrated carbon market" can close the infrastructure climate-adaptation financing gap because it supplies the two things private capital lacks: adequate information and transparent incentives. The mechanism is twofold. Mandatory carbon taxes on the high-emitting infrastructure sectors—energy, transportation, and waste—set a clear price signal and provide a guaranteed minimum flow of funds into adaptation. Around this, a voluntary carbon market lets individuals, infrastructure operators, and governments trade carbon allowances, with participants acting as both suppliers and demanders; individuals who exceed their allowance buy from others, infrastructures buy mainly from other infrastructures, and purchases from government are the most expensive fallback. The revenue is earmarked for resilient construction, retrofitting, public-awareness programs, and information disclosure. The framework then ties these financial flows into an external cycle: reformed lifestyles lower personal and infrastructure emissions, mitigation results define baseline scenarios for adaptation, adaptation outcomes raise awareness and attract more participation, and the market sustains itself. The paper presents this as a comprehensive way to turn mitigation-oriented climate finance into durable adaptation funding.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a self-sustaining positive feedback loop will emerge—lifestyle reformation lowers emissions, mitigation generates funds, and visible adaptation attracts more participation—so that carbon-tax and allowance revenue reaches the scale of the infrastructure financing gap, a loop the paper does not quantify or test.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the framework works, carbon-tax revenue from energy, waste, and transportation infrastructure can seed adaptation funds immediately, even before voluntary-market participation takes off.
  • Infrastructure operators facing transparent carbon allowance prices could compare the cost of resilience upgrades against the cost of buying allowances, turning adaptation into a financially legible decision.
  • Individuals who trade personal carbon allowances become a direct funding source for adaptation while reducing consumption-based emissions, so the framework finances resilience from the demand side rather than only from public budgets.
  • A harmonized set of carbon-accounting standards across lifestyle, mitigation, and adaptation would replace the current split between bottom-up individual accounting and top-down government quotas, making climate actions more efficient.
  • If adaptation projects are visibly funded and publicized, the improved awareness is supposed to feed back into lifestyle change and market participation, creating the circular growth the framework depends on.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct arithmetic check not performed in the paper: for any jurisdiction, compare annual carbon-tax revenue from energy, waste, and transportation with the documented adaptation investment gap; if revenue covers only a small fraction of the gap, the central funding claim fails for that case.
  • The circular feedback loop implies a participation threshold: below some initial level of allowance trading and tax revenue the loop may collapse rather than self-sustain, so the carbon tax would have to carry the system until the market matures; the paper leaves that threshold unquantified.
  • A natural next step is a city-scale pilot that uses an existing personal carbon-trading scheme, earmarks its revenue to an infrastructure resilience fund, and measures whether per-capita participation rises after adaptation projects are delivered, providing the behavioral validation the framework currently lacks.
  • Treating adaptation funding as a byproduct of mitigation pricing could shift burden-sharing: jurisdictions with large carbon-tax bases would implicitly underwrite adaptation in regions with smaller bases unless fund-allocation rules explicitly prevent it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a conceptual policy framework, termed 'integrated carbon markets,' that combines mandatory carbon taxes, voluntary carbon markets, and personal carbon trading to generate funds for infrastructure climate adaptation. The framework links lifestyle reformation, environmental mitigation, and infrastructure adaptation in a circular positive feedback loop. The paper reviews the causes of underfunding, presents the framework and its claimed benefits (transparent costs and returns, improved human-infrastructure-climate knowledge, synergized climate actions), discusses implementation challenges and foundations, and concludes with a statement that the framework is conceptual and quantitative relationships are not yet defined.

