Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 81 references

Modeling elasto-viscoplastic free-surface flows with different yield surfaces

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Under the right parameter regime, modified Cam-clay reproduces Drucker-Prager flow without the volume blow-up.

desk verdict Useful EVP comparison with a genuinely new analytic benchmark, but the MCC-to-DP claim rests on a heuristic that needs tightening. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.17380 v1 pith:4I5MRBMS submitted 2026-07-19 cs.CE physics.flu-dyn

Lars Blatny , Alexandre Pellet This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CEphysics.flu-dyn
keywords Elasto-viscoplasticflowsFree-surfaceYieldsurfacesOverstressmodelModifiedCam-clayDrucker-PragerFinitestrainMaterialpointmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out a single finite-strain, overstress-type elasto-viscoplastic framework that can host any of three yield surfaces—pressure-independent, frictional, and capped—and compares how each behaves in free-surface flows. Its central claim is that the capped modified Cam–clay model, given a small initial compressive strength and a sufficiently fast hardening law, drives plastic states to the critical-state line and therefore reproduces the frictional Drucker–Prager solution while eliminating the troublesome volume expansion that Drucker–Prager produces under large deformation. A sympathetic reader would care because this turns a geotechnical constitutive model into a practical, volume-stable substitute for Drucker–Prager in yield-stress fluid simulations, removing the need for a special cone-tip projection and its spurious dilatancy. The paper also derives analytic steady-state velocity profiles for the two overstress variants and shows that one of them contains the familiar granular-flow velocity profile as a special case. The equivalence claim is demonstrated numerically for shear flow, dam break, and stretching flows, not proven from the constitutive equations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the modified Cam–clay yield surface, an ellipse in the pressure–shear-stress plane defined by τy(p) = µ sqrt((p − pt)(pc − p)), where pc is an isotropic compressive strength that hardens as pc(εP_V) = p0_c exp(−ξ εP_V) with accumulated plastic volumetric strain εP_V. A sufficiently stiff hardening law and small initial pc force stress states toward the apex of the ellipse, which lies on the critical state line of slope µ—exactly where Drucker–Prager plastic states would sit. Surrounding that is the paper's finite-strain overstress framework with a non-associative deviatoric plastic potential, which lets all three yield surfaces share one elastic predictor–plastic c

What would settle it

Run an inclined-shear-flow simulation with the modified Cam–clay model using a small hardening parameter ξ or an initial pc comparable to the gravitational confining pressure. If the steady-state velocity profile still matches the Drucker–Prager analytic solution while volume stays constant, the claim is robust; if the profile departs or the material compacts noticeably, the circumvention fails outside the tuned regime. The paper's own figures already show such departure when pc and β are increased, so the decisive test is to map the boundary of the matching regime in (pc, ξ) space.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the singularity of the Drucker–Prager yield surface—the cone tip that forces a special, volume-increasing return mapping—can be sidestepped without changing the observable flow solution. By replacing Drucker–Prager with the modified Cam–clay yield surface and choosing a large hardening parameter ξ and a small initial compressive strength pc, the plastic stress states remain close to the critical state line set by the friction slope µ. In that regime the model behaves as an effective Drucker–Prager fluid, matching the analytic inclined-plane velocity profile and the dam-break runout in the paper's tests, while the capped yield surface pe

Load-bearing premise

The whole circumvention rests on the heuristic that a small initial compressive strength pc and a large hardening parameter ξ keep plastic states near the critical state line; the paper verifies this numerically for the studied flows and parameter sets but does not derive it from the constitutive equations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claimed equivalence holds, modified Cam–clay can replace Drucker–Prager in elasto-viscoplastic free-surface flow simulations, giving the same velocity profiles and runout without the special cone-tip volume correction.
  • The uncorrected Drucker–Prager model is unsafe for large-deformation flows: in the paper's stretching test it gains roughly 50% volume, while corrected Drucker–Prager and modified Cam–clay stay close in volume.
  • The cone-tip correction technique and the modified Cam-clay model give almost identical volumetric behavior in the tested flows, so the correction is a viable alternative when a Cam-clay parameter set is not available.
  • The analytic velocity profiles provide ready verification targets: the projection-type overstress variant with exponent s = 2 reduces to a familiar granular-flow profile, linking the framework to granular rheology.
  • Yield surface choice, not just yield stress, controls plug formation and compressibility in the simulations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The equivalence between Cam-clay and Drucker-Prager is a tuned-regime statement, not a material equivalence: outside the small-pc, large-ξ regime, Cam-clay intentionally produces different, more compressible flows, so practitioners should treat parameter selection as part of the model definition.
  • A natural next test is to calibrate the hardening law ξ against measured compaction in a collapsing column or debris flow; the paper's framework predicts that the volume-change history discriminates between corrected Drucker-Prager and Cam-clay even when final runout matches.
  • Because the constitutive framework is not tied to the particular particle method used here, the same yield-surface comparison could be reproduced in any large-deformation continuum solver, which would test whether the Drucker-Prager-to-Cam-clay equivalence is numerical-scheme independent.
  • For yield-stress fluids whose elastic response matters at startup, the framework suggests that a capped surface may regularize both the solid-fluid transition and the pressure singularity simultaneously, a combination not offered by the uncapped frictional surface.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a finite-strain overstress elasto-viscoplastic framework accommodating von Mises, Drucker–Prager, and modified Cam–clay yield surfaces, implemented in the material point method. It derives analytic steady-state velocity profiles for inclined-plane flow for Peric and Duvaut–Lions overstress models, notes a connection to the Bagnold profile for s=2, introduces a volume-correction technique for the Drucker–Prager cone-tip projection, and proposes that modified Cam–clay with small initial compressive strength and large hardening can retrieve Drucker–Prager behavior while avoiding spurious volume increase. Numerical benchmarks cover inclined-plane profiles, dam breaks, stretching flows, and energy/resolution convergence.

