arxiv: 1902.07955 · v2 · ★pith:4E5X5HI4new · submitted 2019-02-21 · ✦ hep-ex
Amplitude analysis of B⁰_(s) rightarrow K⁰_{textrm{S}} K^(pm)π^(mp) decays
show 837 more authors
read the original abstract
The first untagged decay-time-integrated amplitude analysis of $B^{0}_{s} \rightarrow K^{0}_{\textrm{S}} K^{\pm}\pi^{\mp}$ decays is performed using a sample corresponding to $3.0\,$fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collision data recorded with the LHCb detector during 2011 and 2012. The data are described with an amplitude model that contains contributions from the intermediate resonances $K^{*}(892)^{0,+}$, $K^*_2(1430)^{0,+}$ and $K^*_0(1430)^{0,+}$, and their charge conjugates. Measurements of the branching fractions of the decay modes $B^{0}_{s} \rightarrow K^{*}(892)^{\pm}K^{\mp}$ and $B^{0}_{s} \rightarrow K^{*}(892)^{0}\kern 0.2em\overline{\kern -0.2em K}{}^{0}, \kern 0.2em\overline{\kern -0.2em K}{}^{*}(892)^{0}K^{0}$ are in agreement with, and more precise than, previous results. The decays $B^{0}_{s} \rightarrow K^*_0(1430)^{\pm} K^{\mp}$ and $B^{0}_{s} \rightarrow K^{*}_{0}(1430)^{0}\kern 0.2em\overline{\kern -0.2em K}{}^{0}, \kern 0.2em\overline{\kern -0.2em K}{}^{*}_{0}(1430)^{0}K^{0}$ are observed for the first time, each with significance over 10 standard deviations.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.
-
Method to study $CP$ violation in $B_s^0\to K_S K^\pm \pi^\mp$ decays
hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0
A method is developed to relate amplitudes for B_s^0 → K_S K* resonances in the two final states, enabling the first tagged decay-time-dependent Dalitz analysis to measure the effective weak phase φ_s^eff.
-
Measurement of the branching fractions and longitudinal polarisations of $B^0_{(s)} \to K^{*0} \kern 0.18em \overline{\kern -0.18em K}{}^{*0}$ decays
hep-ex 2025-12 accept novelty 4.0
LHCb measures f_L^d = 0.600 and f_L^s = 0.159 for B to K* Kbar* decays and reports a ratio L of 4.92 that confirms 4.4 sigma discrepancy with theory.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.