Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 42 references

Ultra-rapid broadband mid-infrared spectral tuning and sensing

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The authors show that spectral focusing in a chirped-pulse difference-frequency source produces a mid-IR pulse train that sweeps 2600–3780 cm−1 in one 6.3 µs shot, at up to 2 Mscans/s.

desk verdict Clever new architecture for fast mid-IR tuning, but the stated pulse parameters cannot support the claimed single-shot bandwidth, and the paper never shows a full-span single-shot spectrum. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09945 v1 pith:4KRW5FV5 submitted 2025-01-17 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Xiaoshuai Ma , Tianjian Lv , Xudong Zhu , Ming Yan , Heping Zeng This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph PACS 42.65.Ky42.62.Fi
keywords mid-infraredspectroscopyspectralfocusingdifferencefrequencygenerationelectro-opticcombasynchronousopticalsamplingfrequency-sweptlasertime-domainchemicalsensing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a mid-infrared source built from a chirped fiber laser and an asynchronous, frequency-modulated electro-optic comb can act as an ultra-rapid wavelength-swept laser. In one 6.3 µs scan it produces 380 mid-IR pulses, each about 8 cm−1 wide, whose center wavenumbers step from roughly 2600 to 3780 cm−1, a tuning speed of 5.6 THz/µs. Because the scan is continuous and inertial-free, a single photodetector and oscilloscope record the full absorption spectrum of a liquid sample, matching FTIR reference traces. If true, this gives condensed-phase spectroscopy a microsecond-time-scale alternative to Fourier-transform and dual-comb instruments without phase-stabilized combs or moving optics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is spectral focusing: two linearly chirped pulses with matched chirp parameter $\beta$ are mixed in a chirped-poling lithium niobate crystal, so the generated mid-IR pulse at delay $\tau$ has center frequency $f_D(\tau)=\Omega_0+\beta\tau$ and a bandwidth set by the chirp matching. The asynchronous dual-comb delay $\Delta\tau=\Delta f_r/f_r^2$ advances the relative delay pulse-to-pulse, producing 380 spectral points spaced by about 3.08 cm−1 across 1180 cm−1. The frequency-modulated EO comb, whose repetition rate is swept between $f_r-\Delta f_r$ and $f_r+\Delta f_r$ at modulation frequency $f_m$, turns the sparse asynchronous overlap into a continuous 100%-duty-cycle scan whose rate $2f_m$ is independent of spectral resolution; the CPLN crystal's linearly increasing poling period (23 to 31 µm) provides adiabatic quasi-phase-matching across the full tuning range.

What would settle it

Measure the cross-correlation between pump and signal pulses over a 300 ps delay range; if the overlap envelope does not extend beyond roughly ±45 ps, or if the reconstructed wavenumber axis from a known absorber is nonlinear at the spectral edges, the single-scan coverage claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that spectral-focusing difference-frequency generation, with the pump and signal chirp rates matched, maps the relative delay between two asynchronous pulse trains directly onto mid-IR color according to $f_D(\tau)=\Omega_0+\beta\tau$. Using a chirped Yb-fiber pump and an EO comb signal whose repetition frequency is modulated at $2f_m$, the authors generate a pulse-to-pulse wavelength sweep over 1180 cm−1 in about 6.3 µs at 5.6 THz/µs with 380 spectral elements, and raise the scan rate to 2 Mscans/s (60 THz/µs) at reduced element count (~30) and spacing (33 cm−1). They demonstrate the sensing value by reconstructing absorption spectra of benzene-ethanol, DMSO, ethanol, and flaxseed oil that agree with FTIR measurements, at single-shot SNR about 100 and ~3200 after 1000 averages.

