Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Improving Wald's (approximate) sequential probability ratio test by avoiding overshoot

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.16076 v4 pith:4GFSPOQD submitted 2024-10-21 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords betaalphaapproximatesprttestthresholdssequentialwhen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Wald's sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) is a cornerstone of sequential analysis. Based on desired type-I, II error levels $\alpha, \beta$, it stops when the likelihood ratio crosses certain thresholds, guaranteeing optimality of the expected sample size. However, these thresholds are not closed form and the test is often applied with approximate thresholds $(1-\beta)/\alpha$ and $\beta/(1-\alpha)$ (approximate SPRT). When $\beta > 0$, this neither guarantees error control at $\alpha,\beta$ nor optimality. When $\beta=0$ (power-one SPRT), this method is conservative and not optimal. The looseness in both cases is caused by \emph{overshoot}: the test statistic overshoots the thresholds at the stopping time. Numerically calculating thresholds may be infeasible, and most software packages do not do this. We improve the approximate SPRT by modifying the test statistic to avoid overshoot. Our `sequential boosting' technique uniformly improves power-one SPRTs $(\beta=0)$ for simple nulls and alternatives, or for one-sided nulls and alternatives in exponential families. When $\beta > 0$, our techniques provide guaranteed error control at $\alpha,\beta$, while needing less samples than the approximate SPRT in our simulations. We also provide several nontrivial extensions: confidence sequences, sampling without replacement and conformal martingales.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Anytime-Valid Tests for Sparse Anomalies

    math.ST 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Sequential anytime-valid tests for sparse Gaussian anomalies become possible exactly at the fixed-sample detection time t*=T*rho(beta*), and an adaptive mixture test achieves the same threshold without knowing the ano...

Pith tools