On the parameterized complexity of Broadcast Independence and Broadcast Packing
Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 18:51 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Broadcast Independence and Broadcast Packing are FPT when parameterized by treewidth plus diameter.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Broadcast Independence and Broadcast Packing are fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by treewidth plus diameter via dynamic-programming algorithms over nice tree decompositions. As corollaries, both problems are FPT parameterized by k and treewidth and in XP for treewidth alone. Broadcast Independence is W[1]-hard for pathwidth, weighted versions are W[1]-hard for vertex cover, and there is a constant-factor approximation for Broadcast Independence parameterized by treewidth.
What carries the argument
A family of dynamic-programming algorithms over nice tree decompositions that track broadcast assignments, distances, and eccentricities while ensuring independence or packing constraints.
If this is right
- Both problems are FPT parameterized by the solution size k together with treewidth.
- Both problems are in XP when parameterized by treewidth alone, extending the known tree algorithm.
- Broadcast Independence is W[1]-hard parameterized by pathwidth.
- The weighted versions of both problems are W[1]-hard parameterized by vertex cover.
- There exists a constant-factor approximation algorithm for Broadcast Independence parameterized by treewidth.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The dynamic programming technique could potentially apply to related problems such as other forms of domination or covering with distance constraints.
- The emphasis on diameter suggests it is essential for bounding the state space in distance-based graph problems.
- These algorithms might be implementable for networks where both treewidth and diameter are small in practice.
Load-bearing premise
The input graph has a computable nice tree decomposition of width equal to its treewidth, and eccentricities of vertices can be precomputed in polynomial time to initialize the dynamic programming states.
What would settle it
A specific graph with small treewidth and small diameter where computing the maximum broadcast independence value requires superpolynomial time in the parameter would falsify the FPT claim.
read the original abstract
A broadcast on a connected graph is a function f that assigns each vertex v an integer f(v) with 0 <= f(v) <= ecc(v) where ecc(v) denotes the eccentricity of v. A vertex u hears a broadcasting vertex v (with f(v)>0) if u is at distance at most f(v) from v. Beyond the classical broadcast domination problem, where every vertex is required to hear at least one vertex, two variants raise intriguing combinatorial and algorithmic questions. In an independent broadcast, no broadcasting vertex hears another broadcasting vertex, while a broadcast packing requires that every vertex hears at most one broadcasting vertex. The corresponding problems Broadcast Independence and Broadcast Packing ask for broadcasts of values at least k under these constraints, where the value is the sum of the broadcast values. We initiate a systematic study of the parameterized complexity of such problems. We prove that Broadcast Independence and Broadcast Packing are FPT parameterized by the treewidth plus the diameter of G, with a family of dynamic-programming algorithms over nice tree decompositions. We obtain as a corollary that both problems are FPT parameterized by k and the treewidth of G and XP for treewidth only. The latter result shows that the known algorithm for trees (Bessy and Rautenbach, DAM 2022) can indeed be extended to bounded treewidth graphs. On the negative side, we show that Broadcast Independence is W[1]-hard parameterized by the pathwidth of G. Note that this result completes the picture for parameter k and treewidth for Broadcast Independence since it is known to be W[1]-hard for k only. We complement these results by showing that a weighted version of both problems, where the input comes with a weight function on the edges, is W[1]-hard parameterized by the vertex cover of G. Finally, we provide a constant-factor approximation algorithm parameterized by treewidth for Broadcast Independence.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript studies the parameterized complexity of Broadcast Independence and Broadcast Packing. It proves both problems are FPT parameterized by treewidth plus diameter via dynamic-programming algorithms over nice tree decompositions. Corollaries include FPT for k plus treewidth and XP for treewidth alone. Broadcast Independence is shown W[1]-hard for pathwidth, completing the picture with the known W[1]-hardness for k. Weighted versions are W[1]-hard for vertex cover, and a constant-factor approximation parameterized by treewidth is given for Broadcast Independence.
