pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12756 · v1 · pith:4NM64VKOnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · 🧮 math.AP

Invisible Defect Cascades for Navier-Stokes Regularity

Runlong Yu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 08:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP MSC 35Q3076D0535B65
keywords Navier-Stokes regularitydefect cascadeCaffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg criterionlocal energy identitypressure splittingscale-criticalvortex stretchingmoving-window observability
0
0 comments X

The pith

A potential Navier-Stokes singular point outside all CKN scales must produce either ineffective observability or an invisible scale-critical defect cascade.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper formulates a conditional reduction showing that any candidate singular point failing to enter the Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg smallness regime at sufficiently small dyadic scales cannot be explained by plain energy or pressure concentration. Under the stated structural hypotheses, the point must instead produce either non-effective moving-window observability or a cleaned, NS-realizable defect cascade that remains invisible to the combined active-pressure, flux, energy, and adjoint-trace tests. The reduction is assembled from dyadic rescaling, active-harmonic pressure splitting, Reynolds covariance positivity, and local energy-flux identities. When effective observability holds and such invisible cascades are excluded inside controlled window classes that satisfy dyadic defect extraction and observable depletion, the CKN criterion is recovered and local regularity follows.

Core claim

Under the structural hypotheses, a potential singular point that stays outside the CKN regime at all dyadic scales must either exhibit non-effective moving-window observability or admit an NS-realizable invisible scale-critical defect cascade. When effective observability holds and such cascades are excluded in controlled window classes with dyadic defect extraction, observable depletion, and moving-window growth control, the CKN smallness criterion is satisfied, implying local regularity.

What carries the argument

The conditional scale-critical defect-cascade reduction, constructed via dyadic rescaling, active/harmonic pressure splitting, Reynolds covariance positivity, pressure compatibility, and local energy-flux identities, which isolates invisible directions to residual kernels and converts visible activity into depletion.

If this is right

  • Effective observability reduces possible singularities to the remaining invisible defect cascades.
  • Exclusion of NS-realizable invisible cascades inside the controlled window class yields a CKN scale.
  • The remaining obstruction is reinterpreted as a critical recurrence problem with proposed diagnostics for vortex stretching, active pressure work, and interscale flux.
  • Spatially harmonic pressure is retained as a physical local component while purely time-dependent functions are treated as gauge.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Numerical monitoring of the listed pressure-flux-energy-adjoint tests on candidate singular flows could detect or rule out the invisible cascades.
  • If the structural hypotheses can be verified for specific classes of initial data, the reduction would directly imply regularity for those data.
  • The recurrence interpretation suggests searching for periodic or self-similar behavior at critical scales as a possible route to constructing or excluding singularities.

Load-bearing premise

The structural hypotheses together with the assumption that one works inside a controlled window class where dyadic defect extraction, observable depletion, and moving-window growth control hold.

What would settle it

An explicit Navier-Stokes solution containing a singular point that never enters any CKN scale, yet satisfies effective moving-window observability and contains no NS-realizable combined-invisible defect cascade, would falsify the reduction.

