REVIEW 4 cited by
Weighted refined decoupling estimates and application to Falconer distance set problem
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We prove some weighted refined decoupling estimates. As an application, we give an alternative proof of the following result on Falconer's distance set problem by the authors in a companion work: if a compact set $E\subset \mathbb{R}^d$ has Hausdorff dimension larger than $\frac{d}{2}+\frac{1}{4}-\frac{1}{8d+4}$, where $d\geq 4$, then there is a point $x\in E$ such that the pinned distance set $\Delta_x(E)$ has positive Lebesgue measure. Aside from this application, the weighted refined decoupling estimates may be of independent interest.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Lebesgue measure of distance sets with regular pins and multi-scale Mizohata-Takeuchi-type estimates
Under dim_H E >1, dim_H E + dim_H F >2 and F regular (equal Hausdorff and packing dimensions), there exists y in F such that the pinned distance set Δ_y(E) has positive Lebesgue measure.
-
Mizohata-Takeuchi inequalities for orthonormal systems
Orthonormal systems of inputs satisfy a global Mizohata-Takeuchi-type weighted inequality for the sphere and paraboloid, with an X-ray transform norm over the midpoint set K^diamond on the right-hand side.
-
From weighted paraboloid restriction to $k$-stars and distance graphs
Pinned k-star distance sets of E have positive k-measure once dim(E) exceeds (n^{2}+nk+k)/(2n+1), via a weighted paraboloid Fourier-extension identity.
-
Additive structures imply more distances in $\mathbb{F}_q^d$
For (4,s)-Salem sets in F_q^d, the threshold for determining a positive proportion of all distances is improved to q^{min{(d+2)/(4s+1),(d+4)/(8s)}}.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.