Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 3 minor 43 references

Terahertz Integrated Sensing Communications and Powering for 6G Wireless Networks

T0 review · 5 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a THz integrated sensing, communications, and powering system, jointly optimizing the sensing time ratio and the power splitting ratio maximizes achievable rate or harvested energy while meeting a constraint on the other, and numerical…

desk verdict A useful THz-ISCAP problem formulation with a transparent parameter sweep, but the received-power model squares a power-based misalignment factor and the analytic claims are unproven, so the reported optima are not reliable. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13006 v1 pith:4HIIGCCW submitted 2025-01-22 eess.SP

Hua Yan , Yunfei Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SP
keywords terahertzintegratedsensingcommunicationsandpowering6Gbeammisalignmentsimultaneouswirelessinformationpowertransferrate-energytrade-offtimeallocationmolecularabsorption
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a terahertz integrated sensing, communications, and powering (THz-ISCAP) system in which sensing is used to reduce beam misalignment before simultaneous wireless information and power transfer. It tries to establish that, for a fixed time frame, there is an optimal sensing time ratio and an optimal power splitting ratio that jointly maximize the harvested energy subject to a rate requirement, or the achievable rate subject to an energy requirement. The authors derive monotonicity properties that allow efficient numerical optimization, and they report concrete optima: with a rate constraint of 1500 bits/Hz, maximum harvested energy is 3.63386 w·s at (0.28, 0.84); with an energy constraint of 3.5 w·s, maximum rate is 1519.1 bits/Hz at (0.28, 0.81). They also show that higher THz frequency and larger transmit aperture improve both energy and rate in the studied range, and that certain absorption frequencies cause dips in performance. These results suggest that sensing time and power splitting can serve as tuning knobs for balancing communication and energy delivery in future 6G THz networks.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the exponential misalignment decay model, lmis(t)=l0 $e^{{−α t}}$, which converts sensing time into improved beam alignment and therefore into received power. Combined with the power-splitting ratio ρ1, this gives harvested energy E and achievable rate R as functions of (ρ0, ρ1); the paper shows that E increases with ρ1, R decreases with ρ1, and both increase then decrease with ρ0, so that the constrained optima lie at interior points found by bisection and a divide-and-conquer search. Supporting components are the aperture-antenna gain, Fresnel-region path-loss correction, molecular absorption, beam collection efficiency, and a non-linear RF-to-DC conversion model.

What would settle it

Run a THz beam-alignment loop with the paper's parameters and record the misalignment error lmis over time; if the measured decay deviates substantially from l0 $e^{{−0.1 t}}$ (for example, it has a floor above zero or a different rate), recompute the optima and compare them with ρ0*=0.28 and E*=3.63386 w·s under the 1500 bits/Hz rate constraint.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Within a two-phase THz frame—sensing first to reduce beam misalignment, then simultaneous wireless information and power transfer—the paper claims that a joint choice of the sensing time fraction ρ0 and the received-power splitting fraction ρ1 maximizes the system's performance. With a minimum rate of 1500 bits/Hz, the maximum harvested energy is 3.63386 w·s at (ρ0, ρ1)=(0.28, 0.84); with a minimum energy of 3.5 w·s, the maximum rate is 1519.1 bits/Hz at (0.28, 0.81). The paper also finds that higher THz frequencies and larger transmit apertures improve both energy and rate in the considered settings, and that both performance measures benefit from an interior, balanced optimum rather than an extreme allocation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that beam misalignment error shrinks exponentially with sensing time according to lmis(t)=l0 $e^{{−α t}}$ with fixed constants l0=0.8 and α=0.1; if real alignment does not follow that curve, the optimal sensing time and the whole rate-energy trade-off change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any fixed frame time, the optimal sensing time and power splitting ratios need not be extreme; an interior balance point exists and is computable by the proposed algorithms.
  • The reported optimum is consistent across the two tested objectives: ρ0*=0.28 appears in both energy-maximization and rate-maximization, suggesting a relatively robust sensing-time design rule.
  • Higher THz frequency, despite greater path loss and molecular absorption, improves harvested energy and achievable rate when gain and beam collection efficiency are included, indicating that THz bands can be attractive for ISCAP.
  • Larger transmit aperture diameters increase both E and R in the studied parameter window, providing a concrete hardware-design lever.
  • The optimization approach reduces the two-dimensional search to a one-dimensional traversal, lowering computational complexity for practical implementation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If real beam-alignment control does not follow the assumed exponential decay (e.g., it has a residual error floor or a different rate), the optimal sensing time will shift; a calibration campaign measuring lmis over time could directly refine or replace Eq. (25).
  • The same two-knob trade-off structure may extend to multi-user or RIS-assisted THz-ISCAP, but interference and coupled power constraints could break the simple monotonicity that the algorithms rely on.
  • The reported optimal ratios could serve as initialization points for adaptive, online tuning in a deployed system where channel conditions and alignment dynamics vary slowly.
  • The frequency-dependent absorption glitches observed near 184, 326, 381, and 449 GHz indicate that carrier selection should avoid these windows, which is a testable design guideline for THz-ISCAP hardware.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper considers a terahertz integrated sensing, communications and powering (THz-ISCAP) system in which a fraction ρ0 of a fixed time frame is used for sensing/beam alignment and the remaining time is used for SWIPT, with the received power split between information decoding and energy harvesting by a ratio ρ1. It models THz propagation using aperture gains, free-space/Fresnel path loss, molecular absorption, beam misalignment, Rician fading, beam collection efficiency and a nonlinear RF-to-DC conversion model. It formulates two constrained optimization problems: maximize harvested energy subject to a rate constraint and maximize rate subject to an energy constraint. Using monotonicity/unimodality arguments and divide-and-conquer/bisection algorithms, it reports numerical optima, e.g., E* = 3.63386 W·s at (ρ0*, ρ1*) = (0.28, 0.84) under R ≥ 1500 bits/Hz, and R* = 1519.1 bits/Hz at (0.28, 0.81) under E ≥ 3.5 W·s. The paper also numerically studies the effects of frequency, distance and aperture diameter.

