Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ConflictLens: LLM-Based Conflict Resolution Training in Romantic Relationship

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.11715 v2 pith:53KL3BLB submitted 2025-05-16 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords conflictconflictlenspracticeresolutionromanticevaluationreflectrelationships
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Our poster presents ConflictLens, a three-stage simulation system powered by large language models (LLMs) and grounded in psychological theory, designed to help users reflect on and practice conflict resolution in romantic relationships. Users can upload real conflict scenarios to receive evaluation of behavioral patterns, reflect on conflicts by annotating their negative behaviors, and practice different conflict resolution strategies in AI-simulated duologues. Initial evaluation by three domain experts suggests that ConflictLens offers a realistic experience and effectively supports self-guided reflection and communication practice in romantic relationships.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Artificial Intelligence and Civil Discourse: How LLMs Moderate Climate Change Conversations

    cs.CY 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    LLM replies to climate change posts are more emotionally neutral and lower in intensity than the human posts they respond to.

Pith tools