Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Complexity of Learning Temporal Properties

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.04486 v1 pith:4TWK6LQJ submitted 2024-08-08 cs.LO

classification cs.LO
keywords learningtemporalcomplexityformulaslogicamountbinarylogics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the problem of learning temporal logic formulas from examples of system behavior. Learning temporal properties has crystallized as an effective mean to explain complex temporal behaviors. Several efficient algorithms have been designed for learning temporal formulas. However, the theoretical understanding of the complexity of the learning decision problems remains largely unexplored. To address this, we study the complexity of the passive learning problems of three prominent temporal logics, Linear Temporal Logic (LTL), Computation Tree Logic (CTL) and Alternating-time Temporal Logic (ATL) and several of their fragments. We show that learning formulas using an unbounded amount of occurrences of binary operators is NP-complete for all of these logics. On the other hand, when investigating the complexity of learning formulas with bounded amount of occurrences of binary operators, we exhibit discrepancies between the complexity of learning LTL, CTL and ATL formulas (with a varying number of agents).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning Linear Temporal Specifications from Demonstrations with Uncertainty

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Minimal LTL formulas can be learned from uncertain traces by Hamming-ball groups plus a Pseudo-Boolean optimization that forces at least one consistent estimate per group.

  2. What is Formal Verification without Specifications? A Survey on mining LTL Specifications

    cs.FL 2025-01 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    This is a structured survey and qualitative comparison of recent algorithms for learning LTL specifications from positive and negative behavioral examples.

Pith tools