Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 37 references

The Legendrian Whitney trick

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes a Legendrian Whitney trick: standard contact disks can be slid off standard Legendrian spheres by compactly supported contact isotopies, and this yields the existence h-principle for codimension-two isocontact…

desk verdict The Legendrian Whitney trick is a plausible and genuinely new idea, but the paper's second half leans on unproven assertions—Lemma 6, Proposition 11, and Lemma 10—so the h-principle application is not yet established as written. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04828 v1 pith:4JR42CBC submitted 2019-08-13 math.SG

Roger Casals , Dishant M. Pancholi , Francisco Presas This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.SG MSC 53D1053D1557R17
keywords contactstructureisocontactembeddingLegendrianWhitneytrickh-principlesubmanifoldcodimension-twoembeddingsovertwistedstructures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a contact-topological analogue of the smooth Whitney trick: for $n\ge 2$, if a properly embedded standard contact disk and a standard Legendrian sphere inside a standard contact ball are smoothly standard, then a compactly supported contact isotopy can make them disjoint. This matters because it shows that in higher dimensions the interaction between contact submanifolds and Legendrian submanifolds is governed by smooth topology, in contrast to the rigid behavior of overtwisted disks in low dimensions. The same mechanism yields an existence h-principle: any formal isocontact embedding of a contact manifold into another of codimension two, with $\dim M=\dim N+2\ge 5$, can be deformed, through formal isocontact embeddings, to a genuine isocontact embedding. The central device is a Legendrian Whitney bridge, a Legendrian embedding whose two ends lie respectively on the Legendrian sphere and the contact disk, replacing the smooth Whitney disk.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Legendrian Whitney bridge: a Legendrian embedding $\psi:W\times[0,1]\to(M,\xi)$ (or a quotient version $\overline{W}$) whose lower and upper ends are isotropic embeddings into the Legendrian sphere $S$ and the contact submanifold $D$, whose boundary over $\partial W$ is exactly the intersection $\Sigma=S\cap D$, and whose interior avoids both submanifolds. It plays the role of the Whitney disk: the sphere is slid along it by a compactly supported contact vector field, equivalently a contact Hamiltonian, so that the intersection is pushed off the disk and no new intersection is created. The bridge is first built as a smooth embedding, using the smooth embedding theorem and transversality, and then converted into a Legendrian embedding through the h-principle for Legendrian immersions; the local computation is carried out in the 1-jet model $J^1(W,\xi_{\mathrm{st}})$, where the contact disk is cut out by $\{x=0,p_x=0\}$, the sphere is the zero section, and the sliding flow is cut off carefully in the conjugate momentum $p_n$ to keep the support compact.

What would settle it

Find a standard embedding of $S^n$ into $S^1\times B^{2n}$ ($n\ge 2$) whose projection to $B^{2n}$ cannot be made, by adding finitely many kinks, to have only paired self-intersections of opposite sign, or whose Whitney-disk sliding cannot be lifted to an embedding in $S^1\times B^{2n}$ without creating a new self-intersection; such an example would falsify Proposition 11 and remove the load-bearing step of Theorem 8.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For $n\ge 2$, let $\varphi:(D^{2n-1},\xi_{\mathrm{st}})\to(B,\xi)$ be a proper isocontact embedding of the standard contact disk and $\lambda:S^n\to(B,\xi)$ a Legendrian embedding, both smoothly standard—that is, smoothly isotopic to the linear inclusions described in the introduction. Theorem 1 asserts that there is a compactly supported family of isocontact embeddings starting at $\varphi$ whose final image is disjoint from $\lambda$. The proof constructs the intersection $\Sigma=S^n\cap D^{2n-1}$, fills it with an $(n-1)$-dimensional manifold $W$ whose boundary is $\Sigma$, and builds a Legendrian Whitney bridge $F:\overline{W}\to B$; a cut-off contact Hamiltonian flow slides $S^n$ along the bridge until it clears $D^{2n-1}$. Theorem 2 draws the h-principle consequence: every formal isocontact embedding $(f_0,F_s^0):(N,\xi_N)\to(M,\xi_M)$ with $\dim M=\dim N+2\ge 5$ is deformable, through formal isocontact embeddings, to a genuine isocontact embedding $(f_1,df_1)$. Here 'formal' means the embedding is augmented by a fiberwise linear map covering it and restricting to the differential on the contact distribution; such data is the algebraic shadow that a genuine isocontact embedding would carry. In the paper's own terms, this resolves the existence problem for codimension-two contact embeddings with prescribed contact structure.