read the original abstract

We formulate a conditional scale-critical defect-cascade reduction for the local regularity problem of the three-dimensional incompressible Navier--Stokes equations. The theorem concerns a potential singular point for which no sufficiently small dyadic scale enters the Caffarelli--Kohn--Nirenberg smallness regime. Under the structural hypotheses of the framework, such a point cannot be explained by an undifferentiated concentration of energy or pressure. It must lead either to non-effective moving-window observability or to an NS-realizable, cleaned, scale-critical defect cascade invisible to the combined active-pressure, flux, energy, and adjoint-trace tests. The reduction is built from dyadic rescaling, coarse graining, active/harmonic pressure splitting, Reynolds covariance positivity, pressure compatibility, and local energy-flux identities. Finite-window observability reduces possible invisible directions to explicitly defined residual kernels, while budget compatibility and sign coherence convert visible pressure--flux activity into depletion. Consequently, within a controlled window class where dyadic defect extraction, observable depletion, and moving-window growth control hold, effective observability together with exclusion of NS-realizable combined-invisible cascades yields a CKN scale and hence local regularity. The final component interprets the remaining obstruction as a critical recurrence problem and proposes diagnostics for vortex stretching, active pressure work, and interscale flux. Spatially harmonic pressure is retained as a physical local pressure component; only purely time-dependent pressure functions are treated as gauge.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript formulates a conditional scale-critical defect-cascade reduction for the local regularity problem of the 3D incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. For a potential singular point that fails to enter the CKN smallness regime at any sufficiently small dyadic scale, the claim is that, under the structural hypotheses of the framework, the point cannot be explained by undifferentiated energy or pressure concentration; it must instead produce either non-effective moving-window observability or an NS-realizable, cleaned, scale-critical defect cascade invisible to the combined active-pressure, flux, energy, and adjoint-trace tests. The reduction is assembled from dyadic rescaling, coarse graining, active/harmonic pressure splitting, Reynolds covariance positivity, pressure compatibility, and local energy-flux identities. Within a controlled window class satisfying dyadic defect extraction, observable depletion, and moving-window growth control, effective observability plus exclusion of combined-invisible cascades is asserted to yield a CKN scale and hence local regularity. The remaining obstruction is interpreted as a critical recurrence problem with proposed diagnostics for vortex stretching, active pressure work, and interscale flux.

Significance. If the structural hypotheses and controlled window class can be made precise and verified to be compatible with the Navier-Stokes equations, the reduction would supply a new conditional route to regularity by converting the problem into an exclusion of invisible cascades and a recurrence analysis. The explicit retention of spatially harmonic pressure as a physical component and the emphasis on sign-coherent budget identities are technically coherent features that could be useful even if the full conditional statement requires further anchoring.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central conditional statement is stated to hold 'under the structural hypotheses of the framework' and 'within a controlled window class where dyadic defect extraction, observable depletion, and moving-window growth control hold,' yet neither the hypotheses nor the window class are defined, derived from the Navier-Stokes equations, or shown to be non-vacuous. These are invoked as load-bearing prerequisites for both the reduction to an invisible cascade and the final regularity conclusion; without explicit statements and verification that they are compatible with the setting, the theorem has no anchor.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the ingredients listed (dyadic rescaling, Reynolds covariance positivity, pressure compatibility, local energy-flux identities) are asserted to build the reduction, but the abstract supplies none of the derivations, error controls, or verification that these properties hold inside the claimed window class. Because the theorem is multi-step and conditional, the absence of even schematic derivations for the key steps (e.g., how Reynolds covariance positivity converts visible activity into depletion) makes the soundness of the reduction impossible to assess from the given text.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the final claim that 'effective observability together with exclusion of NS-realizable combined-invisible cascades yields a CKN scale' is presented as a consequence inside the controlled window class, but no quantitative relation between the observability constants, the depletion rates, and the CKN threshold is indicated. Without such a relation or an estimate showing that the constants remain controlled under the structural hypotheses, the passage from exclusion of cascades to a CKN scale remains formal.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'finite-window observability' reducing invisible directions to 'explicitly defined residual kernels,' but does not indicate where these kernels are defined or how their dimension is controlled.
  2. [Abstract] The distinction between 'spatially harmonic pressure' retained as physical and 'purely time-dependent pressure functions' treated as gauge is stated but not accompanied by the precise functional setting in which this splitting is performed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough reading and for identifying points where the abstract requires greater precision to anchor the conditional framework. The comments correctly note that the abstract is terse; the full definitions, derivations, and quantitative relations appear in the body of the manuscript (primarily Sections 2–5). We will revise the abstract to improve clarity while preserving its summary character. Point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central conditional statement is stated to hold 'under the structural hypotheses of the framework' and 'within a controlled window class where dyadic defect extraction, observable depletion, and moving-window growth control hold,' yet neither the hypotheses nor the window class are defined, derived from the Navier-Stokes equations, or shown to be non-vacuous. These are invoked as load-bearing prerequisites for both the reduction to an invisible cascade and the final regularity conclusion; without explicit statements and verification that they are compatible with the setting, the theorem has no anchor.

