A Promise for the JWST era: Massive black holes directly collapsed from wave dark matter haloes, and Star formation in and around their accretion flows

George Rieke; Haixia Ma; Marcia Rieke; Peter Behroozi; Runyu Meng; Xiaobo Dong; Xinyu Li; Yongda Zhu; Zhe Sun; Zhiying Mao

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 63 references

A Promise for the JWST era: Massive black holes directly collapsed from wave dark matter haloes, and Star formation in and around their accretion flows

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Massive black holes could form directly from wave dark matter haloes before galaxies exist, and star formation around their accretion flows would explain JWST's early-galaxy puzzles.

desk verdict A bold, honest synthesis that makes the case for wave-DM collapse into seed black holes, but the load-bearing mechanism is explicitly unquantified and the paper is best read as a research agenda. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.09258 v1 pith:4O5HDYKE submitted 2025-08-12 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COcond-mat.quant-gas

Xiaobo Dong , Yongda Zhu , Marcia Rieke , George Rieke , Xinyu Li , Peter Behroozi , Haixia Ma , Runyu Meng

show 2 more authors

Zhiying Mao Zhe Sun

This is my paper

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.COcond-mat.quant-gas

keywords wavedarkmatterfuzzydirectcollapseblackholesnon-axisymmetricinstabilitybosonstarsJWSThigh-redshiftgalaxiessupermassiveholeseeds

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that several independent JWST puzzles—galaxies that appear too early and too massive, black holes that are overmassive relative to their hosts, and metals in the first galaxies—are actually one phenomenon. The proposed cause is that massive black holes formed before the first galaxies by direct collapse of wave dark matter haloes: ultralight bosonic dark matter whose haloes naturally form soliton-like condensate cores with zero bulk angular momentum. The authors remove two supposed barriers to such collapse (the Kaup maximum stable mass and the 'bosenova' explosion) and identify the non-axisymmetric instability of spinning boson stars as the concrete mechanism that turns a spinning core into a black hole. Around these black holes, star formation then proceeds inside and outward through the accretion flows, which would explain the compact, dense appearance of early galaxies, the little red dots, and the high metallicities seen in quasar broad-line regions. If the paper is right, the origin of supermassive black holes, the nature of dark matter, and the JWST anomalies would be a single story.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the non-axisymmetric instability (NAI) of spinning boson stars: a rotating scalar-field star, the relativistic counterpart of a wave-CDM solitonic core, develops a growing non-axisymmetric mode and collapses to a black hole rather than dispersing. The paper couples that GR instability to two wave-CDM properties: solitonic condensate cores with curl-free bulk velocity (zero angular momentum) and the proliferation of dense 'nonclassical haloes' from wave interference, which deepens local gravitational wells. On the baryon side, the machinery is inside-to-outside star formation: accretion-modified star formation in self-gravitating accretion disks plus shock-trigge

What would settle it

A full cosmological Schrödinger–Poisson simulation of an assembling, spinning wave-CDM halo, continued into the strong-gravity regime, would settle the mechanism: if the solitonic core's non-axisymmetric instability takes longer than the halo's disruption time, or the core disperses before reaching relativistic densities, the proposed collapse channel fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that JWST's 'impossibly early' systems are not anomalies but the expected signature of wave CDM. In this model, dark matter is an ultralight bosonic field whose condensates form solitonic cores; because a condensate's bulk is curl-free, it carries zero bulk angular momentum, so the cold, zero-spin matter that direct-collapse black hole scenarios have always needed is already present in wave CDM haloes. The paper removes two supposed obstacles—the Kaup maximum stable mass and the bosenova explosion—arguing both apply to stationary equilibrium configurations, not to the turbulent, dynamically evolving cores of cosmological haloes. It then points to the non-axisymme