Significance. If substantiated, the proposed use of modified Cam–clay as a volume-stable regularization of Drucker–Prager would be practically useful for free-surface elasto-viscoplastic flow simulations. The paper’s strengths include analytic benchmark profiles that are used as independent references, an open-source implementation, clear numerical comparisons, and a useful discussion of the Drucker–Prager volume-expansion problem. However, the central MCC-to-DP equivalence currently rests on an unproven heuristic supported only by a narrow set of numerical experiments; the claimed retrieval is therefore not yet established as a property of the model. The paper is transparent about this limitation, but the abstract and conclusions state the result more strongly than the evidence supports.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1 and Abstract] The central claim that modified Cam–clay ‘retrieves’ the Drucker–Prager solution rests on the heuristic that with p0_c small and ξ large, plastic states reside around the critical state line. This is not derived. For the inclined-plane benchmark the stress state satisfies τ/p = tan θ (0.839 for θ=40°), while the critical-state slope is µ=tan30°=0.577; overstress states are necessarily above the critical-state line, so the stated mechanism cannot be ‘residing on the critical state line.’ The operative mechanism must instead be that the ellipse apex tracks the current mean stress (pc ≈ 2p) through Eq. (10). No timescale, error estimate, or distinguished limit is given for this tracking. Please replace the heuristic with an analysis, or at least a quantified convergence study in (p0_c, ξ), and state its regime of validity. As written, the abstract’s claim is an observation for selected para
  2. [Fig. 6 and §4.2] The numerical evidence for DP–MCC equivalence covers a narrow window: one flow geometry (infinite inclined plane), one set of elastic parameters, and no systematic variation of (p0_c, ξ). Figs. 6b/c show departure when pc or β is increased, but no quantitative criterion for acceptable agreement is given. In the dam-break comparison (§4.2), the statement that DP, DP-corr., and MCC show ‘no significant difference’ is not quantified (e.g., by runout distance, final shape, or material-distribution metric). Please add a quantitative agreement measure and a parameter-space scan that delineates the ‘right conditions’ claimed in the abstract.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (19)] The condition stated after Eq. (19), ‘we must assume µ > tan(θ) for flow’, appears to have the wrong inequality. For the non-cohesive DP model, the overstress ratio is τ/τ_y = tanθ/µ (Eq. (25)); sustained flow requires µ < tanθ, and the simulations use µ=tan30° with θ=40° (µ<tanθ). If µ>tanθ, hy from Eq. (18) lies above the free surface and the shear stress never reaches yield. This typo should be corrected; it does not affect the simulations but obscures the benchmark setup.
  2. [§2.1/§4.1] The initial compressive strength is defined as p0_c in Eq. (10) but denoted pc in §4.1 and Fig. 6. Please make the notation consistent or explicitly state that pc in §4.1 is the initial value.
  3. [Fig. 10 caption] The caption contains a garbled phrase: ‘as described in from Section 4.3’ should be ‘as described in Section 4.3’.
  4. [§5] The discussion states that Cam–clay models ‘can also be used (with other parameter choices) to produce very different results’ than Drucker–Prager. This is acknowledged, but it would help to give one concrete example (e.g., a parameter regime where MCC behaves as a capped compressible model rather than as a regularized DP cone) so that the reader can calibrate the scope of the claimed equivalence.
  5. [Fig. 11] The statement that corrected Drucker–Prager and modified Cam–clay give ‘almost identical volumetric behavior’ is visual. Reporting the maximum relative volume difference, or plotting the two curves with a shared quantitative scale, would make the claim precise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: analytic velocity profiles are independently derived; the MCC-to-DP retrieval is a numerical verification of an explicitly stated limiting heuristic, not a fit renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central derivations are self-contained: the inclined-plane velocity profiles (Eqs. 20-25) are obtained in closed form from the stated constitutive equations and then used as independent benchmarks for the MPM simulations; no parameter is fitted to the simulation results. The MCC-to-DP claim rests on the heuristic in Section 4.1 that with sufficiently small p_c^0 and sufficiently large xi, plastic states reside near the critical state line. This is explicitly framed as a proposal ('we propose') and checked numerically against the independently derived cohesionless Drucker-Prager solution, rather than being extracted from a fit. The self-citations (Blatny & Gaume 2025a,b for the Matter MPM code; Blatny et al. 2024 for the hardening law and the elastic-plastic update derivation) supply implementation details and model ingredients that are restated in the paper; they are not invoked to forbid alternatives or to import an unverified uniqueness claim. The paper also openly states its support gaps ('There is no general analytical solution...'; 'We have not studied the influence of elastic properties...'; compressible Cam-clay behavior is 'beyond the scope'), which are scope/justification limitations, not circular reductions. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction, and the Bagnold-profile remark is presented as a mathematical resemblance to an existing result, not as a derivation of that result. Overall, the derivation chain does not reduce to its inputs, so circularity is minimal.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central mathematical content is the analytic velocity profiles and the numerical comparisons; both rely on standard viscoplasticity and elasticity assumptions rather than new physics. The MCC-DP equivalence additionally depends on the hand-tuned parameters pc and ξ and a heuristic limiting argument, which are the main ad hoc elements.