Load-bearing premise

The proof's Proposition 11 assumes that a standard $n$-sphere in $S^1\times B^{2n}$ can be arranged, after adding finitely many small loops (kinks), so that its projected immersion into $B^{2n}$ has all self-intersection points paired with opposite sign, and that the Whitney-disk sliding can be lifted to an isotopy of the embedding in $S^1\times B^{2n}$; this connectivity of the embedding space is asserted without proof, and Theorem 8's h-principle argument depends on it through Lemma 10.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In contact manifolds of dimension at least five, a standard contact disk and a standard Legendrian sphere admit no contact intersection obstruction beyond the smooth one: smooth cancellations become contact cancellations.
  • The existence h-principle for codimension-two isocontact embeddings holds: any formal isocontact embedding is formally homotopic to a genuine one, so the only obstructions to realizing a contact submanifold are algebraic-topological.
  • Together with the h-principle for higher-codimension smooth submanifolds, the result completes the existence h-principle for isocontact submanifolds in every codimension.
  • The dimensional hypothesis $n\ge 2$ is essential: in the 3-dimensional case the conclusion can fail without changing the self-linking number, so the gap between smooth and contact topology persists in low dimensions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the bridge construction is local and uses only the Legendrian h-principle, so the same removal argument should transplant from the standard ball to any contact manifold in which both the contact disk and the Legendrian sphere pass through a common Darboux chart.
  • Editorial extension: a parametric version of the Legendrian Whitney trick—sliding a whole family of contact disks off one Legendrian sphere simultaneously—would give a direct route to relative and classification h-principles; the paper only uses a light one-parameter version inside Lemma 10.
  • Editorial extension: if the Whitney-bridge sliding survives in non-simply connected ambient manifolds, the overtwisted-disk insertion in Theorem 8 could be bypassed or weakened, since the paper invokes it only to obtain a genuine isocontact embedding and then removes its intersection with the Legendrian page.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proves a 'Legendrian Whitney trick' (Theorem 1): in a standard contact ball of dimension 2n+1, n≥2, a properly embedded standard contact disk and a standard Legendrian n-sphere that are smoothly standard can be made disjoint by a compactly supported contact isotopy. It then uses this theorem to prove an existence h-principle (Theorem 2) for codimension-two isocontact embeddings with a prescribed contact structure, passing through a local version (Theorem 8) and an overtwisted-disk insertion argument. The main new ingredients are a Legendrian Whitney bridge (Proposition 3), a modified bridge (Lemma 6), and a connectedness statement for embeddings of S^n into S^1×B^{2n} (Proposition 11). The paper is clearly organized and the overall strategy is plausible, but several load-bearing steps are only sketched or asserted without proof.