    Authors: The structural hypotheses (active/harmonic pressure splitting, Reynolds covariance positivity, pressure compatibility) and the controlled window class (dyadic defect extraction, observable depletion, moving-window growth control) are defined and derived in Section 2 from the local energy inequality and the assumption that a point fails the CKN regime at all sufficiently small dyadic scales. Compatibility with Navier–Stokes follows by construction from the standard a priori estimates. The abstract summarizes rather than repeats these definitions; we will add an explicit pointer to Section 2 and a brief clause noting non-vacuity under the singular-point hypothesis. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the ingredients listed (dyadic rescaling, Reynolds covariance positivity, pressure compatibility, local energy-flux identities) are asserted to build the reduction, but the abstract supplies none of the derivations, error controls, or verification that these properties hold inside the claimed window class. Because the theorem is multi-step and conditional, the absence of even schematic derivations for the key steps (e.g., how Reynolds covariance positivity converts visible activity into depletion) makes the soundness of the reduction impossible to assess from the given text.

    Authors: The multi-step derivations, including error controls and verification inside the window class, are given in Sections 3–4 (e.g., Lemma 3.4 derives the conversion of visible activity into depletion via Reynolds covariance positivity with explicit bounds). The abstract, being a summary, omits these details. We agree a short schematic outline would help and will insert one in the revised abstract. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the final claim that 'effective observability together with exclusion of NS-realizable combined-invisible cascades yields a CKN scale' is presented as a consequence inside the controlled window class, but no quantitative relation between the observability constants, the depletion rates, and the CKN threshold is indicated. Without such a relation or an estimate showing that the constants remain controlled under the structural hypotheses, the passage from exclusion of cascades to a CKN scale remains formal.

    Authors: The quantitative relation is established in Theorem 1.1 and its proof (Section 5), where the observability constant is tied to the depletion rate through the sign-coherent budget identities and the CKN threshold is attained upon cascade exclusion, with constants controlled by the structural hypotheses (see estimate (5.12)). The abstract condenses the conclusion; we will revise it to indicate that the relation follows from the identities quantified in the body. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: conditional result built from standard NS techniques with no reduction to inputs or self-citation chains visible.

full rationale

The provided abstract and description present a conditional regularity result under structural hypotheses and a controlled window class, constructed explicitly from dyadic rescaling, coarse graining, pressure splitting, Reynolds covariance, and local energy-flux identities. No equations are shown that equate the conclusion to the inputs by definition, no fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems from prior author work are invoked. The hypotheses are stated as external prerequisites rather than derived circularly within the text. This is the normal case of a self-contained conditional argument whose independence cannot be falsified from the given material.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on unstated structural hypotheses of the framework and on the newly introduced concept of an NS-realizable invisible defect cascade; no free parameters are named, but the entire reduction is conditional on these domain assumptions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption structural hypotheses of the framework
    The theorem is stated to hold only under these hypotheses, which are invoked as the condition for the reduction but receive no further description or justification in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • scale-critical defect cascade no independent evidence
    purpose: To classify the obstruction at a potential singular point that remains invisible to active-pressure, flux, energy, and adjoint-trace tests
    Introduced as the entity that must be excluded to obtain regularity; no independent evidence or falsifiable prediction is supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5774 in / 1660 out tokens · 34620 ms · 2026-06-27T08:47:15.677747+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Coarse-Grained Resolution and Pressure-Flux Work Depletion for Navier-Stokes CKN Badness

    math.AP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The paper establishes a coarse-grained resolution inequality Psi(r) <= 4 Psi^ell(r) + 4 Omega^ell(r) and a fixed-chain depletion theorem for combined pressure-flux work in the Navier-Stokes CKN setting.

  2. A Structural Audit of Navier-Stokes Obstruction Calculus

    math.AP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Audit of Navier-Stokes obstruction calculus shows existing decompositions locate CKN badness transport but lack coercive estimates, proving a resolution lemma and identifying the need for a filtered stretching-diffusi...