free parameters (2)
  • pc (initial compressive strength for MCC) = 10 Pa in §4.1 simulations
    Chosen small to approach the Drucker-Prager critical-state limit; the paper states 'sufficiently small' values are needed to retrieve DP, so this parameter is tuned by hand to make the equivalence work.
  • ξ (hardening parameter for MCC) = 10^3 in §4.1 simulations (and 10^2 in dam-break/stretching examples)
    Chosen large to drive stress states rapidly to the critical state line; explicitly described as a deliberate choice to compare with Drucker-Prager.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Multiplicative decomposition F = F_E F_P (Lee, 1969)
    Invoked in §2.1 as the basis for the finite-strain framework; standard in finite-strain plasticity but a modeling choice.
  • domain assumption Hencky hyperelasticity (Eq. 2)
    Relates Kirchhoff stress to elastic Hencky strain; standard but restricts the elasticity to an isotropic linear form.
  • domain assumption Overstress viscoplasticity (Perzyna, Duvaut-Lions, Eqs. 11-17)
    The rate-dependent flow rule is adopted rather than a consistency approach; the paper notes the two can be equivalent.
  • domain assumption Hydrostatic stress and simple-shear assumptions in §2.3 (τ = ρg(h−z) sinθ, p = ρg(h−z) cosθ, ˙γ = ∂v_x/∂z)
    Used to derive the analytic velocity profiles; these hold for a long incline with a free surface and no lateral variations.
  • ad hoc to paper Critical-state-limit heuristic for MCC (§4.1)
    The paper proposes that small pc and large ξ confine plastic states to the critical state line, but this is not proven; it is the key premise behind the MCC-DP equivalence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modeling elasto-viscoplastic free-surface flows with different yield surfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4I5MRBMS

@misc{pith2026260717380,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modeling elasto-viscoplastic free-surface flows with different yield surfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4I5MRBMS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.17380}
}
read the original abstract

Elasto-viscoplasticity provides a unified way of describing yield-stress fluids which may exhibit both solid-like and fluid-like behavior. In this work, we present a finite strain overstress-type elasto-viscoplastic framework designed to facilitate the incorporation of different yield surfaces. Within this framework, we compare several yield-surface choices and assess the associated challenges. We consider three representative yield surfaces: (i) pressure-independent, (ii) pressure-sensitive frictional and (iii) capped surfaces, corresponding to von Mises, Drucker--Prager, and modified Cam--clay models, respectively. In the case of von Mises, the proposed formulation naturally recovers the well-known Bingham and Herschel--Bulkley rheologies which are characterized by a single critical yield stress. We discuss in detail the singularity of the Drucker--Prager yield surface which requires a special treatment. In particular, we show that the modified Cam--clay model can be used to conveniently circumvent this singularity under the right conditions, retrieving the expected solution of Drucker--Prager. Implemented within a hybrid Eulerian--Lagrangian scheme, the general framework presented here enables efficient simulations of elasto-viscoplastic flows in two or three spatial dimensions, not requiring regularizing the solid-fluid transition nor a separate free-surface treatment. Numerical benchmark simulations illustrate how yield surface geometry affects velocity profiles, plug formation and compressibility.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.17380 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Yield surfaces: (a) von Mises, (b) Drucker–Prager and (c) modified Cam–clay. isotropic tensile strength. Following Gaume et al. (2018), we define β ≥ 0 as a dimensionless measure of cohesion such that pt = −βpc. Based on critical state soil mechan￾ics (Schofield and Wroth, 1968), this model is conceived from the idea that there exists a critical state where the material can continue to shear without further changes … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Sketch of velocity profile in a plugged surface flow. 2.3 Steady-state velocity profiles We consider here the flow on an inclined plane, as sketched in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The Drucker–Prager volume correction approach of Pradhana (2017) sketched in principal stress space. The solid and dashed lines represent the original and shifted Drucker– Prager yield surface, respectively. After shifting the yield, the green area represents the new elastic region while the red and blue areas are the new plastic regions, where in the latter there is no plastic volumetric deformation. The arrows rep… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Steady-state velocity profiles from the Peric model on a θ = 40◦ inclination, using (a)-(c) von Mises yield and (d)- (f) Drucker–Prager. The circles are simulation results and the black solid lines represent the analytic solution. The black cross indicates the onset of…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Steady-state velocity profiles from the Duvaut–Lions model using the modified Cam–clay on a θ = 40◦ inclination. The circles are simulation results and the black solid lines rep￾resent the cohesionless analytic solution assuming all states lie on the critical state lin…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Dam break, initially 7 × 5 cm, released on an in￾clination θ = 10◦ using modified Cam–clay with parameters µ = tan(30◦), β = 0, pc = 10 Pa, ξ = 102 , E = 1 MPa and ν = 0.3. The plotted runout distance is here normalized by the initial height h0. 0 5 y (cm) t = 0.0 s DP…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Energy and convergence of the MCC dam break from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Dam break, initially 7 × 5 cm, released on an inclination θ = 10◦. Three cases corresponding to Drucker– Prager (DP), Drucker–Prager with volume correction (DP￾corr.) and modified Cam–clay (MCC) are compared, with pa￾rameters µ = tan(30◦), β = 0, pc = 10 Pa and ξ = 102…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: A material flowing over a "cliff" and impacting the ground, as described in from Section 4.3, here simulated with the Drucker–Prager model. Initial dimensions of the material are 7 × 5 × 4 cm. The parameters used are E = 1 MPa, ν = 0.3, µ = tan(30◦), β = 0, pc = 200 P…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , author Jossic, L