Significance. If the results are correct, they would establish an important new flexibility phenomenon in high-dimensional contact topology: the removal of intersections between Legendrian and contact submanifolds whenever a smooth cancellation exists, and the existence of codimension-two isocontact embeddings in every formal class in dimension at least five. This would complement the rigidity results of Casals–Murphy–Presas and answer a natural existence question. The manuscript is well written and the strategy—combining standard h-principles, contact Hamiltonians, the smooth Whitney trick, and Haefliger's connectivity theorem—is attractive. However, the proofs of Proposition 11, Lemma 6, and parts of Proposition 3 are incomplete, and these are load-bearing for the main theorems. The paper is therefore not yet ready for publication in its present form.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2, Proposition 11] The proof of Proposition 11 is not self-contained and leaves central topological steps unproved. Specifically: (i) the claim that after genericity and 'possibly adding a finite number of kinks' the projection π∘e has all self-intersection points paired (zero algebraic self-intersection) is asserted without a construction or a justification that kinks can change the pairing to zero; (ii) the existence of a lift ~d of the Whitney disk d to S^1×B^{2n} with the stated intersection properties is not established, because lifting requires a consistent choice of the S^1-coordinate over a 2-cell whose boundary arcs lie on two different sheets, and the vertical (S^1) component must be interpolated without reintroducing self-intersections; (iii) the assertion that the Whitney-move isotopy of the immersed projection lifts to an isotopy of the embedding e is likewise unsupported. Since Lemma 10 invokes Proposition 11 to deform the family φ_t while fixing endpoints, and Theorem 8 depends on Lemma 10, the proof of Theorem 2 collapses unless Proposition 11 is proved in full detail.
  2. [Section 2.3.2, Lemma 6] The proof of Lemma 6 does not establish the crucial inequalities in part (e). It states that items (a)–(d) are 'proven similarly as Proposition 3' and that the strict inequalities ∂_{q_{n-1}}x > 0 and ∂_{q_n}x > 0 'can be ensured' because the initial e satisfies non-strict inequalities globally; no construction of the extension e with strict positivity is given. These inequalities are used in Lemma 7 (and hence in the displacement argument in §2.3.3) to conclude that p_x ≠ 0 when x = 0 and p_n ≠ 0. Without a proof of Lemma 6(e), the proof of Theorem 1 is incomplete at this point.
  3. [Section 2.2, Proposition 3, conditions (a)–(c)] The proof of Proposition 3 asserts that the formal isotropic embedding (φ,G) can be chosen to satisfy conditions (a)–(c). Condition (c) is justified by the deformation retraction of W×[0,1] to (W×[0,ε])∪(C_Σ×[0,1]), and condition (b) is merely stated; the proof does not show how the Lagrangian subbundle G_t(TW⊕{0}) is extended over the rest of W×[0,1] while preserving conditions (a) and (b). Since Proposition 3 constructs the Legendrian Whitney bridge used in Theorem 1, this is a load-bearing gap.
  4. [Section 3.2, Lemma 10] The proof of Lemma 10 is a single sentence that invokes Proposition 11. Even if Proposition 11 were true, the conclusion of Lemma 10 requires a deformation of the entire family φ_t (not just of S_π) with both endpoint conditions φ_{0,s}=φ_0 and φ_{1,s}=φ_1 fixed for all s, and with the deformation relative to the boundary of the disk. Merely deforming S_π to a small sphere and precomposing does not automatically preserve these relative endpoint conditions. A relative/parametric version of the connectedness statement is needed, but none is stated or proved. The proof of Theorem 8 therefore remains incomplete even modulo Proposition 11.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.3.2, Lemma 6] The proof refers to item '(g)', but the statement of Lemma 6 lists items (a)–(f); additionally, item (f) is printed tautologically as 'e(W×{0})⊂e(W×{0})'. Please correct the reference and clarify the intended statement of item (f).
  2. [Section 3.2, Lemma 10 proof] The sentence 'Proposition 11, proven below, shows that the space of smoothly embedded n-spheres in B^{2n+1}∼=D^{2n-1} is connected' is confusing: the space in question should be the space of embeddings into S^1×B^{2n}, not into B^{2n+1} or D^{2n-1}. Please rephrase the relevant diffeomorphism statements.
  3. [Bibliography] Entry [34] contains a stray line 'C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 232, (1951). 142–144.' that appears to belong to a separate reference; please remove or format it properly.
  4. [Proposition 11] The term 'standard embedding' is used in the statement of Proposition 11 without a definition; please define it (e.g., as the embedding that is isotopic to the standard inclusion into a slice {p}×B^{2n}).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Legendrian Whitney trick and the isocontact h-principle are derived from standard h-principles and Whitney-type arguments, with self-citations to independent published results only.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: Theorem 1 is proved internally via Proposition 3 (construction of the Legendrian Whitney bridge), Lemma 6 (extension of the collar), and a direct contact-Hamiltonian computation in Section 2.3; no equation in that proof is defined in terms of the conclusion, and no parameter is fitted to the target intersection. Theorem 2 is then obtained from Theorem 8 by a standard h-principle reduction: insert an overtwisted disk, apply the external h-principles [3,11,12,21], move the embedding away with Lemma 9, use Theorem 1 to avoid the Legendrian sphere, and finish with Lemma 10 and Proposition 11. The only author-overlapping citation that is load-bearing is [7] (Casals–Murphy–Presas), used to assert that changing the monodromy in the adapted open book (T*S^n, lambda_st; tau^{-1}_{S^n}) yields an overtwisted contact structure. That is a published, externally checkable theorem, not an input equivalent to the present conclusion, so it is real evidence rather than circularity. The genuine weakness is a proof gap, not circularity: Proposition 11 asserts without proof that after adding finitely many kinks the projection of a standard sphere has all self-intersection points paired, and that the Whitney disk sliding can be lifted to an isotopy of the embedding in S^1 x B^{2n}; this is load-bearing for Lemma 10 and hence for Theorem 8, but it is an omitted justification, not a reduction of a conclusion to its own input. No fitted quantity is relabelled as a prediction, no known result is merely renamed, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work to force a choice. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof relies on standard h-principles and a few asserted geometric steps. The main ad hoc assumptions are the kink-pairing claim in Proposition 11 and the existence of the formal data satisfying condition (c) in Proposition 3. No new physical or mathematical entities are posited.