Significance. The paper addresses a real and urgent problem: the large financing gap for infrastructure adaptation. It usefully synthesizes existing carbon pricing instruments and integrates individual-level and infrastructure-level emissions into a single market design. The framework is novel in connecting personal carbon trading to adaptation finance. The paper is honest about its limitations, explicitly stating in Section 6 that quantitative relationships are not defined. As a conceptual contribution, it may stimulate research and pilot design. However, the central claim that the framework can bridge the financial shortfall is not quantitatively demonstrated, and a structural tension between mitigation success and revenue generation is left unresolved.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, opening paragraph; Section 3.3] The paper's central claim is that the integrated carbon market 'addresses these deep issues and the financial shortfall' (Section 3, first paragraph). This claim depends on a self-sustaining loop in which mitigation reduces emissions and generates revenue for adaptation. However, the paper's own design makes carbon taxes and allowance purchases punitive measures to accelerate energy transition (Section 1, Fig.1b). If these measures succeed, emissions and traded allowance volumes decline, shrinking the tax base and allowance revenue. The paper does not specify a revenue-stabilizing mechanism such as an escalating tax schedule, a price floor, or an allowance supply rule. Section 6 concedes that the quantitative relationships between framework components are not yet defined. This is a structural accounting condition that must hold for the central claim; without it, the loop may be self-limiting rather than self-sustaining.
  2. [Section 3.1] The paper claims that the market provides 'transparent costs and returns' for participants, but the returns described are returns from trading carbon allowances, not returns on infrastructure climate adaptation investments. The original problem identified in Section 2.1 is that adaptation projects are unprofitable due to uncertain and long-term benefits. The proposed mechanism does not change the profitability of adaptation itself; it only creates a new revenue stream for governments and a market for allowances. The paper does not explain how this alters the private sector's investment calculus for adaptation projects. This gap undermines the claim that the framework incentivizes private capital to bridge the financial gap.
  3. [Section 2.1 and Section 6] The paper cites the scale of the adaptation financing need (about $120 billion per year, plus $4.1-4.5 trillion for infrastructure) but provides no quantitative estimate of the revenues that carbon taxes and carbon markets could generate under the proposed framework. Without order-of-magnitude calculations or a case study, the assertion that the framework can 'bridge financial gaps' is unsupported. Section 6 explicitly acknowledges that the proportions and values of carbon taxes and allowances are not defined. A conceptual paper can leave parameters for future work, but it should at least demonstrate that the proposed revenue sources are plausibly commensurate with the claimed need.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 6] The phrase 'offering cost consideration and uncertain return' appears to be a typo; the paper's argument requires 'transparent costs and returns' (as in Section 3.1), not uncertain returns.
  2. [Section 4.1] The verb 'collaborating' is misused in 'collaborating integrated carbon markets into infrastructure climate adaptation'; the intended word is likely 'integrating'.
  3. [Figure 1] The panels of Fig.1 are difficult to read because the figure is embedded after a page break and panel labels are not referenced clearly in the text; please improve the resolution and labeling.
  4. [References] References [57], [58], and [71] are the same publication (Parag and Fawcett 2014); please consolidate or cite different works.
  5. [Section 2.1] The cost figure of US$4.1-4.5 trillion per year is cited from CCFLA (2015), which is over a decade old; a more recent source or a caveat about inflation and scope would strengthen the motivation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the framework is explicitly conceptual, makes no fitted predictions, and its 'circular' feedback loop is a proposed policy mechanism rather than a derivation from its own conclusion.

full rationale

The paper proposes a conceptual financing framework, not a derivation. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, and no testable predictions, so the core circularity patterns (self-definitional reductions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, uniqueness imported from authors, ansatz smuggled via citation) do not apply. The central claim in Section 3 that 'the integrated carbon market addresses these deep issues and the financial shortfall in infrastructure climate adaptation by providing adequate information and transparent incentives' is an argumentative proposal supported by descriptive reasoning, not a conclusion derived from its own premise. The 'circular positive feedback' loop (abstract; Section 3.3; Fig.1a) is presented as a designed feature of the proposed market, not as evidence that the framework works; the paper explicitly concedes in Section 6 that 'the framework discussed here is still conceptual' and that quantitative relationships 'are not yet defined.' References are used as background evidence, and any references to authors' prior work are not load-bearing for the framework's logic. No step reduces to its inputs by construction, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests entirely on the paper's own framework and on background literature about carbon pricing. There are no fitted numerical parameters, but the core mechanism, a self-sustaining circular loop, is assumed rather than demonstrated. The framework itself is the main invented entity, and it lacks independent empirical support.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption A massive financing gap exists for infrastructure climate adaptation and must be closed with private capital.
    The paper cites CCFLA and CPI reports to show demand far exceeds current adaptation finance, then builds the framework around attracting private capital.
  • domain assumption Carbon pricing instruments, including carbon taxes and emissions trading, are effective at mobilizing private sector participation and raising funds.
    The paper relies on this to argue integrated carbon markets will bridge the gap; Section 2.2 cites global carbon pricing practice but does not derive it.
  • domain assumption Individuals and infrastructure operators will participate in voluntary carbon trading in sufficient numbers to make the market deep and liquid.
    The revenue mechanism depends on broad participation; Section 4.1 identifies motivation as an open question.
  • ad hoc to paper The circular positive feedback loop between lifestyle reformation, mitigation, and adaptation will reinforce itself rather than decay.
    This is the paper's core proposed mechanism; it is asserted in Section 3.3 and not modeled or tested.
invented entities (1)
  • Integrated carbon market framework
    purpose: A combined carbon tax and voluntary carbon market whose revenues are earmarked for infrastructure climate adaptation.
    The paper introduces this as a novel institutional design. No pilot, simulation, or quantitative case is provided, so there is no falsifiable handle outside the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Sustainable Circular Framework for Financing Infrastructure Climate Adaptation: Integrated Carbon Markets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4DI6PKJ6