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the non-axisymmetric instability seen in stationary spinning boson stars also operates in the non-stationary, turbulent solitonic cores of cosmological wave CDM haloes and collapses them into black holes faster than they are disrupted; the paper flags this as a critical gap yet to be investigated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Heavy seed black holes with masses $\gtrsim 10^4\,M_\odot$ can exist before the first stars or galaxies form, so JWST should keep finding overmassive, 'naked' black holes and little red dots with little or no host galaxy.
Early galaxies can look mature and compact at $z\gtrsim7$ because their stars form inside-out around seed black holes, building bulges and massive disks faster than bottom-up CDM assembly alone allows.
The puzzling pattern of high-redshift quasar metallicities—higher in the broad-line region than in the narrow-line region—follows directly from stars being born and dying inside the accretion flow near the black hole.
The wave-CDM halo mass function is not suppressed at low masses once nonclassical haloes from wave interference are counted, so JWST abundance measurements at $z\approx3$–4 can distinguish wave CDM from particle CDM.
Star formation in compact, high-acceleration regions is more efficient and less suppressed by stellar feedback, easing the budget problem of too many baryons locked in stars at early times.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the collapse is as fast as the paper implies, wave-CDM haloes could produce a top-heavy seed black hole population at $z>10$; comparing JWST's AGN luminosity function at those redshifts with the predicted halo mass function would test this.
The scenario implies a physical link between the boson mass and seed black hole masses through the soliton–halo relation, so a measured seed-mass distribution could constrain the boson mass independently of Lyman-$\alpha$ bounds.
The same instability, if generic, would make soliton-core collapses and binary-soliton mergers gravitational-wave sources at high redshift with no electromagnetic counterpart, potentially distinguishable by future space-based detectors.
Because wave interference creates dense 'nonclassical haloes' outside the usual CDM halo definition, JWST's galaxy abundance may not map onto the CDM halo mass function in the standard way; this complicates—or enriches—the interpretation of early galaxy counts.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

What you should know first: this is a speculative but unusually honest synthesis. The new thing is not any single ingredient—wave DM solitons, the spinning-boson-star instability, and star formation in AGN disks all predate this paper. What is new is the claim that they fit together into one story: wave CDM haloes collapse directly into massive black holes before galaxies form, and the accretion flows around those black holes then drive inside-to-outside star formation, which together explain the JWST puzzles. The paper makes that case clearly and cites the relevant literature. It also does a genuine service by dismantling two "obstacles" (the Kaup mass limit and the bosenova) that have been used to dismiss wave-DM collapse. Those arguments are heuristic but plausible.

The soft spots are structural, not incidental. The load-bearing step—that the non-axisymmetric instability found in stationary, rotating boson stars operates in non-stationary, turbulent cosmological cores—is not derived, simulated, or quantified. The authors admit this directly: they call it a "critical gap" and say it needs thorough investigation. That admission is to their credit, but it means the central mechanism is a hope, not a result. There is also an internal tension the paper does not fully confront: the bulk superfluid is curl-free and carries zero angular momentum; angular momentum lives in quantized vortices. The cited instability is a bar-mode of a rotating star. How vortices couple to the bulk and drive a GR collapse is exactly the missing link. The only quantitative element, the nonclassical halo mass function in Eq. 1, is fitted to May & Springel (C=3.10, kappa=-1.43); it is a parametric description of a simulation, not an independent prediction. The choice M_halo/M_star=800 is made to match the theory, so the "observed allowed region" is not a sharp test.

None of this makes the paper worthless. For a reader working on wave DM or seed black holes, it is a useful roadmap of what would need to be true and what to compute next. It deserves serious referee attention as a perspective piece, with the caveat that the title promises more than the content delivers. The authors know exactly where the gaps are; they just haven't filled them.

My recommendation: don't desk-reject it on grounds of being speculative—it is transparent about that—but send it to referees who will push on the NAI transfer and the fitted HMF. If those pieces harden, this could be important. Today it is a well-argued hypothesis.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that a single modification to CDM—ultralight wave dark matter—can explain a broad set of JWST anomalies. It proposes that dense solitonic cores and nonclassical haloes of wave CDM collapse directly into massive black holes via the non-axisymmetric instability found in spinning boson stars, before galaxies form; subsequent star formation in and around accretion flows then produces the observed overmassive black holes, little red dots, and early chemical enrichment. It also presents a model for the wave-CDM halo mass function (Eq. 1) with an enhanced low-mass population, fitted to the Schrödinger-Poisson simulations of May & Springel (2023), and uses it to claim that the low-mass suppression usually expected for wave dark matter is absent.