Load-bearing premise

The full 1180 cm−1 span in one 6.3 µs scan rests on the assumption that the pump and signal pulses remain temporally overlapped and linearly chirped across the entire 292 ps delay sweep, even though the stated pump pulse duration is only about 90 ps.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single mid-IR detector and a 500 MS/s oscilloscope can capture a broadband absorption spectrum spanning more than 1000 cm−1 in a few microseconds, enabling monitoring of chemical dynamics on the microsecond scale.
  • Because the scan rate is set by the EO modulation frequency rather than by the asynchronous detuning, the instrument can hold spectral resolution constant while raising the scan rate, until the scan duration reaches the effective time window.
  • The source needs no cavity-length tuning, angle tuning, or phase stabilization of two coherent combs, simplifying time-domain broadband mid-IR spectroscopy.
  • In the 3–5 µm atmospheric window, the same wavelength-swept output could serve as illumination for scanner-free LIDAR and mid-IR ranging.
  • The resolution limit of about 8 cm−1 is adequate for condensed-phase samples with broad bands, but not for sharp gas-phase lines.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If the linear $f_D(\tau)=\Omega_0+\beta\tau$ mapping is exact and repeatable, the calibrated time-to-wavenumber axis is portable, so each instrument self-calibrates after one reference line and every later scan needs no spectrometer.
  • Editorial inference: The observed trade-off at 2 Mscans/s suggests a natural interleaving strategy—run two modulated combs at different phase offsets or chirp rates to restore fine point spacing while keeping the high scan rate.
  • Editorial inference: A decisive test of the full-coverage claim is to place two reference liquids with absorption lines near 2600 cm−1 and 3780 cm−1 in the beam and require both lines to appear in a single 6.3 µs trace.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a spectral-focusing difference-frequency-generation (DFG) source for rapid mid-infrared spectral tuning and sensing. A chirped 1.03 µm fiber-laser pump and a frequency-modulated electro-optic comb at 1.55 µm are mixed in a chirped-poling lithium niobate crystal; the idler center frequency changes linearly with the relative pump-signal delay, so a time-domain pulse train encodes a wavelength sweep. The authors claim single-shot 6.3 µs acquisition over 1180 cm⁻¹ (2600–3780 cm⁻¹) with 380 spectral elements at ~8 cm⁻¹ resolution, a tuning speed of 5.6 THz/µs, and a high-scan-rate mode reaching 2 Mscans/s (60 THz/µs) with about 30 elements. The sensing concept is tested on benzene/ethanol mixtures, DMSO, ethanol, and flaxseed oil, with reconstructed spectra compared against an FTIR reference.