Significance. If the central DP claims hold, the results meaningfully extend the known polynomial-time algorithm on trees to bounded-treewidth graphs and delineate the complexity landscape for these metric broadcast problems. The combination of positive FPT results with matching hardness results for pathwidth and vertex cover is a solid contribution to parameterized graph algorithms.
major comments (1)
- [FPT algorithm section] FPT algorithm section: the DP states assign f-values in 0..diameter to bag vertices and propagate max-coverage scalars c(x) = max(f(v)-dist(v,x)). This yields only triangle-inequality upper bounds on distances between broadcasters forgotten in different child subtrees. The transitions therefore cannot reliably enforce the exact global constraints dist(u,v) > f(u) and dist(u,v) > f(v) required for independence and packing; a concrete verification that the state augmentation suffices (or an explicit distance-to-interface table) is needed to support the claimed FPT runtime.
minor comments (2)
- The abstract states the main theorems clearly but the technical sections should include explicit DP recurrences or pseudocode rather than high-level descriptions of states and transitions.
- Eccentricity precomputation and the assumption that a nice tree decomposition of width tw is given should be stated as a separate preprocessing lemma with its polynomial-time bound.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of the DP.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [FPT algorithm section] FPT algorithm section: the DP states assign f-values in 0..diameter to bag vertices and propagate max-coverage scalars c(x) = max(f(v)-dist(v,x)). This yields only triangle-inequality upper bounds on distances between broadcasters forgotten in different child subtrees. The transitions therefore cannot reliably enforce the exact global constraints dist(u,v) > f(u) and dist(u,v) > f(v) required for independence and packing; a concrete verification that the state augmentation suffices (or an explicit distance-to-interface table) is needed to support the claimed FPT runtime.
Authors: We thank the referee for this observation on the DP states. The max-coverage scalars c(x) track the strongest influence from forgotten broadcasters to each bag vertex x. At join nodes the c values from the two children are combined by taking the pointwise maximum, and transitions check whether any c(x) would violate the independence or packing condition relative to an f-value on the bag (e.g., c(x) >= f(x) signals a potential hearing violation). Because any pair of broadcasters whose distance constraint is violated must have a path that passes through some bag vertex, the propagated coverage values detect the violation at the first common interface. We therefore maintain that the augmentation is sufficient for exact enforcement. To address the referee's request directly, the revised manuscript will contain an expanded subsection with a concrete verification of the transition rules, including a small example illustrating how the exact constraints dist(u,v) > f(u) and dist(u,v) > f(v) are preserved. We will also note the possibility of an explicit distance-to-interface table as an alternative formulation. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: FPT claims rest on standard treewidth DP machinery
full rationale
The paper derives FPT membership for Broadcast Independence and Broadcast Packing via dynamic programming on nice tree decompositions parameterized by treewidth plus diameter. This uses established techniques for assigning broadcast values (0 to diameter) to bag vertices and enforcing independence or packing constraints locally during bag transitions. Eccentricity precomputation is stated as polynomial-time and independent of the target result. The corollary extending the Bessy-Rautenbach tree algorithm cites external prior work by different authors. No self-definitional reductions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling appear in the derivation chain. The approach is self-contained against external benchmarks of treewidth DP.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- standard math Every connected graph has a well-defined eccentricity function ecc(v) for each vertex v.