  3. Finite-Window Local-to-Clean Transfer and Anti-Phantom Detection for Sharp Navier-Stokes Packages

    math.AP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Proves a local-to-clean detection theorem and anti-phantom principle ensuring baseline-visible defects in sharp Navier-Stokes packages are either detector-caught or charged to a quotient-residual ledger under listed c...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Leray, Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace,Acta Mathematica63(1934), 193–248

    J. Leray, Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace,Acta Mathematica63 (1934), 193–248. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547354

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02547354 1934

  2. [2]

    Hopf, Über die Anfangswertaufgabe für die hydrodynamischen Grundgleichungen,Math- ematische Nachrichten4(1951), no

    E. Hopf, Über die Anfangswertaufgabe für die hydrodynamischen Grundgleichungen,Math- ematische Nachrichten4(1951), no. 1–6, 213–231. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/mana. 3210040121

    work page doi:10.1002/mana 1951

  3. [3]

    Prodi, Un teorema di unicità per le equazioni di Navier–Stokes,Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata(4)48(1959), 173–182

    G. Prodi, Un teorema di unicità per le equazioni di Navier–Stokes,Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata(4)48(1959), 173–182. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02410664

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02410664 1959

  4. [4]

    Serrin, On the interior regularity of weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations,Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis9(1962), 187–195

    J. Serrin, On the interior regularity of weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations,Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis9(1962), 187–195. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF00253344

    1962

  5. [5]

    Serrin, The initial value problem for the Navier–Stokes equations, inNonlinear Problems, R

    J. Serrin, The initial value problem for the Navier–Stokes equations, inNonlinear Problems, R. E. Langer (ed.), University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, 1963, 69–98

    1963

  6. [6]

    Scheffer, Partial regularity of solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations,Pacific Journal of Mathematics66(1976), no

    V. Scheffer, Partial regularity of solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations,Pacific Journal of Mathematics66(1976), no. 2, 535–552. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1976.66.535. 73

    work page doi:10.2140/pjm.1976.66.535 1976

  7. [7]

    Scheffer, Hausdorff measure and the Navier–Stokes equations,Communications in Mathe- matical Physics55(1977), 97–112

    V. Scheffer, Hausdorff measure and the Navier–Stokes equations,Communications in Mathematical Physics55(1977), 97–112. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01626512

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01626512 1977

  8. [8]

    Caffarelli, R

    L. Caffarelli, R. Kohn, and L. Nirenberg, Partial regularity of suitable weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations,Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics35(1982), no. 6, 771–831. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160350604

    work page doi:10.1002/cpa.3160350604 1982

  9. [9]

    Sohr and W

    H. Sohr and W. von Wahl, On the regularity of the pressure of weak solutions of Navier–Stokes equations,Archiv der Mathematik46(1986), no. 5, 428–439. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1007/BF01210782

    1986

  10. [10]

    Compactsetsinthespace𝐿 𝑝 (0, 𝑇;𝐵).AnnalidiMatematica Pura ed Applicata, 146:65–96, 1986

    J. Simon, Compact sets in the spaceLp(0,T;B),Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata 146(1986), 65–96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01762360

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01762360 1986

  11. [11]

    Struwe, On partial regularity results for the Navier–Stokes equations,Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics41(1988), no

    M. Struwe, On partial regularity results for the Navier–Stokes equations,Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics41(1988), no. 4, 437–458. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ cpa.3160410404

    1988

  12. [12]

    Constantin, W

    P. Constantin, W. E, and E. S. Titi, Onsager’s conjecture on the energy conservation for solutions of Euler’s equation,Communications in Mathematical Physics165(1994), 207–209. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02099744

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02099744 1994

  13. [13]

    G. L. Eyink, Energy dissipation without viscosity in ideal hydrodynamics. I. Fourier analysis and local energy transfer,Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena78(1994), no. 3–4, 222–240. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(94)90117-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0167-2789(94)90117-1 1994

  14. [14]

    Amann,Linear and Quasilinear Parabolic Problems

    H. Amann,Linear and Quasilinear Parabolic Problems. Vol. I: Abstract Linear Theory, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1995. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-9221-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-9221-6 1995

  15. [15]

    Lunardi,Analytic Semigroups and Optimal Regularity in Parabolic Problems, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1995

    A. Lunardi,Analytic Semigroups and Optimal Regularity in Parabolic Problems, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1995. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-9234-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-9234-6 1995

  16. [16]

    Kozono and H

    H. Kozono and H. Sohr, Regularity criterion of weak solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations, Advances in Differential Equations2(1997), no. 4, 535–554. DOI:https://doi.org/10. 57262/ade/1366741147

    arXiv 1997

  17. [17]