    author Ahonguio, F. , author Jossic, L. , author Magnin, A. , author Dufour, F. , year 2016 . title Flow of an elasto-viscoplastic fluid around a flat plate: Experimental and numerical data . journal Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics volume 238 , pages 131--139 . :10.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.07.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.07.010 2016

  2. [2]

    , author Cochard, S

    author Ancey, C. , author Cochard, S. , year 2009 . title The dam-break problem for Herschel -- Bulkley viscoplastic fluids down steep flumes . journal Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics volume 158 , pages 18--35 . :10.1016/j.jnnfm.2008.08.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2008.08.008 2009

  3. [3]

    , author Forterre, Y

    author Andreotti, B. , author Forterre, Y. , author Pouliquen, O. , year 2013 . title Granular Media: Between Fluid and Solid . publisher Cambridge University Press , address Cambridge

    2013

  4. [4]

    , author Hewitt, D

    author Balmforth, N. , author Hewitt, D. , year 2025 . title The implications of a fluid yield stress . journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics volume 1011 , pages P1 . :10.1017/jfm.2025.343

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2025.343 2025

  5. [5]

    , author Frigaard, I.A

    author Balmforth, N.J. , author Frigaard, I.A. , author Ovarlez, G. , year 2014 . title Yielding to Stress : Recent Developments in Viscoplastic Fluid Mechanics . journal Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics volume 46 , pages 121--146 . :10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141424

    doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141424 2014

  6. [6]

    , author Gray, J.M.N.T

    author Barker, T. , author Gray, J.M.N.T. , year 2017 . title Partial regularisation of the incompressible ( I )-rheology for granular flow . journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics volume 828 , pages 5--32 . :10.1017/jfm.2017.428

    doi:10.1017/jfm.2017.428 2017

  7. [7]

    , author Schaeffer, D.G

    author Barker, T. , author Schaeffer, D.G. , author Shearer, M. , author Gray, J.M.N.T. , year 2017 . title Well-posed continuum equations for granular flow with compressibility and ( I )-rheology . journal Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences volume 473 , pages 20160846 . :10.1098/rspa.2016.0846

    arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    , year 1922

    author Bingham, E. , year 1922 . title Fluidity and Plasticity . publisher McGraw-Hill

    1922

Show all 81 references
  1. [9]

    , author Mitsoulis, E

    author Blackery, J. , author Mitsoulis, E. , year 1997 . title Creeping motion of a sphere in tubes filled with a Bingham plastic material . journal Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics volume 70 , pages 59--77 . :10.1016/S0377-0257(96)01536-4

    1997 doi

  2. [10]

    , author Gaume, J

    author Blatny, L. , author Gaume, J. , year 2025 a. title Matter . howpublished GitHub, https://github.com/larsblatny/matter . :10.5281/ZENODO.15052338

    2025 doi

  3. [11]

    , author Gaume, J

    author Blatny, L. , author Gaume, J. , year 2025 b. title Matter (v1): An open-source MPM solver for granular matter . journal Geoscientific Model Development volume 18 , pages 9149--9166 . :10.5194/gmd-18-9149-2025

    2025 doi

  4. [12]