Significance. The ISCAP concept is timely, and the paper brings together a broad set of THz channel effects, including near-field path loss, molecular absorption, nonlinear energy harvesting and beam misalignment, in a single resource-allocation formulation. If the modeling and optimization were correct, the paper would provide a useful starting point for sensing-assisted THz SWIPT design. However, several load-bearing modeling choices are either inconsistent with the cited channel models or are adopted without justification, and the reported numerical optima are therefore not reliable as they stand. The problems are identifiable and in principle correctable, but the central quantitative claims require substantial rework. The paper does not provide machine-checked proofs or reproducible code, and the analytic optimality claims are not currently established in a verifiable form.

major comments (5)
  1. [II.A.4, Eqs. (13) and (20)] In Eq. (13), hmis is taken from the pointing-error model of [34], [35], where S0 exp(-2 lmis^2 / Rebw^2) is the fraction of power collected at the receiver. Eq. (20) then multiplies by |hmis|^2, producing exp(-4 lmis^2 / Rebw^2) and S0^2. This double-counts the misalignment loss and changes the derivative with respect to ρ0, and hence the feasible sets (40)-(41) and the reported optima (E* = 3.63386 W·s at (0.28, 0.84) and R* = 1519.1 bits/Hz at (0.28, 0.81)) are all computed from an internally inconsistent received-power expression. Eq. (21) has the same problem in the reflected path. The authors should use hmis, not |hmis|^2, in (20) and (21), and then recompute all analytical and numerical results.
  2. [III.B, Eqs. (26) and (46)] In Section III.B, ρ1 is defined as the fraction of the received power used for energy harvesting. The input to the RF-to-DC converter is then ρ1Pr, so in the nonlinear model (18) the harvested DC energy should be (1 - ρ0)T fη(ρ1Pr), not (1 - ρ0)T ρ1 fη(Pr) as written in (26). The energy-constraint derivation in (46) repeats the same error by evaluating fη at the full received power and then multiplying by ρ1. Since fη is nonlinear, these expressions are not equivalent, and both the feasible region and the optimal solution change. Please correct (26) and the E ≥ Eε constraints in Section III.C.4, and recompute the affected numerical results.
  3. [III.A, Eq. (25)] The exponential decay model lmis(t) = l0 exp(-αt) is introduced as a simplification without a physical or protocol-based justification; α and l0 are effectively free parameters in Table I, and no sensitivity analysis is given. The existence and value of the optimal sensing-time ratio ρ0* are direct consequences of this assumed decay law, so the main trade-off result is not robustly established. Please either justify the model by connecting it to a specific beam-alignment/control procedure or provide sensitivity results showing how ρ0* and the rate-energy frontier change over plausible ranges of α and l0.
  4. [III.C, Eqs. (28)-(37)] The analytic derivations are not reliable in their current form. Examples include the malformed Hessian notation '∂fE^2/∂^2ρ1' in Section III.C; Eq. (36), which contains a logarithmic argument with e^{-2αρ0T} even though the expression is evaluated at ρ0 = 0; and Eq. (35), where R_ebw^2 appears in denominators that seem to belong in different factors and some terms appear to be missing factors of ln(2). Because the sign claims ∂h/∂ρ0 < 0 and h(0) > 0 are stated as 'it is found' on the basis of these garbled expressions, the claimed unimodality and the validity of the bisection/divide-and-conquer optimizers are not established. Please rewrite all partial derivatives with consistent notation and provide a step-by-step verification of the monotonicity and unimodality properties used to justify the algorithms.
  5. [III.C, Algorithms 1 and 2] Algorithms 1 and 2 are under-specified. The while loops say 'while Stopping criterion not met do' without defining the stopping criterion; lines 9-13 of Algorithm 1 contain assignments such as 'p1 ← (...) = 1', which are not well-formed; and the claim that the optimal ρ1 lies on the upper or lower boundary of the feasible sets (41), (49) or (54) is not proven. Since the paper's central claim is optimality of the reported (ρ0*, ρ1*), the algorithms need to be fully specified, and their correctness and convergence need to be argued or numerically verified.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eqs. (22) and (27)] Please clarify the unit convention for R: the expressions have the dimension of bits per second per Hz multiplied by seconds, so the reported unit 'bits/Hz' should either be justified or changed to 'bits'.
