Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 59 references

Classification of horospherical invariant measures in higher rank: The Full Story

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In higher-rank symmetric spaces, every ergodic horospherical invariant measure is a Burger–Roblin measure, up to constant and closed orbit exceptions.

desk verdict A serious, detailed classification paper that looks correct within its stated hypertransverse class; the 'full story' heading is a bit stronger than the hypothesis allows. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.22668 v2 pith:4TWSUWK7 submitted 2026-01-30 math.DS math.GRmath.GT

Inhyeok Choi , Dongryul M. Kim This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DSmath.GRmath.GT MSC 37D4022E4037A1720F67
keywords horosphericalinvariantmeasuresAnosovsubgroupsBurger–RoblinPatterson–Sullivanhigher-rankhomogeneousspacesguidedlimitsetstransverserelatively
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper classifies all ergodic measures invariant under horospherical actions for the full class of Anosov and relatively Anosov homogeneous spaces in arbitrary higher rank. The result: up to constant multiples, the only ergodic invariant Radon measures are the Burg–Roblin measures built from divergence-type Patterson–Sullivan measures, plus in the relatively Anosov case closed horosphere orbits. This resolves open problems of Landesberg–Lee–Lindenstrauss–Oh and Oh, and it extends the rank-one theorems of Burger and Roblin to all semisimple real algebraic groups. The proof is geometric, based on coarse hyperbolic geometry and a new 'guided limit set' construction, avoiding continuous flows and ergodic theorems.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the 'guided limit set' Λ_{φ,K}(Γ) on the Gromov hyperbolic model space Z: points on the limit set that are aligned, in a precise shadow sense, along translates of an axis of a loxodromic φ. The proof shows any invariant ergodic Radon measure is supported on Λ_{φ,C}(Γ) × a_θ (Theorem 6.3), then deduces quasi-invariance under translations by Jordan projections (Theorem 6.4), which by a standard rigidity argument forces the measure to be a Burger–Roblin measure.

What would settle it

Find a Zariski dense transverse subgroup that is P_θ-transverse but not hypertransverse, and construct a Γ-invariant ergodic Radon measure on R_{Γ,θ} that is not a Burger–Roblin measure; Theorem 6.1 would then fail, showing the hypertransverse hypothesis is necessary. Conversely, if every transverse subgroup is hypertransverse, the classification would be complete for the full transverse class.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for a Zariski dense P_θ-hypertransverse subgroup Γ of a semisimple real algebraic group G, the set of Γ-invariant ergodic Radon measures on the recurrence locus R_{Γ,θ} coincides, up to constant multiples, with the set of Burger–Roblin measures associated to divergence-type Patterson–Sullivan measures of Γ on F_θ. In the Borel Anosov case (θ = Δ, the maximal parabolic), this says every NM-invariant ergodic Radon measure on the minimal set E_Γ is a constant multiple of a Burger–Roblin measure; if the P∘-action on E_Γ is minimal, the same holds for N-invariant measures. This proves the classification conjectured by Landesberg–Lee–Lindenstrauss–Oh and by Oh.

