REVIEW 3 cited by
Regularized Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Highly Adaptive Lasso Implied Working Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We address the challenge of performing Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE) after an initial Highly Adaptive Lasso (HAL) fit. Existing approaches that utilize the data-adaptive working model selected by HAL-such as the relaxed HAL update-can be simple and versatile but may become computationally unstable when the HAL basis expansions introduce collinearity. Undersmoothed HAL may fail to solve the efficient influence curve (EIC) at the desired level without overfitting, particularly in complex settings like survival-curve estimation. A full HAL-TMLE, which treats HAL as the initial estimator and then targets in the nonparametric or semiparametric model, typically demands costly iterative clever-covariate calculations in complex set-ups like survival analysis and longitudinal mediation analysis. To overcome these limitations, we propose two new HAL-TMLEs that operate within the finite-dimensional working model implied by HAL: Delta-method regHAL-TMLE and Projection-based regHAL-TMLE. We conduct extensive simulations to demonstrate the performance of our proposed methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Targeted Highly Adaptive Lasso Minimum Loss Estimation of Target Functions
Targeted HAL-MLE projects a non-pathwise-differentiable target onto a HAL spline working model, applies LASSO-targeted TMLE, and attains dimension-free pointwise asymptotic normality up to log n factors.
-
When Does Trial-Real-World Data Fusion Improve Precision? Model Auditing and Selection-Aware Inference for Adaptive-TMLE
Under A-TMLE, RCT+RWD efficiency gain is driven by bias magnitude not complexity, crosses break-even near one residual SD of bias, erodes with sample size, and only a block jackknife gives honest intervals for the gain.
-
When Does Trial-Real-World Data Fusion Improve Precision? Model Auditing and Selection-Aware Inference for Adaptive-TMLE
Fusing trial and real-world data improves precision only for small real-world bias and small trials, and only a conservative block-jackknife interval gives honest uncertainty for that gain.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.