Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A quantitative analysis of systematic differences in positions and proper motions of Gaia DR2 with respect to VLBI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1808.05114 v3 pith:4FIOH3UP submitted 2018-08-15 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords positionpropersourcesgaiamatchedmotionsvlbidifferences
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We have analyzed the differences in positions of 9081 matched sources between the Gaia DR2 and VLBI catalogues. The median position uncertainty of matched sources in the VLBI catalogue is a factor of two larger than the median position uncertainty in the Gaia DR2. There are 9% matched sources with statistically significant offsets between both catalogues. We found that reported positional errors should be re-scaled by a factor of 1.3 for VLBI and 1.06 for Gaia, and in addition, Gaia errors should be multiplied by the square root of chi square per degree of freedom in order to best fit the normalized position differences to the Rayleigh distribution. We have established that the major contributor to statistically significant position offsets is the presence of optical jets. Among the sources for which the jet direction was determined, the position offsets are parallel to the jet directions for 62% of the outliers. Among the matched sources with significant proper motion, the fraction of objects with proper motion directions parallel to jets is a factor of 3 greater than on average. Such sources have systematically higher chi square per degree of freedom. We explain these proper motions as a manifestation of the source position jitter caused by flares that we have predicted earlier. Therefore, the assumption that quasars are fixed points and therefore, differential proper motions determined with respect to quasar photocenters can be regarded as absolute proper motions, should be treated with a great caution.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 72 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Gaia parallax bias via spherical harmonics: A Python tool and discussion of possible causes

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A spherical-harmonic fit to a million quasar parallaxes yields a sky-map correction tool for Gaia DR3, revealing a dipole-like pattern and showing the zero-point leaks into proper motions.

  2. Dual AGN and Multiple SMBH Systems in the Era of SKAO

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review outlining radio methods for dual AGN and SMBHB detection and the role of SKAO in enabling comprehensive studies across cosmic time.

Pith tools