    , author Gray, J

    author Blatny, L. , author Gray, J. , author Gaume, J. , year 2024 . title A critical state ( I )-rheology model for cohesive granular flows . journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics volume 997 , pages A67 . :10.1017/jfm.2024.643

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    , author Wood, R.D

    author Bonet, J. , author Wood, R.D. , year 2008 . title Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis . edition 2nd ed., publisher Cambridge University Press , address Cambridge

    2008

  6. [14]

    , author Denn, M.M

    author Bonn, D. , author Denn, M.M. , author Berthier, L. , author Divoux, T. , author Manneville, S. , year 2017 . title Yield stress materials in soft condensed matter . journal Reviews of Modern Physics volume 89 , pages 035005 . :10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035005

    2017 doi

  7. [15]

    , author Xiao, H

    author Bruhns, O. , author Xiao, H. , author Meyers, A. , year 1999 . title Self-consistent Eulerian rate type elasto-plasticity models based upon the logarithmic stress rate . journal International Journal of Plasticity volume 15 , pages 479--520 . :10.1016/S0749-6419(99)00003-0

    1999 doi

  8. [16]

    , author Bouvarel, R

    author Chambon, G. , author Bouvarel, R. , author Laigle, D. , author Naaim, M. , year 2011 . title Numerical simulations of granular free-surface flows using smoothed particle hydrodynamics . journal Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics volume 166 , pages 698--712 . :10.1...

    2011 doi

  9. [17]

    , author Saramito, P

    author Cheddadi, I. , author Saramito, P. , year 2013 . title A new operator splitting algorithm for elastoviscoplastic flow problems . journal Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics volume 202 , pages 13--21 . :10.1016/j.jnnfm.2013.09.004

    2013 doi

  10. [18]

    , year 2014

    author Coussot, P. , year 2014 . title Yield stress fluid flows: A review of experimental data . journal Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics volume 211 , pages 31--49 . :10.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.05.006

    2014 doi

  11. [19]

    , year 2018

    author Coussot, P. , year 2018 . title Slow flows of yield stress fluids: Yielding liquids or flowing solids? journal Rheologica Acta volume 57 , pages 1--14 . :10.1007/s00397-017-1055-7

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    , year 2025

    author Coussot, P. , year 2025 . title Fifty shades of yield stress fluids: Rheological challenges and engineering perspectives . journal Rheologica Acta volume 64 , pages 167--193 . :10.1007/s00397-025-01488-w

    2025 doi

  13. [21]

    , author Boyer, S

    author Coussot, P. , author Boyer, S. , year 1995 . title Determination of yield stress fluid behaviour from inclined plane test . journal Rheologica Acta volume 34 , pages 534--543 . :10.1007/BF00712314

    1995 doi

  14. [22]

    , author Nguyen, Q.D

    author Coussot, P. , author Nguyen, Q.D. , author Huynh, H.T. , author Bonn, D. , year 2002 . title Avalanche Behavior in Yield Stress Fluids . journal Physical Review Letters volume 88 , pages 175501 . :10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.175501

    2002 doi

  15. [23]

    , author Prager, W

    author Drucker, D. , author Prager, W. , year 1952 . title Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design . journal Quarterly of applied mathematics volume 10 , pages 157--165

    1952

  16. [24]

    , author Gibson, R.E

    author Drucker, D.C. , author Gibson, R.E. , author Henkel, D.J. , year 1957 . title Soil Mechanics and Work-Hardening Theories of Plasticity . journal Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers volume 122 , pages 338--346 . :10.1061/TACEAT.0007430

    1957 doi

  17. [25]

    , author Kamrin, K

    author Dunatunga, S. , author Kamrin, K. , year 2015 . title Continuum modelling and simulation of granular flows through their many phases . journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics volume 779 , pages 483--513 . :10.1017/jfm.2015.383

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    , author Lions, J.L

    author Duvaut, G. , author Lions, J.L. , year 1972 . title Les In\'equations En M\'ecanique et En Physique . Travaux et Recherches Math\'ematiques, publisher Dunod , address Paris

    1972

  19. [27]

    , author Guo, Q

    author Fei, Y. , author Guo, Q. , author Wu, R. , author Huang, L. , author Gao, M. , year 2021 . title Revisiting integration in the material point method: A scheme for easier separation and less dissipation . journal ACM Transactions on Graphics volume 40 , pages 1--16 . :10...

    2021

  20. [28]

    , author Dimakopoulos, Y

    author Fraggedakis, D. , author Dimakopoulos, Y. , author Tsamopoulos, J. , year 2016 a. title Yielding the yield-stress analysis: A study focused on the effects of elasticity on the settling of a single spherical particle in simple yield-stress fluids . journal Soft Matter vo...

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    , author Dimakopoulos, Y

    author Fraggedakis, D. , author Dimakopoulos, Y. , author Tsamopoulos, J. , year 2016 b. title Yielding the yield stress analysis: A thorough comparison of recently proposed elasto-visco-plastic ( EVP ) fluid models . journal Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics volume 236...