Significance. If the central collapse mechanism were quantitatively established, the scenario would be genuinely significant: it would tie the origin of the first massive black holes to the microphysical nature of dark matter and offer a unified explanation for several JWST tensions. The paper is useful in collecting these tensions and in pointing to the recent boson-star instability literature as a possible path. It also makes a concrete, falsifiable contact with halo mass function measurements. These strengths are real. However, the manuscript provides no derivation or simulation of the crucial transition from Newtonian cosmological cores to the GR instability; the paper's own text flags this as a 'critical gap'. The halo mass function 'prediction' is a two-parameter fit, with the observational constraint partly chosen to match the model. Thus the paper is best read as a research proposal, not a demonstration.

major comments (3)

[Key: Non-axisymmetric instability of spinning boson stars, the formation mechanism of DCBHs] The paper's central mechanism is the transfer of the non-axisymmetric instability (NAI) found in stationary, spinning relativistic boson stars (refs. 4, 47, 48) to the non-stationary, turbulent solitonic cores of wave CDM haloes. This step is not demonstrated. The text itself concedes: 'there is indeed a critical gap yet to investigate thoroughly: how often and how soon for the aforementioned dynamic processes to drive haloes from the Newtonian to strong-field gravitational regime.' No timescale, collapse criterion, or simulation is provided. Furthermore, the authors argue that the bulk of a wave-CDM condensate is curl-free with zero angular momentum, with angular momentum confined to quantized vortices; it is not shown that such a configuration can feed the rotational bar-mode instability that powers NAI in boson stars. Because this gap is the load-bearing step from 'wave CDM haloes exi
[Prediction for halo mass functions of wave CDM, Eq. (1) and Figure 2] The claimed 'no suppression in the low-mass regime' is not an independent prediction. C=3.10 and kappa=-1.43 are best-fit parameters of Eq. (1) to the May & Springel (2023) simulation's nonclassical population; the negative kappa is the fit, not a consequence of the physics. The observational test in Figure 2 is also partly circular: the dashed dark-yellow HMF is obtained by assuming M_halo/M_* = 800 'to roughly match' the theoretical HMFs, so the 'observationally allowed region' is not an external constraint on the model. The paper should provide fit residuals and uncertainties, and present a forward model of the stellar mass function from the HMF rather than an inverse mapping with an adjustable ratio.
[Solutions to the false obstacles for wave CDM collapsing to BHs] Misconception 1 is handled by a plausibility example ('imagine such a case') and deferred to 'advanced mathematical frameworks ... beyond the scope of this article.' Misconception 2 is an analogy to cold-atom BEC collapse; while three-body recombination is absent for ultralight bosons, the manuscript does not rule out other nonlinear mechanisms in the gravitational Schrödinger-Poisson system (e.g., gravitational cooling, vortex expulsion) that could prevent coherent collapse. These arguments may be correct, but as written they are heuristic and do not remove the obstacles with the certainty the text claims. The conclusion that wave CDM haloes can collapse is therefore not established.

minor comments (5)

[Figures 3 and 4] Figures 3 and 4 are labeled 'Option 2'/'Option 3' and 'optional' with hand-drawn notes; they appear to be internal artifacts and should be deleted before any submission.
[JWST puzzles section] The statement 'the non-detection by JWST of first stars and first galaxies' is given without a reference and needs support. Also, 'active galactic nulei' should be 'nuclei'.
[Eq. (2) and Figure 2] M_0 is defined via m22 = m/(1e-22 eV), but the figure caption uses a boson mass mc^2 = 7e-23 eV; clarify the conversion and how M_0 is computed in the fit.
[Prediction for halo mass functions] The ratio M_halo/M_* = 0.2589/(0.07*0.0486) = 76 is called the 'absolute lower-limit HMF'; the paper should justify why this cosmic average is a hard lower limit rather than a central value.
[Inside-to-Outside star formation] The claim that this scenario is 'the only theory so far capable of explaining' the BLR-NLR metallicity difference is unsupported; no systematic comparison with alternative enrichment mechanisms is given.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The halo-mass-function 'validation' uses an M_halo/M*=800 upper limit chosen to match the theory, and the low-mass 'no suppression' claim restates the fitted power law; the central DCBH mechanism is an admitted extrapolation rather than a circular step.

fitted input called prediction [Prediction for halo mass functions of wave CDM, text after Eqns. (1)-(2) and Figure 2]
"By applying this model (Eqns. 1 and 2) to the Schrodinger–Poisson simulation result with particle CDM IC of ref.39 (as displayed in their Figure 9), we find that the proposed power-function term (in Eqn. 1) works fairly well, yielding best-fit C=3.10 and κ=−1.43. ... contrary to prior expectations for wave CDM, these galaxy-forming nonclassical haloes and subhaloes exhibit no suppression in the low-mass regime of the mass function."

