DanceGraph: A Complementary Architecture for Synchronous Dancing Online

Ademyemi Ademola; Babis Koniaris; David Sinclair; Kenny Mitchell

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 21 references

DanceGraph: A Complementary Architecture for Synchronous Dancing Online

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read DanceGraph's direct sensor-to-network path cuts dancing latency from 79.3 ms to 16.5 ms by skipping the game engine update loop.

desk verdict The 62.8 ms latency saving in DanceGraph is not yet established because the two measurements stop at different endpoints; the architecture is promising but the paper's quantitative claims need rework. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18052 v1 pith:52NLFYK3 submitted 2025-07-24 cs.GR

David Sinclair , Ademyemi Ademola , Babis Koniaris , Kenny Mitchell This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.GR

keywords DanceLatencyMotionCaptureAnimationNetworkArchitectureQuaternionCompressionRhythmicPredictionSynchronousOnline

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Synchronized online dancing fails when network plus software delay pushes a partner's pose past the beat. DanceGraph claims to cut the software side of that delay by intercepting tracking data at the sensor-driver level and sending it straight to the network, before any game engine update loop or network library gets a chance to buffer it; measured against a standard Unity implementation, the paper reports the time to queue pose data drops from 79.3 ms to 16.5 ms on average. On top of that, the paper presents a lossless compression trick that drops the largest quaternion component ($w$, almost always dominant in dance joints) and reconstructs it from the other three, cutting the pose stream by a third. It then applies rhythmic dance correctives that shift incoming poses in time to the local music beat, reducing how far ahead motion prediction has to look. If those numbers hold, remote dancers see each other a meaningful fraction of a beat sooner, with enough bandwidth left for 30 simultaneous dancers.

What carries the argument

Two mechanisms carry the argument. The first is the intercept-and-route data path: producer modules, such as a camera SDK or network listener, publish pose signals to a Signal Manager, which links them via pointers to consumer modules, such as the network or a game-engine adapter, so data bypasses the engine's polling and buffering; this is what yields the measured 62.8 ms saving. The second is quaternion component dropping: each joint's orientation quaternion is stored as $(x, y, z, w)$, and because $w$ is normally the largest component it is discarded and reconstructed from the other three; the paper calls the result lossless and attributes the two-thirds stream size to it. A third mechanism, the rhythmic correctives, detects the dominant period of joint-motion time series and remaps them to the musical beat, keeping remote avatars perceptually in time.

What would settle it

Record a motion where a limb rotates 180 degrees about its axis, giving a quaternion with $w = 0$, and push it through the pipeline; reconstructing $w$ from the other three components will not recover the original orientation, which would refute the claim that the two-thirds bandwidth reduction is lossless.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the dominant share of latency in a networked dance avatar is created locally, by buffering and update-loop scheduling inside a general-purpose game engine, and that this share is removable by an engine-agnostic 'as-direct-as-possible' signal path. A DanceGraph client listens to sensor producers and network producers directly and routes signals through a Signal Manager to consumers via in-memory pointers, so tracking from a camera reaches a remote client or local display without waiting for the engine's scripting step. The paper reports 16.5 ms to queue tracking data from the camera frame, against 79.3 ms for a Unity-based baseline, an average saving of 62.8 ms; an ablation without networking shows 24.8 ms versus 79.3 ms, a 54.5 ms saving from engine bypass alone; and the custom transport beats a general-purpose Unity transport by about 3 ms round trip. Lossless compression then drops the largest quaternion component per joint and reconstructs it, reducing the stream to two-thirds, which the paper states suffices for 30 concurrent dancers. Separately, the Rhythmic Dance Prediction Transformer detects dominant periods in a dance sequence, such as hip-sway, remaps them to the beats of the local music, and optionally amplifies them with per-body-zone parameters, so arriving remote poses are corrected into time with the music.