Significance. If the headline claims are correct, this is a valuable step toward inertia-free, microsecond-scale broadband mid-infrared spectroscopy: it uses only a mode-locked fiber laser, a cavity-free EO comb, and a single photodetector, and the frequency-modulated asynchronous scheme is a sensible way to decouple scan rate from spectral resolution. The wavenumber axis is calibrated using known benzene lines and verified against FTIR, and the tuning relation in Eq. (2) is parameterized with a chirp parameter estimated from independent pulse characterization rather than fitted to the measured spectra, so the demonstration is not circular. The paper also provides concrete quantitative parameters (pulse durations, chirp rate, repetition rates, point spacing, SNR averaging behavior) that allow independent consistency checks. The concept, if properly supported, would have clear applications in chemical monitoring, flow cytometry, and mid-IR ranging.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.1 and Sec. 3.2] The stated pump parameters cannot support the claimed single-shot spectral coverage. The pump FWHM duration is reported as ~90 ps and the chirp parameter as β≈0.12 THz/ps = 4 cm⁻¹/ps. A single shot spanning 1180 cm⁻¹ (35.4 THz) requires a relative delay sweep of Δτ = 1180/4 ≈ 295 ps, whereas a 90 ps Gaussian pump envelope provides a usable overlap window of only about 90 ps, i.e., roughly 360 cm⁻¹ of linear chirp. At the delays needed to reach the edges of the claimed range (about ±145 ps), the pump intensity is essentially zero, so the idler elements at the extremes cannot be generated with the reported single-shot SNR of ~100. The paper needs to provide direct experimental evidence of a sufficiently long chirped-pump window (for example, a cross-correlation or a single-shot full-span spectrum), or the spectral-span and element-count claims must be revised to match the stated pump parameters.
  2. [Sec. 3.2] The asynchronous temporal interval is quoted as Δf_r/f_r² = 0.77 ps, but this is not consistent with the stated frequencies. With f_r = 60.5 MHz and Δf_r = 14 kHz, Δf_r/f_r² = 3.82 ps; with f_r = 302.5 MHz, it is 0.153 ps. The value 0.77 ps corresponds instead to Δf_r/(f_r f_s) = 14 kHz/(60.5 MHz × 302.5 MHz), i.e., the fifth-harmonic stepping relation. The formula in the text should be corrected and all frequencies explicitly defined, because this step size is the basis for the 3.08 cm⁻¹ spectral-point-spacing calibration.
  3. [Sec. 3.3 and Fig. 5(c,d)] The illustrative comparison in Fig. 5(c,d) assumes a 1000 cm⁻¹ spectral span and a 100 ps effective time window. With the β = 4 cm⁻¹/ps used in Sec. 3.2, 1000 cm⁻¹ requires 250 ps, not 100 ps; equivalently, a 1000 cm⁻¹ span in 100 ps requires β = 10 cm⁻¹/ps = 0.3 THz/ps, which is inconsistent with the stated 0.12 THz/ps chirp of both lasers. Please clarify whether Fig. 5(c,d) is a generic illustration using different parameters, and if so state the actual β and delay window used for the high-scan-rate traces in Fig. 5(a,b).
  4. [Sec. 3.2, Figs. 3(c) and 4(c)] The central claim of a single-shot full-span spectrum is not directly demonstrated. Figure 3(c), described as a single measurement, displays only a portion of the spectral range, while Figure 4(c), which covers 2600–3780 cm⁻¹, is obtained from 200 consecutive measurements. To support the 6.3 µs, 1180 cm⁻¹ single-shot claim, the authors should show a reconstructed single-shot spectrum over the full claimed range, or explicitly state the spectral sub-range covered by one trace.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 3.1] The wavelength-to-wavenumber conversion is inconsistent: '2600 to 3700 nm' corresponds to 3846 to 2703 cm⁻¹, not '2703 to 3704 cm⁻¹'. Please correct the conversion and reconcile the range used in the abstract (2600–3780 cm⁻¹) with that shown in Fig. 2(d).
  2. [Eqs. (1) and (2)] Please define f_c in Eq. (1) and Ω0 in Eq. (2), and state explicitly that Ω0 is the difference of the pump and signal center frequencies, to avoid ambiguity.
  3. [Fig. 2(c)] Please specify whether the quoted pulse durations (90 ps and 750 fs) are deconvolved FWHM values or raw autocorrelation widths, and state the assumed pulse shape.
  4. [Sec. 3.2] The sentence 'the spectral resolution is set by the upper bound of the point spacing and the pulse spectral width' is unclear; please specify how the 8 cm⁻¹ resolution is obtained from the ~3.1 cm⁻¹ point spacing and the ~8 cm⁻¹ pulse spectral width.
  5. [References] Reference [26] is an arXiv preprint; please check whether a peer-reviewed version is available and cite it if appropriate.
  6. [Fig. 3(d)] For the SNR-versus-averages fit, it would be helpful to report the fitted slope and the uncertainty, to substantiate the √N scaling shown by the line.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the tuning relation and wavenumber axis are established by independent pulse characterization and external FTIR/benzene calibration, not by fitting the target spectra.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The time-to-wavenumber mapping f_D(tau) = Omega0 + beta*tau is the standard spectral-focusing relation, and beta is estimated from independent measurements of spectral FWHM and pulse duration (beta ~= Delta f / Delta tau ~= 0.12 THz/ps for both lasers), not from the reconstructed spectra. The spectral point spacing (3.08 cm^-1) is calculated from the asynchronous temporal interval and beta, and the absolute axis is calibrated with known benzene line centers before the mixture spectrum is measured; agreement with FTIR validates the result. The paper does cite prior work by the same group for frequency-modulated dual-comb operation (e.g., Refs. [28], [30], [36]), but those citations are not load-bearing for the present claim: the scan-rate advantage is demonstrated directly in Sec. 3.3, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the self-citations. The skeptic's concern about pump pulse duration (~90 ps) versus the claimed 1180 cm^-1 span is a parameter-consistency question, not a circularity; the text reports a supercontinuum pump with a broad spectrum, but whether the chirped window actually supports the full claimed range is an empirical validation issue outside the definitional identity of the method. Therefore no circular step reduces the central result to its inputs; at most there are minor non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the linear-chirp time-frequency mapping, the availability of a sufficiently long temporal overlap window, and the FM scheme's duty-cycle behavior. No new physical entities are introduced. The only numerical input is the chirp parameter beta, which has no reported uncertainty, and the paper contains an unresolved inconsistency between the stated pump duration and the claimed delay sweep.