  2. [Throughout] The notation for optima is inconsistent (e.g., ρ0∗ vs. ρ0*, ρ1∗ vs. ρ1*), and some derivative expressions such as '∂fE^2/∂^2ρ1' are malformed; a consistent mathematical notation would improve readability.
  3. [Figs. 5 and 6] The captions mention 'shadow area' and specific markers (diamond, triangles, circle), but the reader must infer these from the figures; adding a legend or a more descriptive caption would make the feasible regions and the reported optima easier to verify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the optimization is self-contained against its stated channel, misalignment, and energy-harvesting models.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that jointly optimizing the sensing time ratio rho0 and the power splitting ratio rho1 maximizes the harvested energy or achievable rate under a constraint on the other. This is obtained by maximizing the explicitly stated objectives E and R in Eqs. (26) and (27), which are built from quoted channel models, the paper's own exponential misalignment model in Eq. (25), and the cited RF-to-DC conversion curve Eq. (18). The reported optima are not fitted values; they are computed by a described search over the feasible sets, e.g., Eq. (41) and Eq. (54). The misalignment decay law Eq. (25) is an explicit modeling assumption with fixed parameters (l0 = 0.8, alpha = 0.1), not a parameter fitted to the quantity being predicted, so it does not make the derivation circular. The RF-to-DC curve in Eq. (18) is cited from prior work, including a work sharing an author, but it is an externally stated component model with fixed constants, not a result whose derivation depends on the present paper's claim; therefore it does not constitute load-bearing circularity. A separate physical-modeling concern, that Eq. (20) squares the misalignment coefficient hmis from Eq. (13) even though hmis already represents a power-collection fraction, is a correctness or modeling-consistency issue, not a circularity issue. No step of the derivation reduces by construction to its own inputs, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are simulation inputs and a curve-fitted conversion model. The main modeling additions are the exponential misalignment decay law and the assembly of existing THz channel models into one system.

free parameters (3)
  • Exponential misalignment decay rate alpha = 0.1 (Table I)
    Chosen by hand to make the alignment converge in tens of seconds; no measurement or protocol justifies this value.
  • Initial misalignment error l0 = 0.8 (Table I)
    Assumed initial beam-pointing error; no experimental basis given.
  • RF-to-DC conversion constants a0,b0,c0 = 0.3929, 0.01675, 0.04401 (Table I, from [42])
    These are curve-fitted constants from a cited prior paper, used as inputs here; the nonlinear efficiency model is quoted, not re-derived.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Free-space path loss and Friis antenna gain formulas apply at 100-450 GHz
    Used in Section II.A to define G and PL(d); standard but relies on the cited far-field/near-field models.
  • domain assumption Misalignment fading is a Gaussian-beam pointing error model with hmis = S0 e^{-2 lmis^2 / Rebw^2}
    Taken from [24],[34],[35],[36]; the exponential decay of lmis with time is added here as Eq. (25) with no derivation.
  • domain assumption The channel has a LoS path and Rician fading with K=1
    Section II.A.5; K=1 is a parameter choice in Table I, not measured.
  • standard math The beam collection efficiency eta_b = 1 - e^{-A_tx A_rx / (lambda^2 d^2)}
    Quoted from [40],[41]; accepted in the literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Terahertz Integrated Sensing Communications and Powering for 6G Wireless Networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4HIIGCCW