Load-bearing premise

The entire argument requires the existence of a Gromov hyperbolic model space Z on which Γ acts properly discontinuously with a Γ-equivariant homeomorphism from its limit set to the θ-limit set; if such a model does not exist for some transverse subgroup, the guided-limit-set concentration theorem and the cocycle estimates do not apply.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The classification answers Problems 1.2 and 1.3: for rank ≤ 3, every N-invariant ergodic measure on E_Γ is supported on a directional recurrent set; for all ranks, every N-invariant ergodic measure on E_Γ (when E_Γ is P∘-minimal) is Burger–Roblin.
  • For relatively Borel Anosov subgroups, the classification adds a closed-orbit exception, paralleling the rank-one geometrically finite result.
  • The sets of NM- and N-invariant ergodic measures are homeomorphic to R^{rank G}, via the parameterization by the interior of the limit cone.
  • A strengthened Hopf–Tsuji–Sullivan dichotomy holds: divergence-type Patterson–Sullivan measures are supported on guided limit sets, not just conical limit sets.
  • The method extends to normal subgroups of hypertransverse subgroups, as the classification relies only on the geometric guided-limit-set structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the hypertransverse assumption is not satisfied, the classification could fail for genuinely transverse (but not hypertransverse) subgroups; Remark 5.10 leaves this as an explicit open question—so the 'full story' may still be incomplete for the full transverse class.
  • The proof bypasses continuous flows and ergodic theorems, suggesting the same classification may extend to actions of other subgroups (e.g., unipotent flows generated by multiple root groups) via analogous guided-limit-set arguments.
  • The guided-limit-set concentration result could be used to prove new rigidity statements for conformal measures of affine and non-conformal dynamical systems, since it only needs a coarse hyperbolic model and a converging boundary map.
  • The closed-orbit alternative in the relatively Anosov case may be the only obstruction to unique ergodicity on E_{Γ,θ}; a testable question is whether the closed orbits correspond exactly to parabolic limit points and whether their measures are the only additional ergodic components.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper classifies Γ-invariant ergodic Radon measures on the θ-horospherical foliation H_θ for a class of discrete subgroups Γ of a connected semisimple real algebraic group G, called P_θ-hypertransverse subgroups. The main theorem (Theorem 6.1, stated in the introduction as Theorem 1.13) asserts that on the recurrence locus R_{Γ,θ}, every Γ-invariant ergodic Radon measure is a constant multiple of a Burger–Roblin measure associated with a divergence-type Patterson–Sullivan measure. For Borel Anosov subgroups this resolves the open problems of Landesberg–Lee–Lindenstrauss–Oh (Problem 1.2) and Oh (Problem 1.3); for relatively Anosov subgroups it gives the expected statement with the additional possibility of a closed orbit supported on the parabolic part (Corollary 1.14). The proof is geometric: it introduces guided limit sets in a Gromov hyperbolic model space, proves concentration of invariant measures on guided limit sets (Theorem 6.3), establishes quasi-invariance under translations by Jordan projections of loxodromic elements (Theorem 6.4), and then invokes the standard Aaronson–Nakada–Sarig–Solomyak/Sarig rigidity lemma together with the non-arithmeticity of the Jordan spectrum.

Significance. If the result stands, it is a major advance in the classification of horospherical invariant measures in higher rank, extending the rank-one theorems of Burger and Roblin to a broad class of infinite-volume homogeneous spaces and removing the rank restrictions and directional-set restrictions present in earlier work. The paper's method is notably original: it avoids continuous flows and Besicovitch-type covering arguments, and instead uses coarse contracting properties in a Gromov hyperbolic model with Tits-representation estimates for Iwasawa cocycles. The central theorem is proved in detail, and the paper contains a strengthened Hopf–Tsuji–Sullivan statement (Corollary 6.5) as a byproduct. The main limitation is the P_θ-hypertransverse hypothesis, which is explicitly acknowledged in Remark 5.10; the stated theorems are conditional on this hypothesis, so the scope condition does not affect the validity of the claims as stated. The paper is careful to distinguish the classification direction from the reverse inclusion, which is supplied by prior ergodicity results, and I see no circularity.

minor comments (5)
  1. [§1.4.3] Typo: 'P_θ-hypertranseverse' should be 'P_θ-hypertransverse'.
  2. [§6.2, first paragraph] The axis of φ is written as γ:R→X, but the model space is Z, not X; this is a minor notational slip.
  3. [§6.4] The proof of Theorem 6.4 invokes a 'standard ergodicity argument' and refers to [CK25b] for the reduction to compact boxes and the sufficiency of the inequality (T_φ^* μ)(E) ≥ μ(E). Since this step is load-bearing, a one-sentence explanation of the argument would improve self-containedness.
  4. [§1.4.4 / Remark 5.10] The title 'The Full Story' is somewhat stronger than the stated scope, since it is not known whether every transverse subgroup is hypertransverse. The theorems themselves are correctly conditioned on hypertransversality, but the title/abstract may overpromise relative to the full transverse class.
  5. [§4.4] The phrase 'the Burger–Roblin measure of Γ associated to ν' is used for both the measure on H_θ and the induced measure on Γ\G when θ=Δ; this is standard but could be flagged explicitly to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central quasi-invariance proof is self-contained; self-citations supply ergodicity but do not assume the classification.