free parameters (1)
  • chirp parameter beta = ~0.12 THz/ps
    Estimated as beta = Delta_f / Delta_tau from measured spectral FWHM and autocorrelation durations in Section 3.1. The time-to-wavenumber conversion, the 3.08 cm-1 point spacing, and the reported tuning speeds all scale with beta, yet no uncertainty is given.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Both pump and signal pulses are linearly chirped with the same chirp rate beta, so the idler frequency follows f_D(tau) = Omega0 + beta*tau linearly across the full tuning range.
    Section 2, Eq. (2), and Section 3.1. The spectral reconstruction and point spacing assume this linear mapping; nonlinear chirp or chirp mismatch would distort the wavenumber axis and resolution.
  • domain assumption The relative delay can be scanned over at least 292 ps while the pump and signal pulses still overlap in the crystal, providing the full 1180 cm-1 chirp window.
    Section 3.2, where 380 pulses with 0.77 ps steps imply a 292 ps delay sweep. The stated 90 ps pump duration does not support this window, so the assumption is load-bearing and currently unsupported.
  • domain assumption Frequency-modulating the EO comb repetition rate at fm creates a triangular delay scan with 100% duty cycle and a scan rate of 2fm, without changing spectral point spacing or resolution, as long as the scan duration matches the effective time window.
    Section 2, Fig. 1(d), and Section 3.3. The high-scan-rate claims and the claimed independence of scan rate from spectral resolution rest on this assumption.
  • domain assumption The chirped-poling lithium niobate crystal provides adiabatic quasi-phase matching over the full 1180 cm-1 idler range.
    Section 3.1. The broad spectral coverage claim depends on the crystal's linearly increasing poling period (23 to 31 um) supporting the entire DFG band.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultra-rapid broadband mid-infrared spectral tuning and sensing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4KRW5FV5

@misc{pith2026250109945,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultra-rapid broadband mid-infrared spectral tuning and sensing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4KRW5FV5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09945}
}
read the original abstract

Tunable mid-infrared lasers are essential for optical sensing and imaging. Existing technologies, however, face challenges in simultaneously achieving broadband spectral tunability and ultra-rapid scan rates, limiting their utility in dynamic scenarios such as real-time characterization of multiple molecular absorption bands. Here, we present a high-speed approach for broadband wavelength sweeping in the mid-infrared region, leveraging spectral focusing via difference frequency generation between a chirped fiber laser and an asynchronous, frequency-modulated electro-optic comb. This method enables pulse-to-pulse spectral tuning at a speed of 5.6 THz/us with 380 elements. Applied to spectroscopic sensing, our technique achieves broad spectral coverage (2600-3780 cm-1) with moderate spectral resolution (8 cm-1) and rapid acquisition times (6.3 us). Notably, the controllable electro-optic comb facilitates high scan rates of up to 2 Mscans/s across the full spectral range (corresponding to a speed of 60 THz/us), with trade-offs in number of elements (~30) and spectral point spacing or resolution (33 cm-1). Nevertheless, these capabilities make our platform highly promising for applications such as flow cytometry, chemical reaction monitoring, and mid-IR ranging and imaging.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.09945 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Basic principles. Schematics of (a) difference frequency generation, (b) spectral focusing, and (c) optical sampling with asynchronous pulses. (d) Modulating the repetition frequency of signal pulses to improve the scan rate. CPLN, chirped-poling lithium niobate; 𝑡, measurement time; 𝜏, the relative time delay between the pump and signal pulses; 𝑓𝑟 , the repetition frequency of the pump laser; ∆𝑓𝑟 , the repetition f… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Generation of broadband tunable mid-infrared light. (a) Experimental setup. CW, continuous-wave laser; IM, intensity modulator; PPG, picosecond pulse generator; DC-EDFA, double-clad Er-doped fiber amplifier; HNLF, highly nonlinear fiber; SMF, single-mode fiber; YDFA, Yb-doped fiber amplifier; Col, fiber collimator; M, mirror; λ/2, half-wave plate; PCF, photonic crystal fiber; DM, dichroic mirror; CPLN, chirped-polin… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Results of temporal measurements and spectral reconstruction. (a) Pulse trains recorded [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Broadband spectral results. The reconstructed spectra of (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spectral tuning at high scan rates. Mid-IR pulse traces are recorded at (a) 2𝑓𝑚=600 kHz and ∆𝑓𝑟=60 kHz and (b) 2𝑓𝑚=2 MHz and ∆𝑓𝑟=200 kHz. A comparison of spectral parameters between (c) unmodulated and (d) frequency-modulated asynchronous schemes. For the plots in (c) …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) in the process industries - A review,