@misc{pith2026250108004,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Sustainable Circular Framework for Financing Infrastructure Climate Adaptation: Integrated Carbon Markets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4DI6PKJ6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.08004}
}
read the original abstract

Climate physical risks pose an increasing threat to urban infrastructure, necessitating urgent climate adaptation measures to protect lives and assets. Implementing such measures, including the development of resilient infrastructure and retrofitting existing systems, demands substantial financial investment. Unfortunately, due to the unprofitability stemming from the long-term returns, uncertainty, and complexity of infrastructure adaptation projects and the short-term profit-seeking objectives of private capital, a massive financial gap remains. This study suggests incentivizing private capital to bridge financial gaps through integrated carbon markets. Specifically, the framework combines carbon taxes and carbon markets to involve infrastructure and individuals in the climate mitigation phase, using the funds collected for climate adaptation. Moreover, it integrates lifestyle reformation, environmental mitigation, and infrastructure adaptation to establish harmonized standards and provide circular positive feedback to sustain the markets. We further explore how integrated carbon markets can facilitate fund collection and discuss the challenges of incorporating them into infrastructure climate adaptation. This study aims to foster collaboration between private and public capital to enable a more scientific, rational, and actionable implementation of integrated carbon markets, thus supporting sustainable financial backing for infrastructure climate adaptation

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.08004 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Fig.1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Thacker, D

    S. Thacker, D. Adshead, M. Fay, S. Hallegatte, M. Harvey, H. Meller, N. O’Regan, J. Rozenberg, G. Watkins, J.W. Hall, Infrastructure for sustainable development, Nat Sustain 2 (2019) 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0256-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0256-8 2019

  2. [2]

    Murali, T

    G. Murali, T. Iwamura, S. Meiri, U. Roll, Future temperature extremes threaten land vertebrates, Nature 615 (2023) 461–467. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05606-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05606-z 2023

  3. [3]

    Tellman, J.A

    B. Tellman, J.A. Sullivan, C. Kuhn, A.J. Kettner, C.S. Doyle, G.R. Brakenridge, T.A. Erickson, D.A. Slayback, Satellite imaging reveals increased proportion of population exposed to floods, Nature 596 (2021) 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03695-w

    doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03695-w 2021

  4. [4]

    Zscheischler, S

    J. Zscheischler, S. Westra, B.J.J.M. van den Hurk, S.I. Seneviratne, P.J. Ward, A. Pitman, A. AghaKouchak, D.N. Bresch, M. Leonard, T. Wahl, X. Zhang, Future climate risk from compound events, Nature Climate Change 8 (2018) 469 –477. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0156-3

    doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0156-3 2018

  5. [5]

    K. Feng, M. Ouyang, N. Lin, Tropical cyclone -blackout-heatwave compound hazard resilience in a changing climate, Nature Communications 13 (2022) 4421. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32018-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32018-4 2022

  6. [6]

    K. Liu, Q. Wang, M. Wang, E.E. Koks, Global transportation infrastructure exposure to the change of precipitation in a warmer world, Nature Communications 14 (2023) 2541. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38203-3

    doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38203-3 2023

  7. [7]

    Hallegatte, J

    S. Hallegatte, J. Rentschler, J. Rozenberg, Lifelines: The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity, Washington, DC: World Bank, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1430- 3

    work page doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1430- 2019

  8. [8]

    E.E. Koks, J. Rozenberg, C. Zorn, M. Tariverdi, M. V ousdoukas, S.A. Fraser, J.W. Hall, S. Hallegatte, A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets, Nat 13 / 18 This is a preprint uploaded to arXiv. *Corresponding author: Xing Su. Email address: xsu@zju.edu.cn. Commun 10 (2019) 2677. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10442-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10442-3 2019

Show all 99 references
  1. [9]

    Chrobak, Adapting to Climate Change: What Might Be Needed?, Engineering (Beijing) 6 (2020) 1214–1216

    U. Chrobak, Adapting to Climate Change: What Might Be Needed?, Engineering (Beijing) 6 (2020) 1214–1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.09.004

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    Sharifi, Co -benefits and synergies between urban climate change mitigation and adaptation measures: A literature review, Science of the Total Environment 750 (2021) 141642

    A. Sharifi, Co -benefits and synergies between urban climate change mitigation and adaptation measures: A literature review, Science of the Total Environment 750 (2021) 141642

    2021

  3. [11]

