Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Using Ego-Clusters to Measure Network Effects at LinkedIn

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1903.08755 v1 pith:4M5UQ3XT submitted 2019-03-20 cs.SI stat.AP

classification cs.SIstat.AP
keywords networkassumptioneffectexperimentationonlyrandomizationtreatmenteffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

A network effect is said to take place when a new feature not only impacts the people who receive it, but also other users of the platform, like their connections or the people who follow them. This very common phenomenon violates the fundamental assumption underpinning nearly all enterprise experimentation systems, the stable unit treatment value assumption (SUTVA). When this assumption is broken, a typical experimentation platform, which relies on Bernoulli randomization for assignment and two-sample t-test for assessment of significance, will not only fail to account for the network effect, but potentially give highly biased results. This paper outlines a simple and scalable solution to measuring network effects, using ego-network randomization, where a cluster is comprised of an "ego" (a focal individual), and her "alters" (the individuals she is immediately connected to). Our approach aims at maintaining representativity of clusters, avoiding strong modeling assumption, and significantly increasing power compared to traditional cluster-based randomization. In particular, it does not require product-specific experiment design, or high levels of investment from engineering teams, and does not require any changes to experimentation and analysis platforms, as it only requires assigning treatment an individual level. Each user either has the feature or does not, and no complex manipulation of interactions between users is needed. It focuses on measuring the one-out network effect (i.e the effect of my immediate connection's treatment on me), and gives reasonable estimates at a very low setup cost, allowing us to run such experiments dozens of times a year.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scalable Network-Aware Experiment Design for Two-Sided Marketplaces

    stat.AP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Develops scalable clustering methods for network-aware A/B testing in two-sided markets that cut spillover while boosting sample size and power, plus a theoretical bias correction.

  2. Robust and efficient multiple-unit switchback experimentation

    stat.ME 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Regular Balanced Switchback Designs combine item- and time-randomization with balanced treatment counts, yielding unbiased, lower-variance estimates of average treatment effects that are robust to carryover effects.

  3. Algorithm Adaptation Bias in Recommendation System Online Experiments

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Recommendation-system A/B tests can systematically underestimate a new algorithm's true deployment effect because a small treatment group cannot trigger the full ecosystem's feedback loops, a bias the paper formalizes...

Pith tools