    M. Lackner, "Tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) in the process industries - A review," Rev. Chem. Eng. 23, 65-147 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    A Time-Encoded Technique for fibre-based hyperspectral broadband stimulated Raman microscopy,

    S. Karpf, M. Eibl, W. Wieser, et al., "A Time-Encoded Technique for fibre-based hyperspectral broadband stimulated Raman microscopy," Nat. Commun. 6, 6 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Time-stretch LiDAR as a spectrally scanned time-of-flight ranging camera,

    Y. S. Jiang, S. Karpf, and B. Jalali, "Time-stretch LiDAR as a spectrally scanned time-of-flight ranging camera," Nat. Photonics 14, 14-18 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Sensitivity of coherent dual-comb spectroscopy,

    N. R. Newbury, I. Coddington, and W. Swann, "Sensitivity of coherent dual-comb spectroscopy," Opt. Express 18, 7929-7945 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Dual-comb spectroscopy,

    I. Coddington, N. Newbury, and W. Swann, "Dual-comb spectroscopy," Optica 3, 414-426 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    A phase-stable dual-comb interferometer,

    Z. Chen, M. Yan, T. W. Hä nsch, et al., "A phase-stable dual-comb interferometer," Nat. Commun. 9, 3035 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Dual-comb optomechanical spectroscopy,

    X. Ren, J. Pan, M. Yan, et al., "Dual-comb optomechanical spectroscopy," Nat. Commun. 14, 5037 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Frequency-agile dual-comb spectroscopy,

    G. Millot, S. Pitois, M. Yan, et al., "Frequency-agile dual-comb spectroscopy," Nat. Photonics 10, 27-30 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Coherent dual-comb spectroscopy at high signal-to-noise ratio,

    I. Coddington, W. Swann, and N. Newbury, "Coherent dual-comb spectroscopy at high signal-to-noise ratio," Phys. Rev. A: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 82, 043817 (2010)

    2010

  2. [10]

    High-coherence mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy spanning 2.6 to 5.2 μm,

    G. Ycas, F. R. Giorgetta, E. Baumann, et al., "High-coherence mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy spanning 2.6 to 5.2 μm," Nat. Photonics 12, 202-208 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Spatio-spectral 4D coherent ranging using a flutter-wavelength-swept laser,

    D. Jeong, H. Jang, M. U. Jung, et al., "Spatio-spectral 4D coherent ranging using a flutter-wavelength-swept laser," Nat. Commun. 15, 1110 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Widely tunable and narrow-linewidth chip-scale lasers from near-ultraviolet to near-infrared wavelengths,

    M. Corato-Zanarella, A. Gil-Molina, X. Ji, et al., "Widely tunable and narrow-linewidth chip-scale lasers from near-ultraviolet to near-infrared wavelengths," Nat. Photonics 17, 157-164 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Advances in mid-infrared spectroscopy for chemical analysis,