@misc{pith2026250113006,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Terahertz Integrated Sensing Communications and Powering for 6G Wireless Networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4HIIGCCW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13006}
}
read the original abstract

The terahertz (THz) band has attracted significant interest for future wireless networks. In this paper, a THz integrated sensing communications and powering (THz-ISCAP) system, where sensing is leveraged to enhance communications and powering, is studied. For a given total amount of time, we aim to determine an optimal time allocation for sensing to improve the efficiency of communications and powering, along with an optimal power splitting ratio to balance these two functionalities. This is achieved by maximizing between communications and powering either the achievable rate or harvested energy while ensuring a minimum requirement on the other. Numerical results indicate that the optimal system performance can be achieved by jointly optimizing the sensing time allocation and the power splitting ratio. Additionally, the results reveal the effects of various factors, such as THz frequencies and antenna aperture sizes, on the system performance. This study provides some interesting results to offer a new perspective for the research on THz-ISCAP.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.13006 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. System diagram for THz integrated sensing, commu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Sensing for alignment. III. PROBLEM FORMULATION AND SOLUTIONS In this section, we will study the performance trade￾off among THz sensing, communications and powering. As mentioned before, the proposed THz-ISCAP scheme can be described in two phases, i.e., sensing and SWIPT. Within a fixed time T, ρ0T (0 ≤ ρ0 ≤ 1) is allocated for sensing and (1 − ρ0)T for the SWIPT, where ρ0 is the time allocation ratio between the … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. E and R vs ρ0T with ρ1 = 0.5. part of the figure, it shows the same trend as the received RF power in the first 33 s, but it decreases to 0. This is because the harvested energy increases with the received RF power. However, when the sensing time reaches 100 s, there is no time left for harvesting. This is why the received energy becomes 0 in the end. As a result, the balance between sensing in the first phase and c… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Pr and E versus ρ0T. To solve (P2-1) or (P2-2), the same method, including com￾plexity analysis, as solving (P1) can be used. Details are summarized in Algorithm 2. IV. NUMERICAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In this section, simulation results are presented to show the perfo…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Maximize E with R ≥ Rϵ. point of the subset area. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: E vs d 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 d (m) 0 5 10 15 E (w*s) 1 = 0.5 f = 60 GHz f = 100 GHz f = 300 GHz 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 d (m) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 R (bits/Hz) 1 = 0.5 f = 60 GHz f = 100 GHz f = 300 GHz [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: E and R vs d. f leads to a wider FZ region [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: hmis and Rd vs Dbs−t. 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 Dbs-t (m) 0 5 10 15 E (W*s) 1 = 0.5 f = 60 GHz f = 100 GHz f = 300 GHz 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 Dbs-t (m) 500 1000 1500 2000 R (bits/Hz) 1 = 0.5 f = 60 GHz f = 100 GHz f = 300 GHz [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/ful…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: E and R vs Dbs−t. the figure, the aperture diameters of the BS and the receiver are set in the ranges of 0.1 m to 0.4 m and 0.2 m to 0.8 m, ρ0 = 0.4, ρ1 = 0.5, and d = 20 m. In the upper part of the figure, one can see that hmis increases with Dbs−t. This is because w…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [34]

    Outage capacity optimization for free-space optical links with pointing errors,

    A. A. Farid and S. Hranilovic, “Outage capacity optimization for free-space optical links with pointing errors,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1702–1710, Jul. 2007

    work page 2007

  2. [35]

    Analytical performance assessment of THz wireless systems,

    A. A. A. Boulogeorgos, E. N. Papasotiriou, and A. Alexiou, “Analytical performance assessment of THz wireless systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 11436–11453, 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [1]