full rationale

I traced the derivation from Theorem 6.1 through Theorem 6.4 and the deductions in Section 6.5. The main classification direction (Γ-invariant ergodic Radon measure ⇒ Burger–Roblin) is established by first concentrating the measure on guided limit sets (Theorem 6.3) via a geometric argument using Gromov hyperbolicity, shadows, and Tits representations; no Burger–Roblin form is assumed. Theorem 6.4 then proves quasi-invariance under translations by Jordan projections, and the non-arithmeticity of Spec_θ(Γ) (Benoist, external) makes the quasi-invariant translations dense. The rigidity lemma of [ANSS02]/[Sar04] then forces the measure to be c·e^{δψ(u)} dν(u) du with ν a δ-dimensional ψ-Patterson–Sullivan measure, and Theorem 5.9 (external plus [KOW25b]) identifies δ and divergence type. This is a standard reduction, not a renaming or a fitted parameter called a prediction. The reverse inclusion uses [Kim24] for Γ-ergodicity of Burger–Roblin measures; this is a self-citation, but it is a stated ergodicity theorem with explicit hypotheses, not the classification result, so it is independent support rather than circularity. No uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to forbid alternatives, and the guided-limit-set construction is defined and proved in the paper rather than smuggled in by citation. The only explicit limitation is Remark 5.10, which concedes it is unknown whether every transverse subgroup is hypertransverse; this restricts the scope of the 'full story' but does not affect the internal validity of the conditional theorems. Overall, the central claim has independent mathematical content and no step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the classification is parameter-free. The central axioms are imported theorems from the literature, several from the authors' own prior work. The only invented mathematical object is the guided limit set, which is a definitional tool rather than a physical postulate.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Non-arithmeticity of the Jordan spectrum for Zariski dense subsemigroups (Benoist, Theorem 4.1).
    Used at the end of §6.3 to pass from quasi-invariance under Spec_θ(Γ) to quasi-invariance under a dense subgroup of translations, which is essential for the Burger–Roblin form.
  • domain assumption P_θ-hypertransversality: existence of a proper geodesic Gromov hyperbolic model Z with Γ-equivariant boundary homeomorphism Ψ: Λ_Z(Γ)→Λ_θ(Γ) (Equation (5.3)).
    The guided-limit-set argument and shadow comparability in Corollary 5.12 require this structure. This is the main restriction of the theorem's scope.
  • domain assumption Convergence action of transverse subgroups on their limit sets ([KLP17, Theorem 4.16]) and comparability of BCZZ shadows with Tits-representation shadows (Proposition 5.3).
    Provides the dynamical framework for loxodromic elements, conical limit sets, and the estimates on Iwasawa cocycles in Theorem 5.5.
  • domain assumption Hopf–Tsuji–Sullivan dichotomy for transverse subgroups ([CZZ24], [KOW25b], Theorem 5.9).
    Used to conclude that a Patterson–Sullivan measure is divergence-type exactly when it is supported on the conical limit set, and that the associated Burger–Roblin measure is supported on R_{Γ,θ}.
  • domain assumption Ergodicity of the Burger–Roblin measure for hypertransverse subgroups ([Kim24]).
    Provides the inclusion (1)⊂(2) in Theorem 1.13 and is used in Corollary 6.5; without it the title 'classification' would only give a one-sided statement.
  • domain assumption Proper discontinuity of the Γ-action on Ω_θ(Γ) ([KOW25b, Theorem 1.7]).
    Used in Proposition 5.16 to prove that horospheres based at parabolic limit points have closed Γ-orbits, producing the closed-orbit alternative in the relatively Anosov classification.
invented entities (1)
  • Guided limit set Λ_{φ,K}(Γ)
    purpose: Limit points accumulated by synchronically aligned geodesic segments along translates of a loxodromic axis; used to show invariant measures concentrate on these sets (Theorem 6.3) and to strengthen the Hopf–Tsuji–Sullivan dichotomy.
    An internal proof device with no falsifiable handle outside the paper; adapted from the authors' companion work [CK25b].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Classification of horospherical invariant measures in higher rank: The Full Story." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4TWSUWK7