    Kennedy, J

    C. Kennedy, J. Corfee -Morlot, Past performance and future needs for low carbon climate resilient infrastructure–An investment perspective, Energy Policy 59 (2013) 773–783

    2013

  4. [12]

    Financing adaptation, Nat. Clim. Chang. 11 (2021) 887 –887. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01213-4

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    Currie-Alder, C

    B. Currie-Alder, C. Rosenzweig, M. Chen, J. Nalau, A. Patwardhan, Y . Wang, Research for climate adaptation, Commun Earth Environ 2 (2021) 1 –3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247 - 021-00294-5

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    Adhikari, L.S

    B. Adhikari, L.S. Safaee Chalkasra, Mobilizing private sector investment for climate action: enhancing ambition and scaling up implementation, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 13 (2023) 1110–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1917929

    2023

  7. [15]

    Koetse, P

    M.J. Koetse, P. Rietveld, Adaptation to Climate Change in the Transport Sector, Transport Reviews 32 (2012) 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2012.657716

    2012

  8. [16]

    Timilsina, Financing Climate Change Adaptation: International Initiatives, Sustainability 13 (2021)

    G.R. Timilsina, Financing Climate Change Adaptation: International Initiatives, Sustainability 13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126515

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    M. Khan, S. Robinson, R. Weikmans, D. Ciplet, J.T. Roberts, Twenty -five years of adaptation finance through a climate justice lens, Climatic Change 161 (2020) 251 –269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02563-x

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    Biesbroek, A

    R. Biesbroek, A. Delaney, Mapping the evidence of climate change adaptation policy instruments in Europe, Environmental Research Letters 15 (2020) 083005

    2020

  11. [19]

    von Braun, V

    J. von Braun, V . Ramanathan, P.K.A. Turkson, Climate mitigation is not enough — focus on resilience now, Nature 610 (2022) 257–257. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03234-1

    2022 doi

  12. [20]

    D. Guo, H. Chen, R. Long, Y . Ni, An integrated measurement of household carbon emissions from a trading -oriented perspective: a case study of urban families in Xuzhou, China, Journal of Cleaner Production 188 (2018) 613–624

    2018

  13. [21]

    Narassimhan, K.S

    E. Narassimhan, K.S. Gallagher, S. Koester, J.R. Alejo, Carbon pricing in practice: a review of existing emissions trading systems, Climate Policy 18 (2018) 967 –991. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1467827

    2018

  14. [22]

    B. Shi, N. Li, Q. Gao, G. Li, Market incentives, carbon quota allocation and carbon emission reduction: evidence from China’s carbon trading pilot policy, Journal of Environmental Management 319 (2022) 115650

    2022

  15. [23]

    Forni, M

    L. Forni, M. Catalano, E. Pezzolla, Increasing resilience: Fiscal policy for climate adaptation, in: Fiscal Policies for Development and Climate Action, World Bank Group, 2018: pp. 115 – 133

    2018

  16. [24]

    Nirandjan, E.E

    S. Nirandjan, E.E. Koks, P.J. Ward, J.C.J.H. Aerts, A spatially -explicit harmonized global dataset of critical infrastructure, Sci Data 9 (2022) 150. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597 -022- 01218-4

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    R. Pant, S. Thacker, J.W. Hall, D. Alderson, S. Barr, Critical infrastructure impact 14 / 18 This is a preprint uploaded to arXiv. *Corresponding author: Xing Su. Email address: xsu@zju.edu.cn. assessment due to flood exposure, Journal of Flood Risk Management 11 (2018) 22–33

    2018

  18. [26]

    H. Hou, X. Feng, Y . Zhang, H. Bai, Y . Ji, H. Xu, Energy-related carbon emissions mitigation potential for the construction sector in China, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 89 (2021) 106599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106599

    2021

  19. [27]

    Alliance, The state of city climate finance, (2015)

    C.C.F. Alliance, The state of city climate finance, (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    White, S

    R. White, S. Wahba, Addressing constraints to private financing of urban (climate) infrastructure in developing countries, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development 11 (2019) 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2018.1559970

    2019

  21. [29]

    Chester, B.S

    M.V . Chester, B.S. Underwood, C. Samaras, Keeping infrastructure reliable under climate uncertainty, Nat. Clim. Chang. 10 (2020) 488 –490. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558 -020- 0741-0

    2020 doi

  22. [30]

    Hoffmann, Estimating the benefits of adaptation to extreme climate events, focusing on nonmarket damages, Ecological Economics 164 (2019) 106250

    C. Hoffmann, Estimating the benefits of adaptation to extreme climate events, focusing on nonmarket damages, Ecological Economics 164 (2019) 106250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.014