Load-bearing premise

The lossless one-third bandwidth saving depends on the assumption that, for every joint in every dance move, the fourth number of the quaternion representation is the largest; on a pose where another component is largest, the dropped value cannot be recovered faithfully.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the measured 62.8 ms saving reproduces in real deployments, software-induced delay in a typical game-engine dance app can be cut by roughly three-quarters, meaning less prediction time is needed to land poses on the beat.
The quaternion $w$-dropping method implies any avatar rig whose joint quaternions are usually $w$-dominant can ship a lossless pose stream at two-thirds the bandwidth, which the paper shows is enough for 30 live dance signals.
Because the architecture is engine-agnostic, the same adapters can be carried from one game engine to another or to direct haptic and VR display paths without changing the networking core.
Rhythmic correctives make long hitches and network jitter more tolerable, since poses are continuously remapped to the local music period rather than rigidly replayed.
Parametrized amplification of periodic body-zone motion gives choreographers and players a live control for stylized, exaggerated dance without retargeting or new animation data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: the same bypass architecture could reduce input-to-avatar latency for any co-present social VR activity, not just dance, because the game-engine polling delay is independent of the motion's musical structure.
Editorial inference: since the lossless reconstruction works only when $w$ is dominant, a cheap robustness extension would be to encode a one-bit selection of which quaternion component to drop, trading a small bandwidth overhead for safety; the paper notes the selection would cost two bits but does not pursue it.
Editorial inference: a perceptually validated study comparing dancers' beat-alignment ratings under the architecture versus a standard pipeline would test whether the reported 62.8 ms reduction actually translates into perceived synchronization, which is the outcome the paper ultimately cares about.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

First, the headline number: the 62.8 ms average latency saving in Section 3.4.1 doesn't yet hold up. The regular Unity/Mirror pipeline is timed until the pose packet arrives in C# (79.3 ms), while the DanceGraph number (16.5 ms) is the time to queue to the network. Those aren't the same endpoint. No trial counts, no error bars, no hardware details. So treat that number as provisional.

The architecture itself is genuinely worth a look. It's a clean, engine-agnostic producer/consumer design that intercepts sensor data before the game-engine update loop, and it's open source. The shared-memory adapter and direct network queue are practical. Demonstrating 30 simulated dancers is a reasonable stress test.

The weak points are real but fixable. The bandwidth section says 'lossless' and 'two-thirds,' but dropping one of four quaternion components is 3/4, not 2/3, and the 'almost always' qualifier contradicts losslessness. Reconstructing w from x,y,z needs a sign convention; the paper doesn't address it. The 'Rythmic Dance Prediction Transformer' in the abstract and Section 4 has no model, training, or evaluation—it's a placeholder presented as a contribution. The abstract's claim that it reduces prediction timeframe is unsupported.

What's missing is proper experimental discipline: like-for-like endpoints, statistics, and clearer claims. The core idea (bypass the engine loop) is plausible and has been used elsewhere, but the paper's own measurements don't yet prove the specific savings it advertises.

I'd send it to peer review, expecting major revision, because the architecture is concrete and open source, and the errors are correctable. Recommend engaging, but ask for a proper measurement comparison before trusting the numbers.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes DanceGraph, an engine-agnostic, C++-based producer/consumer architecture for low-latency networked avatar dance. Its main ideas are to intercept sensor signals before they enter the game-engine update loop, to reduce bandwidth by dropping one quaternion component of each joint orientation based on per-joint data-driven bounds, and to use rhythmic motion prediction and stylization to make remote dancers appear synchronized with local music. The paper reports measured latency savings against a Unity plus Mirror baseline, bandwidth reductions, and a stylized motion result, and it releases the implementation as open source.

Significance. If the reported latency reductions are reproducible, the engine-bypass architecture is a practically valuable contribution to networked social VR and dance applications. The paper has several concrete strengths: it is open source; the modular producer/consumer design is clearly described; the latency comparison addresses a real systems problem; and the use of MoSh-based correctives connects the work to an established motion-capture pipeline. However, the central quantitative claims are not yet established because the latency comparison does not compare like for like, the reported statistics lack trial counts and variances, and the bandwidth arithmetic appears inconsistent. The rhythmic prediction component, described as a primary latency countermeasure, is presented without a model, training procedure, or evaluation.

major comments (3)