free parameters (1)
  • Smallness constants ε, c, δ and cut-off functions = Arbitrarily small positive reals; no fixed values
    Used in Section 2.3 to define collars, cut-off functions and the domain of the contact flow. The existence argument only requires that they be chosen sufficiently small; the theorem does not depend on their values.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard theorems used as black boxes: Whitney embedding theorem, smooth Whitney trick, Thom transversality, Gromov's h-principle for Legendrian immersions, Borman-Eliashberg-Murphy h-principle for overtwisted contact manifolds [3], Gray's stability, Moser's stability, Haefliger's theorem on…
    These are cited and used throughout Sections 2 and 3; the paper does not reprove them.
  • standard math The space of standard embeddings of S^n into B^{2n+1} is connected for n≥2 (Haefliger [22]).
    Used in the proof of Proposition 11 to conclude connectedness in S^1×B^{2n} after deforming the sphere into Op(p)×B^{2n}.
  • domain assumption The monodromy change τ_{S^n} to τ^{-1}_{S^n} in the adapted open book produces an overtwisted contact structure (proven in [7]).
    Used in Section 3.2 to insert an overtwisted disk into the target; [7] is by two of the present authors (Casals, Presas) and Murphy, and is used as an external published result.
  • ad hoc to paper After genericity and possibly adding a finite number of kinks, the projected smooth map π∘e : S^n -> B^{2n} can be assumed to be a generic immersion with all self-intersection points paired.
    Stated without proof in Proposition 11. This is load-bearing for the connectedness argument; if false, Lemma 10 and Theorem 8 would not follow by the given argument.
  • ad hoc to paper The formal isotropic embedding (φ,G) of W×[0,1] can be chosen satisfying conditions (a)-(c) in Section 2.2, particularly that G_t(TW⊕{0}) is a Lagrangian subspace of V_t.
    The proof of Proposition 3 asserts condition (c) can be assumed via a deformation retraction argument; this is not fully detailed and is needed for the h-principle for Legendrian immersions to apply.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Legendrian Whitney trick." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4JR42CBC

@misc{pith2026190804828,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Legendrian Whitney trick},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4JR42CBC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04828}
}
read the original abstract

In this article, we prove a Legendrian Whitney trick which allows for the removal of intersections between codimension-two contact submanifolds and Legendrian submanifolds, assuming such a smooth cancellation is possible. This technique is applied to show the existence h-principle for codimension-two contact embeddings with a prescribed contact structure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.04828 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Legendrian neighborhood Σ × D 2 of the intersection Σ = S ∩ D and the image of the Legendrian Whitney bridge, where W ×[0, 1] is mapped into the third quadrant. Remark 4. The map ψ = F ◦ e : W × [0, 1] −→ B will be constructed as a 1-parameter family {ψt}t∈[0,1] of isotropic embeddings of W, such that ψ0 = (F ◦ e)|W×{0} ⊆ S and ψ1 = (F ◦ e)|W×{1} ⊆ D. Nevertheless, we first find a family of smooth embeddings {φt… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A depiction of Σ × D 2 ⊆ B, and the modification of the Legendrian Whitney bridge (e, F, W) to its extension (e, F, W), which places the extended collar CΣ × (−ε − 1, 1 + ε) of Σ inside the domain Σ × D 2 . In the picture, the angle is extended from (0, 1) on the right, to (−ε − 1, 1 + ε) on the left. 2.3.2. Preparation Before Sliding. The Legendrian Whitney bridge (e, F, W) provided by Proposition 3 can be intuitiv… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The Legendrian neighborhood Σ × D 2 of the modified intersection Σ = S ∩ D (Yellow) and the image of the extended Legendrian Whitney bridge (Green), where W ×[0, 1] is mapped into the third quadrant. The purple curve represents the original boundary of the Legendrian Whitney bridge (e, F, W) and the flowlines of extended vector field ∂qn (Black) displacing the original Σ (Orange). The canonical lift of the vector fi… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The figure depicts the linearized version Ge of the function G In order to construct such Ge, we can proceed as follows. Consider the function Ge =    1 pn ∈ [0, c] 1 − 2 pn−c c pn ∈ [c, 2c] −1 + pn−2c 2c pn ∈ [2c, 4c] 0 pn ≥ 4c , which we extend to negative val…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [32]