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    Althoey, W.S

    F. Althoey, W.S. Ansari, M. Sufian, A.F. Deifalla, Advancements in low-carbon concrete as a construction material for the sustainable built environment, Developments in the Built Environment 16 (2023) 100284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100284

    2023

  24. [32]

    M.R. Khan, S. Munira, Climate change adaptation as a global public good: implications for financing, Climatic Change 167 (2021) 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03195-w

    2021 doi

  25. [33]

    Guthrie, Optimal adaptation to uncertain climate change, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 151 (2023) 104621

    G. Guthrie, Optimal adaptation to uncertain climate change, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 151 (2023) 104621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2023.104621

    2023

  26. [34]

    Kijewski -Correa, D

    T. Kijewski -Correa, D. Javeline, W. Kakenmaster, A. Chesler, Economic incentives for coastal homeowner adaptation to climate change, Climate Policy 23 (2023) 1314 –1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2215207

    2023

  27. [35]

    Gourevitch, C

    J.D. Gourevitch, C. Kousky, Y . (Penny) Liao, C. Nolte, A.B. Pollack, J.R. Porter, J.A. Weill, Unpriced climate risk and the potential consequences of overvaluation in US housing markets, Nat. Clim. Chang. 13 (2023) 250 –257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01594- 8

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    M. Hino, M. Burke, The effect of information about climate risk on property values, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (2021) e2003374118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2003374118

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    Hennighausen, Y

    H. Hennighausen, Y . Liao, C. Nolte, A. Pollack, Flood insurance reforms, housing market dynamics, and adaptation to climate risks, Journal of Housing Economics 62 (2023) 101953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101953

    2023

  30. [38]

    S.Y . In, J.P. Weyant, B. Manav, Pricing climate -related risks of energy investments, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 154 (2022) 111881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111881

    2022

  31. [39]

    Chester, Sustainability and infrastructure challenges, Nat Sustain 2 (2019) 265 –266

    M.V . Chester, Sustainability and infrastructure challenges, Nat Sustain 2 (2019) 265 –266. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0272-8

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    Groß e, A review of the foundations of systems, infrastructure and governance, Safety Science 160 (2023) 106060

    C. Groß e, A review of the foundations of systems, infrastructure and governance, Safety Science 160 (2023) 106060

    2023

  33. [41]

    Rinaldi, J.P

    S.M. Rinaldi, J.P. Peerenboom, T.K. Kelly, Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies, IEEE Control Systems Magazine 21 (2001) 11–25. 15 / 18 This is a preprint uploaded to arXiv. *Corresponding author: Xing Su. Email address: xsu@zju.edu.cn

    2001

  34. [42]

    Boon -Falleur, A

    M. Boon -Falleur, A. Grandin, N. Baumard, C. Chevallier, Leveraging social cognition to promote effective climate change mitigation, Nat. Clim. Chang. 12 (2022) 332 –338. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01312-w

    2022 doi

  35. [43]

    Chen, Interdependent Critical Infrastructures, in: X.W

    X.W. Chen, Interdependent Critical Infrastructures, in: X.W. Chen (Ed.), Network Science Models for Data Analytics Automation: Theories and Applications, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022: pp. 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96470-2_2

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    Luiijf, A.H

    H.A.M. Luiijf, A.H. Nieuwenhuijs, M.H.A. Klaver, M.J.G. Van Eeten, Edite Cruz, Empirical findings on European critical infrastructure dependencies, International Journal of System of Systems Engineering 2 (2010) 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSE.2010.035378

    2010 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Sadiq, C

    M. Sadiq, C. Paramaiah, Z. Dong, M.A. Nawaz, N.K. Shukurullaevich, Role of fintech, green finance, and natural resource rents in sustainable climate change in China. Mediating role of environmental regulations and government interventions in the pre-post COVID eras, Resources ...

    2024

  38. [46]

    J. Wang, W. Li, Natural resources -financial innovation-carbon neutrality nexus: The role of policy robustness, Resources Policy 89 (2024) 104543

    2024

  39. [47]

    Ledger, C

    E. Ledger, C. Klöck, Climate justice through climate finance? Australia’s approach to climate finance in the Pacific, Npj Clim. Action 2 (2023) 1 –12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-023-00053-6

    2023 doi

  40. [48]

    Aboagye, A

    P.D. Aboagye, A. Sharifi, Urban climate adaptation and mitigation action plans: A critical review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 189 (2024) 113886

    2024

  41. [49]

    Bhandary, K.S

    R.R. Bhandary, K.S. Gallagher, F. Zhang, Climate finance policy in practice: A review of the evidence, Climate Policy 21 (2021) 529–545

    2021

  42. [50]

    Wamsler, B

    C. Wamsler, B. Wickenberg, H. Hanson, J.A. Olsson, S. Stå lhammar, H. Bjö rn, H. Falck, D. Gerell, T. Oskarsson, E. Simonsson, Environmental and climate policy integration: Targeted strategies for overcoming barriers to nature -based solutions and climate change adaptation, Jo...