@misc{pith2026260122668,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Classification of horospherical invariant measures in higher rank: The Full Story},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4TWSUWK7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.22668}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we classify horospherical invariant Radon measures for Anosov subgroups of arbitrary semisimple real algebraic groups. This generalizes the works of Burger and Roblin in rank one to higher ranks. At the same time, this extends the works of Furstenberg, Veech, and Dani, and a special case of Ratner's theorem for finite-volume homogeneous spaces to infinite-volume Anosov homogeneous spaces. Especially, this resolves the open problems proposed by Landesberg--Lee--Lindenstrauss--Oh and by Oh. Our measure classification is in fact for a more general class of discrete subgroups, including relatively Anosov subgroups with respect to any parabolic subgroups, not necessarily minimal. We also obtain results for their normal subgroups. Our method is rather geometric, not relying on continuous flows or ergodic theorems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.22668 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A squeezing geodesic γ (left) and a contracting geodesic γ (right) The coarseness of the contracting property does not allow similar approx￾imations of cocycles as in ([CK25b], [CK25a]) to work. To overcome this obstruction, we establish in this paper a robust connection between align￾ments of several geodesics in the Gromov hyperbolic space on which Γ acts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Alignment of geodesics and points. The following is immediate. Lemma 2.7. Let γ ⊂ X be a geodesic of length L ≥ 0, let 0 ≤ D ≤ L and let x ∈ X. Then (γ, x) is not D-aligned or (x, γ) is not (L − D)-aligned. Definition 2.8. Let x ∈ ∂X and γ ⊂ X be a compact geodesic. For K ≥ 0, we say that (x, γ) is K-aligned if for every sequence {zi}i∈N ⊂ X converging to x, (zi , γ) is K-aligned eventually (i.e., for all large i ∈ … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Arzhantseva, Christopher H

    Goulnara N. Arzhantseva, Christopher H. Cashen, and Jing Tao. Growth tight actions. Pacific J. Math. , 278(1):1--49, 2015

    2015

  2. [2]

    Invariant measures and asymptotics for some skew products

    Jon Aaronson, Hitoshi Nakada, Omri Sarig, and Rita Solomyak. Invariant measures and asymptotics for some skew products. Israel J. Math. , 128:93--134, 2002

    2002

  3. [3]

    On the classification of invariant measures for horosphere foliations on nilpotent covers of negatively curved manifolds

    Martine Babillot. On the classification of invariant measures for horosphere foliations on nilpotent covers of negatively curved manifolds. In Random walks and geometry , pages 319--335. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2004

    2004

  4. [4]

    Counting, mixing and equidistribution for GPS systems with applications to relatively anosov groups

    Pierre-Louis Blayac, Richard Canary, Feng Zhu, and Andrew Zimmer. Counting, mixing and equidistribution for GPS systems with applications to relatively anosov groups. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.09718 , 2024

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Patterson- S ullivan theory for coarse cocycles

    Pierre-Louis Blayac, Richard Canary, Feng Zhu, and Andrew Zimmer. Patterson- S ullivan theory for coarse cocycles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.09713 , 2024

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Y. Benoist. Propri\' e t\' e s asymptotiques des groupes lin\' e aires. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 7(1):1--47, 1997

    1997

  7. [7]