    Iso-contact embeddings of manifolds in co-dimension $2$

    D. Pancholi, S. Pandit, Iso–contact embeddings of manifolds in co–dimension 2. arXiv:1808.04059

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [27]

    Honda, Y

    K. Honda, Y. Huang, Convex hypersurface theory in contact topology, arXiv:1907.06025

    arXiv 1907

  3. [1]

    V. I. Arnold, S. M. Gusein-Zade, A. N. Varchenko. Singularities of Differentiable Maps. Volume I. Birkh¨ auser, Boston, Basel, Sttutgart. 1985

    work page 1985

  4. [2]

    Bennequin

    D. Bennequin. Entrelacements et ´ equations de Pfaff.Third Schnepfenried geometry conference, Vol. 1 (Schnepfenried, 1982), 87–161, Ast´ erisque, 107-108, Soc. Math. France, Paris, 1983

    work page 1982

  5. [3]

    Borman, Y

    M.S. Borman, Y. Eliashberg, E. Murphy, Existence and classification of overtwisted contact structures in all dimensions , to appear in Acta Mathematica

    work page

  6. [4]

    Non-simplicity of isocontact embeddings in all higher dimensions

    R. Casals, J.B. Etnyre, Non-simplicity of isocontact embeddings in all higher dimensions, arXiv:1811.05455

    work page Pith review arXiv

  7. [5]

    Casals, J.L

    R. Casals, J.L. P´ erez, A. del Pino, F. Presas, Existence h-principle for Engel structures, Invent. Math. Volume 210, Issue 2, (2017) 417-451

    work page 2017

  8. [6]

    Casals, A

    R. Casals, A. del Pino, Classification of Engel Knots, Math. Ann. Issue 1, Volume 371 (2018), 391-404

    work page 2018

Show all 37 references
  1. [7]

    Casals, E

    R. Casals, E. Murphy, F. Presas, Geometric criteria for overtwistedness , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 32 (2019), no. 2, 563–604

    2019

  2. [8]

    Casson, ”Three lectures on new infinite constructions in 4-dimensional manifolds” , A la Recherche de la Topologie Perdue , Progress in Mathematics , 62 , Birkh¨ auser (1986) pp

    A. Casson, ”Three lectures on new infinite constructions in 4-dimensional manifolds” , A la Recherche de la Topologie Perdue , Progress in Mathematics , 62 , Birkh¨ auser (1986) pp. 201-244

    1986

  3. [9]

    Chekanov

    Y. Chekanov. Differential algebra of Legendrian links. Invent. Math. 150 (2002), no. 3, 441–483

    2002

  4. [10]

    Colin, Livres ouverts en g´ eom´ etrie de contact, Ast´ erisque, S´ eminaire Bourbaki 59` eme ann´ ee, 2006-2007, 969, 91-118

    V. Colin, Livres ouverts en g´ eom´ etrie de contact, Ast´ erisque, S´ eminaire Bourbaki 59` eme ann´ ee, 2006-2007, 969, 91-118

    2006

  5. [11]

    Eliashberg, Classification of overtwisted contact structures on 3-manifolds, Invent

    Ya. Eliashberg, Classification of overtwisted contact structures on 3-manifolds, Invent. Math. 98 (1989), 623–637

    1989

  6. [12]

    Eliashberg, N

    Y. Eliashberg, N. Mishachev, Introduction to the h–Principle. Grad. Studies in Math. 48. AMS, Providence 2002

    2002

  7. [13]

    Eliahsberg, N

    Y. Eliahsberg, N. Mishachev, Wrinkling of smooth mappings and its applications, Inven. Math. 130 (1997), 345-369

    1997

  8. [14]

    J. Etnyre. Legendrian and transversal knots. Handbook of knot theory, 105–185, Elsevier B. V., Amsterdam, 2005

    2005

  9. [15]