    2016 doi

  22. [30]

    , author Cremonesi, M

    author Franci, A. , author Cremonesi, M. , year 2019 . title 3D regularized ( I )-rheology for granular flows simulation . journal Journal of Computational Physics volume 378 , pages 257--277 . :10.1016/j.jcp.2018.11.011

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    , author Nouar, C

    author Frigaard, I. , author Nouar, C. , year 2005 . title On the usage of viscosity regularisation methods for visco-plastic fluid flow computation . journal Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics volume 127 , pages 1--26 . :10.1016/j.jnnfm.2005.01.003

    2005 doi

  24. [32]

    , author Gast, T

    author Gaume, J. , author Gast, T. , author Teran, J. , author van Herwijnen , A. , author Jiang, C. , year 2018 . title Dynamic anticrack propagation in snow . journal Nature Communications volume 9 , pages 3047 . :10.1038/s41467-018-05181-w

    2018 doi

  25. [33]

    title On dense granular flows

    author GDR MiDi , year 2004 . title On dense granular flows . journal The European Physical Journal E volume 14 , pages 341--365 . :10.1140/epje/i2003-10153-0

    2004 doi

  26. [34]

    , author Jossic, L

    author Gueye, M. , author Jossic, L. , author Dufour, F. , author Magnin, A. , year 2021 . title Numerical modeling of an elasto-viscoplastic fluid around a plate perpendicular to the flow direction . journal Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics volume 297 , pages 104651 ....

    2021

  27. [35]

    , author Suiker, A.S.J

    author Heeres, O.M. , author Suiker, A.S.J. , author De Borst, R. , year 2002 . title A comparison between the Perzyna viscoplastic model and the Consistency viscoplastic model . journal European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids volume 21 , pages 1--12 . :10.1016/S0997-7538(01)01188-3

    2002 doi

  28. [36]

    , author Bulkley, R

    author Herschel, W.H. , author Bulkley, R. , year 1926 . title Konsistenzmessungen von Gummi-Benzoll\"osungen . journal Kolloid-Zeitschrift volume 39 , pages 291--300 . :10.1007/BF01432034

    1926 doi

  29. [37]

    , year 1986

    author Houlsby, G. , year 1986 . title A General Failure Criterion for Frictional and Cohesive Materials . journal Soils and Foundations volume 26 , pages 97--101 . :10.3208/sandf1972.26.2_97

    1986 doi

  30. [38]

    , author Mangeney, A

    author Ionescu, I.R. , author Mangeney, A. , author Bouchut, F. , author Roche, O. , year 2015 . title Viscoplastic modeling of granular column collapse with pressure-dependent rheology . journal Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics volume 219 , pages 1--18 . :10.1016/j.jn...

    2015 doi

  31. [39]

    , year 1993

    author Jefferies, M.G. , year 1993 . title Nor- Sand : A simle critical state model for sand . journal G\'eotechnique volume 43 , pages 91--103 . :10.1680/geot.1993.43.1.91

    1993 doi

  32. [40]

    , author Schroeder, C

    author Jiang, C. , author Schroeder, C. , author Teran, J. , year 2017 . title An angular momentum conserving affine-particle-in-cell method . journal Journal of Computational Physics volume 338 , pages 137--164 . :10.1016/j.jcp.2017.02.050

    2017 doi

  33. [41]

    , author Forterre, Y

    author Jop, P. , author Forterre, Y. , author Pouliquen, O. , year 2005 . title Crucial role of sidewalls in granular surface flows: Consequences for the rheology . journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics volume 541 , pages 167 . :10.1017/S0022112005005987

    2005 doi

  34. [42]

    , author Forterre, Y

    author Jop, P. , author Forterre, Y. , author Pouliquen, O. , year 2006 . title A constitutive law for dense granular flows . journal Nature volume 441 , pages 727--730 . :10.1038/nature04801

    2006 doi

  35. [43]

    , author Ahonguio, F

    author Jossic, L. , author Ahonguio, F. , author Magnin, A. , year 2013 . title Flow of a yield stress fluid perpendicular to a disc . journal Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics volume 191 , pages 14--24 . :10.1016/j.jnnfm.2012.10.006

    2013 doi

  36. [44]

    , author Staron, L

    author Lagr \'e e, P.Y. , author Staron, L. , author Popinet, S. , year 2011 . title The granular column collapse as a continuum: Validity of a two-dimensional Navier -- Stokes model with a ( I )-rheology . journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics volume 686 , pages 378--408 . :10.1...

    2011 doi

  37. [45]

    , year 1969

    author Lee, E.H. , year 1969 . title Elastic- Plastic Deformation at Finite Strains . journal Journal of Applied Mechanics volume 36 , pages 1--6 . :10.1115/1.3564580

    1969 doi

  38. [46]

    , author Naccache, M.F

    author Lopez, W.F. , author Naccache, M.F. , author De Souza Mendes, P.R. , year 2018 . title Rising bubbles in yield stress materials . journal Journal of Rheology volume 62 , pages 209--219 . :10.1122/1.4995348

    2018 doi

  39. [47]

    , author Roche, O

    author Mangeney, A. , author Roche, O. , author Hungr, O. , author Mangold, N. , author Faccanoni, G. , author Lucas, A. , year 2010 . title Erosion and mobility in granular collapse over sloping beds . journal Journal of Geophysical Research volume 115 , pages F03040 . :10.10...