[Section 3.4.1 and Section 3.4.2] The headline latency saving of 62.8 ms is not a like-for-like comparison. The 79.3 ms figure measures the time until the Unity C# scripting layer acquires the packet after the ZED image is retrieved into RAM, while the 16.5 ms figure measures the time until DanceGraph queues tracking data to the network. The Unity pipeline's own network-queue time is not included in the 79.3 ms figure, so the two endpoints differ. The text also gives no trial count, variance, hardware configuration, or confirmation that identical recorded footage and identical ZED SDK processing were used in both arms. Because Section 3.4.2 reuses the same 79.3 ms baseline for its ablation, the 54.5 ms saving inherits the same ambiguity. The central latency claim needs a repeated, instrumented comparison at the same measurement endpoint, such as the moment a packet is handed to the network socket.
[Section 3.3] The bandwidth-reduction claim is internally inconsistent. Dropping one of the four quaternion components leaves three of four components, which is 3/4 of the original size, not the stated two-thirds of the original network data stream size. Moreover, the text says the w component is 'almost always the largest' and can therefore be discarded and reconstructed losslessly; this qualifier contradicts the word 'lossless' unless the condition is made precise and validated across the dance dataset. If w is not eventually dominant in magnitude, reconstructing it as the positive square root can change the represented orientation. The paper should state the exact quantization and reconstruction rules, report the fraction of frames where the assumption holds, and quantify any error introduced.
[Section 4] The 'Rythmic Dance Prediction Transformer' is a primary contribution in the abstract and introduction, but Section 4 provides no architecture, input/output specification, training procedure, data, or evaluation. The described remapping of detected rhythmic motion features to the local musical beat makes the 'in-time' appearance true by construction rather than a measured outcome; there is no evidence that the predicted motions are plausible or that they improve perceived synchronization. This section needs either a concrete method description with quantitative evaluation or a clear repositioning of the contribution as a conceptual proposal rather than a validated system component.

minor comments (6)

[Section 4 title and text] The name is spelled 'Rythmic' in the section heading and text; it should be 'Rhythmic'.
[Section 4] The text refers to '(Figure 1)' for the Rythmic Dance Prediction Transformer, but Figure 1 is the architecture diagram, not the transformer. Please correct the figure reference.
[Section 3.4.3] The reported saving of 3.01 ms is difficult to reconcile with the stated values of 'over 16ms' for Unity Transport and 'just under 10ms' for DanceGraph; a 16 ms-to-10 ms reduction is about 6 ms. Please clarify the exact measured values and the comparison endpoints.
[Section 4] The phrase 'the remap these detected rhythmic motion features' contains a grammatical error and should be revised.
[References] Reference [20] appears to be used for both 'Lee et al.' and 'DanceNet [20]', but the reference list entry is Zhuang et al., 'Music2Dance: DanceNet'. Please correct the citation labels or the reference entries.
[Section 4] The dataset sample name '50020-salsa-1-stageii' should be formatted and explained so readers can identify the exact MoSh/AMASS sequence.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Low circularity: one self-definitional beat-remapping claim; core latency and bandwidth results are empirical and independent.

self definitional [Section 4, first paragraph (Rythmic Dance Prediction Transformer and salsa example)]
"we employ a synthetic motion correction in the Rythmic Dance Prediction Transformer ... to alter the incoming pose sequences according to the rhythmic motion features of the dance's local music time context so that the remote dancers appear locally to have synchronous 'in-time' motions with the musical beat. ... we identify the dominant periods ... and the remap these detected rhythmic motion features in time according to the beat of the musical sequence."

The claimed outcome, 'synchronous in-time motions with the musical beat', is defined by alignment to the beat, and the stated mechanism is to remap detected rhythmic motion features according to the beat. The synchronized appearance is therefore the direct construction from the input beat rather than an independently measured or predicted quantity. Since Section 4 offers no separate synchrony metric, comparison, or evaluation, the synchronization countermeasure's stated effect is true by definition. This is a low, non-load-bearing circularity because it does not affect the empirical latency or bandwidth claims.