    The Evolution of Applications, Hardware Design, and Channel Modeling for Terahertz (THz) Band Communications and Sensing: Ready for 6G?,

    J. M. Jornet et al., “The Evolution of Applications, Hardware Design, and Channel Modeling for Terahertz (THz) Band Communications and Sensing: Ready for 6G?,” Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 1–32, Jul. 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [2]

    Terahertz Communications and Sensing for 6G and Beyond: A Comprehensive Review,

    W. Jiang et al., “Terahertz Communications and Sensing for 6G and Beyond: A Comprehensive Review,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, pp. 1–1, Jul. 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [3]

    Wireless Power Transfer via Subterahertz-Wave,

    S. Mizojiri and K. Shimamura, “Wireless Power Transfer via Subterahertz-Wave,” Applied Sciences 2018 , V ol. 8, Page 2653, vol. 8, no. 12, p. 2653, Dec. 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [4]

    Self-Sustainable Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Aided Simultaneous Terahertz Infor- mation and Power Transfer (STIPT),

    Y . Pan, K. Wang, C. Pan, H. Zhu, and J. Wang, “Self-Sustainable Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Aided Simultaneous Terahertz Infor- mation and Power Transfer (STIPT),” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 5420–5434, Jul. 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [5]

    Wireless Information and Energy Transfer in the Era of 6G Communications,

    C. Psomas et al., “Wireless Information and Energy Transfer in the Era of 6G Communications,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 764–804, Jul. 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [6]

    Recent progress of wireless power trans- fer via Sub-THz wave,

    S. Mizojiri and K. Shimamura, “Recent progress of wireless power trans- fer via Sub-THz wave,” Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference Proceedings, APMC, vol. 2019-December, pp. 705–707, Dec. 2019

    work page 2019

Show all 43 references
  1. [7]

    Terahertz-Based Joint Communication and Sensing for Precision Agri- culture: A 6G Use-Case,

    M. Usman, S. Ansari, A. Taha, A. Zahid, Q. H. Abbasi, and M. A. Imran, “Terahertz-Based Joint Communication and Sensing for Precision Agri- culture: A 6G Use-Case,” Frontiers in Communications and Networks, vol. 3, p. 836506, Mar. 2022

    2022

  2. [8]

    Terahertz Sensing and Communication Towards Future Intelligence Connected Networks,

    G. Wang et al., “Terahertz Sensing and Communication Towards Future Intelligence Connected Networks,” Huawei, Sep. 2022. [Online]. Avail- able: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:264149367

    2022

  3. [9]

    Terahertz Near-Field Communications and Sensing,

    Z. Wang, X. Mu, and Y . Liu, “Terahertz Near-Field Communications and Sensing,” arXiv:2306.09723, Jun. 2023

    2023 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Integrated Sensing and Communications in Terahertz Systems: A Theoretical Perspective,

    Z. Liu, C. Yang, and M. Peng, “Integrated Sensing and Communications in Terahertz Systems: A Theoretical Perspective,” IEEE Network, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 194–201, May 2024

    2024

  5. [11]

    Integrated Sensing and Communications for 6G: Prospects and Challenges of Using THz Radios,

    T. Gan, S. Dang, X. Li, and Z. Zhang, “Integrated Sensing and Communications for 6G: Prospects and Challenges of Using THz Radios,” in 2024 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), IEEE, Apr. 2024, pp. 1–6

    2024

  6. [12]

    THz ISAC: A Physical- Layer Perspective of Terahertz Integrated Sensing and Communication,

    C. Han, Y . Wu, Z. Chen, Y . Chen and G. Wang, “THz ISAC: A Physical- Layer Perspective of Terahertz Integrated Sensing and Communication,” in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 102-108, Feb. 2024

    2024

  7. [13]

    Integrated Sensing and Communications With Joint Beam-Squint and Beam-Split for mmWave/THz Massive MIMO,

    F. Gao, L. Xu, and S. Ma, “Integrated Sensing and Communications With Joint Beam-Squint and Beam-Split for mmWave/THz Massive MIMO,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 2963–2976, May 2023

    2023

  8. [14]

    ISAC- Enabled Beam Alignment for Terahertz Networks: Scheme Design and Coverage Analysis,

    W. Chen, L. Li, Z. Chen, Y . Liu, B. Ning, and T. Quek, “ISAC- Enabled Beam Alignment for Terahertz Networks: Scheme Design and Coverage Analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2024.3441534. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON XXX XXX, VOL. XX, NO. X, DECEMBER 2024 12