- standard math Nice tree decompositions exist and can be used for dynamic programming on graphs of bounded treewidth.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Broadcasts on paths and cycles , journal =
Sabrina Bouchouika and Isma Bouchemakh and. Broadcasts on paths and cycles , journal =. 2020 , url =. doi:10.1016/J.DAM.2020.01.030 , timestamp =
-
[2]
Hiroshi Eto and Fengrui Guo and Eiji Miyano , title =. J. Comb. Optim. , volume =. 2014 , url =. doi:10.1007/S10878-012-9594-4 , timestamp =
-
[3]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.03516 , year=
Boundary and Hearing Independent Broadcasts in Graphs and Trees , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.03516 , year=
-
[4]
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization , volume=
Distance-independent set problems for bipartite and chordal graphs , author=. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization , volume=. 2014 , publisher=
work page 2014
-
[5]
International Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science , pages=
On distance-d independent set and other problems in graphs with “few” minimal separators , author=. International Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science , pages=. 2016 , organization=
work page 2016
-
[6]
Ioannis Katsikarelis and Michael Lampis and Vangelis Th. Paschos , authortext =. Structurally parameterized d-scattered set , journal =. 2022 , url =. doi:10.1016/J.DAM.2020.03.052 , timestamp =
-
[7]
On the broadcast independence number of locally uniform 2-lobsters , journal =
Messaouda Ahmane and Isma Bouchemakh and. On the broadcast independence number of locally uniform 2-lobsters , journal =. 2024 , url =. doi:10.7151/DMGT.2443 , timestamp =
-
[8]
On the broadcast independence number of caterpillars , journal =
Messaouda Ahmane and Isma Bouchemakh and. On the broadcast independence number of caterpillars , journal =. 2018 , url =. doi:10.1016/J.DAM.2018.03.017 , timestamp =
-
[9]
arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.05825 , year=
Broadcast independence and packing in certain classes of trees , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.05825 , year=
-
[10]
Girth, minimum degree, independence, and broadcast independence
Girth, minimum degree, independence, and broadcast independence , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.09565 , year=
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[11]
Algorithmic aspects of broadcast independence , journal =
St. Algorithmic aspects of broadcast independence , journal =. 2022 , url =. doi:10.1016/J.DAM.2022.03.001 , timestamp =
-
[12]
Relating broadcast independence and independence , journal =
St. Relating broadcast independence and independence , journal =. 2019 , url =. doi:10.1016/J.DISC.2019.07.005 , timestamp =
-
[13]
AKCE International Journal of Graphs and Combinatorics , volume=
Unsolved algorithmic problems on trees , author=. AKCE International Journal of Graphs and Combinatorics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=
work page 2006
-
[14]
6 Josep Díaz, Olli Pottonen, Maria J
Marek Cygan and Fedor V. Fomin and Lukasz Kowalik and Daniel Lokshtanov and D. Parameterized Algorithms , publisher =. 2015 , url =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21275-3 , isbn =
-
[15]
Jean E. Dunbar and David J. Erwin and Teresa W. Haynes and Sandra Mitchell Hedetniemi and Stephen T. Hedetniemi , title =. Discret. Appl. Math. , volume =. 2006 , url =. doi:10.1016/J.DAM.2005.07.009 , timestamp =
-
[16]
Heule, Marijn J. H. and Szeider, Stefan , year=. A SAT Approach to Clique-Width , ISBN=. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39071-5_24 , booktitle=
-
[17]
2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science , pages=
Solving connectivity problems parameterized by treewidth in single exponential time , author=. 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science , pages=. 2011 , organization=
work page 2011
-
[18]
The Graph Parameter Hierarchy , author=
-
[19]
Krzysztof Pietrzak , title =. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. , volume =. 2003 , url =. doi:10.1016/S0022-0000(03)00078-3 , timestamp =
- [20]
- [21]
-
[22]
Reducibility among combinatorial problems
Karp, Richard M. Reducibility among Combinatorial Problems. Complexity of Computer Computations: Proceedings of a symposium on the Complexity of Computer Computations. 1972. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2001-2_9
-
[23]
Discrete Mathematics , volume=
Optimal broadcast domination in polynomial time , author=. Discrete Mathematics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=
work page 2006
-
[24]
Jaroslav Nesetril and Patrice Ossona de Mendez , title =. 2012 , url =. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27875-4 , isbn =
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.