    J. Haas and B. Mizaikoff, "Advances in mid-infrared spectroscopy for chemical analysis," Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 9, 45-68 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Mid infrared lasers for remote sensing applications,

    B. M. Walsh, H. R. Lee, and N. P. Barnes, "Mid infrared lasers for remote sensing applications," J. Lumin. 169, 400-405 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    High-resolution mid-infrared single-photon upconversion ranging,

    S. Jiang, K. Huang, T. Yu, et al., "High-resolution mid-infrared single-photon upconversion ranging," Photonics Res. 12, 1294-1302 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Wide-field mid-infrared hyperspectral imaging beyond video rate,

    J. Fang, K. Huang, R. Qin, et al., "Wide-field mid-infrared hyperspectral imaging beyond video rate," Nat. Commun. 15, 1811 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Recent progress in quantum cascade lasers and applications,

    C. Gmachl, F. Capasso, D. L. Sivco, et al., "Recent progress in quantum cascade lasers and applications," Rep. Prog. Phys. 64, 1533 (2001)

    2001

  10. [18]

    Quantum cascade lasers: 20 years of challenges,

    M. S. Vitiello, G. Scalari, B. Williams, et al., "Quantum cascade lasers: 20 years of challenges," Opt. Express 23, 5167-5182 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Widely tunable mode-hop free external cavity quantum cascade laser for high resolution spectroscopic applications,

    G. Wysocki, R. F. Curl, F. K. Tittel, et al., "Widely tunable mode-hop free external cavity quantum cascade laser for high resolution spectroscopic applications," Appl. Phys. B 81, 769-777 (2005)

    2005

  12. [20]

    External cavity quantum cascade lasers with ultra rapid acousto-optic tuning,

    A. Lyakh, R. Barron-Jimenez, I. Dunayevskiy, et al., "External cavity quantum cascade lasers with ultra rapid acousto-optic tuning," Appl. Phys. Lett. 106(2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Femtosecond pulses from a mid-infrared quantum cascade laser,

    P. Tä schler, M. Bertrand, B. Schneider, et al., "Femtosecond pulses from a mid-infrared quantum cascade laser," Nat. Photonics 15, 919-924 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Active mode locking of quantum cascade lasers in an external ring cavity,

    D. Revin, M. Hemingway, Y. Wang, et al., "Active mode locking of quantum cascade lasers in an external ring cavity," Nat. Commun. 7, 11440 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Graphene-coupled terahertz semiconductor lasers for enhanced passive frequency comb operation,

    H. Li, M. Yan, W. Wan, et al., "Graphene-coupled terahertz semiconductor lasers for enhanced passive frequency comb operation," Adv. Sci. 6, 1900460 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Mid-infrared optical parametric oscillators and frequency combs for molecular spectroscopy,

    M. Vainio and L. Halonen, "Mid-infrared optical parametric oscillators and frequency combs for molecular spectroscopy," Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 4266-4294 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    Broadly, independent-tunable, dual-wavelength mid-infrared ultrafast optical parametric oscillator,

    Y. Jin, S. M. Cristescu, F. J. Harren, et al., "Broadly, independent-tunable, dual-wavelength mid-infrared ultrafast optical parametric oscillator," Opt. Express 23, 20418-20427 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Fiber-based mid-infrared frequency-swept laser at 50 MScans/s via frequency down-conversion of time-stretched pulses,

    M. Shoshin, T. Kageyama, T. Nakamura, et al., "Fiber-based mid-infrared frequency-swept laser at 50 MScans/s via frequency down-conversion of time-stretched pulses," arXiv:2501.01641 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Mid-infrared electro-optic dual-comb spectroscopy with feedforward frequency stepping,

    X. Ren, H. Dai, D. Li, et al., "Mid-infrared electro-optic dual-comb spectroscopy with feedforward frequency stepping," Opt. Lett. 45, 776-779 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy with electro-optic modulators,