    2020

  43. [51]

    Zamarioli, P

    L.H. Zamarioli, P. Pauw, M. Kö nig, H. Chenet, The climate consistency goal and the transformation of global finance, Nat. Clim. Chang. 11 (2021) 578 –583. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01083-w

    2021 doi

  44. [52]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, University leadership in climate mitigation: reducing emissions from waste through carbon pricing, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 23 (2022) 587–603

    2022

  45. [53]

    Dolphin, Q

    G. Dolphin, Q. Xiahou, World carbon pricing database: sources and methods, Sci Data 9 (2022) 573. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01659-x

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    Bank, State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2023, 2023

    W. Bank, State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2023, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1596/39796

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    Hagmann, E.H

    D. Hagmann, E.H. Ho, G. Loewenstein, Nudging out support for a carbon tax, Nat. Clim. Chang. 9 (2019) 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0474-0

    2019 doi

  48. [56]

    Zhang, S

    Y . Zhang, S. Jiang, X. Lin, L. Qi, B. Sharp, Income distribution effect of carbon pricing mechanism under China’s carbon peak target: CGE -based assessments, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 101 (2023) 107149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107149

    2023

  49. [57]

    Y.-E. Tang, R. Fan, A. -Z. Cai, L. -Y . Wang, R.-M. Lin, X. -Z. Meng, L. Chen, R. Guo, Rethinking personal carbon trading (PCT) mechanism: A comprehensive review, Journal of Environmental Management 344 (2023) 118478. 16 / 18 This is a preprint uploaded to arXiv. *Correspondin...

    2023

  50. [59]

    Stoddard, K

    I. Stoddard, K. Anderson, S. Capstick, W. Carton, J. Depledge, K. Facer, C. Gough, F. Hache, C. Hoolohan, M. Hultman, N. Hä llströ m, S. Kartha, S. Klinsky, M. Kuchler, E. Lö vbrand, N. Nasiritousi, P. Newell, G.P. Peters, Y . Sokona, A. Stirling, M. Stilwell, C.L. Spash, M. W...

    2021 doi

  51. [60]

    Cheng, A

    Y . Cheng, A. Sinha, V . Ghosh, T. Sengupta, H. Luo, Carbon tax and energy innovation at crossroads of carbon neutrality: Designing a sustainable decarbonization policy, Journal of Environmental Management 294 (2021) 112957

    2021

  52. [61]

    Shobande, L

    O.A. Shobande, L. Ogbeifun, A.K. Tiwari, Extricating the impacts of emissions trading system and energy transition on carbon intensity, Applied Energy 357 (2024) 122461

    2024

  53. [62]

    Tsai, Y .-H

    W.-H. Tsai, Y .-H. Lu, C.-L. Hsieh, Comparison of production decision-making models under carbon tax and carbon rights trading, Journal of Cleaner Production 379 (2022) 134462

    2022

  54. [63]

    Glaeser, D

    E.L. Glaeser, D. Laibson, B. Sacerdote, An economic approach to social capital, The Economic Journal 112 (2002) F437–F458

    2002

  55. [64]

    Dumas, J.L

    M. Dumas, J.L. Barker, E.A. Power, When does reputation lie? Dynamic feedbacks between costly signals, social capital and social prominence, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 376 (2021) 20200298

    2021

  56. [65]

    Rasoulkhani, A

    K. Rasoulkhani, A. Mostafavi, Resilience as an emergent property of human -infrastructure dynamics: A multi-agent simulation model for characterizing regime shifts and tipping point behaviors in infrastructure systems, PLOS ONE 13 (2018) e0207674. https://doi.org/10.1371/journ...

    2018 doi

  57. [66]

    Rasoulkhani, A

    K. Rasoulkhani, A. Mostafavi, M.P. Reyes, M. Batouli, Resilience planning in hazards - humans-infrastructure nexus: A multi-agent simulation for exploratory assessment of coastal water supply infrastructure adaptation to sea -level rise, Environmental Modelling & Software 125 ...

    2020

  58. [67]

    Remme, H

    R.P. Remme, H. Frumkin, A.D. Guerry, A.C. King, L. Mandle, C. Sarabu, G.N. Bratman, B. Giles-Corti, P. Hamel, B. Han, J.L. Hicks, P. James, J.J. Lawler, T. Lindahl, H. Liu, Y . Lu, B. Oosterbroek, B. Paudel, J.F. Sallis, J. Schipperijn, R. Sosič, S. de Vries, B.W. Wheeler, S.A...