    Propri\'et\'es asymptotiques des groupes lin\'eaires

    Yves Benoist. Propri\'et\'es asymptotiques des groupes lin\'eaires. II . In Analysis on homogeneous spaces and representation theory of L ie groups, O kayama-- K yoto (1997) , volume 26 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math. , pages 33--48. Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 2000

    1997

  8. [8]

    Bridson and Andr\'e Haefliger

    Martin R. Bridson and Andr\'e Haefliger. Metric spaces of non-positive curvature , volume 319 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences] . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999

    1999

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Geodesic paths and horocycle flow on abelian covers

    Martine Babillot and Fran c ois Ledrappier. Geodesic paths and horocycle flow on abelian covers. In Lie groups and ergodic theory ( M umbai, 1996) , volume 14 of Tata Inst. Fund. Res. Stud. Math. , pages 1--32. Tata Inst. Fund. Res., Bombay, 1998

    1996

  2. [10]

    The H opf- T suji- S ullivan dichotomy in higher rank and applications to A nosov subgroups

    Marc Burger, Or Landesberg, Minju Lee, and Hee Oh. The H opf- T suji- S ullivan dichotomy in higher rank and applications to A nosov subgroups. J. Mod. Dyn. , 19:301--330, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Equilibrium states and the ergodic theory of A nosov diffeomorphisms , volume 470 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics

    Rufus Bowen. Equilibrium states and the ergodic theory of A nosov diffeomorphisms , volume 470 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, revised edition, 2008. With a preface by David Ruelle, Edited by Jean-Ren\' e Chazottes

    2008

  4. [12]

    Random walks on reductive groups , volume 62 of Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete

    Yves Benoist and Jean-Fran c ois Quint. Random walks on reductive groups , volume 62 of Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Ma...

    2016

  5. [13]

    Horocycle flow on geometrically finite surfaces

    Marc Burger. Horocycle flow on geometrically finite surfaces. Duke Math. J. , 61(3):779--803, 1990

    1990

  6. [14]

    Genericity of contracting geodesics in groups

    Kunal Chawla, Inhyeok Choi, and Giulio Tiozzo. Genericity of contracting geodesics in groups. Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics , 2025

    2025

  7. [15]

    Coornaert, T

    M. Coornaert, T. Delzant, and A. Papadopoulos. G\' e om\' e trie et th\' e orie des groupes , volume 1441 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990. Les groupes hyperboliques de Gromov. [Gromov hyperbolic groups], With an English summary

    1990

  8. [16]

    Inhyeok Choi and Dongryul M. Kim. Classification of horospherical invariant measures in higher rank: Teaser. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.23365 , 2025

    2025

  9. [17]

    Inhyeok Choi and Dongryul M. Kim. Invariant measures on the space of measured laminations for subgroups of mapping class group. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.23256 , 2025

    2025

  10. [18]

    Patterson- S ullivan theory for groups with a strongly contracting element

    R\' e mi Coulon. Patterson- S ullivan theory for groups with a strongly contracting element. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems , 44(11):3216--3271, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Cusped H itchin representations and A nosov representations of geometrically finite F uchsian groups

    Richard Canary, Tengren Zhang, and Andrew Zimmer. Cusped H itchin representations and A nosov representations of geometrically finite F uchsian groups. Adv. Math. , 404:Paper No. 108439, 67, 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    Patterson- S ullivan measures for transverse subgroups

    Richard Canary, Tengren Zhang, and Andrew Zimmer. Patterson- S ullivan measures for transverse subgroups. J. Mod. Dyn. , 20:319--377, 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Patterson- S ullivan measures for relatively A nosov groups

    Richard Canary, Tengren Zhang, and Andrew Zimmer. Patterson- S ullivan measures for relatively A nosov groups. Math. Ann. , 392(2):2309--2363, 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    S. G. Dani. Invariant measures of horospherical flows on noncompact homogeneous spaces. Invent. Math. , 47(2):101--138, 1978

    1978

  15. [23]