    2010 doi

  40. [48]

    , author Nakai, T

    author Matsuoka, H. , author Nakai, T. , year 1974 . title Stress-deformation and strength characteristics of soil under three different principal stresses . journal Proceedings of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers volume 1974 , pages 59--70 . :10.2208/jscej1969.1974.232_59

    1974

  41. [49]

    , author Goyon, J

    author N'Gouamba, E. , author Goyon, J. , author Coussot, P. , year 2019 . title Elastoplastic behavior of yield stress fluids . journal Physical Review Fluids volume 4 , pages 123301 . :10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.123301

    2019 doi

  42. [50]

    , year 1987

    author Papanastasiou, T.C. , year 1987 . title Flows of Materials with Yield . journal Journal of Rheology volume 31 , pages 385--404 . :10.1122/1.549926

    1987 doi

  43. [51]

    , author Blanc, T

    author Pastor, M. , author Blanc, T. , author Haddad, B. , author Drempetic, V. , author Morles, M.S. , author Dutto, P. , author Stickle, M.M. , author Mira, P. , author Merodo, J.A.F. , year 2015 a. title Depth Averaged Models for Fast Landslide Propagation : Mathematical , ...

    2015 doi

  44. [52]

    , author Martin Stickle, M

    author Pastor, M. , author Martin Stickle, M. , author Dutto, P. , author Mira, P. , author Fern \'a ndez Merodo, J.A. , author Blanc, T. , author Sancho, S. , author Ben \'i tez, A.S. , year 2015 b. title A viscoplastic approach to the behaviour of fluidized geomaterials with...

    2015 doi

  45. [53]

    , year 1993

    author Peri \'c , D. , year 1993 . title On a class of constitutive equations in viscoplasticity: Formulation and computational issues . journal International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering volume 36 , pages 1365--1393 . :10.1002/nme.1620360807

    1993 doi

  46. [54]

    , year 1963

    author Perzyna, P. , year 1963 . title The constitutive equations for rate sensitive plastic materials . journal Quarterly of applied mathematics volume 20 , pages 321--332 . :10.1090/qam/144536

    1963 doi

  47. [55]

    , year 1966

    author Perzyna, P. , year 1966 . title Fundamental Problems in Viscoplasticity , in: booktitle Advances in Applied Mechanics . publisher Elsevier . volume volume 9 , pp. pages 243--377 . :10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70009-7

    1966 doi

  48. [56]

    , year 2017

    author Pradhana, A. , year 2017 . title Multiphase Simulation Using Material Point Method . Ph.D. thesis. UCLA

    2017

  49. [57]

    , year 2012

    author Puzrin, A.M. , year 2012 . title Constitutive Modelling in Geomechanics : Introduction . publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg , address Berlin, Heidelberg . :10.1007/978-3-642-27395-7

    2012 doi

  50. [58]

    , author Barker, T

    author Rauter, M. , author Barker, T. , author Fellin, W. , year 2020 . title Granular viscosity from plastic yield surfaces: The role of the deformation type in granular flows . journal Computers and Geotechnics volume 122 , pages 103492 . :10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103492

    2020

  51. [59]

    , author Burland, J.B

    author Roscoe, K.H. , author Burland, J.B. , year 1968 . title On the generalized stress-strain behaviour of wet clay , in: booktitle Engineering Plasticity . publisher Cambridge University Press , address Cambridge, UK , pp. pages 535--609

    1968

  52. [60]

    , year 2007

    author Saramito, P. , year 2007 . title A new constitutive equation for elastoviscoplastic fluid flows . journal Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics volume 145 , pages 1--14 . :10.1016/j.jnnfm.2007.04.004

    2007 doi

  53. [61]

    , year 2009

    author Saramito, P. , year 2009 . title A new elastoviscoplastic model based on the Herschel -- Bulkley viscoplastic model . journal Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics volume 158 , pages 154--161 . :10.1016/j.jnnfm.2008.12.001

    2009 doi

  54. [62]

    , year 2016

    author Saramito, P. , year 2016 . title Complex Fluids: Modeling and Algorithms . volume volume 79 of series Math\'ematiques et Applications . publisher Springer International Publishing , address Cham . :10.1007/978-3-319-44362-1

    2016 doi

  55. [63]

    , year 2021

    author Saramito, P. , year 2021 . title A new brittle-elastoviscoplastic fluid based on the Drucker -- Prager plasticity . journal Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics volume 294 , pages 104584 . :10.1016/j.jnnfm.2021.104584

    2021

  56. [64]