    2021 doi

  59. [68]

    J. Wang, K. Foley, Promoting climate -resilient cities: Developing an attitudinal analytical framework for understanding the relationship between humans and blue -green infrastructure, Environmental Science & Policy 146 (2023) 133–143

    2023

  60. [69]

    Sallis, E

    J.F. Sallis, E. Cerin, T.L. Conway, M.A. Adams, L.D. Frank, M. Pratt, D. Salvo, J. Schipperijn, G. Smith, K.L. Cain, Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: a cross-sectional study, The Lancet 387 (2016) 2207–2217

    2016

  61. [70]

    I. Josa, A. Aguado, Infrastructures and society: from a literature review to a conceptual framework, Journal of Cleaner Production 238 (2019) 117741. 17 / 18 This is a preprint uploaded to arXiv. *Corresponding author: Xing Su. Email address: xsu@zju.edu.cn

    2019

  62. [71]

    Parag, T

    Y . Parag, T. Fawcett, Personal carbon trading: a review of research evidence and real -world experience of a radical idea, Energy and Emission Control Technologies (2014) 23–32

    2014

  63. [72]

    W. Lutz, R. Muttarak, E. Striessnig, Universal education is key to enhanced climate adaptation, Science 346 (2014) 1061–1062. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257975

    2014 doi

  64. [73]

    B. Lin, M. Yang, Choosing the right policy: Factors influencing the preferences of consumption-side personal carbon reduction policies, Journal of Environmental Management 326 (2023) 116706

    2023

  65. [74]

    Dekker, A.F

    M.M. Dekker, A.F. Hof, M. van den Berg, V . Daioglou, R. van Heerden, K.-I. van der Wijst, D.P. van Vuuren, Spread in climate policy scenarios unravelled, Nature 624 (2023) 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06738-6

    2023 doi

  66. [75]

    C. Feng, G. Ye, J. Zeng, J. Zeng, Q. Jiang, L. He, Y . Zhang, Z. Xu, Sustainably developing global blue carbon for climate change mitigation and economic benefits through international cooperation, Nature Communications 14 (2023) 6144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41870-x

    2023 doi

  67. [76]

    L. Shi, S. Moser, Transformative climate adaptation in the United States: Trends and prospects, Science 372 (2021) eabc8054. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc8054

    2021 doi

  68. [77]

    Georgescu, A.M

    M. Georgescu, A.M. Broadbent, E.S. Krayenhoff, Quantifying the decrease in heat exposure through adaptation and mitigation in twenty-first-century US cities, Nat Cities 1 (2024) 42 –

    2024

  69. [78]

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-023-00001-9

    doi

  70. [79]

    Wu, Role of green finance and carbon accounting in achieving sustainability, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11 (2024) 128

    J. Wu, Role of green finance and carbon accounting in achieving sustainability, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11 (2024) 128. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599 -023- 02492-2

    2024 doi

  71. [80]

    Tesselaar, W.J.W

    M. Tesselaar, W.J.W. Botzen, T. Tiggeloven, J.C.J.H. Aerts, Flood insurance is a driver of population growth in European floodplains, Nature Communications 14 (2023) 7483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43229-8

    2023 doi

  72. [81]

    Wagner, Designing insurance for climate change, Nature Climate Change 12 (2022) 1070–1072

    K.R.H. Wagner, Designing insurance for climate change, Nature Climate Change 12 (2022) 1070–1072. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01514-2

    2022 doi

  73. [82]

    Barbhuiya, S

    S. Barbhuiya, S. Barbhuiya, H. Nikraz, Adaptation to the future climate: A low carbon building design challenge, Procedia Engineering 51 (2013) 194–199

    2013

  74. [83]

    Weber, Experience -based and description -based perceptions of long -term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet), Climatic Change 77 (2006) 103–120

    E.U. Weber, Experience -based and description -based perceptions of long -term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet), Climatic Change 77 (2006) 103–120

    2006

  75. [84]

    Landauer, S

    M. Landauer, S. Juhola, M. Sö derholm, Inter -relationships between adaptation and mitigation: a systematic literature review, Climatic Change 131 (2015) 505 –517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1395-1

    2015 doi

  76. [85]

    Uusitalo, A

    V . Uusitalo, A. Huttunen, E. Kareinen, T. von Wright, M. Valjakka, A. Pitkä nen, J. Levä nen, Using personal carbon trading to reduce mobility emissions: A pilot in the Finnish city of Lahti, Transport Policy 126 (2022) 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.022

    2022 doi

  77. [86]

    Wadud, Personal tradable carbon permits for road transport: Why, why not and who wins?, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 45 (2011) 1052 –1065

    Z. Wadud, Personal tradable carbon permits for road transport: Why, why not and who wins?, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 45 (2011) 1052 –1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.03.002

    2011 doi

  78. [87]

    Caldarelli, E

    G. Caldarelli, E. Arcaute, M. Barthelemy, M. Batty, C. Gershenson, D. Helbing, S. Mancuso, Y . Moreno, J.J. Ramasco, C. Rozenblat, A. Sá nchez, J.L. Ferná ndez-Villacañ as, The role of complexity for digital twins of cities, Nat Comput Sci 3 (2023) 374 –381. 18 / 18 This is a ...