    2024

  9. [15]

    Coverage and Capacity Analysis for Terahertz Integrated Sensing and Communication Networks,

    Y . Wu and C. Han, “Coverage and Capacity Analysis for Terahertz Integrated Sensing and Communication Networks,” in ICC 2024 - IEEE International Conference on Communications, IEEE, Jun. 2024, pp. 3555–3560

    2024

  10. [16]

    Terahertz- Band Integrated Sensing and Communications: Challenges and Opportu- nities,

    A. M. Elbir, K. V . Mishra, S. Chatzinotas, and M. Bennis, “Terahertz- Band Integrated Sensing and Communications: Challenges and Opportu- nities,” arXiv:2208.01235v2, Oct. 2024

    2024 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer in Terahertz Ultra-Massive MIMO Systems,

    Z. Yang, Y . Wu, and C. Han, “Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer in Terahertz Ultra-Massive MIMO Systems,” IEEE Inter- national Conference on Communications, vol. 2023-May, pp. 913–918, 2023

    2023

  12. [18]

    Information Rate-Harvested Power Trade- off in THz SWIPT Systems Employing Resonant Tunnelling Diode- based EH Circuits,

    N. Shanin, S. Clochiatti, K. M. Mayer, L. Cottatellucci, N. Weimann, and R. Schobe, “Information Rate-Harvested Power Trade- off in THz SWIPT Systems Employing Resonant Tunnelling Diode- based EH Circuits,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3442708

  13. [19]

    Average Harvested Power in THz WPT Systems Em- ploying Resonant-Tunnelling Diodes,

    N. Shanin, S. Clochiatti, K. M. Mayer, L. Cottatellucci, N. Weimann, and R. Schober, “Average Harvested Power in THz WPT Systems Em- ploying Resonant-Tunnelling Diodes,” 2023 6th International Workshop on Mobile Terahertz Systems, IWMTS 2023, 2023

    2023

  14. [20]

    ISAC Meets SWIPT: Multi- Functional Wireless Systems Integrating Sensing, Communication, and Powering,

    Y . Chen, H. Hua, J. Xu, and D. W. K. Ng, “ISAC Meets SWIPT: Multi- Functional Wireless Systems Integrating Sensing, Communication, and Powering,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 8264–8280, Aug. 2024

    2024

  15. [21]

    Integrating Sensing, Communication, and Power Transfer: From Theory to Practice,

    X. Li et al., “Integrating Sensing, Communication, and Power Transfer: From Theory to Practice,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 122–127, Sep. 2024

    2024

  16. [22]

    Integrating Sensing, Communication, and Power Transfer: Multiuser Beamforming Design,

    Z. Zhou, X. Li, G. Zhu, J. Xu, K. Huang, and S. Cui, “Integrating Sensing, Communication, and Power Transfer: Multiuser Beamforming Design,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 2228–2242, Sep. 2024

    2024

  17. [23]

    Simultaneous Terahertz Imaging With Information and Power Transfer (STIIPT),

    A. Hanif and M. Doroslova ˇcki, “Simultaneous Terahertz Imaging With Information and Power Transfer (STIIPT),” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 806–818, Jul. 2023

    2023

  18. [24]

    Integrated Scheduling of Sensing, Communication, and Control for mmWave/THz Communications in Cellular Connected UA V Networks,

    B. Chang, W. Tang, X. Yan, X. Tong, and Z. Chen, “Integrated Scheduling of Sensing, Communication, and Control for mmWave/THz Communications in Cellular Connected UA V Networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 2103–2113, Jul. 2022

    2022

  19. [25]

    IEEE Standard for Definitions of Terms for Antennas,

    “IEEE Standard for Definitions of Terms for Antennas,” in IEEE Std 145-2013 (Revision of IEEE Std 145-1993) , pp.1-50, 6 March 2014

    2013

  20. [26]

    Integrated Communications and Sensing in Terahertz Band: A Propagation Channel Perspective,

    A. Hrovat, A. Simon ˇciˇc, T. Kocevska, G. Morano, A. ˇSvigelj, and T. Javornik, “Integrated Communications and Sensing in Terahertz Band: A Propagation Channel Perspective,” Journal of Communications Software and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 23–37, 2024

    2024

  21. [27]