full rationale

The paper's latency and bandwidth claims are self-contained empirical or deterministic results: the 16.5 ms versus 79.3 ms figures are reported measurements, and the quaternion component dropping is a fixed coding operation. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing argument depends on a self-citation; the cited prior works (MoSh, AMASS, networking references) are external. The only by-construction element is the rhythmic correction in Section 4, where 'in-time' synchronization is defined as beat alignment and the method simply remaps detected periodic motion to the beat; this is a design construction rather than a validated empirical prediction, so it contributes only a minor self-definitional aspect. The separate measurement-endpoint mismatch in Section 3.4.1 and the apparent 2/3 versus 3/4 bandwidth arithmetic error are correctness concerns, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central latency claim relies on reported measurements that lack statistical detail; the bandwidth claim relies on a domain assumption about quaternion component dominance; the synchronization claim depends on an undescribed model. These are the primary premises the reader is asked to accept without independent verification.

free parameters (1)

Per-joint quaternion component bounds = not reported
Section 3.3 determines per joint and quaternion component numerical ranges across a range of dance motions to define quantization bounds; these are data-derived parameters that affect the compression fidelity claim.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The w component of joint orientation quaternions is almost always the largest, so it can be discarded and reconstructed from x, y, z without loss.
Section 3.3 states the 'w' component was almost always the largest; the qualifier 'almost always' means the lossless claim is not strictly guaranteed for all motions.
domain assumption Dance motions contain dominant periodicities detectable from a short window that can be remapped to the musical beat without breaking motion plausibility.
Section 4 assumes periodogram-dominant features of a salsa sample can be time-remapped to the beat to make remote dancers appear synchronous; no evaluation supports this.
domain assumption The measured latency difference is not affected by unstated hardware, network, or trial variability.
Section 3.4 reports single average numbers without variance, trial count, or network conditions; generalization assumes these are stable.

invented entities (1)

Rythmic Dance Prediction Transformer
purpose: To alter incoming pose sequences according to rhythmic features of local music so remote dancers appear in-time with the beat.
Section 4 names the transformer but provides no architecture, training, or evaluation; it is a black-box placeholder for the synchronization claim.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DanceGraph: A Complementary Architecture for Synchronous Dancing Online." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/52NLFYK3

@misc{pith2026250718052,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DanceGraph: A Complementary Architecture for Synchronous Dancing Online},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/52NLFYK3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18052}
}

read the original abstract

DanceGraph is an architecture for synchronized online dancing overcoming the latency of networked body pose sharing. We break down this challenge by developing a real-time bandwidth-efficient architecture to minimize lag and reduce the timeframe of required motion prediction for synchronization with the music's rhythm. In addition, we show an interactive method for the parameterized stylization of dance motions for rhythmic dance using online dance correctives.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18052 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Thirty connected simulated dancers, generated using prerecorded motion signals transmitted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Feature-based dance stylization and motion amplification in Blender at 30fps. The checked model is the original dancing avatar, and the grey model is our amplified stylized avatar motion showing wider hip sway motions. Here, the DanceGraph system is able to route the network infrastructure from the client to the server to another client in just under 10ms, on average, saving 3.01ms in network buffering. This saving… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

[1]

Rhythm is a dancer: Music-driven motion synthesis with global structure, 11 2021

Andreas Aristidou, Anastasios Yian- nakides, Kfir Aberman, Daniel Cohen-Or, Ariel Shamir, and Yiorgos Chrysanthou. Rhythm is a dancer: Music-driven motion synthesis with global structure, 11 2021

work page 2021
[2]

Black, Dan- ica Kragic, and Hedvig Kjellstrom

Judith Butepage, Michael J. Black, Dan- ica Kragic, and Hedvig Kjellstrom. Deep Representation Learning for Human Mo- tion Prediction and Classification. pages 6158–6166, 2017

work page 2017
[3]

ChoreoMaster: choreography-oriented music-driven dance synthesis

Kang Chen, Zhipeng Tan, Jin Lei, Song- Hai Zhang, Yuan-Chen Guo, Weidong Zhang, and Shi-Min Hu. ChoreoMaster: choreography-oriented music-driven dance synthesis. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 40(4):145:1–145:13, July 2021

work page 2021
[4]