    S. G. Dani. Invariant measures and minimal sets of horospherical flows. Invent. Math. , 64(2):357--385, 1981

    1981

  16. [24]

    Anosov groups: local mixing, counting and equidistribution

    Sam Edwards, Minju Lee, and Hee Oh. Anosov groups: local mixing, counting and equidistribution. Geom. Topol. , 27(2):513--573, 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    The unique ergodicity of the horocycle flow

    Harry Furstenberg. The unique ergodicity of the horocycle flow. In Recent advances in topological dynamics ( P roc. C onf. T opological D ynamics, Y ale U niv., N ew H aven, C onn., 1972; in honor of G ustav A rnold H edlund) , Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 318, pages 95--115. ...

    1972

  18. [26]

    Le bord d'un espace hyperbolique

    \' E tienne Ghys and Pierre de la Harpe. Le bord d'un espace hyperbolique. In Sur les groupes hyperboliques d'apr \`e s M ikhael G romov ( B ern, 1988) , volume 83 of Progr. Math. , pages 117--134. Birkh\" a user Boston, Boston, MA, 1990

    1988

  19. [27]

    Anosov representations and proper actions

    Fran c ois Gu\'eritaud, Olivier Guichard, Fanny Kassel, and Anna Wienhard. Anosov representations and proper actions. Geom. Topol. , 21(1):485--584, 2017

    2017

  20. [28]

    M. Gromov. Hyperbolic groups. In Essays in group theory , volume 8 of Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. , pages 75--263. Springer, New York, 1987

    1987

  21. [29]

    Anosov representations: domains of discontinuity and applications

    Olivier Guichard and Anna Wienhard. Anosov representations: domains of discontinuity and applications. Invent. Math. , 190(2):357--438, 2012

    2012

  22. [30]

    Dongryul M. Kim. Conformal measure rigidity and ergodicity of horospherical foliations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.13727 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Anosov subgroups: dynamical and geometric characterizations

    Michael Kapovich, Bernhard Leeb, and Joan Porti. Anosov subgroups: dynamical and geometric characterizations. Eur. J. Math. , 3(4):808--898, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    Kim, Hee Oh, and Yahui Wang

    Dongryul M. Kim, Hee Oh, and Yahui Wang. Ergodic dichotomy for subspace flows in higher rank. Commun. Am. Math. Soc. , 5:1--47, 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    Kim, Hee Oh, and Yahui Wang

    Dongryul M. Kim, Hee Oh, and Yahui Wang. Properly discontinuous actions, growth indicators, and conformal measures for transverse subgroups. Math. Ann. , 393(2):2391--2450, 2025

    2025

  26. [34]

    Anosov flows, surface groups and curves in projective space

    Fran c ois Labourie. Anosov flows, surface groups and curves in projective space. Invent. Math. , 165(1):51--114, 2006

    2006

  27. [35]

    Horospherically invariant measures and finitely generated K leinian groups

    Or Landesberg. Horospherically invariant measures and finitely generated K leinian groups. J. Mod. Dyn. , 17:337--352, 2021

    2021

  28. [36]

    Invariant measures for the stable foliation on negatively curved periodic manifolds

    Fran c ois Ledrappier. Invariant measures for the stable foliation on negatively curved periodic manifolds. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) , 58(1):85--105, 2008

    2008

  29. [37]

    On R adon measures invariant under horospherical flows on geometrically infinite quotients

    Or Landesberg and Elon Lindenstrauss. On R adon measures invariant under horospherical flows on geometrically infinite quotients. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (15):11602--11641, 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Horospherical invariant measures and a rank dichotomy for A nosov groups

    Or Landesberg, Minju Lee, Elon Lindenstrauss, and Hee Oh. Horospherical invariant measures and a rank dichotomy for A nosov groups. J. Mod. Dyn. , 19:331--362, 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    Invariant measures for horospherical actions and A nosov groups

    Minju Lee and Hee Oh. Invariant measures for horospherical actions and A nosov groups. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (19):16226--16295, 2023