    2023 doi

  79. [88]

    Gatti, Project finance in theory and practice: designing, structuring, and financing private and public projects, Elsevier, 2023

    S. Gatti, Project finance in theory and practice: designing, structuring, and financing private and public projects, Elsevier, 2023

    2023

  80. [89]

    Fuso Nerini, T

    F. Fuso Nerini, T. Fawcett, Y . Parag, P. Ekins, Personal carbon allowances revisited, Nat Sustain 4 (2021) 1025–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00756-w

    2021 doi

  81. [90]

    Kormos, R

    C. Kormos, R. Gifford, E. Brown, The Influence of Descriptive Social Norm Information on Sustainable Transportation Behavior: A Field Experiment, Environment and Behavior 47 (2015) 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513520416

    2015 doi

  82. [91]

    X. Tan, X. Wang, S.H.A. Zaidi, What drives public willingness to participate in the voluntary personal carbon -trading scheme? A case study of Guangzhou Pilot, China, Ecological Economics 165 (2019) 106389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106389

    2019

  83. [92]

    Lobo, R.M

    J. Lobo, R.M. Aggarwal, M. Alberti, M. Allen -Dumas, L.M.A. Bettencourt, C. Boone, C. Brelsford, V .C. Broto, H. Eakin, S. Bagchi -Sen, S. Meerow, C. D’Cruz, A. Revi, D.C. Roberts, M.E. Smith, A. York, T. Lin, X. Bai, W. Solecki, D. Pataki, L.B. Tapia, M. Rockman, M. Wolfram, ...

    2023 doi

  84. [93]

    Galderisi, S

    A. Galderisi, S. Menoni, G. Setti, A. Tognon, Disaster Recovery Reform and Resilience, in: S. Eslamian, F. Eslamian (Eds.), Disaster Risk Reduction for Resilience: Disaster and Social Aspects, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022: pp. 25 –54. https://doi.org/10.1007/9...

    2022 doi

  85. [94]

    Fekete, T

    H. Fekete, T. Kuramochi, M. Roelfsema, M. den Elzen, N. Forsell, N. Hö hne, L. Luna, F. Hans, S. Sterl, J. Olivier, H. van Soest, S. Frank, M. Gusti, A review of successful climate change mitigation policies in major emitting economies and the potential of global replication, ...

    2021

  86. [95]

    Biesbroek, Policy integration and climate change adaptation, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 52 (2021) 75–81

    R. Biesbroek, Policy integration and climate change adaptation, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 52 (2021) 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.07.003

    2021 doi

  87. [96]

    Pitkä nen, T

    A. Pitkä nen, T. von Wright, J. Kaseva, H. Kahiluoto, Distributional fairness of personal carbon trading, Ecological Economics 201 (2022) 107587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107587

    2022

  88. [97]

    Kumar, Green Climate Fund faces slew of criticism, Nature 527 (2015) 419 –420

    S. Kumar, Green Climate Fund faces slew of criticism, Nature 527 (2015) 419 –420. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2015.18815

    2015

  89. [98]

    L. Kuhl, I. Ahmed, M.F. Rahman, J. Shinn, J. Arango -Quiroga, S. Huq, Climate loss -and- damage funding: how to get money to where it’s needed fast, Nature 623 (2023) 693 –695. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03605-2

    2023 doi

  90. [99]

    Ciullo, E

    A. Ciullo, E. Strobl, S. Meiler, O. Martius, D.N. Bresch, Increasing countries’ financial resilience through global catastrophe risk pooling, Nature Communications 14 (2023) 922. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36539-4

    2023 doi

  91. [100]

    Siby, INDIA IN THE LANDSCAPE OF CLIMATE FINANCE: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES, EPRA International Journal of Climate and Resource Economic Review (CRER) 11 (2023) 1–4

    K.M. Siby, INDIA IN THE LANDSCAPE OF CLIMATE FINANCE: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES, EPRA International Journal of Climate and Resource Economic Review (CRER) 11 (2023) 1–4

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.