    Study of the feasibility of using microwave power transfer for dynamic wireless electric vehicle charging,

    I. Ahmed, E. A. Elghanam, M. S. Hassan, and A. Osman, “Study of the feasibility of using microwave power transfer for dynamic wireless electric vehicle charging,” 2020 IEEE Transportation Electrification Con- ference and Expo, ITEC 2020 , pp. 365–370, Jun. 2020

    2020

  22. [28]

    Near-Field Gain Expression for Aperture Antenna and Its Application,

    L. Xiao, Y . Xie, P. Wu, and J. Li, “Near-Field Gain Expression for Aperture Antenna and Its Application,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1225–1229, Jul. 2021

    2021

  23. [29]

    Near- Field Communications: A Tutorial Review,

    Y . Liu, Z. Wang, J. Xu, C. Ouyang, X. Mu, and R. Schober, “Near- Field Communications: A Tutorial Review,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 4, pp. 1999–2049, 2023

    1999

  24. [30]

    Generalised correction to the Friis formula: quick determination of the coupling in the Fresnel region,

    I. Kim, S. Xu, and Y . Rahmat-Samii, “Generalised correction to the Friis formula: quick determination of the coupling in the Fresnel region,” IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation , vol. 7, no. 13, pp. 1092–1101, Oct. 2013

    2013

  25. [31]

    Channel modeling and capacity analysis for electromagnetic wireless nanonetworks in the terahertz band,

    J. M. Jornet and I. F. Akyildiz, “Channel modeling and capacity analysis for electromagnetic wireless nanonetworks in the terahertz band,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 3211–3221, Oct. 2011

    2011

  26. [32]

    A line-of-sight channel model for the 100–450 gigahertz frequency band,

    J. Kokkoniemi, J. Lehtom ¨aki, and M. Juntti, “A line-of-sight channel model for the 100–450 gigahertz frequency band,” Eurasip Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking , vol. 2021, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Dec. 2021

    2021

  27. [33]

    Recommendation ITU-R P.676-13: Attenuation by atmospheric gases and related effects, ITU-R Std., Aug. 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    An Overview of Signal Processing Techniques for Terahertz Communications,

    H. Sarieddeen, M. S. Alouini, and T. Y . Al-Naffouri, “An Overview of Signal Processing Techniques for Terahertz Communications,” Proceed- ings of the IEEE, vol. 109, no. 10, pp. 1628–1665, Oct. 2021

    2021

  29. [37]

    On the Joint Effect of Rain and Beam Misalignment in Terahertz Wireless Systems,

    A. A. A. Boulogeorgos, J. M. Riera, and A. Alexiou, “On the Joint Effect of Rain and Beam Misalignment in Terahertz Wireless Systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 58997–59012, 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Fundamentals of Photonics,

    B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, “Fundamentals of Photonics,” Wiley, Aug. 1991, doi: 10.1002/0471213748

    1991 doi

  31. [39]

    Terahertz Channel Propagation Phenomena, Measurement Techniques and Mod- eling for 6G Wireless Communication Applications: A Survey, Open Challenges and Future Research Directions,

    D. Serghiou, M. Khalily, T. W. C. Brown, and R. Tafazolli, “Terahertz Channel Propagation Phenomena, Measurement Techniques and Mod- eling for 6G Wireless Communication Applications: A Survey, Open Challenges and Future Research Directions,” IEEE Communications Surveys and Tut...

    1957

  32. [40]

    Microwave and Millimeter Wave Power Beaming,

    C. T. Rodenbeck et al., “Microwave and Millimeter Wave Power Beaming,” IEEE Journal of Microwaves, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 229–259, Jan. 2021

    2021

  33. [41]

    Quasi-Optical Techniques,

    P. F. Goldsmith, “Quasi-Optical Techniques,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 80, no. 11, pp. 1729–1747, 1992

    1992

  34. [42]

    Wireless Energy Harvesting Using Signals from Multiple Fading Channels,

    Y . Chen, N. Zhao, and M. S. Alouini, “Wireless Energy Harvesting Using Signals from Multiple Fading Channels,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 5027–5039, Nov. 2017

    2017

  35. [43]

    RF-based Energy Harvesting: Nonlinear Models, Applications and Challenges,

    R. Jiang, “RF-based Energy Harvesting: Nonlinear Models, Applications and Challenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04976v1 , May, 2024

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.