    2023

  32. [40]

    Ergodic decompositions of geometric measures on A nosov homogeneous spaces

    Minju Lee and Hee Oh. Ergodic decompositions of geometric measures on A nosov homogeneous spaces. Israel J. Math. , 260(1):195--234, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Invariant measures for the horocycle flow on periodic hyperbolic surfaces

    Fran c ois Ledrappier and Omri Sarig. Invariant measures for the horocycle flow on periodic hyperbolic surfaces. Israel J. Math. , 160:281--315, 2007

    2007

  34. [42]

    Yair N. Minsky. Quasi-projections in T eichm\" u ller space. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 473:121--136, 1996

    1996

  35. [43]

    Dynamics and R igidity through the L ens of C ircles

    Hee Oh. Dynamics and R igidity through the L ens of C ircles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.10771 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Local mixing and invariant measures for horospherical subgroups on abelian covers

    Hee Oh and Wenyu Pan. Local mixing and invariant measures for horospherical subgroups on abelian covers. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (19):6036--6088, 2019

    2019

  37. [45]

    J.-F. Quint. Divergence exponentielle des sous-groupes discrets en rang sup\' e rieur. Comment. Math. Helv. , 77(3):563--608, 2002

    2002

  38. [46]

    J.-F. Quint. Mesures de P atterson- S ullivan en rang sup\' e rieur. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 12(4):776--809, 2002

    2002

  39. [47]

    On R aghunathan's measure conjecture

    Marina Ratner. On R aghunathan's measure conjecture. Ann. of Math. (2) , 134(3):545--607, 1991

    1991

  40. [48]

    Ergodicit\'e et \'equidistribution en courbure n\'egative

    Thomas Roblin. Ergodicit\'e et \'equidistribution en courbure n\'egative. M\'em. Soc. Math. Fr. (N.S.) , (95):vi+96, 2003

    2003

  41. [49]

    Sambarino

    A. Sambarino. A report on an ergodic dichotomy. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems , 44(1):236--289, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Invariant R adon measures for horocycle flows on abelian covers

    Omri Sarig. Invariant R adon measures for horocycle flows on abelian covers. Invent. Math. , 157(3):519--551, 2004

    2004

  43. [51]

    The horocyclic flow and the L aplacian on hyperbolic surfaces of infinite genus

    Omri Sarig. The horocyclic flow and the L aplacian on hyperbolic surfaces of infinite genus. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 19(6):1757--1812, 2010

    2010

  44. [52]

    Projections and relative hyperbolicity

    Alessandro Sisto. Projections and relative hyperbolicity. Enseign. Math. (2) , 59(1-2):165--181, 2013

    2013

  45. [53]

    Contracting elements and random walks

    Alessandro Sisto. Contracting elements and random walks. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 742:79--114, 2018

    2018

  46. [54]

    J. Tits. Repr\' e sentations lin\' e aires irr\' e ductibles d'un groupe r\' e ductif sur un corps quelconque. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 247:196--220, 1971

    1971

  47. [55]

    William A. Veech. Unique ergodicity of horospherical flows. Amer. J. Math. , 99(4):827--859, 1977

    1977

  48. [56]

    Mixing of frame flow for rank one locally symmetric spaces and measure classification

    Dale Winter. Mixing of frame flow for rank one locally symmetric spaces and measure classification. Israel J. Math. , 210(1):467--507, 2015

    2015

  49. [57]

    Growth tightness for groups with contracting elements

    Wen-yuan Yang. Growth tightness for groups with contracting elements. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. , 157(2):297--319, 2014

    2014

  50. [58]

    Statistically convex-cocompact actions of groups with contracting elements

    Wen-yuan Yang. Statistically convex-cocompact actions of groups with contracting elements. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (23):7259--7323, 2019

    2019

  51. [59]

    Conformal dynamics at infinity for groups with contracting elements

    Wen-yuan Yang. Conformal dynamics at infinity for groups with contracting elements. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.04861 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.