    , year 2026

    author Saramito, P. , year 2026 . title Yet another thermodynamic environment . journal Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics volume 348 , pages 105548 . :10.1016/j.jnnfm.2025.105548

    2026

  57. [65]

    , author Wachs, A

    author Saramito, P. , author Wachs, A. , year 2017 . title Progress in numerical simulation of yield stress fluid flows . journal Rheologica Acta volume 56 , pages 211--230 . :10.1007/s00397-016-0985-9

    2017 doi

  58. [66]

    , author Barker, T

    author Schaeffer, D.G. , author Barker, T. , author Tsuji, D. , author Gremaud, P. , author Shearer, M. , author Gray, J.M.N.T. , year 2019 . title Constitutive relations for compressible granular flow in the inertial regime . journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics volume 874 , pa...

    2019 doi

  59. [67]

    , author Wroth, P

    author Schofield, A.N. , author Wroth, P. , year 1968 . title Critical State Soil Mechanics . publisher McGraw-Hill London

    1968

  60. [68]

    , author Balmforth, N.J

    author Shemilt, J.D. , author Balmforth, N.J. , author Hewitt, D.R. , year 2026 a. title Start-up and inertialess instability of elasto-viscoplastic channel flow . :10.48550/arXiv.2606.01010, arXiv:2606.01010 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01010

    2026 doi arXiv

  61. [69]

    , author Balmforth, N.J

    author Shemilt, J.D. , author Balmforth, N.J. , author Hewitt, D.R. , year 2026 b. title A transition to elasto-viscoplastic turbulence in inertialess channel flow? :10.48550/arXiv.2606.28580, arXiv:2606.28580 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28580

    2026 doi arXiv

  62. [70]

    , year 1988

    author Simo, J. , year 1988 . title A framework for finite strain elastoplasticity based on maximum plastic dissipation and the multiplicative decomposition: Part I . Continuum formulation . journal Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering volume 66 , pages 199--2...

    1988 doi

  63. [71]

    , year 1992

    author Simo, J.C. , year 1992 . title Algorithms for static and dynamic multiplicative plasticity that preserve the classical return mapping schemes of the infinitesimal theory . journal Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering volume 99 , pages 61--112 . :10.1016...

    1992 doi

  64. [72]

    , author Hughes, T.J.R

    author Simo, J.C. , author Hughes, T.J.R. , year 1998 . title Computational Inelasticity . Number number v. 7 in series Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics , publisher Springer , address New York

    1998

  65. [73]

    , author Kirby, R.M

    author Steffen, M. , author Kirby, R.M. , author Berzins, M. , year 2008 . title Analysis and reduction of quadrature errors in the material point method ( MPM ) . journal International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering volume 76 , pages 922--948 . :10.1002/nme.2360

    2008 doi

  66. [74]

    , author Chen, Z

    author Sulsky, D. , author Chen, Z. , author Schreyer, H.L. , year 1994 . title A particle method for history-dependent materials . journal Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering volume 118 , pages 179--196 . :10.1016/0045-7825(94)90112-0

    1994 doi

  67. [75]

    , author Dimakopoulos, Y

    author Syrakos, A. , author Dimakopoulos, Y. , author Tsamopoulos, J. , year 2020 . title A finite volume method for the simulation of elastoviscoplastic flows and its application to the lid-driven cavity case . journal Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics volume 275 , pag...

    2020

  68. [76]

    , year 2009

    author Tian, C. , year 2009 . title The ratio of out-of-plane to in-plane stresses for plane strain problems . journal Meccanica volume 44 , pages 105--107 . :10.1007/s11012-008-9168-9

    2009 doi

  69. [77]

    orper im plastisch- deformablen Zustand . journal Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu G\

    author von Mises , R. , year 1913 . title Mechanik der festen K\"orper im plastisch- deformablen Zustand . journal Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu G\"ottingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse , pages 582--592

    1913

  70. [78]

    , author Sluys, L.J

    author Wang, W.M. , author Sluys, L.J. , author De Borst, R. , year 1997 . title Viscoplasticity for instabilities due to strain softening and strain-rate softening . journal International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering volume 40 , pages 3839--3864 . :10.1002/(SI...

    1997 doi

  71. [79]

    , year 2018

    author Wojciechowski, M. , year 2018 . title A note on the differences between Drucker-Prager and Mohr-Coulomb shear strength criteria . journal Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica volume 40 , pages 163--169 . :10.2478/sgem-2018-0016

    2018 doi

  72. [80]

    , year 1991

    author Wood, D.M. , year 1991 . title Soil Behaviour and Critical State Soil Mechanics . edition 1 ed., publisher Cambridge University Press . :10.1017/CBO9781139878272

    1991 doi

  73. [81]

    , author Chen, L.S

    author Xiao, H. , author Chen, L.S. , year 2002 . title Hencky's elasticity model and linear stress-strain relations in isotropic finite hyperelasticity . journal Acta Mechanica volume 157 , pages 51--60 . :10.1007/BF01182154

    2002 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.