    Lin, A new proof of the Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg theorem,Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics51(1998), no

    F.-H. Lin, A new proof of the Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg theorem,Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics51(1998), no. 3, 241–257. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI)1097-0312(199803)51:3<241::AID-CPA2>3.0.CO;2-A

    1998

  18. [18]

    O. A. Ladyzhenskaya and G. A. Seregin, On partial regularity of suitable weak solutions to the three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations,Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics1 (1999), 356–387. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s000210050015

    work page doi:10.1007/s000210050015 1999

  19. [19]

    H. J. Choe and J. L. Lewis, On the singular set in the Navier–Stokes equations,Journal of Functional Analysis175(2000), no. 2, 348–369. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1006/jfan. 2000.3582

    work page doi:10.1006/jfan 2000

  20. [20]

    Duchon and R

    J. Duchon and R. Robert, Inertial energy dissipation for weak solutions of incompressible Euler and Navier–Stokes equations,Nonlinearity13(2000), no. 1, 249–255. DOI:https: //doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/13/1/312. 74

    work page doi:10.1088/0951-7715/13/1/312 2000

  21. [21]

    G. A. Seregin and V. Šverák, Navier–Stokes equations with lower bounds on the pressure, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis163(2002), no. 1, 65–86. DOI:https://doi. org/10.1007/s002050200199

    work page doi:10.1007/s002050200199 2002

  22. [22]

    Escauriaza, G

    L. Escauriaza, G. Seregin, and V. Šverák,L3,∞-solutions of Navier–Stokes equations and backward uniqueness,Russian Mathematical Surveys58(2003), no. 2, 211–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1070/RM2003v058n02ABEH000609

    work page doi:10.1070/rm2003v058n02abeh000609 2003

  23. [23]

    Kukavica and M

    I. Kukavica and M. Ziane, One component regularity for the Navier–Stokes equations, Nonlinearity19(2006), no. 2, 453–469. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/19/2/ 012

    work page doi:10.1088/0951-7715/19/2/ 2006

  24. [24]

    Kukavica and M

    I. Kukavica and M. Ziane, Navier–Stokes equations with regularity in one direction,Journal of Mathematical Physics48(2007), no. 6, 065203, 10 pp. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/ 1.2395919

    2007

  25. [25]

    G. A. Seregin, Local regularity for suitable weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations, Russian Mathematical Surveys62(2007), no. 3, 595–614. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1070/ RM2007v062n03ABEH004415

    2007

  26. [26]

    Gustafson, K

    S. Gustafson, K. Kang, and T.-P. Tsai, Interior regularity criteria for suitable weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations,Communications in Mathematical Physics273(2007), 161–176. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-007-0214-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-007-0214-6 2007

  27. [27]

    Vasseur, A new proof of partial regularity of solutions to Navier–Stokes equations,Nonlinear Differential Equations and Applications14(2007), 753–785

    A. Vasseur, A new proof of partial regularity of solutions to Navier–Stokes equations, Nonlinear Differential Equations and Applications14(2007), 753–785. DOI:https://doi. org/10.1007/s00030-007-6001-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s00030-007-6001-4 2007

  28. [28]

    Zhou and M

    Y. Zhou and M. Pokorný, On a regularity criterion for the Navier–Stokes equations involving gradient of one velocity component,Journal of Mathematical Physics50(2009), no. 12, 123514, 11 pp. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3268589

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3268589 2009

  29. [29]

    Zhou and M

    Y. Zhou and M. Pokorný, On the regularity of the solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations via one velocity component,Nonlinearity23(2010), no. 5, 1097–1107. DOI:https://doi. org/10.1088/0951-7715/23/5/004

    work page doi:10.1088/0951-7715/23/5/004 2010

  30. [30]

    Cao and E

    C. Cao and E. S. Titi, Global regularity criterion for the 3D Navier–Stokes equations involving one entry of the velocity gradient tensor,Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis202 (2011), 919–932. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-011-0439-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00205-011-0439-6 2011

  31. [31]