The 'no suppression in the low-mass regime' is not an independent prediction. It is a direct restatement of the fitted power-function ansatz with negative exponent κ=−1.43: Equation (1) multiplies the classical MF by C(M/M0)^κ, so a negative κ automatically enhances the nonclassical MF toward low masses. The model was not derived from first principles; the parameters were fit to the May & Springel simulation that already showed a proliferation of low-mass objects. Presenting the fitted curve as a theoretical prediction, and then using it as evidence for the wave-CDM scenario, is fitting the input and calling the output a prediction.
self definitional [Prediction for halo mass functions of wave CDM, paragraph immediately following Figure 2]
"The other one (the dark yellow, dashed line) is obtained by simply assuming M_halo/M*=800, in order to roughly match the theoretical HMFs (no matter neither the particle CDM one or that of all wave CDM haloes), and could be regarded as a reasonable upper-limit HMF constrained by the observations. Thus, any correct theoretical HMFs should be consistent with the observationally allowed region between the two dark yellow lines."

The 'observationally allowed region' is not an independent constraint: its upper boundary is defined by choosing M_halo/M*=800 specifically so that it roughly matches the theoretical HMFs being tested. The subsequent assertion that the theoretical HMFs lie inside the allowed region is therefore true by construction for the upper boundary. The lower boundary (M_halo/M*=76) is an externally set baryon-budget limit, but the claimed consistency with observations relies on the manufactured upper limit, making the validation circular.

full rationale

The paper's central hypothesis—wave-CDM soliton cores collapse directly to massive BHs via the non-axisymmetric instability of spinning boson stars—is not circular in the narrow sense: it imports an external numerical result (refs. 4, 47, 48) and explicitly concedes that the transfer to cosmological haloes is unquantified: 'there is indeed a critical gap yet to investigate thoroughly: how often and how soon for the aforementioned dynamic processes to drive haloes from the Newtonian to strong-field gravitational regime.' That is a derivation/completeness gap, not a self-referential reduction, so it does not by itself raise the circularity score. The circularity lies in the quantitative halo-mass-function test. Equation (1) is posited as a power-function ansatz and fitted to the May & Springel simulation (C=3.10, κ=−1.43); the subsequent claim that nonclassical haloes show 'no suppression in the low-mass regime' is simply the fitted negative power law restated as a finding. More seriously, the 'observationally allowed region' used to validate the theoretical HMFs is constructed by assuming M_halo/M*=800 'in order to roughly match the theoretical HMFs'; the theory is then declared consistent with this region. The upper boundary of the region is defined by the theory, so the agreement is by construction. The lower boundary (M_halo/M*=76) is an independent baryon-budget limit, but the figure's claimed consistency relies on the manufactured upper limit. The only self-citation, 'R.Meng, X.Dong, et al., in prep.', is not load-bearing. Overall, the central scenario is an extrapolation with an admitted missing quantitative step, while the one quantitative 'prediction' checked against observations has a circularly chosen comparison band: partial circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new fundamental particles or forces. Its principal theoretical baggage is the transfer of boson-star instability results to cosmological wave CDM haloes, which the authors themselves flag as unquantified, plus the fitted parameters and chosen mass ratio used to construct the halo mass function comparison.

free parameters (4)

C (nonclassical halo MF amplitude) = 3.10
Fitted to the May and Springel (2023) wave CDM simulation with particle CDM initial conditions (their Figure 9); enters Eq. 1 and controls the predicted abundance of nonclassical low-mass haloes.
kappa (nonclassical halo MF slope) = -1.43
Fitted alongside C to the same simulation; the negative slope produces the claimed excess of low-mass haloes and the apparent match to the observed stellar mass function.
M_halo/M_star upper-limit ratio = 800
Chosen in order to roughly match the theoretical halo mass functions when converting the observed galaxy stellar mass function to a halo mass function; this choice manufactures part of the apparent agreement.
Boson mass used in Figure 2 = m c^2 = 7 x 10^-23 eV
The paper states it does not prescribe the boson mass, but Figure 2 adopts this value, which sets the characteristic mass M0 in Eq. 2 and therefore affects the plotted mass functions.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Wave CDM is an ultralight bosonic field with negligible self-interaction and negligible coupling to baryons, described by the Schrodinger-Poisson system.
Invoked in the wave CDM section to set the baseline model; the paper explicitly excludes hybrid and self-interacting variants.
domain assumption The condensate bulk of a wave CDM halo is curl-free and carries zero bulk angular momentum, with angular momentum confined to quantized vortices.
Invoked in Ready cold matter with zero angular momentum to satisfy the low-spin requirement for direct collapse; this is a standard BEC property but is load-bearing for the scenario.
domain assumption Dark matter bosons in haloes are at T much less than T_c, so a substantial condensate fraction exists.
Assumed throughout the wave CDM discussion to justify treating halo cores as condensed coherent objects.
ad hoc to paper Newtonian solitonic cores of wave CDM haloes are physically the same objects as the Newtonian limit of boson stars, so general-relativistic instability results for boson stars transfer to halo cores.
This is the key assumption connecting NAI simulations to cosmological DCBHs; the paper explicitly labels the quantitative transfer as a critical gap yet to investigate.
ad hoc to paper The transient high-density interference granules and filament knots in wave CDM simulations act as persistent gravitational wells able to accumulate baryons and host star formation.
Invoked in Prediction for halo mass functions, where these objects are relabeled nonclassical haloes; their coherence times and ability to bind baryons are not established.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Promise for the JWST era: Massive black holes directly collapsed from wave dark matter haloes, and Star formation in and around their accretion flows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4O5HDYKE

