Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

$H_0$ Tension: Response to Riess et al arXiv:1810.03526

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.07628 v1 pith:4F5XD3VO submitted 2018-10-17 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.GA
keywords riessanalysescepheidgaiashankstensionthereadvance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Riess et al (2018c) have claimed there exist seven problems in the analyses presented by Shanks et al (2018) where we argue that there is enough uncertainty in Cepheid distances and local peculiar velocity fields to explain the current tension in $H_0$. Here, we take each of the Riess et al (2018c) points in turn and suggest that either they do not apply or that the necessary caveats are already made by Shanks et al (2018). We conclude that the main point to be inferred from our analyses still stands which is that previous claims by Riess et al (2018b) that Gaia parallaxes confirm their Cepheid scale are, at best, premature in advance of further improvements in the Gaia astrometric solution.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Local Hole revisited: evidence for bulk motions and self-consistent outflow

    astro-ph.CO 2019-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The Local Hole underdensity appears self-consistent with galaxy peculiar velocities from the z(m) Hubble diagram and may explain a 2-3% local boost to H0, though supernova data disagree.

Pith tools