    M. Yan, P.-L. Luo, K. Iwakuni, et al., "Mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy with electro-optic modulators," Light Sci. Appl. 6, e17076-e17076 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Delay-spectral focusing dual-comb coherent Raman spectroscopy for rapid detection in the high-wavenumber region,

    Y. Zhang, M. Lu, T. Wu, et al., "Delay-spectral focusing dual-comb coherent Raman spectroscopy for rapid detection in the high-wavenumber region," ACS Photonics 9, 1385-1394 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Ultrahigh-speed coherent anti-stokes Raman spectroscopy with a hybrid dual- comb source,

    T. Lv, B. Han, M. Yan, et al., "Ultrahigh-speed coherent anti-stokes Raman spectroscopy with a hybrid dual- comb source," ACS Photonics 10, 2964-2971 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Efficient generation of< 3-cm-1 bandwidth mid-IR pulses by difference-frequency mixing of chirped pulses,

    G. Veitas, R. Danielius, and E. Schreiber, "Efficient generation of< 3-cm-1 bandwidth mid-IR pulses by difference-frequency mixing of chirped pulses," JOSA B 19, 1411-1418 (2002)

    2002

  24. [32]

    Generation of narrowband subpicosecond mid-infrared pulses via difference frequency mixing of chirped near-infrared pulses,

    F. O. Koller, K. Haiser, M. Huber, et al., "Generation of narrowband subpicosecond mid-infrared pulses via difference frequency mixing of chirped near-infrared pulses," Opt. Lett. 32, 3339-3341 (2007)

    2007

  25. [33]

    Ultrafast time-domain spectroscopy based on high-speed asynchronous optical sampling,

    A. Bartels, R. Cerna, C. Kistner, et al., "Ultrafast time-domain spectroscopy based on high-speed asynchronous optical sampling," Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78(2007)

    2007

  26. [34]

    Asynchronous optical sampling with arbitrary detuning between laser repetition rates,

    L. Antonucci, X. Solinas, A. Bonvalet, et al., "Asynchronous optical sampling with arbitrary detuning between laser repetition rates," Opt. Express 20, 17928-17937 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Ultrafast time-domain spectroscopy system using 10 GHz asynchronous optical sampling with 100 kHz scan rate,

    O. Kliebisch, D. C. Heinecke, and T. Dekorsy, "Ultrafast time-domain spectroscopy system using 10 GHz asynchronous optical sampling with 100 kHz scan rate," Opt. Express 24, 29930-29940 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Broadband Up-Conversion Mid-Infrared Time-Stretch Spectroscopy,

    Z. Wen, B. Peng, M. Yan, et al., "Broadband Up-Conversion Mid-Infrared Time-Stretch Spectroscopy," Laser Photonics Rev. 18, 2300630 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Three-dimensional and C-mode OCT imaging with a compact, frequency swept laser source at 1300 nm,

    R. Huber, M. Wojtkowski, J. G. Fujimoto, et al., "Three-dimensional and C-mode OCT imaging with a compact, frequency swept laser source at 1300 nm," Opt. Express 13, 10523-10538 (2005)

    2005

  30. [38]

    Resolution of spectral focusing in coherent Raman imaging,

    M. Mohseni, C. Polzer, and T. Hellerer, "Resolution of spectral focusing in coherent Raman imaging," Opt. Express 26, 10230-10241 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Time stretch and its applications,

    A. Mahjoubfar, D. V. Churkin, S. Barland, et al., "Time stretch and its applications," Nat. Photonics 11, 341- 351 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Upconversion time-stretch infrared spectroscopy,

    K. Hashimoto, T. Nakamura, T. Kageyama, et al., "Upconversion time-stretch infrared spectroscopy," Light Sci. Appl. 12, 48 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Time-stretch infrared spectroscopy,

    A. Kawai, K. Hashimoto, T. Dougakiuchi, et al., "Time-stretch infrared spectroscopy," Commun. Phys. 3, 152 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    High-efficiency and broadband on-chip electro-optic frequency comb generators,

    Y. Hu, M. Yu, B. Buscaino, et al., "High-efficiency and broadband on-chip electro-optic frequency comb generators," Nat. Photonics 16, 679-685 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.