@misc{pith2026250809258,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Promise for the JWST era: Massive black holes directly collapsed from wave dark matter haloes, and Star formation in and around their accretion flows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4O5HDYKE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.09258}
}

read the original abstract

There are several puzzling phenomena from recent JWST observations, which seem to push the standard {\Lambda}CDM cosmology over the edge. All those puzzles can be understood in a coherent way if we assume that first massive black holes (MBHs, the "heavy eggs") formed by directly collapsing from wave CDM haloes, which can be even earlier than the formation of first galaxies (the "chickens"). We elucidate two false obstacles that have been believed to prevent wave CDM haloes from collapsing into black holes (namely "maximum stable mass" and "bosenova") and point out that general-relativistic instabilities (e.g., the non-axisymmetric instability numerically found in spinning scalar-field boson stars) could serve as the concrete mechanisms for direct-collapse black holes (DCBHs) born from wave dark matter. Once the MBHs formed, star formation bursts in and around the accretion flows, characteristic of a special mode in compact regions of high gravitational accelerations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

[1]

Impossibly early formation problem

“Impossibly early formation problem.” The biggest puzzle is undoubtedly the “impossibly early for- mation problem,” as highlighted in many research papers en- titled like this or similar (accelerated early galaxy formation, enhanced matter power spectrum on galactic scales, etc.), dis- covering more abundant luminous galaxies atz >7than con- ventionalΛCDM...

arXiv 2025
[2]

Over-massive black holes, and the possible presence of naked quasars before the birth of first stars and first galaxies. JWST observations have revealed a number of high-redshift AGNs with black hole masses that appear 10–100 times larger than expected from the stellar mass (M �) of their host galaxies in terms of the localM BH–M� scaling relation.12 Some...

work page
[3]

small-scale crises

Unexpected rapid chemical enrichment in galaxies and quasars atz >7. The studies prior to JWST indicated that the rest-UV continuum slopes of early star-forming galaxies are typically blue, con- sistent with young, dust-poor systems. However, after launch JWST has soon revealed a population of dusty, optically faint sources that were previously undetected...

work page 1999
[4]

Collapse of a self-gravitating Bose-Einstein con- densate with attractive self-interaction.Phys

Chavanis, P .-H. Collapse of a self-gravitating Bose-Einstein con- densate with attractive self-interaction.Phys. Rev. D94, 083007 (2016).��

work page 2016
[5]

Helfer, T.�� Black hole formation from axion stars.�� 2017, 055 (2017).��

work page 2017
[6]

& Zhao, Y

Sikivie, P . & Zhao, Y . Supermassive black hole formation in the initial collapse of axion dark matter.�� arXiv:2407.11169 (2024).��

arXiv 2024
[7]

Sanchis-Gual, N.�� Nonlinear Dynamics of Spinning Bosonic Stars: Formation and Stability.Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 221101 (2019).��

work page 2019
[8]

& Zahn, J.-P

Collin, S. & Zahn, J.-P . Star formation and evolution in accretion disks around massive black holes.Astron. Astrophys.344, 433– 449 (1999)

work page 1999

Show all 63 references

[9]

& Rees, M

Silk, J. & Rees, M. J. Quasars and galaxy formation.Astron. As- trophys.331, L1–L4 (1998).��

1998
[10]

C., Norman, C., Nusser, A

Silk, J., Begelman, M. C., Norman, C., Nusser, A. & Wyse, R. F . G. Which Came First: Supermassive Black Holes or Galaxies? Insights from JWST.Astrophys. J.961, L39 (2024).��

2024
[11]

Accelerated by Dark Matter: a High-redshift Pathway to Efficient Galaxy-scale Star Formation.�� arXiv:2407.10900 (2024).��

Boylan-Kolchin, M. Accelerated by Dark Matter: a High-redshift Pathway to Efficient Galaxy-scale Star Formation.�� arXiv:2407.10900 (2024).��

2024 arXiv
[12]

Eisenstein, D. J. & Loeb, A. Origin of Quasar Progenitors from the Collapse of Low-Spin Cosmological Perturbations.Astrophys. J. 443, 11 (1995).��

1995
[13]

& Lin, D

Ali-Dib, M. & Lin, D. N. C. The impermanent fate of massive stars in AGN discs.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.526, 5824–5838 (2023). ��

2023
[14]

Wang, J.-M.�� Star Formation in Self-gravitating Disks in Active Galactic Nuclei. III. Efficient Production of Iron and In- frared Spectral Energy Distributions.Astrophys. J.954, 84 (2023). ��

2023
[15]

Adamo, A.�� The First Billion Y ears, According to JWST.�� arXiv:2405.21054 (2024).��

2024 arXiv
[16]

Stress testing�CDM with high-redshift galaxy candidates.�� 7, 731–735 (2023).��

Boylan-Kolchin, M. Stress testing�CDM with high-redshift galaxy candidates.�� 7, 731–735 (2023).��

2023
[17]

Woodrum, C.�� Using JADES NIRCam photometry to investi- gate the dependence of stellar mass inferences on the IMF in the early universe.�� 121, e2317375121 (2024)

2024
[18]

Whitler, L.�� The��galaxy UV luminosity func- tion from the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey: in- sights into early galaxy evolution and reionization.�� arXiv:2501.00984 (2025).��

2025
[19]

E.�� Dissecting the massive pristine, neutral gas reservoir of a remarkably bright galaxy at z = 14.179.�� arXiv:2502.06016 (2025).��

Heintz, K. E.�� Dissecting the massive pristine, neutral gas reservoir of a remarkably bright galaxy at z = 14.179.�� arXiv:2502.06016 (2025).��

2025 arXiv
[20]

Fudamoto, Y .�� SAPPHIRES: A Galaxy Over-Density in the Heart of Cosmic Reionization at�� .�� arXiv:2503.15597 (2025).��

2025 arXiv
[21]

& Fan, X

Pacucci, F ., Nguyen, B., Carniani, S., Maiolino, R. & Fan, X. JWST CEERS and JADES Active Galaxies at z = 4-7 Violate the Local M –M � Relation at�3�: Implications for Low-mass Black Holes and Seeding Models.Astrophys. J.957, L3 (2023). ��

2023
[22]

Nelson, E.�� Ionized Gas Kinematics with FRESCO: An Ex- tended, Massive, Rapidly Rotating Galaxy at z = 5.4.Astrophys. J. 976, L27 (2024).��

2024
[23]

M.�� A core in a star-forming disc as evidence of inside-out growth in the early Universe.�� (2024).��

Baker, W. M.�� A core in a star-forming disc as evidence of inside-out growth in the early Universe.�� (2024).��

2024
[24]

Bogd ´an, ´A.�� Evidence for heavy-seed origin of early super- massive black holes from a z�10 X-ray quasar.�� 8, 126–133 (2024).��

2024
[25]

C., Li, R

Chen, C.-H., Ho, L. C., Li, R. & Zhuang, M.-Y . The Host Galaxy (If Any) of the Little Red Dots (2024).��

2024
[26]

Ding, X.�� Detection of stellar light from quasar host galaxies at redshifts above 6.Nature621, 51–55 (2023).��

2023
[27]

J.959, 39 (2023).��

Harikane, Y .�� A JWST/NIRSpec First Census of Broad-line AGNs at z = 4–7: Detection of 10 Faint AGNs with M BH �10 6– 108 M⊙ and Their Host Galaxy Properties.Astrophys. J.959, 39 (2023).��

2023
[28]

G.�� CEERS Key Paper

P ´erez-Gonz´alez, P . G.�� CEERS Key Paper. IV. A Triality in the Nature of HST -dark Galaxies.�� 946, L16 (2023)

2023
[29]

Carniani, S.�� Spectroscopic confirmation of two luminous galaxies at a redshift of 14.��633, 318–322 (2024)