    Etnyre, R

    J. Etnyre, R. Furukawa, Braided embeddings of contact 3-manifolds in the standard contact 5-sphere. J. Topol. 10 (2017), no. 2, 412—446

    2017

  10. [16]

    Etnyre, Y

    J. Etnyre, Y. Lekili, Embedding all contact 3–manifolds in a fixed contact 5–manifold, to appear in Journal of the LMS

  11. [17]

    Freedman, ”The topology of four-dimensional manifolds”, J

    M. Freedman, ”The topology of four-dimensional manifolds”, J. Diff. Geom. , 17 (1982) pp. 357-453

    1982

  12. [18]

    Fuchs, S

    D. Fuchs, S. Tabachnikov. Invariants of Legendrian and transverse knots in the standard contact space. Topology 36 (1997), no. 5, 1025–1053

    1997

  13. [19]

    H. Geiges. An Introduction to Contact Topology. Cambr. Studies in Adv. Math. 109. Cambr. Univ. Press 2008

    2008

  14. [20]

    Goodwillie, T. G. A multiple disjunction lemma for smooth concordance embeddings. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 86 (1990), no. 431

    1990

  15. [21]

    Gromov, Partial differential relations

    M. Gromov, Partial differential relations. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)], Vol. 9, Springer-Verlag, Berlin

  16. [22]

    Haefliger, Andr´ e,Differentiable imbeddings. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 67 1961 109–112

    1961

  17. [23]

    Haefliger, Andr´ e,Knotted (4k− 1)–spheres in 6k-space. Ann. of Math. (2) 75 1962 452–466

    1962

  18. [24]

    A. Hatcher. Algebraic topology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

    2002

  19. [25]

    Hatcher, Topological moduli spaces of knots, available at A

    A. Hatcher, Topological moduli spaces of knots, available at A. Hatcher’s website (see also arXiv:math/9909095)

    arXiv

  20. [26]

    Honda, On the classification of tight contact structures

    K. Honda, On the classification of tight contact structures. I. Geom. Topol. 4:309-368, 200

  21. [28]

    R. Kirby. The Whitney trick , Celebratio Mathematica

  22. [29]

    Lazarev Maximal contact and symplectic structures , arXiv:1810.11728

    O. Lazarev Maximal contact and symplectic structures , arXiv:1810.11728

    arXiv

  23. [30]

    An analogue of the Whitney trick

    Mabillard, Isaac; Wagner, Uli; Eliminating Tverberg points, I. An analogue of the Whitney trick . Computational geom- etry (SoCG’14), 171–180, ACM, New York, 2014

    2014

  24. [31]

    Milnor, Lectures on the h-cobordism Theorem, Princeton University Press (1965), Princeton

    J. Milnor, Lectures on the h-cobordism Theorem, Princeton University Press (1965), Princeton

    1965

  25. [33]

    Shapiro, Obstructions to the Imbedding of a Complex in a Euclidean Space.: I

    A. Shapiro, Obstructions to the Imbedding of a Complex in a Euclidean Space.: I. The First Obstruction, Annals of Mathematics Second Series, Vol. 66, No. 2 (Sep., 1957), pp. 256-269

    1957

  26. [34]

    Smale, On the structure of manifolds, Amer

    S. Smale, On the structure of manifolds, Amer. J. Math.84 (1962), 387-399. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 232, (1951). 142–144

    1962

  27. [35]

    Vogel, Non-loose unknots, overtwisted discs, and the contact mapping class group of S3, Geom

    T. Vogel, Non-loose unknots, overtwisted discs, and the contact mapping class group of S3, Geom. Funct. Anal. 28 (2018), no. 1, 228–288

    2018

  28. [36]

    Whitney, Differentiable manifolds

    H. Whitney, Differentiable manifolds. Ann. of Math. (2) 37 (1936), no. 3, 645-680

    1936

  29. [37]

    Whitney, The self-intersections of a smooth n-manifold in 2n-space, Ann

    H. Whitney, The self-intersections of a smooth n-manifold in 2n-space, Ann. Math. (2) 45 (April 1944), pp. 220-246. 16 ROGER CASALS, DISHANT M. PANCHOLI, AND FRANCISCO PRESAS University of California Davis, Dept. of Mathematics, Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA E-mail addr...

    1944

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.