Example-Based Automatic Music- Driven Conventional Dance Motion Syn- thesis

Rukun Fan, Songhua Xu, and Weidong Geng. Example-Based Automatic Music- Driven Conventional Dance Motion Syn- thesis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , 18(3):501–515, March 2012. Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Com- puter Graphics

work page 2012
[5]

Gagliardi, R

M. Gagliardi, R. Rajkumar, and L. Sha. The real-time publisher/subscriber inter- process communication model for dis- tributed real-time systems: design and im- plementation. In 2013 IEEE 19th Real- Time and Embedded Technology and Ap- plications Symposium (RTAS) , page 66, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, may 1995. IEEE Computer Society

work page 2013
[6]

UE4.27 - Unreal Engine 4 Documentation - Low Latency Frame Syncing

Epic Games. UE4.27 - Unreal Engine 4 Documentation - Low Latency Frame Syncing. Epic Games

work page
[7]

A Recurrent V ariational Autoencoder for Human Motion Synthesis

Ikhsanul Habibie, Daniel Holden, Jonathan Schwarz, Joe Yearsley, and Taku Komura. A Recurrent V ariational Autoencoder for Human Motion Synthesis. January 2017

work page 2017
[8]

Symbiotic graph neural networks for 3d skeleton-based human action recognition and motion prediction

Maosen Li, Siheng Chen, Xu Chen, Ya Zhang, Yanfeng Wang, and Qi Tian. Symbiotic graph neural networks for 3d skeleton-based human action recognition and motion prediction. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelli- gence, 44(6):3316–3333, 2021. Publisher: IEEE

work page 2021

Show all 21 references

[9]

Loper, Naureen Mahmood, and Michael J

Matthew M. Loper, Naureen Mahmood, and Michael J. Black. MoSh: Mo- tion and shape capture from sparse mark- ers. ACM Transactions on Graphics, (Proc. SIGGRAPH Asia) , 33(6):220:1– 220:13, November 2014

2014
[10]

Scott MacKenzie and Colin Ware

I. Scott MacKenzie and Colin Ware. Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems. In Proceedings of the INTERACT ’93 and CHI ’93 Confer- ence on Human Factors in Computing Sys- tems, CHI ’93, page 488–493, New York, NY , USA, 1993. Association for Comput- in...

1993
[11]

Troje, Gerard Pons-Moll, and Michael J

Naureen Mahmood, Nima Ghorbani, Nikolaus F. Troje, Gerard Pons-Moll, and Michael J. Black. AMASS: Archive of motion capture as surface shapes. In International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 5442–5451, October 2019

2019
[12]

Event-driven archi- tecture overview

Brenda M Michelson. Event-driven archi- tecture overview. Patricia Seybold Group, 2(12):10–1571, 2006

2006
[13]

Diverse dance synthesis via keyframes with transformer controllers, 2022

Junjun Pan, Siyuan Wang, Junxuan Bai, and Ju Dai. Diverse dance synthesis via keyframes with transformer controllers, 2022

2022
[14]

Dancing-to-Music Character Animation

Takaaki Shiratori, Atsushi Nakazawa, and Katsushi Ikeuchi. Dancing-to-Music Character Animation. Computer Graphics F orum, 25(3):449–458, 2006. eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467- 8659.2006.00964.x

2006
[15]

Kankanhalli, Wei- dong Geng, and Xiangdong Li

Guofei Sun, Yongkang Wong, Zhiyong Cheng, Mohan S. Kankanhalli, Wei- dong Geng, and Xiangdong Li. Deep- Dance: Music-to-Dance Motion Choreog- raphy With Adversarial Learning. IEEE 7 Transactions on Multimedia , 23:497–509,
[16]

Transflower: probabilistic au- toregressive dance generation with multi- modal attention

Guillermo Valle-P ´erez, Gustav Eje Henter, Jonas Beskow, Andr ´e Holzapfel, Pierre- Yves Oudeyer, and Simon Alexander- son. Transflower: probabilistic au- toregressive dance generation with multi- modal attention. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 40(6):1–14, December 2021. arXiv...