2024
[30]

Robertson, B.�� Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic Star Formation Rate Density 300 Myr after the Big Bang.�� 970, 31 (2024)

2024
[31]

Schouws, S.�� Detection of [OIII]88�m in JADES-GS-z14-0 at�� (2024).��

2024
[32]

& Ferland, G

Hamann, F . & Ferland, G. Elemental Abundances in Quasistellar Objects: Star Formation and Galactic Nuclear Evolution at High Redshifts.ARA&A37, 487–531 (1999).��

1999
[33]

Bosman, S. E. I.�� A mature quasar at cosmic dawn revealed by JWST rest-frame infrared spectroscopy.�� 8, 1054–1065 (2024)

2024
[34]

Huang, J., Lin, D. N. C. & Shields, G. Metal enrichment due to embedded stars in AGN discs.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.525, 5702–5718 (2023).��

2023
[35]

& Gruzinov, A.Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Particles.Phys

Hu, W., Barkana, R. & Gruzinov, A.Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Particles.Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 1158–1161 (2000).��

2000
[36]

Niemeyer, J. C. Small-scale structure of fuzzy and axion-like dark matter.�� 113, 103787 (2020).��

2020
[37]

Ferreira, E. G. M. Ultra-light dark matter.A&A Rev.29, 7 (2021). ��

2021
[38]

Wave Dark Matter.ARA&A59, 247–289 (2021).��

Hui, L. Wave Dark Matter.ARA&A59, 247–289 (2021).��

2021
[39]

& Kamali, V

Jiao, H., Brandenberger, R. & Kamali, V. Direct Collapse Super- massive Black Holes from Ultralight Dark Matter.�� arXiv:2503.19414 (2025).��

2025 arXiv
[40]

Pollack, J., Spergel, D. N. & Steinhardt, P . J. Supermassive Black Holes from Ultra-strongly Self-interacting Dark Matter.As- trophys. J.804, 131 (2015).��

2015
[41]

Jiang, F .�� Formation of the Little Red Dots from the Core- collapse of Self-interacting Dark Matter Halos.�� arXiv:2503.23710 (2025).��

2025
[42]

& Springel, V

May, S. & Springel, V. The halo mass function and filaments in full cosmological simulations with fuzzy dark matter.Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc.524, 4256–4274 (2023).��. 9

2023
[43]

Widmark, A., Y avetz, T. D. & Li, X. Fuzzy dark matter dynamics in tidally perturbed dwarf spheroidal galaxy satellites.�� 2024, 052 (2024).��

2024
[44]

Chan, H. Y . J.�� Cosmological zoom-in simulation of fuzzy dark matter down to z = 0: tidal evolution of subhaloes in a Milky Way-sized halo.�� arXiv:2504.10387 (2025).��

2025 arXiv
[45]

Maiolino, R.�� A small and vigorous black hole in the early Universe.Nature627, 59–63 (2024).��

2024
[46]

& Haiman, Z

Inayoshi, K., Visbal, E. & Haiman, Z. The Assembly of the First Massive Black Holes.ARA&A58, 27–97 (2020).��

2020
[47]

& Klessen, R

Zwick, L., Mayer, L., Haemmerl ´e, L. & Klessen, R. S. Direct collapse of exceptionally heavy black holes in the merger-driven scenario.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.518, 2076–2087 (2023).��
[48]

R., Zwick, L

Mayer, L., Capelo, P . R., Zwick, L. & Di Matteo, T. Direct For- mation of Massive Black Holes via Dynamical Collapse in Metal- enriched Merging Galaxies at z 10: Fully Cosmological Simula- tions.Astrophys. J.961, 76 (2024).��

2024
[49]

Little Red Dots from Low-spin Galaxies at High Red- shifts.�� 8, 182 (2024).��

Loeb, A. Little Red Dots from Low-spin Galaxies at High Red- shifts.�� 8, 182 (2024).��

2024
[50]

& East, W

Siemonsen, N. & East, W. E. Stability of rotating scalar boson stars with nonlinear interactions.Phys. Rev. D103, 044022 (2021). ��

2021
[51]

& East, W

Siemonsen, N. & East, W. E. Binary boson stars: Merger dy- namics and formation of rotating remnant stars.Phys. Rev. D107, 124018 (2023).��

2023
[52]

825 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2011)

Nazarenko, S.�� , vol. 825 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2011)

2011
[53]

Kaup, D. J. Klein-Gordon Geon.�� 172, 1331– 1342 (1968)