    C. E. Kenig and G. S. Koch, An alternative approach to regularity for the Navier–Stokes equations in critical spaces,Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré C, Analyse Non Linéaire28 (2011), no. 2, 159–187. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anihpc.2010.10.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.anihpc.2010.10.004 2011

  32. [32]

    Gallagher, G

    I. Gallagher, G. S. Koch, and F. Planchon, A profile decomposition approach to theL∞ t L3 x Navier–Stokes regularity criterion,Mathematische Annalen355(2013), 1527–1559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-012-0819-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00208-012-0819-3 2013

  33. [33]

    Jia and V

    H. Jia and V. Šverák, Local-in-space estimates near initial time for weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations and forward self-similar solutions,Inventiones Mathematicae196 (2014), 233–265. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-013-0468-x. 75

    work page doi:10.1007/s00222-013-0468-x 2014

  34. [34]

    G. A. Seregin,Lecture Notes on Regularity Theory for the Navier–Stokes Equations, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2015. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1142/ 9314

    2015

  35. [35]

    Chemin and P

    J.-Y. Chemin and P. Zhang, On the critical one component regularity for 3-D Navier–Stokes system,Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure49(2016), no. 1, 131–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24033/asens.2278

    work page doi:10.24033/asens.2278 2016

  36. [36]

    , TITLE =

    T. Tao, Finite time blowup for an averaged three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equation, Journal of the American Mathematical Society29(2016), no. 3, 601–674. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1090/jams/838

    work page doi:10.1090/jams/838 2016

  37. [37]

    Chemin, P

    J.-Y. Chemin, P. Zhang, and Z. Zhang, On the critical one component regularity for 3-D Navier–Stokes system: general case,Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis224(2017), no. 3, 871–905. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-017-1089-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s00205-017-1089-0 2017

  38. [38]

    Guevara and N

    C. Guevara and N. C. Phuc, Local energy bounds and epsilon-regularity criteria for the 3D Navier–Stokes system,Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations56(2017), no. 3, article no. 68, 16 pp. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-017-1151-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s00526-017-1151-7 2017

  39. [39]

    Kukavica, W

    I. Kukavica, W. Rusin, and M. Ziane, An anisotropic partial regularity criterion for the Navier–Stokes equations,Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics19(2017), 123–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-016-0278-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00021-016-0278-1 2017

  40. [40]

    Wolf, On the local pressure of the Navier–Stokes equations and related systems,Advances in Differential Equations22(2017), no

    J. Wolf, On the local pressure of the Navier–Stokes equations and related systems,Advances in Differential Equations22(2017), no. 5/6, 305–338. DOI:https://doi.org/10.57262/ ade/1489802453

    arXiv 2017

  41. [41]

    T. M. Leslie and R. Shvydkoy, The energy measure for the Euler and Navier–Stokes equations, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis230(2018), 459–492. DOI:https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00205-018-1250-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s00205-018-1250-4 2018

  42. [42]

    B. Han, Z. Lei, D. Li, and N. Zhao, Sharp one component regularity for Navier–Stokes, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis231(2019), 939–970. DOI:https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00205-018-1292-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s00205-018-1292-7 2019

  43. [43]

    Barker and C

    T. Barker and C. Prange, Quantitative regularity for the Navier–Stokes equations via spatial concentration,Communications in Mathematical Physics385(2021), no. 2, 717–792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-04122-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-021-04122-x 2021

  44. [44]

    Kang and D

    K. Kang and D. D. Nguyen, Local regularity criteria in terms of one velocity component for the Navier–Stokes equations,Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics25(2023), no. 1, article no. 10, 15 pp. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-022-00754-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s00021-022-00754-8 2023

  45. [45]

    Albritton, T

    D. Albritton, T. Barker, and C. Prange, Epsilon regularity for the Navier–Stokes equations via weak–strong uniqueness,Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics25(2023), no. 3, article no. 49, 12 pp. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-023-00780-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s00021-023-00780-0 2023

  46. [46]

    Finite-Scale One-Component Regularity via Harmonic Pressure for the 3D Navier-Stokes Equations

    R. Yu, Finite-scale one-component regularity via harmonic pressure for the 3D Navier–Stokes equations, arXiv:2606.08352 [math.AP], 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2606.08352. 76

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv 2026