2021 arXiv
[17]

Group- dancer: Music to multi-people dance syn- thesis with style collaboration

Zixuan Wang, Jia Jia, Haozhe Wu, Jun- liang Xing, Jinghe Cai, Fanbo Meng, Guowen Chen, and Yanfeng Wang. Group- dancer: Music to multi-people dance syn- thesis with style collaboration. In Pro- ceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM ’22, page 1138–...

2022
[18]

Convolu- tional sequence generation for skeleton- based action synthesis

Sijie Yan, Zhizhong Li, Yuanjun Xiong, Huahan Yan, and Dahua Lin. Convolu- tional sequence generation for skeleton- based action synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Confer- ence on Computer Vision (ICCV) , October 2019

2019
[19]

Keyframe control of music-driven 3d dance generation

Zhipeng Yang, Yu-Hui Wen, Shu-Yu Chen, Xiao Liu, Yuan Gao, Yong-Jin Liu, Lin Gao, and Hongbo Fu. Keyframe control of music-driven 3d dance generation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Com- puter Graphics, pages 1–12, 2023

2023
[20]

Music2Dance: DanceNet for Music- driven Dance Generation, March 2020

Wenlin Zhuang, Congyi Wang, Siyu Xia, Jinxiang Chai, and Yangang Wang. Music2Dance: DanceNet for Music- driven Dance Generation, March 2020. arXiv:2002.03761 [cs, eess]. 8

2020 arXiv
[2021]

Conference Name: IEEE Transac- tions on Multimedia

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Rhythm is a dancer: Music-driven motion synthesis with global structure, 11 2021

Andreas Aristidou, Anastasios Yian- nakides, Kfir Aberman, Daniel Cohen-Or, Ariel Shamir, and Yiorgos Chrysanthou. Rhythm is a dancer: Music-driven motion synthesis with global structure, 11 2021

work page 2021

[2] [2]

Black, Dan- ica Kragic, and Hedvig Kjellstrom

Judith Butepage, Michael J. Black, Dan- ica Kragic, and Hedvig Kjellstrom. Deep Representation Learning for Human Mo- tion Prediction and Classification. pages 6158–6166, 2017

work page 2017

[3] [3]

ChoreoMaster: choreography-oriented music-driven dance synthesis

Kang Chen, Zhipeng Tan, Jin Lei, Song- Hai Zhang, Yuan-Chen Guo, Weidong Zhang, and Shi-Min Hu. ChoreoMaster: choreography-oriented music-driven dance synthesis. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 40(4):145:1–145:13, July 2021

work page 2021

[4] [4]

Example-Based Automatic Music- Driven Conventional Dance Motion Syn- thesis

Rukun Fan, Songhua Xu, and Weidong Geng. Example-Based Automatic Music- Driven Conventional Dance Motion Syn- thesis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , 18(3):501–515, March 2012. Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Com- puter Graphics

work page 2012

[5] [5]

Gagliardi, R

M. Gagliardi, R. Rajkumar, and L. Sha. The real-time publisher/subscriber inter- process communication model for dis- tributed real-time systems: design and im- plementation. In 2013 IEEE 19th Real- Time and Embedded Technology and Ap- plications Symposium (RTAS) , page 66, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, may 1995. IEEE Computer Society

work page 2013

[6] [6]

UE4.27 - Unreal Engine 4 Documentation - Low Latency Frame Syncing

Epic Games. UE4.27 - Unreal Engine 4 Documentation - Low Latency Frame Syncing. Epic Games

work page

[7] [7]

A Recurrent V ariational Autoencoder for Human Motion Synthesis

Ikhsanul Habibie, Daniel Holden, Jonathan Schwarz, Joe Yearsley, and Taku Komura. A Recurrent V ariational Autoencoder for Human Motion Synthesis. January 2017

work page 2017

[8] [8]

Symbiotic graph neural networks for 3d skeleton-based human action recognition and motion prediction

Maosen Li, Siheng Chen, Xu Chen, Ya Zhang, Yanfeng Wang, and Qi Tian. Symbiotic graph neural networks for 3d skeleton-based human action recognition and motion prediction. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelli- gence, 44(6):3316–3333, 2021. Publisher: IEEE

work page 2021