1968
[54]

Schive, H.-Y .�� Understanding the Core-Halo Relation of Quantum Wave Dark Matter from 3D Simulations.Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 261302 (2014).��

2014
[55]

D., Li, X

Y avetz, T. D., Li, X. & Hui, L. Construction of wave dark matter ha- los: Numerical algorithm and analytical constraints.Phys. Rev. D 105, 023512 (2022).��

2022
[56]

& Nazarenko, S

Skipp, J., L ’vov, V. & Nazarenko, S. Wave turbulence in self- gravitating Bose gases and nonlocal nonlinear optics.Phys. Rev. A 102, 043318 (2020).��

2020
[57]

A.�� Dynamics of collapsing and exploding Bose- Einstein condensates.Nature412, 295–299 (2001).��

Donley, E. A.�� Dynamics of collapsing and exploding Bose- Einstein condensates.Nature412, 295–299 (2001).��

2001
[58]

G.�� The Growth of Massive Galaxies Since z = 2.Astrophys

van Dokkum, P . G.�� The Growth of Massive Galaxies Since z = 2.Astrophys. J.709, 1018–1041 (2010).��

2010
[59]

& Huang, K.-W

Schive, H.-Y ., Chiueh, T., Broadhurst, T. & Huang, K.-W. Con- trasting Galaxy Formation from Quantum Wave Dark Matter, �DM, with�CDM, using Planck and Hubble Data.Astrophys. J. 818, 89 (2016).��

2016
[60]

Astrophys

Navarro-Carrera, R.�� Constraints on the Faint End of the Galaxy Stellar Mass Function at z�4–8 from Deep JWST Data. Astrophys. J.961, 207 (2024).��

2024
[61]

Griffin, A.�� (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993)

1993
[62]

Cosmic fila- ments and first galaxies.Mon

Mocz, P .�� Galaxy formation with BECDM - II. Cosmic fila- ments and first galaxies.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.494, 2027–2044 (2020).��

2027
[63]

micro- scopic

Chiu, H. H. S., Schive, H.-Y ., Y ang, H.-Y . K., Huang, H. & Gaspari, M. Boosting Supermassive Black Hole Growth in the Early Uni- verse by Fuzzy Dark Matter Solitons.Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 051402 (2025).��. AcknowledgementsWe particularly thank Shude Mao for his warm e...

2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Impossibly early formation problem

“Impossibly early formation problem.” The biggest puzzle is undoubtedly the “impossibly early for- mation problem,” as highlighted in many research papers en- titled like this or similar (accelerated early galaxy formation, enhanced matter power spectrum on galactic scales, etc.), dis- covering more abundant luminous galaxies atz >7than con- ventionalΛCDM...

arXiv 2025

[2] [2]

Over-massive black holes, and the possible presence of naked quasars before the birth of first stars and first galaxies. JWST observations have revealed a number of high-redshift AGNs with black hole masses that appear 10–100 times larger than expected from the stellar mass (M �) of their host galaxies in terms of the localM BH–M� scaling relation.12 Some...

work page

[3] [3]

small-scale crises

Unexpected rapid chemical enrichment in galaxies and quasars atz >7. The studies prior to JWST indicated that the rest-UV continuum slopes of early star-forming galaxies are typically blue, con- sistent with young, dust-poor systems. However, after launch JWST has soon revealed a population of dusty, optically faint sources that were previously undetected...

work page 1999

[4] [4]

Collapse of a self-gravitating Bose-Einstein con- densate with attractive self-interaction.Phys

Chavanis, P .-H. Collapse of a self-gravitating Bose-Einstein con- densate with attractive self-interaction.Phys. Rev. D94, 083007 (2016).��

work page 2016

[5] [5]

Helfer, T.�� Black hole formation from axion stars.�� 2017, 055 (2017).��

work page 2017

[6] [6]

& Zhao, Y

Sikivie, P . & Zhao, Y . Supermassive black hole formation in the initial collapse of axion dark matter.�� arXiv:2407.11169 (2024).��

arXiv 2024

[7] [7]

Sanchis-Gual, N.�� Nonlinear Dynamics of Spinning Bosonic Stars: Formation and Stability.Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 221101 (2019).��

work page 2019

[8] [8]

& Zahn, J.-P

Collin, S. & Zahn, J.-P . Star formation and evolution in accretion disks around massive black holes.Astron. Astrophys.344, 433– 449 (1999)

work page 1999